July 8, 2026

CT Construction Digest Wednesday July 8, 2026

Crystal Mall conversion has new timetable for Electric Boat workers arrival

Luther Turmelle

The conversion of the former Crystal Mall in Waterford into a satellite corporate campus for General Dynamics Electric Boat is underway and company officials say that some some workers could begin moving into the former retail center as soon as the end of September this year,

Construction of some portions of the mall that will be used as training space is ongoing, according to a company spokesman. But Scott Ritter of Electric Boat said the conversion of the mall into office space is being done in phases, with the renovation of the former mall's first empty anchor store space, which housed Macy's, to begin in the fourth quarter of this year.

It wasn't clear on Thursday how many Electric Boat employees will be making the initial move into the renovated former mall space this September. The renovated mall space won't be fully occupied until the middle of next year, when between 4,000 and 5,000 workers will begin working there.

Electric Boat bought the mall in phases last year, completing the purchase in October 2025. The mall's last tenants moved out this spring.

Crystal Mall had nearly 783,000 square feet of space spread over two floors when it was operating and that will give Electric Boat plenty of space to work with. Much of the work being done now is what Electric Boat refers to as "occupancy programing," which Ritter described as "figuring out what functions are going where and how the available space can be best used.'

When the renovation of the former mall is completed, it will provide space for Electric Boat to expand its engineering, training and software development on one site to support the Columbia- and Virginia-class submarine production. Moving those function from Electric Boat's Groton corporate campus will allow more space for manufacturing functions.


Waterbury plans to remove Risdon Dam to spur redevelopment of former factory site

Michael Walsh

WATERBURY — The city plans to remove a dam that officials said should benefit the redevelopment of a South Main Street property.

Waterbury was awarded a $339,000 grant from the state’s Department of Energy and Environmental Protection to support the project.

Jim Nardozzi, the executive director of the Waterbury Development Corporation, said the removal of the Risdon Dam “will contribute to the economic redevelopment of the property” at 2100 South Main St., which is the former site of Risdon Manufacturing.

“(Waterbury Development Corporation) supports the removal of the dam and thus were happy to learn of the recent grant award for the study and planning of the dam’s eventual removal,” Nardozzi said.

The city said the funding will be used for the “environmental investigation, engineering design and permitting” needed to remove the dam. That process could take a year to unfold before the city contracts a construction company to remove the dam.

“This grant represents another important investment in Waterbury’s infrastructure and environmental stewardship,” Mayor Paul K. Pernerewski Jr. said in a statement. “Removing the Risdon Dam will improve the health of Hopeville Pond Brook, reduce flood risks, and help restore a more resilient ecosystem for future generations. We appreciate DEEP’s partnership and support in helping us move this important project forward.”

Hopeville Pond Brook is a tributary of the Naugatuck River and within the Long Island Sound watershed, according to the mayor’s office. The city said the project would “improve aquatic habitat, reconnect stream corridors, reduce flood risk, and eliminate a deteriorating structure that poses potential safety concerns for nearby properties and infrastructure.”


Explosions planned at Bridgeport's Remington Woods. Here's why.

Brian Lockhart

BRIDGEPORT — If you live near or happen to be passing by the former Remington Woods ammunition testing grounds this month and mild explosions again ring out, do not be alarmed — it is supposed to be the sound of progress.

Mayor Joe Ganim’s administration has warned residents of possible “open destruction of munitions and explosives of concern” within the fenced-in 400-plus-acre urban forest, between July 6 and July 31. 

“The Bridgeport fire, police and health departments have been made aware of these plans and encourage all residents living near … to remain calm during periods of loud noises in the area,” concludes the announcement issued last week.

But why exactly is it happening?

Owner Sporting Goods Properties is making certain there are no dangerous remnants from the site’s old days as a playground for the military industrial complex as efforts proceed to transform the long-dormant property and its Lake Success into a clean energy park with a public nature preserve.

“Sporting Goods Properties is conducting additional scanning work in several areas to ensure that no munitions remain on site,” Thomas Stilley, who has been helping to oversee the property remediation at Remington Woods, responded when asked to expand upon the city’s warning. “The scanning will cover several work areas that were used during the lake remediation project for processing sediment and separating munitions.” 

Basically this clean-up has been done before but for obvious reasons the company wants to guarantee nothing dangerous was missed.

“This is a quality assurance check to make sure all munitions were recovered and safely disposed,” Stilley said, adding that the public notice was needed so if any materials are discovered, “trained technicians would be able to proceed directly to planning and safely executing the controlled detonation of any munitions without incident or delay.” 

But because that will not be done near the boundary, “most people won’t hear it at all,” Stilley specified. “If it does need to happen, people could hear a sound like a firecracker or a car engine backfiring.”

The future of the property has been a source of speculation for decades given it is prime green space in Connecticut’s largest urban center. So far, other than the occasional tour organized by the owners, that lush forest has also remained tantalizingly off limits to the public given the potential hazards there from when it was a testing ground.

As the slow remediation, overseen by federal and state environmental authorities, has progressed, reuse plans have been formed. In 2021, Bridgeport officials approved a new land use policy allowing eventual construction of an office park while saving open space.

Sporting Goods, however, last fall pivoted and been focusing on establishing an energy park with a solar generation and battery project that can help finance converting about 365 acres into a preserve for hiking and bird-watching.

Last month it was announced that United Illuminating had awarded the solar component a competitive contract.

But do not start lacing up those hiking boots quite yet. According to Stilley, there is still plenty of remediation to be done over the next roughly six months to a year: “Some small excavation projects, installation of a protective cap, wetland restoration plantings, along with continued groundwater monitoring and testing.”

“The timeline for the clean energy and open space plan is still to be determined because the schedule depends on the approval process and construction cycles for the solar and battery storage projects,” he said, noting the former could start in 2027.


Killingly wetlands commission rejects Amazon distribution center plan

Gianni Salisbury Alison Cross

Killingly — A controversial proposal to build a 1.3 million-square-foot Amazon distribution center on Westcott Road was voted down by the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission on Monday.

In a 3-2 decision, the commission denied a permit for the development, which has been opposed by neighbors and community groups for months.

The commission denied the application without prejudice, which means the developer can make changes and resubmit it. The denial can also be appealed to Superior Court.

Commission member Corina Torrey made a motion to reject the application because it would cause "irreversible and irretrievable loss of wetlands or watercourse recourses," by impacting 23,056 square feet of wetlands. The motion also stated that Amazon has not met state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection standards and did not demonstrate that there was no feasible alternative that would cause less environmental impact to the wetlands.

The commission debated whether the project should be denied with or without prejudice based on the fact the application was incomplete. Ultimately, members decided to deny it without prejudice.

The Amazon development, also known as “Project Husky,” is currently undergoing a site plan review by the town Planning and Zoning Commission.

In past meetings, Town Attorney Kenneth Slater has explained that site plan reviews leave zoning commissioners with little to no discretion when deciding whether to approve a permit. Slater has said that the commission is obligated under state law to approve the application if it complies with all regulations.

Wetlands commission approval is required before the zoning commission can make a decision to approve the project.

Before Monday night’s vote, former town councilwoman Michelle Murphy of the Keep Killingly Rural coalition had said her group intended to appeal the wetlands decision in the event that the commission approved it. Murphy had said a GoFundMe started by the group had already raised enough money to cover the legal costs.

Murphy said Tuesday that no matter what changes are made to the plan, the group will still be opposed to it.

"Our next step is based on what they do. If they appeal we will go one direction and if they resubmit we will go a different direction. … It's too big. We don't want it to happen at all," Murphy said.

She said she also disagreed with the finding of "no prejudice" and that the application was incomplete.

"It is the applicant's job to provide proof that there was no feasible and prudent alternative to the project that exists that would cause less damage to the wetlands. That is the law of the land. The motion and points presented by Corina (Torrey) was enough, in themselves, and legitimate enough to veto the project," Murphy said.

In town meetings, residents have repeatedly raised concerns that the construction and operation of the warehouse would destroy ecosystems, pollute the groundwater that feeds local wells, decrease property values, and create new traffic, light and sound nuisances, among other concerns.

The proposed 24/7 Amazon fulfillment center would employ 500 workers, bring in more than 400 trucks a day, and serve as the company’s “most advanced robotics facility” in the state, according to Amazon Economic Development Director Brad Griggs.

The fulfillment center and additional tractor trailer loading docks, parking lots and driveways would be built on roughly 264 acres of undeveloped, wooded land at 228 Westcott Road. The project would also set aside nearly 300 acres of land surrounding the project for conservation.