February 16, 2026

CT Construction Digest Monday February 16, 2026

Coast Guard museum shell to be bundled up starting Monday

John Penney

New London — Heavy-duty canvas sheeting is scheduled to be wrapped around the lower floors of the National Coast Guard Museum on Monday as winter work continues on the $150 million construction project rising from the city's waterfront.

That heat-trapping shroud, slated to remain in place until the spring, will allow crews to begin pouring 6-inch concrete floors on the lower levels of what will eventually become an 89,000-square-foot, six-story museum, project manager John Metcalf said during a recent tour of the site.

“We’ll wrap the three lower floors before installing thousands of linear feet of tubing that will be covered in concrete,” Metcalf said as sheets of melting snow rained down inside the shell of the structure's bare-metal skeleton.

That plastic tubing will serve as a radiant temperature control system for the museum, allowing hot and cold water to alternately heat or cool the floors as needed, said Wes Pulver, president of the National Coast Guard Museum Association, the group overseeing the project.

“That system will allow for a consistent temperature for our documents and artifacts, some which date back to the 1700s,” Pulver said.

Metcalf said a fire-protective coating will be sprayed onto the new concrete.

“The concrete pouring — and its curing — along with the fire-protection are both temperature-sensitive work, so we need to keep those lower spaces warm,” he said.

All tubing, floor and fire-proofing work, including on the upper levels, is expected to be completed by June ahead of installing ducts and adding exterior walls and windows.

Pulver said the museum is still scheduled to be fully built by the end of the fall. At that point, the museum will be turned over to the Coast Guard, which will set a public opening date.

Project Chief Operating Officer Mark Walsh said getting the steel frame into place last year represented one of the more dramatic and visible portions of the project.

“Those beams and girders just flew up beginning in August, but since then, crews have been busy with steel detailing work,” he said.

Museum funding secured, bridge project in limbo

The project is being paid for with a combination of $50 million in direct federal funding and $48 million in private donations. That left a roughly $48 million cost gap that was closed in December after the signing of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act.

That legislation removed a decades-long legal barrier that prevented the U.S. Coast Guard from helping fund the museum project. Pulver said the Coast Guard has already signed contracts related to the remaining work, though the exact amount of funding it was committing to was not yet finalized.

The museum, on the city’s waterfront behind Union Station, will feature 38,168 square feet of exhibit space divided into three decks and five wings showing off various aspects of the branch’s lifesaving, enforcement and environmental missions.

The glass-encased building will include a rotating gallery, innovation lab and STEM center, as well as an HH-60J Jayhawk helicopter suspended in its atrium. The 295-foot barque Eagle, the Coast Guard Academy’s training ship, will be homeported at City Pier, near the museum.

Local officials are counting on the museum to serve as a major attraction that will draw up to 300,000 visitors annually.

A separate project, the construction of a 600-foot, glass-encased pedestrian bridge linking the museum to the nearby Water Street parking garage, is still in limbo.

The State Bond Commission in 2018 earmarked $19.5 million for construction of the span, with $500,000 in state funds being previously approved for planning and design work.

But the sole bid for the project received in October came in higher than expected, forcing the association and state officials to consider cost-saving and schedule adjustments.

Pulver last week said state officials are still discussing next steps on the bridge project.


Eversource unveils $26.5B capital plan, boosting infrastructure spending

Andrew Larson

Eversource Energy announced a $26.5 billion five-year capital investment plan Thursday, marking a major increase in infrastructure spending as the utility navigates regulatory changes and grid modernization demands across its New England service territory.

The plan for 2026 through 2030 represents a $2.3 billion increase over the company’s previous $24.2 billion forecast, with the additional spending primarily directed toward electric and natural gas distribution infrastructure, according to the company’s fourth-quarter earnings report.

Compared to Eversource’s earlier plan for 2025 through 2029, the new forecast adds $1.5 billion in investment. Both projections exclude any capital spending related to Aquarion Water Co., the utility’s water subsidiary currently subject to regulatory proceedings over a proposed $2.4 billion sale.

Eversource didn’t break down where those investments would be targeted. The Hartford and Boston-based utility operates in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire.

Eversource had previously threatened to reduce its capital spending in Connecticut due to the uncertain regulatory environment under former Public Utilities Regulatory Authority Chair Marissa Gillett.

“These investments enable Eversource to continue to provide customers with safe and reliable service, support load growth and clean energy objectives for the Eversource territory,” the company said in its earnings release.

Eversource reported fourth-quarter earnings of $421.3 million, or $1.12 per share, up from $72.5 million, or 20 cents per share in the year-ago period, beating analyst expectations. Revenue for the quarter rose 13.4% to $3.37 billion from $2.97 billion in the year-ago period.

For the full year 2025, Eversource reported earnings of $1.69 billion, or $4.56 per share, compared with $811.7 million, or $2.27 per share, in 2024.

The company set 2026 earnings guidance between $4.80 and $4.95 per share and projected long-term earnings growth of 5% to 7% annually through 2030.

To support its capital plan, the utility expects to raise $800 million to $1.1 billion in equity over the 2026 to 2030 period. The company said the equity raise “is not impacted by the status of the potential sale of Aquarion.”

The increased infrastructure spending comes as Eversource navigates leadership changes at the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority.

Eversource Chairman Joe Nolan said in the earnings release that the company made “significant progress in achieving constructive regulatory outcomes by working collaboratively with our regulators during a time of extensive change at the state and federal levels.”

Eversource serves approximately 4.6 million electric, natural gas and water customers, making it New England’s largest energy delivery system.


CTDOT Route 8 bridge project to begin. It will close a local road to through traffic for 2 months

The state Department of Transportation says it is metallizing bridges in northwest Connecticut.

The upcoming work will include the bridge that carries Route 8 over Hill Street in Torrington, according to the DOT.

The work is scheduled to begin on Friday, February 20 and be completed on Wednesday, April 22, 2026, according to the DOT.

As a result, Hill Street will be closed to through traffic starting February 20 and through Wednesday, April 22, according to the DOT.

All traffic will be detoured to Laurel Hill Road and there will be traffic control signing patterns to guide motorists through the work zone, according to the DOT.

“Motorists should be aware that modifications or extensions to this schedule may become necessary due to weather delays or other unforeseen conditions” and are “advised to maintain a safe speed when driving in this area, according to the DOT.

The agency noted, records show, that the “purpose and need of the project is to protect the steel members and preserve the condition of these bridges, thus extending their useful service lives and keeping them in a state of good repair.”

There also will be “minor utility impacts anticipated, involving temporary lowering and/or burial of communication facilities at a few sites,” according to DOT records about the full project.

A meeting on the project was held in 2024 and, in response to a question, Mike Jacovino, of the engineering firm Close, Jensen and Miller, P.C., said that, because of the age of bridges in the program, the specifications “call for lead testing and there are additional procedures in place for that. The enclosures are required so as to not release anything into the environment. There are also construction and coating inspectors on site that make sure the project is following the book.”

And, in response to a question about steel repairs and bridge safety, Jacovino responded that the “proposed repairs are routine in nature and are being performed in part as a preparation for painting. He ensured the attendees that there were currently no unsafe conditions on these bridges.”

This project included metallizing bridges along the Route 8 corridor between Torrington and Colebrook, and includes Torrington, Winchester and Colebrook, the DOT record shows.

According to the DOT the project was awarded to Allied Painting Inc. for $15.8 million in December 2024.  It is scheduled to be completed Nov. 30, 2027 and is administered by the Bureau of Engineering and Construction, Office of Construction, District 4 in Thomaston.


Central CT town targeted for two major projects. One would add 200+ apartments with amenities.

Don Stacom 

A central Connecticut town faces two significant development initiatives over the next month

In Cromwell, a Middletown excavating company is looking to establish a rock-crushing operation and a New York-based developer is asking to revise the plan for a 267-unit apartment complex on the former Crowne Plaza site.

Gallitto Construction is requesting a permit to allow stone crushing at 150 Sebethe Drive, an industrial property in a relatively remote section of town where it already trucks in large quantities of rock. It would use a 41-foot long mobile crusher along with an excavator.

Residents will get to hear details and then speak about the proposal at a Planning and Zoning Commission hearing Tuesday evening.

The company wants to be allowed to use a commercial crusher to process the rock on site, but says it wouldn’t be done frequently.

“The amount of materials and truck traffic for a daily basis would vary due to the materials availability. My estimation of trucked in materials to make a pile may take up to one to two months for crushing, therefore I am not looking to crush on an everyday basis,” the company said in a Jan. 11 letter to town officials.

“Crushing would vary on the availability of supply and demand,” it said, estimating that crushing could take about a week each time.

The company said it envisions a similar operation to what Newington-based Paramount construction and General Construction run.

Gallitto requested a permit allowing operations Mondays to Saturdays from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m., but town zoning officials are considering tightening that significantly.

“We want to create proposed conditions of approval that protect the neighbors,” said Andrew Armstrong, director of planning and development.

Armstrong has recommended limiting the company to four one-week periods a year for crushing, and requiring it to meet with commissioners after the first year to evaluate any concerns. He also wants Gallitto to provide an annual report listing operating times and the amount of material crushed.

Zoning Enforcement Officer Bruce Driska this week recommended limiting the schedule to weekdays from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., and requiring Gallitto to notify his office in writing each time it plans to conduct crushing operations.

“The typical concerns from such an operation would be noise, dust and the management of the material piles to prevent migration of sediments,” Town Engineer Jon Harriman wrote last week. “The noise is covered by town ordinance, and the equipment listed appears to include a means of wetting the operation to reduce dust. The commission may wish to explore the material management plan with the applicant.”

In March, commissioners will hear Alpine Residential’s plan for redeveloping the long-abandoned hotel property at 100 Berlin Road.

Once a thriving Crowne Plaza, the hotel was downgraded to a Radisson and then a Red Lion before closing abruptly in early 2020 when the state suspended its tax permit. Lexington Partners bought the site with plans for a large-scale apartment complex, but progress stalled and last fall it agreed to sell the property to Alpine.

Alpine has already gotten a special permit for a 267-unit apartment complex on the property, but it will now go to a March 3 hearing for approval to construct mixed-use housing.

The company wants to build a one-story, 13,000-square-foot retail building and two five-story apartment buildings between 112,000 square feet and 120,000 square feet. The complex would have a pool and 12,000-square-foot courtyard, along with a total of about 4,900 square feet of indoor amenity space.

“This area is lined with an associated 2,200 square-foot stand-alone amenity building that is intended to be the central arrival point for visitors and future residents,” according to its plan.

Town officials have been upbeat about getting the property back into productive use, and are particularly eager to see the vandalized and water-damaged old building demolished. Urban explorers for years have been breaking into the wrecked hotel to take social media videos of the mess.


Snow and cold scrambled CT’s power grid. Here’s how it stayed up

John Moritz and Sasha Allen

As more than a foot of snow fell on parts of Connecticut in the early hours of Jan. 25, a massive shift was taking place within power plants across New England.

Oil-fired “peaker” power plants, left to idle for much of the year, were turned on as the need for power surged and the region’s fleet of gas-fired plants was unable to keep up with demand. At other dual-fuel plants, gas turbines were switched to run off stockpiles of oil, which is dirtier and typically more expensive to burn than gas.

Peak demand hovered around 19,000 megawatts for 10 straight days from late January into February. Matt Kakley, a spokesperson for the regional grid operator ISO New England, said it was the first time in nearly a decade the region saw such a stretch of high wintertime demand.

During that time, the region relied heavily on oil to produce electricity — a phenomenon that is not unusual for the occasional New England cold snap. But data shows that oil reliance lasted far longer than normal.

Frigid temperatures also prevented snow from melting off of solar panels, further scrambling the mix of resources needed to power the grid.

“I think what was kind of atypical is how long it went on,” Kakley said. “That level of long-duration cold snap we probably haven’t seen in New England since 2017-2018. And so what we’ve kind of been saying is that this is the most stressed the system’s been since then, so almost a decade.”

Others said that the sheer scale of the weather system — which at its peak stretched across 2,000 miles — made an impact unprecedented in recent memory. 

“This has been the most logistically strained situation to get the right supplies to power plants that I have seen in my career,” said Dan Dolan, the president of the New England Power Generators Association. Dolan has worked in the industry for two decades. 

Low temperatures pummeled the energy grid — in more ways than one

Throughout most of the year, New England relies heavily on natural gas brought in by pipelines to fuel its power generation. Whenever temperatures drop below freezing, however, the availability of that gas becomes constrained as it is burned in furnaces to keep homes and other buildings warm.

As a result, gas prices increase, making it less economical as a fuel source for power plants. That’s when the demand for oil kicks in.

Dolan said one of the unique challenges from this period of cold is that it affected power plants all along the Eastern Seaboard, not just in New York and New England.

As plants exhausted their supplies of oil to keep up with grid demand, they had to compete against other facilities in states like Maryland and North Carolina for fresh deliveries of oil via barge, trucks and tanker ships, Dolan said. Power plants in Connecticut typically utilize two types of oil: lighter, distillate oil is used by new dual-fuel plants, while older peaker plants tend to rely on heavier, tar-like oil also known as “bunker fuel.”

“It has actually taken an extra level of logistics scheduling, trying to order and set units up to be able to hit multiple facilities at once,” Dolan said.

The spot market price for wholesale electricity in Connecticut skyrocketed multiple times during the winter storm, driven up by high demand and the compilation of constraints facing the grid. For example, on Jan. 24, the marginal price of electricity during one five-minute interval reached a peak of $872 a megawatt hour, more than five-and-a-half times the monthly average of $155. (Supply rates in electric bills are typically established through longer-term contracts for electricity, so customers are insulated from such price spikes).

Data from ISO New England shows that the situation was compounded by the low functionality of solar panels. Extremely low temperatures curbed snow melt and stunted solar energy generation for days following the storm.

Mike Trahan, the executive director of Connecticut Solar & Storage Association, said such situations do pose a challenge for the industry, even though they are rare.

“Snow followed by cold can be problematic, especially for rooftop systems that sit flat on the roof. Those are the last ones to shed snow and reach their full efficiency,” Trahan said. “I think it’s accurate to say that this most recent cold snap was uncommon, and we probably haven’t had this kind of weather, based on what I read, in a decade.”

ISO New England measures the production of larger solar arrays that distribute power directly onto the grid. However, most rooftop solar panels operate behind-the-meter, meaning their output is not recording in generation data. Instead, ISO New England uses its own estimates to determine how much the demand for power off the grid is being replaced by behind-the-meter solar.

“The cold weather will drive natural gas prices high, and so that will make oil more economical. At the same time, demand on the system is higher because we’re not seeing as much as we did a week before from solar panels, because they’re covered in snow,” Kakley said. “We can see very cold weather without any snow, and that’s not going to impact the solar panels very much. But this was kind of a two-fer, so to speak.”

Not all renewable and clean-energy sources suffered as much as solar during the storm and subsequent cold weather. Nuclear performed at a near-constant output, meeting about one-quarter of the region’s demand.

Wind power also helped to pick up some of the slack from slumping solar production, reaching a peak of 29,854 megawatt hours of electricity on Jan. 30 — nearly nine times the amount produced by grid-scale solar. While ISO New England does not distinguish between offshore and onshore turbines in its wind data, Dolan said that Vineyard Wind — the partially-completed wind farm off the coast of Martha’s Vineyard — performed well during and after the storm.

“The anecdotal [evidence] is that it did, across the three weeks, produce a lot of energy,” Dolan said.

The amount of wind power could have been even greater if a second project, Revolution Wind, had come partially online before the storm. That project is expected to begin producing power in the next several weeks, according to developer Ørsted, after facing several delays due to stop-work orders from the Trump administration.

Planning ahead

The complications paired with the storm bring up multiple questions, as well possible solutions for dealing with similar winter weather events in the future.

For solar, Trahan said the impact from snow usually dissipates once it melts in a few days. Building more battery facilities to store that power for times of need would help the grid withstand temporary losses in solar production. He also said that would help to eliminate the need to burn oil during the coldest days of the year.

“The use of those peakers is concerning for those people who live around or live downwind of peakers, myself included, and that’s certainly that’s a health concern,” Trahan said. “If we’re looking for ways to avoid the use of those peakers … one of the ways to do that is to increase the use and the deployment of storage.”

Kakley said that ISO New England conducts rolling 21-day-ahead forecasts of weather and fuel supplies to ensure that generators have the resources necessary to keep their plants running.

“When you see this period of cold weather, if you get adequate replenishment of oil, you can kind of keep running the system that way for a long time,” Kakley said. “But where is that going to go? Are you going to use the oil faster than it can be replaced?

Dolan said there is “no silver bullet.” He said every little bit of extra energy generation helps, including renewables and new imports of hydroelectricity from Canada.

While he pointed out the problems that came with the extreme weather, Dolan also mentioned the resilience of the system through the high-demand days.

“Yes, there are tremendous emissions consequences. Certainly, prices have been way more volatile than is normal, but we have not seen a single major reliability issue on the system in some of the most severe weather that we’ve had in about a decade,” Dolan said. “I think that’s a testament to the extraordinary work and coordination occurring.”