CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LINKS

March 18, 2026

CT Construction Digest Wednesday March 18, 2026

East Windsor will appeal Siting Council's decision to grant 150-acre expansion to solar array

Michael Walsh

EAST WINDSOR — The town is appealing the Connecticut Siting Council's recent decision to grant an expansion to an existing solar project in town.

On March 5, the Siting Council approved the expansion of the Gravel Pit Solar array, which will utilize an additional 150 acres of land to generate an additional 30 megawatts of power.

Last week, the Board of Selectmen asked the town attorney to draft an appeal.

"The Town of East Windsor strongly opposed this expansion," said First Selectman Jason Bowsza in a statement, citing a petition signed by more than 2,300 people.

"Despite these efforts, the Council once again declined to meaningfully consider the cumulative impact that repeated large-scale renewable energy developments are having on the Town of East Windsor," Bowsza said. "As has been the case in many previous decisions, municipal concerns and local planning considerations were given limited weight in the final outcome."

The petition claims that East Windsor "already hosts nearly 25% of Connecticut’s large-scale solar generation" and that the town is the "most heavily burdened town in the state and home to the largest concentration of utility-scale solar in New England."

The Siting Council, in its decision, said the expansion would achieve "additional renewable generation capacity efficiently and cost-effectively while minimizing environmental and construction impacts."

According to Gravel Pit Solar, the expansion would bring power to approximately 4,500 homes in the area.

State Rep. Carol Hall, R-Enfield, wrote Gov. Ned Lamont last week, asking him to visit East Windsor and tour the solar array "to see firsthand the significant impact the massive solar array farms are having on our local landscape, community character, and nuisance noise that continues to emit from these facilities most of the day."

"I believe it is vital for you to witness first-hand the growing tension between our state’s renewable energy goals and certain towns being asked to take on an unfair burden of these massive solar installations," Hall wrote in her letter.

State Sen. Saud Anwar, D-South Windsor, also wrote to Lamont, asking him to visit the site with him and other elected officials and for a moratorium of activity at the site "until resident concerns can be vetted."

"My colleagues and I testified to the Siting Council noting the project's continuing impact on residents' daily lives, from disturbing noises to threats to public safety," Anwar said in his letter. "This is not an instance of limited opposition. It is public opinion in East Windsor that this project is not right for the community."


Major exit ramp on I-84 in Hartford to be closed to night traffic for two months

Michael Walsh

HARTFORD — A major exit ramp on Interstate 84 in the Hartford area will be closed to traffic at night starting March 23.

Exit 51, which takes motorists from I-84 eastbound to Interstate 91 northbound, will not be accessible Monday through Friday from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m. for a planned $5.5 million bridge rehabilitation construction project.

The work includes bridge deck repairs, parapet improvements, joint removal, substructure repairs and paving, the state’s Department of Transportation said.

Motorists will be detoured through the area, the department said. Work is expected to continue through the spring season, with the exit ramp reopening at night on May 29. The entire project is expected to be completed by the end of November.

The bridge, which was built in 1990, is known as the “I-84 Flyover Bridge.”

“The primary purpose of this project is to address the operational, safety and preventative maintenance concerns as well as to evaluate and if necessary, improve the structural integrity of the bridge to a 'state of good repair' extending its useful service life,” the department said.


Berlin to replace Glen Street bridge this spring

Claudio S. Hilario

BERLIN — A bridge on Glen Street over the Mattabesset River will be replaced beginning this spring, a project town officials say is needed because of the structure’s condition.

Public Works Director Mike Ahern said the bridge needs to be replaced after earlier repairs were made to keep it safe.

“Its condition is the primary reason for the replacement project,” Ahern told the Herald. “One half of the bridge required emergency repairs in 2022 to stabilize the flow path through the metal culvert section until the full project was designed and bid.”

Construction is expected to begin in April. During most of the construction period, Glen Street will be closed to through traffic. Drivers will be directed to use detours around the area.

“The work on the bridge will begin in mid-April and be substantially complete by the end of 2026,” Ahern said. “The detour will be in place for almost the entire construction period.”

Local drivers will be able to use nearby roads and emergency responders will plan routes using the detour map provided by the town.

According to project documents filed with the town’s Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission, the existing bridge will be removed and replaced with a twin pre-cast concrete box culvert system designed to improve drainage and reduce flooding risk.

The project calls for a northerly 20-foot-span culvert with an 8-foot rise and a southerly 20-foot-span culvert with a 5.5-foot rise, serving as an overflow opening.

The new structure will also improve the roadway. Plans call for a minimum roadway width of 29 feet, including two 12-foot travel lanes and a 5-foot shoulder. The bridge will include a metal rail system that meets current safety standards.

Officials say the improvements are expected to prevent flooding on roadways during major storms. The design will also provide additional space between stormwater levels and the bridge structure during a 100-year storm event.

In the weeks leading up to construction, residents may notice several types of preparation work in the area.

“Tree removal started last week,” Ahern said.

Additional early work will include surveying, utility mark-outs, installation of detour signs and the arrival of contractor equipment and materials.

The project is located in a residential neighborhood. Nearby residents will likely notice daytime construction activity once work begins. Demolition of the existing bridge and excavation for the new structure may create noise and increased truck traffic in the area.

Funding for the project comes primarily from federal and state sources, Ahern said.

“This is being funded under the Federal Local Bridge Program administered by the CT Department of Transportation,” he added. 

Under the program, the project will be paid for through a reimbursement process with 80% federal funding and 20% state funding.


New Haven will pursue acquisition of former English Station power plant after alders approve

Mark Zaretsky

NEW HAVEN —The city will move forward with acquisition of the former English Station power plant site in the Mill River off Grand Avenue to eventually build a park and outdoor pool.

 The Board of Alders approved the plan, which calls for New Haven to acquire the former United Illuminating plant and Ball Island, the contaminated 8.6-acre island it is built on, either through a negotiated sale or eminent domain, Monday night via a voice vote. 

Six or seven alders voted against the measure, according to two alders who spoke in opposition to the plan prior to the vote.

"I cannot vote for a grand vision that prioritizes speed over ... the safety and well-being of the people," said Fair Haven Alder Frank Redente Jr., D-15, prior to voting.

Redente said afterward, "I feel like we've done our due diligence," but the city still doesn't know how much cleanup of the site will cost. "It's still being litigated. We don't know what we're getting in for," he said.

"I don't want to say that I'm not in favor of a park there ... but it doesn't smell right," Redente said. He said he knew of at least six alders who voted against the measure.

One of them, Fair Haven Alder Sarah Miller, D-14, who said she worked with the mother of Hill Alder Angel Hubbard, D-3, more than 20 years ago to close down English Station, said, "I would love for this site to be cleaned up. I think we all would love for it to be cleaned up."

Her problem was with the process "to sell this to the community rather than to find out what the community wants," Miller said. "That process didn't happen. So I can support a plan that I have heard from many of my constituents that this is not what the people want."

Miller said she knew of a total of "six or seven" alders who opposed the acquisition measure.

East Rock Alder Anna Festa, D-10, said that "as much as I want to support the acquisition of this property, I think there's still too many outstanding questions," including price and where the money would come from, as well as the total cost of remediation.

"I'm not ready to vote on this item yet until those questions are answered," she said.

Hill/City Point/Downtown Alder Carmen Rodriguez, D-6, chairwoman of the board's Community Development Committee, pointed out that the committee voted to support the acquisition after hearing public testimony.

The alders' approval came with an amendment put forward by Democratic Majority Leader Richard Furlow, D-27, to establish an acquisition working group which will include both alders and representatives of Mayor Justin Elicker's administration

"I urge colleagues to support this project as amended," Furlow said, pointing out that the question at hand was simply whether to acquire the property, While the vote authorized the use of eminent domain if necessary, it did not authorize either details of the development or the price of acquisition, which come later, he said.

Morris Cove Alder Leland Moore, D-18, also spoke against the measure.

"While I support" acquisition, "I have concerns about the ultimate costs," said Moore. So "at this time, absent any additional information ... I am opposed."

Among those who spoke in favor were Hubbard, who said it let's the city "have a seat at the table," and Westville Alder Adam Marchand, D-25, who said that in its current state, the English Station property "is not producing anything productive for the community. We want to change that," he said.

The acquisition scenario was laid out in a Jan. 9 letter and proposed order from Economic Development Administrator Michael Piscitelli to Board of Alders President Tyisha Walker-Myers, seeking the alders' approval to obtain Ball Island, which the state has expressed willingness to remediate.

The order authorizes the city to enter into negotiations with the owners, Paramount View Millennium, LLC and Haven River Properties, LLC, to purchase the property, which the city wants to name "Park at Mill River." 

But it contains this additional language:

"BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that if it is not possible to negotiate the terms and conditions of a mutually acceptable conveyance with the owners of the English Station Parcels, then the mayor is hereby authorized to direct the filing of eminent domain proceedings by the city in order to obtain fee simple title to the English Station Parcels, in accordance with the authority granted by, and the requirements set forth in, the City of New Haven’s Charter and the Connecticut General Statutes."

Representatives of the two owners have not responded to requests for comment.

Elicker has said his goal is to reach agreement for a negotiated purchase of the property and he still hopes to do that.

"First of all, the goal is NOT to have to use eminent domain and we're negotiating with the owner in good faith," Elicker said in January. Eminent domain "is in my view a tool that should be used very sparingly and should be used only as a last resort" and for a very important public purpose.

United Illuminating operated English Station as a coal- and oil-fired power plant from 1929 until 1992. The site is contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), a known carcinogen, heavy metals, and other contaminants, state Attorney General William Tong's office has said.

According to the administration's cover letter to the alders, "The new Park at Mill River will feature the city’s first outdoor public swimming and aquatics facility as well as new opportunities for active and passive outdoor recreation in an unparalleled coastal environment."

City officials have shared conceptual plans for the park -- which are only concepts and could change -- at two public meetings.

The New York City-based Roxanne and Henry Brandt Foundation has expressed interest in contributing up to $10 million toward the project, the New Haven Independent reported.

Funding for the acquisition is anticipated to come out of a Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development Urban Act grant, which was awarded to the City for Mill River district initiatives, and accepted by the Board of Alders on September 3, 2024, the letter to the alders states.


Revolution Wind nears completion, State Pier in New London still bustling

Greg Smith

New London — Revolution Wind, the offshore wind project off the coast of Rhode Island, may be nearly completed, but it hasn’t stymied activity at New London’s State Pier where its components were marshaled.

Danish company Ørsted, which partnered with Global Infrastructure Partners’ Skyborn Renewables on the Revolution Wind project, recently announced that Revolution Wind started delivering power to the New England electrical grid and will be scaling up in the coming weeks.

Meanwhile, State Pier still remains crowded with offshore wind components — 400-ton power generating nacelles, blades nearly as long as a football field and towers that will stand 800 feet above the water once assembled. The components are eventually bound for New York’s Sunrise Wind, an Ørsted project situated in the federal lease area south of Martha’s Vineyard that is projected to be operational by 2027.

Construction on Sunrise Wind is already well underway despite delays — including a government-ordered shutdown in December that halted five offshore wind projects under construction and prolonged the completion of Revolution Wind. All projects have since resumed construction.

Ørsted says Revolution Wind is 90% completed with 60 of the project’s turbines fully installed. Ørsted reports that 44 of the 84 turbine foundations for Sunrise Wind are installed to date and turbines are expected to be installed in the near future. Sunrise is a 924-megawatt project expected to supply power to 600,000 homes in New York.

Connecticut Port Authority Executive Director Michael O’Connor said the pier is active now, but the port authority has already been looking ahead for uses of the newly renovated pier and its potential to host cargo other than offshore wind components.

The Connecticut Port Authority owns the pier, which is managed by Enstructure. Ørsted has a 10-year-lease on the pier with options to extend the lease and sublease to other companies.

“Today it's pretty full. We've been regularly receiving two to three shipments a month. I expect that to continue at the same pace through the middle of next year,” O’Connor said.

But what happens in the near future at State Pier remains uncertain. O’Connor said he’s not so sure anyone is racing to approve new offshore projects at this moment. The port authority continues to explore other uses for the facility, which he said can accept an array of cargo and is situated close to a freight rail line. O’Connor said he envisions a dual use for the pier, which would allow an offshore wind company to work alongside another company.

“We're in the exploration phase right now," O'Connor said.

The only hurdle in negotiating with a company looking to move cargo through the pier is the uncertainty of the timeline for Sunrise Wind because of the possibility of another delay in construction. He said he expects that there will be more clarity in the coming months.

“Working together with our partners, we'll figure out what might be the best use of the available space at the pier," O'Connor said.

Revolution Wind's announcement of it producing power last week was hailed as a landmark achievement. When it is fully operational, Revolution Wind is projected to supply 704 megawatts of power, enough to light up 350,000 homes. Both Rhode Island and Connecticut have 20-year power purchase agreements — Connecticut for a 304-megawatt share of the power.

ISO New England, the nonprofit organization that runs the New England electric grid, reports that as of March, wind energy accounted for 7% of New England’s electricity.

Gov. Ned Lamont said in a statement that Revolution Wind is “key to diversifying our energy supply and lowering utility costs for families and businesses.”

“I congratulate the project’s developer and the many skilled Connecticut workers who’ve made Revolution Wind possible on achieving its first power deliveries to the grid,” Lamont said.

Katie Dykes, the commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, predicts that offshore wind will eventually save money on electrical bills.

“As we’ve seen from the harsh winter we’ve had, and the impacts to fossil fuel prices as a result of the Iran war, having diverse sources of stable, reliable power that both perform strongly in the winter and are insulated from geopolitical events is beneficial to Connecticut ratepayers,” she said. “These first power deliveries are an important milestone, with greater benefits yet to come as the project heads to completion and full operation later this year.”

U.S. Rep. Joe Courtney, D-2nd District, said the cost of this new locally generated power, at 9 cents per kilowatt hour, "is far less than the average of 30 cents per kWh in our region.”

“Crucially, because this wind energy is directly transmitted off the coast of New England, its price will not be at the mercy of uncertain global energy markets,” Courtney said in a statement.


Electric Boat redevelopment, student housing project near UConn seek $8.25M in tax relief

Greg Bordonaro

A Connecticut Innovations committee this week will consider approving up to $8.25 million in sales and use tax exemptions tied to a major Electric Boat redevelopment project in Waterford and a large off-campus student housing development near the University of Connecticut.

The quasi-public agency’s loan committee is scheduled to vote Wednesday on two proposals under the state’s Connecticut Sales & Use Tax Relief Program, which allows certain economic development projects to receive exemptions from the state’s 6.35% sales tax on capital equipment and construction materials, up to a specified amount.

The largest request would provide up to $5 million in sales and use tax exemptions for General Dynamics Electric Boat, tied to the renovation and repurposing of the former Crystal Mall property at 850 Hartford Turnpike in Waterford.

Electric Boat, the Groton-based submarine manufacturer owned by General Dynamics, acquired the mall property last year and has begun shutting down most of its retail operations as it prepares to convert the site into office and support space.

The company plans to use the property for engineering, training and software development functions, eventually housing several thousand workers, including some relocated from Groton and New London and others hired to support the Navy’s Virginia- and Columbia-class submarine programs.

The proposed tax exemption would apply to construction materials and other purchases associated with the redevelopment project.

The committee will also consider approving up to $3.25 million in sales and use tax exemptions for The Mark at Mansfield LLC, the developer of a large off-campus student housing complex near UConn’s Storrs campus.

The project, known as The Mark Mansfield, is planned to include about 1,350 student beds across several parcels near North Eagleville Road, along with about 7,000 square feet of retail space.