October 31, 2019

CT Construction Digest Thursday October 31, 2019

Danbury border tolls proposal dead, Marconi says
Rob Ryser
A controversial proposal to put tolls at Danbury’s border with New York on Interstate 84 is dead, Ridgefield First Selectman Rudy Marconi said.
Marconi says he has received Gov. Ned Lamont’s assurance twice this month that general tolling on the Merritt Parkway, Interstate 95, Interstate 91, and Interstate 84 “will not be implemented as was originally planned.”“This means there will be no border tolls - or tolls of any type - in the Danbury area and no possible diversion of traffic into Ridgefield due to tolls,” Marconi said in a prepared statement.
Marconi said he was first informed by Lamont that there would be no border tolls on Oct. 19.
“This was confirmed again during a call with the governor's office on Oct. 29,” Marconi said in a prepared statement.
Lamont’s assurance to Marconi that tolls are being considered only for “superstructures like a new bridge or other similar features that require large-scale construction” is good news for Danbury.
Danbury’s City Council passed a resolution on Oct. 4 against implementing tolls.
“Hopefully we can send a clear message to Hartford here tonight that Danbury and people in Danbury do not want tolls,” council member John Esposito III said.

Toll opposition ramps up again as Lamont pitches new plan
Christine Stuart
HARTFORD — No Tolls CT, which registered as a lobbying organization back in June, is sending out mailers to thousands of Connecticut residents.
It’s the latest step in their effort to prevent officials from erecting electronic tolls on a dozen bridges or highway choke points.
The mailer says “Connecticut wants to tax you for driving to work.” It includes bullet points about how much money was diverted before reaching the Special Transportation Fund and how much Connecticut spends to maintain and repair its roads.
Gov. Ned Lamont is meeting with legislative leaders this week to get their final feedback on his 10-year, $18-billion proposal to improve Connecticut’s roads, rail, and public transit. Lawmakers were privately briefed on a proposal that reduces the number of tolls from 50 to around a dozen.
In a letter the group sent to lawmakers last week, Patrick Sasser, founder of No Tolls CT, said they appreciate the reduction in gantries, but still won’t support any proposal that includes tolling based on their lack of trust in government.
Following an unrelated event in Waterbury Tuesday, Lamont said they are trying to fix the choke points in Connecticut’s transportation system in a fiscally responsible way. He said he’s meeting with lawmakers and next week plans to make it public.
“I think people are honestly giving it a second look,” Lamont said. “We got a lot of feedback from the legislature the last time around.”
Lamont’s first proposal made in February didn’t gain much steam and was never raised for a vote in either chamber.
But Lamont believes there’s a better understanding of the problem.
“We convinced people it’s not a problem that will go away,” Lamont said.
 Lamont said that in order to access the low-interest loans from the federal government the state is going to have to provide a revenue stream and some of that will come from tolls that will be paid, at least in part, by out-of-state drivers.
Ridgefield First Selectman Rudy Marconi, who endorsed tolls when he ran for governor back in 2010, said Lamont assured him that general tolling on I-95, I-91, the Merritt Parkway, and I-84 will not be implemented, which means there will be no border tolls in the Danbury area and no possible diversion of traffic into Ridgefield because of tolls.
“The governor told me that the only tolling currently being contemplated was for superstructures like a new bridge or other similar features that require large-scale construction,” Marconi said Tuesday in a press release. “In those instances, any tolling would be local to the project and would remain in place only until the bond was paid off.”
Sources who have been briefed on Lamont’s proposal said all the tolls would be removed once the billions in improvements were made over the 10-year period. Sasser and others have said that Lamont’s decision not to release municipal funding for road improvements could be a mistake.
Lamont has declined to release the money through the Bond Commission until he can reach a deal on his transportation plan.
“The governor is playing a dangerous game as we head into winter,” Sasser said. “Attempting to withhold money promised to municipalities for things like snow-plowing to gain support for his new plan is more trick than treat.”
Kevin Maloney, a spokesman for the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities, said that towns and cities have been dipping into their reserves and others are holding off on projects until the state approves the funding. Many town officials are concerned about what adjustments they will need to make in the next month or so as winter approaches and the need for road salt and other supplies increases.

State money will fund improvements on Myrtle, East Main streets in New Britain
Ciara Hooks
NEW BRITAIN - The city has secured $3.67 million from the state Department of Transportation’s Local Transportation Capital Improvement Program to make necessary improvements to East Main and Myrtle streets. The contract has been awarded to Martin Laviero Contractor Inc. of Bristol.
“This critical funding will help us continue implementing our award-winning Complete Streets and Downtown Livability Master Plan,” said Mayor Erin Stewart, who announced the state funding Wednesday.
The plan is aimed at creating a safe, more pedestrian-friendly and attractive environment downtown.
This construction is part of Phase 6 of the reconstruction project of East Main Street between Martin Luther King Boulevard and Main Street.
“We are thrilled to continue the project in front of New Brite Plaza and make necessary road improvements in the area,” said Stewart.
The work includes milling and overlaying of Myrtle Street between Main Street and Washington Avenue. It also entails the replacement of catch basin tops and installation of new catch basins, new granite curbing, and new concrete and brick sidewalks and pedestrian ramps to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act standards.
Further, the existing traffic signal at the Route 72 ramp will be replaced and there will be installation of new signs and pavement markings, removal of impacted existing trees and installation of new trees.
Future phases of the city’s master involve work on Columbus Boulevard and Washington Street and Chestnut Street near Harry Truman Overpass.
Work the latest phase is expected to begin Friday.

Groton seventh-graders get first look at their future school
Kimberly Drelich
Seventh-graders from West Side Middle School walk across the construction site of the new Groton Middle School after taking a tour Wednesday, Oct. 30, 2019, by the construction company, O&G Industries.  Earlier they and seventh-graders from Cutler Arts and Humanities Magnet Middle School were given a presentation by project manager Amy Samuelson, of the architectural firm SLAM, showing what the school will look like when finished in 2020. (Dana Jensen/The Day)
Groton — Wearing neon vests, safety glasses and hard hats, seventh-graders trekked through the future Groton Middle School on Wednesday to take their first look at what will be their new school.
At the construction site adjacent to Robert E. Fitch High School, workers were busy offloading materials into the building, pouring concrete and installing plumbing, electrical and mechanical components for the consolidated middle school slated to be completed by the end of June.
Project managers, along with school officials, guided about 30 West Side STEM Magnet Middle School students on a tour.
"Where we’re standing right now is the future cafeteria of this building," Ryan Benoit, project manager with O&G Industries, told the students as they stood in a large, unfinished space, where a worker stood on a scissor lift. Benoit then showed them where other features will be, including the theater room, kitchen, classrooms and administration offices.
The students then walked up to the second floor, where Benoit pointed out ductwork and piping that, once the project is completed, will be out of sight behind walls or above ceilings.
In one part of the building, the students looked down to the courtyard where an outdoor classroom is planned. West Side teachers Laura Irace, Lisa Lambert and Rachel Lorinser are designing the outdoor classroom with students, along with colleagues at Cutler Arts and Humanities Magnet Middle School, Superintendent Michael Graner said.
"I feel like it's going to be a good school to go to," said Reese Bogue, a seventh-grader at West Side STEM Magnet Middle School. "It's very big, so there’s going to be a lot of classrooms and a lot of new people I'm going to meet. I'm excited about that."
“I’m really excited for next year, and I wish they also had maybe ninth and tenth grade because I want to stay in this school more than one year," said Layan Faraj, 12, a seventh-grader at West Side, adding that the school is really big.
She said she's so glad she had the opportunity to get to go inside the middle school and meet the architects and see what they do. They even talked about their education, too.
Lorinser said it seems the new building will incorporate both of the town's two current middle schools really well and their different themes and pathways to support both STEM — or science, technology, engineering and math — and arts and humanities.
"It was very fun to get a first-hand view of what the space is going to look like," she said.
Earlier on Wednesday morning, seventh-graders from Cutler and West Side learned about the new middle school during a presentation in the auditorium at Fitch High School, and lined up to ask questions. A group of Cutler students also went on a tour of the site, Graner said.
The new school will have a four-story academic wing, as well as spaces for the gymnasium, the library media center, a cafeteria that will seat about 360 students, a black box theater, makerspace and other features, Amy Samuelson, project manager for the architecture firm The SLAM Collaborative, said.
There will be a separate entrance for school buses and a separate entrance for visitors and parent drop-offs to keep the traffic safe and controlled, she said.
School buses will come in through the Fitch High School entrance and then make a turn into the middle school site, Graner said. Parents will enter through the Ella T. Grasso Technical High School driveway and then continue onto a new road, which will be constructed, to the middle school.
Graner said Wednesday's visit was six years in the making and began with the vision of bringing all the middle school students together into one state-of-the art facility to provide quality education.
The U.S. Department of Education officially approved that Groton Middle School can pursue a STEAM — science, technology, engineering, arts and math — program, which will blend together the best elements of STEM and arts and humanities, Graner said. Children will have the opportunity to pursue a STEM pathway, or an arts and humanities pathway, or both, he said.
Graner said he told the seventh-graders that the construction of the new middle school represents the beginning of a whole new chapter in the history of Groton Public Schools — and they are going to play a major role in that.
As eighth-graders when the school opens next year, they will set the tone of the school, he said. He called on them to be both smart and kind. He said one of his teachers once told him the goal of education is to develop children who are smart — so they can solve problems facing the world — and kind, because the world needs respect and civility.
Graner said he asked the students to provide suggestions to their teachers about the kinds of clubs and programs they would like to see in the school, so the students will have a strong voice in the planning process.
School officials will be planning this year for the transition to the new middle school next year. The school will open on Sept. 8, 2020, for the 2020-21 school year, he said.
Graner said he briefed both Cutler and West Side teachers on the project and its progress. Teachers were asked to sign up for subcommittees — on topics related to the transition, including scheduling, rules and regulations, and outreach to parents — that will meet throughout this year.  
"More than Words," a diversity club, also is helping to ensure the transition is smooth, including by working directly with sixth- and seventh-graders, Graner said.

Developer breaks ground on $200M Avon Village Center project
Sean Teehan
Construction on a $200 million mixed-use development in Avon that has been held up in the permitting process for more than a year officially kicked off Wednesday.
“The process of permitting is a difficult process, you have to go through a whole set of state and local processes,” said Kelly Coates, CEO of Rhode Island developer Carpionato Group, which is helming the Avon Village Center project that is being described as a “live-work-play gathering space” located on the former Ensign Bickford campus along Route 44. “It’s like pregnancy: pain for a purpose.”
The Carpionato Group marked the beginning of the project’s first of five phases, which will consist of five new retail buildings totaling about 119,000 square feet, anchored by a new 45,000-square-foot Whole Foods Market.
Phase I should be finished before Thanksgiving next year, and space will be filled by local merchants as well as regional and national businesses, Coates said, though he declined to name any potential tenants.
While the initial phase will only include retail space, phase II of the project will include office and residential units, the developer said. The whole project spans 97 acres and will include public spaces like a park and the newly redeveloped Farmington Valley Bikeway, the developer said. The $200 million estimate on the project is likely on the low side, Coates added.
Coates said he expects the entire project will be completed in five years.




 

October 30, 2019

CT Construction Digest Wednesday October 30, 2019

Legislative Leaders Get Briefed In On Transportation Plan With Fewer Tolls

Gov. Ned Lamont is meeting with legislative leaders this week to get their final feedback on his 10-year, $18-billion proposal to improve Connecticut’s roads, rail, and public transit. Lawmakers were privately briefed on a proposal that reduces the number of tolls from 50 to around a dozen.
In a letter the group sent to lawmakers last week, Patrick Sasser, founder of No Tolls CT, said they appreciate the reduction in gantries, but still won’t support any proposal that includes tolling based on their lack of trust in government.
Following an unrelated event in Waterbury Tuesday, Lamont said they are trying to fix the choke points in Connecticut’s transportation system in a fiscally responsible way. He said he’s meeting with lawmakers and next week plans to make it public.
“I think people are honestly giving it a second look,” Lamont said. “We got a lot of feedback from the legislature the last time around.”
Lamont’s first proposal made in February didn’t gain much steam and was never raised for a vote in either chamber.
But Lamont believes there’s a better understanding of the problem.
“We convinced people it’s not a problem that will go away,” Lamont said.
Lamont said that in order to access the low-interest loans from the federal government the state is going to have to provide a revenue stream and some of that will come from tolls that will be paid, at least in part, by out-of-state drivers.
Ridgefield First Selectman Rudy Marconi, who endorsed tolls when he ran for governor back in 2010, said Lamont assured him that general tolling on I-95, I-91, the Merritt Parkway, and I-84 will not be implemented, which means there will be no border tolls in the Danbury area and no possible diversion of traffic into Ridgefield because of tolls.
“The governor told me that the only tolling currently being contemplated was for superstructures like a new bridge or other similar features that require large-scale construction,” Marconi said Tuesday in a press release. “In those instances, any tolling would be local to the project and would remain in place only until the bond was paid off.”
Sources who have been briefed on Lamont’s proposal said all the tolls would be removed once the billions in improvements were made over the 10-year period.
Sasser and others have said that Lamont’s decision not to release municipal funding for road improvements could be a mistake.
Lamont has declined to release the money through the Bond Commission until he can reach a deal on his transportation plan.
“The governor is playing a dangerous game as we head into winter,” Sasser said. “Attempting to withhold money promised to municipalities for things like snow-plowing to gain support for his new plan is more trick than treat.”
Kevin Maloney, a spokesman for the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities, said that towns and cities have been dipping into their reserves and others are holding off on projects until the state approves the funding. Many town officials are concerned about what adjustments they will need to make in the next month or so as winter approaches and the need for road salt and other supplies increases.

Final Norwich Hospital cleanup now pegged at $9 million
Claire Bessette   
Preston — The final cost to finish the environmental cleanup of the former Norwich Hospital property is now projected at $9 million, and while town and Mohegan tribal leaders hope for a quick response to their request for state funding, the issue is tied up in the stalled overall state budget bond package yet to be put before legislators for a vote.
Town and tribal officials, local state legislators and representatives from the governor’s office, the state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection and Department of Economic and Community Development participated in a 90-minute telephone conference call Monday to discuss the town’s funding request and the delayed schedule to finish the cleanup and turn the property over to Mohegan Gaming & Entertainment.
Chuck Bunnell, chief of staff for the Mohegan tribe, said the tribe is working on “some exciting” potential projects at the property, and the Tribal Council is receiving “some pressure” from potential developers seeking time estimates for the final cleanup.
“Everyone is a little anxious,” Bunnell, who participated in Monday’s call, said Tuesday. “Already, it’s longer than we anticipated, and more expensive.”
The cost estimate to finish the cleanup is now projected at $9 million, including a $2 million low-interest loan the town previously had received from the state and a $7 million grant request to the state. Town officials have said they will not tap into the loan until receiving a commitment from the state for enough grant funding to complete the cleanup.
The final projected cost soared beyond the $10 million state grant approved in 2017 after environmental cleanup crews discovered what Preston Redevelopment Agency Chairman Sean Nugent in the past has termed the worst-case scenario: much more extensive contamination beneath the surface than expected. In decades past, the state apparently used coal ash from its on-campus coal-burning power plant as sub-surface material beneath parking lots and roadways that snake throughout the campus.
And, if the town is required to remove all underground electrical wires, water and gas piping, that would add to the final cost as well, First Selectman Robert Congdon said Tuesday.
Although the development conceptual plan calls for mixed-use development, including senior housing, hotels, sports and recreation facilities and retail stores, the state is asking that the entire property be cleaned to the highest “residential standard,” officials said.
Congdon said participants in the phone conference call talked about the town’s dilemma of needing to finish the cleanup before turning over ownership of the property to Mohegan Gaming & Entertainment for its planned taxable major development.
But the DECD currently has no cleanup funding available for the Preston property or for three other state or former state properties on a priority list needing brownfields funding for cleanup.
In a follow-up to Monday’s meeting, DECD Deputy Commissioner David Kooris on Tuesday provided an update to state legislators in the conference call estimating the four properties need a combined rough estimate of $20 million in cleanup funds.
Kooris said Tuesday that Preston’s grant request must be part of the state bond package, because all other available cleanup funding has been exhausted. He also said the town’s environmental consultants will try to find ways to cut the cleanup costs.
State Sens. Cathy Osten and Paul Formica and state Reps. Mike France and Chris Soto participated in Monday’s call.
Formica, R-East Lyme, said funding for Preston is just one example of essential municipal funding held up in the stalled bond package he said should have been approved before July 1. He complained that minority-party Republican state legislators have not been provided information about the bond package, which also contains vital town road grant money and now money for municipalities to buy salt and winter supplies. The package has not been presented to legislators for a vote.
Osten, D-Sprague, said the legislature’s Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee has not met to discuss the bonding package, so there would be no proposal to present it to other legislators.
While action by the governor’s office or state legislature is out of the town’s or tribe’s control, the two parties were asked to meet with their respective environmental consulting firms — Tighe & Bond for the town — to try to find ways to cut the projected cleanup costs and tie the cleanup to a specific development process. 
Congdon said the tribe would be reluctant to alter its agreement with the town to take ownership before the cleanup is completed without first receiving a commitment from the state that if a development is ready to go forward, the state funding would be provided.
“It’s a double-edged sword,” Congdon said. “If you say: ‘Tribe, take the property as is now, and do the cleanup as part of development,’ there needs to be a mechanism to protect the tribe, some funding source in place for the cleanup.”
Congdon, Nugent and Bunnell all said they were encouraged by comments made during the phone conference that state agencies and legislators support the town’s request for state grants for the final cleanup.
“Everybody on the call was looking for a way to (say) ‘yes,’” Nugent said.
Formica and Osten echoed that position Tuesday.
“This is a state-created situation that needs a state-created solution,” Formica said Tuesday. “I’m sure that it would all be wrapped up in a bond package that is yet to be brought before the General Assembly for a vote and signed by a governor. There was consensus by those of us on the call to be supportive of our brownfields dollars to ensure that Preston needs to be made whole. The bond bill should have been done on July 1. The delay on the bond bill is causing all kinds of complications for cities and towns.”
“I think we should clean up the property to the standard we said we would,” Osten said. “We made a commitment to do that. They need to know, and they don’t want to borrow the $2 million without a commitment for the rest of it. We have to accept this.”
Congdon, who is set to retire Nov. 19 after 24 years as first selectman, said the parties hope to have answers to some questions, including whether cleanup costs can be reduced, within the next week.
“We’ve got all homework assignments to do this week, and we’ll get back together the end of this week or next week at the latest,” Congdon said.   

Hospital for Special Care breaks ground on autism unit expansion
Ciara Hooks
NEW BRITAIN - The Hospital for Special Care hosted a Groundbreaking Ceremony for an expansion on its Autism Inpatient Unit on Tuesday.
“So where did this all begin? When the Superintendent of the Consolidated School District of New Britain Dr. Doris Kurtz asked us in 2010-11 to assist the school district in accessing the needs of children with autism,” said Lynn Ricci, President and CEO of Hospital for Special Care. “We set out to access the situation and to mobilize resources in order to meet this need.”
The Hospital for Special Care opened Connecticut’s first and only inpatient unit specifically designed for children and teens on the autism spectrum in 2015.
“This is an incredible day,” said Mayor Erin Stewart. “It’s crazy to hear that there’s only 11 places in the entire country that do this and we are home to one right here in the city of New Britain and that makes me very proud of the work that’s being done here.”
The need for expansion became more prevalent as the community needs grew more quickly.
“One of the important reasons that I decided to take this on as a project was because I was amazed at the commitment and dedication of the staff in the autism unit and the conditions they had to work under to make sure they provided the services that they did,” said state Rep. Patricia Miller.
The expansion will be a 12 bed inpatient unit designed specifically for children and families. It features single private rooms for patients that are specifically designed to meet the needs and maximize the opportunities for parent education and training a key component to their success in the program. The new expanded program will serve up to 130 additional children and adolescents severely impacted by autism each year.
“This is hope for our families. We all know how much our families struggle especially families that need this type of service,” said state Rep. Catherine Abercrombie. “To be able to get this on the bond agenda as fast as she did thank you Pat. And just simply thank you to all of you for what you do not only for our kids on the spectrum, but also as a hospital.”
The project, designed by KaestleBoos Associates, and managed by Downes Construction, is funded in part by a $10 million bond award from the State of Connecticut and the hospital’s ongoing Superheroes for Autism $3 million capital campaign.
“The Community Foundation of Greater New Britain recently awarded this project with a $75,000 grant,” said Ricci.
Ricci recognized a few donors and gifted them a superhero cape with The Hospital of Special Care printed on it.
“It gives me great pleasure to acknowledge the generosity of Dr. Marie Gustin,” said Ricci. “This is just one of the many, many, many projects that Marie has invested in the hospital over many years. As a leadership donor to this initiative Dr. Gustin continues to really set a remarkable example of community stewardship.”
As of today the hospital has received $12.4 million towards their $13 million goal. They need about $650,000 more for the completion of the project.
“It’s great to be here this morning to help commemorate this milestone event,” said state Sen. Gennaro Bizzarro. “This expansion is just the latest example of a series of really transformational investments that the Hospital for Special Care has made not just in physical infrastructure, but in human infrastructure, as well.”
Ricci led Stewart along with a number of public officials, donors, patients, volunteers and employees out back to the grounds of the extension of the facility at 2150 Corbin Avenue, which is projected to be completed in 12 months.
10/29/2019
Lamont Inches Toward Transportation and Bond Package

HARTFORD, CT — Gov. Ned Lamont canceled another Bond Commission meeting last week. That leaves just one more scheduled meeting this year and millions in municipal projects hanging in the balance. 
Lamont said his administration is talking to legislative leaders on both sides of the aisle trying to come up with a plan that includes how much the state will spend on transportation and how much it will borrow for other infrastructure projects. He wants to complete the discussion on transportation before moving to the other projects on the bond agenda.
But it’s not easy working in the off-session with a part-time legislature.
“The legislative leaders are at the table every day,” Lamont said Monday.
House Minority Leader Themis Klarides, R-Derby, said that’s not true.
Klarides said she had to ask Lamont’s chief of staff for a briefing on the 10-year, $18 billion transportation plan that he’s cautiously pitching in private.
As far as the Bond Commission agenda is concerned, there has been no information beyond what was proposed in July when the Lamont administration and legislative Democrats were $100 million apart.
Office of Policy and Management Secretary Melissa McCaw said then that the governor would agree to increase his self-imposed borrowing limit from $1 billion to $1.3 billion. But that’s contingent on lawmakers making a firm commitment to $100 million per year of that general obligation bonding being used for transportation infrastructure.
Discussions have not moved beyond that point, according to legislative sources.
As far as transportation is concerned, “Nobody reached out to me,” Klarides said. “I had to ask for a meeting.”
She said by stating he’s not going to approve any bonding without an agreement on a transportation plan, Lamont is hurting cities and towns.
“You can’t hold people hostage,” Klarides said.
Lamont disagrees with the characterization of his negotiating tactic.
“The numbers have to add up,” Lamont said.
If the state borrows $700 million for transportation, then other projects on the bond agenda will have to be scaled back to account for the transportation spending. Lamont was referring to the Republicans’ plan to pay for transportation improvements without any tolls. 
Lamont is still waiting on Republican support for his new 10-year, $18 billion proposal that includes a limited number of tolls.
“Governor Ned Lamont is committed to upgrading Connecticut’s infrastructure in a way that benefits all residents and all cities and towns,” Max Reiss, Lamont’s spokesman, said. “He is actively working toward a solution with members of the General Assembly, and once there is agreement on a path forward, the priorities of individual cities and towns will be recognized in a negotiated bond bill. Absent that agreement, there is no purpose for a meeting of the bond commission.”
Lamont’s new transportation plan leverages federal dollars for transportation projects in strategic areas with the best opportunity for improved economic development.
However, in order to leverage that federal funding, Connecticut will need to give the feds a guaranteed revenue stream. The state can’t afford to bond the entire amount, so a small “user fee” or toll will be required even with federal help. The number of tolls would be scaled back substantially from Lamont’s initial proposal of 50 gantries to somewhere between 13 and 18, according to sources familiar with the proposal.
Lamont said he’s getting the final feedback from legislative leaders this week on the transportation proposal.
“I think we’ll have some pretty good news at the end of this week,” Lamont said.
Senate Republican Leader Len Fasano, R-North Haven, said he’s been back and forth with the administration over the numbers. He said he’s getting his questions answered and giving the administration feedback about the proposal.
“Whether they took the feedback remains to be seen,” Fasano said.
So far this year, the state has borrowed $1.22 billion in general obligation bonds and there is one more meeting scheduled on Dec. 13. Bonding runs on the calendar year, not the fiscal year.
The three main infrastructure funding streams for communities — road aid for towns,  Local Capital Improvement Projects, and grants for municipal projects — have not been approved yet.
“Infrastructure funding is critical to the public safety needs and economic development concerns of municipalities and their residents,” Connecticut Conference of Municipalities Executive Director Joe DeLong said. In September, DeLong said he appreciates the governor’s efforts to address Connecticut’s transportation needs and to secure the needed adequate funding, but these grants are part of the same infrastructure picture.  “Approving these three grants proves how essential the money coming out of the Bond Commission is — it is literally the roads we drive on and the bridges we cross over,” DeLong said. “It is a dangerous waiting game being played with municipalities regarding these infrastructure funds.”

Lamont asks for ‘profile-in-courage’ from GOP on transportation
Final legislative briefings are this week

Gov. Ned Lamont told reporters Monday he is getting “final feedback” this week from legislative leaders before releasing his second try at a transportation infrastructure plan, then he challenged House Republican skeptics to reconsider their opposition to tolls or any other form of new transportation revenue.
The Lamont administration has been engaged in a give-and-take with Senate Republicans over what is expected to be a 10-year, $20 billion plan, but House Minority Leader Themis Klarides, R-Derby, has doubled down on her caucus’s opposition to any tolls and, possibly, any new revenue sources.
“It’s going to take a profile in courage,” Lamont said, when asked about the chances of getting House GOP support.
“So, his definition of a profile in courage is if somebody agrees with him?” Klarides replied.
Lamont has greatly scaled back his original plan, which called for a comprehensive system of electronic highway tolls on the Merritt Parkway and Interstates 84, 91 and 95 that he predicted could raise about $800 million annually. Without new revenue, Lamont said, the state’s special transportation fund is projected to run in the red in the next four years.
The administration’s revised plan calls for tolls only on select bridges, with a relatively modest  charge for passenger vehicles and a premium for trucks, according to officials who have been briefed.
Lamont said he expected to have “some pretty good news by the end of the week,” but administration officials have taken to heart the advice of House Democrats to avoid releasing the plan on a Friday. Supporters say the plan should be released early in the work week, with a strategy for promoting it. 
The original plan was presented to the public in an op-ed piece published on a holiday weekend in February. In recent weeks, Lamont and his staff have been briefing legislators and stakeholders outside government.
“The governor has done a good job reaching out to external validators,” said Rep. Roland J. Lemar, D-New Haven, the co-chair of the Transportation Committee. “He is taking his lumps by going to them, hearing their thoughts on why it failed last time.”
Ryan Drajewicz, the governor’s chief of staff, said the rollout this time will be deliberate.
“This will be done in close and careful collaboration with the legislative leadership and chairs” of the relevant committees, Drajewicz said, adding, “And preferably with both sides of the aisle.”
Klarides was briefed by the administration last week on a plan that outlines projects necessary to keep the state’s highway and transit system in a state of good repair, as well as making enhancements to improve commuting times by speeding rail and eliminating highway bottlenecks. It would limit tolls and rely in part on low-cost financing from the federal government.
 “We have been open-minded to the other parts, the non-tolls parts,” Klarides said.
But the administration has not made the case, at least in Klarides’ view, that new revenue is necessary to keep the special transportation fund solvent, nor does she agree that everything on Lamont’s priority list must be tackled immediately.
Financed largely by fuel taxes, fees and sales taxes, the fund pays for operational costs at the Department of Transportation, the Department of Motor Vehicles and debt service on transportation infrastructure.
In a telephone interview, Klarides initially ruled out any new transportation revenue, then reconsidered and said, “I shouldn’t say that. We have to dig very deep in this process.
Klarides suggested the governor’s plan is too ambitious.
“Let’s put a reasonable package of projects together,” Klarides said. “Let’s just get real for a change. Let’s stop living in a fantasy world, where you do everything at once.”
When Lamont proposed his original tolls plan, Republicans countered with a call to redirect about $700 million of the state’s current general-obligation bonds for transportation, an approach that Lamont says would rob other needs of necessary funding and fail to provide a stable source of revenue.
The Lamont administration is seeking low-cost federal financing that requires a dedicated source of repayment, and the governor said Klarides and others must recognize that tolls are the only way to guarantee that out-of-state drivers who traverse Connecticut highways will pay for their upkeep.
Lamont said without new revenue sources, Connecticut would have to use bonding — borrowed money — to pay the debt service on the federal loans, “putting it on the credit card of the next generation.”
“If that’s the only deal she’ll consider, I’d like to think a couple of other Republicans may stand up and challenge that and say, ‘We have a better plan, a plan where out-of-staters pay for 40 percent of it, a plan that is limited, but a plan that fixes our transportation system and fixes our special transportation fund, which goes under water in the next four of five years,’ ” Lamont said.
Senate Minority Leader Len Fasano, R-North Haven, met a week ago with the governor and other administration officials to talk about the scope of what Lamont would like to do, as well as means of financing. He posed a series of issues and concerns, and the administration has been responding.
“You have to appreciate the fact he is trying his best to sort out some of the issues,” Fasano said.
 
NEW MILFORD — Construction is underway for the new Steers Center at Canterbury School.
The new building is 22,000 square feet and will open next fall. It will have innovation and digital analytics labs, flexible classrooms, a student center, cafe, group study and breakout spaces, a school store and the M. & D. D’Amour Center for Faith, Service and Justice. It will also feature a two-story wall of windows that look out on the Litchfield Hills.
The center is named for long-time supporters and trustees, Lauren and Bob Steers, and is years in the making.
“Lauren and I are committed to making this vision a reality,” Bob Steers said in a news release.
The idea for the project came from students’ input on what they wanted to see done to enhance the campus. Students unanimously suggested a space that could be a center for student activities and a place for day and boarding students to gather, as well as an area to work with their teachers and build growth their faith, according the release. The development of the Steers Center is part of several new construction initiatives—referred to collectively as the Hilltop Projects— taking place over the next few years.
School officials were thankful for the Steers’ support. Bob and Lauren Steers, along with Martin and Michele Cohen, went on to co-found Cohen & Steers, Inc. in 1986—the first and largest global investment manager dedicated to real estate securities.
“Simply put, Lauren and Bob’s passion for the values, program, and future of the school—in combination with their enduring and unparalleled commitment of time, talent and treasure—has defined this chapter of Canterbury’s story,” said Head of School Rachel Stone.
Bob Steers graduated from the school in 1971. His brothers, son and father are also alumni. Lauren Steers’ brother also graduated from the school. Canterbury is a Catholic college-preparatory, coeducational boarding and day school for students in grades 9-12.
“This school transformed my father’s life. It transformed my life,” Bob Steers said. “But Lauren’s and my commitment is based on more than that; it is based on our abiding belief in Canterbury’s mission to inspire students to become moral leaders in a complex, secular world.”

Lamont and Connecticut Construction Industries Association kick off campaign to raise opioid addiction awareness

Gov. Ned Lamont and the Connecticut Construction Industries Association kicked off a week-long campaign on Monday to raise awareness about opioid addiction among construction workers. Along with Attorney General William Tong and union representatives, Lamont spoke to workers at the state office renovation site by the Capitol.
“Protection on the job is bigger than just the vest you wear, the hardhat, and the training,” said Lamont. “[Addiction] is not a moral failure, not a because of some weakness ...This is a healthcare crisis.”
Between 2012 and 2018, the overall rate of opioid overdose deaths in Connecticut increased by over 220%. In August, the chief medical examiner’s office reported that 554 people died of opioid overdoses from January through June of this year. The total number of deaths in 2019 is expected to exceed last year’s total.
People who work in industries with high job-related injury rates run a greater risk of developing addictions, said John Hawley, president of the Associated General Contractors of Connecticut.
“Recent research from Massachusetts has shown that the opioid overdose death rate for construction workers is nearly 125 workers for 100,000 people,” said Hawley. “That is significantly higher than in agriculture, forestry, and fishing...and over five times higher than the average rate for general workers at 25 [workers per 100,000 people].”
Connecticut-specific data on construction worker overdoses is not yet available, but Hawley said the unions and government are working in real-time to address the issue.
“Deaths on the job site from opioid overdoses are quickly approaching the totals of the other [job site] death categories alone. That is totally, 100%, unacceptable,” said Kyle Zimmer of the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 478.
Over the next week, construction workers across the state will pause for presentations that share resources and encourage support for victims of the crisis as part of the “You Are Not Alone; There Is Help,” campaign.“It’s time to remove the stigmas and misconceptions of this horrible disease,” Hawley said. "The stand down is an opportunity for workers, construction companies, and their industry partners to have open conversations about addiction, overdose prevention, and industry safety policies.” Lamont and Tong called for big pharma to continue being held accountable for the opioid crisis. In September, Tong criticized Purdue Pharma for declaring bankruptcy. He called it "yet another cynical maneuver to try to shirk responsibility,” by the Oxycontin maker, owned by the Sackler family. “I want to thank you for taking such good care of all of us," said Tong to the workers. " And I want you to know that we understand it’s our obligation now to take care of you.”“Pill Man” Frank Huntley also made an appearance, bringing his life-sized skeleton constructed entirely of prescription pain-killer containers to the site. The former painter and wallpaper hanger who spent 15 years in addiction pleaded with the workers to actively monitor their physical health and avoid prescription painkillers.
“This has eaten me away. I only have a couple more years on this planet," said Huntley, 52. “We need to truly understand what these medications are doing to our bodies...It doesn’t matter who you are, what race you are from, [addiction] will never discriminate."
The Connecticut Construction Industries Association provided two hotlines for those struggling with addiction or thoughts of suicide. To reach the suicide prevention hotline, call 800-273-8255. To reach the addiction help hotline, call 800-563-4086.

 
PAUL HUGHES
HARTFORD — Gov. Ned Lamont signaled Monday that he may be near releasing his latest transportation funding plan.
Lamont indicated that the governor’s office is possibly going to wrap up consultations with General Assembly leaders this week.
“We’re meeting actively with all the legislative leaders this week, rolling out our preliminary plan, getting their final feedback on what we ought to be emphasizing, and I think we’ll have some pretty good news by the end of this week,” he told reporters.
The governor confirmed again that his transportation funding plan will include a scaled back tolling proposal.
Lamont initially proposed to establish 50 tolling locations on Interstate 84, Interstate 91, Interstate 95, and the Merritt and Wilbur Cross parkways. His revised plan is expected to propose to toll bridge projects and projects that target highway bottlenecks
The Lamont administration is also going to recommend leveraging federal grants and loans to a greater degree to bolster state borrowing and existing taxes and fees supporting the Special Transportation Fund.
Transportation funding is intertwined with the ongoing discussions on a two-year bonding package. The legislature and Lamont failed to agree to a bonding bill for the 2020 and 2021 fiscal years in the regular session.
Lamont reported those negotiations continue. The holdup remains how much to allocate for transportation versus other purposes while complying with the state bonding cap and Lamont’s self-imposed borrowing limit.
“We’re talking to leadership on both sides of the aisle extensively trying to come forward with a plan,” he said.
“That plan involves how much we’re going to borrow for transportation and how much is going to be left over to do all the important things we have got to resolve, so we can start investing in our schools, clean water and affordable housing.”
He said he believes the administration and legislative leaders are getting closer to a resolution, but declined to conjecture on when a resolution might be expected.
“I don’t know. I find in this business we all agree up to the 5-yard line, and then it gets very complicated, and I’d say we’re on the 3-yard line,” Lamont said.
The governor said he wants the legislature to act in special session on the transportation funding plan, the bonding package and settlement of a tax dispute with the hospital industry.
 

October 29, 2019

CT Construction Digest Tuesday October 29, 2019

Lamont Inches Toward Transportation and Bond Package

HARTFORD, CT — Gov. Ned Lamont canceled another Bond Commission meeting last week. That leaves just one more scheduled meeting this year and millions in municipal projects hanging in the balance. 
Lamont said his administration is talking to legislative leaders on both sides of the aisle trying to come up with a plan that includes how much the state will spend on transportation and how much it will borrow for other infrastructure projects. He wants to complete the discussion on transportation before moving to the other projects on the bond agenda.
But it’s not easy working in the off-session with a part-time legislature.
“The legislative leaders are at the table every day,” Lamont said Monday.
House Minority Leader Themis Klarides, R-Derby, said that’s not true.
Klarides said she had to ask Lamont’s chief of staff for a briefing on the 10-year, $18 billion transportation plan that he’s cautiously pitching in private.
As far as the Bond Commission agenda is concerned, there has been no information beyond what was proposed in July when the Lamont administration and legislative Democrats were $100 million apart.
Office of Policy and Management Secretary Melissa McCaw said then that the governor would agree to increase his self-imposed borrowing limit from $1 billion to $1.3 billion. But that’s contingent on lawmakers making a firm commitment to $100 million per year of that general obligation bonding being used for transportation infrastructure.
Discussions have not moved beyond that point, according to legislative sources.
As far as transportation is concerned, “Nobody reached out to me,” Klarides said. “I had to ask for a meeting.”
She said by stating he’s not going to approve any bonding without an agreement on a transportation plan, Lamont is hurting cities and towns.
“You can’t hold people hostage,” Klarides said.
Lamont disagrees with the characterization of his negotiating tactic.
“The numbers have to add up,” Lamont said.
If the state borrows $700 million for transportation, then other projects on the bond agenda will have to be scaled back to account for the transportation spending. Lamont was referring to the Republicans’ plan to pay for transportation improvements without any tolls. 
Lamont is still waiting on Republican support for his new 10-year, $18 billion proposal that includes a limited number of tolls.
“Governor Ned Lamont is committed to upgrading Connecticut’s infrastructure in a way that benefits all residents and all cities and towns,” Max Reiss, Lamont’s spokesman, said. “He is actively working toward a solution with members of the General Assembly, and once there is agreement on a path forward, the priorities of individual cities and towns will be recognized in a negotiated bond bill. Absent that agreement, there is no purpose for a meeting of the bond commission.”
Lamont’s new transportation plan leverages federal dollars for transportation projects in strategic areas with the best opportunity for improved economic development.
However, in order to leverage that federal funding, Connecticut will need to give the feds a guaranteed revenue stream. The state can’t afford to bond the entire amount, so a small “user fee” or toll will be required even with federal help. The number of tolls would be scaled back substantially from Lamont’s initial proposal of 50 gantries to somewhere between 13 and 18, according to sources familiar with the proposal.
Lamont said he’s getting the final feedback from legislative leaders this week on the transportation proposal.
“I think we’ll have some pretty good news at the end of this week,” Lamont said.
Senate Republican Leader Len Fasano, R-North Haven, said he’s been back and forth with the administration over the numbers. He said he’s getting his questions answered and giving the administration feedback about the proposal.
“Whether they took the feedback remains to be seen,” Fasano said.
So far this year, the state has borrowed $1.22 billion in general obligation bonds and there is one more meeting scheduled on Dec. 13. Bonding runs on the calendar year, not the fiscal year.
The three main infrastructure funding streams for communities — road aid for towns,  Local Capital Improvement Projects, and grants for municipal projects — have not been approved yet.
“Infrastructure funding is critical to the public safety needs and economic development concerns of municipalities and their residents,” Connecticut Conference of Municipalities Executive Director Joe DeLong said. In September, DeLong said he appreciates the governor’s efforts to address Connecticut’s transportation needs and to secure the needed adequate funding, but these grants are part of the same infrastructure picture.  “Approving these three grants proves how essential the money coming out of the Bond Commission is — it is literally the roads we drive on and the bridges we cross over,” DeLong said. “It is a dangerous waiting game being played with municipalities regarding these infrastructure funds.”

Lamont asks for ‘profile-in-courage’ from GOP on transportation
Final legislative briefings are this week

Gov. Ned Lamont told reporters Monday he is getting “final feedback” this week from legislative leaders before releasing his second try at a transportation infrastructure plan, then he challenged House Republican skeptics to reconsider their opposition to tolls or any other form of new transportation revenue.
The Lamont administration has been engaged in a give-and-take with Senate Republicans over what is expected to be a 10-year, $20 billion plan, but House Minority Leader Themis Klarides, R-Derby, has doubled down on her caucus’s opposition to any tolls and, possibly, any new revenue sources.
“It’s going to take a profile in courage,” Lamont said, when asked about the chances of getting House GOP support.
“So, his definition of a profile in courage is if somebody agrees with him?” Klarides replied.
Lamont has greatly scaled back his original plan, which called for a comprehensive system of electronic highway tolls on the Merritt Parkway and Interstates 84, 91 and 95 that he predicted could raise about $800 million annually. Without new revenue, Lamont said, the state’s special transportation fund is projected to run in the red in the next four years.
The administration’s revised plan calls for tolls only on select bridges, with a relatively modest  charge for passenger vehicles and a premium for trucks, according to officials who have been briefed.
Lamont said he expected to have “some pretty good news by the end of the week,” but administration officials have taken to heart the advice of House Democrats to avoid releasing the plan on a Friday. Supporters say the plan should be released early in the work week, with a strategy for promoting it. 
The original plan was presented to the public in an op-ed piece published on a holiday weekend in February. In recent weeks, Lamont and his staff have been briefing legislators and stakeholders outside government.
“The governor has done a good job reaching out to external validators,” said Rep. Roland J. Lemar, D-New Haven, the co-chair of the Transportation Committee. “He is taking his lumps by going to them, hearing their thoughts on why it failed last time.”
Ryan Drajewicz, the governor’s chief of staff, said the rollout this time will be deliberate.
“This will be done in close and careful collaboration with the legislative leadership and chairs” of the relevant committees, Drajewicz said, adding, “And preferably with both sides of the aisle.”
Klarides was briefed by the administration last week on a plan that outlines projects necessary to keep the state’s highway and transit system in a state of good repair, as well as making enhancements to improve commuting times by speeding rail and eliminating highway bottlenecks. It would limit tolls and rely in part on low-cost financing from the federal government.
 “We have been open-minded to the other parts, the non-tolls parts,” Klarides said.
But the administration has not made the case, at least in Klarides’ view, that new revenue is necessary to keep the special transportation fund solvent, nor does she agree that everything on Lamont’s priority list must be tackled immediately.
Financed largely by fuel taxes, fees and sales taxes, the fund pays for operational costs at the Department of Transportation, the Department of Motor Vehicles and debt service on transportation infrastructure.
In a telephone interview, Klarides initially ruled out any new transportation revenue, then reconsidered and said, “I shouldn’t say that. We have to dig very deep in this process.
Klarides suggested the governor’s plan is too ambitious.
“Let’s put a reasonable package of projects together,” Klarides said. “Let’s just get real for a change. Let’s stop living in a fantasy world, where you do everything at once.”
When Lamont proposed his original tolls plan, Republicans countered with a call to redirect about $700 million of the state’s current general-obligation bonds for transportation, an approach that Lamont says would rob other needs of necessary funding and fail to provide a stable source of revenue.
The Lamont administration is seeking low-cost federal financing that requires a dedicated source of repayment, and the governor said Klarides and others must recognize that tolls are the only way to guarantee that out-of-state drivers who traverse Connecticut highways will pay for their upkeep.
Lamont said without new revenue sources, Connecticut would have to use bonding — borrowed money — to pay the debt service on the federal loans, “putting it on the credit card of the next generation.”
“If that’s the only deal she’ll consider, I’d like to think a couple of other Republicans may stand up and challenge that and say, ‘We have a better plan, a plan where out-of-staters pay for 40 percent of it, a plan that is limited, but a plan that fixes our transportation system and fixes our special transportation fund, which goes under water in the next four of five years,’ ” Lamont said.
Senate Minority Leader Len Fasano, R-North Haven, met a week ago with the governor and other administration officials to talk about the scope of what Lamont would like to do, as well as means of financing. He posed a series of issues and concerns, and the administration has been responding.
“You have to appreciate the fact he is trying his best to sort out some of the issues,” Fasano said.
 
NEW MILFORD — Construction is underway for the new Steers Center at Canterbury School.
The new building is 22,000 square feet and will open next fall. It will have innovation and digital analytics labs, flexible classrooms, a student center, cafe, group study and breakout spaces, a school store and the M. & D. D’Amour Center for Faith, Service and Justice. It will also feature a two-story wall of windows that look out on the Litchfield Hills.
The center is named for long-time supporters and trustees, Lauren and Bob Steers, and is years in the making.
“Lauren and I are committed to making this vision a reality,” Bob Steers said in a news release.
The idea for the project came from students’ input on what they wanted to see done to enhance the campus. Students unanimously suggested a space that could be a center for student activities and a place for day and boarding students to gather, as well as an area to work with their teachers and build growth their faith, according the release. The development of the Steers Center is part of several new construction initiatives—referred to collectively as the Hilltop Projects— taking place over the next few years.
School officials were thankful for the Steers’ support. Bob and Lauren Steers, along with Martin and Michele Cohen, went on to co-found Cohen & Steers, Inc. in 1986—the first and largest global investment manager dedicated to real estate securities.
“Simply put, Lauren and Bob’s passion for the values, program, and future of the school—in combination with their enduring and unparalleled commitment of time, talent and treasure—has defined this chapter of Canterbury’s story,” said Head of School Rachel Stone.
Bob Steers graduated from the school in 1971. His brothers, son and father are also alumni. Lauren Steers’ brother also graduated from the school. Canterbury is a Catholic college-preparatory, coeducational boarding and day school for students in grades 9-12.
“This school transformed my father’s life. It transformed my life,” Bob Steers said. “But Lauren’s and my commitment is based on more than that; it is based on our abiding belief in Canterbury’s mission to inspire students to become moral leaders in a complex, secular world.”

Lamont and Connecticut Construction Industries Association kick off campaign to raise opioid addiction awareness

Gov. Ned Lamont and the Connecticut Construction Industries Association kicked off a week-long campaign on Monday to raise awareness about opioid addiction among construction workers. Along with Attorney General William Tong and union representatives, Lamont spoke to workers at the state office renovation site by the Capitol.
“Protection on the job is bigger than just the vest you wear, the hardhat, and the training,” said Lamont. “[Addiction] is not a moral failure, not a because of some weakness ...This is a healthcare crisis.”
Between 2012 and 2018, the overall rate of opioid overdose deaths in Connecticut increased by over 220%. In August, the chief medical examiner’s office reported that 554 people died of opioid overdoses from January through June of this year. The total number of deaths in 2019 is expected to exceed last year’s total.
People who work in industries with high job-related injury rates run a greater risk of developing addictions, said John Hawley, president of the Associated General Contractors of Connecticut.
“Recent research from Massachusetts has shown that the opioid overdose death rate for construction workers is nearly 125 workers for 100,000 people,” said Hawley. “That is significantly higher than in agriculture, forestry, and fishing...and over five times higher than the average rate for general workers at 25 [workers per 100,000 people].”
Connecticut-specific data on construction worker overdoses is not yet available, but Hawley said the unions and government are working in real-time to address the issue.
“Deaths on the job site from opioid overdoses are quickly approaching the totals of the other [job site] death categories alone. That is totally, 100%, unacceptable,” said Kyle Zimmer of the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 478.
Over the next week, construction workers across the state will pause for presentations that share resources and encourage support for victims of the crisis as part of the “You Are Not Alone; There Is Help,” campaign.“It’s time to remove the stigmas and misconceptions of this horrible disease,” Hawley said. "The stand down is an opportunity for workers, construction companies, and their industry partners to have open conversations about addiction, overdose prevention, and industry safety policies.” Lamont and Tong called for big pharma to continue being held accountable for the opioid crisis. In September, Tong criticized Purdue Pharma for declaring bankruptcy. He called it "yet another cynical maneuver to try to shirk responsibility,” by the Oxycontin maker, owned by the Sackler family. “I want to thank you for taking such good care of all of us," said Tong to the workers. " And I want you to know that we understand it’s our obligation now to take care of you.”“Pill Man” Frank Huntley also made an appearance, bringing his life-sized skeleton constructed entirely of prescription pain-killer containers to the site. The former painter and wallpaper hanger who spent 15 years in addiction pleaded with the workers to actively monitor their physical health and avoid prescription painkillers.
“This has eaten me away. I only have a couple more years on this planet," said Huntley, 52. “We need to truly understand what these medications are doing to our bodies...It doesn’t matter who you are, what race you are from, [addiction] will never discriminate."
The Connecticut Construction Industries Association provided two hotlines for those struggling with addiction or thoughts of suicide. To reach the suicide prevention hotline, call 800-273-8255. To reach the addiction help hotline, call 800-563-4086.
 
PAUL HUGHES
HARTFORD — Gov. Ned Lamont signaled Monday that he may be near releasing his latest transportation funding plan.
Lamont indicated that the governor’s office is possibly going to wrap up consultations with General Assembly leaders this week.
“We’re meeting actively with all the legislative leaders this week, rolling out our preliminary plan, getting their final feedback on what we ought to be emphasizing, and I think we’ll have some pretty good news by the end of this week,” he told reporters.
The governor confirmed again that his transportation funding plan will include a scaled back tolling proposal.
Lamont initially proposed to establish 50 tolling locations on Interstate 84, Interstate 91, Interstate 95, and the Merritt and Wilbur Cross parkways. His revised plan is expected to propose to toll bridge projects and projects that target highway bottlenecks
The Lamont administration is also going to recommend leveraging federal grants and loans to a greater degree to bolster state borrowing and existing taxes and fees supporting the Special Transportation Fund.
Transportation funding is intertwined with the ongoing discussions on a two-year bonding package. The legislature and Lamont failed to agree to a bonding bill for the 2020 and 2021 fiscal years in the regular session.
Lamont reported those negotiations continue. The holdup remains how much to allocate for transportation versus other purposes while complying with the state bonding cap and Lamont’s self-imposed borrowing limit.
“We’re talking to leadership on both sides of the aisle extensively trying to come forward with a plan,” he said.
“That plan involves how much we’re going to borrow for transportation and how much is going to be left over to do all the important things we have got to resolve, so we can start investing in our schools, clean water and affordable housing.”
He said he believes the administration and legislative leaders are getting closer to a resolution, but declined to conjecture on when a resolution might be expected.
“I don’t know. I find in this business we all agree up to the 5-yard line, and then it gets very complicated, and I’d say we’re on the 3-yard line,” Lamont said.
The governor said he wants the legislature to act in special session on the transportation funding plan, the bonding package and settlement of a tax dispute with the hospital industry.
 

October 28, 2019

CT Construction Digest Monday October 28, 2019

Climate change v. Killingly gas power plant. And the winner is …

When the plan to build a natural gas power plant in Killingly first came up in 2016, the objections from folks in this northeast corner town of about 17,000 were pretty basic – they already had one, didn’t want another about a mile away, and didn’t want its emissions.
“Not another power plant,” was the rallying cry. Three years later, this remains the name of the local opposition group — or NAPP for short.
But since then, the furor over the proposed Killingly Energy Center (KEC) has expanded into a statewide environmental cause célèbre and is now something of a poster child for how not to tackle climate change. Those critical of the plan point out that a fossil fuel-run power plant that still emits greenhouse gases, even if it produces fewer of them than oil or coal plants, will not allow the state to meet a 2040 target of 100% zero carbon for the elector sector suggested by Gov. Ned Lamont last month.
With this as their argument, environmental advocates have ramped up their opposition to KEC. For the last several months, members of the Sierra Club and other groups have protested every Friday outside the governor’s residence, while NAPP has held protests on Saturdays in Killingly. Advocates have also blasted the governor’s office and Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Commissioner Katie Dykes with emails and calls opposing the plant.
“This one plant is shining a light on a bigger problem we have in Connecticut,” said Samantha Dynowski, state director of the Sierra Club. “We have clean energy goals and greenhouse gas reduction goals, but they’re only good if we use them for decision-making.”
Lately the governor is saying what they’re saying.
“I can say Connecticut has a zero-carbon electric grid by 2040. I’d like to see Rhode Island and Massachusetts follow our lead there. And if we’re all on that same page, we don’t need a Killingly plant. We’ll see how that sorts out,” Lamont said after a meeting with governors of those two states Thursday. “I’ve got to think about: Is this important for Connecticut’s energy future? Right now, I’m sort of doubtful.”
His comments echoed a widely-circulated video from a few days prior in which Lamont said he was going to take “a good hard look at it.”
On Friday there was a meeting that included representatives of the governor’s office, Dykes and the plant’s developers – NTE Energy, based in Florida. Sources say state officials are taking a hard look at the project and discussing what the options are.
Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan, D-Bethel, co-vice chair of the Energy and Technology Committee and leader of the legislative Clean Energy Caucus, said he’s spoken with the governor’s office about next steps. He also signed a letter from more than two-dozen legislators urging Lamont to oppose the Killingly plant.We don’t want a fossil fuel future for Connecticut,” he said. “The governor is committed to clean energy. We want to make sure we stay on that path. We don’t need the power and even if we did, we wouldn’t do this.”
While the recent activity indicates KEC opponents may be closer to convincing state officials than they realize, actually stopping the plant is not so easy. The governor can’t just say, “I don’t want it.” The regulatory approval process is underway. And the grid operator, ISO-New England, has already obligated itself to use the power.
A little history will help explain the difficulties.
What happened and when
The plant was first proposed in 2016 for 550 megawatts. By comparison, both Millstone units together are about 2100 megawatts. The state’s siting council rejected the proposal twice. It was resubmitted early this year for 650 megawatts.
The siting council approved the new submission in early June, despite arguments that the power was not needed for grid reliability, and DEEP filed a letter of support, which opponents criticized for not addressing climate change.
Dykes, however, has repeatedly acknowledged to the CT Mirror that climate change pressures have increased rapidly since she served as energy chief in 2011, when the state began a push for greater use of natural gas toward the beginning of the Malloy administration.
 
 
“We need to be transitioning away from more fossil fuel to zero carbon,” she reiterated after last Friday’s meeting. But she laid a lot of the problem at ISO’s doorstep.
Dykes pointed out that at the last annual future power auction in February – known as the forward capacity auction – to choose power generators beginning in 2022, the Killingly plant was among the generators it chose, which means the whole region is stuck with it.
The siting council rejected in July a request for reconsideration of its approval for Killingly. Just days before the governor’s executive order paving the way to 100% carbon-free power, NAPP filed suit over the siting council decision.
That case, which has not yet been heard, focuses narrowly on one issue. When the siting council approved the plant, the pipeline needed to connect it to a natural gas supply was not included. The lawyer for NAPP said, based on previous federal rulings, it should have been.
The matter of the pipeline, which would go through areas of protected land and under the Quinebaug River, along with a number of permits that still require approval, could turn out to be good news for plant opponents since any one of the needed approvals, theoretically, has the potential to derail the project.
 
 
Lois Latraverse, a member of NAPP, still worries. “Our feeling is if you start that construction and the pipeline is not approved, you could still destroy acres and acres of carbon-eating forestland,” she said.
Adding to the frustration of plant opponents was a timing problem that emanated from confusion over rules that made it difficult for the many planned offshore wind resources, which are zero carbon, to compete in last February’s auction.
The state of natural gas in New England
All of this begs the question of whether, in the face of climate change, new natural gas plants should be built, period.
“Unequivocally no,” said Martha Klein of Sierra Club, who organized much of the Killingly protests and cites economic reasons, such as the declining costs of solar and offshore wind and the potential for battery storage. “All of these other states are doing renewable energy projects. Who says we need another fossil fuel power plant? We don’t need it.”
But Dan Dolan, president of the New England Power Generators Association, said natural gas is still needed even with the dramatic increases in renewable deployment.
“It becomes a funny situation,” he said. “There is going to be a need from a reliability basis for things like natural gas.”
Such plants can be powered up as needed at times, he said, such as when the wind isn’t blowing, the sun isn’t shining, or a key generator goes offline.
“We expect natural gas plants to operate less, but be more valuable,” Dolan said. “I don’t think they’re incompatible in the transition and march towards decarbonization.”
 
 
Gas still accounts for about half of New England’s available power generation and nuclear accounts for just under one-third. Renewables – not including hydro –  while only about one-tenth currently? YES CURRENTLY, account for almost all of the proposed new generation: 61% is wind, 15% is solar and 12% is battery storage, according to ISO-NE.
Natural gas accounts for 12%. According to ISO-NE, since the start of the state’s push for more natural gas in 2011, eight natural gas units larger than 100 megawatts have come online in New England. Five are in Connecticut, including the Bridgeport Harbor expansion, the Kleen Energy project in Middletown and the Towantic Energy Center in Oxford, along with a number of smaller plants – totaling more than 2,500 megawatts.
ISO reports that there are two natural gas projects greater than 100 MW under development in New England — one in Rhode Island, and Killingly.
Killingly’s developer, NTE, is a fairly new company with two operating plants, one under construction and four projects (including Killingly) in development.
Email comments from Tim Eves, NTE’s president, did not respond to the question of what the company would do in the face of an attempt by Connecticut to scuttle the plant. Eves’ statement reiterated the plant’s ability “to support the variability of renewable energy sources: KEC will run when the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing and will not run when they are.”
Killingly Town Manager Mary Calorio, said “the town has no comment,” when asked what it would do if the plant is not built.
The town stands to make a large amount of money from the plant. In addition to hundreds of temporary jobs, it would reap more than $120 million over 20 years in tax stabilization and Community Environmental Benefit Agreement payments.
Even so, Rep. Pat Boyd, D-Pomfret, who does not represent Killingly but can see the plant site from his home, said not one of the many constituents that has contacted him is in favor of the plant.
“It is a step in the wrong direction,” he said, noting nearby solar developments. “We’ve set a policy for the state. Putting in a plant like this is completely opposite to that vision.”

 
Stamford man says his street has not been fixed for half a century
Angela Carella
STAMFORD — It looks like Madison Place last was paved in 1965.
Alan Jackson, who lived there then and lives there now, said it happened the year before he graduated what at the time was Rippowam High School.
The city doesn’t refute Jackson’s claim. A spokesman for Mayor David Martin said it’s unlikely road paving records have ever been kept.
Jackson said he’s sure of the date.
“The father of one of my best friends worked for the city then, and they were going to pave Hall Place,” which runs parallel to Madison Place between Wilson Street and Fairfield Avenue. “He said, ‘Hall Place was done a few years ago; let’s do Madison.’ They did, and he almost got fired for it,” Jackson said.
Lyndon B. Johnson was president, Rippowam had recently opened as the city’s second high school, and Jackson was a teenager.
“It was 1965,” said Jackson, now in his early 70s. “Since then they’ve been patching it.”
The ride down the residential West Side street on a weekday morning was bumpy. Irregularly shaped patches are everywhere. There are patches on top of patches, with sunken spots in between.
Long patches line the edges of the street on both sides, and there are plenty of cracks — some stretch lengthwise down the street; others form little squares that splay crosswise. There are holes.
Hopes dashed
“The city redid the sidewalks about two years ago. I think they were the original sidewalks from the 1940s,” Jackson said. “I thought it was a good sign that they would do the street. But they didn’t.”
He put in requests on the city’s online citizens’ service platform, FixIt Stamford, and received an email.
“They sent me the link to the paving list, which shows Madison Place is No. 74. I wrote back that I think it should be higher, since it wasn’t done since 1965,” Jackson said. “They didn’t seem concerned.''
On the list, last updated Sept. 27, Madison Place is color-coded as “pending,” which means “no actions being taken at this time.”
The list includes 132 streets slated for work. Stamford has more than 1,200 streets.
A goal unreached
Residents and city representatives have long complained about poor road conditions. Martin has acknowledged the problem, saying the city needs to spend at least $6 million a year on repairs but, before he began his first term in 2013, only half that amount was being spent. Martin allocated $5 million for paving his first year in office but dropped it to about half that amount for the next couple of years because the city had to fund the new school on Strawberry Hill Avenue and a new police headquarters on Bedford Street.
Martin got the paving budget to $6.5 million in 2017, the year he was reelected, but it fell to $4.8 million last year after mold was discovered in multiple school buildings, requiring costly repairs.
For the fiscal year that started July 1, Martin set aside $4 million, but he has a request before the Board of Representatives for an additional $1.6 million. If representatives approve his request when they meet Nov. 6, it will bring total spending on roads this year to $5.6 million, just shy of Martin’s annual goal.
Mystery list
Jackson said he wonders how the list works.
“If you drive around the West Side, you’ll see a lot of streets in bad shape,” he said. “There could be others that haven’t been paved since the 1960s.”
Last month city representatives invited public works officials to explain how crews tackle the paving list. They learned that multiple factors affect decisions about which streets to fix.
Besides the budget, factors include condition of storm drains, which must be repaired before roads are repaved; whether utility or construction companies plan to dig up a street; digs by a state agency that monitors aging natural-gas lines; and the weather.
City Rep. Jeff Stella represents District 9, which includes parts of the West Side. It would not be surprising to learn that streets have gone unpaved for decades, Stella said.
“Roads on the West Side have been in bad condition for years. I’ve complained about it myself,” Stella said. “But I know they are starting to pave because I’ve seen crews on West Avenue, and they are hitting some of the side streets.”
That follows what Operations Director Mark McGrath told representatives last month — crews working on a main artery will resurface a nearby side street if they see it’s crumbling. It’s to work as efficiently as possible “wherever we drop anchor,” McGrath told them.
Getting irked
Martin’s spokesman, Arthur Augustyn, said West Side streets are not different from those in other parts of the city.
“All neighborhoods in Stamford are in need of road repair,” Augustyn said, citing the paving list, which he said shows “that the West Side has had many paving projects in the past five years.”
According to the list, crews have paved Stillwater Avenue and Smith Street, filled cracks on West Avenue, and are fixing drainage problems on Richmond Hill Avenue.
The list is based on a 2016 study by a company, Infrastructure Management Services, that Martin hired for $144,000 to assess the condition of every road in the city. Martin did not form the paving list based juston condition, however. He factored in traffic volume.
“The mayor created a formula weighing road condition with volume of use and that’s what created the priority list,” Augustyn said. “The mayor says this frequently and it’s worth repeating: Stamford’s roads are the result of underfunding road maintenance for over 10 years. We’ve made a lot of progress, but it may take 10 years to bring all our roads to better conditions A 10-year wait is one thing; 54 years is something entirely different, said Jackson, who with his sister owns the house on Madison Place purchased by their parents in 1958.
“I started getting really aggravated about five years ago,”  he said.

Construction sites to "stand down" to address opioid abuse
AP
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — Work at dozens of constructions sites across Connecticut will be suspended in the coming days to draw attention to the problem of opioid abuse in the construction industry.
Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont and Attorney General William Tong are scheduled to appear Monday morning with members of the Connecticut Construction Industry Association and construction union officials outside the State Office Building in Hartford, where a massive renovation project is under way. It will be one of dozens of similar "stand downs" planned across the state at construction sites, beginning Monday and running through Friday.
The general theme of the campaign is called "You Are Not Alone: There Is Help." The events are designed to create awareness, provide resources and reduce the stigma of opioid use among construction workers.

East Lyme officials review scaled-back police building plans
Mary Biekert
East Lyme — Public Safety Building Vision Committee members on Thursday reviewed newly revised concept plans for the town’s proposed policing facility after objections were raised to a higher-than-expected $5.8 million renovation estimate presented to the committee late last month.
Compared to the original plan, which took up 22,537 square feet spread across two floors in the building, the new plan features renovations on just the first floor of the building, taking up 16,938 square feet, which committee members are hoping will bring the price down to within the town’s $1.7 million budget for the project.
Vision Committee Chairman Paul Dagle, who is also a selectman, said that contracted building architects Silver/Petrucelli + Associates have not yet provided new cost estimates, but committee members would receive them by Monday to discuss at another meeting planned for Tuesday night.
A previous cost breakdown presented by architects showed that renovations would cost about $248 per square foot. Dagle said he was not sure yet whether the price per square foot would decrease, but that, “We’re expecting the price to come down closer to the budget.”
“I just know that, with the decrease in the total square footage and some effect of not having to worry about means of egress because we aren’t on the second floor at all, the price is coming down,” Dagle said.
Committee members added that the latest plans could save hundreds of thousands of dollars by not replacing an HVAC system and skipping over repaving the parking lot. A downgraded generator also will save at least $100,000, member Bill Cornelius said.
Dagle said more savings may be found when the town has a better understanding of which Americans with Disabilities Act and other building requirements must be followed.
Building official Steve Way had previously told The Day the town may be able to save money by structurally upgrading only certain parts of the building, such as its Emergency Operations Center.
Way also had told The Day that the building may not need to be fully retrofitted with sprinklers, depending on which modifications can be obtained from the state. Should holding cells be built, that part of the building would need to be retrofitted with sprinklers, he said.
The town still needs to obtain modifications to bypass certain building requirements from the state's building official.
Voters in a February referendum approved spending up to $5 million to purchase and renovate the former 30,000-square-foot Honeywell office building at 277 West Main St. into a consolidated space that would house a new police facility, as well as the town’s dispatch center, fire marshal’s office and emergency operations center.
Having closed on the building in May for about $2.77 million, the town is now left with approximately $1.7 million for repurposing the structure as a public safety facility, while the remaining $500,000 will be used to install communications wiring and dispatch equipment in the building.
But after Silver/Petrucelli + Associates said renovations could cost as much as $5.8 million at the Sept. 26 Public Safety Building Vision Committee meeting — $3.6 million more than provided by the approved bond issue — many residents, as well as some town officials, have since expressed worry that the project simply cannot come in on budget.
Principal architect William Silver of Silver/Petrucelli + Associates has since appeared before the Board of Selectmen to offer an explanation for the higher-than-expected renovation estimates. Silver said earlier this month that a “needs assessment” for the building, as well as the first “conceptual design,” presented to the Vision Committee on Sept. 26, was just the first phase of a multiple-step process between architects and the committee — a "planning tool," he said, to begin the process and to “show the big picture” of the project, “to give you a sense of what the total responsibilities in the long run are going to be involved.”
According to comments submitted to the vision committee by police Chief Mike Finkelstein, who was not present at Thursday’s meeting, the new plan is "workable."
“He understands and we all understand that we are trying to minimize the amount of work in this building and maximize it as an office building,” Dagle said.
Most committee members at Thursday's meeting also expressed content with the newly outlined plans and said it made sense to keep the plans to just the first floor, saving the second floor for expansion of other town departments in the future.
Member Lisa Picarazzi, who is also vice chairwoman of the finance board, raised concerns with the building’s roof, asking that the committee receive an accurate lifespan for it. According to initial price estimates, a new roof would cost more than $370,000. Picarazzi also said she wanted to ensure that the size of the Information Technology room provides adequate space for its systems, saying that Stonington police had told her, while she was touring their building, that their IT room is too small and to learn from their mistake.
Dagle said he would add her concerns to the list of questions to ask architects.
Holding cells also were designed into the scheme presented Thursday. Dagle said that was to help price out how much the cells would cost, which will be further determined when the committee goes out to bid on contracted renovations for the building. Once the committee has the final price of the holding cells, Dagle said it will then make a recommendation to the Board of Selectmen on whether the cells should be built as part of the building now or to wait until later.
The Board of Finance voted during a Jan. 23 special meeting to decrease the amount the town is allowed to bond out for the project, unanimously approving $5 million — $2.77 million to purchase the building and $2.23 million for renovations. That was below the initial nearly $6 million request based on estimates First Selectman Mark Nickerson and the task force obtained from experts.
Cutting $1 million from the original request, the board acknowledged, would mean potentially putting off installing proposed holding cells. In Silver/Petrucelli + Associates’ original presentation, holding cells were estimated to cost just over $1 million.
Dagle said that should the holding cells be built, the committee also would need to account for how much it would cost to hook up the building to the town’s water system, which would be needed for the sprinkler system required in the holding cell area.
Dagle said the town is planning to connect the police building property to a water line that soon will be brought down through a proposed affordable-housing development — known as Rocky Neck Village — currently being planned just north of the police building.
Dagle said those costs are not currently part of the $5 million budget.
Reviewing the vision committee’s charter, Dagle said, “Our goal is to get those four organizations in this building and make sure it's functional so that they can go do their job and be in a much better environment than the one they’re in today.”
“And if for some reason, we think we are taking a shortcut here, cramming all this here into the square footage, or cramming it in to meet the cost, it’s our responsibility to identify that,” Dagle said. “We are going to have to continue to evaluate this. A lot of things will evolve. This is our second or third step to get a concept to meet our needs and budget.”

N. Britain’s Hospital for Special Care to break ground on $13M expansion
Joe Cooper
he Hospital for Special Care (HFSC) in New Britain says it will break ground Tuesday on a $13 million expansion of a hospitalization program and an education and day center.
The project is being supported by $10 million in funding approved by the state Bond Commission and $2.3 million in community contributions. HFSC is still seeking another $700,000 in funds to complete its fundraiser.
The American Savings Foundation made the first investment in the project through a $150,000 grant. A spokesman for HFSC said the grant played a significant role in spurring other public and private contributions.
Construction is expected to be completed by fall 2020.
The partial hospital program and education and day center will complement current outpatient and inpatient services at HFSC’s autism center, hospital officials say..
The expanded facility is being designed by architecture firm Kaestle Boos Associates Inc. and construction is being managed by Downes Construction Co., both based in New Britain.

Windsor Locks PZC greenlights 116-room hotel
Joe Cooper
Planning officials in Windsor Locks have blessed a developer’s plan to build a 116-room Tru by Hilton brand hotel on Ella Grasso Turnpike.
The town’s Planning and Zoning Commission last week unanimously approved a special use permit and site plan application for New Hampshire-based Archgrove Hospitality Inc. to build the 55,000-square-foot hotel at 229 Ella Grasso Turnpike next to the Springhill Suites by Marriott Hartford hotel.
The 6-acre property, which sits across from the entrance of Bradley International Airport, is owned by Frank E. Bauchiero Jr. of 225 Turnpike Associates LLC.
It’s not yet clear how much the hotel project will cost or when construction will begin. Archgrove and Bauchiero could not immediately be reached for comment Friday, and they have not yet applied for building permits with the town.
According to plans, the rooms will span over 13,000 square feet and the building will feature an indoor pool, fitness room, lounge with a gaming room, and an area for continental breakfast. It will also include two offices and a break room for employees. Plans do not currently include a bar.
The hotel will have 123 parking spaces split across two separate parking areas and will likely offer guests a shuttle service to the airport.
Tru by Hilton operates 129 hotels in the U.S.
The Windsor Locks project is one of several recent hotel proposals in Greater Hartford’s growing hospitality industry.