December 18, 2024

CT Construction Digest Wednesday December 18, 2024

New Middletown parking garage, refurbished canoe club, open-air music stadium projects taking shape

Cassandra Day

MIDDLETOWN — Things are moving along on several components of the city’s Return to the Riverfront master plan of redevelopment, including a new parking garage and upgrades to the former canoe club on the Connecticut River.

The proposed, block-size Village at Riverside mixed-use development, planned for property bordered by Court and Main streets and deKoven and Dingwall drives, is anticipated to help the city finally reconnect to its riverfront via a walking bridge over Route 9. 

Some 600 spaces are expected to be created for the public, retail customers, residents of the development and police.

These will replace parking lost when the municipal parking lot on Court Street was demolished in 2018.

The Village is expected to include “affordable, luxury” housing units, with some 19 townhomes, 258 apartments consisting of studios and one- and two-bedroom units, and about 56 new on-street parking spaces, Wonder Works Construction of New York has said. 

The city is applying for a $250,000 Community Investment Fund planning grant from the state, according to Economic and Community Development Director Christine Marques, who provided project updates during the Dec. 10 meeting. 

The program “unlocks” economic potential for underserved communities, according to the CIF website.

If awarded, she said, the money would be used for architectural and engineering services for the parking arcade, and could open up funding for a CIF implementation grant to build the garage. 

EDC staff will be putting out a request for proposals for environmental professionals and an engineering team for the reclamation of three city-owned properties off River Road, Marques explained.

These include the former Peterson Oil plot at 44 River Road, former Jackson Corrugated Container at 225 River Road and the decommissioned sewage treatment plant at 100 River Road.

The New Haven Center for Performing Arts has proposed to build an outdoor concert venue on the Peterson property.

The project has received $2.1 million in American Rescue Plan Act funding.

The Connecticut Port Authority has recommended the project for a $1.4 million grant from the state Bond Commission, which would require an additional 20 percent or so match by the city, Marques said. 

The Bond Commission still needs to review the request, she added.

Work on the former Mattabesett Canoe Club at 80 Harbor Drive, occupied by Tate’s restaurant since early May, is nearly done, Community Development Specialist Brian Gartner reported.

All that remains is completion of the second-floor rear deck, he said.

All design issues have been rectified, Gartner added. The elevator is also in operation.

Half of the ordered steel is being kept on the north side of the building, along with wood materials and railings. 

Gartner expects the full order will be in sometime this week.

Middletown Common Council Pro Tempore Jeanette Blackwell asked about parking spaces for Harbor Park visitors, some of which have been designated with a sign exclusively for Tate’s.

The small lot at Columbus Point, at the southernmost portion of Harbor Park, is expected to be expanded, Marques said. Public Works staff are now in the process of creating a concept plan.


Stratford approves $16.7M floodwall to protect riverside sewage treatment plant

Richard Chumney

STRATFORD — Town officials are moving forward with a $16.7 million plan to protect the sewage treatment plant from powerful storms and rising sea levels by building a floodwall around the riverside facility. 

The town council voted unanimously this week to issue bonds and appropriate funds to pay for the construction project, which is now expected to start as soon as May and take about two years to complete. 

The treatment plant, which has the capacity to process up to 11.5 million gallons of sewage a day, sits in a flood zone on the banks of the Housatonic River, making it especially vulnerable to rising sea levels. 

The facility is shielded by a series of earthen dikes that date to the early 1970s, but engineers believe the protective barriers may not be strong enough to withstand increasingly intense storms.  

Town Engineer John Casey said the roots of the project stretch back to 2012, when Hurricane Sandy inundated Stratford with so much water that the facility came within about a foot of catastrophic flooding.  

“We had severe coastal flooding,” Casey told the council during a meeting earlier this month. “We felt that there was a vulnerability for the treatment plant (and) that our existing protection was not adequate.” 
 
At a Water Pollution Control Authority meeting last month, David Barstow of GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc., an engineering firm hired to help lead the project, said the floodwall would be 18 feet high at its tallest point. 

Barstow also said the structure would be about five feet taller than the highest point on the existing dikes, ensuring the treatment plant would be protected from flooding brought by a 500-year storm. 

“The plant currently handles most of the wastewater for the town,” Barstow said. “As you can imagine, if something happens to the plant, it's going to be a big cost impact to make the repairs.” 

Town officials have long eyed increased flood protections for the treatment plant, which could be forced to temporarily shut down and stop processing sewage if a storm submerges the facility in flood waters.  

A permanent floodwall for the facility was among the recommendations included in a 2016 coastal residency plan created to outline potential solutions to the town’s growing flooding issues. 

According to data from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers included in the plan, the sea level of the Long Island Sound at Stratford is on the rise and is projected to increase between 0.4 feet and 2.2 feet by 2065. 

Barstow said the floodwall, which would be built out of reinforced concrete and have an exposed height of four to six feet, would be about 3,100 feet in length and would also incorporate parts of the dikes.

“We're looking to improve the existing dikes and reuse those as much as we can to reduce costs,” Barstow said. 

Barstow said he hopes to get authorization to move forward with the project from the state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection by March and start construction in May. He noted the work is expected to take two years to complete.

Once the new perimeter is finished, the facility would be accessible through a large floodgate that could be closed ahead of storms. Barstow said the gate would employ steel braces to ensure it is watertight. 

Casey has said the town plans to use $2.7 million in grant funding that was awarded in 2020 by the Federal Emergency Management Agency for coastal resiliency efforts to help pay for the floodwall.


State poised to borrow tens of millions to incentivize multifamily development

Michael Puffer

The state Bond Commission is poised to authorize tens of millions in borrowing Friday to help fund multifamily developments throughout the state.

Housing development is a big chunk of the $423.1 million borrowing package going before the bond commission on Friday.

The agenda includes $50 million for the state Department of Housing’s Build for CT program, which helps developers finance affordable and middle-income rental housing projects.

The state Department of Housing is up for another $20 million, which will pass to the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority to fund construction or rehabilitation of 186 housing units.  

Friday’s agenda includes funds to pass through the Capital Region Development Authority as loans to developers. Repayment of those loans will cycle back to the CRDA to fund future projects.

The CRDA is up for $9.5 million, to fund a loan to help Norwalk-based Spinnaker Real Estate Partners build 239 apartments in two buildings wrapping existing buildings on the 3.2-acre property at 55 Elm St.

Spinnaker is converting two former state office buildings on the site into 164 apartments. The state funding will help it finance two new apartment buildings. These projects are part of a broader initiative by the city and CRDA to transform vacant lots and underused buildings around Bushnell Park into a vibrant neighborhood.

The Bond Commission will vote on a proposed $6.5 million for CRDA, which the quasi-public agency would lend to Simon Konover to help the company finance an approximately 150-unit apartment complex in East Hartford. The development would be located on a 35-acre site at 341 East River Drive, near the Connecticut River.

The CRDA is also up for a $4 million grant for upgrades at the Pratt & Whitney Stadium at Renschler Field in East Hartford, including replacement of metal detectors and repairs of the IT network, sound, video and TV production equipment.

The University of Connecticut is poised to receive $33 million in aid for several initiatives, including:

$10 million for IT equipment;

$10 million for upgrades to the Gampel Pavilion in Storrs, including replacement of the lower-bowl retractable seating and videoboard system, and upgrades to show lighting;

$10 million for scientific equipment at the UConn Health Center;

$3 million for IT infrastructure at the UConn Health Center. 


December 17, 2024

CT Construction Digest Tuesday December 17, 2024


Friday December 20th Bond Commission Agenda


Cheshire breaks ground for north end school and Norton Elementary projects

Christian Metzger

CHESHIRE — The cold drizzle Monday was perfect for the groundbreaking for two elementary school projects — one in the north end of town and the second at Norton Elementary, according to Cheshire Superintendent of Schools Jeffrey Solan.

As students and town officials gathered for some ceremonial shoveling at the 44-acre snow-covered parcel at Jarvis Street and Marion Road that will be the new north end school, Solan recalled that in response to the unlikely successful vote for the projects, someone posted on social media that "Hell froze over." The weather on Monday, he said, seemed fitting for the start of the momentous projects. 

Costing $90 million, the north end school will be the largest capital project the town has ever undertaken. The reconstruction and modernization of Norton Elementary at 414 North Brooksvale Road is projected to cost $76 million. 

To be built on farmland, the yet-unnamed north end school will house 700 prekindergarten through sixth-grade students.

With a modern yet rustic barn-like facade meant to harken back to the roots of the land it will occupy, the school will have five classrooms per grade level, art rooms, music rooms, a two-floor library, an amphitheater courtyard, four playscapes for children in different age groups, two soccer fields, and a gymnasium that will be available to the community. 

Norton will have similar facilities to accommodate the district's growing elementary school population. Both schools will be environmentally sustainable and powered by a hybrid geothermal system; officials hope to add solar panels.

Officials anticipate the construction at both schools will be completed by fall 2026.

For most municipalities, one school project is a massive undertaking and expense; it's rare to see two school projects undertaken simultaneously. However, Cheshire has seen a steep increase in elementary school students in recent years, with enrollment at Highland Elementary alone increasing by 200 over five years ago when enrollment bottomed out for the district. 

A contributing factor has been a construction boom that has attracted new families to the area. With 600 additional multifamily units expected to be built over the next year, the student population will continue to swell.

"It's exciting and overwhelming at the same time," Solan said. "The two buildings are really necessary given the population shifts that we've seen, particularly at the elementary grades. We have more than 900 kids at Highland right now, so it's necessary, but it's also a lot to take on at one time." 

Solan added that the school projects were a unique opportunity, working with designers and members of the community to integrate them into the surrounding areas, which is why they settled on heavy greenery and the barn design for the north end school and walking trails that connect with the Farmington Trail over by Norton.
 
Students and members of town organizations involved in the planning over the past two years attended the groundbreaking ceremony. They all took turns shoveling dirt to commemorate the work that has gone into the project so far.

"As an educator by profession, I truly believe it takes a village to raise a child, and I stand before you really incredibly proud to stand here as part of this village of caring and committed individuals, past and present, who share a deep passion for supporting our children's education," said Board of Education Chair Samantha Rosenberg. 

"This new state-of-the-art facility reflects not only the value of this town but also instills in our students an understanding of the importance of community," she said.

name is expected to be chosen for the north end school in six months.

Once both schools open to the public, Chapman Elementary and Darcey School will be shuttered. There has yet to be a concrete plan for the future of the buildings.


Former New Haven Coliseum gets its first tenants as Square 10 project wraps up first building

Mark Zaretsky

NEW HAVEN —  The first 11 tenants have moved into The Anthem at Square 10, the first building to be nearly completed in a sweeping remake of the downtown commercial site where the New Haven Veterans Memorial Coliseum once stood.

They'll soon be joined by a Melting Pot fondue restaurant, a Common Grounds coffee shop and a relocated Elm City Market, among other amenities.

An outdoor pool, gym and some co-working spaces also are ready, along with the second and third residential floors. Developer LWLP New Haven LLC is working to get the fourth through seventh floors of the $76 million "Phase 1A" building ready to be lived in this winter.

The nearly complete building, development of which was aided by a $999,000 state remediation grant, is the first of several high-rise commercial buildings going up off South Orange Street as part of the project. 

Hill/City Point Alder Carmen Rodriguez, D-6, said the building "is absolutely stitching neighborhoods back together," and the neighborhood is walkable.

Lou Mangini, a staffer for U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-3, also pointed out that "just a few years ago, no one walked from downtown to Union Station," and now they do.

The five-acre site, which has been a parking lot since the coliseum was imploded on Jan. 20, 2007, is at the city's front door, where vehicles exiting Interstate 95 and Interstate 91 on Route 34 first enter downtown. It eventually will be home to 700 units, with ground floor retail, pool, a health club, a public plaza and many other amenities. 

Phase 1 is a 3.5-acre parcel that will be developed in three sub-phases, which will include housing, public amenities and a "life sciences" medical and lab office building, city officials said.

It was dedicated nearly 18 years after the implosion, which came in a billowing cloud of dust. The new building includes 16,000 square feet of retail space, 25,000 square feet of public open space, a public plaza and 200 residential units — including 40 affordable units.

Phase 1B calls for construction of a 650-space parking garage and an additional 75 to 100 apartments, 20 percent of which will be affordable units, officials said. The new housing will partially wrap around the garage structure. 

It's part of the broader Downtown Crossing project, which aims to reconnect downtown New Haven to nearby neighborhoods, such as the Hill, City Point, Long Wharf and Wooster Square.

LWLP, a consortium made up of Spinnaker Real Estate Partners, the Fieber Group and KDP, showed off its progress Monday in a dedication and preview event. It included a ribbon-cutting ceremony and tours of the parts of the building that are ready.

Spinnaker Executive Vice President of Development Frank Caico said he and his staff spent two years talking to people in order to come up with a "very inclusive and collaborative" project.

"I'm proud to say that we've exceeded the development requirements," he said, adding throughout construction, there have been "very few issues, if any, that I'm aware of."

Caico said the first residents moved in on Oct. 28 and 30 apartments have been leased so far. Market rate apartments begin at $1,900 for studios, $2,625 for one-bedrooms and $3,300 for two-bedrooms.

The building's commercial spaces, at this point, are "essentially 100 percent leased," Caico said, although a final retail space is still being finalized and has yet to be announced.

The building's tenants so far include a number of medical students and people who work at Yale, said Property Manager Brian Alves, who grew up in Springfield, Mass., lives in Stratford and said he saw Huey Lewis and the News, Aerosmith and monster truck rallies at the coliseum back in the day.

Elm City Market, Common Grounds and the Melting Pot all are expected to open during the second quarter of 2025, Alves said.

He said he expects the seventh floor to be done by Dec. 20, the sixth to be done in early January and the fifth to be complete by the end of January.

The first building will offer 200 of the 500 new housing units in the overall complex, said Mayor Justin Elicker.

Elicker, who has made "inclusive growth" the centerpiece of his development agenda, said the Anthem at Square 10 development is just one example of how "New Haven is just hopping."

Over the past five years, New Haven has added 2,000 new or renovated housing units, with 3,500 more in the pipeline, he said.

The 40 affordable units in the first building include 20 for households at 50 percent to 60 percent of the area median income, or AMI, and 20 units for households at 61 percent to 100 percent of the AMI.

"We want to make sure that we grow inclusively," Elicker said.

He said he is looking forward to completing the next two buildings, in phases 1B and 1C. The latter is being developed by Ancora L&G, based in Durham, N.C. Ancora specializes in building high-quality medical, laboratory environments "in academic centers of distinction," the city has said.

City Economic Development Administrator Michael Piscitelli called the project, launched in 2022, "the very start of a new transformational neighborhood here in New Haven."

State Department of Economic Development Deputy Commissioner Matt Pugliese joked about his frequent visits to New Haven to announce to new projects.

"There's so many different investments," Pugliese said.


CT CONSTRUCTION DIGEST MONDAY DECEMBER 16, 2024

New Norwalk High and South Norwalk School take shape, with construction on schedule: 'Very exciting'

Kalleen Rose Ozanic

NORWALK — Construction is on schedule at the sites of the new Norwalk High School and South Norwalk School, although it's not certain if the latter will have solar panels or open in fall 2025 as expected.

The new Norwalk High School project has a longer construction timeline than the South Norwalk School. Site grading and the foundation is complete at the site of the new high school, said Alan Lo, Norwalk building and facilities manager. The foundation for the school’s swimming pool is being tested to ensure it is watertight, he said. 

The new Norwalk High School is slated to welcome students in fall 2027, with the new sports complex atop the bones of the old school to be completed by August 2028, Lo said. The school’s tennis courts will come soon after in the fall of 2028, he said. In the meantime, "many" athletic programs have been displaced during construction, according to an FAQ page for the project.

The district has busing plans to bring student athletes to other sports spaces during the construction, Norwalk Public Schools Media Relations Specialist Emily Morgan said this year.

At the South Norwalk School construction site, the building is framed out and interior partitions and masonry are being installed, Lo said.

“It’s very exciting,” the building and facilities manager said. Lo said he can't confirm until April that the school's construction will have come far enough along to welcome students on time.

"I know we are scheduled to open (on time), assuming that everything (continues) to go smoothly," Lo said.

Nevertheless, the South Norwalk School's roof is being installed soon, he said last Tuesday. But whether solar panels will actually go on that roof is unclear. Last summer, officials had hoped the school could be entirely solar-powered. If the school ends up having solar panels on the roof, they will actually provide a maximum of 30 percent of the school’s peak energy usage, Lo said.

He spoke to the city’s Land Use and Building Management Committee and the Facilities committee of the school board this month about how the intended partnership with South Norwalk Electric and Water to implement ground mounted and rooftop solar panels wasn't feasible. SNEW and Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative, of which the utility company is a member, found energy savings from the solar project wouldn't break even on the costs of a 20-year power purchasing agreement, according to Lo and a memo provided to the committees.

In a power purchasing agreement, a “third-party developer installs, owns, and operates an energy system on a customer’s property,” according to Better Buildings of the United States Department of Energy.

Because the school is located within SNEW’s “electric service boundaries,” the memo states, Lo said that a power purchase agreement cannot work without the utility company. 

The city purchasing panels and hiring a contractor is the only way to install them on the school's roof, Lo said. If leftover funds are available after the South Norwalk School construction is completed, the city could use it to buy solar panels and engage a contractor to install them, Lo said. He estimated this would cost $800,000.

Should the cost of the panels and contractor exceed any potential leftover funds by the school’s completion, a capital request could be made to further fund the solar project.

Those possibilities hinge on financial calculations Lo said he would complete by September 2025 to determine if the city funding the solar project is financially feasible.

Despite the uncertainty, Lo said that the city has a “commitment” to rooftop solar and looks to use the option wherever possible. He pointed out completed solar panel projects at Jefferson Marine Science Elementary School, Ponus Ridge STEAM Academy, Naramake Elementary School, and a solar project at Cranbury Elementary School that he said would be completed in the spring. 

Regardless, any solar would not be installed at South Norwalk until spring 2026 after it’s clear the school’s roof is stable, without leaks, and ready for installation, Lo said.


Brookfield awarded $1.5 million toward sewer installation at almost 100 homes

Sandra Diamond Fox

BROOKFIELD — The town recently received a grant that will go toward helping install sewer systems for nearly 100 homes while also protecting the Long Island Sound.

The $1.5 million grant, awarded through the Long Island Sound Futures Fund, will go to the town’s Water Pollution Control Authority for construction of a sewer extension in the Dean and Pocono Road area, said Alison Kennedy, operations manager of the Brookfield Water Pollution Control Authority.

“We have some properties along that road whose septic systems are not doing well,” Brookfield First Selectman Steve Dunn said. “They’re all working but some are on their last legs.”

Kennedy said the extension will serve 91 residential homes and possibly the Town Hall campus. A complete design of the project is anticipated by July 2025.

She said by replacing the septic systems with sewer, the town will be eliminating a lot of nitrogen and phosphorus from entering the Housatonic Watershed, in addition to any E. coli contamination of surface water.

“All of these nutrients going into the Still River in the Housatonic Watershed eventually feed the Long Island Sound,” she said. “So the reduction of nutrients would help the Long Island Sound be a healthier environment.”

The $1.5 million is the maximum award of the grant, and the town’s match for the grant is $750,000, to total $2.25 million, Kennedy added.

The Long Island Sound Futures Fund said the project will reduce 34 pounds of nitrogen, 24 pounds of phosphorus, and the potential risks to public health and wildlife habitats due to water quality issues.

Dunn said he’s very pleased with the grant award.

“This has been under consideration for a few years now. We’re very thankful that we got a grant,” he said.

“Overall, this really helps to build a sewer system along the Still River Greenway to protect the Still River and make it much more affordable for the residents,” he added.

The Long Island Futures Fund project grant has been awarded through the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, in partnership with the Long Island Sound Study and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Thirty-one new grants totaling $12.5 million were awarded, according to its website.

The Futures Fund "supports efforts to address sewage pollution by providing grants which test innovative approaches to conservation, deliver transformative projects and support people and communities who value the sound and take a direct role in its future," according to its website.

'Two different sewer alternatives'

The town is in the final design phase of the project, Kennedy said.

“Our engineers are bringing the final design two different sewer alternatives —  one would be a full gravity system and one would be a low pressure system,” said Kennedy.

She said the town will decide which of those systems it will choose. She added much of that will be dependent on costs as well.

Depending on which system is used, the cost will be between $3.4 million and $6.7 million, Dunn said.

He said typically, sewer extension costs are bonded over the course of over 20 years.

“And if there’s a cost per household of $20,000 — that’s $1,000 per year,” he said. “So any grants we can get really, really help to lower the cost for the residents.”

Kennedy said the town will continue to take additional grants and funding to help pay for the project.

Last year, Brookfield was awarded $300,000 from the Long Island Sound Futures Fund to help the town fund the final design phase, she said.


Stamford reopens two bridges but three others need more work to fix their structural deficiencies

Tyler Fedor

STAMFORD — Two of Stamford's five ailing bridges have reopened: West Glen Drive bridge and Lakeside Drive bridge in Stamford are back in service after being closed over the summer and fall. 

Both bridges were rated "poor" by the Connecticut Department of Transportation and both were closed in the spring for repairs. The CTDOT has 11 rankings for bridge conditions ranging from "failed" at one end to "excellent" at the other.

The "poor" rating is defined as as a bridge with "widespread moderate or isolated major defects; strength and/or performance of the component is affected." 

Stamford taxpayers were not on the hook for repairs to either the West Glen Drive or Lakeside Drive bridges. Eighty percent of the $3.9 million used to replace the Lakeside Drive bridge came from federal funds with the remainder from state funds. The bridge was built in 1936, rebuilt in 1993 and was closed as of April 1 for the most recent upgrade. It opened to traffic Dec. 9.

The West Glen Drive bridge, which was built in 1964, cost $2.1 million to replace and was 80 percent funded by federal funds with the rest covered by state funds. It closed around June 17 and reopened to traffic Dec. 6.

Meanwhile, work is ongoing on other bridges in Stamford. 

The Hunting Ridge Road Bridge, just up the street from LaRocca’s Country Market in North Stamford, is still planned to be opened by June 2025, according to the city’s website as of Dec. 10. 

The goal is to replace the bridge, which was built around 1940, with a structure that can withstand “pressures, velocities, impact and uplift forces from a 100-year flood,” according to the city’s website. 

The state will cover 45 percent of the $3.1 million it will take to replace the bridge, which was rated in “poor” condition by CTDOT. 

The goal to withstand heavy flooding came after an August downpour experts described as a 100-year storm dumped three months worth of rain on southwest Connecticut in just a few hours. That same storm killed two people; more than two dozen streets were washed out or damaged. 

Officials say the bridge on Cedar Heights Road that has been delayed multiple times is aiming to be replaced by the end of April.

The bridge is closed to traffic. A detour takes cars along High Ridge Road and Wire Mill Road. 

The most recent delay of several that have affected the project came after the city discovered the bridge, rated in “serious” condition by CTDOT, was rebuilt too low. Tony Vitti, president of A. Vitti Excavators, which is handling the bridge construction project, said his company will pay to fix the height discrepancy. 

A "serious" grade is defined as a bridge with "major defects; strength and/or performance of the component is seriously affected." A bridge with this grade also calls for "more frequent monitoring, load restrictions and/or corrective actions."  

The original goal was to complete the project by Nov. 30, 2023. Vitti Excavators committed to working during the 2023 winter to get the job done by May 31, 2024. That date was pushed back to June 30. 

The completion date was then pushed back to the end of November after the company submitted documents on handling the flow of the Rippowam River, demolition of the original bridge and supporting utility lines to an inspection firm before moving from one stage of construction to the next. 

The documents went through multiple rounds of reviews that resulted in more delays. 

The Cedar Heights Road bridge is also a detour for a project to replace the Wire Mill Road bridge, so a delay in the Cedar Heights project could delay the Wire Mill Road project. 

The Wire Mill Road bridge replacement must be finished by 2025 or risk losing some or all of the nearly $2 million in federal funds that back the project, City Engineer Lou Casolo previously told The Stamford Advocate.  


AFL-CIO urges activist to resign over opposition to Amazon project on Waterbury-Naugatuck line

 LIVI STANFORD

WATERBURY – The executive board of the state’s AFL-CIO is asking Steve Schrag, a volunteer with the Naugatuck Valley Project, to voluntarily resign from the state’s AFL-CIO Health & Safety Committee because of his vocal opposition to a planned Amazon distribution center on the Waterbury-Naugatuck line.

“Due to your opposition, you endangered the approval of this project, which would provide 1 million work hours for members of the Connecticut Building Trades,” the board wrote in a letter to Schrag on Tuesday. “This project has the potential to create thousands of good paying jobs with strong benefits for Connecticut workers.”

The letter includes a notice for Schrag to cease and desist, halting all actions “opposing projects that would benefit the hardworking members of the Connecticut State Building and Construction Trades Council.”

Ed Hawthorne, president of the AFL-CIO, said he wholeheartedly stood behind the contents of the letter and in full support and solidarity with “the hardworking men and women of the building trades.

“This is an internal matter that will be addressed through the democratic processes of the labor movement,” he said. “I will make no further comment on our internal procedures.”

Waterbury, Naugatuck and Bluewater, the developer of the Amazon facility, entered into an agreement on May 17, 2022, for the new distribution center. The facility would cover 650,000 square feet and stand four-and-a-half stories high, including a two-story parking garage.

Schrag said he was disappointed and confused by the AFL-CIO letter and that he was seeking the appeals process regarding the issue.

But he remained vocal in his opposition to the Amazon project.

“I refuse to let corporations bargain with our health and whether it is health and safety in the workplace or my neighbors there is no negotiating with bargaining with our health,” he said.

He said the project’s location is the last bit of green space Waterbury has left, adding that the project will result in the removal of thousands of trees.

He suggested moving the facility to a more suitable location.

“It would create the same number of jobs and have it right near the highway,” he said. “Why don’t we clean up our brownfields before we tear up our greenfields?”

Mayor Paul K. Pernerewski Jr. said the site on which the planned facility will be built is in an industrial park.

“It was always designated to be a property that was to be developed,” he said, adding that the city has extensive greenspaces including Washington Park, Bunker Hill Park among others that people can enjoy.

He added that the development of the property will bring in 1,000 jobs and millions of money in tax revenue.

He said there is no other parcel of property in the city available to accomodate a facility that large.


Naugatuck seeks additional $3M grant to advance Industrial Park 3 development

 ANDREAS YILMA 

NAUGATUCK – The borough will seek additional state grant funding in combination with town funds to further develop Industrial Park 3.

The state awarded the borough a $3 million Community Investment Fund grant last year to advance the industrial park project – specifically the construction of infrastructure for the property at 280 Elm St.

The borough is applying for another $3 million CIF grant to complete the road network for phase two of the subdivision of the 86.5-acre parcel.

Lanxess Corp., a successor to Uniroyal, owned the site until it sold most of the land to the borough three years ago for $1 in a remediated condition with brownfield protection for all future purchasers.

Lanxess retained about 9 acres for its two buildings. The Lanxess site is accessed by a driveway with an easement over the borough’s property that has been subdivided after land use approval.

“Our entire effort in this project is designed to finish, get the site back on the tax rolls and take a nonproducing piece of property and turn into once again one of our better producing properties in the entire borough,” said Mayor N. Warren “Pete” Hess, the project manager at a Dec. 3 public information hearing at Town Hall.

Lanxess has spent $20 to $30 million for remediation, while the borough’s obligation is to cap the site, manage the soils and develop the property under a stewardship permit, Hess said.

This is one of the borough’s top priority projects to get the grand list back in shape where “Naugatuck has a significant amount of skin in the game” as it’s putting up a $7 million match for phase one and two combined which will come from local Tax Incremental Financing, Hess said.

The town has already spent an additional $1 million of town funds for the design and engineering of the subdivision, Hess added.

A lumber company has already begun to expand in the phase one of the industrial park with the construction of two buildings. International Supply has $8 million in lumber that it will store on site, where they will build warehousing and some assembly areas, Hess said.

“We’re working with labor unions and trade unions to allow our high school students and other members of the community to get jobs and to get paid while they are learning the trades and we have a great partnership with our labor unions,” Hess said. “We’re really trying to create some better jobs not just for our residents who are here now but for people who want to come to Naugatuck and want to move into our new residential project which is downtown.”

This project is alignment with the Gov. Ned Lamont’s economic action plan created a few years ago. Conservative estimates show job creation rates of about 600 jobs for phase one and two. If the borough were to receive another $3 million for phase two, for a total of $6 million, that would come out to a $10,000 state investment per job created. The state has historically spent more than that, Goeway added.

The Board of Mayor and Burgesses approved a contract for Industrial Park III – Phase I site work and utilities with Guerrera Construction Co. of Oxford for $5.8 million.

Hess said the bid will be awarded to Guerrera, but Torrington-based O&G Industries is the borough’s construction manager and will issue the bids and be responsible for managing the job. The contract will be signed after approval from the state Department of Economic and Community Development.

The construction of the new road network on the upper portion of the industrial park will consist of new utilities. The borough has already completed some storm-water drainage repairs through Cherry Street. The will help that street and Hunters Mountain Road divert water through the industrial park to the Naugatuck River, Hess said.

“This is going to be a job creator and a significant job creator for the Naugatuck Valley region because we’re on the train line,” Goeway said. “It’s not just going to be for Naugatuck residents, it’s going to be for valley residents as a whole and Naugatuck specifically is really special because we have the workforce that’s ready to train, is capable of learning and is ready to fill these open positions that will come.”


December 16, 2024

CT Construction Digest Monday December 16, 2024

New Norwalk High and South Norwalk School take shape, with construction on schedule: 'Very exciting'

Kalleen Rose Ozanic

NORWALK — Construction is on schedule at the sites of the new Norwalk High School and South Norwalk School, although it's not certain if the latter will have solar panels or open in fall 2025 as expected.

The new Norwalk High School project has a longer construction timeline than the South Norwalk School. Site grading and the foundation is complete at the site of the new high school, said Alan Lo, Norwalk building and facilities manager. The foundation for the school’s swimming pool is being tested to ensure it is watertight, he said. 

The new Norwalk High School is slated to welcome students in fall 2027, with the new sports complex atop the bones of the old school to be completed by August 2028, Lo said. The school’s tennis courts will come soon after in the fall of 2028, he said. In the meantime, "many" athletic programs have been displaced during construction, according to an FAQ page for the project.

The district has busing plans to bring student athletes to other sports spaces during the construction, Norwalk Public Schools Media Relations Specialist Emily Morgan said this year.

At the South Norwalk School construction site, the building is framed out and interior partitions and masonry are being installed, Lo said.

“It’s very exciting,” the building and facilities manager said. Lo said he can't confirm until April that the school's construction will have come far enough along to welcome students on time.

"I know we are scheduled to open (on time), assuming that everything (continues) to go smoothly," Lo said.

Nevertheless, the South Norwalk School's roof is being installed soon, he said last Tuesday. But whether solar panels will actually go on that roof is unclear. Last summer, officials had hoped the school could be entirely solar-powered. If the school ends up having solar panels on the roof, they will actually provide a maximum of 30 percent of the school’s peak energy usage, Lo said.

He spoke to the city’s Land Use and Building Management Committee and the Facilities committee of the school board this month about how the intended partnership with South Norwalk Electric and Water to implement ground mounted and rooftop solar panels wasn't feasible. SNEW and Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative, of which the utility company is a member, found energy savings from the solar project wouldn't break even on the costs of a 20-year power purchasing agreement, according to Lo and a memo provided to the committees.

In a power purchasing agreement, a “third-party developer installs, owns, and operates an energy system on a customer’s property,” according to Better Buildings of the United States Department of Energy.

Because the school is located within SNEW’s “electric service boundaries,” the memo states, Lo said that a power purchase agreement cannot work without the utility company. 

The city purchasing panels and hiring a contractor is the only way to install them on the school's roof, Lo said. If leftover funds are available after the South Norwalk School construction is completed, the city could use it to buy solar panels and engage a contractor to install them, Lo said. He estimated this would cost $800,000.

Should the cost of the panels and contractor exceed any potential leftover funds by the school’s completion, a capital request could be made to further fund the solar project.

Those possibilities hinge on financial calculations Lo said he would complete by September 2025 to determine if the city funding the solar project is financially feasible.

Despite the uncertainty, Lo said that the city has a “commitment” to rooftop solar and looks to use the option wherever possible. He pointed out completed solar panel projects at Jefferson Marine Science Elementary School, Ponus Ridge STEAM Academy, Naramake Elementary School, and a solar project at Cranbury Elementary School that he said would be completed in the spring. 

Regardless, any solar would not be installed at South Norwalk until spring 2026 after it’s clear the school’s roof is stable, without leaks, and ready for installation, Lo said.


Brookfield awarded $1.5 million toward sewer installation at almost 100 homes

Sandra Diamond Fox

BROOKFIELD — The town recently received a grant that will go toward helping install sewer systems for nearly 100 homes while also protecting the Long Island Sound.

The $1.5 million grant, awarded through the Long Island Sound Futures Fund, will go to the town’s Water Pollution Control Authority for construction of a sewer extension in the Dean and Pocono Road area, said Alison Kennedy, operations manager of the Brookfield Water Pollution Control Authority.

“We have some properties along that road whose septic systems are not doing well,” Brookfield First Selectman Steve Dunn said. “They’re all working but some are on their last legs.”

Kennedy said the extension will serve 91 residential homes and possibly the Town Hall campus. A complete design of the project is anticipated by July 2025.

She said by replacing the septic systems with sewer, the town will be eliminating a lot of nitrogen and phosphorus from entering the Housatonic Watershed, in addition to any E. coli contamination of surface water.

“All of these nutrients going into the Still River in the Housatonic Watershed eventually feed the Long Island Sound,” she said. “So the reduction of nutrients would help the Long Island Sound be a healthier environment.”

The $1.5 million is the maximum award of the grant, and the town’s match for the grant is $750,000, to total $2.25 million, Kennedy added.

The Long Island Sound Futures Fund said the project will reduce 34 pounds of nitrogen, 24 pounds of phosphorus, and the potential risks to public health and wildlife habitats due to water quality issues.

Dunn said he’s very pleased with the grant award.

“This has been under consideration for a few years now. We’re very thankful that we got a grant,” he said.

“Overall, this really helps to build a sewer system along the Still River Greenway to protect the Still River and make it much more affordable for the residents,” he added.

The Long Island Futures Fund project grant has been awarded through the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, in partnership with the Long Island Sound Study and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Thirty-one new grants totaling $12.5 million were awarded, according to its website.

The Futures Fund "supports efforts to address sewage pollution by providing grants which test innovative approaches to conservation, deliver transformative projects and support people and communities who value the sound and take a direct role in its future," according to its website.

'Two different sewer alternatives'

The town is in the final design phase of the project, Kennedy said.

“Our engineers are bringing the final design two different sewer alternatives —  one would be a full gravity system and one would be a low pressure system,” said Kennedy.

She said the town will decide which of those systems it will choose. She added much of that will be dependent on costs as well.

Depending on which system is used, the cost will be between $3.4 million and $6.7 million, Dunn said.

He said typically, sewer extension costs are bonded over the course of over 20 years.

“And if there’s a cost per household of $20,000 — that’s $1,000 per year,” he said. “So any grants we can get really, really help to lower the cost for the residents.”

Kennedy said the town will continue to take additional grants and funding to help pay for the project.

Last year, Brookfield was awarded $300,000 from the Long Island Sound Futures Fund to help the town fund the final design phase, she said.


Stamford reopens two bridges but three others need more work to fix their structural deficiencies

Tyler Fedor

STAMFORD — Two of Stamford's five ailing bridges have reopened: West Glen Drive bridge and Lakeside Drive bridge in Stamford are back in service after being closed over the summer and fall. 

Both bridges were rated "poor" by the Connecticut Department of Transportation and both were closed in the spring for repairs. The CTDOT has 11 rankings for bridge conditions ranging from "failed" at one end to "excellent" at the other.

The "poor" rating is defined as as a bridge with "widespread moderate or isolated major defects; strength and/or performance of the component is affected." 

Stamford taxpayers were not on the hook for repairs to either the West Glen Drive or Lakeside Drive bridges. Eighty percent of the $3.9 million used to replace the Lakeside Drive bridge came from federal funds with the remainder from state funds. The bridge was built in 1936, rebuilt in 1993 and was closed as of April 1 for the most recent upgrade. It opened to traffic Dec. 9.

The West Glen Drive bridge, which was built in 1964, cost $2.1 million to replace and was 80 percent funded by federal funds with the rest covered by state funds. It closed around June 17 and reopened to traffic Dec. 6.

Meanwhile, work is ongoing on other bridges in Stamford. 

The Hunting Ridge Road Bridge, just up the street from LaRocca’s Country Market in North Stamford, is still planned to be opened by June 2025, according to the city’s website as of Dec. 10. 

The goal is to replace the bridge, which was built around 1940, with a structure that can withstand “pressures, velocities, impact and uplift forces from a 100-year flood,” according to the city’s website. 

The state will cover 45 percent of the $3.1 million it will take to replace the bridge, which was rated in “poor” condition by CTDOT. 

The goal to withstand heavy flooding came after an August downpour experts described as a 100-year storm dumped three months worth of rain on southwest Connecticut in just a few hours. That same storm killed two people; more than two dozen streets were washed out or damaged. 

Officials say the bridge on Cedar Heights Road that has been delayed multiple times is aiming to be replaced by the end of April.

The bridge is closed to traffic. A detour takes cars along High Ridge Road and Wire Mill Road. 

The most recent delay of several that have affected the project came after the city discovered the bridge, rated in “serious” condition by CTDOT, was rebuilt too low. Tony Vitti, president of A. Vitti Excavators, which is handling the bridge construction project, said his company will pay to fix the height discrepancy. 

A "serious" grade is defined as a bridge with "major defects; strength and/or performance of the component is seriously affected." A bridge with this grade also calls for "more frequent monitoring, load restrictions and/or corrective actions."  

The original goal was to complete the project by Nov. 30, 2023. Vitti Excavators committed to working during the 2023 winter to get the job done by May 31, 2024. That date was pushed back to June 30. 

The completion date was then pushed back to the end of November after the company submitted documents on handling the flow of the Rippowam River, demolition of the original bridge and supporting utility lines to an inspection firm before moving from one stage of construction to the next. 

The documents went through multiple rounds of reviews that resulted in more delays. 

The Cedar Heights Road bridge is also a detour for a project to replace the Wire Mill Road bridge, so a delay in the Cedar Heights project could delay the Wire Mill Road project. 

The Wire Mill Road bridge replacement must be finished by 2025 or risk losing some or all of the nearly $2 million in federal funds that back the project, City Engineer Lou Casolo previously told The Stamford Advocate.  


AFL-CIO urges activist to resign over opposition to Amazon project on Waterbury-Naugatuck line

 LIVI STANFORD

WATERBURY – The executive board of the state’s AFL-CIO is asking Steve Schrag, a volunteer with the Naugatuck Valley Project, to voluntarily resign from the state’s AFL-CIO Health & Safety Committee because of his vocal opposition to a planned Amazon distribution center on the Waterbury-Naugatuck line.

“Due to your opposition, you endangered the approval of this project, which would provide 1 million work hours for members of the Connecticut Building Trades,” the board wrote in a letter to Schrag on Tuesday. “This project has the potential to create thousands of good paying jobs with strong benefits for Connecticut workers.”

The letter includes a notice for Schrag to cease and desist, halting all actions “opposing projects that would benefit the hardworking members of the Connecticut State Building and Construction Trades Council.”

Ed Hawthorne, president of the AFL-CIO, said he wholeheartedly stood behind the contents of the letter and in full support and solidarity with “the hardworking men and women of the building trades.

“This is an internal matter that will be addressed through the democratic processes of the labor movement,” he said. “I will make no further comment on our internal procedures.”

Waterbury, Naugatuck and Bluewater, the developer of the Amazon facility, entered into an agreement on May 17, 2022, for the new distribution center. The facility would cover 650,000 square feet and stand four-and-a-half stories high, including a two-story parking garage.

Schrag said he was disappointed and confused by the AFL-CIO letter and that he was seeking the appeals process regarding the issue.

But he remained vocal in his opposition to the Amazon project.

“I refuse to let corporations bargain with our health and whether it is health and safety in the workplace or my neighbors there is no negotiating with bargaining with our health,” he said.

He said the project’s location is the last bit of green space Waterbury has left, adding that the project will result in the removal of thousands of trees.

He suggested moving the facility to a more suitable location.

“It would create the same number of jobs and have it right near the highway,” he said. “Why don’t we clean up our brownfields before we tear up our greenfields?”

Mayor Paul K. Pernerewski Jr. said the site on which the planned facility will be built is in an industrial park.

“It was always designated to be a property that was to be developed,” he said, adding that the city has extensive greenspaces including Washington Park, Bunker Hill Park among others that people can enjoy.

He added that the development of the property will bring in 1,000 jobs and millions of money in tax revenue.

He said there is no other parcel of property in the city available to accomodate a facility that large.


Naugatuck seeks additional $3M grant to advance Industrial Park 3 development

 ANDREAS YILMA 

NAUGATUCK – The borough will seek additional state grant funding in combination with town funds to further develop Industrial Park 3.

The state awarded the borough a $3 million Community Investment Fund grant last year to advance the industrial park project – specifically the construction of infrastructure for the property at 280 Elm St.

The borough is applying for another $3 million CIF grant to complete the road network for phase two of the subdivision of the 86.5-acre parcel.

Lanxess Corp., a successor to Uniroyal, owned the site until it sold most of the land to the borough three years ago for $1 in a remediated condition with brownfield protection for all future purchasers.

Lanxess retained about 9 acres for its two buildings. The Lanxess site is accessed by a driveway with an easement over the borough’s property that has been subdivided after land use approval.

“Our entire effort in this project is designed to finish, get the site back on the tax rolls and take a nonproducing piece of property and turn into once again one of our better producing properties in the entire borough,” said Mayor N. Warren “Pete” Hess, the project manager at a Dec. 3 public information hearing at Town Hall.

Lanxess has spent $20 to $30 million for remediation, while the borough’s obligation is to cap the site, manage the soils and develop the property under a stewardship permit, Hess said.

This is one of the borough’s top priority projects to get the grand list back in shape where “Naugatuck has a significant amount of skin in the game” as it’s putting up a $7 million match for phase one and two combined which will come from local Tax Incremental Financing, Hess said.

The town has already spent an additional $1 million of town funds for the design and engineering of the subdivision, Hess added.

A lumber company has already begun to expand in the phase one of the industrial park with the construction of two buildings. International Supply has $8 million in lumber that it will store on site, where they will build warehousing and some assembly areas, Hess said.

“We’re working with labor unions and trade unions to allow our high school students and other members of the community to get jobs and to get paid while they are learning the trades and we have a great partnership with our labor unions,” Hess said. “We’re really trying to create some better jobs not just for our residents who are here now but for people who want to come to Naugatuck and want to move into our new residential project which is downtown.”

This project is alignment with the Gov. Ned Lamont’s economic action plan created a few years ago. Conservative estimates show job creation rates of about 600 jobs for phase one and two. If the borough were to receive another $3 million for phase two, for a total of $6 million, that would come out to a $10,000 state investment per job created. The state has historically spent more than that, Goeway added.

The Board of Mayor and Burgesses approved a contract for Industrial Park III – Phase I site work and utilities with Guerrera Construction Co. of Oxford for $5.8 million.

Hess said the bid will be awarded to Guerrera, but Torrington-based O&G Industries is the borough’s construction manager and will issue the bids and be responsible for managing the job. The contract will be signed after approval from the state Department of Economic and Community Development.

The construction of the new road network on the upper portion of the industrial park will consist of new utilities. The borough has already completed some storm-water drainage repairs through Cherry Street. The will help that street and Hunters Mountain Road divert water through the industrial park to the Naugatuck River, Hess said.

“This is going to be a job creator and a significant job creator for the Naugatuck Valley region because we’re on the train line,” Goeway said. “It’s not just going to be for Naugatuck residents, it’s going to be for valley residents as a whole and Naugatuck specifically is really special because we have the workforce that’s ready to train, is capable of learning and is ready to fill these open positions that will come.”


December 13, 2024

CT Construction Digest Friday December 13, 2024

State unveils dashboard to track Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funds

Brandon Whiting

State officials recently unveiled an Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Dashboard, to help Connecticut residents visualize how and where over half of the $6.4 billion in Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) funds the state has received will be allocated. Per the dashboard, passenger and freight rail projects represent the largest recipient of federal funds, with roads, bridges and other major projects coming in second.

The dashboard was published by Connecticut Open Data, the state’s open data website published by the Office of Policy and Management’s (OPM) Data and Policy Analytics unit, and gives both a sector-by-sector and project-by-project breakdown of how these funds are being spent, as well as a map to show which counties received the most funding. 

While the dashboard does not give a complete picture of the state’s BIL fund allocation, with only about $3.7 billion worth of the total $6.4 billion in projects being included, state officials intend to update it over time.

“Many more projects will be added in the coming months, as funding opportunities become grant awards and as formula funds become specific projects,” reads the dashboard. “By reaching communities across Connecticut – including rural communities and historically underserved populations – the law makes critical investments that will improve the lives of Connecticut residents and position the state for success.”

Of the $3.7 billion mapped on the dashboard, a little over $2 billion, or about 54% of the mapped funds, were granted for rail projects, and approximately $1.28 billion, or about 35%, were granted for roads, bridges and other major projects. The funding accounted for other categories was minuscule in comparison; the categories of ports and waterways, public transport projects, and environmental remediation projects each received 2% of the funds respectively, while the categories of airports and federal aviation, clean energy and power projects, water, environmental resilience projects, safety projects and two miscellaneous projects, received less than 2% of the funds respectively.

In total, 497 BIL-funded projects focus on transportation, 53 are climate-related, two are broadband-related, and another two are listed as “other”; one “other” item is funding for the instruction of smart manufacturing college courses, and another is for a fish-passage project in Naugatuck Valley.

When looking at a project-by-project breakdown of the funds, the state’s five biggest items are all rail-related projects. The single largest recipient of federal funds is the replacement of the Connecticut River Bridge ($826.65 million). Coming in second place is the replacement of the Norwalk River Bridge ($465 million), third is the Devon Bridge replacement in Milford ($245.92 million), fourth is the repair of the Gold Star Memorial Bridge in Groton ($158 million) and fifth is the New Haven Line Power Improvement Program ($122.8 million).

As for the geographic breakdown of BIL spending, the majority of projects on the dashboard are located in Connecticut’s largest metropolitan areas. Hartford was the area with the most BIL-funded projects, having 22. Rounding out the top five are Norwalk, with 21 projects, Stamford, with 20, New Haven, with 18, and Waterbury, with 17.

Despite the concentration of projects in cities, the vast majority of Connecticut’s counties received BIL funding for at least one project. Only the towns of North Branford, Orange, Woodbridge, Ansonia, Bethany, Beacon Falls, Prospect, Wolcott, New Hartford and Canaan had zero BIL-funded projects mapped.

Tiffany Thiele, Director of Communications for the state’s Department of Revenue Services, noted the limitations of the mapping however, stating that some multi-community projects have not yet been represented by the dashboard.

“The current data map does not include an exhaustive list of BIL/IIJA Projects and allocations,” said Thiele. “It contains projects that are easy to map with available data. Multi-town or regional projects are not currently on the data map. We are continuously updating the data story as more projects become mappable.”


Waterbury readying to demolish aged eyesore

LIVI STANFORD

WATERBURY- The city is moving closer to razing the former Bristol Babcock industrial complex, which has remained an eyesore and a safety hazard.

The Board of Aldermen will vote Monday on hiring a licensed environmental professional from Tighe and Bond for $244,429.

Tommy Hyde, executive director of Waterbury Development Corp., said once the professional is hired, demo specifications will be taken and the city will be able to go out to bid for the demolition, which is targeted for early next year.

The demolition will be followed by an investigation of the site for contaminants and a cleanup, Hyde said.

The city will need to apply for more funding to remediate the site, he noted. The State Bond Commission approved $4 million Aug. 8.

Overall, the city has $5 million for the site, including $1 million from developer Norm S. Drubner in October 2023 to take the title of the 6.6-acre former industrial complex.

“This is a property that the surrounding community has been very vocal about since I started this job,” Hyde said. “I am happy and excited that before my departure we are going to be able to get the ball rolling on cleaning up the site.”

Hyde will be resigning from WDC to become chief of staff for AdvanceCT.

Mayor Paul K. Pernerewski Jr. said housing for ages 55 and older could be a use for the property when it is redeveloped, but that will depend on “how dirty it is, how clean we can get it, and what the standards are going to be for residents and multifamily residential units with the change in the regulations that are pending. We also want to have conversations with the community in that area to determine what they might want to see as well.”

Bristol Babcock Co. employed hundreds at one time and was a leader in the manufacture of electronic gauges and measuring devices, as well as sonar. It also is credited with producing one of the first full-length talking motion pictures. In 1986, Drubner paid $3 million to acquire the Bristol Street property, and Bristol Babcock moved to Watertown.

Drubner hoped to renovate the building and transform it into apartments overlooking the Naugatuck River. He received a zone change for such a development, but a mortgage crisis in the early 1990s foiled his plan. On Aug. 13, 2015, a fire broke out at the property, leading to part of the building collapsing onto Bristol Street. Drubner said he removed that part of the building for safety reasons, but the cost of remediating the contamination became prohibitive, making it impossible to redevelop.

The Bristol Babcock property contains four interconnected buildings at 40 Bristol St. in the city’s Platts Mill neighborhood near the Naugatuck line. The property has been deteriorating since the 1980s and has remained vacant since 2002. On Oct. 24, the Board of Aldermen approved acquiring the vacant brownfield.


New London sewer agreement puts pressure on Old Lyme

Elizabeth Regan

Old Lyme — With an agreement again in place for New London to accept wastewater from four beach communities here, local officials are continuing their constipated effort to build the sewer system necessary to get it there.

The new 20-year agreement, approved by the New London City Council and signed by Mayor Michael Passero earlier this month, is with the Miami Beach Association, Old Lyme Shores Beach Association, Old Colony Beach Association, the town of Old Lyme and associated water pollution control authorities.

The contract requires construction of the new sewer system to begin within 18 months. If that doesn’t happen, the beach associations and the town will remain responsible for their portion of the $1.58 million connection fee outlined in the contract.

Meanwhile, opposition continues from some residents of the affected beach communities who are balking at their share of the estimated $53 million cost — including an Old Lyme Shores contingent that prompted leaders there to put the project on hold.

A previous version of the contract expired in 2023 after five years because the Old Lyme sewer system didn’t come to fruition. Plans to build a shared pump station and pressurized pipe went out to bid multiple times, but costs came in higher than the amount authorized by residents at referendum.

Officials have blamed pandemic-related supply chain disruptions and inflation for dramatically increasing the project’s cost. Now, the shared project is set to go out to bid again within the next few weeks, according to Old Lyme Water Pollution Control Authority Chairman Steve Cinami.

The effort is the result of a mandate from the state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) going back more than 10 years for the beach communities to reduce groundwater pollution and the potential for pollutants entering Long Island Sound.

Amid the escalating costs and fear from residents about their ability to bear the cost, the DEEP this year promised grant funding and a forgivable loan that local officials have said would amount to $19.3 million.

The beach associations and the town eventually will pay treatment costs based on the amount of sewage being treated in New London. The current rate is $2.50 per 1,000 gallons of sewage processed but that rate fluctuates. The contract also calls for the beach associations to pay 1.2 percent of annual treatment plant capital costs and the town to pay 0.5%.

The contract allows the beach associations to send up to 120,000 gallons of sewage per day and the town to send up to 50,000. They have the right to purchase up to an additional 130,000 gallons per day as more people in the beach communities tie into the system.

Cinami said he anticipates bids will be received by the end of January. He said officials then have 60 days to award the contract, “and then construction could start.”

New London Water & Water Pollution Control Authority Chairman Barry Weiner said requiring the start of construction within 18 months was a key negotiation point in the contract.

“It is significant that we’re reserving capacity, which is quite valuable, and we just needed some kind of assurance that the project would actually get off the ground,” he said. “We just could not be in a position to hold that capacity forever, with no end in sight.”


Old Lyme Shores on hold

Former Old Lyme Shores Beach Association Water Pollution Control Authority Chairman Timothy Larson, who was appointed this summer and resigned this fall, on Thursday said he had been trying to schedule a vote on a revised bonding request when resistance from a “vocal minority” led him and association Board of Governors President Diane Duhaime to put the effort on hold.

Duhaime also resigned as board president.

Larson said association members initially authorized spending around $9 million on the sewer project but this summer estimates put Old Lyme Shores’ portion of the total sewer system cost at $12 million. Larson emphasized the state funding will reimburse the association for about half the cost.

But Larson said the association would have to borrow closer to $16 million to also fix buckling roads and address stormwater runoff issues.

The association, with its 193 homes and cottages, comprises 21% of the overall sewer system project. That means it is responsible for $330,779 of the $1.58 million connection fee, even if the project does not happen.

“We warned people that we still had these bills to pay,” he said. “If we don’t hook up, we’re still going to have to pay the city of New London for our piece of this project.”

Larson, a former state lawmaker and mayor of East Hartford, said he joined the Water Pollution Control Authority because there was a need for members and he wanted to help. But behavior from opponents of the project, which he described as “vile and insulting,” led him to resign.

“We’re going to have to sort this out relatively quickly, otherwise we lose (state funding) and we still end up with these obligations, whether we’re hooked up or not,” he said.

Cinami, the Old Lyme Water Pollution Control Authority chairman, was hopeful that seeking bids on the project would provide more up-to-date information about its cost and that could help the Old Lyme Shores association reassure its members about the true cost.

Even if Old Lyme Shores does not approve funding for its share of the project, it would still be required by the DEEP to address its pollution problems.

“In the whole scheme of things, I believe Old Lyme Shores will be putting in sewers on or around the same time as we do,” he said. “It’s unprecedented that the state has given 50% funding. I don’t think they would want to lose that.”

'Who knows?'

Cinami, a construction contractor, said he expects bids to come in more favorably than they did previously.

“This is probably the best bidding climate for owners in the last 10 years,” he said. “Pricing is not on an inflated trajectory. It’s on a steady or slightly deflating trajectory. Contractors are looking for work, so they’re more aggressive in their bidding than they probably have been.”

He said Old Colony Beach Club Association has gotten state permission to go out to bid for its individual portion of the project, which includes the infrastructure necessary to get sewage from member homes to the pump station and beyond. He added that the town of Old Lyme was set to submit to the state its request for approval to bid out the Sound View neighborhood portion of the project on Friday.

Cinami said the town’s bond counsel has advised him there will not have to be another townwide referendum on the project if bids come in as anticipated. That’s because the amount the town will be responsible for is beneath the $9.5 million threshold voters approved in 2019.

Scott Boulanger, a member of the Miami Beach Association Board of Governors and chairman of the Old Lyme Federation of Beaches, emphasized going out to bid on the shared portion of the project is the most important hurdle to overcome.

“Once we get the bids in and look at them, I think we’re going to get a better idea if this project is going to need additional funding or if we’ve got to figure out another alternative plan,” he said.

He said he was optimistic bids would not come in higher than project officials’ latest estimates, which are based on the lowest bid received in 2021 plus a 25% escalation.

“There’s a good chance, come this spring, we could see somebody actually doing work,” he said. “But who knows?



December 12, 2024

CT Construction Digest Thursday December 12, 2024

Fight Over Planned Decadelong Leveling of Mount Decatur Comes to a Head in Ledyard

Francisco Uranga

GALES FERRY — Months of tense hearings and court-like drama before the town’s Planning and Zoning Commission will wrap up Dec. 19, but the fault lines are evident between advocates of a large-scale excavation and development, on the one hand, and neighbors fiercely opposed to a project they say will lower nearby property values and their quality of life.

Neighbors of a proposed decadelong project to level the north side of Mount Decatur, sell off 3.6 million cubic yards of rock, and flatten the parcel into 26 acres of land suitable for industrial development say the site work amounts to a quarrying operation — an activity banned from the town since 1975.

Developer Gales Ferry Intermodal, owned by Massachusetts-based Jay Cashman Inc., has pitched the plan as a money-maker for the town that’s appropriate for the industrial-zoned property. 

The company has the support of Ledyard Mayor Fred Allyn III. 

GFI has applied for a special permit allowing the company to grade the site and blast the north side of the 256-foot-high Mount Decatur, also known as Dragon Hill. The company has proposed a 10-year excavation during which it would cart off and sell the granite rock to prepare the site for development afterward.

Some neighbors say they doubt the company intends to develop the parcel.

But Allyn told CT Examiner in late November that he supported the project for its expected fiscal impact.

“This is a town that has a very low tax base. We have more than 95% of our property is either residentially zoned or residentially used,” he said. “When we have an opportunity to bring in an industrial user or a commercial user that would increase our tax base, I have to welcome it.”

Allyn also defended the project as appropriate for the property’s industrial zoning.

“When you buy a home adjacent to an industrially zoned property, that’s something you have to be aware of,” he said. “And just because somebody may not be using that property to its maximal capacity, doesn’t mean it’s not gonna happen at some later point in time.”

However, according to Donald Poland, a consultant with Goman and York hired by Ledyard to estimate the economic and fiscal impact of the project, the town will have to wait until at least year 13 of the project to see the benefit, when the land is redeveloped and the slated industrial buildings are constructed. 

At a public hearing in November, Poland told commissioners that the property value had fallen since Dow Chemicals closed in 2015 and part of the facility was torn down. 

He estimated the planned investments would increase annual tax collections on the property from $20,000 to $1.3 million.

In the meantime, Cashman has offered to pay the town $0.25 per cubic yard of rock in lieu of taxes until new facilities are constructed. 

Poland estimated that the company would cart away nearly 3.6 million cubic yards of rock, allowing the town to pocket $892,500 over a decade.

Poland labeled opposition to the project “not-in-my-backyard syndrome.”

Bruce Edwards, a neighbor, hadn’t forgotten that comment.

“NIMBYs have a connotation of somebody objecting to something without a fair reason. We are not NIMBYs,” Edwards told CT Examiner. “Now, do you want to say not a quarry in my backyard? I’m OK with that.”

The critics

At a hearing last Thursday at Ledyard Middle School, Eric Treaster, a former chair of the Planning and Zoning Commission and current member of the Zoning Board of Appeals, offered a list of 22 reasons why the commission should reject the proposal.

Treaster argued that the project is a quarry, even if the proposal only refers to an excavation permit. He outlined a series of additional concerns shared by many nearby residents, among them the impact on traffic, vibration, noise and exposure to cancer-causing silica dust.

Critics also warned that the project risked damaging Fort Decatur, where Commodore Stephen Decatur hid during the War of 1812.

The company signed an agreement in early December with the State Historic Preservation Office to donate the 3.4 acres where Fort Decatur is located to the nonprofit Archeological Conservancy and committed to donating an additional 5.9 acres if its project receives the necessary approvals.

The proposal doesn’t include permits for any buildings, which must be requested in a separate application, but the company presented a conceptual development plan for its 165-acre Gales Ferry property in February 2023. The plan envisioned 26,000 square feet of equipment maintenance facilities on the north side of the property and four buildings totaling 260,000 square feet of industrial rental facilities on the south side, the part to be leveled by excavation.

An earlier proposal to use the property to temporarily store dredge materials was put on hold after initial meetings with state regulators.

Cashman speaks

Company President Jay Cashman told CT Examiner he bought the property because he saw the potential for industrial development given the access to deep water, freight rail and state roads. He also denied that the project was a quarry.

“In a quarry, basically, you come to a grade and then you dig down,” he said. “If it’s material with no commercial value, it’ll cost you to clear it. If you’ve got a product with commercial value, you could get your land leveled off for free or you can make a little bit of money.”

Cashman said he intended to redevelop the Gales Ferry property and build industrial space as the company had in East Boston and Quincy, Massachusetts. He said his company had already been fielding interest in the property from possible tenants including SouthCoast Wind, a bidder in the recent tristate wind energy auction

“Believe in the town’s experts, believe in the state agencies. Trust in the checks and balances,” he said. “That’s the biggest protection anybody has.”

He also pledged to compensate neighbors for any losses in property value.

Cashman said he planned to offer residents a “property value guarantee,” which he also offered when developing wind farms in Maine. If a homeowner was unable to sell a property at its appraised value, Cashman said he would offer up the difference or buy the home. 

He said he hadn’t pitched the idea earlier during the public hearing process so that his intentions would not be misunderstood as an effort to win residents’ support through money.

But given that the commission had approved the Baldwin Hill project, a similar excavation in the same area, Cashman said he was confident in the outcome. 

“They gave him a permit about a year and a half ago, so I don’t see how they can deny it to us,” he said. “He’s a lot closer to other residents than we are.”

‘They have already disrupted the community’

Edwards lives a few miles south of the GFI property. 

From his back windows, he can see a stretch of the Thames River where it narrows before making an eastward bend at Mount Decatur. He can also see the Montville power plant on the far embankment.

While on his boat one morning in late November, Edwards explained why he believed Cashman’s project would destroy the calm of the neighborhood.

“Cashman would like you to think it’s industrial and it was industrial before, so they’re the same,” said Bruce Edward. “If they were the same, they wouldn’t get objections.”  (CT Examiner)

He acknowledged the neighborhood had been ringed for decades with industrial facilities, but argued that the proposal wasn’t just more of the same.

“Cashman would like you to think it’s industrial and it was industrial before, so they’re the same,” he said. “If they were the same, they wouldn’t get objections.” 

Edwards, who has lived in town since 1965, warned that the project would disrupt the long-term recovery of the Thames Valley Estuary. 

Edwards said he used to swim as a child in the river, not realizing it was polluted, drinking beers as a youth on the rocks in front of the naval submarine base where his father worked. 

Today, he said he often his pilots his boat off Mount Decatur to photograph bald eagles.

“We have American bald eagles along here, which are protected species,” he said, pointing to the mountain. “I photographed eagles right out here, but they are kind of pretty tricky when it comes to cameras.”

Like other Gales Ferry residents who testified at the hearings, Edwards spent hours studying the project, learning the details and sharing concerns with his neighbors.

At last Thursday’s hearing, he emphasized the physical effort of attending every meeting, which collectively total over 28 hours since September. This week will be the last chance for neighbors to testify. Attorneys for both sides — Harry Heller for Cashman and Wilson Carroll for the opposition — will speak at the final meeting on Dec. 19. 

“We put time into this and we don’t get paid to do it,” Edwards said. “They say the project is not going to disrupt this community. They have already disrupted the community without being given a permit.”

Project support

Testimony in favor of the project came mostly from the business community and GFI.

Chamber of Commerce of Eastern Connecticut President Tony Sheridan supports the project, as does John Fuller who runs a radio station in Ledyard, and former Ledyard Planning Commission Chair Mike Cherry.

Kevin Blacker, for years a vocal opponent of efforts to stage offshore wind off State Pier, also supports Cashman. 

Blacker said he admired Cashman as an entrepreneur and saw it as a positive to have someone like him in the area.

“He is the type of person that believes anything is possible,” Blacker told CT Examiner. “That’s like the most American thing that I can think of and I love it.”

Commission Chair Marty Wood tried to maintain equanimity throughout the hearing discussion, which proved challenging. More than once, Wood warned that he would suspend the hearings in response to shouting directed at Cashman’s attorney. 

Jim Kelly, a neighbor who opposes the project, summed up the dilemma.

“Somebody’s gonna get sued here. And from everything that I’ve seen, I’d rather have GFI suing the town than have the residents suing the town,” he said. “Because I think we have a much stronger case.”


Wallingford moves forward to bring data centers to town

Christian Metzger

WALLINGFORD — Technological development may be part of Wallingford’s economic future, as the Planning & Zoning Commission voted to allow for data centers in the Watershed Interchange District - an area set aside for low-intensity tech-based businesses.

This comes at the end of a three-month hearing brought forward by Charter Development Group LLC, who is seeking to develop a mid-sized data center within the district just behind the Hilton Garden Inn at 1181 Barnes Road. 

Subject to a special permit, the approved regulations specify architectural considerations to reduce disturbances to the nearby residents, and now requires design analysis from an acoustic engineer to reduce potential low-frequency noise from generators and equipment. 

With many residents having expressed environmental concerns from the proposed center, as it sits directly on the watershed to the vital MacKenzie Reservoir, the center can only use water supplied from the town’s water system, rather from drawing or discharging into the nearby Muddy River and will have a comprehensive response plan in case of spills or other environmental hazards. 

While there were some concerns from members regarding the power draw that such a facility would have, officials from Wallingford’s electric division stated that the overall draw wouldn’t have an impact on residents' rates or service - though some agreement with Eversource would likely be required depending on the needs of the center.

The size of the buildings would also be capped with the approved amendment, with the size of buildings limited to 250,000 square feet. There seemed to be some room for flexibility within this, however, as representatives of the group stated interest in building a 300,000 square foot structure if certain parameters were met to the satisfaction of the commission, but said they could make due with the smaller footprint if it made it more palatable for residents and officials.  

Overall, the members of the development group expressed an openness to collaborate with the commission to come to a resolution that would make the data center possible and acceptable to the town, taking into account criticism of a much larger data center project in the same area from another group that was rejected in 2022. 

“We heard and took to heart many of the comments that were heard at the time and we approached this project with the sense that this is a town that’s a little nervous about this use. So it made sense to us to approach this from a standpoint of ‘let’s try a prototype’,” said Donald Gershman, a principal with Charter Development Group.

“We were trying to be sensitive to what we thought would be more acceptable to the community.”

Many residents still were critical of the amendment and what they felt was a threat to the watershed area and Spring Lake just south of the potential project site, saying that development in the area has already impacted its waterflow and the accumulation of algae in the lake. 

Others remained concerned with the noise, still dissatisfied with the assertions that the noise pollution created by the center wouldn’t have an impact on nearby residences. 

Despite this, many of the commission members were receptive to the changes put forward in the amendment and felt that it satisfied the requirements of the WI District’s purpose for “low intensity uses and emerging technological development,” outlined in town regulations.

“With all these changes it’s clear to me that there’s a sincere interest to mitigate and address public concern,” said Commission Member Bryan Rivard.  

The commission voted 4-1 to approve the amendment, with member Jeffrey Kohan voting against. This will allow the developers to proceed with a concept plan for the data center, which will have to be presented separately to the commission at a later date. 

Should the project progress, it will be one of the first data centers in Connecticut since the state passed a law to attract more data centers and technology-focused businesses, which has seen little adoption by other towns. Representatives of the Charter Development Group have said that it could attract interest from big tech firms like Google and Meta, or be used for hosting burgeoning artificial intelligence infrastructure - overall with the potential to bring in over $1 million in taxable revenue to the town. 


CT Port Authority failed to seek bids, properly purchase supplies

Bill Cummings

The Connecticut Port Authority failed to seek bids for a marketing vendor and improperly purchased a variety of services and supplies, a new state audit found.

“The authority could not explain why it did not solicit the procurement, obtain board approval before executing insurance policies or properly review invoices,” auditors said.

In a lengthy response included with the audit, the port authority partly agreed with the criticism while pointing out the agency was understaffed during the audited period and has since hired more personnel. The authority provided an explanation for each purchase criticized by auditors.

“It’s imperative to note, that upon employment, this new team has reviewed all policies and procedures and operates in accordance with the authority’s policies and procedures,” the authority said.

The audit covered the fiscal years 2022 and 2023.

The authority, located in Old Saybrook, has long endured criticism over its operations and purchasing practices, including ethics violations by members of the staff and board and the redevelopment of the State Pier in New London into an offshore wind hub. The project’s initial budget of $93 million has grown to nearly $310 million.

The authority has been without an executive director since 2022 and recently faced widespread push back for allowing the construction manager for the State Pier to hire itself for subcontracting work.

Three state legislators quickly seized on the latest audit as evidence the authority is not improving despite numerous mandated reforms by the state legislature.

“How — and why — does this keep happening,” said a joint statement from Republican state Senators Heather Somers, Henri Martin and Stephen Harding, who is the Senate Republican Minority Leader.

“It was only a year ago when the auditors cited the port authority for allowing the construction management company that is overseeing the redevelopment of the State Pier in New London to recommend itself for several multimillion-dollar subcontracts for the public infrastructure project,” the senators' statement said.

“The years go by, but the lack of transparency at the Connecticut Port Authority endures,” the senators added. “Year after year, we as lawmakers work in a bipartisan fashion to craft and pass legislation to reform the authority, yet it seems we will always have more reforms to make.”

In a press release, the authority noted it had received its third consecutive "clean audit" from an independent company hired to review its books.

“For a variety of reasons, the (authority) did not have full staffing for significant periods of time going back to 2020, and that undoubtedly hindered some processes,” said Paul Whitescarver, who was elected board chairman in August, after former Chair David Kooris stepped down following a five-year tenure but remains on the board.

The authority stressed all of those recommended improvements have been implemented now that the agency is operating with appropriate staffing.

“I want to assure our legislators and the taxpayers of Connecticut that the (authority) is operating in full compliance with policies and procedures as it continues its mission to support and enhance the state’s maritime economy,” added Whitescarver, a retired U.S. Navy Captain who also served as Commanding Officer of U.S. Naval Submarine Base New London.

The authority oversees three deep water ports, in Bridgeport, New Haven and New London, and various small and mid-size coastal and river harbors which contribute to the state’s economy, along with the State Pier. The authority’s mission is to develop and market the state’s ports and promote its maritime economy.

Not following purchasing rules

Auditors noted purchasing procedures dictate the authority maintain and consult contracted price lists and hourly rates before approving invoices. The authority should also review adequate supporting documentation detailing the services provided prior to approving an invoice, auditors said.

A review of 60 expenditures, totaling $2.8 million, found:

The authority overpaid a vendor $192 because it applied the incorrect hourly service rate. Auditors also said the authority could not provide documentation to support the contracted hourly service rates for six invoices, totaling $16,810, and as a result it could not be determined if the authority paid the proper amount.

The authority reimbursed a vendor $18,400 for subcontractor drilling services (within the budgeted contractual agreement) without reviewing or requiring proof of the vendor’s payment to the subcontractor.

Two invoices, totaling $4,626, did not contain sufficient detail describing the provided services.

The authority was unable to provide evidence of review and payment approvals for two invoices, totaling $6,325.

The authority last solicited communications and marketing services in October 2018 and executed a month-to-month contract with its current vendor on October 1, 2018. The authority paid $19,880 and $29,965 to its current vendor in fiscal years 2022 and 2023, respectively, without obtaining quotes from other vendors.

“Additionally, there was no evidence the authority received board approval for its marine general or excess marine liability insurance policies for calendar years 2022 and 2023 before executing them,” auditors said. “The annual premiums for these policies ranged from $61,200 to $138,771. We noted that the policies were within the board approved budgeted amounts.”

Auditors noted noncompliance with purchasing and procurement policies increases the risk of improper purchases and incorrect payments.

“The current administration could not comment on some issues because the previous administration processed the transactions, or they were approved by the Office of Policy and Management,” auditors said.

The finding had been previously reported, in part, in two prior audits covering the fiscal years 2018 through 2021.

“The Connecticut Port Authority should strengthen internal controls to ensure compliance with established purchasing policies,” auditors concluded.

In its response, the port authority partly agreed with the criticism but pointed out the authority only had 3.5 personnel during the audit term, which saw the hiring of an intermittent Finance Director and part-time Fiscal Analyst for financial management.

“This staff acted within policies and procedures, even under those limiting circumstances,” the authority said. “The authority has since stabilized its team with the permanent employment of key positions, which include a Finance Director, Maritime Development Manager and Office Manager. The authority is also in the process of hiring a permanent executive director.”

Regarding the seven invoices totaling $16,810, the authority said the suppliers “have been advised, and are required to fully adhere to the agreed upon rates. The overpayment of $192 was the result of an incorrect rate submitted by a vendor. This was detected by the Finance Director, and the credit of $192 has been returned by the vendor.”

On other issues raised in the audit, the authority said the drilling contract was within budget; the two invoices amounting to $4,626 were issued by month-to-month contracted suppliers for provision of supplementary services and the invoices the authority auditors said had not been reviewed occurred during the Covid epidemic and a period of remote processing.

“The approval and issuance of a check by the signing authority, at that time, served as evidence of review,” the authority said.

Additionally, the authority said the agreement for communications and marketing services was executed in 2018 and amended in 2019.

“Section 2.1 of the amended agreement indicates that it is a month-to-month agreement, and has been operating as such, as advised by the Office of Policy and Management,” the authority said. “Management of the authority utilized the services of the provider for jobs which were within the scope of services. The authority now requires quotations for supplementary services sourced by the vendor. The authority has posted an RFP for communications and marketing services.”


Neighbors voice angst at proposed Amazon facility

STEVE BIGHAM 

WATERBURY – A plan to build a 4 1/2-story Amazon retail distribution facility in the city’s South End continues to draw opposition from neighbors looking to keep the massive facility out of their backyard.

Bluewater Property Group is proposing to erect the 650,000-square-foot structure on a portion of the 155 city-owned acres along the Waterbury-Naugatuck line, an undeveloped, wooded area adjacent to Naugatuck Industrial Park.

The developer has been holding informational meetings to explain its plan to residents in both communities, bringing in experts to reassure them that the project, despite its enormity, would have little impact on the area.

But those on hand Tuesday night at Gilmartin Elementary School weren’t buying it. Many of them live in Waterbury’s Gilmartin section where the Amazon structure, if approved, would tower over their modest homes, forever altering the landscape.

“I’m not happy,” neighbor Ruth Barry said. “They’ve been trying to develop that land for years. I’ve lived here for 67 years. They tried to put in a dog track, a casino, a shopping mall and now this. The land is all rock and ledge, and I’m afraid when they start blasting, our little houses are going to be in trouble.”

The city of Waterbury has owned the property for several years after purchasing the land from a private owner.

Tommy Hyde, executive director of Waterbury Development Corp., said the city has long marketed the industrially zoned property as an attractive location for a variety of uses, but, so far, to no avail.

In May 2022, Waterbury, Naugatuck and Bluewater entered into an agreement for a project that has the potential to create up to 1,000 permanent jobs. Details of the proposed sale have not yet been disclosed.

The site plan calls for traffic improvements to enhance access to Route 8 through Naugatuck, sound barriers, ambient lighting and a storm water management plan that already has received local wetlands approvals.

Bluewater traffic engineers say about 90% of the traffic to and from the site would be from employees, with only 10% truck traffic.

The plan calls for 37 loading docks and a three-story parking garage to accommodate 1,350 vehicles.

Any potential blasting in the area would be determined after a general contractor is hired, Bernardin said.

Waterbury resident Steve Schrag said the city is trying to make a quick $2 million to sell the land “at the cost of the neighborhood,” but yearly taxes would be minimal despite the building’s estimated $2 million value because property is in a “state enterprise zone,” which allows tax breaks for the first five years.

Schrag said the idea that Amazon’s arrival would create jobs is great, but wonders why it needs to be on this particular site. He said there are plenty of brownfields in the city that would be more suitable.

 “We spent $50 million to clean up the brownfield on the site where Sears is – a company that’s now going out of business,” he said.

A year ago, the Board of Aldermen unanimously approved extending the purchase and sales agreement to allow Bluewater to continue with a construction feasibility analysis. Bluewater officials say the process has taken longer due an uncertain economic climate and what they describe as complicated site conditions, including the topography and rock conditions, which are significant challenges.

Naugatuck resident Lynn Mallery expressed concern about the impact of blasting and the potential for water draining off the property into his yard.

Bluewater’s special permit application was slated to be discussed Wednesday night at a zoning meeting in Naugatuck and is scheduled to be taken up by the Waterbury Zoning Commission in the coming weeks.

“I want to know how many trees they’re going to tear down,” Schrag said. “I want to know how much they’re going to destroy the air quality in the South End, which already has air-quality challenges.”