February 20, 2025

CT Construction Digest Thursday February 20, 2025

Naugatuck works to abandon part of Water Street for new train station

Andreas Yilma

NAUGATUCK — The Board of Mayor and Burgesses has voted to discontinue a portion of Water Street to make way for the proposed new train station.Ad

“We are conveying the piece at the bottom in the center that's mostly on Water Street to the state so they can build a train platform, a train station and parking,” Mayor N. Warren “Pete” Hess said.

Water Street is divided mainly by Maple Street. The section of Water Street from Trinity Health of New England Urgent Care to the Post Office recently was converted to a one-way to help with traffic. The rest of that portion of Water Street that runs past The Station Restaurant all the way to Millville Avenue and Church Street is one-way.

The side of Water Street south of Maple Street hasn't been used in the past 40 years, Hess said. 

“We're going to discontinue the town road,” Hess said. “So Water Street will be a town road on both sides of the state land but in the middle, on the state property, it'll be a state property with state access, not town access.” 

Before borough officials can convey part of the road to the state, the process has to be referred to the Planning Commission for its approval.

The state Department of Transportation was expected to open bids in the beginning of February for the construction of the train station and platform. The current train station is next to The Station Restaurant down the street at 195 Water St. 

Hess said the DOT is expected to start construction as soon as warmer weather arrives. 

The proposed train station in the middle of Parcel B is part of the transit-oriented development that will complement the residential and commercial development on the same piece of land.

Pennrose, a real estate development company from Philadelphia, and the Cloud Co. of Hartford are set to develop the land at the corner of Maple Street and Old Firehouse Road, The development is broken into three phases that cumulatively consist of three, four-story buildings with 60 units in each structure consisting of 29 one-bedroom and 31 two-bedroom units as well as 4,700 square feet of commercial space on the bottom floor.

Phase one of the project will be at the corner of Old Firehouse Road and Maple Street while phase two will be placed on the other end by Rubber Avenue. The middle of Parcel B will hold phase three. 

Pennrose Senior Developer and Parcel B project manager Karmen Cheung said they expect to break ground in spring, around the same time as DOT. 


200,000-square-foot warehouse proposed in South Windsor

Michael Puffer

AFlorida-based company is proposing a new 200,000-square-foot warehouse in South Windsor. 

Vero Beach, Florida-based Altatwo Realty Co. LLC is proposing to build the warehouse, along with associated parking, trailer spaces and a new freight rail spur on a 16-acre wooded property at 250 Rye St. 

An application was filed with South Windsor’s Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission in January. The project would require filling 2,512 square feet of wetlands and would compensate by creating 5,000 square feet of new wetland area, according to a report soil scientist Ian Cole filed, included with the application. 

The location of the proposed warehouse is a short distance from Route 5, in an area heavily developed with existing warehouses and logistics buildings. 

The new warehouse would access the site using a common driveway with an existing warehouse at 300 Rye St., which has related ownership. 

The 182,855-square-foot warehouse at 300 Rye St. houses a glass recycling center operated by Strategic Materials Inc., a company that was acquired last year by Belgium-based industrial materials mining and processing company Sibelco. 

The warehouse at 300 Rye St. is owned by Alta Realty Co., a company that, according to state records, shares its address with the limited liability company that owns 250 Rye St.  Alta Realty’s principal is The Tenny Group. 


New Haven gets $9.5M of frozen federal funds, but $20M for climate change still in limbo

 Mark Zaretsky

NEW HAVEN — About $30.5 million in already approved funds has been locked by the Trump administration's freeze on grants and programs related to climate change and diversity, officials said.Ad

That money is set to update heating systems, facilitate public housing development and provide job training for some of the city's neediest residents, officials said.

But the city received the first sign of relief when funds for a $9.5 million geothermal project beneath Union Square, including both Union Station and a proposed apartment complex the Housing Authority of New Haven wants to build on the former site of the demolished Church Street South apartments, were released around 3 p.m. Tuesday, a key official said.

"It's extremely frustrating," said state Rep. Steven Winter, D-New Haven, who also is executive director for the city Office of Climate and Sustainability.

He added it's "deeply concerning" to have the funding interrupted and worried the projects might not happen if the funding keeps getting suspended. He said the city won that money in a very competitive process. 

Winter said all of the grant funding was suspended Feb. 10.

"There's a federal restraining order from the federal district court in Providence that requires the administration to unfreeze the accounts that were frozen," Winter said.

But so far, that hasn't really happened, he said.

The only communication Winter has received so far from the federal government is a message on the federal payments portal that the status of the city's grants had changed, he said.

The main thing in limbo is a $20 million Community Change grant. Among the projects it would fund are energy enhancement projects, heating system upgrades, energy efficiency improvements and other issues "that really plague our older housing stock" in 14 of New Haven's neediest census blocks, Winter said.

It also includes a workforce development component to train residents for jobs, as well as funding for plumbing and electrical upgrades, active transportation and expanding New Haven's network of protected bike lanes, including a new one along Blatchley Avenue in Fair Haven, Winter said.

The grant also would fund a large investment in Haven's Harvest, a nonprofit that rescues food and feeds the hungry across the city, he said.

"These are all helping people with real needs, as well as help with climate change," Winter said.

The grant also would fund stormwater and tree canopy improvements to increase shade and reduce flooding in aging neighborhoods, expand the city's growing bikeshare program and expand a program to convert food scraps into compost that can be used in community gardens, he said.

Also held up until Tuesday was the $9.5 million grant for the geothermal project. But now it appears that those funds have been unfrozen, Winter said early Tuesday evening.

"It's a really groundbreaking project," he said, adding it would benefit the city's Hill neighborhood. 

Also caught in the mix is a $1 million "environmental justice" grant that would help residents in some of New Haven's neediest neighborhoods update their existing oil heating systems with heat pumps, Winter said.

After the city learned in late December that it had won the grant, the project was approved, or "obligated" on Jan. 17 by the former Biden administration. But Winter later found the money to be unavailable, learning a few days later that it had been suspended, he said.

"We are finalizing a solicitation for an engineering contract for the geothermal," he said, but that can't move forward until and unless the funds are unfrozen.

The freeze has stop much needed work in its tracks, Winter said, including creating job descriptions to bring on new staff. 

"We really can't move forward with those preparatory steps unless we have confirmation that we can move forward," he said.

The city's statutory partner in the Community Change grant, the Greater Dwight Development Corp., which would lead the housing and workforce development portions of the grant, also is left waiting and wondering what might happen, said Linda Townsend Maier, the GDDC's executive director.

"We're waiting and we're hoping," Townsend Maier said. "The city ... or Steve did a very good job to make sure that that was the reality ... getting input from all the neighborhoods." 

But right now, "We're pretty much in the same position we were in before we applied," Townsend Maier said.

Mayor Justin Elicker said the money was awarded to the city and so legally obligated. 

"We expect the federal government to meet their obligations, and we’re going to do everything we can and must to ensure this happens," he said. "These grants are critical to advancing important infrastructure projects and initiatives for the city-at-large, specific neighborhoods and individual residents." 

He said the freeze has affected New Haven's efforts to address climate change, as well as the daily work of city and state governments throughout the U.S.

"It also just represents backwards thinking," he said. "The United States should be leading on green technology and jobs. That’s the future. Trump can slow it down, but he can’t stop it – and if the United States doesn’t lead, other countries will."

While it would be much harder for the city to reach its climate goals without federal leadership and support, he said New Haven is committed. 

"New Haven will continue to stay true to our values, follow the science and lead the way on climate,” Elicker said.


‘55-and-older’ community proposed in South Windsor

Michael Puffer

AVernon builder is proposing an age-restricted housing development in South Windsor that would include 44 single-family houses and three duplexes.

Kenneth J. Boynton, president of Boynton Construction, in January applied to the town’s Planning and Zoning Commission for a zoning exemption and site plan approval for his “Orchard Pointe” senior residence development at 186 Foster St. The development would be restricted to owners ages 55 and above.

Boynton said he plans to build quality homes for people looking to downsize from larger properties. He hopes to gain approval in time to begin building the first demonstration home this spring and then will build as units sell.

“We are trying to build an active adult community …,” Boynton said Wednesday. “There is a really big need for this type of housing.”

Boynton purchased the 16.8-acre property for $850,000 last year. It consists mainly of agricultural fields with a wooded portion on its eastern edge. The site abuts houses to the north and the working Foster Farm to its south.

The property was transferred to Orchard Pointe Developers LLC, which has Boynton as its principal, in January.

The town’s Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission signed off on the plan on Feb. 5. It is tentatively scheduled to go before the Planning and Zoning Commission on Feb. 25.

The development would be a planned community with underlying land, roadways, common areas and a community building owned by a homeowners association, according to Boynton’s application. It would also be served by public sewer and water.

Dwelling units in the community would range from 1,550 to 2,400 square feet. An existing barn would be converted into a pickleball court and community room. Eight units would be deed-restricted to affordable prices.

Boynton said he does not yet have a price schedule for the homes. These could vary based on construction costs. He said the aim is to keep them affordable to the community. 


February 19, 2025

CT Construction Digest Wednesday February 19, 2025

Removal of Exit 21 from I-84 East in Waterbury pushed back as Mixmaster project faces delay

Paul Hughes

WATERBURY — The design phase for the first project of the "New Mix" program to reconstruct the network of bridges and elevated ramps of the so-called Mixmaster interchange of Interstate 84 and Route 8 is nearing completion.

The designs for the removal of the Exit 21 off-ramp from I-84 eastbound and related work are 90% complete, and the state Department of Transportation expects to advertise the construction contract in the final quarter of 2025, DOT spokesperson Josh Morgan said.

The DOT had initially anticipated construction to commence in 2025, but the start of work has been delayed a year as state transportation officials consulted Waterbury officials, city residents and other stakeholders on incorporating community, economic and environmental goals into the project planning.

"We're not going to start construction until sometime in 2026," Morgan said.

He said the DOT expects completion of the Exit 21 project will take two construction seasons to complete.

The New Mix is the DOT's long-term project to reconstruct and modernize the Mixmaster interchange following the completion last year of a two-year, $223.7 million rehabilitation project to extend its service life 25 years. The junction of I-84 and Route 8 got its nickname because it is a complex maze of elevated highway ramps and bridges.

When the Mixmaster opened in 1968, the interchange was considered innovative because the stacked bridges allowed the crossroads of I-84 and Route 8 over the Naugatuck River to be constructed in a smaller footprint. It originally had a life span of 50 years.

The Mixmaster was designed to accommodate approximately 100,000 motor vehicle trips a day, but that number has nearly doubled to 190,000 vehicle trips per day. By 2045, the DOT is expecting the number of daily trips to approach 225,000. The wear and tear from all that use required multiple major rehabilitation projects over the years.

Workers replaced decks on 21 spans on Route 8 southbound, and 36 spans on Route northbound, which also included a temporary bypass and U-turn. Major structural repairs consisted of strengthening the girders, columns and beams to address fatigue and corrosion. Work on I-84 eastbound and westbound included deck patching, paving and joint installation, steel repairs and strengthening, painting and substructure repairs and the installation of sign support structures.

The DOT has determined that continued rehabilitation will be unable to prolong the Mixmaster's structural lifespan and to address operational and safety standards that have evolved since the interchange was originally designed and constructed in the 1960s, including sight distance, sharpness of curves, lane alignment, standard shoulders, spacing of interchanges, and left-hand entrances and exits. Planning for the safe maintenance of traffic flow during replacement also presents engineering challenges.

Through the New Mix program, the DOT proposes to create a long-term plan for improving the safety and functionality of the interchange, reducing the amount of time commuters spend stuck in traffic, complementing Waterbury's economic and community goals, and serving the state's transportation needs for decades.

The DOT effort involves analyzing and weighing various rehabilitation and replacement options to develop actionable, phased plan. Transportation officials envision developing a mix of near-term, intermediate and long-term projects.

The removal of the Exit 21 off-ramp from I-84 eastbound was the first project to be selected. Its purpose is to improve safety, traffic operations, and air quality by reducing congestion on I-84 Eastbound in the vicinity of Exits 19 through 22. It is also intended to improve traffic conditions on city streets.

The latest plans call for the Exit 21 off-ramp form eastbound I-84 to be removed and the auxiliary lane will be extended to allow more merge and diverge distance for drivers entering and existing I-84 in the vicinity of Exit 22. The on-ramp from I-84 eastbound from Meadow Street will remain open. The Exit 22 off-ramp will be repainted to two lanes to accommodate the anticipated increase in traffic due to the removal of the Exit 21 off-ramp.

Plans for the local road network include new traffic signals with improved signal timing and phasing and street and urban design improvements to benefit pedestrians and bicyclists, including possibly installing ADA-compliant crosswalks, new sidewalks, decorative plantings, and signage to help help people find destinations in the city.

The DOT said benefits of the Exit 21 project include reduced travel times on I-84 eastbound in the vicinity of exits 19 to 22, improved safety, reduced congestion and improved air quality, greater safety for bicyclists and pedestrians on city streets, and a more welcoming environment.


Dan Haar: Tolls making a comeback in CT? Not soon — but pressure will build under Trump

Dan Haar

It has been one of the few moments of levity for the deep-blue state of Connecticut steering its way through Trump's America. 

Gov. Ned Lamont, whose 2019 tolls plan amounted to a high-speed tire blowout at the start of his first term, declared a new champion of tolls: President Donald Trump. 

Lamont, in his Feb. 5 budget speech to lawmakers, described a memo from the U.S. Department of Transportation, "notifying us that all road and bridge grant making will be subject to some revised economic principles."

The federal department will give priority to states with "user-pay models," Lamont told the Capitol crowd. "AKA tolls. You can't make this stuff up."

The yucks included Lamont and the rest of us making fun of the ridiculous U.S. DOT policy favoring states with "marriage and birth rates higher than the national average," as the Jan. 29 memo from Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy does clearly say. Connecticut, as most of us know, falls short on those two activities. 

"So my children, hurry up and get married, go forth and procreate, and your community may get a new bridge," Lamont quipped. 

We do have baby bonds for low-income families but we're not going to set up marriage booths on the Berlin Turnpike just to pull in a few hundred million bucks from the feds for highway work. 

How about tolls? Would we do it, really?

We remain the last state touching the Atlantic Ocean without electronic levies for passenger vehicles on any of our highways. The idea always made sense financially, as well over half the dollars collected in this small state would come from out-of-state travelers. 

We're flush with cash now and don't need the extra revenue. But as Garrett Eucalitto, Lamont's transportation commissioner, told me Tuesday, that won't last many more years. Besides, we're diverting enormous sums from the state sales tax — $879 million this year — to shore up the state transportation fund.

And now, if Trump and his transportation chief dangle huge rewards for setting up "user-pay models," or worse, take away money if we don't set up tolls, would we? Could we?

Not anytime soon. "Been there, done that," Lamont told me Tuesday. I pressed. "No," he replied. 

'That's tolls, isn't it?'

How about in a few years? Eucalitto, a strong supporter of user fees in transportation systems, weighed in. "Short-term, I don’t think anyone wants to have the conversation," he said. "Long-term, everything has to be on the table."

Of course, user fees can mean a lot of things. Lamont, one of two Democratic governors who attended Trump's inauguration last month, sees an inconsistency in the Republican U.S. president fighting the new, $9 levy for cars crossing into midtown or downtown Manhattan.

"It’s ironic, he’s going after Kathy Hochul in New York for congestion pricing. That’s tolls, isn’t it?" Lamont asked, referring to Gov. Hochul, the force behind Manhattan congestion pricing. 

The U.S. DOT has issued no further public guidance on what it meant in the Jan. 29 memos and in fact, Connecticut never even received those notices directly. 

Whatever the feds intend, we can forgive Lamont for rearing back at the idea of another tolls battle. He rolled out an ambitious plan just weeks after taking office six years ago. He battled hard all that spring in the legislature and amended the details a couple of times. 

But with every Republican opposed and Democrats not in the mood to raise an unpopular tax, the levy never came to a vote. Lamont's approval rating dipped below the Mendoza line of 30 percent.

He tried again briefly in early 2020. That died even before COVID-19 hit. Then Lamont performed masterfully in the pandemic and has been one of the nation's most popular governors ever since. 

The money will not add up

Okay, so a Lamont-led tolls redux isn't happening. Still, as Eucalitto explained, the numbers say we will have to do something in a few years, if not sooner. Here's how the numbers shake out:

Connecticut's 5-year capital plan for state roads, highways, transit systems and facilities such as train stations totals $16.3 billion. Under a guaranteed formula, the Feds have supplied $1.1 billion a year under the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, a signature achievement of former President Joe Biden, up from a bit more than $700 million a year. 

That landmark act also sent $2 billion of matching money to Connecticut in competitive grants for projects such as the Gold Star Bridge in New London-Groton, the Walk Bridge for trains over the Norwalk River, that mess of an interchange in Meriden and more goodies. 

"We have over 50 electric buses in the system right now," Eucalitto told me, in Stamford, New Haven and at UConn. 

For the rest and for some regular operations, Connecticut relies on gasoline taxes for about $850 million a year; the sales tax transfer; and assorted other taxes and fees. All the federal money helped, as did a paydown of some debt, which reduced payments.

"It staved off the state having to address transportation funding for a few more years," Eucalitto said. 

How about more grant money from the $100 million up for grabs in the federal infrastructure bill? Not likely. "We set a target of getting 1 percent of those grants and we’ve blown past that," the commissioner told me. 

If anything, Connecticut could lose money under the formula payouts. A second memo from Duffy, the U.S. secretary, makes it clear that Trump wants to see "local compliance or cooperation with immigration enforcement," along with elimination of all references to climate change, greenhouse gases, gender identity, racial equity, environmental justice and diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) goals.

'It’s going to be brought up again'

The governor in 2027, whether it's Lamont's third term (he'll announce a decision on running in the late spring) or someone else, will need to deal with depleting transportation money.

Eucalitto, as president of the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials, is in constant dialogue with his counterparts and spoke with Duffy at an event earlier this month about ways to pay for highways and mass transit. 

"I definitely think it’s going to be brought up again," Eucalitto said of tolls. "The governors and legislatures have had this discussion over the last decade. ... I’m a firm believer in the user fee model, where if you use a system, you should pay for it."

Based on his talk with Duffy, Eucalitto believes we're safe on the baseline formula. "That’s been a bedrock for well over 100 years," he told me. Bedrock? I uttered two words: "birthright citizenship."

The point is, one way or another we'll need to reckon with some way to pay for transportation. Tolls make the most sense but, in another irony, Connecticut Republicans have opposed them mightily even though the GOP in other states welcomes highway charges. "It doesn’t always make sense," Eucalitto said. 

Former House Speaker Joe Aresimowicz was in office during the tolls debate of 2019 and earlier under former Gov. Dannel P. Malloy. He was a skeptic at first but the numbers persuaded him we had no choice. 

"I haven't changed my opinion on tolls," Aresimowicz, now a lobbyist, told me Tuesday. 

We're in the minority in Connecticut. But that might change in 2027.


Construction of Danbury rehab hospital 6 months behind schedule due to 'extenuating circumstances'

Michael Gagne

DANBURY — A new rehab hospital that planned to open this spring on the city’s west side has requested a six-month extension due to what it called “extenuating circumstances not entirely within” its control that pushed back the project’s expected construction completion date.

Encompass Health is building the 40-bed, $39 million facility, the greater Danbury region's first rehabilitation hospital, on a 13-acre site located in the Reserve, near the New York border. The hospital stated in a Jan. 28 application to the state Office of Health Strategy that the extension of time was needed because the project required “extensive sitework” before construction could begin on the building itself.

The extensive sitework “included several months of clearing, blasting, cutting, and constructing a retaining wall on the eastern side of the property,” the hospital’s application stated. “... [C]onstruction has progressed considerably over the course of the last seven months. Absent any unanticipated delays, the Applicant expects to complete construction of the Rehab Hospital in August of 2025 and admit its first patient in September of 2025.”

The current deadline on the Certificate of Need that was originally granted by OHS is April 19. The extension would push that deadline back to Oct. 19.

Encompass’s application stated that the hospital “has worked diligently to complete the project.”

“However, with a project of this magnitude, the processes of design, permitting, and construction take a considerable amount of time and are extenuating circumstances not entirely within the Applicant’s control,” the application stated. “As a result, the Applicant requires a modest amount of additional time to complete construction, secure a license from the Department of Public Health, and begin admitting patients.”

OHS issued a public notice on Feb. 3 that it will take action on the extension request following a 30-day period, until March 5, for public comment. The notification said OHS would hold a public hearing on the request if three or more individuals or an individual representing an entity of five or more people submit a request for such a hearing.

OHS originally approved Encompass’s Certificate of Need application in April 2023, nearly three years after the hospital submitted its application. Encompass purchased the 13-acre Reserve property in March 2023. The city gave the project a local approval in 2021. 

“Purchase of the real property prior to the issuance of a CON, at the Applicant’s expense and risk, was necessary so that the ability to acquire the property was not lost due to a protracted CON process,” Encompass’s latest application stated. 

Encompass needed to design the project and obtain land use and other approvals and permits from Danbury before construction could begin. 

“All such permits were received by late May of 2024, and sitework commenced in early June of 2024,” Encompass said. 

Encompass’s application stated it “has spent considerable time, money, and other resources to move this project forward. The Applicant remains fully committed to completing the Rehab Hospital and bringing this level of inpatient rehabilitation care to the State of Connecticut in a freestanding setting. The Applicant continues to take concrete and measurable steps towards project completion and is confident in its ability to open the Rehab Hospital by September of 2025.” 

According to previous reports, the rehabilitation facility would serve people who have suffered strokes, heart attacks, and neurological ailments by providing physical rehabilitation, occupational therapy, and speech therapy.


Kathy Hochul does apparent about-face on natural gas as NYC utility signals major rate hikes

Charles Creitz

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul has approved permits to expand capacity on a major bi-state pipeline despite years of pushing green policies like bans on natural gas use in new construction.

The Hochul administration signed off on permits to expand capacity in the Iroquois Pipeline – a crucial 414-mile route from St. Lawrence County -- near the border with Cornwall, Ontario, – running down the Adirondacks, through western Connecticut, under Long Island Sound and forking toward Commack, Long Island, or Hunts Point, Bronx.

That move comes as the state Department of Environmental Conservation admitted the approvals are "inconsistent with" statewide greenhouse gas emissions limits imposed in recent years, according to the New York Post.

Hochul said this week that just as she is trying to institute $500 "inflation refunds" for middle-to-low income families, that money is going "right out the door" to Consolidated Edison (ConED). 

ConEd, the main utility provider in New York City and the Hudson Valley, is planning to implement 11.5% increases in electric rates and 13% increases in gas rates – amounting to about $500 per year – unless the New York Public Service Commission (PSC) steps in, according to FOX-5.

The PSC is already under pressure from Hochul to audit the salaries of ConED executives amid chatter about the rate hikes. Hochul’s actions come after years of crackdowns on fossil fuel production and consumption by New York Democrats.

In 2019, then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed the Climate Leadership & Community Protection Act from then-Sen. Todd Kaminsky, D-Long Beach, which moved the state away from fossil fuels and established a net-zero goal by 2040.

Two years later, the state shuttered the massive Indian Point nuclear energy production facility on the Hudson River opposite Haverstraw.

Cuomo said at the time that he had been concerned for years about the safety of the plant. "It does not belong on the Hudson River and in close proximity to the most densely populated area in the country... This is a victory for the health and safety of New Yorkers, and moves us a big step closer to reaching our aggressive clean energy goals."

Albany Democrats, led by Hochul, have since banned furnaces and gas heating in new construction.

The governor also announced a "cap and invest" program to force Big Oil to invest in green energy by paying for emissions. According to the Post, a report from the PSC also indicated ConED and fellow utility National Grid were also "barely able to provide adequate [energy] supply" during a recent Arctic storm that brought temperatures near 0 degrees Fahrenheit to the Empire State.

As for Hochul’s efforts to audit ConED, Republicans agreed the rate hikes are and have been outrageous, but that particular move would not help.

"Natural gas is a proven, reliable source of energy and vital for consumers in the Northeast," said State Assembly Minority Leader Will Barclay. "The green dreams of environmental extremists are meaningless if people can’t heat their homes in mid-February. It’s incredible to see radical liberals protest a necessary measure that allows New Yorkers to stay warm in the winter. But reliability, affordability, and common sense have never been priorities of New York’s climate cult."

State Senate Minority Leader Rob Ortt, R-Niagara Falls, added the news proves Hochul's policies are not practical.

"Their slogan is ‘Do as we say, not as we do’," he said. "Unfortunately New Yorkers don’t have the same luxury as the governor when it comes to ignoring these ridiculous laws.  Instead they are leaving our once great state. We need new energy policies and that will only happen with a new governor."

Additionally, the state’s natural-gas-rich Southern Tier – a 200-mile area roughly running from Jamestown to Hancock along the Pennsylvania border – has been affected by a statewide ban on fracking, which state lawmakers representing the area have fought yet-unsuccessfully to undo.

This, even as communities just a few miles southward in Pennsylvania continue to extract natural gas from the same Marcellus Shale Range on their side of the line.

Hochul added to the ban by further prohibiting a new, safer form of fracking using carbon dioxide instead of liquids.

While former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf enacted a moratorium on state parkland fracking, there has been no fracking activity to speak of along the NY-17 corridor for many years.

After then-Gov. David Paterson announced the state’s original fracking moratorium in 2008 – later becoming an outright ban under Cuomo – some Southern Tier villages whose economies depended on energy production considered trying to "secede" to Pennsylvania.

Fox News Digital reached out to Hochul for comment but did not receive a response by press time. 

In comments to Fox News Digital, a ConED spokesman said the approval of Hochul's permits are a "step toward enhancing the reliability of our gas supply from interstate pipelines to help us meet the energy needs of our 1.1 million gas customers, even as they choose cleaner technologies for heating."

"Con Edison has a responsibility to continue to safely and efficiently deliver the nation’s most reliable power while complying with state laws and regulations. That means investing to keep our grid resilient in the face of increasingly severe weather, supporting the state’s clean energy goals, and supporting the workforce we need to conduct ongoing maintenance and swiftly respond to customer service calls."

As for calls to audit ConED's executive salaries and more, the spokesman said the PSC regularly checks their books and the utility always cooperates.

"Con Edison operates one of the most complex energy systems in the world and that requires hiring and retaining a management workforce at the highest caliber to drive our nation-leading reliability and deliver on New York’s clean energy goals," the spokesman said.

"We benchmark our executive salaries with other utilities and general industries in the metropolitan area. Our compensation structure ties management pay to performance on several metrics, including safety, reliability and customer experience."


February 18, 2025

CT Construction Digest Tuesday February 18, 2025

High Upgrade Costs Threaten Solar Project in Windham

Francisco Uranga

WINDHAM — The developer of a solar project at a former Windham landfill is threatening to scrap the project after discovering that required substation upgrades would cost 13 times more than the project itself.

Verogy CEO William Herchel told CT Examiner that the company predicted a $2 million investment in the project. But Eversource, the electric company serving Windham, determined that substation upgrades would cost $26 million.

“Eversource understood that it would effectively stop or shutter the potential for that deal to come to fruition,” he said. “This is the largest cost I’ve ever seen for a distribution-level project.”

The problem lies in Connecticut rules that require developers to pay the full upgrade cost to enable interconnection. Developers, utilities, regulators and consumer advocates have warned that this model could stall the expansion of distributed solar generation in the state, considered key to achieving a zero-carbon grid by 2040. 

Rule changes are still being debated, with parties divided on how to share the costs between generators and ratepayers.

Verogy’s project in Windham — selected in February 2024 as part of the state’s Non-Residential Energy Solutions, which provides tariffs to compensate solar generators — is a relatively small one, meant to supply the town hall and other municipal facilities. The project boasts a $161.74 per megawatt-hour price tag — 50% more than Eversource’s standard service supply rate for small businesses. The costs would be transferred to all Eversource ratepayers through the public benefits component of the bill.

Herchel said Verogy would most likely withdraw its application and wait either until the rules were changed or someone else paid for the upgrade. 

Alternatively, the utility can choose to invest the money and pass the cost to ratepayers through a PURA-approved rate case. But Herchel said this process can take years, encouraging delays and slowing necessary upgrades for solar expansion.

“If that were to be the solution, then no distributed generation is being put on the grid,” he said. “Windham is not going to be a beneficiary of this individual project in the timeframe that they want and 100% of the upgrade costs pertaining to that substation will be borne by the ratepayers, which is not an ideal outcome.”

Andrew Belden, Eversource vice president of solar programs, told CT Examiner that the infrastructure limits were a consequence of the rapid increase in solar projects connecting to the distribution grid. 

Connecticut has expanded its solar capacity over the past decade. Last December, the state produced almost 1.3 gigawatts of power from more than 100,000 small solar farms, according to data from ISO-New England. It is equivalent to about 65% of the Millstone plant’s nuclear energy output.

New cost-sharing mechanism

In mid-January, PURA published a draft decision proposing a third option for sharing infrastructure upgrade costs, called the group study process. 

This model lets solar generators like Verogy share costs. Each pays a fee based on kilowatt capacity, covering part of the expense. Future generators and utility customers would cover the rest through rate cases.

Not all stakeholders were supportive of the proposal.

Eversource and United Illuminating criticized the proposal in a joint comment to PURA, arguing that it left utilities as the “bank” for financing grid improvements, forcing them to wait years to be reimbursed for investments “compelled by the state’s policy goals.” The utilities requested a special annual mechanism to recover the costs without going through the rate case process.

Rate cases have been a source of tension between utilities and regulators since Marissa Gillett became PURA chair in 2019. Utility companies say her changes hurt their credit ratings, while supporters say she’s just holding them accountable. The companies also said that uncertainty about when and how much they would recover in costs discourages investments to expand solar infrastructure in the state. 

Verogy has asked for a $500 per kilowatt cap on interconnection fees to provide cost certainty for developers and promote solar energy expansion — the same limit Massachusetts adopted when facing a similar issue.

“The reason they’re able to impose that cap is that they were looking forward, beyond just a group of projects that are submitted today, and understand that there will be more to come in and pay over time,” Herchel said, noting the growing demand for heat pumps and electric vehicle chargers.

In May 2024, PURA proposed limiting ratepayers’ share of infrastructure upgrade costs to 25%, with generators covering the rest. In August, it also proposed an annual cost-recovery mechanism that charges ratepayers for upgrade costs each year, instead of relying on rate cases, which are reviewed every four years.

This year’s draft decision removed both proposals.

Consumer Counsel Claire Coleman told CT Examiner she considered the draft decision a good proposal, despite the elimination of the cap on how much ratepayers could be charged for infrastructure upgrades. 

“We have suggested various protections for customers to make sure that they are not incurring any more risk or cost than we can directly attribute to the benefits they’re receiving,” she said. “Some consumer protections we advocated for along the way have been adopted.”

Thomas Wiehl, legal and regulatory director of the Office of Consumer Counsel, said the agency opposed the special annual cost recovery mechanism because of the risk of unfairly charging ratepayers for infrastructure upgrades. 

Wiehl said the infrastructure upgrade cost could be recovered in a rate case just like other capital investments. The Office of Consumer Counsel also recommended creating a new rate class for solar generators to allocate costs to them on an ongoing basis.

“We have a process to do this in a rate case,” Wiehl said. “We recommend using the tools that we have.”

PURA postponed its decision until Feb. 19.


Osten backing economic study of area served by Mohegan-Pequot Bridge

Brian Hallenbeck

State Sen. Cathy Osten, D-Sprague, has said she will continue to advocate for a bill calling for an economic study of the area surrounding the Mohegan-Pequot Bridge despite the public-hearing testimony of two state commissioners who suggested last week that a pending transportation study should come first.

Daniel O'Keefe and Garrett Eucalitto, commissioners of the Departments of Economic and Community Development and Transportation, respectively, told the legislature’s Transportation Committee that the DOT is embarking on a “transportation corridor study” in the same geographic region described in Senate Bill 1081.

“DECD would encourage the committee to await the results of that (DOT) study to inform decision making around the Mohegan-Pequot Bridge capacity,” O’Keefe wrote in testimony filed in connection with the Feb. 10 public hearing.

“I’m not willing to stop the bill from moving forward,” Osten, a Transportation Committee member, said Monday. “They’re hiring consultants to look at economics and traffic projects. My intent is to still have that bill come out of committee to make sure it (an economic study) happens. ... Let’s make sure it happens.”

The bill's 10 co-sponsors include Osten and eight other members of the southeastern Connecticut delegation.

It would require O'Keefe and Eucalitto to jointly conduct or commission an economic study of areas in Montville and Preston to determine whether the capacity of the Mohegan-Pequot Bridge adequately serves them. The proposed study would assess whether the bridge “permits the convenient, safe and expeditious flow of traffic” to the areas and the extent to which the bridge’s capacity will be affected by developments on the Mashantucket Pequot reservation and elsewhere.

Great Wolf Lodge at Mashantucket, a $300 million indoor waterpark resort set to open in May adjacent to Foxwoods Resort Casino and the Mohegan Tribe’s proposed Preston Riverwalk project are among those developments, as is an expansion of the Preston incinerator site.

“The area is a true asset, and it is imperative that we ensure that our infrastructure is sufficiently up to the task of dealing with the various projects and developments in the area,” Osten said in her public hearing testimony.

Senate Bill 1081 also seeks an evaluation of the impact on the Mohegan-Pequot Bridge of oversized loads that could be prohibited from traversing the Gold Star Memorial Bridge between Groton and New London. Traffic could be similarly diverted in the event of a public safety incident that caused the DOT to shut down the Gold Star, according to the bill.

Meanwhile, the DOT is planning to undertake a $32.8 million renovation of the Mohegan-Pequot Bridge. Local officials and residents have expressed opinions about the plan, with some saying the improvements to the bridge should include widening it from two to four lanes.

Such an undertaking would be six to seven times costlier than repairs, according to estimates.


Danbury streetscape project gets boost with a $4 million state grant: 'An incredible win'

Michael Gagne

DANBURY — City leaders’ ongoing plans to improve downtown’s walkability, appearance and economic viability received a recent boost with a $4 million state grant. 

The new funds will support the $17 million Streetscape Renaissance Project, which calls for redesigned sidewalks and roadway improvements as well as other enhancements like landscape improvements in areas like the intersection of Main, West and Liberty streets. In addition to new sidewalks, the city could see landscape improvements like new tree plantings to replace aging trees whose root systems are lifting and damaging sidewalks.

The new funding towards the effort comes from the state’s Local Transportation Capital Improvement Program, or LOTCIP. Such funds support municipal projects including streetscapes, sidewalks, pedestrian bridges, and traffic improvements. Danbury received its share through the Western Connecticut Council of Governments and the state Department of Transportation.

Mayor Roberto Alves hailed the new grant as “an incredible win for Danbury.” The grant comes as leaders pursue similar funds to complete the project.

“We are going to get it done in pieces. We are not going to take this from our general fund. That’s why we are partnering with WestCOG. It’s an incredible win for Danbury,” Alves said. 

Leaders are pursuing other state funds to ensure the streetscape project is fully funded. The city has a pending application seeking Connecticut Community Investment Fund monies.

“We are chasing money specifically designed for streetscapes,” Alves said.

City leaders hope the proposed improvements will yield long-term benefits.

A recent news release said that upgrades to downtown sidewalks, as well as lighting and roadway improvements, are ways that Danbury leaders “can better show investors, developers, current property owners and residents that we’re invested in our community.”

Alves said the city is now in the process of identifying trees to be removed and replaced with younger trees. 

The pursuit of new funding to continue the streetscape project dovetails with other efforts to transform downtown, like overhauling its downtown regulations. The Zoning Commission recently voted to support new regulations that doubles the downtown zone, and reduces height and parking restrictions.

Meanwhile, the city has also signed off on a downtown sewer capacity study. Alves said the capacity has gotten to a point where stormwater infiltration needs to be studied and where the system has stress points.

Alves said his administration will pursue grant funds to complete the study, just like it is with the sidewalk project.

Alves painted a vision to create a “vibrant, walkable Main Street,” informed largely by his ongoing conversations with downtown business owners, downtown leaders and with residents and patrons. 

The mayor said he wants to see more activity downtown. However, a complaint his administration has heard repeatedly from constituents is that downtown is lacking in amenities like parking.

Alves said his administration arrived at a simple solution toward that particular issue: improving signage directing downtown visitors to parking.

“We knew there was an opportunity there, with two parking garages,” Alves said. “We said, ‘Let’s work on signage.’ And we did that.”

Downtown is seeing some incremental growth and increased activity.

Alves cited Danbury Ice Arena’s new Spice City FC indoor soccer team as an example of a new attraction that could help downtown increase its viability. The team has gotten off to a promising start as a new family attraction. His hope is that the patrons coming downtown to see that team play as well as the Danbury Hat Tricks hockey team translate to more customers patronizing downtown businesses. Another upcoming attraction slated for downtown is the Danbury Diesel arena football team.

Alves is also hopeful that Ives Bank’s new downtown headquarters, now under construction, will draw in pedestrian traffic. 

“There will be foot traffic. We want to see restaurant traffic,” Alves said. 


February 14, 2025

CT Construction Digest Friday February 14, 2025

Decision on Ledyard quarry plan tabled to next week

Lee Howard

Ledyard — The Planning and Zoning Commission tabled a vote Thursday on a proposed 40-acre quarry off Route 12 in Gales Ferry that residents have said would ruin their health, disturb their neighborhoods and reduce the value of their homes.

The commission is next scheduled to meet to discuss and possibly vote on the application Thursday, Feb. 20 at 6 p.m. in the Town Hall Annex.

Commission members had expressed skepticism during a series of meetings over the past two months about the quarry application submitted by Gales Ferry Intermodal LLC, a division of Cashman Dredging & Marine Contracting Co. of Quincy, Mass., for a site that once housed a Dow Chemical plant. The company is seeking a special permit that would allow it to blast away large portions of Mount Decatur, where a War of 1812 fort once stood and which GFI promised to protect and help place on the National Register of Historic Places.

Commissioners agreed early during Thursday's meeting that Gales Gerry Intermodal had not proved that dust from the quarry operation could be kept within the the GFI property boundary, and therefore the application would not adhere to town regulations.

"We're not satisfied because of fugitive dust," Chairman Marty Wood said. "Commissioners felt that there will be some phantom dust that will get away."

"All they can do is to try to minimize dust," added Commissioner James Harwood. "It's going to impact adjacent properties as well as properties across the street."

Concerning vibrations from blasting during the quarrying process, Harwood said the initial blasts 150 feet up on the hill might not be an issue, but later blasting at ground level likely would create more severe impacts.

Commissioner Howard Craig said he was concerned that vibrations would create a nuisance and that they would be transmitted beyond the boundaries of the property, both of which would violate town regulations.

Planning Director Liz Burdick offered a long explanation of how GFI planned to handle the problem of silica dust. Toward the end of her presentation, a member of the audience said "People die," to which Burdick complained that she couldn't hear because of the interruption. Wood asked audience members not to speak out, and the conversation continued.

"When you blast silica you get a lot of little tiny pieces," Harwood said. "If you breathe this in, they're very sharp ... it's not like breathing normal dust."

One of the major controversies the commission had to decide Thursday was whether the quarry application fit the definition of "excavation major" under the town's zoning regulations. Burdick, who was brought on in the middle of the quarry controversy after Mayor Fred Allyn III fired previous planner Juliet Hodge, offered her opinion that the application did fit within the definition, but commission members were initially skeptical. After much back and forth with Burdick, however, the commission decided that it wouldn't cite this as a reason for denial.

Another major issue brought up at previous hearings was concern over property values. Commission members previously had discussed expert testimony and decided that home values might not lose value after the quarry project is completed in about 10 years, but they were sure people who needed to sell during the blasting and rock-hauling process would almost assuredly be facing lower home values.

Commissioners Beth Ribe and Matt Miello previously said they worried about blasting and the likelihood of litigation from homeowners if damage occurred. Ribe was particularly concerned with the intensity and duration of the proposed quarry operation, and Miello said property values most assuredly would be affected.

In other business, the P&Z heard a brief presentation about a proposed 12-unit elderly housing development in the back of the former Ledyard Center School at 740 Col. Ledyard Highway. The age-restricted development would be part of a larger development that would be presented later. A full presentation on the project is expected next month.


Tariff fears tied to biggest construction cost jump in 2 years

Sebastian Obando

Construction input prices jumped 1.4% in January, marking the largest monthly increase in two years, according to an analysis by Associated Builders and Contractors.

Energy costs drove much of that increase, with crude petroleum, natural gas and unprocessed energy all rising.

However, the price jump also stems from a rush to purchase materials ahead of potential tariffs, said Anirban Basu, ABC chief economist. The cost of inputs to construction now sits 40.5% higher than February 2020, according to the report.

Dive Insight:

The latest construction input price surge underscores concerns among contractors about material costs, particularly in light of new steel and aluminum tariffs, according to Associated General Contractors of America.

Even before Trump’s inauguration, the high probability of tariffs already appeared to have been driving price increases, said Ken Simonson, AGC chief economist.


“The mere threat of new tariffs appears to have led to a significant jump in the cost of many construction materials,” said Simonson, noting that the January data was collected prior to Trump’s inauguration. “Contractors that have started fixed-price projects will be squeezed by higher material costs, while rising costs and delayed availability will make future projects more expensive.”

The sharp increase in prices signals a shift after a year of relative stability for contractors. That’s largely due to three factors, said Basu.

“First, energy prices rose sharply. Second, producers often raise their prices at the start of the year,” said Basu. “And third, many purchasers rushed to buy inputs before potential tariffs could go into effect, and that surge in demand pushed prices higher.”

Of these factors, tariffs will likely have the most lasting impact, said Basu.

“A strong majority of contractors expect their sales to increase over the next six months,” said Basu. “The combination of increased demand for construction inputs and ongoing supply chain confusion suggest input price escalation could accelerate through the first half of 2025.”


Construction backlog posts gains to kick off the year

Sebastian Obando

Construction backlog increased to 8.4 months in January, reversing December’s slight decline, according to an Associated Builders and Contractors survey conducted from Jan. 21 to Feb. 3. The metric tracks the volume of work in builders’ pipelines.

The Western region posted the largest backlog growth, both on a monthly and year-over-year basis, while the South maintained the longest backlog at 9.5 months, despite seeing the steepest decline over the past year.

Contractor confidence remained strong, with sales and profit margin expectations rising, though staffing level expectations fell, according to ABC.

Dive Insight:

The backlog increase in January reflects continued stability in construction activity as contractors enter 2025, said Anirban Basu, ABC chief economist, in the release. 

“While backlog has remained within a narrow range over the past year, contractors broadly expect construction activity to pick up over the next six months,” said Basu. “Contractor confidence regarding sales has improved significantly over the past year, with much of that improvement occurring since November’s election.”

 


Though confidence in sales and profit margins continues to stay strong, the dip in staffing expectations comes after a sharp decline in job openings in late 2024. Open construction jobs fell by 55,000 to 217,000 in December compared to November, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

Basu noted, however, that all three readings remain above ABC’s threshold of 50, indicating expectations for growth over the next six months. That means hiring demand could bounce back sooner rather than later.

“The fact that staffing level expectations remain elevated suggests that job openings, which fell sharply during the final months of 2024, should rebound during the first half of 2025,” said Basu.


February 13, 2025

CT Construction Digest Thursday February 13, 2025

Lamont budget calls for CT to ramp up transportation projects

Keith M. Phaneuf

Gov. Ned Lamont’s new budget proposal would keep Connecticut on pace to dramatically accelerate the rebuilding of its aging highways, bridges and rail lines.

But that increase also could leave the transportation program needing new revenues in three years, and some legislators already have begun exploring new ways to pay for it — including a potential surcharge on certain delivered goods.

The $55.2 billion biennial budget that Lamont proposed Feb. 5 includes a nearly $2.3 billion Special Transportation Fund for the 2025-26 fiscal year and a $2.4 billion plan for 2026-27, boosting spending about 4% in each year.

The STF, which represents slightly less than 10% of the state’s overall budget, funds operating costs for the departments of Transportation and Motor Vehicles, supports rail and bus transit services, and covers the principal and interest on the transportation borrowing that, coupled with federal grants, pays for infrastructure construction projects.

Last week, the governor recommended spending an extra $158 million, a bump of nearly 20%, over the next two years on debt service for those loans. This would enable Connecticut to issue $1.3 billion in new transportation bonds in 2025-26 and $1.4 billion in 2026-27. The latter represents a 40% jump over current levels.

“No schedules have slipped,” DOT Commissioner Garrett Eucalitto said. “We are currently holding to those estimates.”

The department has been criticized for decades for not advancing more construction work, a problem many have attributed to insufficient staffing and other resources.

Lamont had been criticized in recent years for amassing hefty surpluses in the transportation fund. Some of the windfalls were attributed to inflation-driven surges in the sales tax receipts that — along with fuel tax revenues — support the STF. But as construction work slowed, the state also borrowed less than planned, leaving budgeted dollars unspent in the debt service line item.

The STF reserve, which holds annual surpluses from the fund, rose over the past three years from $241 million to almost $972 million, according to the state comptroller’s annual reports. That cushion account was slightly larger than 45% of last year’s entire transportation fund.

Gasoline station owners, fuel distributors and others began to press state officials to either do more construction work or cut gasoline taxes or provide some other relief given the huge unused revenues.

In other words: Use it or lose it.

Lamont and the legislature agreed last May to take a huge chunk of that $972 million reserve, more than $530 million, and pay off some transportation bonding early. State Treasurer Erick Russell, who developed this plan, estimates it will save the state about $63.5 million annually in interest costs.

Eucalitto, who inherited these challenges when he took over leadership in January 2023, has prioritized retaining and attracting new engineers and other professional staff.

“We’re at our highest staffing level since 2002 in terms of full-time employees,” he said, referring to the 3,337 full-timers currently in the department.

Travis Woodward, president of the union that represents state transportation engineers and planners, praised the administration for addressing the vacancy rate but said more staffing issues still need to be resolved.

“It’s on the legislature to break us free from our cyclical hiring practices and over-reliance on contracting out to privatized consultants for design, construction inspection and bridge safety inspections,” Woodward said. “Year over year, we see hundreds of millions of taxpayers’ dollars wasted on lower quality work at a higher premium. It’s time we hire enough state employees to do the full scope of work we need done.”

But Don Shubert, president of the Connecticut Construction Industry Association, praised the administration and said that if lawmakers approved the governor’s plan, it quickly would have a positive effect.

“A 40% increase in state bonding is something that the construction has been looking forward to since 2008” and the start of the last recession, he said. “Companies will start hiring, companies will start investing in new equipment, and the economic impact starts right away.”

Administration: Transportation program would need more funds by 2028

But that could create another challenge.

The administration estimates that doing more construction work not only would mean an end to big surpluses in the STF, but it also could trigger a need for more funds. Analysts project that by the 2027-28 fiscal year, the program would run a $177 million deficit.

Lamont proposed increasing bus and rail transit and parking fares; the state already subsidizes these services considerably. But the $29 million extra they raise annually already is factored into the $177 million deficit projection.

Sen. Christine Cohen, D-Guilford, co-chairwoman of the legislature’s Transportation Committee, also praised the governor Tuesday for prioritizing construction work. “I am thrilled at the commitment from the administration and from the Department of Transportation to get these projects done,” she said.

And Cohen said her panel already is exploring new options to keep the transportation fund solvent down the road.

Receipts from wholesale and retail taxes on gasoline largely have remained stagnant for decades, and the sales tax receipts dedicated to the STF tend to surge during periods of high inflation — something no one hopes will happen.

Cohen also said she believes many legislators are reluctant to discourage public transportation use by raising fares, which would further escalate the need for new revenue.

“I think it’s high time that we have this discussion,” she added.

Lamont failed to convince lawmakers in 2019 and 2020 to order electronic tolls on highways, and Cohen said she doesn’t expect that to be proposed this year either.

But the Guilford lawmaker said one option she expects to be included in a revenue bill to be raised in the coming weeks would create a new surcharge on certain delivered goods. She did not disclose details Tuesday but noted that there are some other states that impose such fees.

According to the Tax Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based fiscal policy group, Colorado first established a 28-cent charge on retail delivery of items subject to sales tax in 2022, and Minnesota imposed a 50-cent charge two years later.

Both states have “significant exemptions,” the tax foundation wrote in an analysis. States normally don’t impose charges against commercial carriers like UPS or FedEx, according to the foundation.

Sen. Tony Hwang of Fairfield, ranking Senate Republican on the Transportation Commiittee, also believes many legislators would oppose boosting transit fares.

Hwang noted that the financial services sector remains one of the linchpins of Connecticut’s economy, and that its workers — who already have absorbed rate hikes in recent years — rely heavily on train service to make the commute from Fairfield County to Manhattan.

“When do we get to a point where we break the camel’s back?” he asked.

Hwang added that while he’s pleased to see the administration focused on getting more construction work going, it also must carefully assess what levels of federal transportation aid Connecticut can expect under President Donald Trump’s new administration.

The Trump administration warned states in late January that it intends, “to the maximum extent permitted by law,” to link federal transportation funding to local compliance with policies on masks, vaccines, tolls and immigration enforcement. 

Eucalitto, who met last week with Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, declined to speculate on how the Trump administration might interpret the law.

But Eucalitto was hopeful that Washington would continue to collaborate with all states to prioritize transportation construction.

“We all know he [Trump] is a builder. He wants to build,” the commissioner added. “That’s just something we need to wait for.”


DOD halts PLAs on construction projects

Zachary Phillips

The Department of Defense has ordered its contracting officers to halt the use of project labor agreements on “large-scale construction projects,” according to a memo obtained by Construction Dive.

The notice, dated Feb. 7, says contracting officers shall remove PLA requirements created by former President Joe Biden that apply to projects receiving $35 million or more in federal funds.

As part of the memo — signed by John M. Tenaglia, principal director of defense pricing, contracting and acquisition policy for the DOD — contracting officers were ordered to amend solicitations for federal contracts to remove PLA requirements.

Dive Insight:

AGC CEO Jeffrey Shoaf said in a statement that it had anticipated a move like the DOD’s and it proved the AGC’s past assertions that the PLA mandate was not legal.

“We expect all federal agencies involved in procuring construction services to follow suit and drop what is clearly an unlawful mandate from their construction solicitations,” Shoaf said.

The Defense Department did not respond to Construction Dive’s request for more information.

The memo comes a few weeks after a U.S. Federal Claims judge hamstrung the order by ruling in favor of a group of construction companies that filed protests against the implementation of the mandate on specific projects. Judge Ryan Holte said in his Jan. 21 ruling that the implementation of the mandate on seven contract procedures in 2024 ignored federal agencies’ own research indicating PLAs would be anti-competitive and relied on “arbitrary and capricious” policy.

The Associated General Contractors of America helped facilitate the legal challenge to Biden’s approach of a PLA mandate.

Holte’s decision, however, only directly impacted bid protests filed in six states over projects solicited by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, General Services Administration and Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command. Both USACE and NAVFAC are part of the DOD.

The ruling cut off the mandate at the knees, and opened the door for other bid protest challenges, Dirk Haire, Washington, D.C.-based partner at Philadelphia-headquartered law firm Fox Rothschild said at the time. He represented some of the plaintiffs in the bid protest case.

The DOD contracts out billions of dollars worth of construction work each year. For example, in November, the agency awarded roughly $2.3 billion worth of design, engineering and construction work, according to the Construction Broadsheet.


Naugatuck is first to join CT's new Municipal Redevelopment Authority: 'We're way ahead of the game'

Andreas Yilma

NAUGATUCK — The borough is the first town statewide to join the Connecticut Municipal Redevelopment Authority, newly established to help municipalities with transit oriented development.

At its regular Feb. 4 meeting, the Board of Mayor and Burgesses unanimously approved, following a hearing, to adopt a resolution to join the MRDA as a member municipality. The resolution was effective the day of the vote.

MRDA, a quasi-public state agency created in 2024 by state law, is responsible for helping municipalities with transit-oriented development, mainly focusing on the growth of new housing, as defined under state statutes.

"MRDA is a vehicle to help municipalities in transit oriented development downtown projects," Mayor N. Warren "Pete" Hess said. "It just so happens that Naugatuck is very far along in the process."

The borough is developing 7.75 acres at the corner of Maple Street and Old Firehouse Road, known as Parcel B, into a residential and commercial development.

The state Department of Transportation has already made plans and allotted funding to relocate the Naugatuck train station right next to The Station Restaurant at 195 Water St. to the middle of Parcel B where Water Street will be extended. Construction is expected to begin in the spring.

This project will connect the existing downtown area to the Transit Oriented Development project, which adjoins the Waterbury Branch Line adjacent to the location of the proposed new train platform.

Naugatuck grant writer Danielle Goeway said it's free to join and besides funding, the MRDA provides technical support as well.

"We're way ahead of the game," Goeway said. "There's a lot of opportunities here for Parcel B, Parcel A, some of the parking spots downtown."

Hess said MRDA Executive Director David Kooris has come to Naugatuck and borough officials have already met with him twice.

"This funding can apply not just to the municipality but to our development partners as well or for that matter anyone within a half-a-mile radius of the train station downtown," Hess said. "So anything in that half-mile radius is in the new district."

Hess said borough officials are preparing to be the first town statewide to file an application. As workers are beginning phase one of Parcel B, borough officials will be applying for some additional funding regarding phase two for Pennrose.

"This one is something that came at exactly the right moment," Hess said.



February 12, 2025

CT Construction Digest Wednesday February 12, 2025

Southington's old library building is demolished now that the new one is open


SOUTHINGTON — Crews have been hard at work demolishing the old Southington Public Library at 255 Main St. now that the new, 30,000-sqaure-foot library opened next door in December.

The older building had served as the library's location for about 50 years, but officials said it had become too small and outdated. It was dedicated on June 21, 1975, according to the library.

Efforts to build a new, state-of-the-art building have been in the works for several years, including residents' approval of $16.9 million for the project in 2021. A $5 million state grant was awarded in 2023 to increase the square footage and improve the architectural features of the building. The total cost of the project was $21.9 million.

The new library has two floors. The first floor includes a program room, circulation workroom, lobby, friends' workroom, book sales, and more. The second floor includes an information office, teen room, study areas, books, and seating. 

The Southington Public Library recently shared a video to its Facebook page that showed Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. in the end stages of demolishing the old building.


Plan to turn former West Hartford UConn campus into housing, retail come before Town Council Tuesday

Michael Walsh

WEST HARTFORD — The proposed redevelopment of the former University of Connecticut campus into housing and commercial space will be the subject of a Town Council public hearing on Tuesday.

WeHa Development Group LLC is seeking a zoning change for 1800 Asylum Ave. that would allow them to convert the long-vacant property into Heritage Park, a development consisting of six duplex townhomes, 93 rental one- and two-bedroom units, 19 townhomes that will be for sale and a 90-unit assisted living facility combined with a grocery store, a spa facility and more than 42,000 square feet of other retail uses, including a restaurant.

The proposal is among nearly a dozen active and in progress housing developments in town.

Mayor Shari Cantor said Monday that the public hearing is scheduled to proceed.

It has been a long road to redevelopment for the former UConn campus, which has been vacant since the university moved the school to downtown Hartford around eight years ago. The site, which has precarious wetlands and contaminant conditions, has had multiple owners in that time, with some plans failing and fizzling out. The Town Council even voted to buy the property in 2016 before backing out on the deal after discovering PCB contaminants.

But now, it seems that the site is poised to be the latest housing development approved in West Hartford.

And combined with the 322 multifamily housing units the same developer already gained approval for across the street at 1700 Asylum Ave. in the former campus parking lot, the project's full scope would be the largest development in town since Blue Back Square, bringing 440 new homes to the area, along with 90 assisted living units, combined with retail.

Residences at Heritage Park at 1700 Asylum Ave. has since been sold off by WeHa Development Group LLC to Garden Homes, who will oversee the construction and management of the site.

The plans for the former campus, which still retains rundown university buildings that first welcomed students in 1970, has already received approvals and recommendations from both the town Plan and Zoning Commission and the Design Review Advisory Committee.

Currently, the plans call for 5% of the 93 rental units to be set aside as affordable housing, which is around five units. Staff comments included in the public hearing's documents suggested developers increase that number to 8%. West Hartford town leaders and elected officials have been seeking more affordable units in housing developments and could make the request at Tuesday night's Town Council meeting.

The Plan and Zoning Commission, in its approval, also asked the developers to "fully address the traffic and associated bicycle and pedestrian related comments."

Residents will have their chance to address the Town Council about the proposed development at the public hearing, which begins at 5:30 p.m. on Feb. 11. The Town Council could make their decision on whether or not to approve the development at its regular meeting that will follow the public hearing. 


Struck gas line in Waterbury spurs evacuations, Baldwin Street closure, police say

Jessica Bravo, Bruno Matarazzo

WATERBURY — The loud hissing sound of natural gas venting out of a high-pressure gas main on Baldwin Street filled the neighborhood on Tuesday afternoon after the line had been struck by a work crew.

A handful of homes near the breach on Baldwin Street near Warren and Laval streets were evacuated and buses were brought in to provide warmth from the near-freezing temperatures outside. 

Waterbury Fire Deputy Chief Stephen Ayotte said two crews from Eversource responded to the scene to dig two holes on both sides of the breach to "squeeze the line down" and cut the flow of gas. 

Ayotte said a crew from Feeney Brothers Utility Services was working on Baldwin Street to replace the gas main where it had been struck. 

The road was closed between Warren and Laval streets, according to Waterbury police Lt. Ryan Bessette.

 

New tariffs on steel, aluminum draw mixed reactions from Connecticut businesses and industry experts

Luther Turmelle

Having threatened, implemented and then pulled back on tariffs involving imports from Canada and Mexico earlier this month, President Donald J. Trump has now implemented 25 % tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports.

Monday's tariff hikes impact Canada and Mexico the most because those countries, along with Brazil, are the top three foreign trade partners in terms of steel imports.

As of Tuesday evening, it was still unclear how much steel Connecticut businesses purchased from international sources in 2024. But according to American Iron and Steel Institute, Canada was the top importer of steel into the United States in 2024 with 6.56 million tons, followed by Brazil with 4.5 million tons and Mexico with 3.52 million tons.

With that in mind, here are some things to know:

What is a tariff?

A tariff is a tax on imported goods and services, according to Michael Stanaitis, a senior lecturer on global inquiry at American University in Washington, D.C. It is a type of trade regulation designed to protect domestic industries and increase revenue for the government.

Who pays for tariffs?

Technically speaking, importers pay for the tariffs, Stanaitis said. But he said most economists agree that much of the cost of tariffs is paid by consumers in the form of a higher price for the goods they purchase.

What will the impact of the latest tariffs be on Connecticut?

The response depends upon who you are asking.

Brian Raff, vice president of the Chicago-based trade group American Institute of Steel Construction, said the tariffs are beneficial to the domestic industry as a whole, whether it involves producers, fabricators or even end users. The trade group represents about 1,000 steel fabricators across the country, including about 17 in Connecticut.

"The steel industry is painted with a very broad brush," Raff said. "You've got a very robust supply chain that is willing and able to take care of any additional demands that these tariffs may produce domestically. The United States makes 100 million tons of steel per year, 10 million of which can be used for construction; there's plenty of capacity here."

What the Trump tariffs that were put in place Monday do that wasn't done in the president's first term, according to Raff, is close a loophole that allowed foreign steel manufacturers to skirt paying the levy on their imports. That loophole, he said, allowed steel that was produced in foreign mills and modified by foreign fabricators to flood the U.S. market at a price that domestic companies couldn't compete with.

"Foreign steel producers discovered that if they sent their steel to foreign fabricators, who then sent the fabricated steel to America, they could avoid the tariffs," he said. Fabricated steel, Raff said, is any process that takes raw steel and changes it to the specifications that are need for its inclusion in whatever finished product it is becoming part of.

To illustrate his point, Raff said that in 2024, imports of fabricated steel from Canada represented 25% of all imports in that category — an increase of 8% over 2023.

"That's the equivalent of 50 Brooklyn Bridges worth of steel," he said.

Raff said he doesn't expect the latest Trump tariffs to slow down any supply chains of projects that use steel.

"Big projects that use steel take a long time to develop," he said  "It's not as if the switch flips and the tariffs screw up everything. Projects that are being considered now won't be started for a year to 18 months. And you've got a very robust supply chain in this country, companies that are willing and able to take on increased demands."

One of the nation's three largest structural steel product makers has a mill here in Connecticut, according to Raff. North Carolina-based Nucor Corp. has a plant on Toelles Road in Wallingford. Company officials announced last month that the Wallingford plant would stop making wire rods because of what Nucor executives termed challenging market conditions.

The Wallingford plant still produces wire mesh, rebar and bright basic wire, a general purpose product for a broad variety of industrial and commercial uses. 

Howard Lohmann Jr., who runs Meriden-based Logan Steel with his brother Erik, said "the impact is that there is going to be a short-term demand increase" as well as an increase in prices. But Howard Lohmann, who everyone calls "Junior," said the tariffs will ultimately encourage more domestic production of steel.

"There's going to be a little hiccup," Lohmann said. "But it's going to keep more material locally produced."

For big projects like hotels or office buildings, he said the tariffs are likely to increase the total cost of the work by a percentage point or two.

Lohmann said the tariffs will be the most painful to the end user, whether that is a airline buying a plane or jet engine, a hospital or healthcare practice buying a new piece of diagnostic equipment, or someone purchasing a new car.

Steel fabrication is listed as one of the things that Logan Steel does for customers. But Lohmann said he prefers to view the company's primary business as "something that adds value customers."

"Fabrication is anything I can do to a piece of steel," he said. "But we also do work for fabricators, so I like to consider us a value added shop."

Following Trump's return to the White House, Lohmann said Logan Steel started buying as much steel as it could in an effort to lock in prices.

"We felt it was coming and so we locked in prices for 90 days," he said. "We consume about four tractor-trailer loads a week and we have about 20 truckloads worth of inventory left."

Each tractor-trailer load holds about 25 tons of steel, according to Lohmann.

"We have seen an increase of $100 per ton in the last week or so," he said. "So that translates into $2,500 more per truckload."

The price spike, according to Lohmann, is because "there is an increase in demand because of shortage of imported material on the market."

Lohmann said his primary focus is serving the needs of his regular customers.

"If I get a call from someone who I haven't done business (with) before, I have to evaluate what he's looking for," he said. "If that type of customer is looking for a large amount of steel, I will probably tell them I can provide a smaller portion or let them know I can't help them. I always want to cultivate new business, but not at the expense of my regular customers."

Less optimistic views of the new tariffs

Chris DiPentima is president and chief executive officer of CBIA, the state's largest business organization, with thousands of member companies of all sizes. Price increases will be hard to avoid, he said of the tariffs, depending upon the individual circumstances of each company.

"Talking to the raw material suppliers today, they're going to pass it (the increased costs) all along the supply chain," DiPentima said. "The supply chain is the bread and butter of the state's aerospace, medical device and manufacturing companies across the board. The challenge for each individual company is will they able to pass along the increase in their costs in the form of higher price or are they bound by contract to a lower price."

If they are forced to keep their prices down by contract or for other reason, they will have to find other ways to offset their increased production costs, he said.

"They may have reduce the number of workers or postpone technology upgrades, which hurts innovation," DiPentima said. "Business like predictability and security."

Small and mid-sized companies will be hurt the most by the tariffs on steel and aluminum, he said, because of the comparatively short-time in which the Trump administration has enacted the levies.

"When there's a longer runway the companies have more lead time to react and stockpile" raw materials, DiPentima said. "Smaller and mid-sized companies don't have the financial resources to cover the increased costs from the period of time that it takes to purchase the materials you need, produce the product, sell it and then wait to get paid. You're still sitting on that cash increase for an extended period of time."

Even one of Connecticut's marquee companies, Groton-based Electric Boat, is showing signs of feeling the economic pinch, he said.

"The president of Electric Boat mentioned recently that there's cost pressures on them because tariffs," DiPentima said. "They are building subs that came from contracts that were signed in 2019. That has resulted in Electric Boat scaling back its hiring efforts from 5,000 workers a year to 3,000 a year, he said.

"It doesn't make sense for them to keep hiring if they don’t have the parts to do the work," DiPentima said.

Mohammad Elahee, a professor of international business at Quinnipiac University, said that the tariffs would result "in a lot of losers at companies and among consumers alike.

"U.S. steel producers may get some temporary relief, but companies in the aircraft and manufacturing sectors will be hurt," Elahee said, "So will producers who need steel or aluminum to put their products in. And ultimately, consumers will pay higher prices for a variety of products they buy."

Elahee said that while the U.S. government needs "to do something to protect our steel industry," tariffs aren't the answer.


Stamford board gives Greenwich developer OK to build hotel next to Curley's Diner but with conditions

Robert Marchant

STAMFORD — An extended-stay hotel next to Curley's Diner on Main Street has been given the green light, but with conditions and final approval pending once the conditions are met.

The Zoning Board's conditional approval includes a demand that the developers would have to add some kind of physical barrier to a passageway along the side of the property that would be shared by motorists and pedestrians and could be dangerous for the walkers. 

A large-scale developer based in Greenwich, Wellbuilt Company, is proposing the project. The hotel would house 99 units in a 10-story structure at 0 West Park Place on a city-owned parking lot next to Curley's Diner. 

The conditions attached to the approvals stated that the developers would add "physical barrier between vehicles and pedestrians to ensure safe pedestrian access" before a building permit was issued, with a recommendation for how to make the fix.  

"It needs to come back to the board for our approval, and we recommend bollards be utilized," said Board Chairman David Stein. Bollards are sturdy, short vertical posts.

While some area residents and nearby merchants expressed concerns about the project, the proposal also had strong support from the business community.

Heather Cavanaugh, president of the Stamford Chamber of Commerce, said the hotel would be a good addition to community and provide new options for business travelers in the region, as well as other visitors drawn to the city.

Downtown Stamford already has a number of hotels operating in the district with another one is being proposed at the office building at 300 Main St., the former Stamford Trust Company.