November 25, 2025

CT Construction Digest Tuesday November 25, 2025

Hartford auto dealership property sells for $3.15M to affiliate of site-work contractor, power-equipment vendor

Michael Puffer

An affiliate of a Windsor-based site-work contractor and a West Hartford power-equipment retailer has purchased a former Mitsubishi dealership property on Hartford’s New Park Avenue for $3.15 million.

According to a deed recorded Nov. 5, a limited liability company tied to BCI Inc. — which operates as The Butler Co. — acquired the 3-acre parcel at 398-412 New Park Ave. from an LLC affiliated with the Crowley Auto Group.

The site includes a 26,143-square-foot dealership building constructed in 1988 and recently vacated by a Mitsubishi franchise that had been leasing the property.

The deal was completed as part of a 1031 tax-deferred exchange.

ADVERTISEMENT

Principals of the buying entity include Robert, Thomas and Timothy Butler — the president, vice president and a project manager at BCI, respectively.

The family also owns Butler Equipment, a power-equipment retailer located a short distance down New Park Avenue in West Hartford. The store sells landscaping and construction machinery ranging from lawn mowers and leaf blowers to excavators and loaders.

BCI provides site-work services to public agencies, developers, higher-education institutions and healthcare organizations.

The firm’s portfolio includes work on Lowe’s stores in Cromwell and Bloomfield; a Home Depot in Bristol; Dick’s Sporting Goods in Manchester; aerospace facilities in Windsor Locks and Bloomfield; the University of Connecticut in Storrs; and General Dynamics Electric Boat in Groton, according to its website.


New Greenwich High School swimming pool could cost $57.4M, open in 2029

Ignacio Laguarda

GREENWICH — A new swimming pool at Greenwich High School could cost $57.4 million and be ready to open in late 2029.

The new facility, if constructed, would replace the current 1970s-era high school pool, which has a number of limitations, including narrow decks and a ceiling too low for diving or water polo.

“We understand there is a great urgency behind addressing the issues with the pool," said Lisa Yates, design team architect for Antinozzi Associates, during a meeting of the Greenwich Board of Education on Nov. 20.

Back in February, Greenwich Public Schools Facilities Director Dan Watson informed the Board of Education that the current pool would need renovations, including a new drain. The district then hired Chester-based TLB Architecture to create a report outlining the pool's deficiencies and ways to fix them. That report found that some parts of the pool were not fully compliant with federal law and health code regulations. 

Ultimately, a feasibility committee — comprised of school officials, one Board of Education member, the high school athletic director, swimming coaches and community members, among others — was formed to come up with recommendations.

That committee studied a number of alternatives and the most popular option was constructing a brand new building to house a new pool only a few feet south of the current pool structure. One benefit of the plan is that it would allow for the current pool to remain in use while the new building is being constructed, allowing for the swim program to continue uninterrupted.

Yates said that was a major consideration, since members of the swim program adamantly opposed closing the pool during any construction.

Another popular option among committee members was building a new facility at the site of the current one, while relocating the swimming program. However, that option would only be about $2.6 million cheaper than the recommended choice.

The new building, if constructed, would be roughly four times as big as the current pool structure. It would feature a 35-meter pool as well as a shallow area required for swimming and lifeguard electives offered at the high school. The ceiling height would allow for all types of aquatics programming, including diving and water polo.

The height of the ceiling in the existing pool is too low to allow for diving according to National Collegiate Athletic Association regulations.

The new proposed building would also have a number of amenities not currently available to swimmers and spectators, such as dedicated locker rooms for both home and away teams, an alumni room, bathrooms, a lobby with a ticket office and an entire mezzanine seating area for an overhead view of the action.

The current pool only offers seating on the pool deck used by swimmers, a violation of health code regulations. Further, the deck was deemed insufficient in the TLB report because it is too narrow and fails to meet accessibility and emergency access requirements.

The new structure would be built where the tennis courts are south of the high school. That creates another issue, as the district would have to find a new home for the courts and the school's tennis program. One solution discussed at the meeting is constructing new courts at North Street School, which is one-and-a-half miles away.

Board chair Michael-Joseph Mercanti-Anthony said cost is a major consideration with the project. At the meeting, many people who spoke during the public comment section brought up the school budget and proposed cuts to it.

"The irony is not lost on me that we’ve had an hour worth of public comments about our operating budget and the cost of the operating budget and cuts to the operating budget and we’re talking about a significant capital expenditure that dwarfs any reductions we're making," he said.

Mercanti-Anthony said he would not support the project without a "significant private donation" to help pay for the cost.

Yates recognized that the price of the project is a key consideration.

“This is an expensive endeavor no matter how you look at it," she said.

The Board of Education is set to vote on the educational specifications of the proposed pool in December. 


Vacant lot at prominent CT gateway acquired for $1.3M. ‘It’s a real eyesore.’

Kenneth R. Gosselin 

Even the governor has asked what’s going on at this site.

Now, a vacant lot at a prominent gateway to downtown Hartford — created nearly 15 years ago with the demolition of Broadcast House — has been sold for $1.3 million after the previous owner failed to redevelop the site at the foot of the Founders Bridge.

The buyer, Hartford Steam Boiler, is headquartered just across Columbus Boulevard from the half-acre lot at 3 Constitution Plaza, which is now an eyesore surrounded by a chain link fence.

“HSB’s land acquisition was a strategic decision to preserve the value of our headquarters at One State Street,” HSB spokesman Dennis Milewski said, in a statement Monday. “We would entertain a higher use value for the property but otherwise are looking to build additional street level parking for employees. We look forward to improving the general conditions of this corner in downtown Hartford.”

The property has long been considered a strong candidate for a new hotel because it is a short walk from the convention center. The city lost hundreds of hotel rooms in the pandemic, now hamstringing its ability to attract large conventions and other big events. The city is looking to rebuild its stock of hotel rooms.

In past year, the specialty insurer — owned by German reinsurance giant Munich Re — has taken an interest in the lot, commissioning a mural to spruce up the site. The mural’s focal point is a powerful locomotive, evoking HSB’s roots in boiler breakdown insurance, a train still part of HSB’s logo.

HSB also invested in the opening of a new, upscale restaurant, The Foundry, atop its headquarters building.

The sale was recorded in the Hartford town and city clerk’s office late last week.

Hartford Mayor Arunan Arulampalam said late Monday the city looks forward to a new chapter for a property that the city has wanted very much to see redeveloped.

“For all Hartford residents, that’s felt like a real eyesore, right as you get off the highway and entering into downtown,”  Arulampalam said. “In my first couple months being mayor, it’s something the governor had mentioned to me and mentioned to me several other times. It’s a property that we’ve been very interested in, trying to get under responsible control and try to get a number of developers to look at.”

Earlier this year, Arulampalam said the city had been approached about negotiations between the previous owner of the long-vacant lot at the southeastern corner of Constitution Plaza — Abul Islam, founder and chief executive of Middletown-based AI Engineers — and potential developers of a new hotel. Those negotiations were in the earliest stages.

Islam could not be reached for comment late Monday.

The corporate investment in Constitution Plaza provides a boost at a time when the future of a large chunk of the 1960s-era complex is surrounded by uncertainty.

The court-approved foreclosure last month of a majority of Hartford’s Constitution Plaza is expected to open up options for the future, but just how redevelopment unfolds — or over what period of time — is the next chapter in the plaza’s long struggle to find a niche in the half century since it was built.

Islam put the property up for sale a little over two years ago, listed without an asking price.

Islam purchased the property at 3 Constitution Plaza in 2008 and announced splashy plans for a 12-story, $40 million office tower.

But those plans were subsequently downsized and, at one point, office space was combined with apartments. A hotel also was considered for the site. Each of the plans went nowhere, financing and falling demand for office space a constant obstacle.

Islam paid $700,000 for the property, $1 million below its original listing price. In 2008, Islam told the Courant he was investing $2 million to buy the property and demolish Broadcast House, a distinctive sight in the city with its scalloped roof.

The building had stood vacant and deteriorating since WFSB/Channel 3 moved its broadcast studios to Rocky Hill in 2006.


Revolution Wind work goes on as Trump administration misses deadline

John Moritz

The Trump administration missed last week’s deadline to appeal a federal judge’s decision ordering work to resume on the Revolution Wind project, handing another victory to advocates and local officials who have fought to keep the project afloat.

Construction of the of the 704-megawatt wind farm — which is being staged from the State Pier in New London — was allowed to resume on Sept. 22 after U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth ruled that the federal government lacked justification when it halted work on the project earlier this year.

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, which issued the stop-work order, had 60 days to appeal the judge’s decision. That deadline passed on Friday, Nov. 21 with no action taken by the federal government.

“The Trump administration is rightly choosing not to continue to defend the indefensible,” Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said in a statement Monday. “Trump’s erratic actions were the height of arbitrary and capricious government action, and their decision not to pursue this defense is further confirmation of that. This is a major win for Connecticut workers and Connecticut families.”

A BOEM spokesperson declined to comment Monday.

In response to a series of questions seeking clarity on whether the administration was dropping its opposition to Revolution Wind, White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly provided a statement that included no mention of the project or the court ruling.

“In just a few months, President Trump has ended Joe Biden’s war on American energy and restored American energy dominance,” the statement read. “This means prioritizing the most effective and reliable tools to power our country, which includes following through on his promise to ‘Drill, Baby, Drill’ and unleash domestic oil, gas, and nuclear power — supporting thousands of good-paying energy jobs across the country.”

Revolution Wind was already 80% complete when the stop-work order was issued in August. All the foundations for the project’s massive turbines had been driven into the seafloor.

The Trump administration cited unspecified national security concerns as its rationale for halting the project. The project’s proponents said it had undergone extensive reviews during the years-long permitting process, which included approvals from the federal Department of Defense.

Revolution Wind’s developers, which include Danish energy company Ørsted, filed suit challenging the stop-work order in federal court in Washington, D.C.

Lamberth, the judge in the case, was appointed to the bench by former President Ronald Reagan. In remarks from the bench in September, Lamberth chided the the government for failing to provide evidence to support its order, which he called “the height of arbitrary and capricious action.”

“There is no question in my mind of irreparable harm,” Lamberth said, adding that the developers were required to meet strict deadlines to get the project up and running.

Since work resumed in September, the project has progressed to around 85% completion, according to Ørsted’s most recent quarterly earnings report. Construction is currently slated to finish in the second half of 2026.

A spokesperson for Revolution Wind declined to comment on the government’s decision not to appeal Lamberth’s ruling.

second lawsuit challenging the federal government’s action against Revolution Wind was filed in September by Tong and his counterpart in Rhode Island, Democratic Attorney General Peter Neronha. That case remains pending as of Monday.

The project employs nearly 1,200 workers across both states, according to the lawsuit, including more than 100 jobs at the State Pier in New London. The wind farm itself is located in federal waters off the coast of Block Island.

Both Connecticut and Rhode Island also signed agreements to purchase the power produced by Revolution Wind once it is online. Under the terms of its contract, Connecticut’s utilities will purchase up to 304 megawatts for $99 per megawatt-hour.

Separately this week, another federal judge in Washington, D.C. is considering whether the Trump administration erred in its decision to halt all approvals for future offshore wind projects, according to Reuters. Trump announced that order as part of a flurry of executive actions upon his return to office on Jan. 20.