May 29, 2020

CT Construction Digest Friday May 29, 2020

Construction coming along to Bristol Hospital's Emergency Center
JUSTIN MUSZYNSKI
BRISTOL - Construction on Bristol Hospital’s Emergency Center is coming along, and the hope is to have the entrance, which has been temporarily relocated, back closer to the area where it used to be by mid-summer.
“The intention is to have the entrance back up here,” said Thomas Roche, director of facilities and construction, wearing a hard hat and standing at the end of Newell Road - which is now owned by the hospital.
The hospital in March relocated the Emergency Center entrance, which formerly sat at the end of Newell, to the Cancer Care Center door - which sits closer to the building’s main entrance in the front of the campus. By July or August, the entrance should be back on Newell Road, which will no longer be a one-way road and will now circle in a U-shape off of and back onto Goodwin Street.
Construction broke ground in February and has for the most part remained on schedule. Roche said some supplies have been hard to come by because the coronavirus pandemic has shut down some factories.
“It slowed us down a little bit,” he said, adding that the project is still on pace to meet its deadline.
The renovations to the existing Emergency Center and a 12,500-square-foot addition are part of a four-phase, $15 million project. By late summer, the steel of the addition, which will sit off of Newell Road, should begin being put into place.
Roche said the plan is to have staff move into the addition once it’s complete, while the existing Emergency Center space undergoes renovations.
“They’re the ones who will be putting up with the inconvenience,” Roche said of the doctors and nurses of the Emergency Center. He added that, working in the emergency room can inherently be tumultuous, so the staff is “used to chaos.”
The first phase of the project was completed last year, when the hospital unveiled its new 10-bed Emergency Center Behavioral Health Unit. The 2,700-square-foot unit is designed to meet the mental health and substance abuse needs of the community in light of the nation’s opioid epidemic.
The entire project, which is currently in phase two, is slated to be completed by 2021 in alignment with the hospital’s 100 year anniversary.

Hartford inks lease deal for $21.5M Albany Ave., Woodland St. development
Joe Cooper
artford's city council has agreed to lease city property to a local developer proposing to build a $21.5-million mixed-use development in a key corner of the Upper Albany neighborhood.
The city council on Tuesday approved a 50-year deal for 7 Summits Realty LLC to lease the vacant city-owned land at the corner of Albany Avenue and Woodland Street for the development of 50 apartment units and office and retail space.
7 Summits CEO Rohan Freeman in an interview said the deal gives his group control of the 2-acre property, and leverage to finalize more than $10 million worth of “soft commitments” from several potential public and private funders.
Freeman said potential funders include the quasi-public Capital Region Development Authority (CRDA); the city of Hartford; Trinity Health of New England; and the Local Initiatives Support Corp. (LISC), among others.
7 Summits, the lone bidder to redevelop the property, formerly home to a gas station, still needs the planning and zoning commission to approve its site plan before it moves closer to breaking ground on the four-story, 80,000-square-foot development it hopes to complete in 2021.
The timing of possible city approvals, Freeman said, will determine whether the eight-month construction project begins this fall or next spring.
According to plans, which Freeman presented to CRDA’s board earlier this year, the top two floors of the so-called Albany and Woodland Place would include a mix of 50 studio and one-bedroom apartments, and the second floor is likely to house one office tenant in about 20,000 square feet.
The majority of the street-level space would be used for retail, office or restaurant space. Freeman said he is vetting a handful of potential banking, restaurant and healthcare tenants, but declined to disclose any suitors. Tenants would have access to 122 parking spaces behind the building and another 30 spaces across the street.
The Albany Avenue and Woodland Street area is currently home to performing arts institutions The Hartt School, The Artists Collective, and a branch of the public library.
He said residents have expressed interest in bringing a much-needed financial institution or  small business restaurant to the property.
“I think this is something that is long due to happen in this community,” he said. “We hope this project becomes a catalyst to spur other large-scale private development in the upper Albany and North End community as a whole.”

Windsor grants key approvals for proposed Amazon distribution facility
Joe Cooper
An Indiana developer proposing to build Amazon’s second warehouse/distribution center in Windsor has received all local land use approvals for the $50-million project.
Windsor’s planning and zoning commission on Tuesday approved a special use application and site plan for Scannell Properties to build a 823,000-square-foot distribution hub on former tobacco farmland at 1201 Kennedy Road and 1 Joseph Lane.
The approvals are contingent on a handful of conditions, including that a continuous crosswalk to the distribution facility be installed at River Street and Kennedy Road, and that additional sound barriers are implemented, among other caveats.
Last week, HBJ was first to report that e-commerce giant Amazon, which operates a massive fulfillment center on Old Iron Ore Road, is planning to open a second Windsor location where it expects to add 1,000 new jobs. Amazon, which did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday, has not confirmed or denied it intends to occupy the building.
“We will have a pre-construction meeting with the developer and their construction team before site work begins to ensure a smooth process,” said Town Planner Eric Barz, adding that Scannell has “significant site work to perform” before it begins construction.
Meantime, Amazon is seeking a multi-year tax abatement for the development, where it plans to invest at least $200 million to build out the facility on land owned by the Thrall family farm (O.J. Thrall Inc.). Windsor’s economic development commission has recommended that the town council approve the seven-year, 100% tax abatement that would save the company an estimated $4 million to $5 million annually upon completion of the project.
The town council is expected to discuss the proposed abatement at an upcoming meeting, town officials say.
According to plans, the five-story e-commerce storage and distribution facility would feature 63 loading docks, 1,800 car parking spaces, 16 motorcycle spaces and 206 trailer parking stalls.
Town records show Amazon is hoping to begin construction on the facility in the third quarter of 2020 before it starts occupying the new space in the third quarter of 2021.
If approved, Amazon would work closely with the town to employ "as many people from the community as possible once the proposed facility is operational,” according to the proposed abatement.

MIRA: Trash-To-Energy Plant No Longer Viable Without State Help

HARTFORD, CT – The Materials Innovation and Recycling Authority’s board of directors voted Thursday to begin shutting down the last publicly owned trash-to-energy plant in Connecticut.
The facility in Hartford’s South Meadows neighborhood accepts trash from 51 member towns and many private haulers, but the equipment is outdated and the municipalities can’t afford to pay for improvements alone.
Towns that contract with the Materials Innovation and Recycling Authority (MIRA) for trash removal and recycling are currently paying about $83 per ton, and that is projected to go up to about $91 in the next fiscal year.
Over the past two years, MIRA officials have been trying to combine state bonding, a new power-purchase agreement for the energy generated by the plant, and renewable energy credits to keep the cost of disposal to about $95 per ton after the plant is renovated.
But without those three additional revenue sources, towns will have to pay $145 per ton for their waste disposal – a 42% increase over the current rate. That was unacceptable to municipalities.
“I’m disappointed that if we’re going to have a quasi-public presence in the state, in this line of business, it needs support and it needs some state support,” said Manchester Town Manager Scott Shanley, who also served on the MIRA board.
East Granby First Selectman and MIRA board member Jim Hayden said he thinks it’s a “tragedy” that the state is no longer going to be “self-sufficient” in trash.
Pat Widlitz, a MIRA board member and former lawmaker, said she did not get on the board to help begin “shipping our waste out of state and just toss out 40 years of our success in managing our own waste.”
Widlitz said “MIRA is a public-private partnership and we’re missing the public right now.”
Most board members were disappointed in the state’s decision not to help provide financing to continue operations.
“Every environmentalist should be shocked and appalled that we are going to revert to landfilling,” MIRA Vice Chairman Richard Barlow said. “And not only landfilling, but landfilling in other states.”
MIRA has been working on a plan to modernize its operations for more than two years with a European developer chosen by the state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. The board voted Thursday to allow that contract to expire since it was unable to get any of its members to agree to a proposal that would cost them $145 per ton for the next 30 years.
“MIRA has concluded that the Project is not viable,” it wrote in the resolution approved by the board Thursday.
DEEP Commissioner Katie Dykes was disappointed by the decision.
“It is unfortunate that MIRA was not able to come to terms with an innovative partner to update and revitalize the Hartford Resource Recovery Facility,” Dykes said in a statement. “MIRA has the responsibility to provide reliable service to more than 50 Connecticut municipalities for several years to come, and we look forward to hearing from MIRA its plans to continue to provide reliable service in a manner that is consistent with the state’s waste hierarchy.”
Thomas Kirk, executive director of the agency, said the contract ending means that they will have to start trucking trash to Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and New York by 2023. That’s because without state support it’s no longer viable to operate the plant.
“Hauling waste out of state is a big giant step backward,” Kirk said.
He said they tried to warn state lawmakers that they would close the plant if they didn’t get either $330 million in general obligation bonds or a power-purchase agreement like the one created for the Millstone Power Station a few years ago.
Kirk said there are no viable, less costly solutions because the technology is not there yet.
“Forty years ago Connecticut made the right decision to stop burying our garbage,” Kirk said. “Now we’re going to bury it in another state.”
Kirk said he hopes that over the next couple of months they can come up with a financial alternative, but the prospect of keeping the trash-to-energy plant open is not looking good.

New toll hike, $24B construction plan approved by Turnpike board despite calls to delay
Larry Higgs
New Jersey Turnpike Authority commissioners did what drivers expected them to do on Wednesday, voting to increase tolls and approve a $24 billion construction plan, which the hike will fund.
Despite calls from drivers and a leading state senator to delay action during a telephone public hearing, the board voted 7 to 0 to approve the toll increase and the $24 billion capital plan that included $16 billion to widen sections of the Turnpike and Garden State Parkway, permanently implement cashless toll payment and to replace a bridge between New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
Tolls will increase Sept. 13 on the state’s two largest toll roads. Under a proposal released in March, the Turnpike Authority would increase the average Turnpike toll for passenger vehicles by $1.30 average toll on the turnpike. The cash toll at a Garden State Parkway mainline toll plaza would rise from $1.50 to $1.90.
State Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg, D-Bergen, specifically asked the board to “hit the pause button” on the highway widening part of the plan.
“No one said tolls shouldn’t be used to maintain roads and bridges. The only issue is the road widening,” she said. “We should take a pause to see what happens with travel patterns in post COVID-19 era.”
The scope of the proposed 16 highway widenings were the most controversial part of the construction plan, particular proposals to add lanes through heavily populated urban areas in Elizabeth, Irvington, Jersey City and Newark.
Weinberg also called holding the hearing “ill-timed to be doing this in the middle of a crisis when people’s attention is on health care.”
Comments during an online forum Wednesday seesawed from support from construction and labor groups to opposition by environmentalists and a few unaffiliated drivers. Several people asked the board to delay the vote until after the coronavirus pandemic had ended.
“People have been out-of-work since begin of March. I’m a single mom and I don’t have any other income,” said Margaret Dougherty, another driver. “I think it is pretty slippery to move something through right now. You’re not giving us a fair chance. Postpone the vote.”
Environmentalists called on Gov. Phil Murphy to veto the toll and capital plan because they contend it is counter to his energy master plan and executive order 100, which seeks to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gases. During his Wednesday afternoon press briefing, Murphy said he supports the plan.
Some suggested the money be spent on fix-it-first highway and bridge projects and mass transit projects, which will also create jobs.
Other drivers said they support the infrastructure work that a toll increase will fund.
“I know what it is like to sit in a bus or car in congestion - this plan will add lane miles,” said Elitia Dupree, who said she’s driven the Turnpike since 1970. “I want a safer turnpike and it is important to invest.”
Chris Carter, who said he is “frequent” toll road driver, supported the capital plan because 40% of toll dollars is expected to come from out-of-state drivers that will pay for significant part of highway improvement.
A representative of bus carriers said the toll plan eliminates commuter bus discounts on the turnpike. That couples with capacity reductions on buses to allow social distancing means that cost will be spread out over fewer riders
“The toll increase will be spread over fewer riders, there has already been toll increases at the Hudson River,” said Carol Katz, representing the Bus Association of New Jersey. “It will be spread over fewer riders and will be a double hit on the Turnpike and the Hudson River crossing.”
The plan also had supporters in labor and construction groups, that said toll and construction plans on the Turnpike and Parkway and the Atlantic City Expressway would help the state’s economy recover from COVID-19.
The Utility and Transportation Contractors Association cited a study that said the nearly $25 billion capital plan for the three toll roads would support roughly 18,856 jobs annually, create $38 billion in economic activity for state businesses, including non-construction related businesses.
The capital plans also would boost sagging state tax revenues from $1.9 billion in 2020 to $2.4 billion in 2030, according to the study.
Yet the pandemic still loomed larger to some.
“This pandemic has slammed my family. The middle class can’t afford this toll increase,” said an anonymous woman from Burlington County. “We are asking please, please, please postpone it.”

May 28, 2020

CT Construction Digest Thursday May 28, 2020

Possible traffic delays: Niantic River Drawbridge repairs to take place during daytime hours
Mary Biekert            
As repairs continue on the Niantic River Drawbridge, the Department of Transportation announced Wednesday that the work would be done during daytime hours and drivers should expect delays in the area.
DOT originally had planned to conduct the repairs at night after Memorial Day. Brent Church, the DOT project engineer overseeing the work, said by phone Wednesday that the department changed its plans because there is less traffic than is typical this time of year and to boost productivity.
“We are trying to capture a lot of time here that we lost because we got started really late" this spring due to scheduling issues caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, Church said. He added that as crews finished repairs to a pedestrian stairwell on the Waterford side of the bridge last week, he and inspectors monitored traffic counts to see if work could be switched to daytime hours, allowing crews to work at a faster rate in an effort to finish major bridge repairs by the end of fall, as originally planned.
“I’m trying to get as much work as I can in the days, because working in the day is much more productive than nights,” he said.
Daytime work on the bridge will be conducted between 6 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. But should traffic pick up considerably, Church said work will be switched back to nights, or crews may work a four-day week, Monday through Thursday.Signs have been posted alerting drivers to expect delays, and police officers from both Waterford and East Lyme are working to coordinate traffic stops and backups.
The $13.9 million project consists of replacing the 27-year-old span’s structural steel, deck joints and electrical and mechanical systems, along with repainting and repairs to the bridge deck and control house. The state has hired Middlesex Corp. of Littleton, Mass., to do the work.
The first and current phase of the project consists of removing and replacing existing joints on the bridge’s deck, as well as reconstructing the deck ends. Construction will move from the Waterford side to the East Lyme side and will alternate repairing the two lanes as work progresses westward. Bridge repaving will begin around late July, while repainting will take place below the bridge throughout the summer.
An email account specific to the project, DOT.info.nianticriverbridge@ct.gov, has been set up to allow residents to submit comments or ask questions.

Raising Coast Guard Museum funds is priority, not parking
The Day Editorial Board
Trying to find funding sources because of an anticipated need for more parking should be viewed as a good challenge to have. So, if New London has to come up with more parking it means construction of the National Coast Guard Museum on the city’s waterfront is imminent. And that would mean adequate funding had been raised, which so far has been a struggle.
Given all that, the city’s planned application for $24.8 million in federal aid to expand the Water Street garage by 400 spaces appears premature, not to mention pie-in-the-sky and extravagant. Do the math and it amounts to $62,000 per space.
According to WGI, a national design and professional services firm consulting on construction of public infrastructure and real estate development, the median construction cost for a new parking structure is $21,500 per space. According to the company, which has offices throughout the United States, New York City tops out at $28,400 per space.
Well, except for New London, it appears.
Assuring all necessary parking is directly across from the museum is not critical. Arguably, it may not even be preferable. One reason the editorial board has consistently supported the planned museum site on the water, behind the historic train station, is the increased pedestrian activity it would create for the downtown. That would not be the case if the museum was built over at Fort Trumbull, as many advocate.
If some folks end up parking in other spots around the commercial district because the parking garage cannot accommodate them, there would be benefits. People would filter through the downtown, past the shops and restaurants that can emerge if New London gets it act together and benefits from the increased housing, the State Pier windfarm-hub development and, yes, the museum.
Things should be busier for the museum in the summer and autumn, when walking is more welcomed.
And isn’t another reason for building the museum right next to a train, bus and ferry transportation hub to encourage visitors to use mass transit? Make a day of it, get a bite, take a stroll, then take your preferred mass transit home.
The National Coast Guard Museum Association announced in January that it had raised more than $56 million for the museum, but more than half is government commitments and it amounts to half the money needed. Focus on the fundraising. The parking shouldn’t be an insurmountable problem.

Southington’s Cava Restaurant buys adjoining property ahead of $7M expansion
Joe Cooper
In a time of uncertainty for many small businesses, Southington’s upscale Cava Restaurant is plotting a major $7-million expansion to add ballroom, dining, parking and rooftop bar space.
The family-run business, which rebooted outdoor dining service May 20 amid the state’s phased economic reopening, recently invested more than $500,000 to acquire an adjoining 2-acre property on West Street to make room for an additional 200 parking spaces and a 6,000-square-foot addition to its main restaurant, Cava General Manager Tony Papahristou told HBJ in an interview.
As part of the deal, Cava is seeding a nearby overflow parking lot with 100 spaces back to the neighboring property owner. The 300-seat Italian restaurant is not making changes to its existing 56-space parking area at 1615 West St., said Papahristou, son of owners Stavros and Eleni.
Papahristou estimated the new parking area, equipped with several Tesla charging stations, will cost at least $1 million to build. Construction on the parking lot is scheduled to begin in the next month or so, he said.
According to plans, the new structure will feature a large foyer welcoming guests to a 200-seat ballroom and other dining and rooftop bar space featuring another 75 seats. Cava’s kitchen will also be expanded by 1,000 square feet and an elevator will be installed for guest use.
A groundbreaking date for that part of the expansion is still in limbo as the restaurant must obtain certain town approvals and building permits to move forward with construction, Papahristou said. But he estimated the additional seating areas could be ready for use by 2022 if construction begins in the next year.
The expansion comes a dozen years after Cava, known for its Italian-influenced menu and annual Christmas light show, debuted with sweeping views of West Street and Mount Southington. Three years ago, the business also rolled out a new sleek white rooftop bar.
The restaurant, Papahristou said, has been busy since it reopened outdoor dining service last week when Connecticut started the process of reopening its economy amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
Cava plans to use the tent until at least June 20, the date Connecticut is tentatively scheduled to begin its second phase of reopening.
“Business has been really good since we reopened May 20,” Papahristou said. “We had a lot of regulars come back and the weekdays eventually picked up and now almost everyday is busy.”

CT homebuilding permits down 65% in April
Joe Cooper
New housing construction in Connecticut plummeted to a three-year low in April during what was the first full month of COVID-19-related shutdowns, new data shows.
There were 212 single- and multifamily permits issued last month in 104 towns and cities, down roughly 65.4% from 613 permits issued in April 2019, according to the state Department of Economic and Community Development (DECD), citing U.S. Census Bureau data.
That represents a three-year low for housing permits issued in the month of April, and the lowest overall number of permits since Jan. 2019, when 197 permits were approved, data shows.
Prior to April's report, new housing permits in Connecticut had increased year-over-year for eight consecutive months.

Among communities sampled in April, the most permits were issued in New Haven (44 permits issued), Danbury (13), Newton and Woodbury (12), and West Hartford (6).
For the year, there have been 1,368 housing permits issued, down 9.5% from 1,512 issued at this time in 2019. New Haven has had the largest number of permits issued with 381.
The housing permit report surfaced a week after the Greater Hartford Association of Realtors said that home and condo sales in the area slowed in April as prospective sellers were likely reluctant to list their homes as cases of COVID-19 mounted nationwide. The good news, however, is that median prices for homes and condos continue to rise across the Hartford area.

May 27, 2020

CT Construction Digest Wednesday May 27, 2020

Lyme-Old Lyme $2.28 million school turf field moves forward
Mary Biekert
Old Lyme — After receiving unanimous approval from the town’s Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission on Tuesday evening, it appears a proposed $2.28 million synthetic turf field project the Region 18 Board of Education is considering building is moving forward.
The 143,000-square-foot, all-weather, multipurpose field, if eventually approved by the Board of Education, will be located behind the middle and high schools and will overlay an already existing practice field, accommodating soccer, lacrosse, baseball and softball games and practices, as well as physical education classes.
Currently, the district plays sports games only on its track and soccer/lacrosse fields, both of which are irrigated. But with an all-weather synthetic turf field, Superintendent Ian Neviaser said by phone Tuesday, the school’s sports teams could play and practice year-round in almost any weather condition. That would lower use of the district’s two grass sports fields, possibly minimizing irrigation demands and preserving groundwater. The practice field where the turf field is proposed to be built is not irrigated and dries out quickly, Neviaser has said.
“We are not necessarily doing this (project) as a money-saving effort,” Neviaser said. “We are doing it so we don’t have to continue to use our game fields as our practice fields and put so much time, money and effort into upkeeping our game fields. This will allow us to keep (those grass game fields) at a higher quality because they won’t be taking as much of a beating.”
The estimated $2.28 million needed to build the new turf field does not include bleachers, lighting and other stadium upgrades, a shock-pad cushion or pricier infill material options and does not include the cost to replace the field in 10 to 15 years, nor maintenance costs, estimated at between $10,000 and $20,000 a year. Presently, the district spends more than $11,000 annually to maintain the practice field that would be replaced by the turf field, and more than $73,000 annually to maintain all of its fields.
The district will need to decide which infill option it would like to have installed with the field and whether it would like to spend more on higher-quality materials instead of the less-expensive crumb rubber in the initial estimate.
The Board of Education has been discussing the possibility of installing a synthetic turf field for several years now and selected engineering and consulting firm Milone & MacBroom of Cheshire to complete engineering and design work for the field, as well as obtain regulatory approvals from the town, in October 2019 agreeing to spend $26,800 from the district’s undesignated fund to finance that work, according to meeting minutes.
In December, Milone & MacBroom engineer Kevin Fuselier presented plans for the field before the board with a proposed timeline of the project, which included plans to present the field to the public and obtain needed land-use permits from the town in 2020.
The timeline outlined that the final design would be complete by fall 2020 and construction could begin as early as summer 2021. Construction would take four months, Fuselier has said.
Neviaser said by phone Tuesday he wasn’t sure if the school district also would need to go before the town’s Zoning Commission for further approval, he stressed that the Board of Education still has not formally decided it will follow through on the project but has agreed to move forward with the regulatory and design process in the meantime.
The board had scheduled a presentation of the field to the public in late March, but after schools closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the presentation had been put off. Neviaser said the presentation has not yet been rescheduled but a virtual one may be held.
If the school board agrees to move forward with building the new turf field, the district does not intend to bond for the project but plans to pay for it through district savings, into which the board has funneled up to 1% of its total budget each year. Neviaser has said the savings is used to help finance larger projects, avoiding large budget increases and the need to bond.
As of June 30, 2019, the balance of that account hovered around $1.7 million. Neviaser said after savings from this year’s fiscal budget are added, the balance will be slightly more than $2 million. He has estimated the fund will have $2.5 million by the end of June 2021.
Besides the turf-field project, the district also is planning a renovation of its three elementary and middle schools in the next five years, upgrading the HVAC systems, as well as other enhancements. Neviaser said that project is estimated to cost $15 million and will be bonded.
While speaking Tuesday evening before the wetlands commission, which is reviewing the project because 29,000 to 30,000 square feet of the project is proposed to extend into the town’s 100-foot upland review area — or the 100 feet surrounding any wetland — Megan Raymond, a registered soil scientist and professional wetland scientist with Milone & MacBroom, explained the project does not pose any direct, adverse impacts to the town’s wetlands — in this case the Duck River water system. She added that possible indirect impacts will be managed both by sediment and soil erosion control measures, which include putting up hay bales and silt fencing around the site during construction, as well as long-term stormwater management measures.
A drainage system installed underneath the field's surface will collect and distribute water landing on the field to an existing detention basin south of the field that drains into nearby “forested wetlands via a 24-inch corrugated pipe,” according to a wetland delineation and impact assessment submitted to the commission as part of the application.
Most rainwater landing on the field, however, will be absorbed through a permeable stone base installed under the synthetic turf infill and then into the ground, Fuselier said at Tuesday’s meeting, “and not put a burden on this detention pond.”
He added that while ball safety netting, concrete access paths and electric utilities will be built around the field, light poles and fixtures are not part of the proposed plans.
While the commission did not raise many concerns with Fuselier and Raymond about the application, commission member Evan Griswold questioned whether rainwater warmed from landing on a hot synthetic turf surface in the summer draining from the detention basin could adversely impact the Duck River.
Fuselier said that Milone & MacBroom has completed studies and testing on heat generated by turf fields and because the field will be built on at least 8 inches of granite stone, water will lose its heat while passing through that material. With “the cloud cover from a rain event ... the cooling rain and ... the cool substructure of the turf ... we haven’t seen any issues with thermal temperatures,” he said.

CT heads to Wall Street to jump-start its construction industry

Connecticut is taking a big step toward re-energizing its construction economy, seeking nearly $1.4 billion in financing from a Wall Street that appears anxious to deal.
Treasurer Shawn T. Wooden launched an $850 million bond sale last week to bolster Connecticut’s transportation program, and this week plans to secure another $500 million in financing for various other capital projects and state initiatives.
Meanwhile, the four Wall Street credit rating agencies generally praised the state’s fiscal preparedness leading into the pandemic, though long-term fiscal challenges still loom large.
“This provides us with a year of stability and that is very important right now for the construction industry in Connecticut,” said Don Shubert, president of the Connecticut Construction Industry Association.
The state lost about 3,400 construction jobs in 2019. And while the state Department of Transportation has made work-at-home adjustments to weather the pandemic storm and keep projects moving forward, Shubert said, many other states have scaled back capital programs considerably as they’ve struggled to secure financing.
The transportation bonds will finance upgrades to the Gold Star Memorial Bridge on Interstate 95 in New London, the “Mixmaster” junction of I-84 and Route 8 in Waterbury, the interchange of I-91 and Route 15 in Wethersfield and East Hartford, and the New Haven Rail Yard master complex.
Bonding also will support replacement of the Walk Bridge in Norwalk and a portion of Connecticut’s rail fleet.
“Given the effects of the COVID-19 on our economy, maintaining our credit ratings and outlooks is an important independent assessment of Connecticut’s fiscal stability,” Wooden said. “What matters most is that maintaining our credit standing allows us to continue to access funding for strategic investments for our state at attractive interest rates, saving taxpayers’ money.”
Wooden projects the interest rate on the transportation bonds, which are being financed over 20 years, is 2.97%.
Wall Street, in general, took a positive assessment of Connecticut’s readiness to move beyond the pandemic — at least relative to that of most other states.
“Connecticut has a diverse and mature economic base anchored by a large finance sector and important manufacturing and education and health sectors,” Fitch Ratings Service wrote. “The state is the wealthiest in the U.S. as measured by per capita personal income.”
The state’s position also is strengthened by a $2.5 billion emergency budget reserve, various mechanisms in law to limit spending, “and a willingness to raise revenues” when necessary, Fitch analysts added.
“Connecticut enters the current recession in a significantly better position than in the past,” S&P Global wrote in its assessment. While the current rainy day fund equals about 13% of annual operating costs, Connecticut had enough in the bank just three years ago to cover only 1%.
Fitch, S&P and the other two ratings agencies — Moody’s Investors Service and Kroll Bond Rating Agency — each offer a 10-tier system for ranking their top, “investment grade” bonds.
Ratings agencies generally place Connecticut in the middle of their investment grade rankings, though Kroll assigned the state a AA+ mark — its second-highest grade — for its transportation bonds.
Wall Street is worried about CT’s long-term fiscal issues
Despite its great wealth, Connecticut also has significant budgetary and economic challenges and the rating agencies noted this.Connecticut struggled over the past decade with a very sluggish recovery from the last recession, and Moody’s analysts said their grade “reflects a lagging economy that is highly dependent on volatile revenue sources and recent consecutive years of population loss.”
Equally concerning to Wall Street, simply put, is that Connecticut carries a lot of debt.
With more than $58 billion in unfunded pension and retirement healthcare liabilities — problems amassed over eight decades — Connecticut owes far more in this area, per person, the nearly all other states.
And when it comes to bonded debt per capita, Connecticut also is among the national leaders.
S&P Global was particularly cautious in its outlook for the state budget’s Special Transportation Fund [STF,] which plays a crucial role in the rebuilding of Connecticut’s aging highways, bridges and rail lines.
The STF covers the payments each year on the state’s transportation bonding debt. By borrowing and spending those funds, Connecticut then qualifies for $700 million per year in federal transportation grants.
But before they offer low interest rates, Wall Street investors want to see twice as much revenue flowing into the STF as debt payments going out — for the current year and for four years into the future.
Even before the pandemic, the transportation fund was in trouble. Lamont could not convince legislators to approve tolls to bolster revenues.
Despite reaffirming Connecticut’s bond rating, S&P Global analysts were skeptical STF’s revenues would remain adequate, warning the state’s projections “may prove somewhat optimistic.”

Andrew Cuomo to meet with Trump to discuss infrastructure projects
Brett Samuels
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) will travel to Washington, D.C., on Wednesday for a meeting with President Trump to discuss economic revival efforts.
The governor said during a news conference on Tuesday that he hoped to discuss how infrastructure projects could be leveraged to kickstart the economy, which has cratered due to the coronavirus pandemic.
"You want to restart the economy, you want to reopen the economy, let’s do something creative, let’s do it fast, let’s put Americans back to work, and let’s make America better," Cuomo said. "It is common sense." You have an infrastructure that’s crumbling, you need to jumpstart the economy, you need to create jobs, do it now," he added. "And that's one of the things I'm going to talk to the president about tomorrow."
Wednesday will mark the second time Trump and Cuomo have met at the White House in the last month. Cuomo has been a staunch advocate for congressional funding for states amid the pandemic, something Trump has opposed.
But the two may find common ground on infrastructure. Trump has previously called for a $2 trillion infrastructure package as a way to boost the economy during the pandemic. The president has also praised governors who have seized on the window of limited travel to repair roads and local infrastructure.
Trump will likely meet with Cuomo on Wednesday morning. He is scheduled to fly to Florida in the afternoon to attend the SpaceX launch at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center.

May 26, 2020

CT Construction Digest May 26, 2020

Derby business eyes expansion near Greenway
Jean Falbo-Sosnovich
DERBY — The industrial land behind BJ’s Wholesale Club could be seeing some new development. George Schrade wants to expand his Water Street business, A Quick Pick Crane Co., and build a 40,000-square-foot warehouse for large vehicle storage on 14.2 acres off Division Street. Schrade bought the land from the city for approximately $375,000.
The proposal from Schrade Roosevelt LLC was presented at a virtual public hearing the Planning and Zoning Commission held May 19. Local attorney Dominick Thomas and Shelton engineer Alan Shepard, representing Schrade, spoke on behalf of the proposal. Thomas said the property already is zoned for industrial use, and is a “perfect fit” for Schrade’s contractor yard expansion, as well as the proposed warehouse that he said would provide storage for other construction businesses to use. Plus, the vacant property will go “back on the city’s tax rolls” providing some welcome revenue.
Shepard said plans call for upgrading the area between the dike and the cul-de-sac, bringing it up to grade to level the site, and prep it for the warehouse building. He said the location will provide for easy navigation of large construction vehicles to turn around.
Thomas said the proposal already has been presented to the Inland Wetlands Commission, and is awaiting a vote next month. The PZC continued its hearing until its next meeting June 16, at which Thomas said a landscaping plan for the site will be presented. Thomas said the site is rather unusual, and has many Army Corps of Engineer easements. He said an arborist is looking at what type of landscaping would be best suited for the parcel.
A few commissioners requested that the parcel be shielded as best it could from the nearby Greenway, and perhaps making the warehouse roof green in color to blend in better.
PZC Chairman Ted Estwan acknowledged the site is “tough,” and any sort of landscaping would be a welcome addition to the industrial parcel.
Carmen DiCenso, the city’s economic development liaison, said the crane company expansion and warehouse would be an ideal use for the property, which actually comprises 26 acres, of which only 14.2 acres is useable.
“We do think it’s an excellent use of the property. … It’s an industrial park, the soil is compromised and only certain vegetation will grow there, so there’s really not much else you can do there,” DiCenso said. “It’s a very narrow strip of land, and when the city put the parcel out to bid about a year ago, we only had one bidder for the full price.” The property previously housed Beard Sand and Gravel in the 1980s.

East Lyme working to allow public vote on additional $2.1 million needed for police building
Mary Biekert
East Lyme — After First Selectman Mark Nickerson said the town may not be required to hold a town meeting vote on an additional $2.1 million needed to complete the police building renovation due to the COVID-19 pandemic, he told the selectmen last week that town officials are trying to find a way for residents to provide input.
Besides having only until the end of August to sign a contract with low bidder Noble Construction, Nickerson pointed out at last Wednesday’s meeting that officers are still working in less-than-ideal conditions. He has described the cramped building on Main Street being used now as “deplorable” and on Wednesday said the roof doesn't have more than a year left.
“While I’m rushing to get this (project) done, I’m also struggling with a police force that’s in a building now and is unsafe to the health of the men and women of the police force," he said. "But I don’t want to spend taxpayer money on (fixing) that (current) building.”
He said the renovations to complete the new police building would take nine months to complete.
"It's unfortunate that with COVID going on, the economy is going to tank, everyone is hurting, I get it," Nickerson said. "I'll say this, this should have been done 15 years ago. We shouldn't be here right now. We should have never put our police in this situation."
Nickerson also explained that while he and the town attorney are trying to find a way for the public to weigh in on the additional funding, either by town vote or referendum, he is worried delaying the project until it was safe to have residents vote could be detrimental to the police force.
"We are trying to work through the governor's executive order about what's allowed and what's not allowed," he said. "I'm of the belief that we really should allow the public to weigh in on this. We want to let the public weigh in on this, but in the middle of this (pandemic), technically they can't."
The Board of Selectmen had been set last week to hear a presentation about the renovation plans  from the Public Safety Building Vision Committee and then possibly decide on whether to approve the additional $2.1 million. Nickerson said the presentation did not occur because the Vision Committee was not ready to make one.
Had the selectmen heard the committee's presentation and approved the $2.1 million allocation, the Vision Committee then would have had to get Board of Finance approval for the $2.1 million. If that occurred, the $2.1 million allocation would normally go to a town meeting vote or referendum.
Residents typically vote on allocations of more than $10,000 at a town meeting. The selectmen can schedule referendums but they are expensive, Nickerson said.
The Board of Finance agreed in early 2019 to spend $5 million to purchase and renovate the former 30,000-square-foot Honeywell office building at 277 West Main St. into a consolidated space that would host a new police facility, as well as the town’s dispatch center, fire marshal’s office and emergency operations center.
Having closed on the building in May 2019 for $2.7 million, the town’s vision committee, which consists of selectmen, Board of Finance members, Police Commission members, police Chief Mike Finkelstein and residents, was left with an approximately $2.23 million budget for renovations. Over the last eight months, it has worked with architects Silver/Petrucelli + Associates on how to renovate the building while not letting costs escalate.
After the lowest bid for the project came in at about $3 million, the Vision Committee then had to factor in a host of other costs to complete the renovations. Among these were $300,000 for a contingency account, up to $500,000 for communications equipment, about $200,000 to install an elevator cab in the building and $50,000 for a clerk of the works.
The cost to buy the building combined with the construction bid and the other renovation costs has now pushed the overall cost of the project to $7.17 million. This has left the town about $2.1 million short of what is needed to complete the project.
Finance Board Chairwoman Camille Alberti said she has heard from residents concerned they would not have a say about approving the additional funding as well as how the additional $2.1 million would affect the proposed 2020-21 budget of $76 million and its 0.17-mill tax-rate increase.
Alberti asked the Board of Selectmen last Wednesday to “suspend any and all (Public Safety Building) special appropriation requests unless, and until, there is a plan in place to conduct a safe and fair referendum.”
On Friday Alberti she said that if there is not an opportunity for the public to vote on the allocation,  the request would be “dead on arrival” when it came to the Board of Finance.
“If we pass this police building, I want people to understand what they are voting for if they vote yes and if they vote no,” she said, explaining she plans to compile a list of how much the town will pay annually for bonding interest over the next 20 years, as well as for any short-term bonding costs and future repairs that might be needed to the building. “Right now, we are going into a period where we should be pulling back on everything and not spend anything.”

Renovation plan approved for downtown Norwich buidings
Claire Bessette
Norwich — The New York group that purchased two abutting historic downtown buildings once envisioned for a heritage museum received approval this past week to create 42 apartments in the upper stories and to renovate the Main and Water street storefront spaces in what city officials hope will bring new life to lower Main Street.
The two 1860s Bulletin and Richards buildings, with rich histories in the downtown’s post-Civil War economic heyday, have been mostly vacant for decades. The buildings were rescued from decay in the 1980s and ‘90s with structural preservation grants to create the Norwich Heritage Discovery Center. But the museum project never got off the ground.
Former Norwich developer Janny Lam purchased the buildings and brought in restaurants, a salon and boutique shops to the storefronts, but she eventually lost the complex to tax foreclosure in 2018.
The Rochelle, N.Y.-based principals in New England Rose LLC purchased the two buildings at 77-91 Main St. at a tax foreclosure auction in May 2018 with plans to renovate the complex for apartments and commercial space.
Their plan to create 42 market-rate apartments — 40 studio units and two one-bedroom apartments — storage and amenities for tenants and to renovate the commercial space on Main and Water streets received unanimous approval Tuesday by the Commission on the City Plan.
Project attorney William Sweeney said the developers plan to obtain federal historic preservation tax credits to maintain the historic brick exteriors, which include ornate, unique features, and do extensive interior renovations and renovate and maintain the commercial spaces on Main and Water streets.
During the museum planning, the interiors of the two buildings were gutted, including walls that once separated the two structures. An elevator shaft was created, but no elevator was installed.
Like many other Norwich buildings, the structural quirks are many. The buildings were constructed into a steep hill, so the Water Street side is five stories tall, while the Main Street side is three stories. The buildings are now combined into one, but their floors do not line up, Sweeney said. So, when an elevator is installed, it likely will have nine stops, with doors opening on either side.
The project needed zoning variances, because downtown zoning regulations prohibit residential space from being located beneath commercial space. But the Main Street storefronts are really on the third floor. The city Zoning Board of Appeals approved a variance to allow second-floor apartments on Water Street.
Another regulation for “mixed-use” projects requires at least 50% of the building to be reserved for commercial space. But Sweeney said that would not be viable for these buildings, which have a combined 21,552 square feet of space.
“The building is so huge, you can’t do half and half and make it viable,” Sweeney said.
The complex has no parking. Downtown regulations do not require parking, but Sweeney said the developers recognize they would need to provide parking for the project to be viable. About 30 spaces in the city-owned Main Street parking garage directly across the street, and more spaces in the garage are expected to become available by 2021, when the apartments project is slated to be completed.
Other nearby free parking is available at the Norwich Transportation Center near Norwich Harbor, Sweeney said.
Sweeney said with the planning and zoning approvals in place, some interior demolition can start this summer. The only current commercial tenant is the Ice & Fire Chinese restaurant on Main Street. Sweeney said the developers hope to work with the restaurant to renovate the space. He said new commercial entities have expressed interest in other commercial spaces in the complex.
The developers already are working with Norwich Public Utilities on utilities connections for the project.
“NPU has been really great,” Sweeney said.
NPU spokesman Chris Riley said utility services are in place already for the buildings, so NPU would work with the developers on interior renovations, service upgrades if needed and any possible energy efficiency rebate or incentive programs.
“The prospect of new residential and commercial activity in downtown is great news for Norwich,” Riley said, “so NPU was very excited to meet with the developer and the city’s Planning and Neighborhood Services Department earlier this year.”
City Historian Dale Plummer said the more ornate and slightly shorter building is the Charles Richards Building, with a unique “high Victorian gothic” yellow brick façade featuring varied arches, tall, narrow decorative windows and roofline designs. The red brick former Bulletin Building is more plain but has decorative roof features and large rectangular windows.
“The exterior (restoration) work done was very good,” Plummer said, praising noted historic preservation architect Fred Biebesheimer. “Unfortunately, the interior was completely gutted.”
Richards was a merchant who made his fortune in the Pacific, Plummer said. He returned to Norwich after the Civil War and invested in real estate. He built the Main Street building, which housed the Porteous, Hislop & Mitchell Department Store, a well-known store at the time. Downtown Norwich was humming as the commercial center for the surrounding towns. Ships arriving in the harbor and the trolley helped bring more people to Norwich, Plummer said.
The Bulletin Building housed the newspaper and, in the 1880s, the Norwich post office.
“Both buildings have a very rich history,” Plummer said. “It’s great to see the buildings coming back into use. Residential use is really one of the keys to downtown revitalization.”

Developer of $100 million plan says now is the best time to build
Mary E. O’Leary
NEW HAVEN — The city has moved one step closer to approval of a lab building, zoning text amendment and land deal that will bring a $100 million investment to fruition, something the developer says will make New Haven the leader in life sciences and biotech research in Connecticut.
Carter Winstanley, who has already developed over 1 million square feet of laboratory and office space at five city locations, wants to put up a 350,000 to 550,000-square-foot building at 101 College St. on the slowly disappearing Route 34 corridor for research companies that want to expand, as well those needing incubator space.
The City Plan Commission Wednesday recommended approval to the Board of Alders for a proposed text amendment that would give a developer a height bonus, an increase in floor to area ratio from 6 to 8, in the BD3 zone if they use Green Building practices to mitigate stormwater impacts or build a public urban plaza as part of the design, or do both.
Under this model, the larger building is not by right, but can grow with a point system.
The text amendment and land disposition agreement will go to the Community Development Committee of the Board of Alders on May 27 and later to the full board. The estimated start date for construction of the lab building is August with completion by August 2022.
The BD3 zone was created specifically to encourage the city’s commercial life science and biotech section which is mainly in the area being reclaimed along Route 34 and in the Medical District.
Winstanley, as part of his project, is proposing to build an outdoor plaza and interior public walkway with space for arts programming and a mix of quiet and active social spaces.
The parcel on which Winstanley would build is owned by the state, which will convey it to New Haven, which in turn will sell it to the developer.
Aicha Woods, director of City Plan, said this was an opportunity to amplify the city’s Green building ordinances and set standards for the design of a public space associated with these buildings.
She said New Haven looked at other cities who have already picked up this concept - Privately Owned Public Spaces and customized the standards to New Haven. There are some 590 POPS in more than 380 buildings in New York City.
Adam Marchand, vice chair of the City Plan Commission, said the “intention and the method seems very smart to me.”
The Development Land Disposition Agreement includes a framework of community benefits the city is calling, “Together, We Grow.” Winstanley will contribute between $400,000 and $500,000 to support jobs access and training, as well as academic opportunities for students in this framework.
Winstanley, who has worked on projects here for more than 20 years, also addressed the virtual meeting. He said his proposal is to house the “rising stars” among New Haven startups that need more space, as well as help those starting out.
He said he has been asked over and over why get involved in a project in this time of market uncertainty.
“As we spent a lot of time sitting contemplating about the challenges our communities are facing of illness and closure, furloughs and job losses, we came to the conclusion that this may actually be the best time,” Winstanley said. He said the project can hire as many as 1,000 construction workers immediately.
He said they have been able to eliminate all above-ground parking and the 700-car garage after finding spaces in New Haven Parking Authority facilities. Instead he will invest that money into a sizable plaza. The plan also promotes bike usage and makes a commitment to “climate awareness construction.”

May 21, 2020

CT Construction Digest Thursday May 21, 2020

 
TREASURER WOODEN ANNOUNCES SUCCESSFUL 

$850 MILLION SPECIAL TAX OBLIGATION BOND SALE, SETTING NEW RECORD

 Very Positive Investor Demand as Pandemic Response Continues

Hartford, CT -- State Treasurer Shawn T. Wooden today announced the successful pricing of $850 million Special Tax Obligation (STO), Transportation Infrastructure bonds, demonstrating strong investor confidence amid the ongoing COVID-19 response and a confirmation of a stable fiscal outlook for the State.  Consistent with past practice, Treasurer Wooden gave retail investors priority during a dedicated retail order period on Monday, May 18th. Retail orders received during this one-day priority period totaled $480 million, setting a new record for the STO Bond program. “The success of our STO bond sale is important for Connecticut.  The funding will be used for transportation projects across the State and the low cost of funds achieved will save taxpayers money,” said State Treasurer Shawn T. Wooden. “Continuing to manage our limited resources prudently during a crisis is another way of demonstrating that our state continues to head in the right direction.”

Transportation infrastructure projects funded by these bonds include the following:

•     I-95 Gold Star Memorial Bridge in New London;

•     I-84 Improvement Program in Waterbury;

•     I-91/CT 15 Interchange Improvements in Wethersfield and East Hartford;

•     New Haven Rail Yard Master Complex;

•     The replacement of the Walk Bridge in Norwalk; and

•     Enhancements to the rail fleet.

Orders from both retail and institutional investors reached $7.2 billion, far exceeding the bonds offered and allowing the State to lower its borrowing costs in the final pricing.  The overall interest cost on the twenty-year bond sale is 2.97%.  "The ability to finance strategic improvements in our transportation infrastructure at such a low cost is a benefit for all of our residents and the future of our state,” said Treasurer Wooden. Prior to the sale, three rating agencies reviewed and affirmed their credit ratings and stable outlooks for the State’s STO bonds: S&P Global Ratings at “A+”, Fitch Ratings at “A+”, and Kroll Bond Ratings at “AA+”. RBC Capital Markets led the bond underwriting syndicate that sold the bonds.  The bond sale is scheduled to close on May 29, 2020.More information on the State's bonding programs is available at www.buyctbonds.com.


Torrington school board to pitch high school renovation project
LANCE REYNOLDS
TORRINGTON — The Board of Education will make another pitch to the city Thursday on why a major overhaul of Torrington High School is necessary in advancing the education of the city’s children.
The City Council will be voting on two major items that will determine whether the school board can go forward with its proposed high school renovation project. The option being put forward by the school board is for a $156.6 million project with 62.5% state reimbursement. The state’s estimated share would be $85 million and the city’s estimated share would be $71.6 million.
The board considered three options, including maintaining the building as it stands with no additions. That carried the lowest price at $112.2 million but would cost Torrington taxpayers more at $78.3 million because the state would pay a smaller share.
The first vote will be on the school board’s request to establish a building committee to develop schematic drawings and specifications for school building grants. That will help determine the second vote, which will decide if the board can submit a grant application to the state Department of Education by June 30 for the project. The board is looking at going to referendum in September.
Along with a presentation by the district’s central offices, bond counsel member Sandra Dawson and financial adviser Bill Lindsay will offer the City Council and Board of Finance legal and finance advice on the proposed renovation.
If the project is approved at referendum, the first payment of the 20-year bond would be due in 2022-2023 at $643,000 and peak in the sixth year at $6.8 million. After that, the payments trend down. The bonding on the high school would add to bonding already approved for a renovation of the city’s wastewater treatment facility and road reconstruction.
The planned renovation would move seventh- and eighth-grade students from Torrington Middle School to the high school with different entrances, wings and cafeterias separating the middle schoolers and high schoolers. The school’s auditorium and gymnasium would be shared, and middle school students who excel academically would have the opportunity to take part in some high school programs.
Advertisement
School board member Gary Eucalitto said during Wednesday’s special budget committee meeting he was frustrated that a city councilman said the district provides a “second-rate education.” Eucalitto did not say who made the comment.
“We provide just as good of an education as any other town that I ever lived in,” Eucalitto said. “We just don’t have a population that requires every student to go to college and focus on test scores. We don’t provide a second-rate education.”
The joint meeting involving the school board, Board of Finance and City Council will take place at 5 p.m. over Zoom. Public comments can be made to the city clerk’s office before 4 p.m. through email at city_clerk@torringtonct.org.

State highway agencies need a $50B federal cash infusion or construction could halt, group says
Larry Higgs
Highway agencies, which have seen either tolls or gas tax revenue plummet due to double digit drops in traffic volume due to coronavirus travel restrictions, are asking for federal aid to make up for lost money.
But national highway officials said what they need is more than what’s been proposed isn’t enough. Without it, state departments of transportation, DOTs, face tough choices including stopping construction, cutting back on maintenance and furloughing workers. officials said.
A $3 trillion coronavirus relief bill proposed on May 12, included $15 billion in funds for state departments of transportation, but that is lower than the almost $50 billion that the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) officials estimates DOTs will need.
That request was based on an estimate of what states need over the next 18 months to offset revenue losses, said Susan Howard, AASHT program director for transportation finance. Nationwide, state DOTs stand to lose $110 billion, based on prior years.
“The bill has $15 billion. It’s not as much as we hoped for, but we’re happy to have that revenue,” she said. “We see it as a first step.”
The first $2 trillion CARES act had funding for transit agencies, but not for state transportation departments or toll agencies, Howard said.
For toll agencies and state DOTs, less traffic means less revenue, either in tolls or gas tax revenues. Traffic research company Inrix estimated that traffic on New Jersey highways dropped by 62% after COVID-19 stay at home orders except for essential workers were issued in March.
An association representing 128 toll agencies in the U.S. has made a separate request to Congress for $9.2 billion in federal aid last month. That figure is tied to revenue losses projected in 2020 and the first quarter of 2021.
NJ Turnpike officials reported a $23 million loss in toll revenues caused by a 29% traffic drop in March due to COVID-19. Port Authority officials reported a 61% traffic drop at its six bridges and tunnels and have asked federal officials for $3 billion in aid to cover lost revenues that also includes airports and the PATH rail system.
For drivers, the effects could be the same without federal help, whether they drive a toll road or state highway.
Some states have begun to suspend major road and bridge construction projects, others have delayed approving contracts to start work, even though this is the peak season for construction, because of the uncertainty of revenues, Howard said. Some state transportation departments have furloughed or laid off employees, she said. Maintenance projects would have to be prioritized and some put off.
“Every state will have to look at revenue forecasts, all will see a definite loss,” Howard said. “They will have to make some tough decisions on what they can afford to do.”
New Jersey highways have seen a higher traffic reduction than the 30% to 40% drop in other states, due to COVID-19. But New Jersey is in better financial condition because current funding is based on taxes collected prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, Steven Schapiro, an New Jersey Department of Transportation spokesman said.
“There are no funding issues for state fiscal year 2020 (which started on July 1, 2019).” He said. “The full impact of the pandemic on the Transportation Trust Fund are not yet known.”
New Jersey DOT officials are watching funding needs and are working with Gov. Phil Murphy’s administration on them, Schapiro said. Murphy has until May 22 to update his revenue forecast and until Aug. 25 to present a new spending plan. Employee furloughs also would be addressed with the administration, Schapiro said.
The state’s future looks grim, based on reports of falling tax revenue collections that were down $3.5 billion when compared to last April. Statistics were not available from the state treasury department for gas tax collections which are a major DOT funding source.
State Senate President Steve Sweeney, D-Glouchester, has proposed a partial furlough of state employees as a way the state can deal with revenue shortfalls and avert layoffs. Approved by both houses of the state legislature last week, it is up to Murphy to sign or reject the bill.
AASHTO’s funding request would “fund projects for the next 12 to 18 months, so this pain won’t be felt all at once,” said Tony Dorsey, an AADHTO spokesman.
Without it, money that DOTs have “in the pipeline will dry up and projects will dry up and employee furlough more rampant,” he said. “That is the crisis we see happening.”
New Jersey DOT officials supports the AASHTO funding request and has informed members of the state congressional delegation about that, Schapiro said.
 
 

May 20, 2020

CT Construction Digest Wednesday May 20, 2020

Report recommends measures to improve safety, traffic flow along Route 66 in East Hampton
Jeff Mill
EAST HAMPTON — The Town Council will be looking at improved safety and traffic flow along the Route 66 corrider, after being presented with a series of recommendations from the Lower Connecticut River Valley Council of Government.
The proposals are included in a draft document presented by the regional planning agency for 17 towns including East Hampton.
The COG draft report also includes proposals for improving pedestrian and vehicular traffic flow on Route 66 in Portland.The long range study, if approved, would enable the COG to move ahead to seek grants and other funding sources to help improve traffic flow along the corridor, said Portland Economic Development Coordinator Mary D. Dickerson. COG Executive Director Samuel Gold was joined by Christopher Granatini, vice president of engineering firm Tighe & Bond, which conducted the corridor study.
Granatini said the study is intended to “look out to 2040,” and will “really focus on safety improvements in the corridor without making wholesale infrastructure changes.”
In his presentation to the council during its most recent meeting, Granatini outlined mostly minor adjustments.One was redesigning the intersection at Lake Drive and East High Street where the new Dollar General store is located.
A more major proposal was for realigning Old Marlborough Road where it intersects with East High Street and construction of a roundabout, or traffic circle.
Installing the roundabout would “reduce vehicle traffic speeds,” Granatini said.
The proposal also would involve heavily striping pedestrian crossings and extending sidewalks along East High Street to Paul and Sandy’s Too, Granatini said.
The area in front of the popular garden center and hardware store would see changes including installation of a median divider and construction of a left-turn lane for eastbound traffic turning into the center.
Granatini said engineers who developed the concept propose having a designated entrance and exit as well as creating a pedestrian crossing and reducing the speed limit from the present 45 mph to 30.A proposed change for the intersection of East High and West Point Road calls for creating a sidewalk on the north side of Route 66 including an ADA-compliant sidewalk where West Point Road enters Route 66.
Coming up the hill past the former town hall, the Tighe & Bond proposal calls for extending the left-turn lane into McDonald’s and installing push-buttons to control traffic signals at the entrance and exit of Stop & Shop.
At the entrance to the middle school, Route 66 would be widened and a left-turn lane created for westbound traffic entering Childs Road.
Tighe & Bond produced a drawing for a traffic circle at the intersection of routes 66 and 151, but Granatini said that idea was abandoned because it would create “too significant an impact.”
The COG proposals also include eliminating driveways at Burt Realty and the Middletown Glass building.
Gold said COG hopes to have the proposal completed by June, when it will be submitted to the state Department of Transportation for review and comment.

New London council approves $48 million portion of high school project
New London — The $108 million New London High School reconstruction project reached another milestone on Monday.
The City Council authorized construction manager Newfield + Downes to award eight trade contracts worth $48.2 million to allow preliminary site work to start later this month. The council additionally authorized spending $4.3 million for abatement and demolition work.
Work is expected to start later this year on an addition at the high school, the first stage in a multiyear construction project that will take place while students are attending school.
Both the high school and Bennie Dover Jackson Middle School are being updated as part of the $165 million project approved by voters in 2014.

East Lyme Inland Wetland Agency turns down 108-unit housing development
Mary Biekert            
East Lyme — The Inland Wetland Agency unanimously voted to deny without prejudice an application proposing to construct a 108-unit housing development on the western side of town, blocking it from moving forward until concerns about stormwater runoff are corrected and submitted in a new application to the agency.
Developer Jason Pazzaglia, owner of the custom homebuilding company Pazz & Construction LLC of East Lyme, submitted an application to the town’s Land Use Department late last year, proposing to build 108 multifamily units on about 12 of the 20 acres he owns at 90 North Bride Brook Road.
The forested and undeveloped property abuts the southern side of Interstate 95, is located about a mile away from the eastern side of the Rocky Neck Connector and sits about 500 feet west of Bride Lake, according to town Wetland Enforcement Officer and Director of Planning Gary Goeschel.
Pazzaglia presented his plans with his attorney Harry Heller of Montville in January, and again in February, before the Inland Wetland Agency when a public hearing also was held on the project.
Pazzaglia was required to go before the agency because three of the 13 proposed buildings extend into what’s known as the upland review area, or the 100-foot area surrounding a watercourse — in this case Bride Brook.
Pazzaglia had told The Day earlier this year he had hoped to begin constructing the development as soon as this spring. He purchased the property from its estate owner Edward H. Dzwilewski for $450,000 in 2017, and the Water and Sewer Commission last September granted him 35,400 gallons of daily sewage capacity for the project.
Though Pazzaglia did not officially file his application with the Inland Wetland Agency under the state’s affordable housing statutes, in January he told The Day he planned to submit the application to the town’s Zoning Commission under those statutes after receiving permission from the wetlands agency to move forward.
The Inland Wetland Agency met for the first time since February via a virtual meeting Monday night to make a decision on the application, as well as address other, separate applications.
Goeschel advised the agency that Pazzaglia's application was complete — including a report by soil scientist James Sipperly and a review by town municipal engineer Bill Scheer — and showed “nothing that would suggest there is an adverse impact to the wetlands.” However, agency members unanimously denied the application due to remaining concerns about stormwater runoff and how it may impact Bride Brook, Bride Lake and one of the town’s nearby drinking-water aquifers. Agency member Rosemary Ostfeld has said a small portion of the building site sits within an aquifer protection area.
Chief among the agency's concerns Monday were plans to divert stormwater runoff from the roofs of three of the site's 13 buildings into Bride Brook. The three buildings were proposed close to the brook, within the agency's upland review area.
Agency Vice Chairwoman Kristen Chantrell worried that potential pollutants and warmed rainwater could be carried into the brook after hitting the roofs. Combined, she argued, the warmed stormwater and pollutants could adversely impact the brook, which she said is an already impaired watercourse and therefore should be further protected.
“I think there are other alternatives instead of putting those buildings that close (to the brook) and having the purpose of those rooftops recharging the watercourse,” she said. "The rooftops will impact the watercourse and wetlands in a negative way and those buildings need to go."
Chairman Gary Upton also raised concerns about a stormwater detention basin proposed to be built at the southeastern end of the site, where the rest of of the site's stormwater runoff will filter into.
Attorney Heller outlined to the agency during public hearings in January and February that the basin could accommodate enough water for a “100-year storm,” accounts for overflow with a swale, or marshy depression, and follows design guidelines from the state’s 2004 stormwater quality manual. However, Upton worried pollutants coming from the proposed development and filtering through the basin still could impact the nearby Bride Lake and, eventually, the town's drinking-water aquifer.
“My concern is that we have a detention pond that is receiving who knows what from driveways, anti-freeze from cars, who knows what pollutants from Roundups and all those different things,” Upton said. “It’s irrefutable that if a pollutant got into that detention basin, that it has the potential ... to cause pollution of a wetland or a watercourse.”
The agency requested that a hydrology report be submitted with a new application.
Pazzaglia and Heller were present at Monday’s meeting but did not speak while the agency deliberated.
Goeschel told the agency Monday he expects Heller and Pazzaglia will appeal the decision in New London Superior Court and simultaneously would submit a new application addressing the agency's concerns.

With CT’s trash future in flux, food-waste recycler hopes for bigger role
Matt Pilon
rocessing facilities that convert food and other organic waste into energy and compost are a key piece of Connecticut’s strategy to reduce the amount of garbage it burns, but investment in those plants has fallen well short of what is needed to meet the state’s goals.
Connecticut’s only anaerobic digester, run by Quantum Biopower, opened four years ago in Southington, but not much has happened since.
Several other proposed digester projects have stalled out due to financial troubles or other challenges, and state incentives have thus far failed to attract investment in more plants.
Quantum can process about 40,000 tons a year, which is well short of the 300,000 tons of annual digester capacity state environmental officials say is needed to divert a meaningful volume of organics from the broader waste stream by 2024.
Other states are starting to see renewed interest in building anaerobic digesters, including from deep-pocketed private equity backers.
For example, Maryland-based Bioenergy DevCo is using a $106-million investment from Newlight Partners to build a 100,000-ton capacity anaerobic digester in its home state, while also proposing facilities in New York, New Jersey and Washington.
Investment in such plants is spurred by various regulatory and market dynamics, including California’s financial incentives for biomethane — also known as renewable natural gas — which can be produced by in- and out-of-state anaerobic digesters. There’s also growing demand from private companies like UPS that want the fuel for their natural gas-powered vehicle fleets. And states like Connecticut have mandates that require large food-waste producers, such as grocery stores and manufacturers, to separate their organics and ship them to composters or anaerobic digesters.“Anaerobic digestion has a bright future, but it’s more a question of timing,” said Brian Paganini, Quantum’s vice president and managing director.