June 23, 2026

CT Construction Digest Tuesday June 23, 2026

Former Torrington Company site eyed for new public safety complex as owners propose sale

Sloan Brewster

TORRINGTON – The city of Torrington is considering building a public safety complex on the grounds of the former Torrington Company.

All but two buildings on the site were demolished between 2023 and 2024. The project was funded by a $2 million grant from the Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development Office of Brownfield Remediation and Development.

The final two buildings were slated for removal with a $600,000 brownfield remediation grant from the DECD, said Director of Economic Development William Wallach.

But Industrial Realty Group, the owners of the 70 North Street property, lost access to the grant as it requires a commitment to redevelop. The owners opted against redeveloping it and are planning to sell. 

IRG Marketing Director Lauren Crumrine did not respond to requests for comment.

When Wallach learned the property was going on the market, he realized it would be an ideal location for a public safety complex.

The city completed a feasibility study to determine what it would take to build a new public safety complex in April 2025, Wallach said. Per the study, the complex would require a 5- to 7-acre lot.

The North Street property has 9 acres, leaving room for recreational space, such as a park and amphitheater. While the former Torrington Company’s address is on North Street, it takes up property on adjoining streets, including North Elm.

The plan is still being developed but the proposal is for the complex to include a police department and a modified fire department, Wallach said.

The complex would also likely house emergency management and an Emergency Operations Center, said Chief of Police William Baldwin.

“The vision is absolutely wonderful,” Baldwin said. “Obviously it comes at a cost and we would have to determine what that cost would be.”

The police station, which is housed at 576 Main Street in a former school built in 1903, is in dire need of replacement, Baldwin said. The department was moved to the renovated school in 1990.

Before that, the station was in an outgrown and no longer functional space in city hall.

“Now we’re faced with the same thing,” Baldwin said. “(The building) doesn’t adequately support the mission of our department.”

The former school does not meet standards and lacks safety features present in modern facilities, he said. A modern facility would also help with recruitment and retention.

“It wasn’t designed to accommodate today’s staffing levels,” he said.

Baldwin said former Mayor Elinor C. Carbone started looking into the possibility of a new public safety complex and Mayor Molly Spino has taken on the quest.

He noted it would be ideal if the station was downtown and said officials also considered the former Nidec Corporation site at 100 Franklin Drive, the former Hendey Machine Company property on Summer and Litchfield Streets, which burned down last fall, and the Brunswick Mill on Migeon Avenue.

To modernize the police station would cost about $70 million while building a new complex would be approximately $90 million, Wallach said.  

The city is looking into funding for a second “deep dive” feasibility study through the Community Investment Fund, he said. The new study would delve into site selection, design components and public engagement.

Wallach is submitting an application for a Brownfield area-wide revitalization planning grant, he added.

Wallach said he has done some outreach to see if it’s feasible to build the complex on the former industrial site, including hosting a block party in the municipal parking lot at the corner of Main Street and North Elm Street.  

Spino, members of the Economic Development Commission, Board of Public Safety, police and fire departments, business owners and residents attended.

During the party, Wallach announced the idea to put the public safety complex on the North Street property and showed renderings of the plan, he said. 

Wallach noted that residents are attached to the property as most know someone who worked there when it was the Torrington Company.

“Now we as a city have an opportunity to reclaim that property," he said. "It would be a pathway for us to own that historic piece of land and own it forever.”

Wallach said city officials have had discussions with IRG about obtaining the property but have not discussed numbers yet.

Assuming the city were able to obtain the property this summer, it would take down the last two buildings in late fall and begin the approximately 18-month remediation project next spring, along with planning the infrastructure and funding.

Wallach said he is hopeful the city can use the $600,000 from the DECD for the demolition and clean up.

“That puts us at like 24 months before we could do any type of groundbreaking,” he said. 


Complaints are that solar projects consume 8% of its land. So CT town sues to block a new one

Don Stacom 

Claiming that the state Siting Council abused its power and ignored environmental concerns, East Windsor is suing to block a 150-acre expansion of the massive Gravel Pit solar field in the southeastern part of town.

East Windsor is asking a New Britain Superior Court judge to overturn the Siting Council’s unanimous approval of the hugely controversial Gravel Pit solar expansion.

The lawsuit largely repeats the arguments that the town and East Windsor Residents for Responsible Solar previously made to the siting council: The project is an environmental risk as well as a serious blow to northern Connecticut agriculture.

In addition, the suit contends that East Windsor and its residents already shoulder an unfairly large share of the state’s solar projects and shouldn’t be asked to take on more.

The lawsuit lists 18 nearby residential property owners who oppose the expansion, and says the council’s deliberations didn’t give adequate weight to those concerns.

This month, though, Gravel Pit Solar’s corporate owners won intervenor status in the case. Judge Matthew Budzik granted their request, giving them status to directly challenge the town’s assertions about their project.

“Approximately 18.6% of all solar projects approved by the council are located in the town,” East Windsor argues in the lawsuit. “Approximately 31.7% of all solar projects approved by the council that are now operational are located in the town.”

DESRI — D.E. Shaw Renewable Investments — got permission to build the original Gravel Pit Solar project five years ago. It’s a 120-megawatt facility on woodlands and former farmland, and advocates say it’s an important part of maintaining power to southern New England’s grid.

Last year, the company applied for permission for a 30-megawatt expansion. During the course of extended Siting Council review and hearings, the town and the local legislative delegation wrote letters in opposition. Sen. Saud Anwar warned that approval would lead to clearing of 46 acres of trees, and reduce availability of future farmland as well as natural habitats.

State Rep. Jaime Foster and Rep. Carol Hall also complained to the council, citing noise concerns, potential for lost tax revenue and the imbalance of solar facility locations in Connecticut.

But the council noted that the roughly 500 acres eyed for expansion are near gravel mining operations, the main Gravel Pit Solar facility, a landfill and a tobacco barn. In addition, the company would develop only about 150 of those acres.

The lawsuit contends that far too much East Windsor land is already used for solar facilities. Including the new expansion, the town hosts projects on nearly 1,400 acres and yielding more than 160 megawatts. In all, solar facilities now account for more than 8% of the town’s total land area, according to the suit.

“Connecticut only has approximately 170,000 acres of open farmland, about 5% of the state, with the amount of soil designated as the most productive approximately half of that total,” the lawsuit contends.

“The Connecticut Valley is one of the most threatened agricultural regions in the Northeast. The development pressure threatening the agricultural land in Connecticut Valley, as well as the town, includes the development of solar projects.”

But the council determined that the wider public benefit of expanded solar capacity is significant enough to justify the project.

“The proposed facility expansion is intended to achieve additional renewable generation capacity efficiently and cost-effectively while minimizing environmental and construction impacts and avoiding further modifications to the transmission system,” according to the council’s findings.


Plans for hundreds of apartments in CT downtown take big step forward. ‘As optimistic as ever.’

Kenneth R. Gosselin

The developer of the apartments around the city’s minor league ballpark is moving ahead with the next phase of nearly 300 units, a nearly $72 million project that could be completed in early 2028 with financing that is now falling into place.

The 286-unit project would complete the second half of “The Portrait” apartments, the largest component yet in the North Crossing development and across Main Street from Dunkin’ Park in downtown Hartford.

Construction is expected to get started in the next couple weeks and comes as leasing in the 237 apartments in the first half has demonstrated early strong tenant demand. Leasing launched in early May and 34 units are expected to be occupied in the first weeks of July, according to the developer, RMS Cos. of Stamford.

A ribbon-cutting is scheduled for Thursday.

Office conversions and new construction such as North Crossing have added more than 3,000 units since 2013 in the downtown area.

But RMS founder and chief executive Randy Salvatore said the demand he has seen so far  at “The Portrait” plus his two other apartment projects downtown shows him that more residential rentals can be absorbed into the market.

One of those is the the 270-unit “The Pennant,” the first phase of North Crossing that opened in 2022, that now has a 98% occupancy, Salvatore said.

“I’m very optimistic — as optimistic as ever,” Salvatore said.

The Capital Region Development Authority, the quasi-public agency, recently approved an $18 million, low-cost, state taxpayer-backed loan for the second half of “The Portrait.” The loan still needs approval of the State Bond Commission, but Salvatore said he can push ahead now.

The financing for the second half of “The Portrait” already includes $17.6 million in developer equity and $36 million in a bank loan.

Together, the two phases of “The Portrait” will encompass nearly 525 apartments with a shared parking garage of 535 spaces, built in the first half.

The second phase will be 50 “junior” one-bedrooms, 144 one-bedrooms and 82 two-bedrooms. The apartments will average 774 square feet with an average monthly rent of $2,115, not including parking. In the first phase of “The Portrait” there is a $100 monthly fee to lease a parking space in the garage and a $50 monthly amenity fee.

The first phase of “The Portrait” has a full range of amenities: a pool in the center courtyard, plus a fitness center and lounge on street level with windows facing Main Street and Dunkin’ Park. The rooftop deck with its lounge and picnic area overlooks the ballpark and will offer community garden space for residents.

“We’re excited to see this next phase move forward,” David S. Steuber, CRDA’s executive director, said. “It will complete the block across from the Yard Goats stadium.”

CRDA also approved an $11.8 million loan for “The Pennant” and a $13.6 million loan for the first half of “The Portrait.” CDRA said RMS remains in good standing with its current CRDA loans.

North Crossing also includes the area east of Dunkin’ Park where the city is now dismantling the former data processing center at 150 Windsor St.. beginning first with interior spaces. Once the property is cleared, the city hopes to build a center for artificial intelligence research. Salvatore plans to construct a $30 million, 120-room boutique hotel and a 200-space parking garage as a companion development on the same site.