November 10, 2026

CT Construction Digest Tuesday November 10, 2026

Despite headwinds, Vineyard Wind, Revolution Wind come fully online

BROOKE KUSHWAHA/The New Bedford Light

Two of the country’s first large-scale offshore wind farms are now fully operational, the developers announced this week, promising to power a combined 750,000 homes in Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts.

Vineyard Wind became fully operational on Oct. 29, spokesperson Craig Gilvarg confirmed in an email to The Light Friday. On Thursday, another project, Revolution Wind, announced it had also come fully online after three years of construction.

Both projects finished installing their wind turbines earlier this year, Vineyard Wind in March and Revolution Wind in September. The new milestone means that all of the projects’ turbines are fully functional and capable of delivering power to the grid.

Both projects also faced considerable stops and starts from an adversarial federal government, including an attempt last month to pull permitting for Revolution Wind after the project had already been completed.

Green energy advocates celebrated the milestone, which they said would eliminate 1.6 million metric tons of carbon pollution annually — the equivalent of taking 325,000 cars off the road.

“A fully operational Vineyard Wind means New England families have another clean, affordable, local source of energy being delivered to their homes through the coming winter season,” Conservation Law Foundation Staff Attorney Anxhela Mile said in a statement Friday. “Federal and state leaders should be preparing to build out more of these projects to help lower energy costs and keep our air clean.” Vineyard Wind, a 62-turbine wind farm roughly 15 miles south of Martha’s Vineyard, delivers power to Massachusetts. Revolution Wind, a 65-turbine wind farm south of Block Island, delivers power to Rhode Island and Connecticut. The projects are key to the states’ clean-energy goals, given New England’s lack of open space for large-scale solar or onshore wind projects.

Although both projects just became fully operational, both have been delivering power to the grid for much longer, albeit at a reduced capacity.

Vineyard Wind produced 336,382 megawatt-hours between July and September of this year, according to recently released Federal Energy Regulatory Commission data. The Light’s analysis finds that’s enough to power approximately 193,300 Massachusetts homes. The project’s developer says it will power 400,000 homes once fully operational.

Revolution Wind is on a similar track. The project delivered 314,321 megawatt-hours between July and September of this year, roughly 22,000 megawatt-hours less than Vineyard Wind. The developer says it will power 350,000 homes once fully operational. Averages don’t tell the full story, however. Roger Williams University engineering professor Gordon Stewart cautioned that wind energy is cyclical and generally less predictable than other forms of energy. For example, power generation is generally expected to peak in the winter months when winds are stronger, and slump again in the summer. This pattern held true for Vineyard Wind, which produced approximately 410,400 megawatt-hours from October through December 2025 compared to 323,600 from April through June 2026.

But just because there is wind doesn’t mean that all the turbines are capturing it — and private companies tend to be secretive about engineering setbacks. Vineyard Wind, for example, took 7½ months to go fully online after completing construction, compared to 1½ months for Revolution Wind.

Vineyard Wind’s lawsuit against GE Vernova earlier this year seemed to blame the turbine supplier for the project’s struggles to reach full capacity. In May, Vineyard Wind said in court filings and hearings that the project was producing “less than half of its expected capacity,” and that 36 of the 62 turbines were not spinning. The lawsuit sought to prevent GE Vernova from exiting its contract to service and maintain the turbines before final commissioning work was complete. The parties settled in September after GE Vernova withdrew its notice of contract termination.

For this reason, next quarter’s data — as New England enters its windiest season — will be all the more revealing, Stewart said.

“It’ll be interesting to see if (the projects) are fully operational,” Stewart said. “And I think we’ll be able to see that.”

Capacity a key factor

Even when everything goes right, wind farms aren’t expected to operate at 100% efficiency — no energy project is. As Stewart calculated for a previous Light analysis of Vineyard Wind’s output data, the developer’s estimate that the project will power 400,000 homes roughly corresponds to a 50% capacity factor; in other words, the wind farm is only going to be 50% efficient on average.

Most offshore wind farms have a capacity factor between 40% and 50%. Onshore wind farms tend to have a lower capacity factor, because the turbines are smaller and wind is generally less powerful on land, Stewart said. Nuclear power plants, meanwhile, have a capacity factor of 90% or more, and coal plants average around 42%, according to federal data.

Vineyard Wind’s Gilvarg did not answer The Light’s question about how many turbines were operational as of Sept. 1. Federal data indicates that Vineyard Wind operated at closer to 25% capacity this past year as it worked to get up and running.

“My gut feeling looking at these numbers is that roughly half of their turbines were operating at any one time,” Stewart said.

A third completed wind project, South Fork Wind, 35 miles east of Long Island, offers a glimpse into Vineyard Wind and Revolution Wind’s potential future. The 12-turbine wind farm, completed in 2024, generated roughly one-third of the power that Vineyard Wind and Revolution Wind produced despite being one-fifth the size. That means South Fork Wind reached a capacity factor nearly double that of the two in-progress projects.


Walmart revives plans for new Waterbury store near Cheshire town line, I-84

Michael Puffer

Walmart is again pursuing plans to build a store on a nearly 20-acre site off Interstate 84 in Waterbury, on the city line with Cheshire.

A Nov. 6 filing in Waterbury’s land records confirms the retail giant’s renewed interest in the property at 3800 East Main St., which was previously considered for a Walmart supercenter and, later, an Amazon last-mile delivery center.

The filing, submitted by a limited liability company that owns the property, seeks an extension of traffic easement rights needed for the Walmart development. The LLC traces to Massachusetts-based real estate development and investment firm Shearwater Cos.

The filing states that Wal-Mart Stores East LP intends to enter into a ground lease for the site and identifies an access route to a new Walmart store.

The filing is the clearest confirmation yet of Walmart’s renewed interest in the property.

Waterbury Economic Development Director Joseph McGrath said he has been working with Walmart representatives for about two years on plans to develop the property.

“I’m thrilled to hear they are moving ahead,” McGrath said Monday, after being informed of the recent land records filing. “It will be grand list growth through new development of a vacant lot. It’s a win-win situation.”

A Walmart spokesperson, in an email response to an inquiry about the site, did not confirm or den

“We’re always looking for opportunities to expand and better serve communities,” reads the statement “We have no additional information to share at this time.”

Shearwater put the property up for sale in late 2023 with a $7 million asking price, under real estate services firm Colliers International.

Nicholas Morizio, Colliers president in Hartford and New Haven, said the property has been under contract for nearly a year, but remains on the market until a deal closes. He could not disclose the potential buyer.

The site has a history of attracting interest from major retailers and developers, although previous proposals have failed to advance.

In 2016, the Connecticut Department of Transportation approved a traffic permit for a mixed-use subdivision at 3800 East Main St. that included a proposed Walmart store.

The site was subsequently considered for an Amazon last-mile distribution center, but those plans also fell through.

Walmart currently operates a store and auto center on Wolcott Street in Waterbury, a busy commercial corridor near the Wolcott town line.

The proposed East Main Street location would give Walmart a presence along another major corridor, with this site benefitting from two nearby interchanges with Interstate 84.

Plans would tie the new Walmart location into an access road network of major retailers such as Costco, Kohl’s and Restaurant Depot.

Shearwater acquired the nearly 20-acre East Main Street property for $5 million in September 2022, citing its relative affordability compared with similar development sites in Massachusetts and a welcoming reception from Waterbury officials.

The property was once a steep, rocky hillside, but gravel excavation over the years reduced it to a relatively flat development site.

At the time of the acquisition, Shearwater partner Jamie Ciffolillo acknowledged that the property would still require substantial site improvements before construction could begin, including a significant retaining wall and utility connections.

Attempts to reach Shearwater for comment Monday was not immediately successful.


A major project on the Milford Parkway starts Monday. Here’s what to expect

Brianna Gurciullo

Periodic lane closures are expected on the Milford Parkway starting Monday, Nov. 9, as a major project gets underway to upgrade the highway that connects Route 15, Interstate 95 and Route 1.

“Motorists should be aware that closures and lane shifts will continue through November 2028 as the project moves forward,” said state Department of Transportation spokesperson Eva Zymaris.

The work includes paving the Milford Parkway, also known as the Daniel S. Wasson Connector, in both directions as well as “improving drainage, extending acceleration and deceleration lanes, revising lane configurations and pavement markings, upgrading roadside safety barriers (and) replacing overhead sign structures,” according to DOT.

The bridge that carries the highway over East Rutland Road in Milford will also be rehabilitated as part of the project.

The construction is expected to cost about $18 million, Zymaris said on Wednesday, with an 80% to 20% funding split between the federal government and the state. Terryville-based Richards Corp. was awarded the contract for the job.

In a public notice, DOT said the project will be completed in stages, with temporary barriers put in place to “maintain traffic flow and minimize disruptions to the traveling public.”

Work will take place during the day from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. Mondays to Fridays and at night from 7 p.m. to 5 a.m. Mondays to Thursdays.

The project aims to improve safety, reduce congestion and extend the service life of the parkway’s infrastructure, DOT said.

About 60,000 vehicles travel on the Milford Parkway each day, according to a public presentation DOT gave last year. From the beginning of 2021 to the end of 2023, there were 189 reported crashes in the project area, with 68% classified as rear-end crashes, the presentation said.


CT makes fuel cells that power data centers. Here’s what to know

John Moritz

Connecticut is playing a quiet role in powering the global build-out of data centers through the development of fuel cell power stations.

The global fuel cell market is expected to grow to around $30 billion in revenue by 2030, more than ten times the $2.8 billion in revenue reported last year, according to research firm Rystad Energy. Demand is largely coming from data centers, which require the kind of continuous, on-site power generation fuel cells provide.

While Connecticut has yet to experience widespread development of hyperscale data centers, it is home to two of the world’s leading manufacturers of fuel cells: Fuel Cell Energy in Danbury and Torrington and HyAxiom — a division of Doosan Group — located in South Windsor.

But what are fuel cells, and why are they suddenly of interest to data center developers?

How do fuel cells work?

Simply put, fuel cells create energy from a chemical reaction involving air and another fuel, usually hydrogen. The reaction produces water, electricity and heat.

From there, the process works similarly to a battery, with negative (anode) and a positive (cathode) ends surrounding an electrolyte layer. Hydrogen is delivered to the anode while air is sent to the cathode. Electrons travel through a circuit between the two ends, creating electricity.

Unlike a battery, fuel cells can operate around-the-clock without the need to recharge.

Fuels cells powered by natural gas must first break down methane into hydrogen and carbon dioxide, but they emit a lower volume of CO2 than traditional power plants that burn fossil fuels. (Fossil fuel-burning power plants also emit other air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and sulfur.)

For this reason, proponents tout fuel cells as an effective way to cut emissions while still providing essential power to homes, businesses, factories and, increasingly, data centers.

“That’s the biggest value piece of where fuel cells bring a real differentiator,” said Eric Strayer, the global head of sales at Fuel Cell Energy. “You don’t have a loud turbine combusting and, you know, vibrating at your site. It’s a quiet, electrochemical conversion of that natural gas into electricity and heat.”

Some critics, however, point out that fuel cells do rely on fossil fuels and related infrastructure, including natural gas pipelines.

How are they used?

The basic technology behind fuel cells has been around since the mid-1800s, a short time after the invention of batteries. A century later, Pratt and Whitney made hydrogen-oxygen fuel cells that were used to power the Service Module on NASA’s Apollo space missions.

Since the 1970s, the development of fuel cell technology has been driven by rising energy prices and the push for cleaner forms of electricity, according to the Los Alamos National Laboratory. In addition to providing electrical power, fuel cells can be used to power vehicles and heavy machinery.

Honda and Toyota both began selling hydrogen-fuel cell vehicles in the early 2000s. However, that technology has not become more widely available due to the high cost and limited availability of hydrogen refueling stations.

There are also different fuel cell designs based on the type of electrolyte used to produce the chemical reaction.

Fuel Cell Energy, for example, manufactures a molten-carbonate system with a minimum output of 1,250 kilowatts. Doosan, the parent company of HyAxiom, produces a 440-kilowatt solid-oxide fuel cell system.

What does the future hold?

Power fuel cells can be built small enough to fit on top of a tractor-trailer, allowing them to be transported and located nearly anywhere.

That’s made them attractive option for energy developers seeking to build in dense, urban communities or on former brownfield sites. Bridgeport, for example, is home to four different fuel cell power stations.

In addition, modular designs allow fuel cells to be scaled to provide much larger quantities of power — one of the principal demands of data centers.

For example, developers behind proposed data center projects in Beacon Falls, Colchester and Cromwell have all pitched using fuel cells to power those facilities instead of relying off the local power grid. So far, none of those projects have received approvals from state or local officials.

Elsewhere, the rush to construct and power new data centers is having local economic effects. At its manufacturing facility in Torrington, Fuel Cell Energy is currently hiring a around 100 workers as part of a ramp-up in production to meet the demand from data center developers. Just a few years ago, Strayer said, the plant’s production capacity was about 40 megawatts of fuel cells annually. The current ramp-up will increase production to 100 megawatts a year.

In addition, the company is investing more than $200 million to expand its manufacturing facility in hopes of producing up to 500 megawatts a year by mid-2028.

In October, South Windsor Town Manager Michael Maniscalco announced at a public meeting that HyAxiom was looking to “double in size” its facility within the town, adding about 200 jobs.