February 26, 2021

CT Construction Digest Friday February 26, 2021

O&G Industries Leads $54.6M I-84 Safety, Operational Improvement Job
















IRWIN RAPOPORT The Connecticut Department of Transportation's (CTDOT) $54.6 million I-84 Safety and Operational Improvements project in West Hartford, awarded to O&G Industries Inc., is based upon the mitigation of traffic congestion and safety concerns that can arise in heavy traffic situations.

This two-stage project, financed by the state and designed by BL Companies, started in March 2020 and should be completed in summer 2023. Additional parties involved in the project include Urban Engineers Inc., hired as the construction engineering and inspection consultant.

The project runs west and east along I-84. From the west, it begins at the Farmington/West Hartford town line and ends at the Park Road on-ramp and from the east and 500 ft. east of the Ridgewood Road overpass and extends 200 ft. east of the Mayflower overpass.

Ghazi Alsaqri, CTDOT's project engineer, addressed the initiative's benefits and positive impacts.

"The existing traffic volume within the project limits is at or near capacity, and combined with closely spaced interchanges, results in congestion and weaving concerns on this section," he said. "A review of the three-year crash data between 2012 and 2014 revealed a total of 159 crashes with 48 injuries and one fatality on I-84 WB, and a total of 202 crashes with 90 injuries and one fatality on I-84 EB. The crashes seen most prominently in this time period — rear endings, sideswiping, fixed-object crashes — are indicative of issues related to congestion and vehicle weaving maneuvers.

"The region has grown and with that, the foundations built previously are no longer feasible for the increased volume," he added. "I-84 was constructed in the early 1960s to support regional mobility and commerce; and as the region has grown over the past 60 years, so has daily traffic. Upon its completion, the sections being improved will achieve project goals of increased commuter safety, local and regional commerce and freight mobility."

An additional lane is being added on I-84 WB between Exits 39A and 43, which extends 9,500 ft. Additionally, for the I-84 EB direction, a lane will be added between Exit 40 and 41, which extends 2,800 ft. The lane additions in both directions are feasible via the replacement of the Berkshire Road bridges to accommodate them.

The work also covers replacing the superstructure and widening the Ridgewood Road Bridge on I-84 WB; removing the concrete haunches on the underside of Bridge No. 1747 carrying South Main Street over I-84; installing a noise barrier wall at Bridge No. 1746 carrying I-84 over Rockledge Brook; removing and reconstructing noise barrier walls; and installing an incident management system/information technology system and highway drainage improvements.

Due to regional and population growth, the standards and guidelines for projects of this nature also have changed.

"To ensure that all required standards are met, several elements related to the existing highway cross section, including shoulder widths, will be part of the safety improvements," said Alsaqri. "Guidelines and adherence to standards are being brought up-to-date with the mill and overlay of the existing travel lanes, installation of guiderail to current standards and concrete barrier curb where warranted, relocation of overhead and side mounted sign structures, minor relocation of highway luminaires and the replacement of existing noise barrier walls in poor condition and installation of new ones where warranted."

The construction plan is based on design and engineering issues.

"Construction staging of the bridge replacements is challenging but made possible through temporary closure or realignment of I-84 EB and WB Exit 40 on-ramps," said Alsaqri. "The Ridgewood Road Bridge for I-84 WB is a two-span steel girder bridge and both Berkshire Road bridges are single-span steel girder bridges. The new structures at Berkshire Road are innovative Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil-Integrated Bridge Systems [GRS-IBS], which are typically less expensive and faster to build, and the reinforced approach roadway alleviates the bump at the bridge typically caused by differential settlement."

The noise barrier walls will be constructed during Stage 2, when traffic is shifted to the inside of the highway, to meet current engineering standards and reduce roadway noise for adjacent residents and businesses.

"During the planning and design phase, the department conducted a noise study in accordance with Federal Highway Administration requirements for this type of project," said Alsaqri.

CTDOT is keeping people informed about traffic and construction updates through social media platforms and public meetings.

"Construction activities are being performed during periods of lighter traffic volumes and three lanes will be maintained in each direction during all heavy traffic periods," according to CTDOT. "In order to reduce the impact [of] lane closures, certain activities will be required to take place at night. Construction activities can occur at any time. However, the allowable lane closure periods are restricted to minimize impacts to the travelling public."

Stage 1A of the project, which was just completed, dealt with the first half of the I-84 WB bridge at Ridgewood and median reconstruction at the western limits of the project, and Stage 1B, which should be finished in April 2022, covers portions of the new Berkshire Road Bridges, median widening, cross slope correction, and retaining walls.

Stage 2A, from April to October 2022, will focus on the second half of the I-84 WB bridge over Ridgewood Road, outside shoulder reconstruction, noise barrier walls, and the remaining portions of the Berkshire Road bridges, while Stage 2B — November 2022 to May 2023, focuses on implementing the final traffic patterns and removing temporary pavement used during staging of the project.

"Every job has different challenges," said John Rouleau, O&G's project manager. "CTDOT is in the midst of re-profiling its roadways — not just taking roadways and overlaying them, but putting in new cross slope and profile changes. One of the first operations on this project was laser scanning the entire roadway, then overlaying that data onto the new proposed cross sections. With this information, we were able to compute the cut and fills to the proposed roadway riding surface. Next, we milled the existing roadway to remove the deteriorated asphalt, fills were laid out and multiple lifts of bituminous concrete were placed to bring the roadway to its proposed new grade.

"This presented an early challenge because the paving needed to occur prior to work starting on the first milestone operation, which was the Ridgewood Road Bridge that had a Stage 1A completion date of October 2020," he added.

"We had to complete this wedge paving, which required a great deal of finesse and was time consuming. We started on the demolition of the Ridgewood Road Bridge in June and completed the Stage 1A portion of the bridge work on schedule, which was critical to CTDOT and us.

"Relations with CTDOT and their designers are one of the best I have encountered in my 35-year career. There are always issues, but they have been proactive in working with us. If we had any submittals that were red lining, they put their utmost attention to turn it around as soon as possible."

Another key operation involves the placement of the Information Management System (IMS). This includes the installation of cameras, message boards and underground fiber optic cable in ducts. This had to be completed prior to the start of the bridge reconstruction on Ridgewood Road and Berkshire Road.

"We are presently in discussions of how to expedite the IMS scope to enhance the schedule," said Rouleau, who noted that there have been no major issues from a utility standpoint. "CTDOT coordinated all of the utility work needed to make sure the Stage 1 work on the Berkshire Road Bridge was completed on time."

The initial night work wrapped up in early December.

"These operations revolved around the re-profiling of the road," said Rouleau. "We will be working through the 2020-2021 winter. There will be times when we slow down certain operations. We won't be doing any paving, but there will be some concrete work, setting precast barriers, bridge demolition, abutment construction, drainage installation and earth work that will continue.

"Right now, we're working in the median section — egress is a challenge and we have been using the ends of the job and Berkshire Road as ways of entering and exiting," he added. "As we build the bridges on Berkshire Road, access to the median will soon be closed off so all egress will be at the east end of the job. This will allow us to work safely and effectively during the day. It's tight, but doable."

O&G crews are now in Stage 1B.

"The roadway is being widened and we're placing 10 inches of processed aggregate base on a compacted subgrade, then topping it with 15 inches of asphalt," said Rouleau. "This asphalt is comprised of several layers of polymer modified asphalt [PMA]. The road work has started in the median. We did all of the Stage 1A road work and quite a bit of the median on the western limits of the project. Presently, we're working on Berkshire Road Bridge toward the eastern limits of the project. Our goal is to get everything graded so that in April or May, we can start paving right away."

Currently, the day and night shifts have been between 50 and 70 craft personnel, including the laborers, carpenters, ironworkers, Operating Engineers, Teamsters, electricians and masons.

The Ridgewood Road Bridge (1743) is 150 ft. long and has two spans and the Berkshire bridges (1744 and 1745), approximately 90 ft. long, are being converted to single span bridges.

"They will be built on Geo-Synthetic Reinforced Soil [GRS] abutments, and each of the bridges are being done in two phases," said Rouleau. "They will be worked on simultaneously. We wrapped up the demolition of the median sections for bridges 1744 and 1745. For bridge 1743, we're modifying the abutments, the piers and putting in architectural in-fills below it."

A shear mounted on a Caterpillar 345 backhoe is helping with the demolition activities.

"We're using GPS equipment to assist grading and drainage operations, and have GPS systems mounted to our dozers and backhoes," said Rouleau.

The asphalt removed by milling operations is immediately placed in trucks and brought to a plant where it is recycled to create RAP. The concrete from the bridges is taken to recycling plants where it is crushed and turned into subbase.

"We're recycling quite a bit of the material," said Rouleau.

Nearly 5,000 ft. of new noise barrier wall shall be installed in Phase 2, toward the end of 2021 and into 2022.

"It is anticipated it will reduce highway noise by about 20 decibels," said Rouleau. "We're replacing dilapidated walls with columns augured into the ground, stabilized with concrete,and sound absorption panels with an ashlar stone to finish it."

Rouleau has a solid management team and seasoned crews.

"Our team is a quality group, most with over 20 years of roadway and bridge building under their wing," he said. "CTDOT and Urban Engineers also have a strong team. Urban Engineer's Josh Gray is an excellent resident engineer — he's very thorough and a pleasure to work with. You need a good team pulling in the same direction and sharing a common goal to build a quality successful project. I've also been very satisfied with the people that the unions sent to us.'

The main subcontractors are Langan Connecticut Inc. for road scanning; CCA LLC. for surveying; Tilcon Connecticut Inc. for milling and paving; AFC Construction LLC. for the concrete work on the bridge structures; A.M. Rizzo Electrical Contractors Inc. for electrical, light, signal and IMS work; Alma Iron LLC. for furnishing and installing rebar for the bridges; Quaker Corporation for the overhead and side-mounted signs; Haven Steel Erectors Inc. for the bridge steel; Supreme Industries Inc. for the clearing and grubbing; Total Fence LLC. for the metal beam rail and protective fencing; and Safety Marking Inc. for the pavement markings.

Bridge demolition, along with other activities, should generate 3,500 cu. yds. of concrete removal; 10,000 tons of bituminous concrete removal; 900 tons of structural steel removal; and 56,900 cu. yds. of earth and rock excavation.

New construction materials should include: 4,000 cu. yds. of concrete; 68,500 tons of bituminous concrete; 800 tons of new structural steel; 80 new drainage structures and 6,600 linear ft. of drainage pipe.

Additional equipment on site and to be brought in later includes: a Grove RT880E rough-terrain crane; Caterpillar backhoes — an M322F, a 335F, two M330s and a 345 backhoe with a LaBounty UP 45 processor; two Caterpillar D6 dozers; a JLG 60-ft. manlift; an Ingersoll-Rand SD116DX earth roller; a Caterpillar 966E loader; a Sterling LT9513 tri-axle dump truck; and a Kenworth T800B truck.

"We have an onsite mechanic to take care of issues that can be handled here," said Rouleau. "If it's something major, it's removed from site and replaced. We maintain the equipment daily — proper grease and oil changes, hose condition checks are conducted by both the operators and the mechanics. The operators check the fluid levels prior to starting the equipment each start of shift and the equipment must be cleaned at the end of each shift. It's attention to detail, upkeep and daily maintenance that allows our operations to stay efficient." CEG


Charter Oak Bridge Project Set to Bring Congestion Relief for Connecticut's Capitol Region

IRWIN RAPOPORT  The delivery of the Connecticut Department of Transportation's (CTDOT) I-91 Charter Oak Bridge (COB) Project, a large-scale initiative that combines two projects to reduce congestion and improve safety in the city of Hartford, and towns of East Hartford, and Wethersfield, is less than two years away.

The contract, administered by CTDOT, District 1 and the Federal Highway Administration, was awarded to O&G Industries/Barletta Heavy Division, Joint Venture (OGBHD), at a cost of approximately $213 million. The project, which began April 1, 2019, involves multiple stages and an aggressive schedule with incentives for the contractor to not only finish on time, but ahead of schedule wherever possible.

The anticipated completion date is May 26, 2022. Project Consultant Inspection is being done by WSP, and the infrastructure was designed by CME Associates (CME) and HW Lochner (HWL).

The purpose of the project is to strategically target and alleviate recurring traffic congestion along I-91 northbound by constructing a new, two-lane exit-ramp to the COB (Route 5/15) at Exit 29 (Bridge 6947) in place of the existing, single-lane ramp configuration. It will replace — doubling the capacity and improving the geometry — the current operationally deficient ramp, well-known for creating traffic tie-ups on northbound I-91 and on the COB.

Congestion results in daily delays and safety concerns for motorists as traffic slows or stops on the highway. The project will relieve this bottleneck for roughly 80,000 drivers per-day by improving through-traffic capacity and reducing weaving maneuvers on I-91 northbound and on Route 5/15 northbound on the COB.

"This addresses safety concerns associated with congestion and operational shortcomings in Hartford and East Hartford at I-91NB Exit 29," said CTDOT Project Engineer Juan Ruiz. "Congestion, with queueing in the right lane of I-91 NB, has been observed to extend as far as approximately 1.4 miles. This is due the steep vertical grade of the existing Exit 29, with a significant volume of heavy vehicles and traffic volumes that are near capacity. In addition, the lane-drop from four, to three lanes, at Exit 27 contributes to this congestion; the northbound portion of the Charter Oak Bridge has experienced heavy weaving of vehicles entering from the I-91 Exit 29 with vehicles on Route 5/15."

Crews are relocating the future I-91 northbound Exit 29 and constructing the new ramp such that two lanes will exit I-91 northbound from the left, fly over Route 5/15 southbound, and enter the COB from the left lanes.

"The I-91 NB Exit 29 is being redesigned to be a major diverge, with two dedicated lanes for the left exit ramp to Route 5/15 NB," said Ruiz. "The new ramp will have added capacity and improved grades so that trucks can maneuver easier, and these changes will improve traffic flow and reduce recurring congestion."

Work is being done in four stages: Stage 1 — lower roadways under bridges; Stage 2 — widen portions of I-91 northbound and Route 5/15 northbound; Stage 3 — construct a new Exit 29 ramp, and Stage 4 — remove the existing Exit 29 ramp. The overall project entails:

Widening of northbound I-91 from Exit 27 to Exit 29 for approximately 5,700 ft. to allow for the installation of an additional travel lane. This requires the widening of the bridges over Route 15, the Airport Road on-ramp, and Airport Road, as well as the lowering of the roads below all three bridges to allow for adequate overhead clearances.

Construction of a new two-lane exit ramp from northbound I-91 to the COB, including: construction of one new bridge; widening the portion of the northbound COB over I-91 to accommodate four northbound travel lanes, and eventually, the removal of the existing single-lane ramp from I-91 northbound to the COB.

Installation of new lane markings on the new Exit 29 on-ramp and on the COB to accommodate four travel lanes (two lanes from the new on-ramp and two from Route 5/15).

Widening of northbound Route 15 to add an additional lane from the COB to the Silver Lane underpass in East Hartford, as well as the widening of the bridges over Main Street and Silver Lane.

Improvements to extend the service life of the pavement and bridges (milling, paving and subsurface concrete repairs) on I-91 north and south between the Elm Street overpass in Wethersfield and the new Exit 29 off-ramp in Hartford, drainage system upgrades, and guiderail upgrades to meet current standards

"Considering the complexity of the project and the multitude of on- and off-ramps, the nightly lane closures and work zones, installed per-plan, are working very well," said Ruiz. "They are very clear and defined for the motoring public."

The interchange is within a heavily traveled urban corridor and one of the biggest challenges was to provide a design that could be constructed while maintaining traffic throughout the project site. Detours and lane closures are planned to avoid pattern overlaps and traffic volumes are monitored on a regular basis using Smart Work Zones (SWZ), which are applications of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) utilized to help improve safety and mobility.

The new structures are designed for a 75-year design life.

The management and protection of traffic plan includes closures and detours, and daytime and nightly lane and ramp closures based on the work scheduled, such as paving and steel erection. To get materials and equipment on to the project site, the team uses the temporary lane closures and/or off-peak hours. CTDOT is maintaining all existing lanes during off-peak hours.

The joints on the COB consist of a molded rubber and a steel expansion joint unit, which accommodates structural movements and concrete headers. High strength aluminum wear-plates are molded into the top surface and grooved to provide skid resistance. The concrete header will be normal deck concrete, while the joint itself is rubber, steel and aluminum. While not exactly the same, the new joints are very similar to the existing joints.

The pavement surface on the Route 3 ramp is known as a High Friction Surface Treatment (HFST), composed of calcined bauxite aggregate that is bonded to the existing pavement surface with epoxy. HFSTs are increasingly used nationwide due to what many regard as superior friction characteristics. CTDOT is looking for further opportunities to use the material in additional areas that have a high friction demand.

For the roadway areas being widened, the existing poles, foundations and underground foundations are being removed and replaced, and new LED luminaires will be installed. In the areas where no roadway changes are occurring — I-91 southbound, COB, I-91 and the Route 3 Interchange — the existing lighting infrastructure will remain, but the high pressure sodium (HPS) lights are being converted to LED. Existing HPS under bridge luminaires are being converted to LED within the project limits.

Michael Daley, OGBHD's project manager, who has managed several large projects, noted that the two JV partners have worked together on previous projects, and that the JV and CTDOT are united in ensuring the outcome is a success.

Thus far, the JV has completed the I-91 median from Cove Bridge to Route 5/15 Bridge, I-91 NB sign structures, I-91 concrete pavement repairs and substructure on bridges 6947, 6000, 0480 and 1466. The 2021 construction season will focus on opening the new I-91 northbound ramp to Route 5/15 northbound over the COB, completed I-91 northbound and southbound, including ramps and East Hartford Bridges at Silver Lane and Main Street.

The project has its challenges, including securing experienced construction workers.

"Obtaining and developing the best trade's people possible, while maintaining productivity, are our overall challenges," said Daley. "Without them, the work cannot get done or be done to the highest standards. General Superintendent Larry Doyon, Roadway Superintendent Bill Noll, Bridge Superintendent Bob Nardi, and Night Superintendent Ryan O'Halpin have done an awesome job of finding these trades people and training them for the future."

"They have been working with the unions and other sources to obtain the best possible trades people in order to get the work done with the best quality and safety in mind, while maintaining the schedule," he added. "They used a retired foreman to help train the new foreman and trades people not only to make sure this project goes well, but to build a future for the company. We give them all the credit. It's a real team-effort."

Soil issues are minimal, and water and utility issues were overcome with the assistance of the CTDOT, WSP and CME.

Careful coordination allows crews to work day and night shifts at multiple locations.

"Bill Noll has been key in coordinating all aspects of the night work and making sure they run smoothly and productively with the day work," said Daley. "This project has tight work zones. We work with CTDOT and WSP on each work zone to make sure we have the safety of the traveling public, as well as that of our own workers in mind."

Despite the many elements, Daley keeps his eyes on the prize.

"The key construction activities are completing the first stage of the Charter Oak Bridge widening and the new off-ramp Bridge (6947) from I-91 NB to Route 5/15 NB by May 26, 2021," he said. "We have worked around-the-clock to complete these bridges this year so we can tie them in by next May. Challenges started with utilities, piles and bridge substructure — piers and abutment — and now have moved on to the bridge superstructure — the decks. Each activity was addressed with CTDOT, WSP and CME as the work progressed. Utilities were relocated, piles driven through caissons and bridge structures formed and poured."

Specialty equipment such as an ICE Auger 5550 for drilling and ICE vibratory and diesel hammers are helping push the project.

"We will be working through this winter to maintain the schedule," said Daley. "Any work that can be done in the cold weather will be done."

Daley is assisted by Kevin Mierzejewski, James Drake, Kevin Bernard, Michelle Fredette, Brett Stackhouse, Craig Miller, Joe Hudach, Joe Sefcik, Mike Lenhardt, Kevin Voelker, Nate Marsili, Paul Kuna and Jenica Herazo.

"The team is working well together," said Daley. "All work is done ahead of schedule and any issues that come up are addressed quickly to keep the project moving. The crews have been great, working safely and pushing through the work to stay on schedule while we deal with the current health issues."

Peak days have 220 construction workers on site, with local and regional subcontractors brought on board.

Excavation and demolition is expected to generate 25,000 tons of concrete, 210,000 tons of asphalt, 1,000 tons of steel, and 170,000 tons of earth and rock. For new materials, the JV is bringing in 31,000 tons of concrete, 260,000 tons of asphalt and 5,800 tons of steel.

"We are reusing as much of the earth excavation as much as possible;" said Daley. "Recycling is very important to us, but due to the specifications, reuse of materials is limited."

Other equipment on-site includes: Cat 345 and 330 excavators, Cat D4 and D6 dozers, Cat 966 loaders, Cat and Bomag rollers, Woodings drills, Grove and Manitowoc cranes, and Kenworth tri-axles and crash trucks.

Maintenance is crucial to ensure production is continuous.

"We have three mechanics on duty between the day and night shifts," said Daley, "and we keep tabs on the equipment on a daily basis and repair as necessary."

OGBHD purchases and rents equipment from dealerships such as H.O. Penn in Newington, W.I. Clark in Wallingford, and Shawmut Equipment in Manchester (all in Connecticut), and ICE Incorporated in Sayreville, N.J. CEG


Data center tax-break vote delayed despite governor’s endorsement

Liese Klein  The State House approved a fast-tracked bill this week that would give tax breaks to data centers setting up shop in Connecticut. 

House Bill 6514 would waive state sales taxes for 20 years on any company that invests at least $200 million on a data center in the state, or invests $50 million if the data center is located in a designated enterprise zone. The bill was approved 133-13 on Wednesday.

Some lawmakers questioned the energy usage and environmental impact of data centers, in addition to the fast-tracked process the bill went through before adoption. To address those questions, a planned Senate vote on the bill was delayed until to Monday,

“Connecticut needs to get in the game and bring this industry to our state,” Gov. Ned Lamont said in a statement of support for the bill. “This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to show the technology industry that Connecticut supports this sector and we welcome their development in our state.”

With 11 data centers currently located in Connecticut, technology boosters are seeking incentives to lure more companies into locating here and creating highly paid IT jobs.

“We need to approach emerging technologies like these data centers with the utmost focus, as they represent changing trends and stronger economic results,” State Sen. Steve Cassano (D-Manchester) in support for the bill. “A warmer reception to these locations in our state could lead to many strong years of business growth and resulting economic strength.”

A data center, defined as a facility built to house a group of networked computer servers, would also be exempt from any financial transactions tax or fee that may be imposed by the state through trades of stocks, bonds, or any other financial products for 30 years from the date a new facility is completed.


Torrington residents invited to informational hearing on road projects

TORRINGTON — The city is developing plans to reconstruct various roads on the north end of the city, including Alice Street, Benham Street, Brightwood Avenue, Calhoun Street, Eastwood Road, Lorenzo Street, Margerie Street and Pythian Avenue, and the sidewalks on Dawes Avenue, Lois Street and Northridge Avenue, according to a statement.

The road construction project includes paving, new curbing, sidewalk replacement and associated miscellaneous work, which will provide for safer vehicular, and pedestrian travel. The project is financed through the City of Torrington Pavement Management Program Bond Fund.

City officials expect construction to begin in the spring of 2021.

“It is the City’s policy to keep persons informed and involved when such projects are undertaken. It is important that the community share its concerns to assist in the project’s development,” officials said in the statement.

Residents are invited to attend an information meeting on Zoom at 6 p.m. March 8. The meeting is not in-person and will not be held at City Hall.

To attend the meeting, go to https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82266694179?pwd=ejc5TnRrZkJMWjR4dXJkUVU5Q3Irdz09. The meeting ID is 822 6669 4179; passcode is Z8dra4


Attorney General Tong investigating Connecticut Port Authority

Marc E. Fitch  Attorney General William Tong confirmed that his office is investigating the Connecticut Port Authority in a letter to Senate Republican Leader Kevin Kelly, R-Stratford, and Sen. Paul Formica, R-East Lyme, who asked the attorney general to review contracts and payouts made by the quasi-public agency.

“In concert with the Auditors, we are currently in the process of investigating the issues raised in [the auditors] reports, particularly with respect to the CPA’s contract with Seabury Capital, and any possible violations of law or the state Code of Ethics,” Tong wrote in his response.

The State Contracting Standards Board found the Port Authority had paid Seabury Capital “more than $700,000” to find an operator for the State Pier Project in New London, including a “success fee” of $523,500.

Seabury selected Gateway Terminal as the operator for the State Pier, part of the $157 million project to turn the State Pier into a staging area for an offshore wind farm being developed by Eversource and Danish Company Ørsted. 

Gateway was already operating another pier nearby in New Haven, according to Jon Lender of the Hartford Courant.

Formica said the success fee amounted to a finder’s fee that was larger than the Port Authority’s annual budget. Furthermore, The Day’s David Collins reported that Seabury Capital employs former CPA board member Henry Juan III, although Juan was not a board member when the contract was signed.

“We are aware of public allegations concerning the so-called ‘success fee’ paid to Seabury Capital and possible conflicts of interest, and we will investigate those allegations,” Tong wrote.

The embattled Connecticut Port Authority has, for several years, faced intense scrutiny from lawmakers after auditors and whistleblowers revealed the agency had spent lavishly on travel expenses, awarded contracts to business associates and hired family members, resulting in several board members stepping down.

Tong initially rejected a 2019 request from former Senate Republican Leader Len Fasano, R-North Haven, to review bids and contracts at the Port Authority because it was a matter for the Auditors of Public Accounts.

However, the attorney general wrote that he initiated an investigation “upon receipt of the Auditors’ two whistleblower reports.” 

In an interview, Formica says he is pleased Tong is looking into the matter and hopes the investigation will shed transparency on the embattled CPA.

“Senator Kelly and I are looking for transparency in the discussion and what’s going on,” Formica said. “I’d like to take the focus away from the problems at CPA and return to the mission of developing the port and moving the offshore wind development forward.”

“The true mission of the Port Authority is to enhance economically the large and small ports for the state of Connecticut, and in particular the State Pier in New London and getting down to the job of promoting this offshore wind development, which going to help provide the energy generation the state is going to need over the next decade,” Formica said.

Tong also issued a formal opinion indicating that the State Contracting Standards Board had little jurisdiction over the Connecticut Port Authority’s contracts after the SCSB voiced concerns over the Port Authority’s contracts and, more generally, quasi-public agencies.

Tong wrote the SCSB’s authority is limited to deciding a bidder’s contest on issues not involving real estate. 

“Ultimately, the Board’s power is relatively limited when it comes to quasi-public agencies generally,” Tong wrote. “The General Assembly would have to change the statutes to expand the Board’s oversight.




February 25, 2021

CT Construction Digest Thursday February 25, 2021

Release of Biden's infrastructure plan details delayed

Zachary Phillips  

  • President Joe Biden’s first address to a joint session of Congress — where he is expected to outline specific goals and priorities for measures like an infrastructure package — will not occur this month as was expected.
  • The speech will most likely take place in mid-March, according to legislative experts from contractor groups, who said it has been pushed back due to lawmakers' focus this month on former President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial and on passing a new COVID-19 relief package.
  • The coronavirus package is legislators’ top priority, as they eye a March 14 deadline on unemployment benefits. Biden’s address would likely come shortly after a decision on the bill, which could face some hurdles, according to USA Today.

Contractors have eagerly awaited details of Biden’s multitrillion Build Back Better infrastructure plan, which he said he will provide when he speaks to Congress. 

It’s likely Biden will take the opportunity next month to address lawmakers, touting what he believes will be a win for the COVID-19 relief package, before focusing on the next priorities, said Jimmy Christianson, vice president of government relations at the Associated General Contractors of America. Although Biden has said infrastructure will be one of his administration’s top priorities, there are many questions that contractors are waiting for the president to answer. 

“Every contractor is interested in the opportunity for more work,” Christianson said, “but infrastructure has been the bridesmaid many times.” He said there is both skepticism and optimism surrounding an infrastructure package, as contractors would relish the opportunity for more work even though there will almost certainly be new federal strings attached.

Project labor agreements and local hiring mandates could impact contractors working on federal projects, and build new hoops for them to jump through. Additionally, it’s not clear whether the infrastructure package will come from deficit spending or raised taxes. Christianson also said he anticipates that Biden will emphasize renewable energy practices, following the recent weather-induced power outages in Texas and surrounding states.

The route to an infrastructure package isn’t clear, said Peter Comstock, director of legislative affairs at Associated Builders and Contractors, and will depend on bipartisan support and budget reconciliation — a fast-tracking process for bills embodied in Congress’ budget resolution. How long it will take is still unclear, Comstock said, but a move toward a big infrastructure bill will likely have a September 2021 deadline, when the extension on the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act extension runs out.

“They do have [that] deadline. Whether or not they kick the can or do something substantial has yet to be seen,” Comstock said.


House approves big municipal aid pledge, tax incentive bills

and     The House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved a measure Wednesday that effectively promises $110 million to $120 million in new annual aid to cities and towns — but doesn’t officially fund the initiative just yet.

The House also endorsed fast-track legislation from Gov. Ned Lamont’s administration to encourage data center development in Connecticut.

Both measures now head to the Senate, which had been scheduled to meet Thursday but now plans to meet on Monday.

“Today is a little different, it’s unorthodox,” House Speaker Matt Ritter, D-Hartford, said before Wednesday’s session, at which lawmakers endorsed a new new program to bolster non-education aid for communities with large quantities of tax-exempt property. “We want to put a marker down.”

The “marker” Ritter referenced involves the state budget for the 2021-22 and 2022-23 fiscal years — a package not expected to be adopted before May or later. More specifically, the enhanced PILOT or Payment In Lieu Of Taxes grant methodology that cleared the House doesn’t include a mechanism to pay for it.

But Ritter said local finance boards and municipal councils across Connecticut can count on those additional funds being included in the next two-year state budget roughly three months from now.

“It’s going to be a cornerstone of what we do,” the speaker added. “We want them to feel confident they can rely on … these figures.”

Legislatures and governors have struggled to maintain their commitment to PILOT over the past two decades as surging pension and other debt costs have consumed more and more of the state budget.

PILOT grants are supposed to replace about 45% of the funds communities lose because they can’t tax state property. Communities currently get less than 15% back, according to the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities. Similarly, the grants once designed to replace 77% of taxes lost on nonprofit colleges and hospitals now cover less than 25%.

No community would receive less PILOT aid than it currently does through the bill under consideration, but those in low-income municipalities would receive additional funds.

Gov. Ned Lamont, who did not propose any additional PILOT funding in the biennial budget he recommended on Feb. 10, instead proposed giving towns a one-time $100 million boost in non-education aid next fiscal year — with half coming from state borrowing and half from emergency federal coronavirus relief funds.

Lamont nonetheless backed the measure passed in the House on Wednesday by a margin of 125-24. “Changes to our PILOT program will help lift up our cities, the cultural heartbeats of our state, and provide them with the resources they need to thrive,” the governor said.

Rep. Holly Cheeseman of East Lyme, ranking House Republican on the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee, questioned why majority Democrats were enacting a bill that guaranteed no funding, offering little more than a promise.

But Cheeseman, who voted for the bill, added that towns desperately need the funds and warned lawmakers would be held accountable if they don’t deliver the dollars in May.

“If we don’t live up to our word as a legislature,” she added, Connecticut would have to “change our motto from the Land of Steady Habits to the Land of Broken Promises.”

Advocates for cities and towns, which have seen their finances rocked by the coronavirus pandemic and related economic chaos, expressed similar sentiments this week.

“Our hope is that it’s not just very real this year, but that it’s sustainable,” said Joe DeLong, executive director of the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities, who added that communities are grateful for all the added support. “There has to be a commitment here.”

Elizabeth Gara, executive director of the Connecticut Council of Small Towns, called any effort to reverse the trend in PILOT grants “good news” but added the “PILOT funding is only a piece of the puzzle, and we hope this doesn’t impact the other levels of municipal aid.”

Majority Democrats also wrote two other components into the bill that, at other times, might have been offered as separate measures.

One, which enjoyed strong bipartisan support, would clarify that more than 100,000 Connecticut residents who work in other states and pay income taxes to those jurisdictions still can get a credit for those taxes on their Connecticut returns.

New York and Massachusetts enacted laws holding that telecommuters working from home for “convenience” actually owed taxes first to their employers’ home state. Connecticut responded with its own convenience law in 2019, and those and other northeastern states are battling the issue out in federal court.

The second additional concept wrapped into the municipal grant bill would end the controversial practice of placing liens on the homes of former welfare recipients.

More than 50 members of the GOP minority — many of whom objected to the welfare lien component — tried unsuccessfully to amend the bill to break it down into its components. 

Some Republicans charged that it was a political stunt to force those who wanted to protect workers at risk of double-taxation to support other concepts at the same time.

“Why are we not doing separate bills? I don’t think it’s proper,” said Rep. David Yaccarino, R-North Haven. “It just goes back to transparency.”

Tax incentives for data center development

The House did tackle a second, separate fiscal bill Wednesday, voting 133-13 to approve legislation that would waive state sales tax obligations for 20 years for any data center that invests at least $200 million in the state — or just $50 million if the facility is located within a state-designated enterprise zone.

The sales tax exemption would be extended to 30 years if a $400 million investment is made, or a $200 million investment in an enterprise zone.


New London community recreation center gains key approvals

Greg Smith  New London — A planned $30 million community recreation center received two key endorsements this month.

The city’s Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously agreed to issue a positive referral on use of land at Fort Trumbull for the planned facility.

The Renaissance City Development Association, the city’s development arm that markets the Fort Trumbull property, likewise approved of the use of the land and determined it was in line with a Fort Trumbull Municipal Development Plan approved in 2000.

The Planning and Zoning Commission’s vote came earlier this month as part of a statutory review triggered whenever the city plans a change of use, sale or purchase of property. A negative referral would have forced a two-thirds vote, instead of a majority vote, by the City Council on upcoming approvals related to the community center.

The City Council already has approved the bonding for the estimated cost of the facility, which is still early in the planning stages.

The Planning and Zoning Commission is still in the position to approve or reject the future site plans for the community center once it progresses to that point. The city is putting together criteria in anticipation of hiring an owner’s representative and a project manager for the project.

The early plan developed by consulting firm Brailsford and Dunlavey calls for a 62,000-square foot facility to house gymnasiums, a six-lane indoor pool and space enough to house the city’s Recreation Department and its various programs. The estimated $2.1 million in annual operational costs would be funded through memberships and rental income. Rates would be offered on a sliding scale to accommodate lower-income families.

Prior to its nod of approval, the RCDA sought a legal opinion on use of the land — nearly 7 acres encompassed by parcels 3C and 3B — in consideration of a Fort Trumbull Municipal Development Plan.

That plan led to acquisition of properties, demolition of buildings, environmental remediation and infrastructure improvements.

It was also a major source of controversy and an eminent domain struggle that concluded with the landmark 2005 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Kelo v. City of New London. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld actions of the RCDA’s predecessor, the New London Development Corp., in implementing the plan.

Mark S. Zamarka, attorney for the RCDA, said that the proposed use is consistent with the Fort Trumbull Municipal Development Plan, city zoning regulations and Kelo v. City of New London ruling.

“Pursuant to section 5.1 the proposed land uses for parcel 3 include a ‘health club complex with pool,’ which will be ‘available to ... members of the business and residential communities in the city,’” Zamarka wrote.

“Moreover, the community center would serve the City as a whole. This is consistent with the holding in KELO, wherein the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the actions taken by the New London Development Corporation (NLDC) in implementing the MDP,” he said.

Zamarka cited Justice John Paul Stevens, who wrote for the majority in the Kelo ruling and who “emphasized that the MDP served a public purpose and was not solely for economic benefit.”

The idea of constructing a community center at Fort Trumbull has raised some eyebrows from some who have argued the land is better suited for a taxable development. The RCDA lists 35 acres of development project sites in the more than 80 acres encompassed by the MDP.

City officials have argued that if properly done, the facility would serve to attract more development on the peninsula.

Planning and Zoning Commission member Ronna Stuller at this month’s meeting said she was in favor of the community center but disappointed the city had not been more imaginative when planning for the location. The site of the proposed apartment complex on Howard Street, she said, would have been a more visible, if not more accessible, spot.

Brailsford and Dunlavey had ranked several possible sites for the facility, places like Ocean Beach Park and Bates Woods, and determined Fort Trumbull was the highest-ranked choice.

Planning and Zoning Commission Chairman Barry Levine at this month’s meeting said he was “150%” in favor of a recreation center but asked, among other things, that city officials and the City Council go into the project with “eyes wide open.”

“The city does not have a great record of maintaining its properties,” Levine said, echoing similar criticism from members of the public. He said he worried about maintenance and repair costs as well as projected revenues.

“I hope the council takes a careful and sober look at whatever comes before them moving forward,” he said.

Mayor Michael Passero said sustainability was one of his own main concerns about a community center project but said the proper study was completed to crunch the numbers. He said third-party management will be a key to maintaining the membership base needed to support the facility “and most importantly to support the marginalized and less capitalized members of our community that will benefit from this facility.”


Norwich receives bids for Franklin Square roundabout project

Norwich — The city received 10 bids ranging from $538,899 to $1.2 million Wednesday for the plan to convert the Franklin Square intersection of Main and Franklin streets into a roundabout that would allow two-way traffic in all directions.

The project calls for removing two traffic lights on Main Street and a stop sign on the southbound lane of Franklin Street and allowing Franklin Street traffic to continue directly to Main Street. Currently, Franklin Street traffic must stop a block short of Main Street and divert along Bath and lower Broadway to reach Main Street. On-street parking would be adjusted, as well.

Nunes Companies of Ludlow, Mass., submitted the low bid of $538,899 for the project, plus $74,169 for an alternate bid item to install stamped concrete for walkways.

The city received a $400,000 state transportation grant for the project. City Public Works Director Patrick McLaughlin said he never expected the grant to pay for the entire project, and the low bid was about what he expected. The rest of the project cost would come from the $5 million road improvements bond voters approved in November 2019.

McLaughlin said if the bid is approved, the project could go forward in April, when seasonal asphalt plants reopen.


Apartment plan near UConn Health draws Farmington neighbors’ opposition




Don Stacom  A developer’s plan for 146 apartments near the UConn Health Center is drawing stiff neighborhood opposition.

Farmington-based Metro Realty Group is presenting its plan as a way to bring modern apartments to a stretch of Route 4 that has become a medical and technology jobs corridor.

But more than 80 homeowners are urging town officials to reject a zone change for the project, warning that it would worsen traffic, harm the environment and ruin the atmosphere of their neighborhood.

“Our privacy will be eliminated, our home devalued and we have serious concerns that a project of this magnitude will disrupt the natural flow of water, pollute our well and add serious noise and light pollution,” Craig and Teresa Korsen told Farmington’s planning and zoning commission.

Corporate neighbors, however, are strongly in favor of the plan. UConn Health, the Carrier Corp, Jackson Laboratory and Stanley Black & Decker all have encouraged the town to approve Metro Realty’s plan.

“There is no doubt this type of housing will improve the attractiveness of the corridor for both our student and employment base, which is an important component of our ability to attract top talent,” Chris Hyers, a UConn Health vice president, told the town in a letter.

Metro Realty is proposing the four-story complex for a wooded area on the opposite side of Farmington Avenue from the UConn Health building.

The property is behind the Hartford Health Care Medical Group’s office at 406 Farmington Ave. It would be built off a dead end called Quarry Road, with the entrance drive reaching Farmington Avenue roughly across from the Homewood Suites hotel.

Metro Realty would need a zone change to proceed. Neighbors have been pressing for a “no” vote because, they say, a 45-foot-high building in a previously undisturbed woodland simply isn’t in keeping with what the town’s development plan recommends.

“This large facility seems horribly and unfairly intrusive to the residents of Prattling Pond Road,” wrote Mountain Spring Road homeowner Martin Pazzani. “A historically wooded and private area becomes a crowded residential area for no logical reason.”

Pazzani and other neighbors warn that if Farmington authorizes this project, it would invite more.

“What’s to prevent another developer from forcing a similar project next to the Hillstead Museum or some other town landmark?,” Pazzani asked.

To the major employers in the area, though, the prospect means affordable, modern and convenient rental housing in a section of town that has very little.





February 24, 2021

CT Construction Digest Wednesday February 24, 2021

Wilton working with Norwalk to oversee river valley trail construction

J.D. Freda  WILTON — As the Norwalk River Valley Trail inches closer to completion, the town has agreed to jointly oversee the construction and maintenance of the decadelong trail project with the city of Norwalk and a nonprofit.

The trail has had various additions through its construction phases. The final leg of the planned 30-mile stretch of recreational path beginning in Calf Pasture Beach in Norwalk and traversing north through areas of Wilton up to Danbury was agreed upon in a $2.9 million bid late last year.

As the parties involved are hoping to eye an end to this longstanding project, attorney Doug LoMonte, of Bercham Moses PC, presented a three-party agreement between the Norwalk, Friends of the Norwalk River Valley Trail and Wilton for consideration to the Board of Selectmen at its Feb. 16 meeting.

The cooperation agreement, which was approved unanimously, includes the oversight of construction, maintenance and insuring of the trail.

“This has (felt) like pushing a rock uphill for several years,” Selectwoman Deborah McFadden said. “I am so happy and just want to congratulate everybody for their hard work and tenacity to get us to this moment. It is a hallelujah moment.”

The agreement focused on the stretch of trail that straddles the Wilton and Norwalk border.

According to LoMonte, Friends of the NRVT secured a $1.1 million trail improvement grant through the state’s Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. Wilton will serve as the grant administrator, giving the town the responsibility of providing financial reporting functions and serve as the contracting party in regards to construction on that stretch of the trail.

Town Chief Financial Officer Anne Kelly-Lenz will take the lead in the financial reporting of the project, according to LoMonte.

“Wilton, Norwalk and (Friends of NRVT) are parties to a 26-team funding agreement,” LoMonte said, detailing the scope of this project.

The trail construction of the Wilton-Norwalk stretch will use 80 percent funds from the state grant. The other 20 percent, according to LoMonte, will be picked up by the Friends of NRVT. The nonprofit’s contribution will cover up to $275,125 for the total project.

But Friends of NRVT’s onus does not stop there.

Friends of NRVT will be responsible for construction management during the building of the project and trail management once it is completed. The trio reached a comprehensive management plan mutually agreed upon by all parties, LoMonte said.

Assistant Director of Public Works and Town Engineer Frank Smeriglio will assist in the construction management process along with Friends of NRVT. The Department of Public Works of Norwalk will play a key role as well.

The nonprofit also has an obligation to address any budget overrun, including if a potential bid is accepted over the currently agreed to budget.

Under the cooperation agreement, Norwalk and Wilton would have the ability to observe parts of the trail not in their jurisdiction for oversight during the construction phase, LoMonte said.

The project is slated to break ground this spring.


Developers hope Bridgeport’s newly named Hartford HealthCare Amphitheater on track for packed concerts

  BRIDGEPORT — Whether showing off an impressive feat of engineering — the steel masts and cables that will support a massive tentlike roof — or small details like how each backstage bathroom has different multicolored shower tiles, Howard Saffan remains passionate about a concert amphitheater he has spent four years developing.

“This will be state-of-the-art when you open up the doors,” Saffan said Tuesday while leading Hearst Connecticut Media on a tour of the nearly finished venue built from the bones of Bridgeport’s one-time minor league baseball park. “It should be an absolute architectural marvel.”

Saffan and his partner in the venture, veteran concert promoter Jim Koplik of Live Nation, were on hand at the amphitheater with other officials Tuesday to celebrate another milestone in their joint venture: The announcement that Hartford HealthCare, which in 2019 acquired Bridgeport-based St. Vincent’s Medical Center, had purchased the naming rights to the amphitheater.

And while many average music fans are likely more focused on when the initial concert lineup will be revealed, Saffan argued having Hartford HealthCare on the venue’s signage, letterhead and advertising is huge: “That sets the tone. ... That tells everybody this is a significant place. Putting a premium name on here is everything.”

The looming question is, given the coronavirus pandemic, when will members of the general public and big name musical acts experience Saffan’s accomplishment?

“This is all in a state of flux,” he admitted.

Saffan said he intends to host graduations come May. He hopes that by summer, enough of Connecticut’s population will be vaccinated against COVID-19 and the infection rate will be so low that state officials will allow him to fill the amphitheater’s entire 5,700 seats at a single event.

And because the attraction needs plenty of lead time to book acts and sell tickets, Saffan said the state “need(s) to make a commitment that says, ideally, come June 1, you can go 100 percent to concerts,” he said. “There’s no reason not to.”

As of Tuesday morning, however, the state Department of Economic Development, which has helped the governor regulate how Connecticut has safely done business during the year-long global health crisis, was aiming to allow outdoor concert venues to host only 50 percent of their audience capacity by the spring or summer.

“It’s really too early to be really definitive about that time frame,” said Jim Watson, a DECD spokesman. There are a lot of variables in place, he said, including the vaccine roll out and the rise of new COVID-19 variants.

Koplik, in a brief interview Tuesday, told Hearst opening the Bridgeport amphitheater to half capacity — 2,850 — would likely not be “economically viable.”

“One hundred percent (capacity). That’s what I’m hoping,” Koplik said.

“Artists aren’t going to take 50 percent” profits to tour, Saffan agreed.

During the news conference announcing the new name of the amphitheater, Koplik referred to the impact the pandemic has had on live entertainment and his optimism about the vaccinations being distributed by Hartford HealthCare and other medical providers.

“Our business is, essentially, closed,” he said. “And Hartford HealthCare is helping open us up.”

Hartford HealthCare Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey Flaks used the official announcement Tuesday to present a hopeful message about a return to normal and large gatherings “in a short period of time.”

“We’re turning the corner right now,” Flaks said.

Leading Hearst through the amphitheater’s lower concourse, then onto the stage and inside the backstage facilities, Saffan said that even if Connecticut is in a very good place, COVID-wise, this summer, the availability of acts will be dictated by the health of the rest of the country.

“It doesn’t just involve Connecticut,” Saffan said, naming one veteran artist whose identity he did not want revealed who will come to Bridgeport in 2022 but is not traveling this year.

And when people are able to attend shows at the amphitheater, there will still be reminders of the health crisis. Saffan said ticketholders will have to show proof of vaccination, proof of a negative COVID-19 test or receive a rapid one on site, and wear masks: “We want every guest feeling comfortable.”

Saffan and Live Nation plan on announcing the first performers in late March. Around that same time, the roof will be going up and cosmetic final touches made.

When Saffan first approached the city in 2017 with Koplik about transforming the Bridgeport-owned ballpark into a live music venue, the partnership had hoped to open in 2019. But construction delays, then the pandemic, pushed that off two years.

The original price tag was $15 million, split between the developers and Mayor Joe Ganim’s administration. Then last year, Saffan sought and received another $4.5 million from Bridgeport, arguing the two-decade old ballpark was in poorer shape than he had been told and that the developers invested far more than their initial share.

On Tuesday, he refused to provide a new cost total. But at times Saffan admitted he likely has gotten “carried away” in striving for perfection. He said he wants to ensure ticketholders and performers return and also spread the word about the new concert showcase in Bridgeport.

“This is called ‘getting carried away,’” Saffan said, gazing from the stage upward at the roof infrastructure he likens to 1 million pounds of steel bicycle spokes. “It’s what I call the ‘holy s**t’ moment.’”


Danbury’s downtown ‘needs to be refreshed’: City to start streetscape project amid COVID

DANBURY — The long-awaited plan to liven the city’s downtown faces new urgency and challenges as the local business struggle during the coronavirus pandemic.

Construction is expected to start in the spring on the first phase of a roughly $12 million project to upgrade the sidewalks and install amenities to make the downtown more pedestrian friendly and appealing to shoppers, diners and developers.

“It just needs to be refreshed,” Mayor Joe Cavo said. “If we want to have an active, bustling downtown, we have to have it so it looks right and people will want to come here.”

The project comes as local businesses face challenges, including fewer office workers in the area, due to the pandemic.

Most downtown businesses have held on through COVID, but beautifying the area could attract people, said Angela Wong, executive director of CityCenter Danbury.

“Hopefully they’ll bring in some new eyes and ears and customers to the businesses,” she said. “Really, now more than ever, it’s a great opportunity and it’s a very positive change.”

‘Catalyst’ for development

Downtown’s sidewalks have not been upgraded in about 30 years and heave in places, said Sharon Calitro, city planner.

“The improved infrastructure of the streetscape is a catalyst for future development,” she said. “In order to incentivize people to invest in the downtown, in the heart of the city, we need to continue our commitment to improve what that area looks like and feels like.”

Developers are building 150 apartments at the former News-Times building, while the 374 luxury apartments in Kennedy Flats have been popular.

The idea is to connect places like the library and historic buildings to the bus and train stations, Calitro said.

This will be beneficial for existing businesses, too, Wong said.

“Having more foot traffic for the local businesses and accessibility is going to be key for them,” she said.

The first phase includes redoing the Danbury Green and installing streetscape on Delay Street, National Place, Railroad Place, Ives Street and parts of White Street and Post Office Walk. Construction — delayed last year due to COVID — is expected to take about four months.

The city is evaluating four bids to do that phase for under $2.2 million, Calitro said

“We’re just excited to break ground,” she said. “It will be beautiful when it’s done.”

Grants and money approved by City Council last year cover the cost.

The more complex second phase upgrades sidewalks on both sides of Main Street from the Connecticut Institute for Communities to the Kennedy Flats area. Patriot Drive, Independence Way, Liberty Street and Kennedy Park are included. Main Street is a state road, so this requires more complicated state approvals, Calitro said.

A river walk on Crosby Street along the Still River is also envisioned, but will be constructed separately, she said.

COVID’s impact

A new business — Gomez Bakery on Main Street — opened during the pandemic, while Empire of the Incas upgraded its facade thanks to a $10,000 city grant.

“There has actually been some really great wins, despite COVID,” Wong said. “It’s actually been really beneficial in terms of they’ve [businesses] banned together to help one another in the downtown.”

Cavo anticipates COVID will bring “profound changes” to how people work and more, but that the city must stick to its long-range plan for the downtown.

“We have to be ready because eventually we will come out of COVID,” he said.

The vaccine could hopefully bring some workers back to their offices soon, Wong said. Regardless, residents will still want to come to downtown for dining, retail and eventually a return to concerts on the green, she said.

“People will still be seeking out other aspects of downtown,” she said.

Calitro said she expects the downtown to succeed in the long term because COVID has shown people how important getting outside can be.

“During COVID and post COVID, the urban centers are going to thrive,” she said. “People want to live in a place where they can walk and we’re creating an environment to improve pedestrian accessibility.”

The project’s focus on accessibility to transportation hubs remains, despite the decline in train ridership during the pandemic, Calitro said.

“We can’t sustain this auto-dependent society forever,” she said.


CT legislature poised to make early budget pledge to help cities and towns

Keith M. Phaneuf   The House of Representatives is expected to approve an omnibus bill Wednesday that commits more than $100 million in new aid to municipalities, shields thousands of residents with out-of-state employers from double taxation, and ends the controversial practice of placing liens on the homes of former welfare recipients.

Legislative leaders also were considering a proposal from Gov. Ned Lamont’s administration to offer sales tax incentives to promote development of data centers, but it was unclear late Tuesday whether that bill would proceed Wednesday. If the bill does advance in the House, tentative plans call for the Senate to consider it Thursday.

The linchpin of the House agenda, though, involves a proposal from Senate President Pro Tem Martin M. Looney, D-New Haven, to overhaul two non-education grants that offset a portion of the revenue communities lose because state property, colleges and hospitals are exempt from local taxation.

What’s particularly unusual about this bill is that municipal aid — or any large component of the state budget — normally isn’t resolved until the session is nearly at its close in May.

Lawmakers making an early budget promise of more aid to towns

“I think the intent of tomorrow is to put a marker in the budget,” Rep. Sean Scanlon, D-Guilford, co-chair of the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee, said Tuesday. “We are making a very strong statement to say we’re going to figure this out.”

What’s to figure out?

For one thing, Gov. Ned Lamont didn’t include any increases in PILOT (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) funds in the $46 billion, two-year budget he proposed to legislators on Feb. 10. Instead, he proposed combining $50 million in state borrowing with $50 million in unused federal pandemic relief funds to bolster non-education aid to municipalities, but only for the 2021-22 fiscal year.

Still, the Democratic governor said last month he was “intrigued” by Looney’s proposal to boost PILOT, which is particularly crucial for poor cities, which tend to have higher mill rates and a greater share of tax-exempt property than smaller municipalities.

And then there’s the statutory spending cap.

Lamont, who’s unwilling to exceed the cap legally, proposed a plan that falls $103 million below that limit next fiscal year, and $115 million below in 2022-23.

Legislators still were negotiating final details of the House bill late Tuesday, but Scanlon said the PILOT program would involve close to $110 million per year in new funds for municipalities.

That proposal, if combined with Lamont’s budget, would push the plan over the cap in the first year and dangerously close in the second. And some Democratic legislators also want to add back more spending for education, health care and other priorities.

But Scanlon said lawmakers are committed to working everything out.

PILOT grant has a shaky history

Joe DeLong, executive director of the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities, said cities and towns, which have seen their finances rocked by the coronavirus pandemic and related economic chaos, would be grateful for the aid.

But DeLong also said state officials need to look at Connecticut’s finances and ensure they can provide this relief for many years to come.

“Our hope is that it’s not just very real this year, but that it’s sustainable,” he said. “There has to be a commitment here.”

Rep. Holly Cheeseman of East Lyme, ranking House Republican on the finance committee, agreed that legislators cannot dangle additional PILOT funds and then withdraw them.

“If we make a promise,” she said, “we should also figure out a way to keep it.”

Legislatures and governors have struggled to maintain their commitment to PILOT over the past two decades as surging pension and other debt costs consume more and more of the state budget.

For example, PILOT grants are supposed to replace about 45% of the funds communities lose because they can’t tax state property. Communities currently get less than 15% back, according to CCM.

Similarly, the grants once designed to replace 77% of taxes lost on nonprofit colleges and hospitals now cover less than 25%.

No community would receive less PILOT aid than it currently does through the bill under consideration, but those in low-income municipalities would receive additional funds.

Guarding against double taxation, stopping welfare-related liens

The bill scheduled to go to the House also includes at least two other budget-related components.

One would clarify that Connecticut residents who work in other states and pay income taxes to those jurisdictions still can get a credit for those taxes on their Connecticut returns.

New York and Massachusetts enacted laws holding that telecommuters working from home for “convenience” actually owed taxes first to their employers’ home state. Connecticut responded with its own convenience law in 2019, and those and other northeastern states are battling the issue out in federal court.

But legislative leaders from both parties said recently a clarifying measure was necessary to ensure — until the legal fight is over — that Connecticut residents don’t feel pressured to pay income taxes to two states at once.

A third component of Wednesday’s House bill would end Connecticut’s longstanding practice of placing liens on the homes of recipients of cash assistance offered through welfare.

Critics say this process pre-dates the welfare reforms Connecticut and many other states enacted in the 1990s, when new rules were established to limit fraud and to require recipients with addiction problems to seek assistance. 

Connecticut’s statute is an outdated, unnecessary measure that stops many of those it’s trying to help from building wealth, according to House Speaker Matt Ritter, D-Hartford, and Rep. Toni E. Walker, D-New Haven, who spearheaded the repeal effort.

Legislative leaders still hadn’t decided late Tuesday whether to include a fourth fiscal component to the bill scheduled to go before the House on Wednesday.

The Lamont administration is seeking to waive sales taxes for up to 30 years on data centers that invest at least $400 million in a facility in Connecticut — or at least $200 million if the facility is located in an “enterprise zone” where the state is trying to encourage development.


February 22, 2021

CT Construction Digest Tuesday February 23, 2021

Berlin planning to building new community, senior center, but plenty of questions remain

Erica Drzewiecki  BERLIN – The town is planning to build a new community and senior center sometime in the near future, but the “when” and “how” are still uncertain.

Berlin officials recently posted a link on the town’s Facebook page to the new project website. This sparked interest from local residents, who queried as to the project timeline, the possibility of a pool and more.

However, Town Manager Arosha Jayawickrema confirmed with the Herald on Monday the project was no closer to a groundbreaking due to the covid-19 pandemic.

No referendum date has been set and community information sessions are not yet in the works.

“Public outreach is still in limbo due to covid,” Jayawickrema said. “No public meetings are scheduled at this time.”

Public forums initially gaged interest in 2018, with residents expressing excitement about the possibility of a project. The town was awarded a $750,000 grant from the state in 2019, to begin a study for the new facility. Quisenberry Aracri Malik (QA+M Architecture) was enlisted in April 2020 to design the project and execute the plans.

But before the design is finalized, the price tag is set and the plans are put out for voters’ approval, a list of steps must be completed. This pre-referendum work started in May of 2020.

Four potential sites for the new building were examined by the project team, which determined Patterson Way, close to Berlin High School, to be the most viable building location.

The next steps would be to hold public information meetings, revise the designs based on feedback and finalize the concept plans before a referendum.

Town plan and zoning staff have reviewed the architect’s initial drawings and the firm is currently revising exterior plans in response to their comments.


MONDAY FEBURARY 22 BEGINS HERE FOR THOSE DID NOT RECIEVE YESTERDAY'S EMAIL 

Carrier Construction plans for commercial, residential development of large section of Centre Square

Susan Corica  BRISTOL – Carrier Construction Inc. has plans for commercial and residential development of a large section of Centre Square downtown.

The plans have grown so much that the City Council was forced to postpone till next month approving the sale of three parcels of the square because Carrier decided to acquire a fourth parcel as well.

The city’s Economic and Community Development Commission reviewed Carrier’s letter of intent earlier in the month, planning to send them on to the council for action. The letter said Carrier intended to buy Parcels 6, 7, and 8 – a total of 3.44 acres – for $172,000.

“Unfortunately, or fortunately depending on how you look at it, when we got to the meeting the Carrier Construction representatives had asked to revise their letter of intent to now also include Parcel 5,” said Mayor Ellen Zoppo-Sassu.

That means Carrier would acquire the entire remaining vacant land in Centre Square, from the northerly portion where McDonald’s is all the way down to Hope Street, then over to where the Public Works Department recently constructed a public parking lot by the railroad tracks, she said.

“So all of the paperwork and everything that we had prepared was for lots 6, 7, and 8, not 5, 6, 7, and 8,” she said, adding that the issue will now have to go through the commission’s downtown subcommittee and then to the full commission again before the council can consider it.

“But we’re very excited about this, because I think this represents what people are waiting for in terms of not just looking at an empty parking lot, but actually seeing plans and how they are going to be reviewed and then built over the next few months,” she said.

Carrier’s original plan was to build at least two mixed use buildings, with associated parking, that combined would offer 60 to 70 market rate apartments on the upper floors and 10,000 square feet of retail/office/commercial space on the ground floors, with frontage on North Main Street.

Zoppo-Sassu said Carrier does “incredible work,” citing the townhouses the company is currently building on Main Street across from the Bristol Public Library.

“If we can get that type of quality for market rate apartments across the street from City Hall and the Police Department, with some planned open space and everything else that’s happening, I think we’re going to finally get to that point where we have achieved some type of synergy for downtown,” she said.

Zoppo-Sassu said adding so many housing units to downtown would be a boost to local businesses and restaurants.

Combine that with the planned cleanup and residential renovation at the Sessions Building on Riverside Avenue, “and all of a sudden you have a downtown that’s filled with people that both are working here and living here. That’s something that we have been striving for, so it’s great to see it happen,” she said.

“And with all those people downtown they might even have an opportunity to attend something at the Rockwell Theater,” said Councilman Peter Kelley, referring to the theater being renovated at the planned Memorial Boulevard Intradistrict Arts Magnet School nearby.


Waterford moves forward with demolishing abandoned marina 

Sten Spinella  Waterford — Two abandoned docks adjacent to the condominiums on Scotch Cap Road are set to be demolished.

On Tuesday, the Board of Selectmen approved a bid from Mohawk Northeast, a construction company, to conduct the dock removals. The project represents a partnership between the state, the town and the Navy. The Navy has long wanted the remnants of the abandoned marina just past the train tracks to go because it's across from the piers where submarines dock at the base.

"We're going to start home-porting the new Virginia Class submarines at the submarine base," executive director at the state Office of Military Affairs Bob Ross said Thursday. "These are the Block V submarines that are about 80 feet longer than the previous submarines. When we want to homeport those in Groton, we have to have room to maneuver them, so the submarine base is going to have to create a larger turning basin for these submarines. And that derelict dock, marina, is in the way. That marina has never been used. It was built, but never used, so we'll be very happy to get it out of the way as a hazard to navigation."

Town Planner Abby Piersall said the docks are a part of what was going to be a sort of riverfront yacht club. That never came to fruition, as the funding ran out. In recent years there was a separation of the parcels with the condos further inland. The town foreclosed on the property due to tax delinquencies.

Piersall said the Navy reached out to Waterford about the docks even before the town took control of the property in 2018.

The state gave Waterford $525,000 in 2018 to cover the costs of the project and the back taxes that were owed on the property by the previous owners. After going out to bid to handle the project, the town found out that state money wasn't going to be enough for the prices contractors were offering.

"We worked with the state, the Navy, to modify the project scope in order to make it work with our budget," Piersall said. "The change to the project was whether we would still remove the hellicle anchors that were buried into the mud, or if we would just remove all cables and the dock system above the mudline. We're basically taking out everything above the mudline."

Ross said this type of initiative isn't uncommon, and that the Navy has a long history of collaboration with surrounding towns, including multiple projects working with municipalities around the base to resolve problems facing the Navy.

"We helped the town of Ledyard buy land on the north end of the base, outside the fence line, to make sure it doesn't get developed in a way that's incompatible with the Navy," Ross said. "We helped the town of Groton do the same thing on the south end. This is kind of the same project — we're trying to deal with encroachment mitigation, to stop encroachment that's going to interfere with the Navy operations."

Ross said he hoped the project would be complete before the year's up. Piersall didn't have an estimate for completion, but she said the town would like this to be a speedy process as well. Ross noted that the first Block V submarines are anticipated to arrive at the base in 2025.

"I think in comparison to most public sector-private sector interactions, this moved pretty quickly," Ross said. "The town of Waterford and former First Selectman Dan Steward deserve a lot of credit for recognizing how important this was and then moving it efficiently through their municipal government and process."

 The condos near the docks are situated up the hill on the Thames River. The docks are at the base of that hill, and people have to cross railroad tracks to reach the land where the docks are. The town is considering what to do with the slice of land with the docks it owns. Piersall said the property only allows for passive recreation, so in terms of possible future uses, it's either recreation or conservation.

"There have been very preliminary discussions on our ability to open that up safely to the public," Piersall said. "One of the big things we have to work out is access over the railroad tracks. That is something the town will continue to have discussions about, but that'll be the primary piece — safe pedestrian access over those tracks. Anytime publicly owned coastal property is part of the conversation, generally speaking, the goal is for us to open it up to folks as soon as we're able."


Connecticut Port Authority members seek ethics opinions

Greg Smith  New London — Members of the Connecticut Port Authority have sought opinions from the Connecticut Office of State Ethics in response to questions and a challenge issued by The Day Editorial Board about whether certain activities constitute a conflict of interest.

CPA board member John Johnson has asked for a ruling on whether his ownership of a commercial property near State Pier should prohibit him from voting on matters related to the pier. The quasi-public agency now owns and is managing the multi-million reconstruction of State Pier.

Day opinion columnist David Collins, in a recent column, argues Johnson “continues to participate in votes and discussion of State Pier while he stands to profit by industrial property he owns nearby.”

The Day Editorial Board wrote that “what happens at State Pier could have much to do with the future value of Johnson’s property and his business.”

Johnson owns a 35,000-square-foot warehouse at 75 Crystal Ave. that he purchased in 1999, prior to the formation of the Connecticut Port Authority. The assessed value is $1.4 million. Johnson said none of the businesses leasing space on his property have any connection with State Pier or Gateway, the State Pier operator. The businesses there include NorthEast Electrical, defense contractor Curtiss-Wright and Asplundh Construction.

And while Johnson said he has recused himself from board discussions in the past related to State Pier, “whether or not my property is close by… I don’t see where there is a conflict of interest.”

“I’m perfectly willing to have (the Office of State Ethics) look at it. I think it’s an accusation without a whole lot of merit. I think the CPA has been unjustifiably crucified on a lot of these issues, and it’s time this stuff stops,” Johnson said.

The Day has additionally questioned the Connecticut Port Authority about a 2018 contract with Seabury Capital, a group paid in excess of $700,000 for work that included managing the process of finding a new operator and negotiating the final contract.

The State Contracting Review Board, a group looking at CPA contracts, has raised questions about the need to hire the company, which was paid a success fee. The signing of the contract also came three months after Henry Juan III of Greenwich, a managing director with Seabury, resigned from the port authority board.

Collins has argued that the awarding of a contract with Gateway, which also runs the port of New Haven “was engineered by a venture capital firm with insider ties to the port authority.”

Connecticut Port Authority Chairman David Kooris, who was not chairman at the time the contract with Seabury was signed, said Juan was not a member of the committee that reviewed and scored RFP responses.

Juan was also not on the board when the recommendation to hire Seabury came to a vote and there is no evidence to show Juan represented the interest of Seabury before the CPA. Generally, Kooris said, a former board member could not represent their company before the board within the year after leaving.

Kooris said he has submitted information related to the Seabury contract and was advised that the Office of State Ethics does not issue advisory opinions on past actions, only on potential future actions. He said it was unclear whether the Office of State Ethics would decide to refer the issue to its enforcement division.

Both Johnson and Kooris said they await further word from the Office of State Ethics.


Spring groundbreaking set for 111-unit upscale Bloomfield apartment development

Matt Pilon  With local approvals and a branding plan in hand, developers Avner Krohn and Brian Zelman are set to break ground this spring on a 111-unit upscale apartment complex on Jolley Drive in Bloomfield.

Krohn, of New Britain’s Jasko Development, and Zelman, of West Hartford’s Zelman Real Estate, said in a recent interview that they’ve named the project The Residences at Wash Brook, after one of several nearby brooks at the 20-acre site located midway between Routes 178 and 218.

While the two partners have worked together in the past, including on a recently completed Jolley Drive medical building, Wash Brook is their first multifamily collaboration.

Fresh project renderings show a two-story atrium with a mezzanine just inside the entrance to the four-story building.

“It’s not a massive building, it has kind of a boutique hotel feel,” said Krohn, who has been one of New Britain’s more active developers in recent years.

Krohn and Zelman declined to disclose the project price tag and said it was too early to reveal asking rents. They did say Wash Brook will offer six different unit layouts at market rates, ranging from studios up to three-bedrooms.

The development is targeting young professionals and empty-nesters alike.

There will be a gym, yoga studio, pool, pet grooming stations, golf and sports simulator, bicycle storage, shared office area, covered parking ports, electric vehicle chargers, a smart door access system, and other amenities.

“I don’t think you can build 111 units that are higher end and not have those things or else your competition knocks you out,” Zelman said of the planned amenities. “It’s kind of a given that you have to have them.”

The developers applied for and received town approvals for the project last year after the COVID-19 pandemic struck Connecticut. The coronavirus had minimal impact on the project’s design, though Zelman and Krohn made sure to include nooks or other spaces inside the apartments that can be used as workstations for tenants who telecommute. They also beefed up the size of the shared business center on the ground floor.

The two hope that when units begin leasing by the summer or fall of 2022 the pandemic will be in the rearview mirror.

“It’s about a 15-month timeline from the start of construction, so we’re kind of anticipating that things will be different or, I hate to say, ‘back to normal’ when we start tenanting the building,” Zelman said.


Offshore wind a good bet for CT

Matthew Satnick and Philippe De Montigny   With the new Biden administration comes an aggressive climate plan that includes building several new offshore wind farms to help reach the country’s goal of a carbon-free electric sector by 2035.

Currently, the United States has more than 28 gigawatts of offshore wind in development. According to the Department of Energy, offshore wind has the potential to generate more than 2,000 gigawatts of clean, renewable power per year, nearly double the nation's current electricity use.

Our company, Massachusetts-based Enstructure, owns and operates a network of dry, liquid and breakbulk terminals and logistics assets on the East Coast and Inland River System of the U.S., including two right here in Connecticut – Gateway Terminal in New Haven and New London at State Pier.

We are constantly evaluating smaller, niche ports across the country as we expand our business. We have seen firsthand the challenges that many of these ports face as they struggle to compete for traditional cargo opportunities.

Offshore wind has established itself as a proven industry globally, bringing new jobs, clean energy and revitalized infrastructure to ports across Europe and Asia. As the industry continues to advance domestically, it will create tens of thousands of skilled jobs and a robust national supply chain will emerge, revitalizing ports up and down our coasts.

In Connecticut, a redeveloped State Pier will be one of these thriving ports and deliver local, regional and national economic and climate benefits. The state was an early-mover by recognizing its once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to be an epicenter for this new U.S. industry, with State Pier playing a critical role.

Make no mistake, the competition is fierce.

For example, New York recently announced a 2,500 megawatt offshore wind procurement that includes transforming the South Brooklyn Marine Terminal and the Port of Albany into large-scale offshore wind working industrial facilities.

Built more than 100 years ago, State Pier is an underutilized state asset that has been in disrepair and in need of modernization for decades.

Through a public-private partnership with Ørsted and Eversource, the companies will be covering a significant portion – $77.5 million – of the project costs for infrastructure improvements at State Pier that will transform it into a modern facility and, most importantly, give it heavy-lift capabilities.

It will serve as a premier staging and assembly port for Ørsted and Eversource’s Northeast offshore wind projects, which include Revolution Wind, a 704 megawatt project that will deliver 304 megawatts of clean energy to Connecticut and 400 megawatts to Rhode Island – enough to power nearly 350,000 homes across both states.

At the same time, State Pier will continue to support other existing long-term breakbulk operations for steel, lumber, salt and other cargoes. During Ørsted and Eversource’s 10-year lease period, we will market the facility for other cargo when it is not used for offshore wind.

On the regional level, Connecticut will benefit for decades to come from this enhanced state asset that creates jobs and provides economic development opportunities. The State Pier redevelopment project is expected to deliver more than 400 construction jobs.

The redeveloped State Pier will also serve as an asset to New England, facilitating decades of future growth long after offshore wind. Its reconfiguration significantly increases State Pier’s addressable market through its heavy-lift capabilities and enhanced footprint. Maintaining the status quo at State Pier could lead to lost opportunity and declining activity.

From a national perspective, State Pier and the wind projects it supports will spur the creation of a sustainable new industry and a significant opportunity to cut carbon emissions.

Gov. Ned Lamont and the state had the early vision to invest in New London’s infrastructure. We are eager to see the project continue to advance to ensure that Connecticut can realize the economic and environmental benefits that will come from an upgraded port facility and the offshore wind industry.


Referendum on $137 million Farmington High School plan slated for June

Dao Stacom  Hoping to overcome opposition that scuttled their plan in 2017, Farmington educators are preparing for a spring referendum on replacing Farmington High School.

Municipal officials are tentatively looking for a townwide vote June 3 on whether to tear down the high school and build a three-story replacement for $137 million.

If voters approve the idea, architects would start work this summer, construction could begin in early 2022 and wrap up in mid-2025, Finance Director Joseph Swetcky told the council last week at a meeting on Zoom.

All of that hinges on winning taxpayer support. The town council and school board are looking to bounce back from the contentious 2017 vote, when residents voted roughly 2-1 against a massive renovation plan for the existing school.

The Farmington High School Building Committee has been using Ira Yellen, a consultant with Tall Timbers Marketing, to help make its case to the public.

Yellen advised the council last week that a January survey about the project shows widespread public interest. But he also advised that 45% of the people who returned the survey were retirees while just 23% were parents, the group most likely to vote “yes” in a referendum.

“The return was low from parents, especially elementary parents,” Yellen said. “They’re not seeing that this is probably going to affect them the most.”

Yellen advised outreach efforts at the various senior living complexes around town. Traditionally retired voters on fixed incomes are likely to be deeply concerned about tax implications of a major school project, while parents of school-age students focus more on the impact on education.

Yellen mailed surveys to 11,600 households asking basic questions about the project, and 1,111 — about 9.8% — responded.

“That’s the highest I’ve seen in 20 years of doing these surveys,” Yellen told the council.

Respondents were split between the factors they felt should be the most important focus of the high school replacement.

Roughly 75% cited improving educational programming, 81% listed safety improvements and 76% mentioned remedying deficiencies at the current building.

But the factor getting the most attention — from 84% of respondents — was the cost and its impact on property taxes.

Swetcky said long-term financial projections show the town could borrow its roughly $110 million share of the cost by issuing four sets of bonds between 2022 and 2025. Taxpayers would get several years of increases in a row, but after that the debt service would level out or drop for the rest of the bonds’ 20-year term, he said.

 “The first impact would hit in 2022-23 (with) $1.2 million in debt service,” he said. “But existing debt drops off $1.1 million that year, so the impact on the tax rate is a low increase.”

Swetcky said taxes on an average home assessed at $227,000 would rise $77 in 2022-23, then $189 in 2023-24, $98 in 2024-25, $94 in 2025-26 and $8.50 in 2026-27. The project would require no further tax increases, and the bonds would be repaid by 2045, he said.

Local taxpayers would cover $110 million of the project, with state aid accounting for the other $27 million.

The Farmington High School Building Committee plans numerous public outreach efforts before any referendum, and is posting documents about the project at its website at https://fhsbuildingproject.org.


‘Looking to develop’: Demand for homes could lead to construction spike in Connecticut

Alexander Soule  As properties go, it was not going to last long on the market — a dream home on more than an acre of land in Greenwich, abutting more than three acres of conservation area and priced at a mere $1.8 million in an enclave where other houses are selling for more than $5 million.

The only element missing? The dream home itself, which exists only in the mind of the buyer who bought the acreage. But it won’t be long before a builder has that blueprint in hand, as a backhoe breaks ground on a new house.

As home hunters pounce on listings nearly as fast as sellers are putting them onto the market in Connecticut, construction of single-family homes is shaping up as the state’s next boom following a decade of apartment construction.

The last burst of new construction in Connecticut in 2008 ended up with many homes built “on spec” languishing empty for extended periods and some going into foreclosure for lack of buyers, after a hot housing market imploded in the sub-prime mortgage collapse that triggered the Great Recession.

But experts agree that the COVID-19 pandemic continues to drive city dwellers to outlying towns, as more employers embrace remote working arrangements they cobbled together on the fly last year.

The CEO of Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices New England Properties does not see a spec-building bubble like 2007 in the offing, but says there is sufficient interest in Connecticut options that newly built homes will find buyers in a hurry.

“We’re seeing more permits, for sure, and we’ll see more builders much more willing to bring their product and at a little bit higher of a price,” said Candace Adams, CEO of Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices New England Properties. “I’ve gotten ... inquiries for large parcels of land in Connecticut of people looking to develop it.”

A year after permits for apartments outnumbered new houses in Connecticut by 1,300 units, the pendulum swung in the opposite direction last year according to the U.S. Census Bureau. The more than 2,900 home permits estimated by the Census Bureau was the highest total since 2008, when municipal officials signed off on nearly 3,100 projects.

The SmartMLS multiple listing service had more than 2,500 listings for available residential lots in Connecticut, from a 19-acre waterfront spread on Greenwich’s Field Point Road priced at more than $45 million to a 33-acre wooded parcel in Stonington that sold this week for less than $1 million. Many of those lots carry approvals to be subdivided for multiple homes.

Currently in Connecticut, 1,600 newly constructed homes are listed for sale on Zillow, including 200 in the past month alone and several of those already under contract. But it is not quite yet a build-it-and-sell-it bonanza — large numbers more remain available that came on the market last summer and fall.

The Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection currently lists 1,600 home builders approved to perform new construction.

“As far as who is buying, it depends on what part of the state we’re talking about,” Jim Perras, president of the Home Builders & Remodelers Association of Connecticut, said in an email. “In central Connecticut, typically what we are seeing is customers in their 30s or 40s with children — most are second time home buyers and residents from the area. Contrast that with the Fairfield County area, where the vast majority of new home buyers are from out of state, with many existing residents opting to remodel and build additions.”

Perras said that builders are busy enough that it is squeezing out any excess capacity for speculative home construction for subsequent sale. And he said builders are getting squeezed on another front — the cost of materials.

Prices for building materials have escalated sharply the past several months including for lumber, confounding builders who are purchasing supplies after locking in prices for existing projects. The Associated General Contractors of America beseeched President Joe Biden on Thursday to intercede by finding ways to increase domestic lumber production or make it easier for suppliers to import from Canada or other countries.

But today’s buyers and builders have another extraordinary tool at their disposal — interest rates that at 2.7 percent for a 30-year mortgage are at nearly half their level of two years ago. The Federal Reserve has indicated it will hold interest rates steady for at least the next year in an effort to boost economic activity coming out of the pandemic.

In Stonington, the agent who sold the 33-acre parcel near Lord’s Point indicated that activity is booming elsewhere as well, including on Mason’s Island at the mouth of the Mystic River.

“I just sold or put under deposit about six or seven lots there,” said Judi Caracausa of Market Realty in Mystic. “Wonderful new construction happening there too.”


Getting There: Lamont’s transportation budget doesn’t add up

Jim Cameron  The Governor’s proposed biennial budget for transportation just doesn’t add up.

Thanks to reduced rail ridership, Gov. Ned Lamont’s projecting cost savings in the Connecticut Department of Transportation budget of $82 million over the next two years but promises no further cuts in service beyond those already taken during the pandemic. But how does that jibe with Metro-North parent MTA’s projected $8 billion operating deficit through 2024?

Even pre-pandemic when ridership was at record highs, Metro-North still lost money. And taxpayers made up the difference. Grumbling commuters packed in rush-hour trains paying the highest commuter rail fares in the US still couldn’t cover operating costs, let alone capital expansion.

Now, with ridership down 80 percent those deficits are exploding. And even if relief money comes from Uncle Sam, how long can near-empty trains be kept running?

As I’ve written before, I don’t think commuters will be coming back post-pandemic in anywhere near the old numbers. So if ridership remains low and the MTA sticks to its promise of no layoffs or fare hikes, something’s got to give.

Metro-North President Catherine Rinaldi says I’m wrong. She says post-COVID daily ridership will only drop 10 - 20 percent. But it’s those monthly pass holders who gave the railroad almost half of its revenue pre-COVID and their loss can never be made up by off-peak and weekend day-trippers to New York City’s attractions as she hopes.

Stay tuned for mandatory public hearings on all this, what I’ve called “political theater.” But whatever commuters may say, however they might complain, their testimony won’t make a darn bit of difference. The DOT budget won’t change. The fiscal die has been cast and come up “snake eyes.”

None of this should surprise you when you consider how the governor writes his budget. In fact, the document is not of his creation but the Office of Policy and Management.

OPM doesn’t ask the DOT “how much do you need for roads and rails?”. They tell the agency, “Here’s how much you’ll get. And here’s where to make the cuts.”

But while the Lamont budget sees “savings” through reduced rail and bus operations, it has found money for any number of highway projects while at the same time saying we need to reduce air pollution. More highways, more cars, more pollution. So much for their vaunted Transportation Climate Initiative.

Folks, it just doesn’t add up.

There are no tolls in this proposed budget. But there is a “mileage tax” on heavy trucks passing through our state. That’s fine with me as I’ve always supported user fees. But the $90 million that tax is expected to generate will do little to save the Special Transportation Fund from a deficit this year and insolvency by 2024.

In fact, that $90 million will just be used to fund issuance of more bonds to be paid off by our grandchildren. Never mind the $92 billion — yes, billion — in long term debt coming due in the next 20 years for underfunded teacher pensions and such.

Today, 40% of the DOT budget goes to paying debt service on bonds issued decades back. We can’t even pay for the decrepit transportation we have today, so our short-sighted lawmakers just kick the proverbial can down the road.

The problem is we’ve run out of road.


As the Electrical Grid Collapses in Texas, New England Takes Note

Brendan Crowley  As power grid operators restore power to the millions of Texans who have endured freezing temperatures and no heat or running water for days, experts say that it’s unlikely New England’s relatively hardy grid would fail due to cold weather.

With the caveat that much still has to be learned about the root causes of widespread power outages and skyrocketing energy prices across Texas and the Midwest, they also cautioned that electric grids are going to have to prepare for the unexpected as the changing climate makes unlikely weather a reality.

New England knows cold

Dan Dolan, president of the New England Power Generators Association, the trade group representing the region’s power producers, said the widespread power outages in Texas are a product of the state’s grid not being prepared for the extreme and prolonged temperatures that the state is experiencing.

New England, where extreme and prolonged cold is a fact of life, has a grid that can manage that weather because it’s been designed to manage it.

Early reports from the Texas grid operator, Electric Reliability Council of Texas, point to frozen equipment at natural gas wellheads and power plants that provide a majority of the power in Texas as a primary culprit for the state’s shortfall in power supply.

Natural Gas Infrastructure in New England Courtesy of the U.S. Energy Information Administration

Natural gas isn’t produced in New England, so frozen wellheads here aren’t a concern – though constraints on gas imported through pipelines do cause supply disruptions from time to time, Dolan said. That’s where having backups like reserve fuel oil is important in the winter, he said.

Texas power plants also aren’t prepared for the cold, said Susan Tierney, energy consultant for Analysis Group and a former energy and utilities official in both the U.S. and Massachusetts governments. Used to sun and warmth, a lot of equipment is outside and froze when exposed to the prolonged cold, she said.

In New England, power producers invest in winterization, Dolan said. Some of that has to do with using the right lubricants for power turbines, like using antifreeze in a car.

Interconnections and capacity market

Another key issue that has emerged in early evaluations of the power grid in Texas, is the state’s lack of connection to other grids that could have potentially provided power from as its own generators failed.

“Texas is not interconnected in a robust way to the rest of the United States, so if it’s got problems, it’s on an island having to help itself,” Tierney said.

Marcello Graziano, an associate professor and economic geographer at Southern Connecticut State University agreed that Texas has only a small ability to make up for losses of power by drawing from other grids.

New England is relatively well connected to other grids, in particular New York and Quebec. In 2020, about 20 percent of New England’s power came from other grids, largely from Quebec, Graziano said.

“That means you can rely on sources that are located elsewhere, and that is good,” Graziano said. “That means, like a diversified portfolio, if something goes bad in one sector, you can rely on something else.”

While a more integrated grid probably would have helped Texas, Graziano said, there were multiple failures at multiple levels of the system, particularly with power generators, and the issue still needs to be evaluated more closely.

Along with its connections to other grids, Dolan said that ISO-New England’s forward capacity market is another feature designed to avoid crises like the one in Texas. The capacity market provides funding to allow the major capital investments in power plants that would help ensure that they can perform in a harsh winter. The market also ensures there are enough resources available to meet the expected demand for power at peak times in the winter and summer, he said.

“There’s going to be other elements of this that come out that could show further improvements that could be made to the market to prepare for these extreme weather events,” Dolan said. “It’s too early to tie those directly, but I do think it underscores why we have some of the market structures we have, while recognizing some improvements can certainly be made.”

Planning for the unexpected in a changing climate

New England power plants and the region’s power grid are designed for cold weather, Dolan said. It’s a necessity in the frigid northeast winters, but it comes with added costs. 

“Given that this is a 50- to 100-year type of situation, it’s pretty clear that a lot of facilities in Texas were not designed for it, and the market wasn’t paying for it,” Dolan said. 

The prolonged cold across such a large portion of the middle U.S. is the product of a historically unprecedented set of conditions that has people hunkering down and relying on electricity to keep themselves warm, Tierney said. 

That means demand for power is off the charts, higher than what the grid operator planned for. At the same time that cold is causing demand to spike, it’s taken a large part of the electric supply out of commission, including frozen mechanics at gas-fired plants and frozen wind turbines – two key sources of energy for the state.

Traditionally, electric utilities have used forecasting tools that use historical data to predict future energy demand, Tierney said. As the climate changes, we’re seeing more unusual events and extreme weather that we haven’t seen in the past, she said.

“The world is changing, and it’s not like this is a surprise to anyone in this field, but I’ve asked utilities across the country, ‘How are you figuring new weather patterns and conditions into your planning and forecasting?’ and they say they haven’t yet,” Tierney said, adding that she wasn’t referring to New England utilities in particular.

Tierney said that it will be difficult to integrate climate modeling in the transmission planning process, because, while it gives some expectation of what events could occur, it doesn’t necessarily give the granular details utilities are looking for.

“Humidity and cold creates ice, and that happened in Texas – it’s a huge surprise,” Tierney said. “But it happened two years ago, too. So there have to be different risk assessments with pushing for ‘what if’ kinds of scenarios that are not necessarily based on probabilities, but on expectations that, at some point, there will be a convergence of conditions and a ‘perfect storm.’”

On Wednesday, Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Commissioner Katie Dykes said it was too early to say what the precise causes of the outages are in Texas, but said she was encouraged when federal regulators announced they would be investigating the root causes. Connecticut will be following that investigation closely to ensure New England’s grid operator is appropriately planning for extreme weather, she said. 

“I think that the one thing that is clear, if you look at any meteorologist presentation over the last day or two, is that the jetstream has collapsed,” Dykes said. “This is something that climate scientists have been telling us we have to be prepared for.”

Dolan said it’s clear the climate is changing, and we’re seeing the impacts in Texas and the midwest, as we’ve seen the impacts in New England. The issue is balancing the cost of preparing for risks with the costs of a potential disaster, and “there is never going to be a perfect mousetrap,” Dolan said.

“You can plan for the most extreme event, but that does come at a cost, and the consumer ultimately pays for that,” Dolan said.

What about those frozen wind turbines?

Initial headlines and political reaction focused on wind turbines in Texas that had been frozen and were not producing power. For opponents of a quick shift to renewable energy, it looked like one of their primary arguments had come to life – a grid too reliant on sources of energy that need specific weather conditions to produce power is at risk of major disruptions.

Throughout the week, the Texas grid operator has debunked the notion that frozen wind turbines were the primary cause of the power outages. Instead, ERCOT pointed to issues at thermal plants, including gas, coal and nuclear, which provide about 80 percent of the grid’s winter capacity.

Graziano said that, while there were renewables like wind that failed as they froze up, they are known to be weather-dependent and behaved about as expected. When a power source acts as expected, the grid operator has planned for it, so it’s not necessarily the problem because there will be backup plans in place.

“The real problem is uncertainty, and the failures you did not expect,” Graziano said. 

The unexpected failure came largely from natural gas production, ERCOT has said. For opponents of natural gas, it’s an indictment of a resource that backers say is a reliable source of energy, cleaner than coal, that is perfect to fill the gaps left by weather-dependent renewables.

Tierney said electric grids are more complicated than they’re made out to be in political debates, where the tendency is to simplify the trade-offs between different sources of energy into finger-pointing and claims that renewables or gas can’t be counted on in times of need.

Different components of the energy system have different functions, costs and benefits, Tierney said. Solar and wind projects are expensive to build compared to gas plants, but then they don’t need gas to run and aren’t subject to the kinds of price swings that Texas and the Midwest are now coping with, and that happen in New England when there are constraints on gas.

But the trade off is that renewables rely on the sun and wind to generate power. Solar can’t provide power at night, for example, unless it’s combined with battery storage, Tierney explained, but that doesn’t mean that it doesn’t have value, or can’t be part of a reliable grid.

Dolan agreed that the initial assessment shows that the crisis in Texas was caused by unexpected and extreme weather, not the shortcomings of any one particular source of power.

“This is where some caution is warranted, and we do need to do the full audit of what actually happened to draw those conclusions, but at this early stage, I think this is a weather issue,” Dolan said.