May 31, 2022

CT Construction Digest Tuesday May 31, 2022

Stamford’s housing authority plan for Oak Park: Raze 27 buildings, fix flooding problems, rebuild 

VerĂ³nica Del Valle

STAMFORD — In the wake of World War II, the Oak Park housing complex was a promise: 108-units, all for “moderate-income” veterans.

“And it is now in need of complete redevelopment,” land use consultant Rick Redniss told the Zoning Board.

On behalf of the Charter Oak Communities, Stamford’s housing authority, Redniss has put before the Board a new plan for the property. Across three phases, the housing authority will tear down Oak Park and replace it with updated and larger units. The buildings will include 16 one-bedroom, 114 two-bedroom and 36 three-bedroom apartments.

For the Oak Park redesign to move forward as currently proposed, the Zoning Board must approve changes to the parking requirements for affordable housing projects. The board will again discuss Oak Park at its June 6 meeting.

The 27 buildings that make up Oak Park were all built in 1948 as “temporary housing for World War II veterans,” according to Charter Oak CEO Vin Tufo.

Over the years, Tufo has repeatedly said that the complex was just a temporary solution when first built: “It was really never built to last this long,” he told The Stamford Advocate. Because of the project’s “temporary” nature, it has required extensive investment from Charter Oak, he said.

The project also receives no operating subsidy from the government, according to documents submitted to the city. Rental payments are the only funding that covers property expenses.

“While rents do cover basic operating expenses, they do not address structural and building system issues that affect 75-year-old wood frame buildings,” Redniss and Mead wrote in a project summary.

But after a certain point, even the temporary fixes have fallen short. Charter Oak Communities eyed making substantial updates to Oak Park in 2020 when it asked for just under $300,000 in city dollars to fund roof and basement repairs on the property. That request failed; now, Charter Oak wants to solve some of the problems it addressed through a more comprehensive redesign.

The plan is to tear down the current facility and during the rebuild, improve the drainage since Oak Park has long suffered from serious flooding problems.

Though Redniss explained that most of the flooding issues extend far past what Charter Oak can fix through redevelopment, the new Oak Park will have permeable pavements and underground infiltration systems to help hold stormwater runoff.

During the renovation process, Charter Oak says that residents will be able to remain in the complex. Those who live in the apartments under construction will be moved into other vacant units, Redniss told the Zoning Board. Each project phase includes several dozen apartments.

Charter Oak also plans to tweak the income levels of residents it targets, according to Jonathan Gottlieb, who heads the housing authority’s development arm.

Charter Oak currently restricts the complex to families making less than 80 percent of the Stamford’s area median income. Once the renovations are completed, the plan is to change the income restrictions to target people making between 25 and 60 percent of the area median income.

Because the local median income jumped significantly in 2022, Charter Oak “has not identified anybody (currently living there) whose income would be over the most current” income thresholds.


Norwalk to replace aging West Cedar Street bridge with wider two-lane overpass

Richard Chumney

NORWALK — Engineers plan to replace the 112-year-old bridge on West Cedar Street that crosses the Five Mile River with a wider overpass that can accommodate two full lanes of traffic and a sidewalk.

The larger concrete bridge will be designed to match the historic but slowly deteriorating stone structure that stands near Norwalk Community College’s main campus, according to Vanessa Valadares, a city engineer.

“We would like to keep the same look that we have on the bridge that is there now,” Valadares said during a meeting with the Norwalk Conservation Commission last week. “We think it's very important for the neighborhood.”

In 2019, the city hired Alfred Benesch and Company, a Glastonbury engineering firm, to design a new bridge after state inspectors raised concerns about the existing structure’s condition. The narrow bridge was built in 1910 and an estimated 4,500 vehicles pass over it every day.

“A lot of people currently utilize the bridge as a one-lane alternating roadway,” said Ricky Mears, an Alfred Benesch project manager.

Mears said the firm is proposing to replace the aging structure with a bridge that is 28 feet wide, a 10-foot increase over the existing bridge. The wider bridge will be able to accommodate two 11-foot lanes, a pair of 3-foot shoulders and a 5-foot sidewalk.

Engineers believe the wider and sturdier bridge will allow pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles to travel over the river more efficiently and in a safer manner.

In an effort to resemble the appearance of the yet-to-be demolished bridge, Mears said the proposed bridge will employ a “precast concrete arch” system with stone masonry walls.

“A stone veneer will be utilized on the face of the proposed arch, parapets and wingwalls to replicate the aesthetics of the existing bridge,” engineers wrote in an application submitted to the city.

The replacement bridge is expected to cost $3.8 million. Valadares said the project is being paid for with a combination of local, state and federal funds.

In addition to handling more traffic, Mears said the new bridge will also be better positioned to withstand flooding since it will be wider and will stand slightly taller than the existing overpass, which sits in a floodplain.

Mears said engineers plan to submit a finalized bridge design by early July. Demolition of the old bridge and the construction of the new structure is not expected to begin until the spring of 2024.

Since the bridge is surrounded by a series of wetlands, the construction plans must first be approved by the conservation commission before work can begin. The commission voted to hold a public hearing for the project on June 14.

Commission members did not voice any concerns about the bridge design following the presentation. Chairperson John Moeling praised the engineer’s proposal for “salvaging the look” of the old bridge.

“Despite the fact that it jams everybody up traffic-wise, it's a pretty cool looking bridge, especially in context with the surrounding river and wetlands,” Moeling said.


Energy secretary: US offshore wind jobs should be union jobs

JENNIFER McDERMOTT, Associated Press

NEW LONDON, Conn. (AP) — The growing offshore wind industry is often touted as a boon for job creation, but who will do the work?

The U.S. energy secretary and Danish wind developer Orsted say they want American union workers to build offshore wind farms to dot the U.S. coastlines — the building trades workers who could otherwise be left out of a transition to renewable resources.

A majority of onshore wind and solar farms have been built either with non-union workers or without collective bargaining agreements, except for in California where unions are more involved in the industry, according to North America’s Building Trades Unions. Orsted signed a project labor agreement this month with the national union representing 3 million people in the building trades to construct the company’s U.S. offshore wind farms with an American union workforce.

“Our recent experience in the last two decades with onshore wind and solar has been that the majority of those projects are not built with us,” NABTU Secretary-Treasurer Brent Booker said this week. “So this is groundbreaking in setting the standard for an emerging industry here.”

The Biden administration wants to deploy 30 gigawatts of offshore wind energy by 2030, generating enough electricity to power more than 10 million homes. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm visited the New London State Pier facility last week to see how Orsted, energy provider Eversource and the state of Connecticut are transforming it into a hub for the offshore wind industry.

At a press conference after, the Democratic governor and Democratic congressmen spoke about creating American jobs — messaging that will surely play into their reelection campaigns.

Gov. Ned Lamont said there are “hundreds of good paying jobs right here” and “we're just getting started.”

U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal thanked the unions, saying “this is the future of energy in the United States of America right here.” U.S. Rep. Joe Courtney said they're maximizing every opportunity for the state to grow in a sustainable way.

U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy, the only one not up for reelection, echoed the same message, saying offshore wind is the “holy grail of public policy” because it creates jobs, helps the local economy, makes the country more secure and helps save the planet.

Flanked by building trades members, Granholm said the administration is committed to creating “union jobs in America in this clean energy economy.” She said she wants predominantly American union workers to build U.S. offshore wind farms and would like to see project labor agreements in all aspects of the energy transition, drawing cheers from workers at the pier.

“That’s what we’d like, all union,” she told The Associated Press.

Allison Ziogas, Orsted's U.S. labor relations manager, said one of the reasons they sought the agreement with NABTU was to assure workers, particularly in the fossil fuel industry, that they can have good-paying jobs in offshore wind.

“There is not the same level or quality of jobs with the solar industry, so it’s kind of created a false narrative that you can have good jobs or a healthy climate but not both,” she said. “And we really recognized that if we didn't have everyone on board, we knew how things would wind up. It would wind up in gridlock.”

Orsted currently has six projects in five states. The “National Offshore Wind Agreement” covers contractors working on those projects and future ones, with no termination date on the project labor agreement. It sets the terms and conditions for union workers to build offshore wind farms, with targets to ensure a diverse workforce. It contains provisions for training to ensure they can construct the complex infrastructure.

Ziogas said nearly all of the total work hours on each project will be done with union labor, with a team from abroad with experience installing turbines supporting the offshore work. She said Orsted is committed to “creating an American industry,” and hopes the agreement sets the bar for it.

Keith Brothers, head of the building trades in Connecticut, said he briefly spoke with Granholm at the pier about the project labor agreement. Brothers said it's about creating opportunities, not only for a longtime tradesman but also for a new apprentice looking for a career in the emerging U.S. offshore wind industry.

“That’s what’s exciting about it, it’s new. We really don’t know what it’s going to bring or how many jobs. But we know it’s a lot,” he said. “We know it’s new and there’s a lot coming.”

The first U.S. offshore wind farm began operating off Block Island, Rhode Island, in late 2016. Orsted acquired the developer and now operates that five-turbine wind farm. The first commercial-scale project is off the coast of Massachusetts.

The Biden administration has also approved the construction and operations for South Fork Wind, a joint venture between Orsted and Eversource. Its transmission system will connect to the electric grid on Long Island, New York, making it the state’s first offshore wind farm and jumpstarting the offshore wind industry there. The onshore construction started in February.


Stratford planning for Sikorsky Aircraft deal’s impact on local economy

Mike Mavredakis

STRATFORD — The town is preparing for possible job growth at the Sikorsky Aircraft plant following a state deal to keep them in Stratford until 2042.

Stratford’s main areas of focus are on the local housing market, supporting local business and infrastructure, according to Economic Development Director Mary Dean.

Gov. Ned Lamont on Monday signed a bill promising up to $75 million in tax incentives over eight years for Lockheed Martin subsidiary Sikorsky Aircraft, should the company win the government contracts to be the U.S. Army’s next supplier of Black Hawk or armed scout helicopters.

The deal will keep 8,000 jobs in Connecticut at minimum, Lamont said Monday. The deal affects more than 30,000 jobs, directly and indirectly, and 242 suppliers throughout Connecticut, according to state officials. Of those suppliers, 18 are located in Stratford.

Dean said that they plan to work with any local businesses or subcontractors who are seeing an uptick in business.

“We’ll work hard for the businesses to make sure that they have the capacity and the room they need,” Dean said.

Some measures of preparation have already been undertaken, Dean said. For example, the town instituted a job board on the Economic and Community Development Department website for local businesses to advertise their openings.

Dean mentioned the construction work done to improve the entrance and egress on Route 110, where Sikorsky’s plant is located, that was funded by a state urban action grant.

“Sikorsky is prepared in terms of getting their employees in and out and not causing a lot of traffic,” Dean said.

To help address the housing shortage in the area, Dean pointed to a couple of housing projects in the works at the Center School property and at the old Christ Church property, called the Village Inn. She said there are also a pair of smaller mixed-use properties on Ferry Boulevard.

“Adding these new apartments, I think, will make a difference,” Dean said.

She said as Stratford’s seniors age — 19.9 percent of the town is 65 years or older, according to Census data — they may want to move into the new apartments being created, which could open up opportunities in its single-family housing market.

Mayor Laura Hoydick said the town has been in a similar position before, since Sikorsky already has a contract for the CH-53K helicopters. She said the town will likely use the “same playbook” but with “different components.”

Lamont said at a press conference Monday that he is not worried the potential added jobs would strain local markets. He said that the state is “ready” and is preparing for the deal, should Sikorsky win the contracts.

The deal is subject to Sikorsky winning either one or two of the government contracts it is currently in the running for — a replacement for the Black Hawk helicopter and an armed scout helicopter.

Should Sikorsky win both from the Pentagon, it would be eligible to receive the full $75 million, and if it wins one the deal decreases to $50 million, Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development Commissioner David Lehman said previously.

“Our collaboration with the State of Connecticut on this project will sustain and help bring more high-tech, high-paying jobs to the state, while bolstering Connecticut’s leadership in aerospace production for decades to come,” Paul Lemmo, president of Sikorsky, said in a statement to Hearst Connecticut Media.

State Sen. Kevin Kelly, R-Stratford, called the deal a “shot in the arm” for the Connecticut economy, highlighting the state’s ranks among the lowest in job and income growth nationwide.

He said he hopes it will “help improve the quality of our housing” and “hopefully it will create more affordable housing.”

“It’s good for the area. I think it’s good for getting people employed,” Kelly said.

Kelly said by creating more jobs, it will improve the town’s grand list.

“Hopefully it will grow our grand list, which will allow us to put more into education and improve an already good educational system into a better one,” Kelly said.

Fred Carstensen, a University of Connecticut Economics and Finance professor, said he sees this deal as helping to maintain the current workforce, rather than increase it. He said that the value of manufacturing has drastically increased while employment has fallen over the last 20 years.

“In many cases you’re trying to preserve the number of jobs, because every worker is becoming more productive,” Carstensen said. “So, even though you’re expanding output, you’re not expanding jobs, so you’re trying to preserve the jobs.”

He said since these are high-paying jobs, it will trickle down into the local economy “in an extraordinarily important way.”


Opposition grows to Old Mystic energy storage facility

Joe Wojtas 

Stonington — A group of neighbors, the Aquarion Water Co. and some town officials are criticizing a proposal by a Virginia firm to construct an energy storage facility off rural Prentice Williams Road in Old Mystic. 

They say it endangers the aquifer where it is located and the nearby Aquarion Water Co. reservoir, does not conform to the rural zoning in the area, and poses both a fire and safety hazard for neighbors. The state Siting Council and not the town, though, will decide whether to issue the required permit for the project.

The only control the town would have over the project is that residents would have to approve the tax abatement the firm has said it would be seeking for the project.   

"How many places allow a commercial industrial complex on GBR-130 (greenbelt residential) land)? It's mind-boggling. It does not make sense, " said Curt Floyd, who along with several relatives lives in homes on nearby Laurence Eleanor Street on farmland that has been in his family for almost 300 years.

Scott Connuck, the senior project developer for East Point Energy of Charlottesville, Va., said Friday that last week he met for the first time with neighbors to discuss their concerns. He described the meeting as very productive.

"Clearly we have a lot of due diligence to do. We are in the very early stages of this project. We have a long way to go," he said.

Two weeks ago Connuck outlined the project to the Economic Development Commission. The so-called Grid Scale Energy Storage system uses lithium ion batteries and is designed to produce resiliency in the energy grid when power is needed. Renderings of the project show 34 battery enclosures the size of cargo shipping containers and a substation placed on a concrete slab and surrounded by a security fence and trees for screening.  The 27-acre site at 94 Prentice Williams Road owned by Amons Stack LLC, whose principal is Lawrence Williams of Old Mystic, is zoned greenbelt residential, which means 130,000 square feet of land is needed to build a home.

Connuck estimated that the project, which takes electricity from the adjacent Eversource power lines and stores it in batteries for later sale and use, would be worth tens of millions of dollars. He said East Point Energy would be seeking a tax abatement from the town for the project.

After listening to the plan, EDC members agreed to support the project and work with East Point to craft a development agreement, so the town is competitive with other communities that might be trying to lure the project to their town with a tax abatement.

But Floyd and his relatives say they never knew about the EDC meeting because neither East Point nor Williams, their cousin, had told them about the project. They said they learned of it when The Day published a story about the EDC meeting.

At that meeting, Connuck told the EDC they had not reached out to neighbors because the immediate neighbors were relatives who did not oppose it.

The opposition  

In a letter to the Conservation Commission, which heard a presentation on the plan last week, Carolyn Giampe, the director of sustainability & Environmental Management for the Aquarion Water Co., wrote that the proposed site for the battery storage facility is situated within the watershed for the Dean/Palmer Reservoir system that serves more than 14,000 people, the majority of whom live in Stonington.

"The tree clearing and addition of impervious surface will have a permanent negative effect on the water quality of the nearby wetlands, watercourse, and drainage which enters the public drinking water supply reservoir. We believe battery storage is an important part of Connecticut's clean energy future and we understand the difficulty of siting infrastructure projects.  However, we urge the developer to seek a location that does not adversely affect the drinking water supply for the community," she wrote.  

First Selectwoman Danielle Chesebrough said last week the town needs more information about the entire program.

"But I can't see a situation where the community would support that," she said.

Both she and Selectwoman Deborah Downie, a licensed environmental professional, said there are a lot of environmental concerns about the project.

Floyd, his spouse Donna Cristadore, along with relatives Cody Floyd, Wyatt Floyd and Craig Floyd outlined their concerns about the project.  

They said the entrance to the property goes through wetlands and the road leading to the site is between 10 and 17 feet wide. With the need for heavy equipment to access the site for construction and deliver the storage containers, they said the road would be blocked to fire trucks, police and ambulances.

Curt Floyd, the former deputy chief of the Poqounnock Bridge Fire Department in Groton who now works for the National Fire Protection Association, said he has studied lithium ion battery fires across the country. He said such runaway fires can only be extinguished with huge amounts of water but sometimes they are allowed to burn themselves out, which he said could last a week. He said water put on any fire would flow into the Copps Brook watershed that feeds into the Aquarion reservoir. He said fire could spread to the adjacent forest.  

Floyd said the nearest fire hydrant is 2 miles away, which means tankers would have to shuttle water to the fire down the road, which is too narrow for two trucks to pass each other. In addition, he said, residents may have to evacuate.

Cody Floyd questioned what the monitoring procedures would be to determine whether conditions were creating a fire danger.  

Old Mystic Fire Chief Ken Richards, whose department serves Prentice Williams Road, could not be reached to comment.

Curt Floyd said the family is not against technology to reduce carbon emisisons. 

"But not in the middle of the woods in a GBR-130 area," he said. "There are plenty of places Stonington with substation where they could put this that is easier to access with emergency services."  

East Point response

Connuck explained his firm used maps and Google Earth to identify possible locations for such a project.

"There's a limited amount of electrical infrastructure where this makes sense," he said, adding his firm has identified other sites in Connecticut. He declined to say if any of those are in southeastern Connecticut.

Connuck said that typically his firm requires a seven- to 10-year tax abatement to be approved by a community for a project to go forward. Such abatement helps offset large upfront costs for such projects.

As for concern about the location of the project above an aquifer and near a reservoir, Connuck stressed there would be no air or water emissions from the project and no runoff onto adjacent properties.

He said the batteries are contained within nonflammable metal containers, which remain water- and airtight even in a fire. He said when such batteries have caught fire there has been no groundwater contamination. He said risk of fire is very low as the batteries are monitored 24 hours a day and systems can remove oxygen to stop a fire while water and firefighting foam can be used to exteinguish them. In addition, he said, the immediate area around the battery enclosures is gravel with no vegetation that can catch fire.

As for access by emergency vehicles during construction, he said other locations are on rural roads and can be managed to ensure access.

In addition to increased tax revenue for the town as the tax abatement is phased out, Connuck said the project has variety of benefits such as reducing pollution and the need for more electrical infrastructure, improving reliability during blackouts and providing power during peak demand periods.

"Its quiet and it's safe," he said.


Sherman Street bridge replacement on horizon in Norwich

Claire Bessette 

Norwich — Two months behind the anticipated April 1 start of the Sherman Street bridge reconstruction, the city has awarded the $10.3 million contract for the work to Plainville-based Manafort Bros. Inc.

The long-planned project now is expected to begin in June, but the bridge will not completely be closed to traffic until after the school year ends for Norwich Public Schools on June 22, city Public Works Director Patrick McLaughlin said.

The city awarded the contract to Manafort on Friday. The company was the low bidder at $10,319,393, about $200,000 below the second-lowest bidder, McLaughlin said. Bids were received in January, and McLaughlin said it took longer than expected. Manafort still must post a performance bond and sign the contract, expected within about a week, McLaughlin said.

A meeting to set the construction timeline will be scheduled for early June. City emergency responders and school officials will be invited to learn the timing of the closure of a major connector between the Asylum Street/New London Turnpike areas and the Backus Hospital and Norwich Free Academy area.

The project will replace the two bridges on Sherman Street over the Yantic River: the main bridge, built in 1955, and a smaller bridge over an adjacent canal. The larger bridge is rated in poor condition by the state Department of Transportation, with the substructure labeled as satisfactory. The smaller bridge, built in 1920 and reconstructed in 1964, is rated even lower at “serious” condition with a substructure in poor condition.

The sidewalk and asphalt are crumbling, and pipe railings rusted. One section of a chain-link fence between the two bridges is missing.

The $10 million project, paid for with 80% federal funds, 10% state funds and 10% city money, could cause traffic headaches for everyone from city residents to ambulance and school bus drivers and students walking to NFA from Asylum Street and nearby neighborhoods.

Construction is slated to begin with utility work on the Asylum Street side of the bridge before the span is completely closed to traffic for the majority of two construction seasons, in 2022 and 2023. During the winter of 2022-23, the bridge will be reopened as construction shuts down, but it will be closed again in spring of 2023 until completed.

During construction, the vehicular entrance to the Upper Falls Heritage Park, on Sherman Street just past the bridge, will be closed. The park will remain open to pedestrians through a stairway access a bit farther up Sherman Street.

The project calls for replacing the two spans with one “clear span,” which will be raised up 18 inches to avoid potential damage by the flood-prone Yantic River. Asylum Street in the vicinity of the bridge also will be raised 18 inches. The bridge will be shifted 20 feet to the north, toward New London Turnpike, to straighten out the intersection. A new three-way stop sign equipped with flashing lights, erected in July 2020 to improve traffic flow on Sherman Street, will remain after the construction.

A large sewage pipe suspended from the bridge, exposed to the weather and potential damage from flood-borne debris rushing beneath, will be incorporated into the new bridge. Norwich Public Utilities will construct a pump station on the Asylum Street side of the river as part of the project.

The Sherman Street bridge is a major crossing point over the Yantic River, and detours will take drivers miles away along New London Turnpike to Norwichtown or West Main Street into downtown.

The Norwich Fire Department already is well experienced with the detours, Fire Chief and Emergency Management Director Tracy Montoya said. In October 2015, the city reduced the weight limit on the bridge due to its deteriorating condition.

“We don’t typically send fire apparatus over that bridge, because of the weight limit,” Montoya said.

Montoya is concerned that the bridge closure and construction could cause traffic backups on Asylum Street that could delay emergency vehicles longer.


Developer proposes distribution center, offices in Bloomfield

Andrew Larson

Douglas Street Ventures LLC, a Farmington-based development company, is proposing to build a 74,520-square-foot warehouse and distribution center in Bloomfield, including 5,000-square-feet of office space.

The 8.7-acre property at 59 and 69 Douglas St. is near the intersection of routes 218 and 187 and provides easy access to Interstate 91. The land, which is vacant, is owned by Douglas Street Ventures, a limited liability company controlled by Steven Levesque.

The building would be one story and a maximum of 44-feet tall, and the parking lot would have 72 spaces.

The western side of the building, facing away from Douglas Street, would have 20 loading docks with 36 additional parking spaces.

There would be three access points off of Douglas — two for trucks and one for cars. Fifty-five trailer parking spaces are proposed at the southern end of the property.

The company has applied for a special permit and a public hearing is scheduled before the Planning and Zoning Commission in June.

The property is in an industrial zone, which the company says is suitable for the project.

The site plan includes landscape buffers to mitigate views of the proposed site along with spillover light and noise to nearby properties.

Douglas Street Ventures plans to lease the property to a tenant, who has not been named.




May 26, 2022

CT Construction Digest Thursday May 26, 2022

CLICK HERE FOR TODAYS BOND COMMISSUION AGENDA



Stamford and New Haven are ‘economic powerhouses’ but there’s room for growth elsewhere in CT, official says

Luther Turmelle

David Lehman, Connecticut’s Department of Economic and Community Development commissioner, called the Stamford and New Haven areas “economic powerhouses” Tuesday, but said for the rest of the state to follow suit, more communities need to offer a broader array of housing opportunities.

Lehman made his comments during the Greater New Haven Chamber of Commerce’s annual Regional Real Estate and Construction forecast event, which was held at WoodWinds in Branford. He said there are 100,000 job openings in the state right now and only 50,000 people looking for work.

“We need to focus on re-energizing the workforce,” Lehman said.

One way to do that, he said, is creating more housing at a variety of prices points, including homes that are affordable for people just starting their careers.

“If you look at (annual) new housing permits, we’ve been stuck at about 4,000 for a long time,” Lehman said. “We need to be doing 10,000 to 15,000 new housing permits per year if we want to be economically relevant 10 to 15 years from now. And the type of housing needs to be broad-based.”

Lehman said he favors “using a carrot, not a stick,” in order to achieve that level of new housing development. One thing he said that has proven to be successful in Hartford is offering developers low-interest loans and other incentives to convert vacant offices into living space.

One developer who is already bullish on New Haven is Darren Seid, president and founder of Epimoni, a New York City development firm that is behind two housing project in the Elm City’s Wooster Square neighborhood.

The 299-unit Olive and Wooster Apartments, which also includes 8,000 square feet of retail, is already 40 percent leased. And Seid’s firm is currently designing a 185-unit complex at 20 Fair St., which is adjacent to the Olive and Wooster complex.

The Olive and Wooster Apartments complex includes luxury apartments as well as co-living spaces for Yale graduate students or young people starting their careers, according to Seid.

Construction of the 20 Fair St. complex is expected to start by the end of this year or during the first quarter of next year and completed in 2025, Seid said.

“The market is so robust right now,” Seid said. He said New Haven’s growing reputation as a biotechnology center, combined with the presence of Yale University, make the city an attractive place for people from outside the state to move into.

Seid said he’s researching the viability doing of other residential development projects in neighboring communities. One community Seid is especially interested in is Branford, he said.


Torrington High seniors learn about apprenticeship program

LANCE REYNOLD

TORRINGTON – Torrington High School senior Jordan Ortega said he wants to follow in his uncle’s footsteps and become an electrician.

To get his foot through the door, Ortega is hoping he gets selected for an apprenticeship program connected to the $179.5 million Torrington Middle/High School project. He applied for such an opportunity Wednesday during a construction career fair in his school’s gymnasium, where THS upperclassmen and alumni connected with electricians, boilermakers, carpenters and ironworkers.

“It will keep me on track and going forward, helping out and putting food on our family table,” Ortega said. “I want to return the favor to my family and what they gave me, and put it to good use.”

The Greater Hartford-New Britain Building Trades Council, a union that represents about 30,000 construction workers statewide, is offering pre-apprenticeships and apprenticeships through a 10-year project labor agreement the City Council approved last year.

Project officials want 25% of hired construction workers to be city residents and another 30% from Litchfield County. More than 300 city families are affiliated with the Building Trades Council, said Joe Toner, council executive director.

Those who applied Wednesday may be accepted into the trades without needing to complete a preapprenticeship to gain basic knowledge, Toner said. Completing an apprenticeship program is required before individuals work on the 310,000-square-foot, grade 7-12 school, he said.

The council is working with district officials to recruit 48 to 60 THS students or graduates per year for its apprenticeship programs through 2031, building committee Co-Chairman Ed Arum said. There will be four separate apprenticeship programs per year, with 12 to 15 students enrolled, he noted.

Torrington High School students and alumni learn about apprenticeships and preapprenticeships connected to the Torrington Middle/High School building project Wednesday during a construction career fair at Torrington High. Steven Valenti Republican-American

After the 12 to 15 students or graduates are selected, they will attend an academy in Pomfret, where they will take a 40-hour training course to learn about the building trades, Toner said. Meeting the 25% city resident threshold could regenerate about $12 million in wages and benefits in the city, he said.

The apprenticeships align with the school’s career and college pathways program, guidance counselor Ryan Dickens said.

“It is a direct connection to what we are hoping to at least tailor our program to get them directly into one of these preapprenticeship programs,” he said. “When we can boost it up on our own end, it will also boost their interest and success rate down the line.”







May 25, 2022

CT Construction Digest Wednesday May 25, 2022

Cost increases at State Pier to be subject of Bond Commission vote


Greg Smith 

Former Parkade developer files suit against town of ManchesterThe state Bond Commission on Thursday will vote on a $20 million infusion of funds to cover escalating costs for the reconstruction of State Pier in New London into an offshore wind hub.

The Connecticut Port Authority, which is overseeing the project, announced in March that additional money was needed to cover costs of delays and to speed up work on the project.

That dollar figure turns out to be about $15 million.

The port authority last month approved $5.8 million to cover the costs associated with delays, mostly blamed on challenges to the permitting of the project. On Tuesday, it approved an additional $8.4 million, in part to accelerate work at State Pier and ensure most of the work is completed by April 28.

What was a $235.5 million project is now a $255.5 million project. The cost estimate in 2019 was $93 million and jumped to $235.5 million after the project design was completed.

The $20 million that is up for approval this week by the state Bond Commission would cover the estimated $15 million needed by the port authority and provide an additional $5 million to cover other unanticipated costs, port authority board Chairman David Kooris said Tuesday.

“That would bring our available funds to $255 (million) which gives us some additional resources available to serve as an owner’s contingency in case additional unforeseen conditions or costs arise, which is possible,” Kooris said.

He said there is still $7 million of the original $11 million allotted for contingency costs incorporated into the overall project budget.

Bond Commission approval on Thursday would bring the state’s share of the project's cost to $180.5 million. Danish offshore wind company Ă˜rsted and its partner Eversource, which will be leasing State Pier, are contributing $75 million, including a $22.5 million pledge by Deepwater Wind. Ă˜rsted acquired Deepwater Wind in 2018.

At a special meeting Tuesday, Kooris said the updated project costs should not be a surprise and were consistent with what has been discussed over the past few months. The port authority announced publicly on March 22 that costs would increase by between $12 million and $15 million, but had not firmed up a figure at that time. Gov. Ned Lamont, during a tour of State Pier in March, reiterated his commitment to the project in the face of rising costs, calling the project “transformative for our state and our region.”

About $5.3 million of the $8.4 million approved on Tuesday would cover costs associated with labor.

Marlin Peterson, a program coordinator with State Pier construction administrator AECOM, said work crews will change from a 40-hour work week to a 60-hour work week, with crews working 10-hour shifts six days per week starting in June and continuing through September.

The port authority also is ordering more steel preemptively to account for unanticipated depths at which the piles are being driven around the pier. That cost is about $1.5 million and the steel, if unused, would become an asset of the port authority, Kooris said.

The board, at its regular meeting next month, is prepared to lock in the guaranteed maximum price, or GMP, for construction work at $217 million — $13 million more than the target GMP of $204 million. The additional money associated with the project pays for soft costs, such as engineering fees and project management.

“None of this has anything to do with inflation,” Kooris said of the cost increase. “None of this has anything to do with rising costs for material or labor. All of our rates and material prices were baked in. This is the cost of keeping our contractor working for longer than anticipated because permits were delayed ... and the additional costs associated with the additional work hours to make up for some of that delay.”

Acceleration of work on the project is essential in order to achieve a substantial completion of the work no later than Feb. 28, port authority interim Executive Director Ulysses Hammond said.

Hammond said it will be a “seminal milestone” when terminal operations at State Pier begin in March 2023. He said offshore wind components are scheduled to begin arriving at State Pier in April 2023, with subsequent staging and pre-assembly services starting in May 2023. The initial handling and transport of components for offshore wind is to begin a month later.

“Based on this schedule, State Pier will be the staging port for the next three utility-scale offshore wind farms in the United States, including South Fork, Revolution Wind and Sunrise Wind, which collectively will generate, according to publicly available data, enough wind power and clean energy to power more than one million homes," Hammond said.


Commission vote dims prospects for proposed RV park in Preston

Brian Hallenbeck 

Preston — Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission seemingly scuttled a proposed RV park on Mashantucket Pequot-owned land at the junction of routes 2 and 164 on Tuesday night, voting 4-3 against a motion that it be approved with certain modifications. 

The vote, however, is not the final word on the project.

Further action on the developer’s special-exception and site-plan applications for the project was unanimously tabled until the commission’s June 28 meeting.

“People could change their minds,” said Richard Chalifoux, the commission vice chairman, who chaired Tuesday night’s meeting in the absence of Chairman Art Moran Jr.

Prior to the vote, commission member Denise Beale voiced opposition to Blue Water Development’s proposed development, citing its proximity to Preston Plains Middle School and residences near Avery Pond. Joining her in voting against the motion for approval were members Charles Raymond, Doreen Rankin and Terri Eickel, an alternate.

Voting in favor of the motion were Chalifoux, Mike Sinko, who made the motion, and Fred Eddy, an alternate.

“While I feel the applicant has taken every effort in addressing the concerns of townspeople, I still have my concerns,” Beale said before the vote. “Though it complies with the regulations, it is a special exception. It’s the town's responsibility to review whether it is in the best interest of the town.”

“In the end, it’s really our responsibility to represent the people’s wishes — that’s what a special exception is,” she said.

Following the vote, Sinko said the commission’s only role is to determine whether an application conforms to the regulations.

Town Planner Kathy Warzecha recommended approval of Blue Water’s applications, conditioned on a list of 23 modifications, including the elimination of several proposed campsites, the addition of certain buffers, restrictions on music festivals and the amplification of sound, and maintenance of the stormwater system.

She said she must now prepare a recommendation that the application be denied, based on the objections of those members who voted against the motion.

Tuesday night's vote came after both the planning commission and the town’s Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission held public hearings that continued for several hours over multiple sessions.

On April 19, the wetlands commission voted 3-2 in favor of issuing a permit for the project. One of the seven-member commission’s members was absent and three recused themselves, requiring two alternates to be seated prior to the vote.

The RV park and campground resort would be built on three Route 2 parcels the tribe owns on Avery Pond. Much of the 65-acre site is in a resort commercial zone, while the rest is zoned for residential development.

Residents of Avery Pond neighborhoods have opposed the project. A petition bearing the signatures of 400 people opposed to the project was submitted to the commission last month.

In the face of the opposition, Blue Water downsized the project to 280 campsites and eliminated a dock, a boardwalk, tent sites along the pond and one bathhouse.


Former Parkade developer files suit against town of Manchester

Skyler Frazer

The former developers of the Parkade site redevelopment in Manchester on Tuesday filed a suit against the town, alleging they were wrongfully terminated from the project, according to court records.

Manchester Parkade 1 LLC, the company picked in 2019 to redevelop the former Parkade site on Broad Street, filed the suit in Hartford Superior Court alleging town officials breached a development agreement for the project when the town announced in January it was nixing the partnership.

Harry Freeman, who is principal of Manchester Parkade 1 LLC along with his business partner Michael Licamele, said in an interview they believe they had been fulfilling the intent of the agreement when the town announced it was moving on.

“We had an agreement with the town that we worked very hard on, and we spent a lot of money, and the town just decided in January to just change their mind. But that's not really allowed under the agreement,” Licamele said.

Manchester officials announced in January they ceased their partnership with Manchester Parkade 1, citing numerous delays and an unclear timeline as reasons for moving on from the Easton-based developer.

Freeman and Licamele said the decision took them by surprise at the time, and the two said the lawsuit was the last thing they wanted to do regarding the project.

“You can't just unilaterally decide that you don't want to do the agreement anymore,” Licamele said. “They are claiming that the agreement expired — they keep using that phrase — but agreements like this don't expire. If you feel that somebody is in default on an agreement, because they're not meeting a deadline or time, you have to send them a notice, they have a chance to fix it, then after that you have a chance to cancel the agreement.”

Freeman said they’ve already pumped more than $1.2 million into the project. A Manchester town official didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

As for what they want out of the suit, Freeman and Licamele hope to continue work on the former Parkade site. They want the town to honor the previous agreement, which they say is still valid, and pay for any damages associated with the suit and halting of the project back in January. The suit also seeks an injunction preventing the town from entering into a development agreement for the site with another entity.

“We remain committed to doing the project,” Freeman said. “We worked tirelessly with the town and countless consultants to come up with a project that we think even exceeded the town’s expectations in terms of quality and the diversity of uses.”

The suit was filed by Hartford law firm Brown, Paindiris & Scott LLP.

After moving on from Manchester Parkade 1 LLC, the town issued another request-for-proposal for the 23.2-acre property in March. That RFP closes Thursday.

In 2019 the town named Manchester Parkade I LLC as the preferred developer for the site. The developer’s planned $140 million project, called Silk City Green, would have converted the vacant Broad Street site into a mixed-use development with housing, retail space and a hotel. The project was expected to break ground on initial construction this spring.

The town and Manchester Parkade I signed a development agreement in April 2021, which was subsequently twice extended as the developer grappled with financing issues related to Department of Housing and Urban Development funding. Those funding issues were resolved, the developer said.

The town first bought the multi-parcel property in 2011 after Manchester voters approved an $8 million bond to revitalize the Broad Street area. Since then, all buildings on the site have been removed and it's been prepped for development


New Britain Mayor Stewart smashes coconut to celebrate keystone apartment project for Myrtle Street revival

Michael Puffer

Westport developer Amit Lakhotia and New Britain Mayor Erin Stewart each smashed a coconut outside of the former Stanley Black & Decker headquarters in New Britain Tuesday, celebrating the launch of a $7.5 million effort to transform the vacant building into apartments.

Lakhotia is Hindu, originally from India. It is his custom to break open a coconut to mark special events, like the birth of a child or the launch of a building project. Lakhotia opened his coconut with a single, sharp, swing. Stewart took a couple swings, which wasn’t bad for her first attempt.

For Stewart, Tuesday’s ceremony celebrated a milestone project in a city that has seen a dramatic increase in development interest.

Lahkotia alone is on track to build or renovate about 285 apartments in various projects, with additional prospects under development.

“The city of new Britain is truly experiencing a renaissance unlike anything that has been seen in decades,” Stewart said Tuesday in a ceremony in the foyer of 480 Myrtle St.

Lakhotia plans to renovate the 135,000-square-foot building into 106 market-rate apartments over the course of a little more than a year. He's become a prominent developer in the Hardware City. 

New Britain Economic Development Director Jack Benjamin credited the city administration’s foresight into developing a special district for the Myrtle Street area that offers flexibility of use to help revive buildings that have long been dormant or underused.

 “The work here will truly bring more excitement and investment to the city,” Benjamin said.

Stewart said the redevelopment of 480 Myrtle will compliment other projects in the industrial corridor, including the $1 billion data center development right next door, on another piece of the former Stanley Black & Decker campus. Massachusetts-based EIP LLC has state approval for a 44-megawatt “Energy & Innovation Park,” which will provide space to several information-heavy tenant companies.

Stewart said demolition to prepare the site of the “Energy & Innovation Park” will begin this summer. Fuel cells will start arriving in about 18 months, she said.

“The developments we will see in the Myrtle Street corridor in the next decade or so are really going to be monumental,” Stewart said.

Lakhotia, for his part, said he was attracted to New Britain because city staff and officials are incredibly responsive and helpful. That praise was echoed by the George Taweh, president of TLong Construction. Taweh is outfitting several New Britain projects for Lakhotia, including 480 Myrtle St. He is also an investor in each of the projects.

“This is probably the best town to work with from Boston to (Washington) D.C.,” said Taweh, who has worked projects up and down the East Coast. 


Developer proposes adding warehouse and distribution center in Bloomfield

Don Stacom

A Farmington-based developer is looking to build a 74,000-square-foot warehouse in Bloomfield, the latest in a recent series of storage and logistics projects in central Connecticut.

Douglas Street Ventures LLC is seeking town approval to build on a little under 9 acres along Douglas Street.

The company hasn’t specified what business or businesses would use the facility, but it proposing three access points off of Douglas — two for trucks and one for cars.

The company earlier this year notified owners of about two dozen nearby properties that it is proposing the warehouse and distribution center, which is in an industrial zone but only a couple of blocks from the closest homes.

The town plan and zoning commission was scheduled to hear Douglas Street Ventures’ presentation last month, but rescheduled the hearing for June. The company needs a site plan approval as well as a special permit to proceed.

The state has spent the past decade encouraging industrial and warehouse development in central Connecticut, particularly in the region around Bradley International Airport. Depending on traffic, the Bloomfield site is roughly a 15- to 20-minute trip from the airport.

In its application for zoning approval, Douglas Street Ventures notes that the town has also supported this kind of business.

“The Bloomfield Plan of Conservation and Development greatly encourages the promotion of industrial development in town given its proximity to Bradley International Airport and major highways,” the company wrote. “The proposed site plan serves to increase industrial development in an area that is already zoned for industrial uses.”

Nearby Windsor, South Windsor and Windsor Locks have been adding major warehouses for more than a decade, including mega-centers for Coca Cola, Amazon, Home Depot, Dollar Tree, Walgreen’s, FedEx and others.

Bloomfield’s share of that market has been a bit less than its neighbors, but it nevertheless has several substantial logistics facilities. Affiliated with TJC Companies, for instance, is the HomeGoods distribution center that measures more than 350,000 square feet.

Douglas Street Ventures proposes a single-story, 74,520-square-foot building that would be no more than 44 feet high. The property is just a block southwest of the intersection of routes 218 and 187.

It would have parking for more than 100 cars and 55 trailers, with 20 loading bays.

South Windsor-based Design Professionals, the engineer for the project, told planners that a warehouse would benefit Bloomfield.

“The proposed development at 59 & 69 Douglas Street provides a vital opportunity for this industrially zoned property to enhance the value of these properties and meet a growing need from warehouse/distribution centers in Bloomfield,” the company said in the application.

“This will bring a new, growing company to the town or provide ample expansion area for one of the town’s many existing, successful companies,” it said.

Douglas Street Ventures is promising extensive landscaping as a noise and light buffer for other properties.

The public hearing is expected to be held June 23 starting at 7 p.m. As of now the commission is still meeting remotely; anyone interested in joining the meeting online can get directions at bloomfieldct.gov/town-plan-and-zoning-commission.



May 24, 2022

CT Construction Digest Tuesday May 24, 2022

State Pier Costs Continue Upward as Port Authority Officials Race to Meet March Timeline

BRENDAN CROWLEY

 HARTFORD – As the cost to redevelop the New London State Pier continues to escalate, lawmakers are being asked to approve another $20 million in bonding to fund the project – which now carries a price tag of $255.5 million.

Hailed in 2019 as a $93 million project to redevelop the pier into a hub for offshore wind construction – with the offshore wind partnership of Eversource and Ă˜rsted paying $57.5 million of the cost – the state’s investment now stands at $160.5 million, and the State Bond Commission will decide Thursday whether to approve another $20 million in funding.

The cost of the project has increased repeatedly since it was first announced in 2019 – jumping to $157 million after a redesign to accommodate the Cross Sound Ferry, then to $235.5 million as officials said the design was completed. The cost of the project was most recently estimated in March at about $250 million – an increase blamed on permitting delays that sped up the construction timeline.

Asked what caused the increase to $255.5 million, and if that was the guaranteed maximum price of the project, Connecticut Port Authority spokesman Andrew Lavigne said the Authority’s board would be discussing the price at its meeting at noon on Tuesday.

State Rep. Holly Cheeseman, R-East Lyme, the lone lawmaker of the Bond Commission who represents a part of southeastern Connecticut, said she was concerned that the price continued to increase after she was assured there would be no need for additional funding.

When the Bond Commission approved an additional $55 million for the project last April, Cheeseman pushed then-Office of Policy and Management Deputy Secretary Kosta Diamantis to say that $235.5 million was the “actual figure” for the project – which Cheeseman said she understood to mean the cost would not go any higher.

Cheeseman said she has not heard an explanation behind this request for $20 million in additional funding, and said she was interested to hear the reasoning from Gov. Ned Lamont and his staff at the Bond Commission meeting on Thursday.

“I find this very worrying,” Cheeseman said. “I understand there are supply chain problems, but to receive repeated assurances that there will be no need for additional funds, and to have that not be the case, I don’t think it shows good stewardship, good oversight.”

Cheeseman said she understood that Eversource and Ă˜rsted might not want to contribute more than they originally agreed to, but she said that could have been a conversation to have considering the companies have been “fairly flexible” in working with the Port Authority on the project. 

She noted that the companies did not pull back any of their contribution to the project, even though they could have withdrawn their support as permits were delayed last year.

But she said the project seemed to be an “ideal use” for federal infrastructure funding, and that U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm’s visit to the State Pier on Friday highlighted the commitment of President Joe Biden’s administration to offshore wind.

“I know there are very strict guidelines from the Treasury on what the infrastructure funding can be used for,” Cheeseman said. “On the other hand, I would have thought [Granholm’s visit] was an excellent argument for demonstrating the federal government’s commitment to this kind of project, and perhaps a favorable view of using infrastructure money for just that purpose.”

Lavigne said the Port Authority applied for federal funds for the project in 2020 when Donald Trump was president, and was denied. He said that the current administration is more supportive of offshore wind, so the project might be more competitive for federal funding now, but the authority can’t wait for federal funding if State Pier is to be ready as a staging area for Eversource and Ă˜rsted’s South Fork Wind Project in March 2023.


Torrington school project partnership ready to start building

Emily M. Olson

TORRINGTON — Architects of the new middle and high school building project, approved by voters in 2020, are nearly ready to begin a three-year presence on Besse Drive this summer.

The S/L/A/M Collaborative, architect, working in partnership with city and Torrington Public Schools officials, Construction Solutions Group of East Hartford, and construction manager Torrington-based O&G Industries, said they expect to begin construction in October. But there’s a lot to do before the first shovel hits dirt.

Amy Samuelson, principle architect with SLAM, has been involved with the project’s development since her firm was hired in 2021. “It’s going to transform how the city educates its young people,” she said.

SLAM designers have worked with the public school district, the Board of Education and the school building committee throughout the design phase to ensure the learning environments and configuration of the new school will reflect the needs and expectations of the Torrington community. Designers also included some of the city’s industrial past as they planned the building.

The project originally was approved by voters in November 2020 for $159 million. In January 2022, voters approved adding an additional $20 million to the project. School building committee Co-Chairmen Mario Longobucco and Ed Arum came to the City Council in December 2021 asking for approval to add the $20 million, citing increased enrollment and rising costs for construction and materials.

The biggest challenge for SLAM, Samuelson said, was to design a 310,000-square-foot building that prioritized and balanced the district’s existing educational programs with the latest trends and innovation.

“For example, we’re providing an engineering lab, which is meant to complement what they already have,” she said. “Balancing new technology with what’s already there has always been a big part of this plan, while keeping reimbursement in mind. It’s always a balance.”

Another challenge, she said, is managing the project “to have room for a real, transformative design while keeping the old school up and running.”

“Right away this summer, people are going to see how we’re separating the construction zone from the high school, which will still be open, of course,” Samuelson said. “We’re rerouting traffic away from the buses, because we’re adding another layer of vehicles and traffic to the site. This summer, we’ll set it all up so when the students start school in the fall, they’ll be safe.”

The other big hurdle for SLAM and its partners is moving the middle school students to the new building once it’s completed.

“We had to keep in mind additional parking for middle school staff and faculty, and more room for their athletic fields,” Samuelson said. “The high and middle school students will share some of the fields, but we’ve been able to site additional fields on the property, once the old building is demolished.

“But it’s still a challenge, because we have to fit more than what was originally there,” she said. “So it’s not like other places, where we replace a building in kind. Its much larger.”

The combined middle-high school building will be constructed on the existing campus on the 31-acre Besse Drive property. The old building will stay open during construction and eventually will be razed.

“It will be up to the school district, and the middle school administration, to decide when the middle school students move in,” Samuelson said. “The high school will have to move out, but the middle school students are in their current building and it’s working fine for them. They might move the middle school in August 2025.”

Preparation of the area is expected this summer, including relocating utilities, and construction is scheduled to begin in October, with an opening date of February 2025, SLAM officials said. Demolition of the old building and construction of the new gym and athletic fields will begin in March 2025, with a planned completion date of January 2026, they said.

According to SLAM, the building has been designed with separate entrances and wings for a three-story middle school and a four-story high school. Those wings will be connected by shared facilities on the main floor — an auditorium and performance stage, two separate dining rooms, two gyms and support spaces for student athletes.

The middle school, according to SLAM, will have two STEM classrooms and a computer coding lab. Classrooms for grades 7-8 and some administrative spaces and support service offices will be on the two upper floors.

Torrington High School has a career pathways program that provides hands-on training opportunities for education, health and wellness, business, military/JROTC and STEM/technology. The project design includes additions to that program such as a culinary lab, health classrooms and a sports medicine-athletic trainer room. In addition, the school will include various new learning areas for special education students.

Other program improvements in the new building are an automotive shop, construction technology lab and an engineering lab; a 480-seat auditorium with a courtyard; a band room for up to 125 people for high and middle school students, and orchestra, chorus and music technology spaces; as well as video production, art and ceramics labs.

“The industrial and performing arts culture of Torrington was an inspiration for our design,” said Julija Singer, AIA, design principal, SLAM. “We enjoyed working with the community and sharing their passion for designing spaces for students where exploration, openness, and creativity will flourish. The new building is a place that offers that and much more.”

Central administration offices will be located on the fourth floor of the high school wing and will have a separate entrance. Those offices now are housed in a building on Migeon Avenue.

SLAM Communications Director Marie Bonelli sees the new high school as a landmark for the city.

“It will be like a flagship,” she said. “I think people will have a sense of pride in it.”

Samuelson said she is confident about the timeline established by SLAM and O&G Industries. “O&G controls the construction schedule, and I think it’s accurate to assume that a building of that size can go up in 30 months,” she said. “When we say ready for occupancy in February 2025, that’s when the high-schoolers will move into their new building, and then they’ll tear down the old one.”

Factors including the economy, supply line challenges and the rising cost of living all will play a part in the project.

“We’re hoping for a crystal ball, but we don’t have one,” Samuelson said. “The economy is unpredictable right now. ... We’re designing, and keeping tabs on everything. We’re hoping for the best.”


Officials: Norwalk Hospital plans $250M expansion, but hasn’t yet submitted zoning application

Abigail Brone

NORWALK — Norwalk Hospital has announced the facility’s largest expansion ever — worth more than $200 million — but has not yet submitted its plans to the city’s zoning department, officials said.

Last summer, Nuvance Health, which owns and operates Norwalk Hospital, announced plans for a $220 million expansion of the hospital, with an emphasis on the facility’s maternity services.

This month, a New Canaan couple donated an additional $20 million to the project. The total estimated cost of the project is about $250 million, according to a hospital statement.

To construct the seven-floor, 188,000-square-foot addition, the hospital plans to demolish the Tracey and community pavilions, which were constructed in 1918 and 1953. The new pavilion will be located at the southeast corner of the hospital campus.

With hundreds of millions invested and plans for the new facility to open within four years, Nuvance has yet to apply with the city’s Planning and Zoning Commission to acquire permission for construction to commence.

Norwalk Hospital spokesperson Amy Forni confirmed that while hospital administrators have met with city officials, the application hasn’t been submitted.

“Our planning, design and construction team has met with all the city departments to review the plans,” Forni said. “They will be submitting final construction plans for final review and approval.”

The hospital staff met with at least six departments and agencies from the city to discuss the project, Forni said.

“As with any other large project, we have had preliminary discussions with public works, fire, zoning, water department, WPCA and TMP to gather information, so the project, applications, plans and reports meet or exceed various standards,” Forni said. “This project will be thoroughly vetted by these departments and others, and by the Planning & Zoning Commission, once a formal submission has been made.”

Forni did not specify when the hospital intends to submit the project plans.

The new building is anticipated to open in winter 2025, according to the project announcement.

As of last week, no project proposed for Norwalk Hospital was listed on the Zoning Department’s database of approved and pending developments.

Norwalk spokesperson Michelle Woods Matthews said a meeting between city officials and hospital representatives occurred four months ago. Woods Matthews was also unaware of when Nuvance plans to submit the hospital expansion application.

“Staff members of the city met with members of the Norwalk Hospital, including Peter Cordeau, president of Norwalk Hospital, in early February for an update on the timing and plans,” Woods Matthews said. “Norwalk Hospital let the city know they would be submitting something to Zoning shortly. We're unsure of when the hospital plans to submit the zoning application materials, but expect it in the near future.”

Woods Matthews said the city is looking forward to the Norwalk Hospital expansion.

“We are supportive of having a world-class medical facility in Norwalk and are excited to see what they propose,” she said.


New $875M state fund to pay for infrastructure, brownfields and more in 'historically underserved' communities

Michael Puffer

Hartford, Waterbury, New Haven, New Britain and 41 additional “historically underserved” communities in Connecticut can now apply to an $875 million state grant pool for community investments.

The taxpayer-funded “Community Investment Fund 2030” could help eligible municipalities and their economic development agencies pay for infrastructure upgrades, brownfield remediation, public facilities, new affordable housing and small business assistance programs.

Application materials are available now and are due by July 25 for a first round of funding that will distribute up to $75 million. The investments – to be paid through future state bonding – must win approval from a 21-member review board, then the governor and, ultimately, the state Bond Commission.

“Our administration is continuing to make historic investments in improving the economic vibrancy of our neighborhoods, with a focus on helping those that have been historically underserved gain access to good-paying jobs and benefits,” Gov. Ned Lamont said through a release. “The Community Investment Fund 2030 is another way that we are encouraging impactful development and small business support for areas of Connecticut that have been left behind for too long.”

The minimum grant request is $250,000. There is no upper limit.

Thomas Hyde, CEO of the Naugatuck Valley Regional Development Corp., said the fund is exciting because it offers the prospect of getting enough money to finish a brownfield cleanup through a single round of funding and work.

Traditional state brownfield grants provide up to $2 million, often not enough to clean up massive industrial sites in Waterbury that were abandoned by metals manufacturers decades ago.

That has left Waterbury to clean as far as eligible moneys allow on some sites, then halt to wait for more funding.

New Britain Mayor Erin Stewart said her community will apply any grants received toward transforming its most needy neighborhoods. Her administration is eager to learn more about the process.

“The influx of opportunities for funding quality of life projects for Connecticut’s municipalities could be transformative for our future,” Stewart said.

The fund will be administered by the state Department of Economic and Community Development and overseen by a 21-member board co-chaired by House Speaker Matt Ritter (D-Hartford) and Sen. President Pro Tempore Martin Looney (D-New Haven).

“These capital funds will be critically important for projects, especially in urban areas that have infrastructure needs that haven’t been adequately met for some time,” Looney said. “They’ll also be a benefit to nonprofits and municipalities.”

Ritter described the eight-year grant program as “a major priority.”

“This funding can be a driver of transformational economic change and growth in communities across Connecticut,” Ritter said.

In addition to promoting economic or community development, projects must be designed to further consistent, fair, impartial treatment of all individuals, including those belonging to underserved and marginalized communities, including people of color, religious minorities, rural residents, members of the LGBTQ+ community and people impacted by poverty and inequality.

Additional information and application materials can be found at portal.ct.gov/communityinvestmentfund.



May 23, 2022

CT Construction Digest Monday May 23, 2033

THIS WEEKS BOND COMMISSION AGENDA


Energy Secretary on State Pier Project: ‘We want to replicate this’

Sten Spinella 

U.S. Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm said during her visit to eastern Connecticut Friday that President Joe Biden has singled out Connecticut, and Waterford and New London in particular, as examples of how the country can reach its clean energy goals.

Granholm traveled throughout eastern Connecticut during her visit on Friday, including a stop at UConn to tour the Energy Department's Southern New England Industrial Assessment Center. Her two final stops were at Millstone Nuclear Power Station in Waterford and the State Pier in New London.

Millstone

Granholm was joined by U.S. Rep. Joe Courtney, D-2nd District, State Rep. Kathleen McCarty, R-Waterford, Waterford First Selectman Rob Brule and many Dominion Energy workers for a tour of Millstone on Friday.

Members of the group, comprised of the news media, politicians, their staff, and Dominion staff, traveled across the power station and into the unit 1 control room. At that point, the group split up, as a smaller group of Granholm and others went inside.

The group joined back up at the dry cast storage site. In addition to spent fuel pools, Millstone has dry storage in metal canisters encased in concrete, which can be stored for decades. There are federal efforts to find a national repository underway, with $20 million allocated in the federal budget both last year and this year for a Request for Information process where the federal government seeks localities that would welcome such a repository. Courtney said the budget for 2023 contains $53 million to that effect.

After Dominion officials answered questions from Granholm, Granholm took questions from the news media while standing adjacent to the nuclear waste storage facility.

Granholm said solving the waste issue is an important part of relying on renewable energy.

"Clearly, we want to be able to continue to use these plants and the ones we want to build, and right now nuclear fission has waste, and so we've got to figure out where that's going to be solved," she said. "A lot of communities raised their hands and said, yes, we are excited to have a nuclear plant, but they didn't all volunteer to host the waste. So in order to make good to those communities, we have to have a consent-based siting process for the waste. So we've begun that."

About 200 communities responded to the federal RFI expressing interest in building nuclear power in the community, but, Granholm said, a much smaller percentage of these communities expressed a willingness for further conversation about storing the nuclear waste.

"There are communities that are willing to engage in that conversation," Granholm said. "And those communities would have to be compensated, there's infrastructure issues, et cetera, we want to make sure that they are made whole for doing this service to the country. That conversation's ongoing, and we will be putting out another RFI based on the first before the end of the year."

Granholm concluded the impromptu press conference discussing why Millstone is essential to the state's and the country's clean energy goals.

"This facility, especially for this region, is huge. It represents 40% of your power and over 90% of your clean power, so this is really important to get to the goal of 100% clean electricity by 2035, which is the president's goal," Granholm said. "It's one of the reasons why your Congressman has been such an advocate for finding the solution for waste but also for nuclear power. You get a lot of your power from natural gas, but this particular site is critical to reach your goals."

Dominion officials maintained that it can safely store the spent fuel, but urged Granholm for a federal site to be chosen.

Brule, along with other local actors past and present, have expressed frustration with the fact that there is nuclear waste in town. Brule has said he wants Dominion to adhere to the original agreement, and maintains that nuclear waste puts the community in danger in multiple ways.

A bill passed in this spring's legislative session would exempt Millstone Power Station from a state nuclear power facility construction moratorium.

The bill is meant to allow the state's existing nuclear power facilities — Millstone — to expand to other nuclear technologies on-site, but not to build a third full-scale reactor.

As Dominion Energy New England Policy Director Mary Nuara wrote in public testimony on the bill, "Dominion Energy supports the state's efforts to explore all options available, including advanced nuclear technologies like small modular reactors, to achieve its long-term decarbonization goals."

The bill was supported on a bipartisan basis in both the state House and Senate. Senate Bill 10, also passed this past legislative session, requires the state to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions from electricity supplied to Connecticut customers by 2040, which legislators say can't happen without the full-scale inclusion of renewable energy.

The federal government had originally committed to taking possession of nuclear waste from facilities like Millstone but later reneged, meaning Millstone stores its used fuel on site.

Dominion Senior Vice President and chief nuclear officer Dan Stoddard said Friday that Dominion will not begin planning on building small modular reactors at Millstone until a new power purchase agreement is arrived at, and until Millstone extends its operating license out to 80 years. At that point, they will begin looking closely at the possibility of building such reactors at Millstone.

Granholm's trip to Millstone follows a Thursday exchange between Blumenthal and Granholm during a Senate Committee on Armed Services meeting. Blumenthal noted the importance of cybersecurity for facilities like Millstone.

"I would suggest that we need cybersecurity in existing industrial control systems — nuclear, wind, solar — not only new ones but those being built ... We are vulnerable," Blumenthal said. "I will be interested tomorrow to hear and see some of your suggestions about how we can safeguard our cybersecurity, particularly on nuclear."

Granholm said in response that the National Nuclear Security Administration has the same concerns as Blumenthal.

"They have hired an evaluation to happen and that evaluator has identified some points of excellence but also some points of challenge, and the points of challenge involve further investments in the work force ...  as well as infrastructure that will prevent ... hacking, prevent penetration," Granholm said. "That includes monitoring, includes detection, includes addressing on the spot, includes projection about where things are going."

Blumenthal asked if Granholm had reviewed Millstone's security systems. She said she was looking forward to learning about Millstone on Friday.

"Well, we hope that you will give us the benefit of your assessment when you finish with your view because cybersecurity there and at every nuclear power plant has to be regarded with a tremendous urgency," Blumenthal said.

Granholm concluded the exchange by saying for financial and security reasons, the U.S. needs to focus on homegrown clean energy.

State Pier

After seeing Millstone, Granholm was taken on a tour of the State Pier. She along with Courtney, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Commissioner Katie Dykes, Gov. Ned Lamont, U.S. Senators Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy, and representatives from Eversource, Ă˜rsted, Kiewit Infrastructure Company, building and construction workers and other state and municipal leaders, including Mayor Michael Passero, came to the site Friday afternoon to celebrate the project's progress.

Passero pointed out that federal politicians and officials along with Lamont have taken a great interest in New London due to the State Pier project in recent years.

"It's one of our banner days when we celebrate New London being on the cutting edge of the new green economy that the Biden administration is bringing to the United States," Passero said.

Port Authority Board Chair David Kooris said the State Pier is a "terrific example" of what it takes to build a green and clean energy economy.

"We're really happy to deliver this project less than a year from now, and we can't wait to see turbines here and the ships bringing those out to the offshore farm," Kooris said.

Eversource President Joe Nolan said the State Pier "will be the epicenter of wind development in the whole northeast."

"There's no other place that this vessel can land other than Norfolk, Virginia, that's how large this vessel is," Nolan said.

Ă˜rsted Head of Northeast Government Affairs David Ortiz said the company is looking forward to beginning offshore construction next year. He said its first three projects will provide enough power for a million homes in Connecticut and across the region.

Lamont praised the public-private partnership supporting the State Pier remake.

"In the next four years, 92% of our electric grid is going to be carbon-free," Lamont said. "I want to be a leader in this country right now. Wind power along with nuclear power, what that means in terms of a carbon-free grid; it makes a big difference."

Lamont and others also praised the project for its provisions of hundreds of jobs. Granholm, Blumenthal and Courtney celebrated the fact that they are union jobs.

"I particularly want to thank the men and women who are out there every day, our laborers, our teamsters, the unions are making it happen again," Blumenthal said. "Organized labor is coming through here."

"To my colleagues in the United States Senate, if you want to see the future of energy in this country, come here, come to New London, come to the State Pier. This is the future of energy in the United States of America," Blumenthal said.

Murphy said offshore wind is "the holy grail of public policy" because it begets jobs in the short term, it accounts for economic development in the long run, "it makes the country more secure, and it helps save the planet."

"What other investment gets you all of that, all at once?" Murphy asked.

In his remarks at the State Pier news conference Friday, Courtney said that what's happening in New London is "eye-watering."

"Just the dimensions of this project, the complexity of the work, and the speed with which it's being implemented, is really just extraordinary," Courtney said. "That schedule, which we heard for next year, I think is on track and it's going to stay on track to make sure that we execute the plan exactly as it was initially envisioned."

Granholm said she was asked to come to Connecticut by the White House "because y'all have been doing amazing things here in Connecticut."

"The President has this goal of getting to 100% clean electricity by 2035," Granholm said. "The reason why the President was fascinated by what you are doing is because we want to replicate this."

Costs for the State Pier project have spiraled since the original estimation of $93 million, coming to a new projection of $235 million. The project has also been facing allegations of corruption in recent years, including a federal investigation into the spending and related contracts.

The state Contracting Standards Board, a watchdog agency that had its funding politicized, but ultimately provided, during a budget battle this past legislative session, recently completed an investigation into the Connecticut Port Authority, which criticized past practices of the Authority.

A federal grand jury has issued a subpoena for documents related to Konstantinos "Kosta" Diamantis, the former deputy director of Office of Policy and Management, who was assigned to oversee the Connecticut Port Authority's $235 million State Pier redevelopment project and also led the state's Office of School Construction Grants and Review. Diamantis resigned after being suspended amid an ethics probe of his daughter's hiring by Chief State's Attorney Richard Colangelo Jr. and a school construction contractor.

Asked whether she was aware of the federal investigation, and if so, whether it would affect her feelings on the project, Granholm said, "The project is a great project. I don't know about the local issues. This is a great project though."


Stamford to consider rezoning Mill River Park, train station area. Here’s what you need to know.

VerĂ³nica Del Valle

STAMFORD — City officials Monday will weigh a comprehensive rezoning plan that could mean more housing in the South End and change Mill River Park’s zoning to keep it a park forever.

To do that, the Stamford Land Use Bureau will pitch plans to the Zoning Board that tweak the development rights for properties along the Mill River Corridor and near the Stamford Transportation Center.

Before the plan goes to the Zoning Board, here's what you need to know.

Mill River Park

City Land Use Bureau Chief Ralph Blessing has held two community outreach sessions about rezoning part of Mill River Park from residential and light commercial uses to parkland.

The Land Use Bureau called the rezonings mostly "an academic discussion" since much of the area is already used as a park. Changing the zoning, Blessing claims, would protect the city’s land along Mill River in perpetuity by requiring that it only be used for recreational purposes.

The vast majority of rezoned land belongs to Mill River Park and has been parkland for years, but the area also includes some properties along Main Street. Most are owned by the Stamford Housing Authority, including the subsidized housing complexes Stamford Manor and Augustus Manor.

The rezoning area starts just south of West Broad Street and snakes down Greenwich Avenue, below Interstate 95 to Pulaski Street. About half a mile of the planned change recharacterizes the former semi-commercial and residential areas along the road as pure park territory, in keeping with the city's 2015 Master Plan.

Though housing once lined that corridor, much of it was "substandard" and full of "mold and lead paint," according to Blessing. It also fell within the floodplain boundaries, "and a very good use for a floodplain is actually a park," he said. Green space helps absorb floodwater along waterfronts, creating a safety net for the community, according to the Naturally Resilient Communities project.

Blessing told residents during a community outreach session Wednesday that "nothing will change here" because the buildings are housing authority property.

The only exception to the less dense land use change is one tract on the Main Street strip, Blessing said. The city owns a parcel at the corner of Main and Clinton Avenue that, until 2019, belonged to financial giant RBS. The lot now houses a Midas auto body shop.

"If the city ever decides to sell that site, we want to make sure that there is zoning in place that regulates what can be built," Blessing said.

The change would increase the amount of housing that can be built on the land.

Under the proposed rezoning, an owner could hypothetically build up to 108 units per acre of land. Future developers of the Midas property, which is slightly less than half an acre, could put about 41 apartments on the property — not counting any development bonuses they may receive, Blessing said.

Stamford Transportation Center

The Land Use Bureau coupled zoning changes to the Mill River corridor with a reimagining three plots near the Stamford Transportation Center, which is slated to get a face lift from the state. The state Department of Transportation is in the process of putting together a master plan for the surrounding area and is also building an $81.7 million parking garage adjacent to the train station.

Most of the area near the transportation center is zoned for heavy manufacturing uses that reflect a bygone era of Stamford, according to Blessing. Warehouses once lined the road, though they have steadily disappeared over the years. In heavy industrial districts, no residential uses are allowed and commercial uses are minimal.

Under the upcoming proposal, the three areas would be recategorized under two zones: one intended to encourage development near the train station, the other more geared toward high-density multifamily housing.

"The idea, obviously, is that you want to have your highest densities next to the train station so you're reducing car traffic," Blessing said.

The transportation center rezoning follows significant investment from landowners, the city and the state. For one, the Department of Economic and Community Development in January gave dominant Stamford developer Building and Land Technology a $1 million grant to remediate and rehabilitate the old Blickensderfer factory in the area.

Though the Land Use Bureau will rezone the northernmost land from Washington Boulevard to Canal Street, the city expects development to happen at three properties — including the Blickensderfer building — within that half-mile stretch. Under the updated zoning, they expect the three developments to produce about 1,300 apartments.

A 2018 study of the South End, its resources and future development previously modeled 2,040 units on those properties.

Zoning Board members are already weighing development at another of the three parcels; a developer in April pitched a high-rise at 441 Canal St., which would replace an antiques warehouse demolished in 2021.


State expected to approve funding to fix dams in Ledyard

Joe Wojtas  

Ledyard — The state Bonding Commission is expected on Thursday to approve $3 million in state funding for projects here including money to repair three Colonial-era dams on Long Pond and Bush Pond.

Then town got the news late last week when state Sen. Cathy Osten, D-Sprague, and Mayor Fred Allyn III said the Bond Commission is expected to approve money for bridge and dam upgrades, including upgrading pump stations, adding a storage tank and extending an emergency connection in Ledyard. 

The conservation group Lantern Hill Valley Association and the McKee Farm Trust have been working to get funding for the estimated $1 million needed to repair the three dams they own. The organizations did not have the money to do the work.

"I'm thrilled. It's been 10 long years that we've been pushing at this," LHVA member Betsy Graham said Sunday. "This benefits the whole region."

Graham pointed out LHVA has been maintaining, inspecting and paying taxes on the dams for 50 years.

"Senator Osten recogized that and the value they provide to the region," she said.

Graham said the funding will ensure the dams, bridges and adjacent roads will remain intact during major storms to come.

"It's a big relief that future generations will not have to worry about these things," she said.

Last month David Keehn, the president of the LHVA, said repairing the dam is important from safety, recreational and environmental perspectives. He added if the dams failed, the water could endanger downstream properties.

LHVA also is working with the environmental group Save the Sound to install a fishway through the Long Pond Dam that will connect Whitford Brook into Long Pond. This will allow anadromous fish, such as river herring, which spend their lives in both saltwater and fresh water, to return to the pond for the first time in 350 years to lay their eggs.

Graham said the plan is to coordinate the design and construction of the dams and fishway. 

In announcing the likely funding, Osten said, "Sometimes you get state bonding for a project that seems simple on its face, like repairing some dams and bridges, but which really has other, greater consequences, and I think that's the case here."

"Long Pond and the Whitford Brook are connected to the Mystic River and Long Island Sound, and so they're connected to all of the fish that live in the Sound. It would be great if, along with protecting the integrity of some old dams and the private property downstream, we could give a boost to fish who historically have spawned in Ledyard's freshwater ponds. My expectation is that's what these state funds will ultimately help accomplish," she said.

Ledyard Mayor Allyn added he appreciated Osten supporting "this critical infrastructure investment in Ledyard."

"These are exactly the types of long-term investments that state bonding should be paying for," he said. "I truly appreciate all the work she has done for us here in eastern Connecticut."


East Hartford eyes Silver Lane acquisitions to redevelop dingy commercial corridor

Michael Puffer

East Hartford is gearing up for a multimillion-dollar effort to revitalize its dingy Silver Lane corridor by acquiring multiple large, dated and underperforming buildings for redevelopment.

City officials are moving to adopt a strategic plan, developed under a $50,000 contract by East Hartford-based real estate advisors Gorman + York.

The plan – which will be the subject of a public forum next Wednesday – seeks to stop the decline of the Silver Lane corridor

“The plan gives us the proper tools to prioritize and explain the town’s priorities for development and blight removal,” Eileen Buckheit, East Hartford director of development, wrote in response to questions from the Hartford Business Journal.

The plan looks at largely commercial and industrial properties on either side of Silver Lane, from the Charter Oak Mall west to a series of small plazas by the commuter on ramp to Interstate 84. 

The aim is to capitalize on recently announced plans by Boston-based National Development to redevelop a 300-acre portion of the former Rentschler Field. That plan aims to add two warehouse buildings totaling 2.5 million square feet, as well as two more buildings of roughly 100,000 square feet for high-tech manufacturing and research.

East Hartford’s new strategic plan aims to avoid displacing area residents, but prioritizes several properties for acquisition and redevelopment, including, in order:

Silver Lane Plaza – 808-850 Silver Lane

Nursing Home – 51 Applegate Lane

Charter Oak Mall and associated ring road – 934-940 Silver Lane

Futtner Farm – 711 Silver Lane

Pratt & Whitney fields

755 Silver Lane

707 Silver Lane (UTC)

Five properties in 2018 Revitalization Plan

In addition to acquiring key pieces of property, Gorman + York suggests East Hartford adopt a special zoning district for the Silver Lane area that provides a swift and predictable land-use approval process, along with more flexibility for highest-yield designs. Gorman + York’s plan also calls for reducing the retail square footage of the area through demolition of obsolete buildings.

Today, it is not that Silver Lane is overbuilt,” reads a portion of the Gorman + York report. “It is that Silver Lane is under-demolished. There is too much older, nearly functionally obsolescent retail space in the corridor that can no longer compete — can no longer attract investment.”

The plan also calls for East Hartford to invest in sidewalks, roads and other infrastructure, demonstrating to investors the town’s commitment to Silver Lane’s resurgence.  

The town has access to funding for a grand effort. Connecticut lawmakers have allocated $60 million to East Hartford redevelopment in recent years, according to Michael Freimuth, executive director of the Capital Region Development Authority. The money would flow through his agency, which has so far pledged to use $9 million for Silver Lane redevelopment.

East Hartford is already pursuing the broad strategy recommended in the new plan. The town purchased the closed Showcase Cinema site on Silver Lane in 2019, then demolished the structure. It has entered into a purchase-and-sale agreement with New Britain-based Jasko Development and Zelman Real Estate of West Hartford.

The investors plan to build up to 420 apartment units on the Showcase site, Buckheit told CRDA board members Thursday. Land-use approvals are expected in August, allowing for a sale to be finalized in the final quarter of the year, she said.

Buckheit said a similar approval and purchase timetable is expected for the National Development’s efforts at Rentschler Field.

“We are trying to change the image of the corridor,” Buckheit said. “We are trying to change the image of this entire area.”

The plan laid out by Gorman + York must undergo review by East Hartford’s Planning and Zoning Commission, before going to the Town Council for adoption, Buckheit told the CRDA board. She hopes to see the process completed by summer, then tackle sites one-by-one.