May 21, 2026

CT Construction Digest Thursday May 21, 2026

Energy company proposes big natural gas pipeline expansion in New England

Miriam Wasser

Less than three years after a large fossil fuel company proposed expanding a major natural gas pipeline in New England, the company, Enbridge, is back with a new proposal.

Known as "Project Beacon," the expansion would substantially increase the amount of gas that can flow into the Northeast through the Algonquin Gas Transmission line. This pipeline carries fracked natural gas from northern New Jersey through parts of New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island and into Massachusetts.

Details about the proposed project are vague, but according to documents released by Enbridge this week, the company would replace existing lines with larger diameter pipes in some places and run secondary pipe lines alongside existing ones in other places. Project Beacon would also involve expanding some compressor stations along the route, and could include new gas storage facilities.

Depending on customer demand, the project could expand capacity on the pipeline by 10%, the company said, and be in service by late 2030.

"Project Beacon would help meet growing energy demand by easing longstanding pipeline bottlenecks that have contributed to higher energy costs for consumers," Enbridge spokesperson Max Bergeron wrote in an email. "By improving access to abundant domestic energy supplies, the project aims to reduce price spikes and strengthen the region’s energy system."

If all of this sounds familiar, that's because it's remarkably similar to a different proposal — "Project Maple" —  the company announced in late 2023.

Same pipeline, same concept for expansion, same reasons given.

While Project Maple eventually fizzled, Project Beacon could turn out to be a different story. That's because unlike in 2023, the politics of energy affordability and climate change are very different in the region.

"There is a responsibility now on all the participants in the energy system to make clear eyed, difficult decisions to preserve reliability and affordability, while continuing to keep an eye on decarbonization," said Dan Dolan, president of the New England Power Generators Association.

Thanks to a combination of cold weather and higher prices, ratepayers across New England have become laser-focused on what they're paying each month in utility bills. A recent survey from the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce found that energy affordability was the top household concern among residents of Massachusetts.

What's more, demand for power is growing in the region, and renewable sources, like offshore wind, have faced several years of economic and political headwinds.

"New England clearly will need additional energy supplies in the years ahead," Dolan said. "Proposals like Project Beacon are welcome developments in signaling investment interest, even with the many hurdles that need to be overcome," like financing the project and getting it permitted.

In announcing Project Beacon, Enbridge is kicking off something called "open season." Think of it like an auction to gauge interest: Enbridge puts the project proposal out into the world and asks gas companies and power plants if they're interested in buying gas.

Based on the bids that come in, Enbridge will design a final project and take it to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for review.

In an email, National Grid spokesperson Brendan Moss said the company was aware of the proposal and "will carefully assess any potential opportunity as part of our responsibility to secure cost-effective supply solutions for our customers and make decisions based on what best serves them and aligns with applicable regulatory review and approval."

He added that "expanding access to reliable, lower-cost energy supply can help improve affordability, reduce volatility, support system reliability, and strengthen economic competitiveness across the region."

A representative from Eversource, the other large gas utility in the region, did not respond to questions about whether the company is interested in putting in a bid.

Earlier this year, the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities approved a plan for Eversource to buy more gas from Enbridge as part of a separate pipeline expansion plan.

Gov. Maura Healey, who opposed pipeline projects in the past, threw her support behind Eversource's plan. Healey, who bills herself as a strong climate champion, has also said that she supports an "all of the above" approach to energy in the state, which could include more natural gas.

Asked about the new proposal from Enbridge, a spokesperson said the governor is focused on lowering energy costs, creating jobs and reducing the state's dependence on expensive oil and liquified natural gas.

"The governor will review this proposal carefully to make sure it is a good deal for ratepayers," the spokesperson said.

New England has several large pipelines that carry natural gas into the region, but on cold days, when demand for home heating spikes, the region's power plants often turn to burning oil, which is more expensive and polluting. The region also supplements some of its pipeline gas with liquified natural gas that comes in through a terminal in Everett, but that fuel is also expensive.

While past attempts to build a new gas pipeline into the region have failed in the last decade, many in Massachusetts have called for building new pipelines or expanding existing ones to help relieve supply constraints during the winter. Among them are Republican gubernatorial candidates Brian Shortsleeve and Mike Minogue.

Many environmentalists, meanwhile, have said a new pipeline could end up increasing utility bills — not to mention also running counter to the state's climate laws.

"New England's energy challenges are not going be solved by increasing the supply of fossil fuels," said Caitlin Peale Sloan of the Conservation Law Foundation. "We fundamentally need to be looking at decreasing peak need for gas overall, and we need to be really carefully reckoning with the cost that these resources put on to customers and people who have to breathe air when fuels are being burned."

Peale Sloan said she has a lot of questions and concerns about the Project Beacon proposal, including whether it's truly offering a new and flexible energy solution for New England. Because right now, she added, it sure looks a lot like "a retread of the pipeline strategy that failed 10 years ago."


Residents push back hard at Killingly zoning hearing

Connor Linskey

Killingly residents strongly opposed two distribution centers with unnamed tenants proposed at 90 Putnam Pike at the planning and zoning commission meeting May 18. 

During the public hearing for the project, Killingly resident Al Dufresne questioned the impacts the project would have on traffic, noise and lighting. 

“Before approval, the commission must require the applicant explain exactly the type of operation these buildings are designed for and what limits will be placed on truck traffic, hours of operation, trailer storage, hazardous materials and future tenant use,” Dufresne said. 

Claudette Rogers has been a school bus driver in Killingly for 18 years. During that time, she has seen how trucks have impacted traffic and she’s worried about the traffic the distribution centers might cause. One example she gave was when the bus she was driving, along with two others, collided while being stuck behind a garbage truck. 

“I couldn’t imagine meeting four tractor trailer trucks,” Rogers said during the public hearing. 

What residents said via written public comment 

Only two Killingly residents spoke at the public hearing on May 18, as the planning and zoning commission meeting had to finish by 11 p.m. However, many residents expressed their disapproval of the project in emails to the town, which were made part of the agenda packet for the meeting on May 18. 

One such email was from Patricia Klausen of Dayville. Klausen is concerned about the environmental impacts of the two proposed distribution centers. 

“This proposal raises serious environmental concerns that cannot and should not be ignored,” Klausen said in her email. “The potential destruction and contamination risks to local aquafers are alarming, especially in a region where clean groundwater is essential to residents, ecosystems and future generations. Once these natural water systems are damaged, they cannot simply be restored.” 

Tiffany Lucas of Danielson opposed the distribution centers, writing in her email to the town that they would damage the town’s rural character. 

“Our area is one of the last green valleys,” Lucas said. “We are encroaching on wildlife habitat just by living and if we add these massive distribution sites it will be another layer of removing that.” 

The planning and zoning commission continued the public hearing to their next meeting on June 15. 

About the project 

Killingly 1, LLC is proposing two new distribution centers totaling approximately 467,500 square feet of gross floor area with associated loading bays, trailer parking spaces, employee parking, access drives, stormwater management systems, retaining walls, septic systems, utilities, landscaping and lighting. There is also an Amazon fulfillment center proposed on 228 Westcott Road in Killingly.


Developer proposes 22-story, 305-unit apartment tower in Bridgeport

Michael Juliano

A developer has proposed a 22-story mixed-use tower with 305 apartments in Bridgeport, according to an application filed with the city’s Planning and Zoning Department.

Jonathan Gonzalez, of Meriden, has proposed constructing the building on a 0.44-acre parcel at 110-118 Congress St. A three-story commercial building on the property would get demolished to make way for the proposed building.

Gonzalez said the project is part of a broader goal to build 20,000 apartment units nationwide to generate cash flow for Second Start Inc., a nonprofit he founded that provides housing and support services for disadvantaged people.

As part of a separate Bridgeport project, he said he also plans to build an eight-story, 346-unit apartment building on Myrtle Avenue in partnership with the property owner.

“We have a lot of big initiatives, and in order to get to that initiative, we have to create a cash flow,” he said.

The first two floors of the proposed Congress Street building would include office and retail space for tenants such as a grocer, cafe and pharmacy, according to the application. Apartments would occupy the remaining 20 floors.

Plans include installing paved driveways, sidewalks, new utilities, a stormwater management system and landscaped areas.

“The proposed project represents a significant redevelopment of an underutilized commercial property into a modern mixed-use development that enhances the urban fabric of the surrounding area,” the application said.

The three-story building currently on-site is owned by Northeast Film Storage LLC, controlled by Ian Stone and Ralph Stevens, both of New York. They bought the property for $435,000 in 2010. Gonzalez said he is under contract to buy the building.

The city’s Planning and Zoning Commission is scheduled to hold a public hearing on the proposal on May 26.


Crumbling ex-CT hospital site targeted for adaptive reuse. City notes ‘live, work, play’ potential

Sean Krofssik

It was started as a state hospital for people with mental illness and remained operational until the buildings were abandoned in 1996.

Now some of remaining crumbling and abandoned buildings sit on the banks of the Thames River directly across from the posh Mohegan Sun casino buildings.

The city of Norwich wants to change the future of the buildings in its city that serve almost as a gateway to the nearly 300-year-old community at the confluence of the Yantic and Shetucket rivers in eastern Connecticut.

The city is soliciting bids for qualifications for developers to study the former site of Norwich State Hospital, a plan that seeks adaptive reuse of the parts of the site that are in Norwich. The city said it seeks “professional consulting firms and teams to complete a planning study to reimagine the former Norwich State Hospital.”

The Norwich property is located at 628 and 705 Laurel Hill Road on Connecticut Route 12, and the Norwich request for quotation indicates there also is a hope to create a community-driven vision for the site.

“The planning effort will focus on creating a vision for the future redevelopment of the area that will provide a sense of place for city residents and visitors alike. The former hospital property is a prime location for the construction of a live, work, play development that would exist in concert with the neighboring Preston Riverwalk,” according to the city of Norwich RFQ.

The RFQ project is funded by a $250,000 Community Investment Fund 2030 Grant and is expected to complement the upcoming Preston Riverwalk development, which will be constructed by the Mohegan Tribe.

“The Gateway Norwich planning project is intended to provide the community with a blueprint for strategic future growth through public outreach and visioning exercises,” according to the Norwich RFQ.

The Norwich Community Development Corporation owns parts of the property and buildings on the land are listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

As The Courant has reported in the past, the hospital’s striking design, its contribution to the history of medicine, and the leafy tranquility of its campus combined in the late 1980s to earn it inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. Much of the campus and its principle buildings were in Preston, with a portion in Norwich.

The state had begun neglecting the hospital in the late 1970s, according to former superintendent Garrell S. Mullaney, and decided to close it in 1996 when the movement of patients from institutional to community care reduced its residential population. Custodianship of the closed hospital moved from the state Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services to the Department of Public Works, The Courant has reported. Land was also sold to Preston, which has engaged in extensive study, demolition and remediation at the site, records show. 

The property on 628 Laurel Hill Road in Norwich is approximately 40.95 acres and sits on the eastern side of the roadway. The property is on a sloping terrain that had 16 residential units on the upper plateau that were nurse’s homes, records show. There are also four large administration buildings..

The 705 Laurel Hill Road is approximately 8.07 acres and located on the western side. The property included a large administration building and four out-buildings, records show. Both properties were donated by a private owner to non-profit Norwich Community Development Corporation in December 2024. NCDC is a quasi-governmental economic development partner of the city of Norwich.

A limited environmental assessment was completed in 2020 that included multiple phases as well as a limited hazardous building materials assessment as a part of the “city-wide brownfield assessment,” and in 2025, the Norwich Community Development Corporation was awarded additional Brownfield funds, records show. The brownfield work there has not started yet but will be happening while the planning study is underway, records show.

“The goal of the study is to help stakeholders identify the most viable, community supported, and tax positive uses for the two underutilized, blighted properties. Knowing which land uses are trending and desirable for developers will guide the future zoning text amendments of the new Norwich State Hospital Zone. The study shall include guidance and insight into the potential scope of required brownfield remediation and abatement work necessary to facilitate determined market supported uses,” according to the Norwich RFQ.

The initiative, which is led by Norwich City Planner Dan Daniska, is intended to involve residents’ voices on the future of the area of the city.

“Gateway Norwich planning will connect residents, city officials, property owners, and other key partners to develop ideas for an inclusive, prosperous future for the former state hospital area,” according to the city RFQ.

Part of the baseline assessment would be to review existing conditions, including analysis of available brownfield data and general condition of buildings, soliciting input from Norwich and regional stakeholders, consensus building, and sharing project information through multiple methods, records show.

The city also noted that, among the factors being weighed by the selection committee are: technical competence of the consultant/firm; quality and performance of past services on similar projects; experience of key personnel including the sub-contractors; demonstrated knowledge of environmental remediation and brownfield redevelopment and state of Connecticut DECD and DEEP funding programs; expected quality of the scope of work and deliverables the consultant proposes to provide for the established budget and the ability to perform the professional services without exceeding the grant award, according to the Norwich RFQ.

As far as the project schedule, once the consultant is selected, they should be ready “to begin work as directed by the City of Norwich on or about July 1, 2026. It is anticipated that the contracted services as described in this RFQ shall be completed within nine months of award unless an extension of time has been agreed upon by the City of Norwich and consultant,” the RFQ notes.

The submittals of qualifications for planning for the adaptive reuse of the hospital are accepted until May 27 at 2 p.m. All bids are to be submitted by that time; they will be opened on the city of Norwich procurement portal.


Major milestone: Coast Guard Museum hoists rescue helicopter into building 

Gianni Salisbury

New London — A retired MH-60T Jayhawk U.S. Coast Guard helicopter was lifted into the under-construction Coast Guard Museum on Wednesday.

The multi-mission recovery helicopter, which was active from 1990 to December 2023 and saved over 333 lives, arrived Monday from Elizabeth City, N.C., according to retired Coast Guard Capt. Wes Pulver, president of the National Coast Guard Museum Association.

The helicopter is white and red and has a 54-foot wingspan. It can reach a maximum speed of 205 mph and accumulated 18,855 flight hours during its time.

The future director of the museum, retired Coast Guard captain Carl Riedlin, flew the helicopter while serving in Astoria, Ore., and doing search and rescue missions. It just happened by chance that the helicopter he flew ended up in the museum.

"It is really neat that it is here. It's amazing. One of the goals of the museum is that people who served, when they walk through the museum, they see something that they did and the contributions they made. So it's really neat to see that," Riedlin said.

The helicopter's career began in Clearwater, Fla., flying drug interdiction missions and responding to the Haitian boat lifts in the ’90s. Some of its other notable stations were Air Station Astoria in Oregon, Air Station Cape Cod in Massachusetts, and Air Station Kodiak in Alaska.

Wednesday morning the helicopter was placed on a sled, which was hooked into the side of the building and then lifted and rolled into the building. In a few months, it will hang from the ceiling in the atrium of the museum.

The final display with have replicas of a real crew from Elizabeth City, N.C., that flew the helicopter. The display will reenact the crew rescuing a swimmer.

"They took plaster castings of the crew so the display is going to look lifelike and show renditions of real people, which I think is the coolest thing ever," Riedlin said.

During a tour on Wednesday afternoon, project manager John Metcalf and head architect Stephanie Balsam, who works for Payette, a Boston-based architecture and design firm, reported on the progress of the museum and what each floor will feature.

The $150 million museum will have six floors containing exhibits, galleries, a STEM education center, a learning exhibit for young children, a terrace and event space.

Before the tour, a rescue training demonstration took place in the Thames River off City Pier with a Jayhawk helicopter. During the demonstration, a man was dropped into the water and then called for help, as if in distress. The helicopter then lifted him out of the water.

Commandant of the Coast Guard Adm. Kevin E. Lunday stopped by to watch the demonstration following the Coast Guard Academy graduation. The demonstration was meant to show the types of rescues the retired Jayhawk completed during its time.

Recently the museum faced funding issues after realizing the $20 million funding commitment by the state in 2014 to a 400-foot, glass-enclosed bridge over Water Street was significantly less than what it will now cost. However U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., and other Connecticut lawmakers secured $50 million in federal funding, the association raised $54 million in donations and President Trump signed the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, which allowed the Coast Guard to help fund the project.

Pulver explained the museum is looking to bring big crowds to the city, with an estimated 300,000 guests the first year.

"We can't wait to bring folks in. We want to connect people to the rest of New London. We want to make it a visitor experience. The question is how do we connect them to town? How do we connect them to Mystic or Westerly?" Pulver said.

Pulver said construction is expected to be complete in November, followed by the installation of exhibits. Pulver said nothing is set in stone, but he estimates the museum will open sometime in 2027.

For more information on the building of the museum, visit the Coast Guard Museum Association website.


May 20, 2026

CT Construction Digest Wednesday May 20, 2026

New law gives CT Comptroller authority to halt payments to state contractors over wage violations

David Krechevsky

The state Comptroller will soon have the authority to withhold payments to contractors or subcontractors accused of violating Connecticut’s prevailing wage laws on public works projects.

The authority was granted by Public Act 26-17, formerly Senate Bill 268, which overwhelmingly passed this year in both legislative chambers and was signed into law by Gov. Ned Lamont on May 14.

The law goes into effect on Oct. 1. It is intended to strengthen enforcement against wage theft and prevailing wage violations involving state-funded construction projects, according to state officials.

It authorizes the state comptroller to withhold payments owed to a contractor or subcontractor if the state labor commissioner issues a stop-work order related to violations of Connecticut’s prevailing wage statute.

The law gives the comptroller additional leverage to ensure workers on state projects are properly paid before contractors receive additional public funding.

The prevailing wage is the hourly rate and benefits paid to most workers on public works projects for similar work in a specific area.

During a public hearing held on the bill by the Labor and Public Employees Committee in February, state Comptroller Sean Scanlon spoke in favor of the bill, which he had proposed last year but ultimately died in the House.

Scanlon noted that the state Department of Labor can investigate cases when contractors are accused of cheating employees and place stop-work orders on public projects until workers have been repaid, but that his office lacked similar authority.

“There is currently no ability for my office to withhold state payments to such contractors, allowing them to still be paid by taxpayer funds even when they are being actively investigated for a prevailing wage violation,” he said. “That’s wrong, and we shouldn’t reward employers who fail to follow the law with taxpayer dollars.”

Christopher Fryxell, president of the Associated Builders and Contractors of Connecticut (CTABC), testified against the bill, saying his organization believes “innocent contractors will be harmed in the process.”

Because the state contracts with just the prime contractor, Fryxell said, it is not clear how the comptroller would withhold payments from a contractor or subcontractor accused of violating prevailing wage laws without unfairly “harming innocent contractors in the process.”

The bill was subsequently approved by a 31-5 vote in the Senate on April 15, and was approved in the House on May 4 by a 107-40 vote with four legislators absent.


Hartford Hospital’s $1B campus overhaul targets emergency department overcrowding

David Krechevsky

In 2025, the average wait time to be treated in Hartford Hospital’s emergency department was nearly nine hours.

That’s according to an online database maintained by the Connecticut College of Emergency Physicians (CCEP), which tracks so-called “boarding” statistics for the state’s 26 acute-care hospitals.

The 8.9-hour average wait was the worst of any state ED last year. Charlotte Hungerford Hospital in Torrington and William Backus in Norwich — each also owned by Hartford HealthCare (HHC) — tied for the second-worst, with average wait times at 8.4 hours.

The state’s busiest emergency department at Yale New Haven Hospital had an average wait time of 5.4 hours. That was despite treating 228,586 patients last year vs. the 109,166 treated at Hartford Hospital, according to CCEP.

As overcrowding pressures mount, Hartford HealthCare is making expansion and modernization of the ED a major focus of a more than $1 billion plan to remake 15 buildings on and around its Hartford campus.

The plan, details of which were recently unveiled, also includes renovating the former Girl Scouts headquarters at 340 Washington St. into a GoHealth Urgent Care center. Hartford HealthCare acquired the building last year.

The project’s centerpiece is a new $950 million, 14-story inpatient tower featuring 216 additional private patient beds and three floors of procedural space for electrophysiology, cardiac catheterization, gastroenterology and ambulatory surgery.

The initiative also includes a new patient arrival center with a two-story atrium, a 1,650-car parking garage and 500-seat conference center.

Hartford HealthCare plans to finance the overhaul in part through approximately $850 million in bond financing, along with endowment funds and private fundraising.

But Jeffrey Flaks, president and CEO of Hartford HealthCare, said the investment is ultimately about more than construction. He described it as a once-in-a-generation effort to modernize the hospital and improve the areas of care that matter most to patients.

Industry observers say the initiative also reflects a broader strategic shift across healthcare, as major systems nationally invest heavily in access, patient flow and campus modernization to strengthen their competitive positions in the post-pandemic marketplace.

“What Hartford HealthCare is endeavoring to do is what many of the largest health systems around the country are doing now, which is to provide easy access to definitive care,” said Jeff Hogan, president of Upside Health Advisors, a Farmington-based industry consultancy.

“The big health systems are building out their infrastructure, for better or worse, so that they will get more brand loyalty,” Hogan added.

‘Completely overwhelmed’

There is little debate that many hospital emergency departments — particularly Level I trauma centers like Hartford Hospital’s — are under intense strain.

“EDs are completely overwhelmed,” Hogan said.

According to Karen Goyette, executive vice president and chief strategy and transformation officer for HHC, Hartford Hospital’s emergency department sees about 300 patients daily.

“It’s probably one of the busiest in the United States,” she said.

A February report published by Becker’s Hospital Review ranked Hartford Hospital’s ED as the 44th busiest in the nation last year. Yale New Haven Hospital ranked third.

Hartford Hospital also refers pediatric emergency cases to nearby Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, which treated roughly 58,000 patients last year, according to the CCEP database. Combined, the two facilities would rank among the busiest emergency care hubs in the country.

Goyette said overcrowding is driven in part by patients using emergency rooms because they lack access to primary care and other healthcare resources.

“Unfortunately, the reality is that many people today lack primary care, lack resources, and they’re … utilizing our emergency department as their first line of defense,” she said.

The planned 2,500-square-foot urgent care center on Washington Street is intended to divert lower-acuity cases away from the ED and free emergency staff to focus on patients requiring more intensive treatment, she said.

Hartford HealthCare operates 50 urgent care centers statewide, which Goyette said each handle “upwards of 75 patients a day.”

Hartford HealthCare is also reserving about 1,500 square feet in the former Girl Scouts building for four additional patient rooms to accommodate future demand.

Expanding the ED will also include renovating the first floor of the adjacent Conklin Building into 30 observation beds for behavioral health and mental health patients who are often “warehoused” in the emergency department while awaiting placement elsewhere, Goyette said.

The new beds are expected to open within six months and should help reduce wait times, she said.

Understaffing can also contribute to emergency department overcrowding, but Flaks said Hartford HealthCare plans to hire additional clinical and administrative workers to support the expansion.

Financial strength

The project’s scale comes with significant financial commitments beyond construction costs alone.

According to Flaks, thousands of patients who currently seek care in Hartford Hospital’s emergency department each year are expected to be redirected to the urgent care facility.

An average emergency department visit can generate roughly $1,300 in revenue or more, he said, while an urgent care visit may generate closer to $120 — or, in some cases, no reimbursement at all.

That’s a significant tradeoff given that many hospitals operate on thin margins. Hartford HealthCare generated an operating margin of about 2.8% in fiscal 2025, according to audited financial statements.

“The bottom line is, this is about making healthcare more affordable,” Flaks said. “It’s about making it more accessible, and it’s about making it better.”

Flaks said Hartford HealthCare is positioned to absorb the project’s long-term debt costs because of years of financial discipline and strong operating performance.

Hartford HealthCare currently maintains an A+ bond rating with a stable outlook from Fitch Ratings, which cited the organization’s strong market position and improving operating performance.

Hartford HealthCare reported positive financial results in each of the last two fiscal years, posting operating income of $201.4 million on $7.1 billion in revenue in fiscal 2025, compared with operating income of $133.6 million on $6.5 billion in revenue a year earlier, according to audited financial statements.

“We have carefully managed our financial strength for many years, and have put ourselves in this position to make this investment,” Flaks said.

Capturing care

Hogan, the healthcare consultant, said large health systems increasingly are investing in infrastructure and patient access as they compete to keep more care within their own networks.

He cited a 2025 report from healthcare consulting firm Vizient that found the typical health system captures less than half of a patient’s total healthcare spending. According to the report, a 1% increase in loyal patients — those who repeatedly return to the same hospital or health system for care — can generate “a $40 million revenue lift for a $2 billion health system.”

Hogan said many of the nation’s largest health systems are investing in modern facilities, expanded outpatient access and private patient rooms in an effort to attract and retain aging baby boomers and commercially insured patients.

He said Hartford HealthCare has also spent decades improving both quality metrics and patient experience, helping position it competitively against rival systems.

“Basically, all of their hospitals now are ‘A’ quality” as measured by Leapfrog safety grades, Hogan said. “They focused on that.”

Flaks said the Hartford campus overhaul is especially significant because Hartford HealthCare has not undertaken a project of this scale since construction of the original high-rise hospital tower on Seymour Street in 1947.

State Sen. Saud Anwar (D-South Windsor), co-chair of the state legislature’s Public Health Committee and a physician, said he welcomes Hartford HealthCare’s investment, particularly plans to expand and improve the emergency department.

“The number and kinds of people in our waiting rooms are increasing,” he said. “We have to have our physical infrastructure and intellectual infrastructure ready to take care of people’s needs.”

But Anwar said whether the project will lower healthcare costs is “a different question,” noting that hospitals face broader financial pressures, including Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates that often fail to cover the full cost of care.

“You want to provide the best care at the best time at the best place,” he said. “That’s the principle.”


House committee agrees to $580B surface transportation legislation

Transportation and Infrastructure Committee leaders on Sunday agreed to a five-year, $580 billion surface transportation bill that directs $65 billion to rail programs and $41 billion to discretionary grant programs.

The bill authorizes a total of $87.6 billion from the mass transit account of the Highway Trust Fund over fiscal years 2027 to 2031, an increase from $69.8 billion allocated in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. 

Amtrak would receive grants of $10.4 billion over five years for operations on the Northeast Corridor and $20.7 billion for its national network. The legislation prohibits any federal grants, awards or financial assistance to the California high-speed rail project for two years while a working group determines whether the project can meet the requirements outlined in the 2008 voter-approved bond measure allocating funds for the California High-Speed Rail Authority.

The proposed legislation, crafted in the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, continues a series of multiyear surface transportation programs dating back to 1978.

Committee Chairman Sam Graves, R-Mo., and the committee’s Ranking Member, Rep. Rick Larsen, D-Wash., said in a joint release Sunday that they plan to formally introduce the legislation soon. Their goal is to have Congress send a final bill to the president before the current surface transportation authorization expires on Sept. 30, 2026.  

“This bill is not simply about honoring our past — it’s about moving forward and building upon the legacy of our nation’s infrastructure,” Graves said in a statement. “The bill also makes smart and targeted reforms to our surface transportation programs, focuses on strengthening our core infrastructure system, drives innovation, bolsters safety, ensures states have the flexibility they need, and cuts red tape to get projects built faster.”

To strengthen the Highway Trust Fund, the bill imposes an annual registration fee of $35 for hybrid vehicles and $130 for electric vehicles. Fees would increase by $5 each year starting in 2029, topping out at $50 for hybrids and $150 for EVs.

“While this bill does not include every priority, I am committed to building on the last bipartisan infrastructure law by creating good-paying transportation jobs, growing the economy and safely transporting people and goods across the country by road and rail,” Larsen said in a statement. 

The committee leaders said they plan to set an upcoming date for the bill’s markup, which will allow members to suggest changes or amendments.


May 19, 2026

CT Construction Digest Tuesday May 19, 2026

 EB seeking approval for first conversion projects at former Crystal Mall

Jack Lakowsky

Waterford — Electric Boat, the new owner of the former Crystal Mall property, is awaiting state traffic approval tied to its renovation project and is seeking town approval to approve conversions of old anchor stores into training centers.

EB wants to renovate the former Bed Bath & Beyond and Sears stores, according to Planning Director Mark Wujtewicz, who said he meets with EB officials weekly. The submarine maker has also applied for a building permit from the town.

Wujtewicz said last week the company seeks approval for "selective demolition" and conversions of the two former retailers. The Sears space would be made into permanent workforce training facility, while the shell of the Bed Bath & Beyond will be made into a temporary workforce training center.

"It would just be limited to this work," Wujtewicz said.

Wujtewicz said the company's conversion of the former mall, which officially closed its doors at the end of March after 40 years in business, is proceeding on schedule. He added that EB's purchase means the town has to rework its own long-term development plans and must abandon its vision of a mixed-use, business and residential operation.

EB purchased the mall property last year after pressure from the U.S. Navy to deliver submarines.

Moving some workers to Waterford would free up space in the Groton shipyard, which can’t expand because it has the Thames River on one side and neighborhoods on the other.

The Groton shipyard could then focus more on building submarines.

The company plans to begin renovating the mall as offices for its engineering, training and software development departments. It invested a total of $42.4 million to acquire the mall property.

Opened in 1984, the mall was once a busy regional destination where people could shop, eat and meet friends. Employees had to park at the Waterford Speedbowl during the Christmas season because every space had to be reserved for customers. In 2010, 140 stores occupied the once-bustling mall.

When the full transformation is complete, EB will occupy 542,000 square feet of space along Route 85.

In addition to the professional and business offices proposed, EB will use the building to house 50 classrooms for training and workforce development. Beginning in 2027, the company expects to employ up to 5,000 people on the 83-acre property, about 55 acres of which are developed.

The company plans to make changes to the Route 85 on- and off-ramps from I-95 to handle the increased traffic. EB Director of Communications and Public Affairs Myra Lee said she was not aware Monday whether the state had made a decision yet on a traffic permit for the project.

EB, which employs more than 24,000 workers in Groton, New London and North Kingstown, R.I.


NextEra-Dominion deal would put CT’s Millstone nuclear plant under new ownership

Andrew Larson

Connecticut’s largest power plant would change hands under a merger announced Monday, in which Florida-based NextEra Energy would acquire Dominion Energy, the owner of the Millstone Power Station in Waterford.

Millstone is the only operating nuclear plant in Connecticut, and its two reactors supply roughly half the state’s electricity and more than 90% of its carbon-free power, according to Dominion.

The deal, an all-stock transaction valued at about $66.8 billion according to Reuters, would transfer control of Millstone to NextEra.

NextEra, through a subsidiary, is the majority owner and operator of the Seabrook Station nuclear plant in New Hampshire, which sells its power into the regional grid operated by ISO New England, the same market Connecticut draws electricity from.

If the merger closes, the combined company would own both Millstone and Seabrook — meaning a single company would control all of the nuclear power generated inside Connecticut, along with a significant share of the regional nuclear supply that reaches Connecticut homes and businesses.

Seabrook is the second-largest nuclear plant in New England, behind Millstone.

Neither company’s announcement of the deal — nor its filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission — mentions Millstone, Seabrook, Connecticut or New England.

The companies framed the merger almost entirely around growth in the South and soaring electricity demand from data centers, particularly in Virginia, where Dominion runs a grid serving the world’s largest concentration of data centers.

The merged company would serve about 10 million customer accounts across Florida, Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina.

Connecticut is absent from that count because the combined company would not own a regulated utility serving Connecticut customers. Millstone sells its power into the regional market rather than serving a captive customer base.

The companies have proposed $2.25 billion in customer bill credits for ratepayers in Virginia and the Carolinas, where Dominion runs the local utilities.

The transaction requires approvals from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to transfer federal operating licenses to a new owner, along with clearances from federal antitrust regulators, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and utility commissions in Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina.

Since Millstone is not regulated by Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulatory Authority, a sale of the plant’s corporate parent doesn’t require a PURA proceeding.

The companies expect to close in 12 to 18 months, though the agreement allows the timeline to stretch toward 2028 if regulatory approvals lag.

Connecticut buys a large share of Millstone’s output under long-term contracts that expire in 2029, and the state is in the middle of a procurement to line up new clean-energy supply for the years that follow.

Dominion submitted proposals to keep selling Millstone’s power to Connecticut into the next decade, and state energy officials expect to name winning bids later this year — potentially while the acquisition is underway.

The state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection said it will assess what, if any, implications the merger could have for ongoing proceedings.

The state Office of Consumer Counsel, which represents ratepayers, said the deal so far looks like a change in ownership that may not significantly alter how Millstone runs or what it costs.

“Based on the limited details currently available to the public, the proposed acquisition of Dominion Energy by NextEra Energy appears primarily to be a change in ownership, and as such the core operations and associated costs of Millstone Power Station may not materially change, but are subject to the details of the transaction,” the office said.

The office said it would keep watching as more becomes known.

“OCC will continue monitoring as additional information about the transaction becomes available, particularly as it relates to future contracts, financing structures and costs ultimately borne by ratepayers,” it said.


$150M plan seeks to redevelop aging CT cineplex into 300+ apartments, entertainment venue

Kenneth R. Gosselin 

Four months ago, the end credits rolled for the last movie shown at the Apple Xtreme Cinema, the lights were turned off and the cineplex boarded up.

But now, there are once again scenes of coming attractions.

A massive redevelopment planned for the 13-acre multiplex on New Park Avenue in Hartford — a project that could reach an estimated price tag of $150 million — could include more than 300 mixed-income apartments, with rents ranging from affordable — targeted at low-to-moderate income households — to market-rate, officials familiar with the plans said.

The apartments would be built on what are now parking lots to the north and south of the theater, bookending a renovated cineplex that could retain a couple of movie screens alongside a new restaurant and bar — perhaps offering wood-fired pizza — and a game arcade. In the rear of the cineplex structure— opened in 2000 and also operated under such brands as Crown and Bow Tie —  space would be converted to self-storage.

The project also would put to a new use a cineplex built for another era when multiple screens responded to the demand by the movie-going public. The movie industry was battered by the pandemic and increasing competition from the small screen.

Construction on “Edge 400” — its name drawn from the cineplex’s location near the town line with West Hartford in the city’s Parkville neighborhood — could begin by early 2027, bringing new attention to a less considered gateway to the city.

Construction would be divided into three parts, and it is likely to start on the southern parking lot where the focus is affordable and workforce housing — a slice of housing that the state has sought to encourage as Connecticut grapples with a housing affordability crisis.

“The intent here is to serve the workforce who can’t afford the high rents that exist in the city and the surrounding area,” said Marc Daigle, a principal in Massachusetts-based Emerald Development Group, a partner in the planned residential rentals both to the north and south of the cineplex. “We envision these for folks who work in the city, folks who work in some of the small businesses or hospitals where people just can’t find housing.”

Daigle said he has had discussions with local hospitals, and they have been supportive of efforts to develop housing with rents that are more within reach of their employees.

Eventually, there would be a mix of about 180 one- and two-bedroom units in three, four-story, structures on the southern parking lot, but initially building would focus on two.

If financing were to fall into place, the redevelopment at the 330 New Park Ave. property would move past previous failed efforts — dating back to 2020 — that also included housing and, at one point, a further downsizing of the theater in favor of a venue with arcade games, ax throwing, entertainment and a bar.

On the opposite side of the cineplex, two, similarly-styled buildings would encompass about 120 market-rate apartments on what is now the northern parking lot. It is possible that development on the three parts could overlap, each taking 18-24 months to complete.

‘Concrete jungle’

The cineplex redevelopment also could boost efforts to further encourage transit-oriented development along CTfastrak, the rapid bus service running between New Britain and downtown Hartford. The bus line runs behind the cineplex property.

According to Google maps, the distance from the planned apartments at the cineplex to the nearest busway station at Flatbush Avenue is an 11-minute walk or four minutes on a bicycle.

Jeffrey P. Cohen, a professor of finance and Kinnard Real Estate Scholar at the University of Connecticut in Storrs, said development now planned for the movie theater property fits squarely with the goals of transit-oriented development.

“Ideally, you want to have residential development so people can walk to transit services, rather than owning cars and use transit to commute,” said Cohen, who has led studies at UConn on transit-oriented development for the state transportation department. “Also having places to shop, eat and have entertainment within walking distance is another part of transit-oriented development, creating a walkable community.”

The plans call for the apartment buildings to be constructed much closer to New Park Avenue, in contrast to the cineplex, which is set back from the street.

“So, New Park does not appear as a TOD-type corridor, right now,” Jack Benjamin, Hartford’s director of economic development, said. “This is a concrete jungle, and it’s a sea of pavement. There’s an interest by the developers to bring a bit more greenery and make the actual sidewalk walking experience a little more attractive.”

Westchester County, N.Y.-based Diamond Properties has owned the entire cineplex property since a couple of years before the pandemic hit in 2020.

““Diamond Properties is excited to be continuing work to advance plans for a mixed-use redevelopment that prioritizes affordable workforce housing, alongside market-rate apartments and a community entertainment destination,” Diamond said, in a statement. “This is one of Hartford’s most visible gateway sites and it creates a historic opportunity for an exciting new ‘live, work, play’ community that will provide new housing opportunities for residents of Hartford and the region into the future.”

New development catalyst?

Emerald Development, a development consultant, is partnering with Tampa, FL-based Southport Financial Services, which would develop the affordable housing. Southport, according to its web site, has developed more than 100 affordable and workforce properties nationally since its founding in 1995.

Crucial to the financing of the affordable rentals would be low-income housing tax credits that the developers are seeking through the state. A decision on their application could come as early as this week.

Emerald also is in the midst of lining up financing for the market-rate units and another development partner. Daigle said there have been discussions with another group, but he declined to identify them.

Daigle knows the property well having been a partner in Waltham, Mass-based Dakota Partners. Dakota tried unsuccessfully to pursue both market-rate and affordable housing, with a coalition of investors never coming together.  Two years ago, Dakota, which completed two office to apartment conversions a decade ago, walked away from the cineplex project.

Daigle said he kept in touch with the family-owned Diamond Properties and, now, under Emerald, a development company he founded, he is moving forward with the housing portions of the redevelopment.

If successful, the redeveloped movie theater could provide a further catalyst to more closely integrating Hartford’s Parkville with the adjoining West Hartford neighborhood. Just behind the cineplex and beyond the route of the busway, are 34 acres once occupied by a scrap metal yard acquired by the city in a foreclosure in 2021.

The former junkyard is seen as ripe for future redevelopment, but an environmental clean-up is clearly a costly hurdle to be cleared.

Even so, the 34 acres could form a connection back to the heart of Parkville and Bartholomew Street. Bartholomew Street — in recent years considered the spine of an arts and innovation district — leads to the successful Parkville Market and Real Art Ways, the contemporary arts center now in the midst of a $24 million expansion.

Benjamin, Hartford’s economic development director, said the busway does present a barrier between the cineplex property and the heart of Parkville. But the challenge isn’t insurmountable, Benjamin said.

“I don’t think that’s out of the question,” Benjamin said. “You just have to find a way to get across the fastrak busway. There’s conversation you’d have to have with the state.”


Greenwich approves $41 million Dorothy Hamill rink despite push to cut funding

Eric Bedner

GREENWICH — Members of the Greenwich Representative Town Meeting overwhelmingly voted last week to approve a $542 million budget that includes $41.2 million for a new Dorothy Hamill ice skating rink, despite an attempt to eliminate most funding for the new rink.

The $542 million overall budget is roughly an increase of $21 million, or 4.1%, from the previous budget and includes a 3.6% increase in the town’s operating budget. It was approved 170-13, with one abstention.

The 4.1% overall increase aims to address budget deficiencies in previous years, Board of Estimate and Taxation Chairman David Weisbrod said.

Members of the RTM also approved a $92 million capital budget, including $41.2 million for a new Hamill ice skating rink, despite an attempt by some members to cut nearly all the rink funding.

RTM members from Districts 9 and 10 attempted to cut $38.5 million from the rink project — leaving only $2.7 million for final planning and architectural designs — but the proposal failed by a margin of roughly 90 votes.

Those in favor of the cut argued the approval of both design and construction costs at the same time limits the oversight of the RTM as the project advances and costs potentially increase.

Those against cutting the rink funding, however, said it has been thoroughly vetted, will provide a safe and modern space for residents and visitors, and was the result of a transparent process.

Considering construction costs continue to climb, supporters of the rink also argued waiting would increase costs in the long term.

First Selectman Fred Camillo said the debate regarding the rink has been ongoing for more than 50 years and the condition of the current rink is “kind of an embarrassment to the town.”

“It’s about time to get it done,” he said. “It’s been thoroughly vetted.”

Weisbrod noted the members of his board unanimously approved the budget, adding he’s “particularly proud” of the multi-year capital projects plan.

A proposal to cut $2.4 million from the total $4 million for a new pool at Greenwich High School also failed.

RTM members did, however, vote to cut $100,000 in design funding for the redevelopment of Roger Sherman Baldwin Park, leaving $150,000 to allow the Department of Public Works to analyze relocating a Parks and Recreation Department building on the site.

The $207 million Board of Education budget, an increase of 3.1% from the previous budget, is driven largely by contractual wage increases that represent 76% of the total education budget.

Pupil transportation is also expected to significantly increase by 18%, or $2.3 million, from the current fiscal year.

The schools administration was able to find some savings to offset cost increases, including cutting $1.3 million by eliminating 11.5 full-time equivalent positions as enrollment trends show a decline.

No layoffs are expected, however, as the positions will be eliminated by natural attrition, such as retirement.

Overall, “it was a very productive year with the budget,” Camillo said. “I think we came to a good conclusion.”

Members of the RTM also overwhelmingly voted to approve a $70 million bonding package.


May 18, 2026

CT Construction Digest Monday May 18, 2026

Waterbury school officials propose $100 million preschool center: 'The right thing to do'

Michael Gagne

WATERBURY — School officials are seeking to build a new center at an estimated cost of $100 million that would replace Bucks Hill Preschool in Waterbury’s far north end as well as a smattering of preschool programs in other schools.

The proposed preschool facility would bring 25 classrooms dedicated to students 3 years old and younger, as well as space for 3-year-old students with special needs, into a single space centrally located in the city. The exact space has yet to be determined.

“We’d like to bring these programs together in one specialized location where we could service over 163 general ed and 353 special ed students,” Superintendent Darren Schwartz told the Board of Education earlier in May. 

He proposed building a facility that would house 25 classrooms and two sensory rooms, as well as play group opportunities for children under the age of 3.

The play groups allow the youngest children to interact in a natural setting and help parents “understand what’s naturally developmentally appropriate for students — especially ones with special needs,” Schwartz said. 

Building designed for preschoolers

The center would have classrooms equipped with what Schwartz described as “strategic acoustic systems” as well as child-friendly lighting and colors, outdoor learning experiences and student-friendly bathrooms. 

The entire building would be designed with preschool-age children in mind, including classroom walls and windows designed “so students can actually see outside,” Schwartz said. 

The superintendent said he also envisions a program that would offer young children with special needs increased opportunities to interact with their peers, as well as full school day options, not just half-day, for 4-year-old pre-kindergarten students. 

Currently, 58 students in Bucks Hill’s pre-K-three program received special needs services at a fractured schedule. That means they come in two to three days a week for only a half day, Schwartz said. 

The program has 15 teachers, 15 paraprofessionals, two speech pathologists and a social worker. It has limited space to provide therapeutic programming and sensory equipment for students that need them, he said. 

The portable classroom spaces also have far too few student-friendly bathrooms and its hallways are congested with equipment, Schwartz. 

“There are two total bathrooms in the portables,” he said, noting there are 10 classrooms in those units, which are now more than 25 years old.  

Fulfilling a longtime need

Schwartz acknowledged that the district current has “a lot of preschools” but said some of them are aging and in need of updates. 

With the proposed center, the district is looking to consolidate the Bucks Hill program with two classes now housed at Maloney Interdistrict Magnet School, along with two classes each at Sprague and Kingsbury elementary schools. 

The district has long needed to bolster the preschool space it provides, Schwartz said, referencing a facility study completed in 2004 that said demand for preschool programs in the city had exceeded capacity. 

The report also stated Bucks Hill’s portable classrooms were showing “significant signs of deterioration,” he said. 

“That was 22 years ago,” he said. The study's overall recommendation was to build a dedicated pre-K center that would allow for program expansion.

“So, this isn’t just like Darren’s idea, thinking, ‘Hey, I’ve just stepped on the scene thinking this was a good idea,’” Schwartz told the Board of Education. “The studies that have been done on the district show it. Your eyeballs will show it if you go up to the portables yourself. And then just multiple meetings with the educators over time have shown this.”

He described the project as “the right thing to do for our most vulnerable population: our youngest students and special needs.”

The district should act now to take advantage of state reimbursements, particularly for early childhood education spaces, he said. 

Waterbury’s state reimbursement rate for school construction projects is 79%, according to the Connecticut Department of Administrative Services. 

According to DAS, construction projects of an elementary school building or expansion that includes space for early childhood care and education are eligible to receive an additional 15% reimbursement. 

The city could net a possible 94% reimbursement for the project if it applies to the state now, Schwartz estimated. The proposal needs approvals from both the Board of Education and the Board of Aldermen. 

The city would have to commit to bonding $100 million for the project’s estimated cost qualify for the reimbursement.

But the money would not be bonded, Waterbury Mayor Paul Pernerewski said in response to a question from a Board of Education member.

“The way the process works is with that number going forward, if we get approved, it allows us to enter into contracts. We get the money back from the state. We would never issue $100 million worth of bonds,” he said. 

“If it were at 94% (reimbursement), it would be $6 million,” Pernerewski said. “But if we don’t get the funding approved by the state, we’re not going to go forward, ourselves, with a $100 million bond authorization.” 


Portland voters approve spending $109 million on school renovations across district

Crystal Elescano

PORTLAND — Residents voted in favor of the town’s $109 million school construction project during the recent referendum, approving a plan to renovate and expand multiple schools across the district. 

“These are exiting times, very exciting times,” First Selectman Michael Pelton said. 

Turnout for the referendum on Monday was higher than expected, with 1,867 residents voting in favor of the project and 350 voting against it, Pelton said. 

“The biggest takeaway about this project is that Portland is lucky,” he said. “It was well thought out, and we will have great schools that bring families to Portland.” 

The Board of Selectmen, at its regular meeting next week, will set the tax rate and approve resolutions to begin forming a building committee for the school project. 

The town and school district expect to begin the project in the summer of 2027, Pelton said. 

In the project to upgrade its aging school buildings, the district will: renovate and expand Valley View Elementary into a pre-k to grade 2 school; renovate Gildersleeve Elementary into a grade 3 to 5 school; and make various improvements at Portland Middle School and High School.  

The district will ultimately close Brownstone Intermediate School, which currently serves grades 5 and 6. 

According to the district, the work on Valley View is estimated to cost $47.5 million, with projected state reimbursement totaling $33.3 million. Renovations at Gildersleeve are expected to cost $52 million, with $29.2 million in anticipated state reimbursement funding. Improvements at the middle and high schools are estimated at $8 million, with a projected $4 million reimbursement. 

The town’s estimated share of the total project, including bond issuance costs, is $41.9 million, according to town officials. 

Charles Britton, superintendent of the Portland Public Schools, said the district has about a year to prepare for the work and said students will remain in their current schools during the next school year. 

In the meantime, the district plans to submit its grant application to the state before June 30, he said. 

In the fall, the town plans to hire an architect and select a construction company in preparation for breaking ground in the summer of 2027, Britton said. 

“I will be working with my administrators, parents, teachers to get ready for a very big swing of students,” Britton said. 

At the start of the 2027-28 school year, Valley View Elementary School will close for construction for two school years, with students in prekindergarten through second grade moving to Gildersleeve School, he said. 

Students in grades 3 through 5 will move to Brownstone Intermediate School, while sixth graders will attend Portland Middle School. 

In fall 2029, students in prekindergarten through second grade will move into the newly renovated Valley View building. Gildersleeve will then close for renovations during the 2029-30 and 2030-31 school years, he said.

Once that project is complete and students return to Gildersleeve in fall 2031, Brownstone Intermediate School will be turned over to the town, which will decide on the future use of the building, Britton said.

Previously, the town had proposed a “mega school” elementary project that failed at referendum, Pelton said. Although that proposal would have cost less, the community did not support it, he said. 

“In a way, I’m glad that one failed because the new plan is better, more comprehensive and we get more money back from the state,” he said. “It all worked out timing-wise.” 

The town and school district listened to concerns about the proposed mega school, Pelton said, and considered the community’s educational needs while developing the new project.