March 31, 2020

CT Construction Digest Tuesday March 31, 2020

Shelton looks to its past for tomorrow’s transportation
Brian Gioiele
City officials are looking to bring a part of the past back to transport residents from new housing and development centers downtown to local restaurants and services.
Assistant P&Z Administrator Josh O’Neill said modern trolleys — essentially modified and fancifully decorated buses — would be a perfect niche offering to move people back and forth from the eateries and commercial establishments in downtown and Bridgeport Avenue.
O’Neill has presented the plan to Mayor Mark Lauretti and local developers and business leaders and has gotten rave reviews. He now plans to survey the seven local hotels and other businesses about their needs with the aim of developing a partnership that could aid in covering the costs, whatever they may be.
“The intent of the proposal is to create an alternative method of travel throughout the city,” said O’Neill. “This would be designed to connect and integrate major areas of the city as well as ease parking needs and traffic loads in the downtown.”
Trolleys are a vestige from the Valley’s past, but the idea to bring them back started a few years ago with local businessman Mathew Calandro and Lauretti. While the idea went dormant, the trolley concept is again picking up steam thanks to O’Neill and downtown development chief Ken Nappi.
“There really seems to be a large buy-in to this,” said Nappi. “It is exciting to see we are going back to a mode of transportation that was created for the same reason we need it — to move people, economic development, make the downtown better.
“This is really a home run,” added Nappi, formerly the city’s interim P&Z administrator. “I get emotional about this. People put millions into downtown, into Bridgeport Avenue, and now to be able to move people to benefit economic traffic … it’s a fantastic thing.”
O’Neill said trolleys would be a way to get the general public to and from the apartments downtown to all the establishments along Bridgeport Avenue.
Shelton’s city landscape is changing. Construction has begun on two new developments with retail and apartments downtown. Plans are moving forward on adding apartments along Canal Street, and Fountain Square on Bridgeport Avenue will add an eighth hotel and numerous restaurants and retail shops.
All the development comes with a need for more parking and better traffic control, officials said. A trolley service could help.
“This would be a service by the city of Shelton in partnership with the developers and business community to move people for economic development while easing traffic flow and parking issues,” said Nappi. “The key to it is who is going to run it and who is going to pay for it? We will need a partnership between the city and the businesses to make this happen … everyone involved needs to have a stake in this.”
Nappi said his meeting with city officials and developers went so well that the mayor offered to start such a service this summer.
Lauretti said he could offer use of two old Valley Transit buses — purchased last year by the city — to run loops from downtown to Bridgeport Avenue and back, with strategically placed stops for passengers.
“This is something the city has needed for a long time,” said Calandro — especially with what will be an explosion of new businesses and some 700 downtown apartments coming online over the next several months.
“We have parking downtown, but there are so many people, some 30,000 commuters on Bridgeport Avenue, that do not know the area,” added Calandro. “Right now, there is no reason for them to go past Constitution Boulevard. To be able to offer an option to bridge the gap between Bridgeport Avenue and downtown is very exciting.”
The hope is to purchase two additional vehicles already built as modern trolleys. Estimates received a few years ago valued one trolley at $133,000. Calandro said annual costs, factoring in fuel, maintenance and drivers’ salaries for running one trolley Thursday through Saturday, was between $50,000 and $75,000.
But both O’Neill and Calandro said there are numerous opportunities with so many interested hotels, restaurants and retail for generating advertising revenue to help cover costs.
O’Neill said the goal is a free service, with some 22 passengers on each trolley run. If a charge is ultimately needed to help cover costs, O’Neill said the idea would be to keep it identical to Valley Transit, about $2 to $3 a trip.
The operation would offer flexible hours and routes, with weekday and weekend hours — all dependent on input received during the initial survey process.
O’Neill said the city’s initial planning has taken pointers from the Harbor Point Trolley in Stamford, which connects the Harbor Point development to downtown Stamford. The difference is that the city of Shelton would oversee the trolley operation, while a private developer handles the Stamford trolley.
One aspect of Stamford’s system that O’Neill said intrigues him is that it is free and there is a live shuttle tracker app that can be downloaded on people’s phones to give updates on trolley locations and arrivals in real time.
O’Neill said that no official Shelton route has been set, but he hopes to keep loop runs no longer than 20 minutes. He also is looking into using the Greater Bridgeport Transit bus stops for the trolley stops, since the state Department of Transportation does not allow stops in the middle the roadway.
“We want to make this service as convenient as possible for everyone who wants to use it,” said O’Neill.

Dillon says quiet Bradley Airport could benefit from $2T federal stimulus
Sean Teehan
$2-trillion stimulus package Congress passed last week could provide Bradley International Airport aid at a time when airlines and passengers are canceling flights amid fears of the rapidly spreading COVID-19 virus, Bradley's overseer says.
During a Friday afternoon board of directors meeting for the Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA), which oversees Bradley, CAA Executive Director Kevin Dillon touted an element of the legislation that provides $10 billion to airports, $7.4 billion of which has few strings attached.
"They're not restricting the money for capital projects or operating expenses, it can be spent on anything that we lawfully have to spend money on here at the airport," Dillon said.Half of that money will be allocated based on 2018 employment levels, and the other half will be distributed based on the amount of debt and reserves airports have, Dillon said.
Dillon said the $58 billion allocated to passenger and cargo airlines will support hard-hit air travel companies, and require organizations that accept bailout money to maintain at least 90% of payroll staff through the end of 2020.
Bradley has seen a significant dropoff in passenger traffic amid the COVID-19 crisis -- as much as a 90% decrease on some days. Dillon told board members Friday that the airport's numbers aren't unique.
"The drop in activity here at Bradley mirrors very very closely what's happening at airports all around the country and particularly in Boston and New York," Dillon said.
However, Bradley's cargo business has seen very little disruption, Dillon said. The airport's cargo business has grown significantly in recent years, especially with Pinnacle Logistics, which ships packages for Amazon, moving into the airport in 2018.
Cargo volume at Bradley spiked by 24.5% in 2019 to 367 pounds of materials shipped.
Bradley, which receives rental and landing fees from freight carriers operating on its grounds, recorded $9.2 million in cargo-related revenue in 2018. By comparison, it earned only $2.9 million in fiscal 2017, which ran from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017.
"Some projects will continue on, because they're required for regulatory purposes, or safety and security," Dillon said. "Others we will partially defer… and then other projects have outright been discontinued for the time being."
It was not immediately clear if that includes the airport’s $210-million ground transportation center project, which broke ground last July.



March 30, 2020

CT Construction Digest Monday March 30, 2020

Work to start soon on Sunnyside Street Bridge
Matt Grahn                                    
NORWICH — Patrick McLaughlin, director of Public works in Norwich, said it’s important for Norwich to have well-maintained bridges.
“We have to provide safe infrastructure for our residents and anyone traveling in Norwich,” he said.
McLaughlin said work on the Sunnyside Street Bridge in Yantic is expected to start on April 13. He describes the project as a rehabilitation project, preserving many of the existing features. The project cost is currently around $1.49 million. The contractor, Mattern Construction Inc., has 196 calendar days to complete the project.
When the project starts, there will be limited access to the bridge on some days. In a form handed out by McLaughin, he stated the contractor will inform residents 14 days in advance of limited access. On those days, the bridge will be closed from 9 a.m. to noon, and 12:30 p.m. to 3 p.m.
In the event of an emergency during those hours, crews can give the contractor five minutes notice to make the bridge passable by using steel plates and wooden ramps.
Norwich Mayor Peter Nystrom said to help emergency crews, an old fire engine will be kept by the bridge past the Yantic River.
“Members can respond with that vehicle there, and still provide fire service,” he said.
For the restoration work, the project will focus on repairing the parapet walls and the central bump-out walls, rehabilitating the guard towers, repaving the bridge and approach roadways, and installing a pre-cast concrete deck with a waterproofing membrane, and a new concrete sidewalk.
Nystrom said it is important to maintain the Sunnyside Street Bridge, since it is the only way to access a Yantic neighborhood from the rest of the city.
“It’s totally isolated,” he said.
Nystrom also said it was important that the project will make historically mindful repairs.
“It is a very historic structure, with all the granite used,” he said.“When the project is all done and the new surface is on the road going across the bridge, it will be just as it was.”
The Sunnyside Street Bridge isn’t the only one being worked on. Another bridge, on Route 97 over Cold Brook in Norwich, is being replaced. According to a press release from the state Department of Transportation, the project will be completed in October.
The release states that bridge is in poor condition, and “is functionally-obsolete and is considered hydraulically inadequate.”
In order to replace that bridge, that section of Route 97 is expected to close from June 9 to Aug. 24.
Along with replacing the bridge, other improvements will be made, including new drainage, new signing, the instillation of metal beam rails.
The City of Norwich is also looking forward to a larger bridge project in the future, being the replacement of the Sherman Street Bridges in 2022. The total cost of this project is $10 million, most of which will be paid by the federal government.

Beacon Falls to bond for road repairs, sewage treatment plant improvements
ANDREAS YILMA
BEACON FALLS – Town officials are looking to bond $6 million to pay for road repairs and improvements to the wastewater treatment plant.
The Board of Selectmen and Board of Finance approved separate resolutions this month to borrow $5 million to pay for road work, including storm water drainage and sewer improvements, and another $1 million to make improvements at the treatment plant.
First Selectman Gerard Smith said bonding is the best way to pay for the work.
“Bonding is the mechanism to do all capital projects,” Smith said.
Officials have been exploring how to approach a large-scale project to repair roads in town for over a year. The town hired StreetScan, Inc. of Burlington, Mass., last March to study the condition of 100 roads in town to determine what work needs to be done to which roads.
Smith said some of the money for road work, if officials get the voters’ approval to borrow the funds, would go to pay for repairs to Beacon Valley Road. The town already has $500,000 in state funds set aside to fix the road from Beacon Valley Bridge to the Naugatuck town line.
Smith said what other roads would be fixed with the $5 million is still to be determined.
The wastewater treatment plant, which is over 40 years old, is outdated, officials have said. The planned work at the plant would include electrical upgrades and replacing a generator.
The Planning and Zoning Commission and the Water Pollution Control Authority have to approve the resolutions still. Officials had hoped to send the resolutions to a vote at a town meeting in April. However, the COVID-19 outbreak stalled the process as town buildings are closed and meetings have been canceled. It’s unclear when the process will get back on track.

March 27, 2020

CT Construction Digest Friday March 27, 2020

DOT releases figures on how much traffic has decreased
Tim Murphy
Earlier this week, Kevin Nursick, the director of communications for the state Department of Transportation, had a question for a colleague who works on road-construction sites.
“I asked him how he would classify the reduction [of vehicles] now that people are staying home because of the coronavirus,” Nursick said. “He said he thought it was down by about one-third from typical rates.”
That was an underestimate.
Connecticut’s daily traffic volume was down more than 38 percent (from the same date last year) for the most recent six-day stretch (March 19-24) measured by 21 automated traffic counters that operate continuously at various sites on state roads, including I-95, I-84, I-91, and the Merritt Parkway.Traffic volume was lower by more than 43 percent on three consecutive days (March 21-23) before increasing to negative-38.6 percent on March 24, the most recent day for which statistics were available.
“If you look at the numbers you see that the trend really started on March 13, when traffic volume was down 12.3 percent,” Nursick said. “A few days later it was down by a little more than 20 percent, and then it really got lower after that.
“It’s pretty obvious that the reduced traffic volume coincides with people working from home and only going out when they really need to,” Nursick added. “March 13 looks to be the day people began staying off the roads.”
Many schools and businesses have closed temporarily during the last two weeks, and an executive order issued by Gov. Ned Lamont that went into effect Monday night requests that all non-essential businesses have their employees work from home.
“It’s likely that the traffic volume will remain much lower for a while,” Nursick said. “People are heeding the warnings about coronavirus and not leaving the house.”
The break in traffic is allowing the DOT to facilitate construction work on its Route 8/I-84 Interchange (Mixmaster) rehabilitation project in Waterbury, with lane closures extended to weekdays and weekends.
“That’s the irony of the situation, that more work can be done without causing traffic delays,” Nursick said. “We are looking into whether we could do the same with some of our other projects.”                                
Less traffic has also meant a workload reduction for AAA Northeast, which services three counties (Fairfield, New Haven, Litchfield) in Connecticut.
“We’ve seen a 40 percent drop in volume,” said Fran Mayko, a Triple A Northeast spokesperson. “That is for our region, which also includes Rhode Island, Massachusetts, parts of New York, including New York City and Long Island, and a portion of northern New Jersey. But it’s probably safe to say that the service calls are down around 40 percent in Connecticut. Most of the calls are for cars with dead batteries in people’s garages, driveways or parking spots.”
Mayko said that AAA (which is considered an essential business) has installed protocols for its service calls.
“If someone is stranded, the tow driver can’t give that person a ride, which is something we were able to do previously,” Mayko said. “We will help the person find a ride — we are not going to leave them on the side of the road — but we can’t drive them home.”
For those drivers who still must commute to work, a silver lining awaits at the pump. Thursday’s state average price of $2.22 per gallon (of regular gas) is the lowest in Connecticut since Aug. 16, 2016, according to Mayko.
“It dropped two cents overnight and is down 33 cents from this time last month and 48 cents from this time last year,” Mayko said. “It’s a good time if you need to fill the tank.”

Frey backs state bond package with $1 million for Ridgefield
With $1 million for Ridgefield, money to fight the COVID-19 outbreak, and for engineering work on Route 84 exits in Danbury, a $166 million state bonding package won the support of State Rep. John Frey (R-111), despite some misgivings about some of the other spending it supports.
Frey joined his colleagues in support of what his office described as “a long-overdue bond package to provide promised, and much-needed, funding for municipal road repair, school construction, municipal projects and more.”
“After months of delays while the governor tried to get his tolls plan through the General Assembly,” Frey’s office said, the $166 million package (HB 5518) for both fiscal year 2020 and ’21 that passed March 11 provides $1,094,838 in total aid to Ridgefield, and includes funding for Town Aid Road (TAR), Local Capital Improvement (LOCIP) and grants for municipal projects. It represents a slight decrease of $25,324 for fiscal years ’20 and ’21, Frey’s office said.
“This plan is certainly not perfect, with small decreases in funding to Ridgefield and the addition of several items that are very problematic for me to support, but overall this is a good plan for the state and will release the long-awaited Town Aid Road and municipal funding cities and towns depend on,” Frey said.
I-84 engineering“This plan also includes funding for engineering work to begin widening I-84 in Danbury between exits 3 and 8 which will bring faster commutes and reduced traffic congestion.”
Rep. Frey agreed with provisions in the plan that provide funding for what he called important transportation projects, bridge repair and replacement, school constructions grants, municipal aid, increases in funding for non-profit agencies, open space programs, and more.
The package was not unveiled in full until a few hours before debate began in the General Assembly, Rep. Frey said and it includes provisions he disagreed with, including $65 million to refurbish Hartford's XL Center, specific funding for Workforce Development in Bridgeport and Hartford, brownfield remediation for one small town in Eastern Connecticut and cleanup of a waste site in Hamden.
Republicans called an amendment to the package that would have preserved vital funding for Town Aid Road, school construction, public universities, while at the same time stripping earmarks in the underlying bill for the XL Center, the towns of Preston and East Hartford, and others. That amendment failed on a mostly party-line vote, Frey’s office said.

Connecticut added 4,000 jobs in February, while unemployment held steady in the state’s last month before being struck by the COVID-19 pandemic, according to preliminary data released Thursday by the state Department of Labor.
February’s numbers built on promising results in the previous month. January’s originally calculated job increase of 2,600 was revised up to 3,300.
At the same time, Connecticut’s unemployment rate ran at 3.8 percent, compared with 3.7 percent in January. The national rate ran at 3.5 percent last month.
“This was the sixth month in a row of payroll job growth. Unfortunately, with the impact of the spread of the COVID-19 virus, we can expect payroll jobs to decline as a result of sharply increased layoffs and furloughs,” said Andy Condon, director of the Department of Labor’s office of research, in a written release.
In the past year, total employment (not including agriculture) in the state grew by 13,300 positions, equal to a 0.8 percent gain.
The gains are likely to be wiped out, in the short run at least, by the coronavirus crisis. Since Friday, March 13, well over 100,000 people have filed for unemployment benefits. The department has pushed the expected processing time from three days to more than two weeks, and has not released new figures for unemployment claims.
In February, just over 40,000 people were receiving jobless benefits.
The gains of the first two months of 2020 could be revised even without the effects of the coronavirus crisis. In 2019, the state initially reported a gain of 6,500 jobs, based on annual averages compared with 2018. That was later revised by the department to a loss of 2,100. State unemployment last year averaged 3.7 percent, in line with the national average.
In the 12 months ending in February, education and health services led all sectors with a 2.2 percent year-over-year job gain. Next came professional and business services with an uptick of 1.3 percent.
Construction, financial activities, government, information, manufacturing and trade, transportation and utilities each recorded year-over-year job increases of less than 1 percent.
Leisure and hospitality and the “other services” category were the only groups to lose jobs in the past year, as both saw their statewide headcounts drop by less than 1 percent.
“This was a difficult vote because of the increased borrowing for earmarks and other projects I don’t feel are best funded with tax dollars, however it is a more responsible plan than in many previous years, comes in underneath the bond cap and provides funding to combat the recent Covid-19 outbreak,” Rep. Frey said. “I would like to see the governor truly put his ‘debt diet’ into place and curtail non-essential borrowing, but this is a good start.”

New highway ramps planned on Route 15 in Orange
Jim Shay
Work will soon begin on a highway improvement project on Route 15 at Route 34 in Orange.
The $7.1 million project will include a northbound Route 15 acceleration lane from Route 34 westbound and a southbound Route 15 deceleration lane onto Route 34 westbound.
“The existing median on Route 15 will be reconstructed for road widening and a concrete median barrier will be installed,” the state Department of Transportation said in a release.
“The southbound Route 15 Exit 58 off-ramp will be realigned east of its current connection to Route 34 and a traffic signal will be installed to control traffic. The off-ramp will have two lanes to allow for double right turns onto Route 34 westbound.”
Work is set to begin on or about April 1.
Construction activities will require a detour at the Route 15 Exit 58 northbound on-ramp during weekday nighttime periods for four weeks beginning at 9 p.m. and ending at 5 a.m. the following day.
The Route 15 Exit 58 southbound off-ramp will require a detour during weekday nighttime periods for one week beginning at 9 p.m. and concluding at 5 a.m. the following day.
The Route 15 ramps will not be closed concurrently and traffic will be detoured using local roads.
The project awarded to Tilcon Connecticut Inc. of New Britain, will be finished in December 2021.

Torrington starts road projects March 30
TORRINGTON — Public works crews are scheduled to begin road reconstruction projects March 30, with work continuing through mid-July.
Officials said the improvements will include new asphalt paving, asphalt curbing, driveway aprons, catch basins and tops and associated work.
The public is to expect daily traffic delays due to one-way alternating traffic and daily road closures allowing local traffic only. Pass through traffic is advised to avoid these roads and use alternate routes.
Construction will start with Section 1 and continue in sequence through Section 3.
Residents are asked to avoid parking on these roads during construction. Vehicles in the way of construction will be towed at the owner’s expense, officials said.
For more information, contact the City of Torrington Engineering Department at 860-489-2234 or visit the Engineering Department website link for Construction Projects 2020 at torringtonct.org.
Section 1 projects will include Adam Drive, Birney Brook Road, Judi Terrace, Lynn Heights Road, Parson Terrace, Planet Street, Roberts Street, Starview Drive and Thomas Street.
Section 2 includes Gale Court, Heights Drive, Juniper Court, Lawrence Lane, Overlook Court and Winesap Run.
Section 3 covers Hyde Street, Martha Street and Weed Street and Newbury Place.

CT homebuilding permits up 23% in February
Joe Cooper
Connecticut homebuilders pulled more municipal permits to erect new housing in February, marking the seventh consecutive monthly increase, new data shows.
There were 370 single- and multifamily permits issued last month in 104 towns and cities, up 23% from 301 in Feb. 2019, according to the state Department of Economic and Community Development (DECD), citing U.S. Census Bureau data.
Among communities sampled, the most permits were issued last month in Fairfield (97 permits issued), Shelton (34), Simsbury (33) and East Lyme (25).
Fairfield has recorded the largest number of permits issued in 2019 -- 101.
It remains to be seen how the COVID-19 coronavirus could disrupt housing construction activity nationwide as the outbreak has forced people to shelter at home.
Home construction has already been slowed in certain parts of California, which has recorded more than 2,100 cases of COVID-19, according to multiple media reports.

Here’s how coronavirus rescue bill boosts unemployment benefits

Washington –  As the coronavirus emergency pushes the unemployment rate to historic heights, Congress is rushing to give the jobless an unprecedented amount of money to help them cope.
The massive stimulus bill approved by the Senate and now before the U.S. House would give unemployed workers an additional $600 a week in benefits, above what they are eligible to receive from their state. Those increased benefits would continue for the next four months.The extra money would be distributed by state unemployment offices. They would have the option of providing the state and federal contributions in one payment, or sending the new federal benefits separately. But both payments must be sent on the same weekly schedule, according to the bill.
Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., said the new “supersized” unemployment program “will be a lifeboat to many people in Connecticut.”
In Connecticut, the maximum weekly benefit is $649. Under the coronavirus rescue bill, that would jump to $1,249.
The bill would give federal benefits to workers who have never before been eligible for help. It would create a new program called Pandemic Unemployment Assistance for self-employed, part-time and contract workers who are typically ineligible for benefits. Neither would it require beneficiaries to be actively looking for work.
Furloughed workers, those in quarantine because they have COVID-19 or fear they have the virus, are also eligible. So are workers who have had to leave their job because they are taking care of someone who is sick or tend to children who are no longer in school or daycare because of closings. A worker needn’t have been employed for a certain number of weeks to receive benefits, and new hires are eligible, as are those who have already exhausted their state unemployment benefits.
However, workers who are able to work from home, and those receiving paid sick leave or paid family leave, would not be covered.
 
 
The expansion of unemployment insurance is designed to put money quickly and directly into laid-off people’s pockets in the hopes that they will be able to keep paying their bills and feeding their families and won’t be ruined financially by the pandemic.
Many states have a one-week “waiting period,” meaning that the first week a person is unemployed, they get no benefits. The stimulus package pushes states to waive that period by paying the full cost of that week of benefits.
But it’s unclear how long it would take Connecticut to process claims — especially since the Connecticut Department of Labor is strained by a flood of applications.
The second coronavirus bill, approved by Congress on March 18, contained $1 billion to help states quickly process claims and get money out to people so they could spend it and shore up a sinking economy.
Connecticut’s Department of Labor did not respond Thursday to questions about how much it received from the federal government or how fast it could process the federal benefits. It has reported hiring dozens of additional staff to cope with the flood of applications.‘Going through the roof’
Nationally, unemployment claims for last week shot up to a record 3.3 million, nearly five times the historic weekly high 661,000 set at the height of the Great Recession.
Connecticut has about 100,00 claims last week due to coronavirus closings, the Connecticut Department of Labor said on Wednesday.  That’s up from a recent average of about 2,500 claims a week in the state.
“The [unemployment claims] are going through the roof,” said Gov. Ned Lamont in an interview with Yahoo Finance this week.  “The computer system has reached its threshold a couple of times right now.”
Zachary Cohle, an economics professor at Quinnipiac University, said the nation’s unemployment rate is most likely around 10 percent right now. “We expect to see higher unemployment as even more businesses lay off workers as the lockdowns across the country continu
e,” he said “We could even see an unemployment rate around 30 percent in the near future.”
While the federal government is pushing to protect the unemployed, Cohle said there is a need to focus on creating more jobs after the lockdowns are over. “Workers can only be unemployed for so long,” he said.
The stimulus package also revives “Emergency Unemployment Compensation,”  a 100% federally funded program established in the last recession that provides benefits to individuals who have exhausted regular state benefits, which in Connecticut last 26 weeks.
Unemployed workers will now have an additional 13 weeks of benefits, for a total of 39 weeks.
Unemployment benefits are usually funded by federal and state taxes on employers. But the federal government’s unemployment fund is not large enough to cover these more robust benefits, forcing it to go into deficit spending.

March 26, 2020

CT Construction Digest Thursday March 26, 2020

DOT: Arrigoni Bridge traffic will be 1 lane each direction
MIDDLETOWN - Beginning Monday, traffic on the Arrigoni Bridge will required will be reduced to one lane in each direction.
The state Department of Transportation said construction in the first stage of rehabilitation of the bridge will mean a concrete barrier will be installed to reduce the number of travel lanes from two, to one lane in each direction.
“During this stage, traffic will be shifted to one lane in each direction on the southern portion of the bridge allowing for continued traffic flow while construction crews perform work on the northern side of the structure behind concrete barrier,” DOT said in a release.
“It is anticipated that this configuration will remain in place until December. Upon completion of this stage, traffic will then be shifted to each outside lane of the bridge for one lane of traffic in each direction, while work is then performed in the center portion of the structure behind concrete barrier.”
For additional information about the project, please visit www.arrigonibridgeproject.com.
 
NEW BRITAIN – Phase 1 of the Columbus Commons Apartments has been completed.
“Tenants have already started moving in and leasing is ongoing,” said Katie Cardillo, Marketing Director, Dakota Partners.
Located off Columbus Boulevard, the brand new Columbus Commons Apartments is a mixed-used space offering 80 apartment homes spanning five floors. The building has a fitness center, community gathering space and bike and tenant storage. In addition to the apartments, it offers 10,000 square feet of commercial storefront for small neighborhood businesses.
“We don’t have any tenants for the retail spaces yet, but are having discussions with different businesses,” said Katie Cardillo, Marketing Director, Dakota Partners. “We have plans for a second phase, but no date to start yet.”
This new affordable housing community was designed by Paul B. Bailey Architect LLC. It’s six stories and was built according to Passive House standards – a set of energy efficient building principles that utilizes heavy insulation, airtight building envelope and heat-recovery ventilation systems to reduce overall energy consumption. According to the Passive House Institute US database, Columbus Commons is one of the first mixed-use, multi-family communities built to Passive Housing standards in the State of its standards in Connecticut.

Avangrid CEO announces retirement plans
Luther Turmelle    
Avangrid officials announced Thursday that CEO James Torgerson will retire in June after the Orange-based company’s annual shareholders meeting.
Torgerson, 67, has led Avangrid since it was formed five years ago through the merger of Iberdrola USA and UIL Holdings. Before that, he served for nine years as president and chief executive officer of UIL Holdings, which was based in New Haven.
The company is conducting an internal and external search for Torgerson’s successor.
“Jim has successfully led the integration of Avangrid, making the company a leading sustainable energy group in the U.S.,” said Ignacio Galan, chairman of the board for the energy holding company. “His long and successful career is widely recognized by his peers in the industry.”
Torgerson said that while he has been contemplating retiring for a while, he is “fully engaged and committed to leading this organization as we navigate the current challenges of the coronavirus pandemic.”
“We are well prepared and committed to ensuring there is no interruption in service for our customers and taking care of our employees during this uncertain time,” he said.
Torgerson came to UIL Holdings from a stint as president and chief executive officer of the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, one of the nation’s regional electric grid operators.
He presided over a period of dramatic growth for UIL Holdings, taking it from a small, regional energy holding company to what it has become today as Avangrid, a diversified energy company with 3.3 million natural gas and electric utility customers across multiple states and one of the largest wind power generators in this country.
Avangrid was created after Spanish energy giant Iberdrola acquired UIL Holdings at the end of 2015 in a $3 billion deal. Before that merger came along, Torgerson had tried to expand UIL Holdings by acquiring Philadelphia Gas Works in 2014.
But the Philadephia City Council rejected that $1.85 billion deal in October 2014 and the company abandoned the acquisition attempt a few months later.
Torgerson served as chairman of the American Gas Association in 2019. He is a current trustee of the Yale New Haven Health System.

Stonington will not fund two bridge replacements
Joe Wojtas           
Stonington — The proposed 2020-21 budget calls for permanently closing one bridge in town and not replacing another, possibly leading to its eventual closure and a detour.
The budget, which was approved by the Board of Finance last week and sent to a public hearing next month, calls for spending $15,000 to permanently close the North Stonington Road bridge, which has been closed since the March 2010 flood. It would have cost the town $318,000 to replace the bridge with the Town of Groton, which recently said it would pay for half of the work.
Meanwhile, the finance board eliminated $377,500 to help fund the town’s share of replacing the deteriorated Lantern Hill Road bridge over Whitford Brook. The town had an agreement with the Town of Ledyard to split the cost, as the small span straddles the border of both communities.
Board members cited their concern that a large number of taxpayers could be laid off due to the coronavirus, leading to a decrease in tax revenue, as a major reason for slashing the proposed capital improvements budget. The proposed overall town and school budget now calls for a 0.24-mill tax rate hike.
North Stonington Road Bridge
The decision to permanently close the bridge, located just west of the Old Mystic Fire Station, would end a long-running but unsuccessful effort to first repair and then replace it. An initial project to repair it was halted when crews doing the work discovered the engineering design had not accounted for the true extent of damage. And in years when Stonington appropriated additional money for the work, Groton did not. This year, Groton said it would but now Stonington has decided not to appropriate the needed funding.
Old Mystic Fire Chief Ken Richards and a group of Old Mystic residents have pressed the two towns for years to reopen the span. Richards has repeatedly said that without the bridge, his trucks responding to calls are forced to drive down Main Street and try to make a difficult turn onto Route 27 at the Old Mystic General Store. At times, due to cars and delivery trucks parked along the street or at the intersection, the firetrucks are unable to make the turn and must instead use Route 184, delaying their response by more than four minutes.
Richards said on 409 occasions in 2019 his trucks were dispatched to the Groton side of the fire district, requiring them to try and make the turn onto Route 27.
In addition, the closure means firefighters are unable to access the closest hydrant in the area and need three times the length of hose, which would require the closure of Main Street, Route 27 and Shewville Road while hampering the ability of emergency vehicles to reach a scene on North Stonington Road.
Richards’ repeated warnings to the two towns about his safety concerns could create a liability problem for the town in the future, if a firetruck is delayed in responding to a call and someone is harmed.
“This is definitely not an acceptable outcome for the fire district,” Richards said this week about the decision to close the bridge.
A total of 125 neighbors have signed a petition and the fire district’s attorney has sent letters on two occasions to the towns about the need to replace the bridge.
Richards said he and other supporters of replacing the bridge plan to attend the upcoming public hearing on the budget to push for the allocation of the money. That hearing has been scheduled for April 9 at 7:15 p.m. at the high school but that could change due to coronavirus precautions. Lantern Hill Road bridge
While not many people live along Lantern Hill Road, it is a popular shortcut for people to get from Mystic to Foxwoods Resort Casino.
The initial capital improvement proposal had called for allocating $377,750 in 2020-21 and another $377,750 in 2021-22 to replace the bridge, with the state reimbursing the town for 50% of the cost.
While the town had an agreement with Ledyard to split the cost of the project, Stonington First Selectwoman Danielle Chesebrough told the Board of Finance last week that Ledyard officials had been “good neighbors” and let the town out of the agreement.
As of now, she said, the bridge is not failing and plans are to keep it open. She said the town is looking at some creative solutions to do that. These could include weight limits, alternating one-way traffic or closing the bridge with a gate and providing emergency responders with access to a lock box to get over the bridge.
At this point, Chesebrough said it is not clear how long the bridge can stay open. If it does have to close, drivers traveling north or south on the road and want to get past the bridge will need to take a detour estimated to be about 10-12 minutes along Shewville Road and Route 214.
Chesebrough said she has reached out to the Mashantucket Pequot tribe about sharing the cost of any project, as some of its patrons use the road.

 

March 23, 2020

CT Construction Digest Monday March 23, 2020

When working from home isn’t a choice: Manufacturers, construction companies, warehouses and prisons among the employers operating despite coronavirus

Unlike office employees who take their laptops and smart phones home to help tamp down the spread of coronavirus, workers in factories, warehouses, construction sites and prisons must stay put.
Sherine Bailey, a correctional officer at the Carl Robinson Correctional Institute, a medium-security prison in Enfield, said the state Department of Correction is making available plenty of cleaning supplies, and outside volunteers and visitors are restricted.
“At home, we’re stepping up precautions. Coming into work, you’re hoping everyone is on the same page,” said Bailey, who spoke as a member of Local 391 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. “At the end of the day, we’re essential staff. We’re needed.”For manufacturers navigating through a pandemic, that puts pressure on workers’ health, the supply chain and even cash flow at small businesses. Meeting deadlines and filling customer orders is a challenge.“Everyone is nervous,” said Jason Jarvis, president of Jarvis Airfoil, a family-owned manufacturer of fan, compressor and turbine blades and vanes for military and commercial jet engines.Interactions between workers at the Portland plant are moved to larger places from small offices to make it harder to transmit the virus, Jarvis said. Such shop floor changes are easier for machine workers who are “naturally distanced from each other,” but it’s more difficult to impose on supervisors and inspectors who work more closely with other employees, he said. In addition, all points that are routinely touched, such as doorknobs and surfaces, are cleaned regularly, and any of the 91 employees who don’t feel well are urged to stay home. Understanding that many employees work paycheck to paycheck, he said accommodations are made to allow use of vacation time to account for time off related to health. Seeing a “great thirst out there for information and guidance,” Eric Brown, vice president for manufacturing policy and outreach at the Connecticut Business & Industry Association, said 120 manufacturers participated in a conference call Monday to discuss best practices. Participants discussed the need for a “pandemic flu plan administrator,” “pandemic flu plan team,” the effect of “mission-critical system failures” and employee absenteeism, supply chains and other issues related to keeping a business going during a public health emergency. Jet engine maker Pratt & Whitney, among the largest manufacturers in Connecticut, has imposed travel restrictions, self-quarantine procedures, employee social distancing, remote work, flexible schedules, enhanced paid leave and “continuous and comprehensive deep cleaning and disinfecting” of the plant and offices, said Michele Quintaglie, spokeswoman for parent company United Technologies Corp. Construction companies have put similar plans in place, said Don Shubert, president of the Connecticut Construction Industries Association, which represents large commercial construction companies. Job site meetings are kept as small as possible or are conducted by phone or videoconferencing, he said. Hand washing stations are being established, and people congregating is discouraged, Shubert said. He’s nervous what the pandemic might do to the industry’s well-being. While service businesses have been devastated by the virus that forced movie theaters, restaurants and other public places to shut, employment in Connecticut’s construction industry was flat before the coronavirus flared up. The industry’s 59,800 workers in January were down from 60,000 in January 2019, according to the state Department of Labor. A spokesman for UPS said workers who exhibit symptoms are asked to seek medical care and to not come to work. The shipper’s large facilities have several shifts, and workers are assigned to work stations that are spread across the facility. Greater distance between workers is characteristic of UPS’s “more highly automated facilities,” he said. A spokeswoman for the Teamsters union, which represents UPS workers, said sorting facilities are “unlike a bar, restaurant or more contained area” that allow for distancing.

Norwich appoints committee for major school renovation project
Claire Bessette             
Norwich — A new school building committee was established this week, but city officials cannot yet say when or how the group will start working to plan for a major building consolidation and renovation project.
The project, deemed a top priority to evaluate, renovate or close some of the city’s 15 aging and costly school buildings, would have to be put to voters in a referendum in a year or two. The new committee is not expected to meet until May, and officials are unsure whether the initial meetings will be in person or by telephone, given the ongoing concerns about the COVID-19 virus and the closure of City Hall.
City Council President Pro Tempore Mark Bettencourt, a member of the council’s Appointments/Reappointments Committee, said he was pleased with the quality of applicants, especially with the number of new people who have volunteered for the committee.
“We have a lot of new blood,” he said. “It’s nice to see a group that’s not the same old faces. I’m please. The thing that stood out was we had such a good quality group of candidates.”
The council voted unanimously Monday to appoint: Norwich Public Schools teacher Gregory Ballassi; former Alderman Gerald Martin, a master electrician; Sprague school Superintendent William Hull; community member Peter Gauthier and retired U.S. Coast Guard civil engineer Gregory Carabine.
Additionally, City Council members Bettencourt, Derell Wilson and Stacy Gould, Board of Education Chairwoman Heather Romanski and board member Christine Distasio and City Manager John Salomone were appointed as ex-officio members.
The council expects to appoint one more Norwich teacher, as one candidate withdrew from consideration.
Hull said he has lived in Norwich for most of his life and said the school buildings were “tired” years ago when his three children attended.
“I just wanted to give something back,” he said. “I live in Norwich. My kids grew up here. This is important to me.”
In his more than 30 years as a school administrator in various eastern Connecticut districts, Hull has served as an ex-officio member of school building committees and served in districts when major renovation projects were underway.
Hull served as Salem superintendent for 17 years, headed the Lyme-Old Lyme schools for three years and was a principal and assistant superintendent in Montville during a major renovation project for all school buildings. He was superintendent in Putnam for 10 years, including a time when Putnam High School underwent a $36.5 million renovation, he said. Hull started in Sprague in August as a part-time superintendent. He doubled as an interim principal for a time at the start of the school year.
The new school building committee will start with the report and recommendations of the School Facilities Review Committee, which approved a plan last summer that was a modification of a plan rejected by the City Council in May 2017.
The plan calls for renovating as new the John B. Stanton, John Moriarty and Uncas elementary schools and building a fourth new elementary school, all to house preschool through fifth-grade students. The proposed new school building would accommodate 300 to 600 students, preferably in a Greeneville, Laurel Hill or East Side neighborhood.
The Teachers’ Memorial Middle School would be renovated as new for grades six through eight, as would the recently renovated Kelly Middle School.
The two current preschool centers, the Bishop School and Deborah Tenant-Zinewicz School, would be closed and listed for sale. Bishop also houses several school offices and technical departments. Those would move to Samuel Huntington School, which would close as an elementary school and house administrative offices and the Norwich Transition Academy, a vocational program for special education students aged 18 to 21.
The Thomas Mahan Elementary School, located in a prime commercial area off Route 82, would be closed and listed for sale.
The central office building, the historic 1895 former John Mason School at the Norwichtown Green, also would be closed and listed for sale. The Hickory Street School, which houses the Norwich Transition Academy, also would be listed for sale.

State Pier occupants granted 120-day extension to stay in New London
Greg Smith           
New London — State Pier operator Gateway has extended the deadline for port tenants to move out, giving commercial fishermen and a major local road salt distributor an extra four months to find a new home.
The extension is not coronavirus related, rather the result of negotiations among Gateway, the Connecticut Port Authority and tenants who were expecting to be displaced March 31 to accommodate the offshore wind industry. Construction activity associated with a $157 million planned overhaul of the port is expected to begin later this year as it converts into a wind turbine staging area for joint partners Ørsted and Eversource.
Connecticut Port Authority Chairman David Kooris said while pre-construction activity at the pier still is expected to start soon, the extension was made possible in part because of the ongoing work by the construction company Skanska, which is using the pier as a staging area for work across the river at Electric Boat in Groton.
Skanska, in a joint venture with Trevcon II, is performing work as part of EB’s expansion to accommodate assembly of ballistic missile submarines. Skanska, in an October news release, said the contract is worth $89 million. Kooris said Skanska, while it is at the pier, is able to cover the basic costs of keeping the facility open, expenses such as security and insurance.
Companies occupying State Pier, including Gateway, had planned to leave the site by March 31. The agreement between the Connecticut Port Authority and Ørsted-Eversource has halted all incoming cargo ships and the ability for Gateway to recoup costs of running the pier.
“We wanted first and foremost to figure out if there was a way to accommodate them further,” Kooris said.
Gateway President Jim Dillman said DRVN Enterprises, two commercial fishermen working off CV Pier and Blakeslee Construction all will have 120 days beyond the original March 31 deadline.
While there is a four-month extension, Kooris said all parties are clear that any further extensions are unlikely. Skanska's time at the pier also was extended through the end of July.
Chris Bachant, president of Carpenters Local 326, has extended membership with his union and work for all of the eight full-time longshoremen, members of the International Longshoremen’s Association 1411, working at the pier. There will be work while construction at the pier, expected to last two years, is ongoing. The 45 part-time longshoremen have either found other work or are looking for jobs.
DRVN still has a massive pile of salt, an estimated 95,000 tons, on site, which eventually will have to be moved. DRVN President Steve Farrelly said his company continues to look for a suitable alternative site.
“We are diligently looking for locations but the process for zoning and planning and any other permitting required in all towns for our use has slowed down dramatically due to the necessary precautionary (measures) being taken to date due to COVID-19 pandemic,” Farrelly said in an email.
Dillman and Farrelly would not confirm whether there is an existing agreement between their two companies that would allow Gateway to transfer the salt to its own operation in New Haven. Dillman said business with customers is private and covered by nondisclosure agreements.
Mayor Michael Passero said he has been working to find out if moving the fishing boats to Fisherman’s Pier, on the city’s waterfront, is feasible. He said the new extension buys some more time to work out those details.
“We certainly need more time because the city does not want to lose these commercial businesses and we are still actively working to find a solution so that they can remain in New London preferably, but most importantly a place for them to stay in business,” he said.
Kooris said while permitting is not yet in place for the full pier redevelopment project, some of the work expected to be accomplished in the coming months includes excavation, building demolition, test borings and other site preparation work.

March 20, 2020

CT Construction Digest Friday March 20, 2020

Obviously construction news this past week has been somewhat slow to say the very least. The sooner we get through this virus the sooner we can get back to our regularly daily lives. Be safe and stay healthy. N

Outlook improving in New Britain Downtown District
Catherine Shen
NEW BRITAIN - Things are looking up in the New Britain Downtown District as several residential housing units are being filled and businesses are coming in.
About 200 new residencies are expected to be filled by the end of the year, according to Bill Carroll, the city’s director of the Department of Economic Development. “The unexpected growth in residential and businesses is a good sign.”
One of the popular draws has been the Columbus Commons mixed-use project, which has approximately 160 residential units and 20,000 square feet of commercial space. The state had approved a $5 million loan to project stakeholders that helped with the construction of 60 new units of workforce housing. With proximity to CTFastrak and downtown, the mixed-use development will add to this city’s transit oriented development. The city is expecting all leases to be signed by early April.
“In some ways, we’re keeping ahead of the curve in terms of getting both residential and commercial projects in,” said Gerry Amodio, executive director for the district. “We’re hoping with the transit system, new businesses and new residential units, we can become integral for people who are looking for a place to live.”
Other ongoing and completed residential projects include 222 Main St., Courtland Arms, the Doris Building, the Packard Building, the Berkowitz Building and the Andrews Building.
“We’re getting what we need to create a dynamic downtown, which is what we’re working towards,” said Justine Moriarty, chairwoman of the district. “Of course, there’s always work to be done. But it’s good that we have ongoing movement.”
The Energy and Innovation Park is also considered one of the most significant private sector investments in state history, according to the district. The park will construct a 19.98 megawatt fuel cell grid on the Stanley Black & Decker campus, which upon completion will generate tax revenues upwards of $45 million for the city throughout a 20-year span.
With all the new and diverse projects going on, both Amodio and Moriarty hopes it will contribute to the changing face of the city. They also want to attract projects that have a focus on the arts in the near future.
“There is a resurgence of interest in the arts from the youth and we’d like to focus on that,” said Moriarty. “Young people want experiences and we hope to give them those experiences with our downtown.”

 

March 18, 2020

CT Construction Digest Wednesday March 18, 2020

After $98M loss, Ideanomics weighing future of West Hartford project
Matt Pilon
Ideanomics’ “Fintech Village” project in West Hartford has faced various delays over the past two years, but now the company has added a new level of uncertainty to the purported $400-million development.
Ideanomics told investors on Monday that it has identified the Fintech Village at the former West Hartford UConn campus as a “non-core asset” and is “evaluating its strategies for divesting of this asset.”
Slipped into its annual earnings filing with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission, the disclosure came as Ideanomics reported a $98.5-million loss in 2019, up from $27.4 million in 2018. The company’s shares were trading at all-time lows of around 37 cents on Tuesday morning, down from $1.77 a year ago.
“Fintech Village, we’re taking a long, hard look at that,” CEO Alf Poor said on an earnings call Monday. “It’s been a much longer, slower grind through the approvals process.”
The company did not elaborate during the call. However, in a statement Tuesday, Poor said Ideanomics is "committed to find the best way forward to bring Fintech Village to its full potential and bring tech jobs to West Hartford."
"What began as a light remediation project has turned into a major undertaking," he said. "As such, we are shifting from a go-it-alone approach and are currently looking for partners to co-invest in the development of Fintech Village."
The Department of Economic and Community Development (DECD) has pledged up to $10 million in assistance for the project, but that funding is contingent on job creation targets. To date, Ideanomics has not drawn on any of the money, DECD confirmed Tuesday.
Ideanomics bought the 58-acre campus in Oct. 2018 for $5.2 million. Contamination, including  asbestos and polychlorinated biphenyls, was soon discovered to be higher than expected, requiring demolition of four of the five buildings on the property.
McGovern said the company needed to work through approvals with state and federal environmental regulators before work could resume.
Only one of the four buildings on the property has been demolished as of Tuesday.
The company’s most recent update, issued late last year, was that the work would be finished in the second half of 2020.
“If we elect to sell, transfer or change the use of the facility, additional environmental testing may be required,” Ideanomics said in an SEC filing. “We cannot assure that we will not discover further environmental contamination, that any planned timeline for remediation will not be delayed, that we would not be required by [state or federal environmental agencies] to incur significant expenditures for environmental remediation in the future.”
“The surety bond will either serve as collateral to the state if we do not complete the environmental remediation to state and federal requirements or be returned to us in full if remediation efforts are successful and completed,” Ideanomics said in the recent filing.
While Ideanomics unveiled a virtual fly-through of Fintech Village last summer, revealing an expansive development with numerous buildings and public spaces, the layout was only preliminary.
Once remediation work is finished, Ideanomics would still need to apply to the town for a zoning change to accommodate a specific design.

Aquarion plans water line work in Stonington
Stonington — Aquarion Water Company has announced that additional water main replacement projects are scheduled to begin March 23 on Marjorie Street and Lantern Hill Road in Mystic, followed by Linda Avenue, Summit Street, and Elm Street.
The work is expected to be completed by mid-June.
The company said the projects, which will replace 3,050 feet of water main, are part of an ongoing program to improve its distribution system and ensure high quality water. It said the upgrades also will help to reduce leaks and water main breaks.
During construction, drivers should expect minor traffic delays and possible detours from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.
To keep customers informed about scheduled/unscheduled work, Aquarion utilizes a CodeRED notification system to call affected customers. Customers can sign up for the free service at bit.ly/AquaOut.

Work begins on Meadow Street portion of $19.1M construction project
MICHAEL PUFFER 
WATERBURY — Construction work begun recently on Meadow Street is part of a $19.1 million project to refurbish Jackson, Meadow and Freight Street.
The project is intended to help the city entice development in a roughly 70-acre area around Freight Street. It’s funded with a $14.4 million federal grant and $4.7 from city taxpayers.
Construction workers have spent nearly two weeks digging under a sidewalk near the corner of Meadow and Freight streets. These test pits are meant to help pin down the location of underground utilities ahead of more extensive work, said Salvatore Porzio, a project manager with the city’s Department of Public Works.
Meadow Street will be repaved, with new storm drainage basins and refurbishment of some sewage lines, Porzio said. That paving is expected to begin in late spring or early summer, Porzio said.
Upgrades to Freight Street were completed in 2018 under contractor Dayton Construction.
The city picked Guerrera Construction to rebuild Jackson and Meadow Streets. It’s contract calls for “substantial completion” by July 31, with a complete finish by Nov. 13.
Work on Jackson Street last week prompted the city to close a section of Bank Street by its intersection with Jackson. Porzio said contractors are tying in utilities at the mouth of the street.
Advertisement
Jackson has long been a short, broken and seldom-used stub of a street that dead-ended underneath the Mixmaster. The ongoing project will see it repaved, with new utilities and a sidewalk, pushed all the way through Freight Street and onto intersect with West Main Street.
Paving on the entire length of Jackson Street, including the new section, should begin this spring following the installation of sewer, water and electric lines, Porzio said.

Lamont admin. in early talks about economic stimulus package
Greg Bordonaro
ov. Ned Lamont’s economic development team is in talks with state lawmakers about a potential stimulus package, but what gets proposed will likely depend on how long the coronavirus public health scare goes on, a top administration official told Hartford Business Journal.
“We are having conversations with the legislature and it’s on the front burner,” said David Lehman, commissioner of the state Department of Economic and Community Development. “If the economic impact from this is longer and broader than what I think it should be, then everything is on the table, whether that is a new program similar to what was done at the beginning of the Lamont administration where we worked with the banks on a new small business lending fund [for federal workers impacted by the government shutdown] or something else.”
“The longer economic activity slows down the harder it is to get the economy started,” Lehman added, talking Monday by phone from his Greenwich home. (Lehman, who is also Lamont’s top economic adviser, says he will be working from home some days and be in Hartford others as the COVID-19 pandemic continues to spread throughout the state.)
Lehman said so far he approves of his bosses handling of the outbreak and that an aggressive response is needed to reduce the longer-term economic harm.
“We have to take our medicine quickly to make sure we recover quickly both from a health and economic perspective,” Lehman said.
 Lehman said he can’t predict how bad of a hit the economy will take but he doesn’t think it will be as bad as the Great Recession in terms of unemployment. However, the state and nation could see a loss of output equivalent to that time period.
He said he’s seen estimates of up to a 7% to 8% decline in output, which would be the worst decline since the fourth quarter of 2008, when the financial crisis really began spinning out of control.
“The real question in my mind is the duration of this thing, is it a two to three to four month thing or a six or nine month event,” he said. “It’s my view that this is certainly having a big impact but there is no precedent for this where parts of our economy literally stop. What’s challenging here is that what is right from a public health perspective is counter to the way our economy is set up and works.”
First, is what the state and his agency can do right now to respond through executive order or without any legislative approval. DECD has already announced a loan forbearance program for any companies that currently have state government loans. The Department of Labor is also making broader use of unemployment insurance benefits and the U.S. Small Business Administration announced on Monday that Connecticut small businesses are now eligible for federal emergency loans of up to $2 million.
Second, is determining what residents and businesses are going to need in the medium term if they don’t get benefits already available to them from the state or federal governments.
Third, is figuring out what to do to stimulate the economy when we are at the tail end of the health crisis.
Lehman said he and other administration officials are in talks with legislative leaders about potential programs, whether they be incentives or tax credits, but nothing is finalized yet largely because the situation is fluid and there is no clear sign of how long the pandemic and downturn will last.
“This is not a financial crisis,” he said. “Banks have a lot of liquidity.”




March 16, 2020

CT Construction Digest Monday March 16, 2020

Gov. Lamont signs long-awaited bonding bill into law
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — Gov. Ned Lamont has signed into law a long-awaited borrowing package, which includes key funding for Connecticut cities and towns.
The bill easily cleared the General Assembly on a bipartisan vote on March 11, despite criticism from some Republican legislators that the deal negotiated between the Democratic governor and legislators spends too much.
“From investments in local education to capital projects to long overdue improvements in our state’s infrastructure, this bond package makes smart investments, all while holding the line on borrowing and maintaining our commitment to being fiscally responsible," Lamont said in a written statement.
Lamont has said Connecticut needs a “debt diet,” arguing that curtailing borrowing by nearly 40%, to less than $1 billion annually, will ultimately boost economic growth. But Senate Republican Leader Len Fasano of North Haven noted the legislation authorizes $1.55 billion in fiscal year 2020 and $1.52 billion in fiscal year 2021 for projects such as school construction, local aid and infrastructure improvements. The state averaged nearly $1.6 billion in annual bond authorizations when former Democratic Gov. Dannel P. Malloy was in office. Max Reiss, Lamont's spokesman, noted that authorizations in this proposal, depending on the type, are down 11% to 19% compared to Malloy's tenure. The borrowing bill, which includes funding for numerous municipal projects, was supposed to have been passed during the last legislative session. However, it got tied up in the debate over highway tolls.

Connecticut Port Authority planned a dual-use State Pier, until it didn’t
David Collins
Logistec, a Canadian-based shipping terminal operator that works in 34 North American ports, managed and grew the cargo business at New London's State Pier for 20 years, with a peak of 400,000 metric tons of cargo and 33 ship calls in 2018.
But by the end of 2018, Logistec was sent packing, rejected in a competitive bid process by the Connecticut Port Authority, which chose instead the operator of New London's closest competitor, the privately owned Gateway Terminal of New Haven.
Predictably, I suppose, in the same way you would expect McDonald's to close a Burger King next door, if it could, Gateway has closed New London's State Pier to cargo, probably for the first time in more than a century. It has moved a lot of the business to its own terminal, where it doesn't pay the state a cut. Other cargoes have moved to Providence.
The stated reason for the closure and the firing of New London union longshoremen, some on the job for decades, is to make way for construction of a new wind turbine assembly facility, an enormous project for which not one state or federal permit has been issued.
This was certainly not the plan announced back in 2018, when the port authority said it was going to choose a manager for State Pier who would both grow traditional cargo and also make way for the needs of the emerging wind industry.
Indeed, the official request for proposals, or RFP, issued by the port authority called for bidders to propose a way to use State Pier for both traditional cargo and wind turbine assembly. A specific objective was to better use the pier to get freight off congested highways.
But somehow, in what seems to me to be a deeply flawed and inherently unfair process, the port authority chose not an operator proposing to manage a dual-purpose port, as the RFP demanded, but one that has instead closed the cargo business down, to its own competitive advantage.
I reached out to Logistec, the publicly traded company that I'll call the principal victim of this dishonest bid process, but Frank Vannelli, senior vice president of commercial development, said the company is still bound by nondisclosure agreements it signed in making a bid.
He did respond in writing to some questions, limited, he said, by the agreements, and suggested the company did not want to engage in sour grapes.
He noted in the written answers that the company responded to the RFP as written and proposed a dual-use port that would have used a floating flexiport to accommodate the wind components.
"We were ready to displace all other cargoes to adjacent property nearby or contiguous to State Pier property and keep the rest for the wind cargo when ready for development," he said.
So what happened between the spring of 2018, when then port authority Chairman Scott Bates, the deputy secretary of the state, said they were preparing for a dual-purpose port "that could pivot one way or the other" between cargo and wind, to when the announcement of the deal with Gateway was made in early 2019?
"This deal positions New London as a wind power hub," Bates said in 2019, traditional cargo evidently left by the wayside.
Logistec executives, who played by the rules and submitted plans as requested in the solicitation for bids, must have seen the writing on the wall when they turned up for the official RFP interview, and neither Bates nor the authority's executive director were there to participate.
Vannelli confirmed, when I asked about the interview, that the agency's chairman and full-time director both skipped it.
What an insult to a company that had been a strategic partner with the state in the operation of the port for the last 20 years and which participated in the bid process when it was announced.
I asked in an email to port authority officials whether there were any negotiations with Gateway before the final decision was made. Such talks would have violated the RFP rules and disqualified the respondent making a bid. I wonder, in the absence of such talks, how the Gateway bid could have been the ultimate winner with a predominately wind plan, given the specific requirements for a dual-use port envisioned in the RFP rules.
Current port authority Chairman David Kooris, who was not on the board at the time, said he is not aware of any negotiations with the bidders during the RFP process. Bates did not respond.
The final concession agreement with Gateway specifically envisions a time when "all or a portion of the port facilities and site" might be used for wind energy work.
How did a plan and request for bids, explained by Bates as having the aim to "pivot" between wind and cargo, end up producing a predominant wind plan in the final concession agreement?
And how is it that the port authority, in the middle of the RFP process, commissioned an international engineering firm to estimate the costs of remaking State Pier as a wind assembly terminal, in the same way that Gateway and the authority ultimately agreed to do it? The estimate, for $349 million, is dated July 2, a time when the port authority was not supposed to have any talks with the bidders except within the interview framework of the RFP.
I got the distinct impression that Logistec has moved on and doesn't plan any legal contest to the dishonest bidding process. A lawsuit would reveal more of how New London didn't end up with a port that can pivot.
More of the puzzle of the story may still be revealed in time, though.
Port authority critic Kevin Blacker has been working to interest federal regulators in anti-trust aspects of the deal.
And there are other victims of the port authority's elimination of competition for New Haven's politically connected port operator.
DRVN Enterprises, the road salt company that Logistec brought to State Pier, has been issued an eviction notice and may no longer be able to compete with the salt business Gateway runs in New Haven.
The competition DRVN brought to Connecticut substantially lowered the cost of road salt for municipalities in the region, a savings that likely will be lost once that competition is wrung from the market.
You don't have to be a lawyer to see an anti-trust complaint there, a rigging of the market engineered by a quasi-public authority. Welcome to Connecticut.
The written answers from Logistec, in which the company thanked the longshoremen's union for its 20-year partnership that it said helped grow the business in New London, were generally sanguine about the outcome of the RFP.
But the company did observe that they were excluded from the process.
"They were already in negotiations during the RFP process with Gateway Terminals," Vannelli wrote. "We were never given an opportunity to quote exclusively on wind by the (port authority,) so the RFP, from Logistec's perspective, was definitely flawed."
Someday we may even know why. This is the opinion of David Collins.

Glastonbury firm lands Killingly power plant contract
Matt Pilon
lastonbury-based Gemma Power Systems will quarterback engineering, procurement and construction work on a major power plant to be built in Killingly starting later this year.
Gemma, a subsidiary of Maryland’s Argan Inc., said Thursday that it won the contract from the plant’s developer, NTE Energy LLC. The value was not disclosed.
Approved by the Connecticut Siting Council last summer, the $700 million Killingly Energy Center will be a 650-megawatt dual-fuel (natural gas and diesel oil) combined cycle plant.
Gemma’s previous contracts from NTE have included new plants in Ohio and North Carolina.
“This will be the fourth project for the team of NTE, MHPS and Gemma and we are thrilled to have the opportunity to design and build another state-of-the-art energy project and to have it located in our home state of Connecticut,”G emma co-president Charles Collins, IV, said in a statement. “This project provides Gemma with another opportunity to use Connecticut labor which has successfully supported Gemma on past projects.”
In all, Gemma has worked on approximately 40 domestic power plant projects totaling 15 gigawatts.
The Killingly project would be the first major natural gas plant built in Connecticut since CPV Towantic was completed in 2018.
Environmental groups and clean-energy advocates have decried the Killingly plant, arguing that building more emissions-producing energy generation doesn’t mesh with Connecticut’s decarbonization goals over the coming decades.

Finish line for New Haven Harbor deepening project within sight
Mary E. O’Leary
NEW HAVEN — Under study since 2007, the deepening of New Haven Harbor is expected to get final approval by the U.S. Army Corps next month now that the state has agreed to bond its $25 million share of the major project’s cost.
The plan consists of deepening the main federal ship channel, maneuvering area, and turning basin to 40 feet from 35 feet and widening that channel and basin to allow larger deep-draft vessels to access the city’s port and the privately held terminals.
Ship pilots and terminal owners have testified that the current depths “do not meet the draft requirements of today’s fleet of bulk and tanker ships,” necessitating vessels to be light loaded before entering the harbor at increased costs and inefficiencies, according to the U.S. Army Corps final report signed by Lt. Gen. Todd Semonite, chief of engineers.
Locally, the harbor is overseen by the New Haven Port Authority, which was founded in 2003, with the harbor dredging project guided by recently retired authority Executive Director Judi Sheiffele, who is now a board member of the Connecticut Port Authority.
The cost is $72.311 million, with 75 percent of that picked up by the federal government.
Sheiffele said the plan has been consistently supported by the authority and the terminal operators over the course of the long environmental and feasibility studies because of what it will mean economically and in terms of safety for the shippers.
Once it is officially signed off by the Corps at the end of April, it goes to the Congress to be part of a 2020 bill. That is followed by a design phase with construction likely to start in October 2023. It will then take two more years to complete.
This is the city’s second go-around to get the necessary dredging done. A feasibility report was authorized in 1981 and approved in 1986. It was never built when the non-federal sponsor could not cover its share of the cost. That authorization expired in 2002.
The project calls for 4.28 million cubic yards of silt, mostly glacially deposited, to be removed from the channel and deposited in several open-water sites within the harbor and Long Island Sound. These include the Morris Cove borrow pit, the West River borrow pit and the Central Long Island Sound Disposal site.
Some of the ancillary benefits include creation of an oyster habitat site near the east breakwater, a rock reef habitat north of the west breakwater and a 58-acre salt marsh at Sandy Point in West Haven.
The material was not suitable for beach creation because it is too silty and would wash away, Sheiffele said.
The corps found that the New Haven port “is a crucial import location for refined petroleum products, which supplies demand within Connecticut and the broader Northeast region.” The majority of the landside acreage in the harbor also continues to be devoted to energy-related uses.
“This represents a long-term land use and economic asset for the economy of the state of Connecticut,” the corps wrote.
Petroleum product imports make up approximately 80 percent of the channel tonnage. Salt, sand, and cement imports are the dominant bulk cargoes and virtually all volumes are for immediate local use. Scrap metal is Connecticut’s largest single cargo by weight.
State Rep. Al Paolillo said the dredging and other improvements will “ensure the viability and competitiveness” of New Haven Harbor. “This will result in good paying jobs for residents throughout the Greater New Haven area,” he said.
State Senate Majority Leader Martin Looney said the money is part of a $90 million outlay over two fiscal years that will support capital improvements to the state’s deep-water ports. “These funds will go a long way toward ensuring our ports are best positioned to foster a diverse economy and robust economic development,” Looney said.
There are power and fiber optic cables located within much of the length of the harbor’s main shipping channel, which carry a capacity of 330 megawatts of high voltage direct current and internet and phone data transfer from New Haven to Shoreham, N.Y.
The Army Corps issued a permit to Cross Sound Cable for construction of the 25-mile power lines in 2002, approximately four miles of which is located within the federal channel. The corps required the cable be buried to a depth of at least 48 feet within the channel. After encountering ledge however, about 700 feet was not buried to the correct depth.
The company is required to do so now at a cost of $32 million as New Haven’s shipping channel is upgraded. The corps is attempting to resolve the issue informally, but will proceed with enforcement, if necessary, according to the report.
While the $32 million is not part of the $72.311 million, Sheiffele said U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., is leading the way among the congressional delegation as it seeks a waiver to remove the $32 million from the total cost as it will negatively impact the cost-benefit ratio. This waiver is also supported by the corps.
The final Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement, undertaken as part of Corps regulations can be read online. The formal name of the study is the New Haven Harbor Navigation Improvement Project Study.
There were several hearings on the findings in recent years. Those who want to comment further can write to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England District, 696 Virginia Road, Concord, Mass. 01742, by March 30.
 
Friction has been building for years inside the the state Department of Transportation between top administrators and unionized DOT engineers over the DOT’s increasing use of outside consultants, instead of in-house state-employed engineers, for highway and bridge construction projects.
Now it has burst into public confrontation, ignited by two sparks. One is a legislative proposal backed by the union for DOT engineers whose ranks have shrunk with state budget cuts. It’s House Bill 5261, the official purpose of which is to "require engineers employed by the Department of Transportation on a full-time basis to inspect highway and bridge construction projects.” The other igniting element is the distribution by the union (CSEA/SEIU Local 2001) of a flyer supporting H. B. 5261 that features side-by-side pictures: One shows the soon-to-be-renovated Arrigoni Bridge, between Middletown and Portland. The other shows the horrific scene of a pedestrian bridge that collapsed in 2018 at Florida International University in Miami, killing six.
What the two projects have in common, the flyer says, is the Florida-based FIGG Engineering Group.
FIGG Bridge Engineers designed the ill-fated Florida bridge, and has been saddled with major blame in the tragedy by the National Transportation Safety Board. And FIGG Bridge Inspection has been hired by the state DOT to provide “construction engineering and inspection (CEI) services” for a two-year, $46-million renovation of the landmark Arrigoni suspension span over the Connecticut River. “In Florida, they couldn’t handle the design of this,” the flyer says above the shot of the collapsed bridge. “So Connecticut put them in charge of this,” goes the printing above the Arrigoni Bridge picture. The flyer dramatized the union’s point.
“To generally advocate for more agency staffing is something we would expect and anticipate [from the union], but this flyer image portrays a false, fearmongering and utterly misleading representation to the public. It needs to be called for what it is — shameful, irresponsible, and just plain wrong,” DOT spokesman Kevin Nursick said Thursday.  According to Nursick, FIGG’s role on the local job is different than on the Florida project. Instead of doing design work, FIGG will provide CEI services including overall quality assurance such as verifying that the construction methods and materials conform with DOT specifications. FIGG’s CEI team for the Arrigoni Bridge renovations has performed well for years on various large bridge projects for the DOT, including the Q-bridge, the Route 2/I-84 Interchange and the Gold Star Memorial Bridge, Nursick said. “At the core of the department’s mission is an unwavering pursuit and focus — the safety of the public that we serve,” Nursick said. “This is at the heart of everything we do and is a principle we do not compromise, nor do we take lightly.” The union had raised the issue of FIGG’s role in the Florida collapse last year, when the DOT announced long in advance that FIGG had been selected for the Arrigoni job. But it wasn’t as forceful as it’s being this year, with the bill having been introduced in the legislature and the project now starting. No apologies are forthcoming from Travis Woodward — a DOT engineer who’s president of the local union of 2,500 state engineering, technical and scientific employees — for the aggressive approach. “As front-line employees we will always speak up for the safety of our members and the public," Woodward said. "Texas had a similar choice on their hands regarding FIGG and made the correct one,” in light of the NTSB’s findings about the Florida bridge collapse, by removing the company in January as “engineer of record” for the $800 million US 181 Harbor Bridge replacement project in Corpus Christi, Woodward said. However, a FIGG spokesperson said Thursday that the company is still heavily engaged in that Texas DOT project. Last October, the National Transportation Safety Board stated that “load and capacity calculation errors made by FIGG Bridge Engineers, Inc., are the probable cause of the fatal, March 15, 2018, Florida International University pedestrian bridge collapse in Miami.” "Contributing to the collapse was Louis Berger’s [another engineering company] inadequate peer review, which failed to detect FIGG’s calculation errors in its design of the main span truss member ... and connection to the bridge deck,” the NTSB said. It added that acts or omissions by others, including the university and the Florida transportation department, also “contributed to the severity of the collapse outcome.” FIGG defended itself a statement this week to The Courant saying, “The Miami Pedestrian Bridge construction accident occurred during a field operation. FIGG Bridge Engineers performed the design from their Tallahassee office and did not have a presence at the construction site." The statement said that “detailed research and analysis ... by preeminent forensic structural engineering experts Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates (WJE) determined that the pedestrian bridge construction accident resulted from a failure by contractors to comply with the final bridge design plans and State of Florida Standard Construction Specifications at the north end of the bridge. If the appropriate sections of the bridge had been properly fabricated, according to WJE, ‘the collapse would not have occurred.’”
 WJE was hired by FIGG to do the analysis, and WJE’s findings were considered by the NTSB before it issued its findings last October.  Woodward said the most important thing to note in the NTSB’s findings is that “a consulting company (Louis Berger) [was] overseeing another consultant (FIGG). As with all major incidents, everyone points the finger and no one accepts the blame. When public safety is involved, company profits [of consulting firms] should never be a consideration.” He testified Feb. 28 in support of H.B. 5261 at a public hearing held by the legislature’s transportation committee, saying front-line DOT workers “are dedicated professionals that put safety first and state employees consistently perform inspection work better, faster, and for less than outside consultants. By requiring that state employees perform the inspection work on transportation construction projects, we will not only be protecting lives, we will also be protecting Connecticut’s financial resources.”  He said “recent data provided by DOT indicate contracting out of Department services wastes between 56 and 63% in taxpayer dollars. Massive cost savings can be achieved if the work currently privatized by DOT is brought in-house. DOT’s latest reports indicate savings in the range of $100 million annually. In November of 2017, Tennessee reported they had saved over $54 million since 2012 by reducing their reliance on outside contractors and prioritizing hiring of State engineers. This is a success story we can easily replicate in Connecticut.” However, DOT Commissioner Joseph Giulietti submitted written testimony calling the bill “unnecessary” and saying that even though the department farms out inspection work to consultants, it’s still DOT staff engineers who give the final word that a construction project has been completed properly. Nursick has said in the past that DOT staff engineers “are ultimately responsible for overseeing the job and any consultants involved, as well as for final sign-off on the job,” adding that "consultants at all times are answerable to DOT staff.” “It goes without saying that there is a balance to be struck between maintaining in-house staffing levels and utilizing private sector consultants to perform various functions," Nursick has said. "We obviously seek to strike the best balance possible given the limited resources that we have to live within, and we always fully engage our own in-house staff before bringing on consultants.”
So, after everything that’s been said, what are the prospects of H.B. 5261?
Not good, said transportation Committee co-chair Roland Lemar, a Democratic state representative from New Haven. “I just don’t think there’s enough support" to vote the bill out of the committee, he said. Lemar said the DOT engineers have been pursuing the bill in recent years and “we wanted to give them a hearing” to investigate the relevant issues. He said he thinks “there is merit to their concern” about “private contractors reviewing each other’s work,” and he likes the idea of “a state entity that’s solely focused on public safety and welfare.” But “I certainly haven’t reached a decision” on how to resolve the issue, he said, adding that “I haven’t costed it out” to gauge the expense to taxpayers. “I think there is still work to do.”Woodward said he’ll keep trying next year. Meanwhile, the big Arrigoni Bridge renovation job officially began Feb. 27. So far it has involved work not visible to the public, but actual construction is expected to start in April, Nursick said. Traffic will be restricted for long periods to one lane in each direction, instead of the current two lanes each way. The renovations will be done on the long approach spans at the east and west that carry vehicles up to the 81-year-old bridge’s main suspension span in the middle, with its recognizable curved superstructure and vertical cables that rise above the road deck. The suspension bridge section was renovated years ago. Work on the approach spans will include replacing the road decks and upgrading and repairing the steel supports. Also, in a improvement that won’t improve the Arrigoni’s appearance, a new “protective fence system,” ranging from 8 to 12 high, will be installed across the whole bridge in reaction to jumping incidents. On the Middletown side, the St. John’s Square and Main Street intersection just off the bridge approach will be realigned “to improve safety and operational efficiency,” the DOT says. The DOT has awarded the $46-million construction job to Southington-based Mohawk Northeast, Inc. with a scheduled completion date of Feb. 25, 2022.

Hartford HealthCare to move 700 employees to downtown Hartford; 100 Pearl facelift on tap
Matt Pilon
Hartford HealthCare says it will relocate 400 employees and hire 300 more for its newly leased space in downtown Hartford’s 100 Pearl St. office tower, which is slated for renovations both inside and out.
The multimillion-dollar investment, detailed to Hartford Business Journal in an interview with Hartford HealthCare CEO Jeffrey Flaks, came together in just five months and creates major downtown visibility for the region’s largest health system, he said.
More importantly, the move aims to make Hartford HealthCare, parent to Hartford Hospital, a much bigger player in the center city as it tries to position itself as not just a care provider, but as a leading healthcare innovator and developer of new health technologies.
The new space will include a first-floor innovation center for use by Hartford HealthCare staff as well as new medical-technology startups.
Hartford HealthCare will be investing about $14 million in the project, but millions more will be spent on the property upgrade, which landlord Shelbourne Global will pay for.
HHC’s logo will be visible high atop the 18-story tower, and significant renovations, including installing clear glass on the first few floors of the building and expanding the footprint with a two-story glass cube at the corner of Pearl and Trumbull streets -- inspired by Apple’s Fifth Avenue office  in New York City -- will allow people walking or driving by to clearly see HHC’s media team in action in a new, upgraded TV studio, as well as innovation teams working with startups to develop new products and technologies.
“We have a vision to put people and feet on the street in Hartford,” Flaks said. “Health care is an economic driver and this particular project we’re putting forth is a really outstanding example of how we can use Hartford HealthCare to ultimately drive significant economic value for many sectors within our region.”
Renovations are expected to be complete and all 700 staff in place within 18 months, he said.
HBJ was first to report the lease in January.
There will be urgent-care telehealth booths for patients to interact virtually with HHC providers, lobby improvements and new equipment and renovations on multiple floors.
Flaks says there could be opportunities to lease more space in the future.
Officials had initially scheduled a major public announcement on Pearl Street this week, but the ongoing coronavirus outbreak forced HHC to cancel those plans. Numerous other gatherings and events in the area, from charity fundraisers to conventions, have been postponed or canceled over the past week.
Feet on the street
Starting in June, Hartford HealthCare plans to move non-clinical employees from the health system’s flagship Hartford Hospital, its Newington campus and eight other Connecticut locations to 100 Pearl.
Functions moving downtown include HHC’s chief investment officer, supply chain department, legal team, media and marketing staff, and others.
The 300 new hires are all slated to work in a planned “patient access center,” which is a central hub for scheduling patient appointments and procedures and ensuring HHC’s growing network of hospitals and outpatient facilities are utilized as efficiently as possible.
It’s a sort of patient-facing version of HHC’s care logistics center, a facility it opened in 2017 to better coordinate hospital-to-hospital patient transfers by ambulance and air.
HHC said the logistics center, currently housed in Newington, will also move to 100 Pearl.
While the logistics center handled nearly 9,000 cases per year, the patient access center is eventually expected to handle several million, Flaks said.
The first-floor innovation center is reflective of Hartford HealthCare's desire to dive more deeply into healthcare technology development. The health system helped launch a new healthcare startup accelerator and recently inked an agreement with the Israel Innovation Authority to bring Israeli technologies and companies  to Connecticut to develop and commercialize new products.
As HHC is Connecticut’s second largest employer, Flaks said it has a duty to its home city and region, and he is eager to talk about the economic impacts of the planned project.
First, there’s a marketing value to HHC in making its brand and presence more visible and prominent downtown.
Then there are real estate considerations.
“There are economies of scale here because we are centralizing services and there will be more efficiencies as we provide them in a more coordinated fashion,” Flaks said.
The functions that are moving downtown will also free up some space for higher-value clinical uses, he said.
Shelbourne Global Solutions acquired 100 Pearl in 2015 for $37 million. The building has been underleased of late, after its former marquee tenant Virtus opted for a move across the street to the Gold Building. The HHC deal stabilizes the building and provides for further improvements to the Class A space.
“We are thrilled to partner with Hartford HealthCare and whole-heartedly welcome them to 100 Pearl and to Shelbourne’s growing list of top-tier tenants,” Shelbourne Chief Operating Officer Michael Seidenfeld said in a statement. “HHC, a leader in providing quality healthcare throughout the state, shares our vision for Hartford’s future and will provide a vital amenity to city workers and residents. The decision by HHC to expand their headquarters to downtown Hartford is concrete and tangible evidence of the resurgence currently taking place in the commercial core of the city.”

Assembly leaders to meet on reboot plan for session
PAUL HUGHES
HARTFORD – General Assembly leaders are regrouping to figure out how to resume legislative business when the legislature reopens following a temporary coronavirus-related shutdown.
Democratic and Republican leaders are scheduled to confer together on March 23 on plans for proceeding after the two-week hiatus ordered Thursday because of the ongoing public health emergency ends on March 30.
It is possible that the bipartisan leadership decides at that time to extend the shutdown based on how the coronavirus is spreading in Connecticut
“I have no idea right now if this deadline is going to go past March 30. None of us do,” said House Minority Leader Themis Klarides, R-Derby.
“Right now, we are planning on March 30. If circumstances change, and it becomes unsafe to allow people in that building and do that business, then we don’t, but we will reassess on a daily basis,” she continued.
Meanwhile, Democratic and Republican leaders are going continue to consult one another daily through calls, emails and texts, as well as top officials of the administration of Gov. Ned Lamont and sometimes Lamont himself.
“There is a million different things that we have to figure out, but we can’t figure them out. Right now, everything is in an holding pattern,” Klarides said..
Advertisement
There is much unfinished legislative business, and it is it is unclear what will get done and what will have to wait now, including some legislation that otherwise likely would have passed in the 2020 session.
There will be roughly five weeks left in the legislative session if the legislature reopens as scheduled on March 30.
One of the thorny questions is deciding what bills get taken up, and how that legislation will be presented for House and Senate votes if the regular order of business has to be bypassed in a truncated session.
Generally, bills are reported out of the committees, and legislative rules require bills must have a hearing to be eligible for a committee vote.
Revised rules approved Wednesday on the last day the House and Senate met pushed back committee reporting deadlines after legislative leaders initially decided to close the state Capitol complex two days for disinfectant cleaning.
The new deadlines will pass for 17 out of 22 committees during the two-week shutdown that was ordered the following day..
The most likely option now will be to put legislation directly before the House and Senate through a procedure known as emergency certification, said House Speaker Joe Aresimowicz, D-Berlin, and Senate President Martin M. Looney, D-New Haven.
One of the unresolved questions is how Democratic and Republican leaders will select legislation that will become emergency certified bills. Under the rules, the House speaker and Senate president jointly make that call.
At this time, legislative leaders plan to do this on a bipartisan basis. Klarides said she has no reason to believe now that will not be the case.
If bills are fast-tracked, a related issue is how to give the public and interested parties an opportunity to testify on legislation that did not receive a hearing before the legislative session was paused.
Aresimowicz said one possibility is consolidating various bills that have been selected for emergency certification and conducting hearings on these combined measures.
Looney said how such hearings might be conducted is another question that will have to be decided, including whether to limit public comments to written testimony, or permitting in-person testimony.
PUBLIC ACCESS to the state Capitol and the Legislative Office Building is another fraught question to be decided.
Lamont issued an executive order that limited public gatherings to no more than 250 people, but his order does not apply to the legislative branch.
Aresimowicz said he remains averse to closing the Capitol complex to the general public.
“I’m very cautious, and I would only do that under extremely extraordinary conditions,” he said. “It is not something I would feel comfortable doing in the normal course of business.”
There is an easy option for buying more legislating time. The legislature is required constitutionally to adjourn on May 6, but a special session could be convened at 12:01 a.m. on May 7 for as long as deemed necessary.
“Obviously, we always have the right to do that,” Aresimowicz said.
The state budget is always the top agenda item. There is no rush to approve a budget bill because Lamont signed a two-year, $43.4 billion budget last year. The adopted $22 billion budget will be in place when the new fiscal year starts July 1.The legislature could meet before June 30 to make adjustments to the approved budget. This would not be unusual.