August 31, 2021

CT Construction Digest Tuesday August 31, 2021

Meriden Markham Airport closed for runway resurfacing



Michael Gagne

MERIDEN — A $1.88 million project to replace Meriden Markham Airport’s aging runway and taxiway began earlier this week. 

That work will continue on the municipal airport until Oct. 21, according to a notice regarding the project.

Meanwhile, two large lighted “X” signs have been installed along both ends of the runway, indicating it is closed to departing and arriving aircraft. According to construction bid documents, other construction barriers are to be installed while the project is underway.

Constance Castillo, the airport’s manager, said the work, which is being completed by Tilcon Connecticut, Inc., began on-time — at 7 a.m. last Monday.

It had been 16 years since the 3,100-by-75-foot asphalt runway had been repaved. 

In addition to the installation of a new surface, the runway is also being regraded. The project also includes LED lighting upgrades and replacing some of the drainage along the west side of the runway. 

When the project is complete the Evansville Avenue airport will have “an entirely new runway and taxiway,” Castillo said. Stantec, an international construction design firm with offices in Connecticut, is the project’s supervisor, along with Meriden Markham officials.

The entire cost of the project is covered by a Federal Aviation Administration Airport Improvement Program grant. Typically those projects require a local match of at least 10%. That local obligation, about $188,000, has been waived for this project. 

Once the paving work is complete, the runway will be “restriped” with new reflective markings, Castillo said. 

Castillo said most of the airport’s 68 tenants have temporarily relocated to other hangars at neighboring airports. About a dozen or so tenants have stayed behind, she said. 

“The hangars are still accessible for tenants in the building,” Castillo. 

The airport’s administrative staff, including Castillo, and its engineers will remain on site while the project is underway. Meanwhile, the airport gate is closed to the public. 

Other airport improvement projects are in the pipeline over the next few years. Those projects include updates to the airport’s two main gates and the repaving of ramps and other services and the expansion of motor vehicle parking lots. 

City Councilor Sonya Jelks, the council’s representative on the Aviation Commission, described the airport as a “viable resource” for the city. She said the runway upgrades “are certainly needed.”

Officials have discussed the potential for other improvements to the airport down the line. Jelks said those discussions have included talk about recruiting food vendors and the possible addition of a restaurant at the airport. 

“The airport is one of those amenities we have that a lot of municipalities don’t have. It’s a huge asset for us,” Jelks said.

“I’m very excited that we continue to see good things happening like this in Meriden. We want to be as supportive as we can in these efforts.”


Industry Awaits Its Trillion-Dollar Infrastructure Plan

The $1.2 trillion bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act opens the federal wallet to massive road, bridge, water, utility and broadband projects for years to come. But is the construction industry as a whole prepared to solve the country's infrastructure challenges in the turmoil of longtime labor shortages, gouging materials prices and the scarcity of heavy machinery?

"The interesting thing about the construction workforce is that they're transient," David Martin, president of the Arizona Chapter of the AGC told a local radio station. "They go where there's opportunity. I have absolute confidence in the workforce system."

He's confident recent worries about labor shortages will have no impact on Arizona's ability to complete federally-funded projects. President Joe Biden will work with contractors to alleviate supply chain issues, he said.

Contractor John Walton told CNBC he believes the bill will not only bring a boom to the economy but much needed improvement to dilapidated structures nationwide.

Walton's Mobile, Ala., asphalt and highway construction company John G. Walton Construction plans to "cash in" on federal projects once funds travel down to state governments.

There's a lag, of course, between when a bill is signed into law and when federal dollars are allocated — and when local businesses like Walton's can bid on these projects.

With some 20 percent of the bill, or $110 billion, dedicated for the construction of roads and bridges, he told CNBC he's hoping for a long-term boom in business.

"If states have the money come in, they can plan those projects out," Walton said. "Sometimes it takes two or three years from design to actual construction, so that really helps contractors because they know what's coming down the pipe."

What May Be Coming

The bipartisan infrastructure bill contains $550 billion in new spending.

"The $1.2 trillion figure comes from funding normally allocated each year for highways and other infrastructure projects," wrote John Probasco for Investopedia. "Following passage, the proposed legislation was sent to the House of Representatives where further adjustments are expected. Should the bill pass, the House and Senate will need to consolidate their respective versions for a final bill to go to President Biden for his signature."

The AGC breaks the funding down, noting the package incorporates the AGC-endorsed Senate Environment and Public Works Committee passed Surface Transportation Reauthorization Act.

A $311 billion bill, it would reauthorize federal-aid road and bridge programs for five years. "This bill represents a 30 percent increase in road funding over current levels," noted AGC.

The package also includes:

an additional $110 billion of new spending on top of reauthorization for highways, roads and bridges, including $55.48 billion in additional contract authority and $55.52 billion in additional funding for a host of programs, such as the Bridge Investment Program, USDOT RAISE and INFRA grants, and Private Activity Bonds.

an extension of currently authorized federal transit policy and funding levels.

an additional $39.15 billion for transit programs on top of the extension; $19.15 billion in additional contract authority; $4.75 billion of additional funding for State of Good Repair Grants; $8 billion of additional funding for Capital Investment Grants; and $7.25 billion for other programs.

the Surface Transportation Investment Act, a $78 billion reauthorization of federal freight and passenger rail programs.

an additional $66 billion in new spending on top of the reauthorization, including $6 billion for Northeast Corridor grants; $36 billion for Federal-State Partnership Intercity Passenger Rail; $16 billion for Amtrak; $5 billion for Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvement program; and $53 billion in other related spending.

Other Relevant Funding:

Ports and Waterways: $17.3 billion

Airports: $25 billion in new spending for airport infrastructure, including $20 billion for runway, taxiway and terminal projects; and $5 billion for air traffic control infrastructure.

The $550 billion in new spending is paid for through a host of sources, according to AGC, including repurposed COVID-relief funding, refunded and fraudulently paid unemployment benefits and other extended or reinstated governmental fees.

Good News for Construction

Stephen Sandherr, CEO of the AGC, said the new infrastructure measure provides much-needed new federal investments in a wide range of infrastructure projects.

"These investments will help generate new demand for construction services, equipment and materials," he said. "More important, the new investments will create high-paying construction career opportunities and help make our economy more efficient and competitive."

ARTBA President & CEO Dave Bauer also heralded the infrastructure bill as a testimony to the strong bipartisan spirit demonstrated in the Senate, which he believes sets the bar high.

"The U.S. economy and transportation system users stand to benefit most from enactment of an infrastructure bill that combines historic investment levels with pragmatic policy reforms," said Bauer.

He added a caution, though, saying the vote is "a much-needed step but not the finish line."

Bauer said ARTBA will "continue to work with the House, Senate and the Biden administration to help achieve an outcome that addresses America's transportation infrastructure needs today and in the future."

Associated Builders and Contractors echoed much of the construction industry's positive comments.

Michael Bellaman, ABC president and CEO, said the infrastructure package contains the most significant investment in the nation's infrastructure in a generation.

It "could yield crucial wins for the American people and construction industry," said Bellaman, adding that it is promising to see progress made toward transportation modernization.

"This bipartisan accomplishment is something that has eluded Congress for decades and is proof of the possibilities when lawmakers choose compromise over conflict."

He believes "common sense" provisions in the bill will cut down on unnecessary delays in federal construction projects and help address the workforce shortage in the construction industry.

"Importantly, the bill is paid for without raising job-killing taxes on our nation's small construction businesses."

ABC has concerns about the bill's expansion of prevailing wage and support for misleading "buy American" and "local hire" requirements, which could impact the ultimate success of the legislation, said Bellaman.

Every sector mentioned in the bill's breakdown has "a significant boots-on-the-ground need" for construction in order to facilitate projects, said Ben Johnston, chief operating officer of construction lending firm Kapitus.

"One thought is the infrastructure bill encourages the procurement of supplies that will go into projects through domestic sources, domestic manufacturing and materials," he said. "While not all this work will be shovel-ready for the next year or two, the procurement of materials will start sooner than that."

That procurement head start, coupled with the repatriation of manufacturing to U.S. soil, will be a boost to the construction industry overall in a shorter timeframe that the launch of construction projects themselves, Johnston added.

"We would encourage contractors to make sure they are approved to participate in government contracts and look into ways they can participate from an eligibility approval standpoint."

Contractors should also "think deeply" about where the money is going and whether there is a business opportunity for expansion in their anticipation of work.

"I don't mean they need to go hire people today — let's not get too far ahead — but to start thinking where the market is likely to go," said Johnston. "With the dollars earmarked, contractors will want to do research now to be ready to participate when the money comes down." CEG

Just How Dire Are the Straits?

The biggest threat to President Joe Biden's vision of energizing the U.S. economy may not be its challenging path through Congress but a dire shortage of everything from workers to cement mills, points out Bloomberg News.

"Republicans and Democrats are united in their support for hundreds of billions of dollars in new spending on infrastructure in coming years. Yet, the companies that will be relied on to pave the roads, build the bridges, lay the water pipes and assemble the trains aren't yet planning to meet those needs," wrote Bloomberg. "And that's even as they face immediate shortages — from steel and cement to the supply of labor — stemming from the unprecedented difficulties of a sudden reopening of the economy after last year's shutdowns."

There's already a labor shortage in construction, "so you can't throw a trillion-dollar nuclear bomb of money into the industry," said Bassem Hamdy, CEO of Briq, a company that runs cost estimates for construction firms. "If you don't have workers, how will this ever happen?"

Construction firms are excited for more business, but aren't yet taking steps to boost hiring or move workers, Hamdy told Bloomberg.

U.S. steelmakers aren't boosting supply enough to meet expected demand. And tariffs on items including aluminum and lumber are hampering affordability.

President Biden has said his administration will combat supply pressures, starting with the construction materials and transportation bottlenecks.

But, "for all the ‘Made in America' push by both Biden and his predecessor, Donald Trump, American manufacturers are confronted with a legacy of historically mediocre growth over the past decade, and a future colored by lackluster U.S. demographic trends," wrote Bloomberg.

These factors alone discourage companies from ramping up capacity, even amid dizzying prices, the news service noted.

"Certainly, contractors are dealing with tremendous opportunity on the one hand and operational difficulties on the other," said Ben Johnston of Kapitus. "Disruption in the supply chain as a result of COVID-19 and the procurement of goods from overseas as well as domestic production backed up quite significantly."

The huge hurdle top of mind for contractors is labor shortages, and the scarcity of quality skilled labor, he added.

In the light of a continued strong housing market coupled with the additional funds the infrastructure bill lays out, some problems are likely to be exacerbated for the construction industry, he said.

"The ability to hire skilled employees is a huge issue. Given the current dynamics, I wouldn't be surprised to see wage inflation as a result," Johnston said.

"Hopefully, as the economy continues to repair itself, we'll see an increase in the overall labor pool. Some people who have chosen not to participate may come back into the market and be able to take those critical jobs."

Tom Conway, president of United Steelworkers, the largest industrial union in North America, told Bloomberg he's concerned that the supply crunch means the industry — and contractors — will have to source materials abroad, benefiting other countries with employment gains, instead of the United States.

"Here's what I think the administration has to be concerned about," Conway said. "They're going to press and press and press trying to get an infrastructure bill and all these manufacturers will say, ‘We're not ready. We need more runway to get ready. So, in the meantime, get it offshore and do the projects and we'll get started on ours.'"

The housing industry now is worried about the competition from infrastructure projects. The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) said the United States will need to lift tariffs on lumber and import more key metals to ensure there's enough aluminum for appliances, copper for wiring and cement for foundations.

Domestic U.S. saw mills haven't kept up with construction, and the housing industry imports about 30 percent of its lumber from Canada, reported Bloomberg. Lumber prices are up an estimated 400 percent since the start of the 2020 recession.

The infrastructure bill "will place a huge demand for steel and concrete that will impede our ability to build out multifamily and other types of housing," said Jerry Howard, CEO of NAHB.

"You've got to increase output. And where that's going to come from? Lord only knows. It'll be difficult to enact because of the lack of supplies, labor, everything."

The infrastructure bill increases the demand for trained workers, which the United States doesn't have enough of. The manufacturing industry remains down more than 500,000 positions from February 2020. Immigration could help, but that's politically challenging, maintained Bloomberg.

"By the time we get to infrastructure hitting the ground, there will be a labor shortage and to some extent the government is going to have to compete with private businesses for people," said Aneta Markowska, chief U.S. economist of Jefferies.

Delays in passing the infrastructure bill may end up being beneficial, Michael Gapen, chief U.S. economist of Barclays Plc, told Bloomberg. Constraints on supply chains could ease over time, he said.

"If you pass infrastructure too soon and we're trying to source all these goods, we're just going to ramp up existing frictions in markets," Gapen said. "But most people believe an infrastructure bill won't go into effect until next year."

On the flip side, Johnston of Kapitus pointed out that of all the verticals his firm finances, construction has bounced back from an application standpoint faster than any other.

"There is tremendous demand in the housing market and growth in home sales amid a scarcity of real estate. The fact that so many people have been working from home and reconsidering how they want to live their lives and what kind of home they want is leading to considerable demand for construction."

In fact, Johnston is glad to see the infrastructure bill specifically target domestic manufacturing and procurement. He believes that should drive additional manufacturing growth here and demand for domestic construction business.

All of that, said Johnston, is quite positive for the firm's client base. "We believe it's positive for the overall economy as well," he added. CEG


Lamont says funding for Anna Reynolds Schools in Newington was 'not a tough decision' during tour

Erica Drzewiecki

NEWINGTON – Deciding to fund the renovation of Anna Reynolds was “not a tough decision” Governor Ned Lamont told town officials during a visit to the elementary school on Reservoir Road Monday morning.

The state is providing over $20 million toward the $35.5 million project, approved by nearly 70% of voters in a Nov. 2020 referendum.

“We’re making an investment for the kids,” Lamont said. “I want them to know why we’re here and how important they are to us.”

State Rep. Gary Turco of the 27th House District organized the tour of Anna Reynolds for town, school and state officials, which also included Sen. Matt Lesser and State Rep. Kerry Wood.

“I can’t thank the governor enough for coming here to Newington today and supporting this renovation project, which is so important for the health and safety all of our students, teachers and staff,” Turco said.

The group visited several classrooms on their walk-through of the facility, built in 1954 as Northwest School. One of the places they visited was Mrs. Tracy Modon’s first grade class. Students were enthusiastic to have the opportunity to share what they did over the summer with the governor.

Ice cream and travelling were two of the activities mentioned.

“It’s great to be back together in person full time again,” Modon said.

Anna Reynolds parents, students and school staff led a grassroots effort over the last few years to move forward the long overdue project. Some of the building’s problems include regular flooding, a bad roof, handicapped inaccessibility and outdated plumbing, electrical and HVAC systems.

The parking lots as well as the drop-off and pickup areas will also be addressed, Principal Jason Smith told officials.

“All we endured, with leaks and worms in our hallways and the poor conditions of the school, while still providing our students a high quality education, I’m so excited to be breaking ground on a brand new building this spring and summer,” Smith said.

Construction is expected to begin in spring or summer of 2022 and be completed by late 2024.

“This project was next in line when I first started here and we’ve been guns blazing ever since,” Superintendent of Schools Dr. Maureen Brummett said.

The governor called Connecticut’s workforce the state’s greatest natural resource, adding that good citizenry all begins with the education system. Connecticut schools rank second in the nation.

“I think the state is making historic investments in education and there are a lot of really good reasons,” Lamont said. “Reason number one is those kids walking by. This last year was not a lost year of education. We are doing everything we can do for these kids. You can’t do it if you’re not in the classroom; you can’t be in the classroom unless you’re in the classroom safely and that’s what I say when I go around Anna Reynolds.”


New Britain-based construction company celebrates with Frog Hollow community after completion of new library

Ciara Hooks

HARTFORD – Downes Construction Company hosted a Book Drive Thursday in honor of the completion of the new Park Street Library @ the Lyric.

The books collected, both in English and Spanish, were given to children of all ages in the Frog Hollow community. Children, teens and adults gathered on the library’s terrace to enjoy free books and complimentary ice cream as well.

“Downes Construction is a wonderful partner. Our new Park Street Library @ the Lyric is just weeks away from opening its doors on the corner of Park and Broad,” said Bridget E. Quinn, Hartford Public Library president and CEO. “This thoughtful and generous neighborhood event exemplifies the community-driven nature of this company.”

Downes President David Patrick and several Downes employees joined in celebrating this new space for the community.

“Downes has always had a great partnership with the City of Hartford, and we’re thrilled to have the opportunity to give back to the Frog Hollow community by providing books for all ages,” said Patrick as he enjoyed a complimentary ice cream treat.

Downes Construction Company provided construction management services for the recently completed Park Street Library @ the Lyric. The new branch will provide a community resource to the retail and residential neighborhood. The new building includes a 150-seat community room, smaller meeting rooms, learning lab, a café, exhibit space and designated adult, teen and children’s areas and a protected courtyard.

Located at 200 Stanley Street in New Britain, Downes Construction Company provides a full range of construction-related services, from project planning to construction.


 On the Move: Work on Arrigoni, East Haddam swing bridges will have impact

Larry McHugh

MIDDLETOWN — Another busy week is on tap for the chamber team as we come up on Labor Day here in Middlesex County.

On the chamber calendar front, this week features the return of the chamber divisions after a brief summer hiatus. We will kick off the division year on Wednesday morning with an important meeting of the Portland and East Hampton division on Zoom.

The September meeting of the chamber’s Central Business Bureau, which covers issues of importance to the business community in downtown Middletown, will be held Thursday morning.

The Chester, Deep River and Essex Division will get together Friday for the first time since June. These meetings will feature reports from local and state officials, business leaders in each town, and other important stakeholders.

While our staff plays a key role in these meetings, I want to take a moment to thank our division chairs, and all members that support these important meetings on a monthly basis. Our grassroots divisions help us keep a close eye on the issues that directly impact or have the potential to impact our members in each of our towns.

We look forward to a productive week of meetings.

On the infrastructure front, the chamber continues to do its best to play a constructive role in the important river crossing projects happening in Middlesex County.

Bridge construction

The rehabilitation of Arrigoni Bridge approach spans and operational improvements at St. John’s Square / Main Street intersection in Middletown and Portland are moving right along and expected to wrap up in the early part of 2022.

The work group that we established in 2020 has been meeting regularly, and has done a great job of ensuring access to the bridge for emergency management and other critical vehicles, all while doing its best to minimize the economic impact of the construction on local businesses.

This committee features municipal and state leaders from both sides of the bridge, district and project leaders from the state Department of Transportation, project manager from the contractor, Mohawk Northeast, first responders from both sides, Middlesex Health, and of course, businesspeople of all stripes.

After the project on the Arrigoni wraps up, our attention will turn toward the East Haddam Swing Bridge Rehabilitation Project, scheduled to begin in the spring. There is no way around the fact that this project will have a major impact on the towns of Haddam and East Haddam, and the whole central part of Middlesex County over the course of three construction seasons.

The bridge needs to be closed for significant stretches in order for the work to get done. The chamber hosted a special meeting of our East Haddam and Haddam Division Thursday, which featured a presentation from DOT on the current plan for the project and over 50 of our member businesses.

The chamber will be launching a new committee that will work to minimize the impact of this project as well, using the Arrigoni Bridge work group as a model. We look forward to playing an important role throughout this project, and I would like to thank DOT, our elected leaders, and everyone who is working together to manage this in an effective and efficient way.

Business development

I look forward to joining Cromwell Mayor Enzo Faienza, Town Manager Tony Salvatore, Chamber Cromwell Division Chairman Rodney Bitgood, and other local leaders for the grand opening celebration for Café Fiore Cromwell at 134 Berlin Road on Thursday afternoon.

Conveniently located off Interstate 91 and close to Route 9, Cafe Fiore Cromwell offers an outstanding menu, a cocktail lounge, indoor and outdoor dining, banquet rooms, and much more. We wish Executive Chef Rusty Cecunjanin and the entire Café Fiore Cromwell team nothing but the best as they embark on this delicious new venture.

Closing out the week on Friday, I look forward to joining chamber Vice President Jeff Pugliese for a trip down to Essex to meet with the new President and CEO of Essex Savings Bank, Diane Arnold. Diane recently took over for longtime president Greg Shook, who did a great job in this important role.

Essex Savings Bank is a very important member of our chamber and lower county stakeholder here in our region. We look forward to a great discussion, and to continuing a strong working relationship.

Tropical storm response

In closing, I want to take a moment to thank all of our local and state leaders, Eversource President Joe Nolan and his team, and the emergency management teams in Connecticut who were ready to respond in a big way to Tropical Storm Henri. While the storm tracked east and spared Connecticut a direct hit, the infrastructure for a strong response was in place, and we here at the chamber are grateful for everyone’s efforts.

This will not be the last storm that will hit our state, and every time we are faced with this situation, we learn a little bit more. The chamber looks forward to supporting these efforts moving forward, and we will continue to stress the importance of having an emergency plan and business continuing plan in place and ready to go, because, as we have learned, it is not if — but when — another storm will hit.

Despite this fact, the sun always shines in Middlesex County!

Larry McHugh is president of the Middlesex County Chamber of Commerce in Middletown.


Affordable units may be part of downtown Shelton development

Brian Gioiele

SHELTON - Affordable housing could be part of the proposed development for land on Canal Street tucked between the railroad tracks and Veterans Memorial Park.

Developer John Guedes, a Shelton resident and owner of Primrose Companies, tweaked his plans for construction of a five-story structure, dubbed Riverview Park Royal, with 11,000 square feet of retail or commercial space and 92 apartments at property listed as 113-123 Canal St.

The modified plans, presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission Tuesday in what was the second public hearing on this application, call for eight studio units designated as affordable under state statute 8-30g, the state’s affordable housing law. He also added five parking spaces, bringing the total to 184 on site.

Overall, there would be 24 studio apartments, along with 20 one-bedrooms, 44 two-bedrooms and four three-bedroom apartments.

The commission continued the hearing, as Guedes awaits a final decision from the Inland Wetlands Commission. He must also submit building elevation renderings. No date has been set yet for the continued public hearing.

Commissioners asked Guedes if the eight affordable units needed to be studios, to which he replied that only the studios would be available under that designation.

“I’m making an accommodation,” Guedes said. “All the affordable units are the studios, or I will remove those (affordable units) from the plans.”

Guedes increased the parking total, making it two spaces for each unit after commissioners voiced concern about the amount of parking allocated for 92 units.

The site, as proposed, would have outside parking and more spots in a lower-level parking garage. Attorney Dominick Thomas, representing Guedes, said there would be 92 spots designated for tenants - the remainder for the general uses at the property. Thomas added that there are plenty of nearby city parking areas to accommodate the commercial or retail uses too, if renters are using more than one space.

The city has owned the 2.57-acre property for years after seizing it following the previous owner’s failure to pay back taxes. Guedes and his partner, Biaggio Barone, have a contract to purchase the land from the city.

The deal also includes Guedes covering the cost of extending the River Walk from Veterans Memorial Park, along the river and ending at Canal Street East.

The application asks for a special exception for the property, which sits on the Housatonic River in a River Front District.


Proposed $8.8 million Main Street project would be first to receive Norwich grant money

Claire Bessette  

Norwich — An $8.8 million redevelopment of two long-vacant Main Street buildings stands to become the first recipient of city grant and loan money through a revived economic development program if approved by the City Council.

Norwich Luxury Apartments LLC purchased the two-building complex at 77-91 Main St. in early August for $1.8 million and is proposing an $8.8 million makeover of the 19th century buildings into 42 market-rate apartments and eight street-level commercial spaces. The buildings had been proposed as a Norwich heritage museum in the 1990s, a project that eventually fell through after it had received grant money from the state to stabilize the decaying buildings.

The project on Thursday received unanimous support from the Norwich Community Development Corp. board of directors for a $400,000 matching grant for building code corrections and a separate $400,000 loan. But the action is contingent upon the City Council’s approval of a plan to use $2 million of the city’s $14.4 million in American Rescue Plan grants to revive the former downtown revitalization program and expand it citywide.

The council is scheduled to vote on City Manager John Salomone’s spending plan for the ARP grant money on Sept. 7.

But NCDC President Kevin Brown said the board wanted to show its support with a contingency vote Thursday to allow the developers to continue their planning and design for the project.

“This project is an $8.8 million project in downtown Norwich,” Brown said. “That’s a 10 to 1 return on the public dollars put into this thing if we get the approval to move forward and use the ARP for this.”

Even if the council approves the ARP spending plan Monday, NCDC has a few more steps to go through before it can allocate the proposed $2 million. The expanded economic development revitalization program must be designed, and NCDC must sign an agreement with the city for use of the funds. Brown said the former downtown program will be used as the basis, with funding to be divided into a building code correction program, a lease rebate to assist new businesses and a revolving loan, with the proceeds remaining in the program to assist future developers.

The grant to the Main Street project would come under the code correction and the revolving loan, Brown said.

Project attorney Stanley Schutzman said in an email to The Day describing the project that the city’s funds would be vital in allowing the project to move forward. But he said the city’s money would not be drawn down until the project renovations receive a certificate of occupancy from city inspectors.

“It is enabling the development to occur,” Schutzman said in the email. “This development satisfies the criteria and intent of the funds both in terms of spurring downtown redevelopment and economic activity as well as bringing the properties to current code compliance.”

The proposed project calls for 42 loft-style apartments with a fitness center for tenants, recreation room, “clean and green” appliances, high-speed communications infrastructure and other amenities. The developers hope to negotiate leased parking spaces in the city’s two nearby parking garages for tenants.

The two buildings would undergo a full façade restoration to their original historical appearance, retaining the “beautiful masonry exterior, arches and fine architectural details,” Schutzman wrote. A glass display case in the lobby will feature artifacts specific to the buildings’ history.

Schutzman said the developers expect to submit plans, designed by local architect Stefan Nousiopoulos, to the city within the next few weeks and would start construction following approval. The project is expected to take 12 to 16 months to complete.

Brown said the Main Street project is exactly the type of development NCDC hopes to support in downtown and other sections of the city. He said bringing 42 market-rate apartments to Main Street would mean customers for nearby restaurants and pubs, downtown shops and city functions.

He said NCDC staff, including former President Jason Vincent, who died in December, and interim transition specialist Fawn Walker had been working with the developers through the planning stages of the project. Given the “high potential” that NCDC would receive the ARP dollars, the agency staff brought it to the board for approval on Thursday.

“We would not be this committal if we weren’t confident that project financing is imminent,” Brown said.


August 30, 2021

CT Construction Digest Monday August 30, 2021

On the Move: Work on Arrigoni, East Haddam swing bridges will have impact

Larry McHugh

MIDDLETOWN — Another busy week is on tap for the chamber team as we come up on Labor Day here in Middlesex County.

On the chamber calendar front, this week features the return of the chamber divisions after a brief summer hiatus. We will kick off the division year on Wednesday morning with an important meeting of the Portland and East Hampton division on Zoom.

The September meeting of the chamber’s Central Business Bureau, which covers issues of importance to the business community in downtown Middletown, will be held Thursday morning.

The Chester, Deep River and Essex Division will get together Friday for the first time since June. These meetings will feature reports from local and state officials, business leaders in each town, and other important stakeholders.

While our staff plays a key role in these meetings, I want to take a moment to thank our division chairs, and all members that support these important meetings on a monthly basis. Our grassroots divisions help us keep a close eye on the issues that directly impact or have the potential to impact our members in each of our towns.

We look forward to a productive week of meetings.

On the infrastructure front, the chamber continues to do its best to play a constructive role in the important river crossing projects happening in Middlesex County.

Bridge construction

The rehabilitation of Arrigoni Bridge approach spans and operational improvements at St. John’s Square / Main Street intersection in Middletown and Portland are moving right along and expected to wrap up in the early part of 2022.

The work group that we established in 2020 has been meeting regularly, and has done a great job of ensuring access to the bridge for emergency management and other critical vehicles, all while doing its best to minimize the economic impact of the construction on local businesses.

This committee features municipal and state leaders from both sides of the bridge, district and project leaders from the state Department of Transportation, project manager from the contractor, Mohawk Northeast, first responders from both sides, Middlesex Health, and of course, businesspeople of all stripes.

After the project on the Arrigoni wraps up, our attention will turn toward the East Haddam Swing Bridge Rehabilitation Project, scheduled to begin in the spring. There is no way around the fact that this project will have a major impact on the towns of Haddam and East Haddam, and the whole central part of Middlesex County over the course of three construction seasons.

The bridge needs to be closed for significant stretches in order for the work to get done. The chamber hosted a special meeting of our East Haddam and Haddam Division Thursday, which featured a presentation from DOT on the current plan for the project and over 50 of our member businesses.

The chamber will be launching a new committee that will work to minimize the impact of this project as well, using the Arrigoni Bridge work group as a model. We look forward to playing an important role throughout this project, and I would like to thank DOT, our elected leaders, and everyone who is working together to manage this in an effective and efficient way.

Business development

I look forward to joining Cromwell Mayor Enzo Faienza, Town Manager Tony Salvatore, Chamber Cromwell Division Chairman Rodney Bitgood, and other local leaders for the grand opening celebration for Café Fiore Cromwell at 134 Berlin Road on Thursday afternoon.

Conveniently located off Interstate 91 and close to Route 9, Cafe Fiore Cromwell offers an outstanding menu, a cocktail lounge, indoor and outdoor dining, banquet rooms, and much more. We wish Executive Chef Rusty Cecunjanin and the entire Café Fiore Cromwell team nothing but the best as they embark on this delicious new venture.

Closing out the week on Friday, I look forward to joining chamber Vice President Jeff Pugliese for a trip down to Essex to meet with the new President and CEO of Essex Savings Bank, Diane Arnold. Diane recently took over for longtime president Greg Shook, who did a great job in this important role.

Essex Savings Bank is a very important member of our chamber and lower county stakeholder here in our region. We look forward to a great discussion, and to continuing a strong working relationship.

Tropical storm response

In closing, I want to take a moment to thank all of our local and state leaders, Eversource President Joe Nolan and his team, and the emergency management teams in Connecticut who were ready to respond in a big way to Tropical Storm Henri. While the storm tracked east and spared Connecticut a direct hit, the infrastructure for a strong response was in place, and we here at the chamber are grateful for everyone’s efforts.

This will not be the last storm that will hit our state, and every time we are faced with this situation, we learn a little bit more. The chamber looks forward to supporting these efforts moving forward, and we will continue to stress the importance of having an emergency plan and business continuing plan in place and ready to go, because, as we have learned, it is not if — but when — another storm will hit.

Despite this fact, the sun always shines in Middlesex County!

Larry McHugh is president of the Middlesex County Chamber of Commerce in Middletown.


Affordable units may be part of downtown Shelton development

Brian Gioiele

SHELTON - Affordable housing could be part of the proposed development for land on Canal Street tucked between the railroad tracks and Veterans Memorial Park.

Developer John Guedes, a Shelton resident and owner of Primrose Companies, tweaked his plans for construction of a five-story structure, dubbed Riverview Park Royal, with 11,000 square feet of retail or commercial space and 92 apartments at property listed as 113-123 Canal St.

The modified plans, presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission Tuesday in what was the second public hearing on this application, call for eight studio units designated as affordable under state statute 8-30g, the state’s affordable housing law. He also added five parking spaces, bringing the total to 184 on site.

Overall, there would be 24 studio apartments, along with 20 one-bedrooms, 44 two-bedrooms and four three-bedroom apartments.

The commission continued the hearing, as Guedes awaits a final decision from the Inland Wetlands Commission. He must also submit building elevation renderings. No date has been set yet for the continued public hearing.

Commissioners asked Guedes if the eight affordable units needed to be studios, to which he replied that only the studios would be available under that designation.

“I’m making an accommodation,” Guedes said. “All the affordable units are the studios, or I will remove those (affordable units) from the plans.”

Guedes increased the parking total, making it two spaces for each unit after commissioners voiced concern about the amount of parking allocated for 92 units.

The site, as proposed, would have outside parking and more spots in a lower-level parking garage. Attorney Dominick Thomas, representing Guedes, said there would be 92 spots designated for tenants - the remainder for the general uses at the property. Thomas added that there are plenty of nearby city parking areas to accommodate the commercial or retail uses too, if renters are using more than one space.

The city has owned the 2.57-acre property for years after seizing it following the previous owner’s failure to pay back taxes. Guedes and his partner, Biaggio Barone, have a contract to purchase the land from the city.

The deal also includes Guedes covering the cost of extending the River Walk from Veterans Memorial Park, along the river and ending at Canal Street East.

The application asks for a special exception for the property, which sits on the Housatonic River in a River Front District.


Proposed $8.8 million Main Street project would be first to receive Norwich grant money

Claire Bessette  

Norwich — An $8.8 million redevelopment of two long-vacant Main Street buildings stands to become the first recipient of city grant and loan money through a revived economic development program if approved by the City Council.

Norwich Luxury Apartments LLC purchased the two-building complex at 77-91 Main St. in early August for $1.8 million and is proposing an $8.8 million makeover of the 19th century buildings into 42 market-rate apartments and eight street-level commercial spaces. The buildings had been proposed as a Norwich heritage museum in the 1990s, a project that eventually fell through after it had received grant money from the state to stabilize the decaying buildings.

The project on Thursday received unanimous support from the Norwich Community Development Corp. board of directors for a $400,000 matching grant for building code corrections and a separate $400,000 loan. But the action is contingent upon the City Council’s approval of a plan to use $2 million of the city’s $14.4 million in American Rescue Plan grants to revive the former downtown revitalization program and expand it citywide.

The council is scheduled to vote on City Manager John Salomone’s spending plan for the ARP grant money on Sept. 7.

But NCDC President Kevin Brown said the board wanted to show its support with a contingency vote Thursday to allow the developers to continue their planning and design for the project.

“This project is an $8.8 million project in downtown Norwich,” Brown said. “That’s a 10 to 1 return on the public dollars put into this thing if we get the approval to move forward and use the ARP for this.”

Even if the council approves the ARP spending plan Monday, NCDC has a few more steps to go through before it can allocate the proposed $2 million. The expanded economic development revitalization program must be designed, and NCDC must sign an agreement with the city for use of the funds. Brown said the former downtown program will be used as the basis, with funding to be divided into a building code correction program, a lease rebate to assist new businesses and a revolving loan, with the proceeds remaining in the program to assist future developers.

The grant to the Main Street project would come under the code correction and the revolving loan, Brown said.

Project attorney Stanley Schutzman said in an email to The Day describing the project that the city’s funds would be vital in allowing the project to move forward. But he said the city’s money would not be drawn down until the project renovations receive a certificate of occupancy from city inspectors.

“It is enabling the development to occur,” Schutzman said in the email. “This development satisfies the criteria and intent of the funds both in terms of spurring downtown redevelopment and economic activity as well as bringing the properties to current code compliance.”

The proposed project calls for 42 loft-style apartments with a fitness center for tenants, recreation room, “clean and green” appliances, high-speed communications infrastructure and other amenities. The developers hope to negotiate leased parking spaces in the city’s two nearby parking garages for tenants.

The two buildings would undergo a full façade restoration to their original historical appearance, retaining the “beautiful masonry exterior, arches and fine architectural details,” Schutzman wrote. A glass display case in the lobby will feature artifacts specific to the buildings’ history.

Schutzman said the developers expect to submit plans, designed by local architect Stefan Nousiopoulos, to the city within the next few weeks and would start construction following approval. The project is expected to take 12 to 16 months to complete.

Brown said the Main Street project is exactly the type of development NCDC hopes to support in downtown and other sections of the city. He said bringing 42 market-rate apartments to Main Street would mean customers for nearby restaurants and pubs, downtown shops and city functions.

He said NCDC staff, including former President Jason Vincent, who died in December, and interim transition specialist Fawn Walker had been working with the developers through the planning stages of the project. Given the “high potential” that NCDC would receive the ARP dollars, the agency staff brought it to the board for approval on Thursday.

“We would not be this committal if we weren’t confident that project financing is imminent,” Brown said.



August 27, 2021

CT Construction Digest Friday August 27, 2021

Bristol Planning Commission grants conditional approval for new subdivision off of Redstone Hill Road

Dean Wright

BRISTOL – The Bristol Planning Commission met Wednesday evening and granted conditional approval for a new subdivision to be built off Redstone Hill Road.

Nearby residents of Redstone Hill Road and construction project representatives gathered at a previous Planning Commission meeting regarding a new development to be called Charlie’s Way, consisting of 18 lots from 505 to 545 Redstone Hill Road. No votes were taken at the July meeting. Some residents expressed concerns about the addition of sidewalks and whether traffic studies around the property were accurate due to one being done over the course of the pandemic in 2019.

Similar concerns were voiced at the August meeting. Ultimately, the commission’s five voting members chose to grant a conditional approval to the project and the deferment of sidewalks along the northwestern portion of the proposed Charlie’s Way. Sidewalks would still be required along Redstone Hill Road though leading to Charlie’s Way and a sidewalk would be placed on its southeasterly side of Charlie’s Way. It was noted during the meeting that this did not mean a sidewalk would never be created on the northwestern portion of the road but that the discussion could be revisited in the future if need be. The project would also be required to deposit over $30,000 into the city’s storm trust in order to maintain storm water drainage structures.

The applicant and purchaser-developer listed for the subdivision’s creation according to project paperwork on the Bristol city website was named 505-545 Redstone Hill Road LLC with the accompanying signature of Charles Barzee. 

Due to an open area in the subdivision, the property will be subject to the purview of a homeowners' association, as per Connecticut law. There is also a wetlands area connected with the western portion of the subdivision.

The site consists of roughly 14 acres with two already existing homes that would remain as other construction continues. Proposed lots would make up around 7.7 acres of the project and the open space would consist of around 5.3 acres. The site is within the city’s R15 zone. Homes on the site may be constructed between 1,500 and 2,500 square feet. Prices for such dwellings would range cost between $350,000 to $425,000. The homes would be mixed styles depending on the market and desire of buyers, said attorney Andrre Dorval, representing subdivision developers.

Engineer Scott Hesketh of FA Hesketh & Associates presented information on Connecticut Department of Transportation traffic studies done in the area in 2009, 2015 and 2020. He said that 2009 showed the highest traffic in the area in recent memory with numbers in 2015 and 2020 being lower. If one took 2015 traffic numbers and increased them by 25 percent, he still felt the addition of the subdivision would not adversely affect current traffic rates as numbers seemed to be trending down. He called this a “conservative estimate.” Hesketh noted he utilized industry-wide standards and programs when coming to his determination.

Commissioner Andrew Howe asked if one could really know whether this information was accurate given the last study was done over the course of the pandemic with most businesses and traffic having stopped over a period of time.

Hesketh noted he utilized industry-wide standards and programs when coming to his determination and that it was not an uncommon approach for estimations because residential traffic and shopping centers were perhaps the most studied traffic patterns in the U.S.

Residents near Redstone Hill Road urged the commission to require sidewalks along Redstone Hill Road and on both sides of Charlie’s Way due to concerns with safety.


New Haven planners OK improvements to Tweed airport terminals despite opposition

NEW HAVEN — Tweed New Haven Regional Airport’s immediate plan to renovate the existing terminal and the airport’s older administration building into departure and arrival terminals, and add 271 parking spaces on what used to be the airport’s second runway, gained an important step.

The City Plan Commission unanimously approved the airport’s site plan and coastal site plan, as well as a flood plain permit and special permit for the additional parking following a 31/2-hour special meeting Wednesday night, during which it heard mostly from neighbors opposed to the plan.

While several members sympathized with concerns about traffic, noise and climate change — and acknowledged that, with regard to the latter, some of the city’s rules may be out of date — they said that based on the rules in place, the application merited approval.

They also were sympathetic to the airport team’s argument that the plan would better serve Tweed and was only a temporary solution until it puts forth a more comprehensive — and controversial — plan to extend the existing runway by 1,035 feet and build a new, larger terminal on the East Haven side of the airport as part of a $100 million expansion plan.

Members Adam Marchand, Ernest Pagan, Vice Chairman Ed Mattison, Chairwoman Leslie Radcliff and newly-appointed alternate Carl Goldfield all voted in favor.

“I’ve used that airport and I feel that the changes that are being proposed will help it function better, even without the large-scale enhancements that are being proposed,” said Alder Marchand, D-25, who is the Board of Alders’ representative on the City Plan Commission.

Nevertheless, “there are things I’m concerned about,” Marchand said. But “unless we are proposing to shut the airport, then we should help it to function better.”

Marchand acknowledged that “in the age of global climate change, we need to be examining” the city’s standards and zoning codes.

“The issue, for me, is that ... our rules are somewhat out of date,” said Mattison. Nevertheless, “I will vote to support it because it does meet our current requirements ... but I don’t think our requirements make sense. I think they should be much more focused on resilience.”

Goldfield said that “within the constraints of what we were presented with, I feel that letting this go forward is the right thing to do.”

Radcliffe said that as commission members, “we have a very narrow lane that we’re being asked to stay in. Does it meet the requirements and is it in alignment with our comprehensive plan?

“As a commissioner, the application is approvable,” she said just prior to the vote.

Tweed Executive Director Sean Scanlon said afterward that “when we first announced this project in May, we made clear that there were many steps necessary to make it a reality. Tonight was one of those critical steps, and I want to thank the City Plan Commission for their thoughtful comments and support.

“We were grateful for the opportunity to collaborate with commission staff on these important issues and look forward to continued work with other city officials in the coming weeks, including the Board of Alders,” he said. “Through this process, we have and will continue to ensure this project is undertaken in a responsible and transparent manner.”

Commission approval of the interim plan comes as the longer-term plan, including a proposed 43-year lease and long-term management contract for Avports LLC, Tweed’s contract operator, is about to come before the Board of Alders.

Under the proposed arrangement, Avports would fund up to $100 million in improvements — including a new terminal, runway extension and moving the airport’s entrance to the East Haven side off Proto Drive — eliminating the need for the $1.8 million in state and local subsidies Tweed receives each year.

In total, the commission received 12 letters in favor of the application and 21 in opposition.

Of the dozen or so residents who spoke Wednesday, all but one were opposed.

Carl Testa, vice chairman of the city’s Quinnipiac East Community Management Team, submitted a motion unanimously recommending that that the commission and the Board of Alders postpone voting on Tweed until additional information can be delivered.

Lighthouse Road resident Rachel Hareema, organizer of the 10,000 Hawks opposition group, told members, “My big question for the commission is, ‘What about our health?’”

Hareema said that asthma “is very prevalent” in New Haven and air pollution from more planes “is huge” and “a triggering factor in asthma.”

Resident Gretl Gallicchio told the commission, “I am vehemently opposed to the ... expansion. ... It seems to me that proceeding with any construction, any preliminary steps is highly irresponsible” at a time when “we do not have completed environmental impact studies.”

Gallicchio pointed out that “just this last weekend we had lots of flooding on the runways down here. ... I think the consideration of a plan like this in the age of climate change ... is extremely irresponsible.”

Julia McFadden of Townsend Avenue said she was concerned about traffic along Townsend Avenue.

“This needs more study,” McFadden said.

The one resident who spoke in favor of Tweed’s application was William Villano, a Townsend Avenue resident who also is director of the Workforce Alliance, which is working with Tweed and its new airline, Avelo Airlines, to train people for about 100 jobs being offered locally.

Avelo last week announced plans to being flying from Tweed to four Florida cities — Orlando, Fort Laudedale, Tampa and Fort Myers — on Nov. 3.

“I support the increase in service at Tweed,” Villano said, who said it “will create new pathways to jobs for New Haven residents ... I live only a few blocks from the airport and takeoff noise levels is minimal.”

Lisa Bassani of Nelson Street in Morris Cove, said that “FEMA projects this airport to be under water by 2050” and “the neighborhood and adjacent neighborhoods face ongoing flooding issues.”

Gabriela Campos Matteson of Stewart Street said what Tweed is looking to do “is an imposition of a giant airport. Bradley is not in a residential neighborhood,” she said of the state’s much larger Bradley International Airport in Windsor Locks.

“We live on marshes. The roads have sinkholes,” she said. She said of the airport, “This is city property. This should be for the benefit of the residents. Not one resident who I’ve spoken to is in favor of it.”

East Haven resident Lorena Venegas said the commission had to deny the permit because the applicant had sought a waiver not to use required reflective heat coatings.

Tweed’s development team, led by attorney Joseph Williams, urged the commission to approve the application.

Josh Wilson, a senior ecologist and professional wetlands scientist for Fuss & O’Neill, pointed out that there would be no addition of impervious area on the site — and sum total of the project actually would be to decrease the amount of paved area, as well as improved stormwater management, with “no adverse impacts to coastal resources.”

Airport consultant Andrew Vasey said there would be a net reduction of 1,300 square feet of pavement as a result of the project. The new parking would be on what already are paved surfaces from the former crosswind runway, he said.

“We were careful not to pave a new parking lot,” he said.

Mattison at one point said he thought the commisions ought to hire “somebody who is an independent professional to give us advice.”

City Plan Director Aicha Woods told the commission, however, that “there have been about nine internal technical review meetings on this,” and “this has certainly been looked at by our own experts” in the Building Department, City Plan and the Engineering Department.

She pointed out that as an architect, “I’ve worked as a consultant designing airports.” She said Mattison’s suggestion “would be a very good one” for the more permanent plans at Tweed.

She and Williams both pointed out that the plan before the commission Wednesday was for a temporary solution that would last about three years.




August 26, 2021

CT Construction Digest Thursday August 26, 2021

Fairfield officials approve affordable housing project on Park Ave. with several conditions

Serenity Bishop

FAIRFIELD — The green light has finally been given to Primrose Development LLC to build an affordable housing complex at 5545 Park Ave., but only if the building’s height is reduced.

Primrose Development LLC had applied to build a six-story, 120-unit apartment building, with 36 apartments qualifying as affordable housing. The property would rest on a 2.4 acre property with nearly 200 parking spots.

Commissioner Thomas Noonan proposed that the development be approved, but only if the building was reduced to four stories, the color of the exterior of the building was changed to blend in with the surroundings and more trees and plant life were planted to protect the integrity of the Merritt Parkway.

“I think it goes without saying that the Merritt Parkway is a historic resource,” Noonan said. “Four stories in my view is a reasonable change. The other conditions of approval the exterior color scheme and the extra planting will also serve to better either screen or at least make it pop less as drivers go down the Merritt Parkway.”

He said six stories would be visible from the parkway, both above and through the trees.

“Even if it was six stories with it being a similar color scheme of the area I still believe it to be too overpowering and too detrimental to the integrity of the Merritt Parkway,” Noonan said.

Noonan’s proposal was in line with the changes members of the Merritt Parkway Conservancy suggested during the last public hearing. Conservancy Executive Director Wes Haynes expressed the exact same changes the he wanted to see happen, but also went on to say that there was “nothing beautiful” about the project. He believed the project would be an intrusion into the very essential architectural character of the parkway and even referred to the project as, “God awful.”

Attorney Ray Rizio, who represents the developer, said in the last public hearing that people won’t see the project from the parkway whether it is four stories, six stories or eight stories tall because of the mature trees and people’s driving speeds. He did admit the building would be more visible during the winter when the leaves fall, but contested that it would not be an intrusive amount.

“I think we are all reluctant to have such a massive structure in Fairfield on the Merritt Parkway,” commission Secretary Meg Francis said.

Francis cautioned applying too many conditions could affect a judge’s assessment and could possibly lead to an appeal.

Prior to the developer’s 120-unit application, Primrose applied for a four-story structure with 80 units in late 2020. The project was denied, but when Primrose applied for the 120-unit building the new application was made under state law Section 8-30g, which dictates the only way the commission could deny the plan is to prove it poses a threat to public health, welfare and safety that outweighs Fairfield’s need for affordable housing.

In regards to the development, Francis simply said, “We have to accept reality.”

The commission included one last condition that required Primrose to complete the required testing for drainage engineering before starting construction.

This condition was added during the decision vote as Commissioner Kathryn Braun questioned whether the proposal had the appropriate wetlands approval. Braun was the only commissioner who did not vote to approve the project citing the lack of information about the environmental impact of the development.


Sen. Murphy: Millions of dollars in potential investments for New London

Greg Smith  

New London — A series of infrastructure spending plans being considered by Congress would potentially lead to an investment of “tens of millions of dollars” to the U.S. Coast Guard Academy and city of New London, U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn said.

Murphy met with local business and city leaders and state legislators at City Hall on Wednesday to talk about the potential for federal investments locally over the next 10 years. The bipartisan infrastructure bill passed by the Senate earlier this month includes $59 million for the Coast Guard Academy.

A $6 million portion of that funding would come directly to the city’s waterfront in the form of improvements to City Pier in order to accommodate the barque Eagle. New London’s City Council in April approved a license agreement with the Coast Guard to provide a berth for “America’s Tall Ship” adjacent to the future National Coast Guard Museum, a $100 million facility to be built behind Union Station. The Coast Guard is the only branch of the armed services without a national museum, and the association still is in the fundraising and permitting phase for the museum.

Murphy said he expects future federal investments toward the museum as part of an appropriations bill not associated with the infrastructure bill. Murphy is a member of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee and chairman of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security.

“I’m the chairman of the committee that writes the Coast Guard’s budget," Murphy said. "Obviously this is a top priority for me, to continue funding the Coast Guard museum.”

He said one of the reasons for his visit to the city on Wednesday was to ensure the city is prepared with a plan to accommodate the influx of people associated with the museum.

“I think the plan’s there and it’s my job to work with them and refine it and find the money for it,” Murphy said.

New London Mayor Michael Passero said the city is seeking federal funds for expansion of the Water Street parking garage, which would provide a link for a state-funded $20 million bridge spanning the railroad tracks and connecting the city's waterfront and the site of the new museum.

“I’m just such a believer in the future of New London and there’s a lot of potential for federal investment here over the next 10 years,” Murphy said. “I wanted an hour to step back and start to think about the vision for the city and how the museum and the pier and the housing investments can work together, so that I can present sort of a united vision for the city when I’m making these asks in Washington.”

Among those gathered at Wednesday’s event were representatives from Electric Boat, the Coast Guard Academy, Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments, Southeast CT Cultural Coalition and U.S. Coast Guard Museum Association President and retired Capt. Wes Pulver.

Pulver said he was excited by Murphy’s commitment to the region and the Coast Guard. “The museum is just one piece of what’s happening downtown," he said. "This is exciting to see it all come together.”

Murphy called it a “unique moment in New London,” considering the number of potential areas for investment.

“This is an opportunity to make the plan they’ve been working on for years real,” he said.

Included in the bipartisan infrastructure plan is $25 million for infrastructure upgrades and modernization of the Coast Guard Academy’s power and heating system and $28 million for renovation of Chase Hall, which serves as the barracks for cadet and officer training school.

The Coast Guard Academy’s external affairs officer, Cmdr. Krystyn Pecora, said renovations to Chase Hall are underway, along with a major overhaul of a waterfront area known as Pine Hall, which is being transformed into the Maritime Center of Excellence. Murphy said the infrastructure bill additionally contains funds needed for upgrades and maintenance of rail infrastructure, including bridges and station upgrades.


Developer begins $14 million New Britain project; six-story building will be latest move to revitalize downtown

Don Stacom

Mayor Erin Stewart used a 52,000-pound excavator Wednesday morning to rip into the brick walls of the long-vacant Burritt Bank building, an early step in developer Avner Krohn’s plan to replace it with a six-story apartment complex and retail building.

The estimated $14 million project will be the biggest single change to the downtown skyline in decades.

ADVERTISING

Krohn, who has become the most prominent business owner in the downtown’s redevelopment, predicted the new complex will help revitalize one of the city’s busiest commercial corners.

The two-story bank headquarters has sat idle at Bank and Main streets in the heart of the city since the Burritt InterFinancial Bancorporation failed in 1992.

“As long as I’ve been alive, really, this building has been unoccupied,” Stewart said at a brief ceremony to begin demolition. The mayor was just 5 when federal banking authorities shut down Burritt,

“It’s been a source of blight in downtown,” Stewart added. “Avner has a vision, a strong vision, for downtown that he’s been committed to since 2005.”

Krohn, a New York developer who started investing in downtown buildings 16 years ago, said the city’s turnaround in recent years has been substantial.

“Online in 2005 I was searching in Connecticut. I had seen the Andrews Building and was quite impressed. I started looking at the area — courthouse, city hall, the core downtown, and thought this could be a good investment,” he said.

“At that time where the current police station is were a bunch of dilapidated buildings, the Rao Building was boarded up, the streetscapes were just a dream, CTfastrak wasn’t even talked about yet,” Krohn said. “But I thought with the right renovations, we could attract office tenants — we did. And then we started moving onto other projects.”

Krohn’s Jasko Development LLC converted the five-story, 29,000-square foot Andrews Building into apartments and rehabilitated and sold the historic Raphael Building on West Main. It also renovated and sold the five-story Rao Building downtown and has done numerous commercial projects elsewhere in the city as well as in Torrington, Bloomfield, Enfield and Vernon.

“I look at New Britain as a tapestry — it’s filled with history but it’s also a blank slate downtown,” Krohn said. “Now it’s changing drastically in a way where we can paint a new picture. It’s a manageable downtown, it’s walkable, I see live entertainment and restaurants and people living downtown.”

Krohn plans to construct a first-floor restaurant with extensive patio seating as well as rows of tables street-side. Unlike the Burritt, the new building will be set back from the sidewalks on both Bank and Main streets.

There also will be street-level retail space, on the second through sixth floors will be apartments. The opening is planned for early 2023.

“We’ll have all kinds of open storefronts. Almost an entire area of 5,000 square feet will be an outdoor urban oasis — probably a $1 million project as part of this project. Part of that will be restaurant space. We specifically changed the footprint so we have al fresco dining wrapping around Main and Bank,” Krohn said.

Stewart called the combination of retail and market-rate housing good for New Britain.

“Properties like this and mixed-use development that bring additional, up-to-date housing units downtown is exactly what the demand is now. People want new, they want to be in a downtown setting, they like what downtown New Britain has to offer,” she said. “But they need that excitement, that new development to bring them here.”

Krohn said over the next five years he sees Jasko adding another roughly 200 apartments downtown.


Contractors caught between vaccine hesitancy and owner mandates

Joe Bousquin

Construction was supposed to be getting back to normal by now.

In June, with vaccines rolling out broadly across the U.S. and COVID-19 case numbers plummeting, Labor Day was heralded by many as the date workers would return to offices, and the pandemic would largely be a fading memory.

But things aren't quite working out that way.

"We started reopening in June, and there was a lot of hope," said Laura Guzman, vice president of marketing and communications at Milpitas, California-based XL Construction. "But as we started to watch the most recent trends, we've had to hit the pause button again."

Steps include following local mask mandates, social distancing on jobsites and limiting company meetings and gatherings, Guzman said.  

XL isn't alone. Other construction pros who thought they would be plowing ahead on projects unfettered by the virus are now having to step back and re-institute many of the same protocols they relaxed earlier this year. They say that new COVID-19 challenges have emerged as construction heads into the second autumn of the pandemic.

"Contractors that we work with are doubling down on their efforts to make sure workers both in their offices and on jobsites, are following local and federal mandates," said Brian A. Wolf, a partner in the Fort Lauderdale, Florida, office of construction law firm Smith, Currie & Hancock. "They're taking the health and safety of their employees and the public very seriously."

Rising case numbers

Driven by the highly contagious delta variant and breakthrough infections even among the fully vaccinated, COVID-19 cases have surged again, and recently hit 100,000 new daily infections nationally, a metric not seen since February. Healthcare professionals predict the number could reach 200,000 within weeks. Analyzing preliminary data from six states, the New York Times recently reported that breakthrough cases accounted for between 18% and 28% of all new infections.

Josh Stark, senior vice president of construction at Chicago-based developer and contractor Focus, said the wider-ranging impacts of the current surge could hinder construction further, especially as material suppliers are just now ramping back up to capacity.

"We're seeing suppliers come back online, which is great. But if COVID starts to hit in a big way again, then do those businesses have to shut down?" Stark said. "That affects our industry from a supply perspective, so that's definitely a concern."

The surge is happening as mask mandates have returned in many localities, at the same time that many large employers, including the federal government, the U.S. military, United Airlines, Walmart and Disney have announced they'll require employees to be vaccinated to return to work.  

For construction, those issues are unfolding against the backdrop of an industry that continues to face heightened levels of vaccine hesitancy, with more than 40% of workers consistently saying they would choose not to get vaccinated, even if they had the opportunity to do so. Today, that hesitancy is running headlong into worries from workers who are vaccinated, as well as mandates from project owners who are now increasingly requiring only vaccinated workers on their jobsites.

According to Silver Spring, Maryland-based construction safety nonprofit CPWR — The Center for Construction Research and Training, construction vaccination rates have consistently lagged other occupations, while vaccine hesitancy has remained comparably high. 

"In the last few weeks, we've started to get vaccine mandates from owners on jobs," said Kyle Peacock, CEO of San Francisco-based Peacock Construction, who notes that approximately 75% of his direct employees are vaccinated, although rates among his subs are lower. "All of our healthcare clients are doing it, but we've also had a couple office tenants that said they're only going to let vaccinated people into their offices. It's an issue we're trying to solve."

A major concern among contractors now is that the perennial labor shortage within the construction industry, which had already been exacerbated by the pandemic, will only become worse as clients require vaccinations for jobsites.  

Take a recent letter to members from the Associated General Contractors of America's Inland Northwest Chapter, which includes eastern Washington state, shortly after Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee ordered most state workers to get vaccinated by Oct. 18.

"It is important to note that this mandate does apply to all employees, contractors, subs and suppliers that work on or have access to state worksites," Cheryl Stewart, the chapter's executive director, wrote. "I know many of you will have employees that will choose not to work on state projects if vaccination is required. It is also certain that state agencies will lose employees over this issue, so project delays all around are going to be the norm moving forward."

Indeed, Ken Simonson, chief economist for the AGC, citing construction employment levels that remain below their pre-pandemic peak in 36 states, said delta could cause shockwaves throughout the industry. 

"The fast-spreading COVID-19 delta variant may make it harder to find employees eligible to work on restricted sites and may also depress demand if some owners defer projects," Simonson said in a statement about July employment data. 

Keeping track

Beyond the impact of the number of workers they'll have for vaccinated jobsites, contractors facing mandates from clients are also challenged by how to implement these kinds of requirements.

"How do you monitor it? Are you going to be checking vaccination cards at the door?" said Peacock. "It would be relatively easy if it was just our employees, but we have hundreds of subcontractors coming to our jobsites every day, and then you have vendors making deliveries."

One solution Peacock and others have implemented is Safe Site Check In, a jobsite screening app that workers have used throughout the pandemic, which can be customized to ask about workers' vaccine status. That's what San Jose, California-based commercial contractor Landmark Builders has done. 

"We've got it now so there's basically only two questions: 'Are you vaccinated?', which gives them a yes-no choice, or 'I choose not to answer,'" said Sheri Dizon, Landmark's CFO, who noted that everyone in the firm's offices is vaccinated, “but in the field, it's very different."

The company has been tracking responses from the app on vaccination status, and has seen a 60% vaccinated, 40% unvaccinated rate among its subs, a ratio that aligns closely with construction worker vaccination surveys. "It's a political debate that you’re not going to win," Dizon said. “But if they're not vaccinated, they'll tell you.”

Landmark's clients have also asked for fully vaccinated workers on jobs. But in one case where a well-liked supervisor hadn't been vaccinated, the client allowed him to stay on the project. "They liked him, so they said he was fine," Dizon said.

Contractors such as XL and Peacock said they haven't issued vaccine mandates for their companies at this point, though they didn't rule out the possibility in the future. Instead, they have launched programs to encourage workers to get vaccinated and provided education to help workers decide.

"We brought in medical experts to explain the safety components and answer questions," XL's Guzman said. "We.ve just made an extreme effort of education to try to get as many folks as possible to make that choice for themselves."

Peacock said that while his lawyers have told him he can mandate workers to get vaccinations, there are still issues that have kept him from doing so.

"We are having that dialogue internally, but while everybody says you can legally do it, there's not a lot of case law surrounding it," Peacock said. "There are still some liabilities with that."


August 25, 2021

CT Construction Digest Wednesday August 25, 2021

Culvert Installation Continues on Cooper Street in Meriden VIDEO


CT needs federal transportation money, but spending it could be the challenge
















ERICA E. PHILLIPS

An expected $5.4 billion infusion of federal funds for Connecticut roads, bridges and other infrastructure is placing renewed pressure on the state’s transportation department, which construction operators say has been slow to proceed on projects already in the pipeline.

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, now before the Democrat-controlled U.S. House of Representatives after passing the Senate 69-30 earlier this month, includes $3.3 billion for Connecticut roads, $560 million for bridges and another $1.5 billion for transit, electric vehicle charging and other green infrastructure. That amounts to an increase of 17% to 20% over the current fiscal year in annual federal funding, according to a state DOT analysis.

And Connecticut needs it. The state’s transportation system is aging and overcrowded, in need of repairs and enhancements. For years, state spending has only managed to maintain the average condition of roads, bridges and rail lines — not improve it.

But getting federal money is one thing, and spending it on actual projects is another. The Department of Transportations expects to lose key employees in the coming months, and the state has had persistent problems funding even a sliver of its transportation needs — a situation that has sent some construction contractors to other states.

Gov. Ned Lamont called the federal legislation “an enormous down payment.” He said he estimates Connecticut will need to cover about 20% of the cost for the work.

Over the next five years, that would amount to roughly $1 billion in additional funding on top of standard repairs and maintenance. Lamont said the state will raise that money by issuing bonds and tapping new revenue from highway fees for commercial trucks.

The construction industry is wary of that plan.

More than $4 billion worth of work has already been approved — but not paid for. Budget shortfalls in recent years have prevented DOT from borrowing money to finance those projects. Analysts say that stalled bonding translates into thousands of construction and related jobs that could have been created — but were not.

Don Shubert, president of the Connecticut Construction Industry Association, said the status quo for transportation funding in Connecticut is tenuous as it is. Further uncertainty could lead the industry to pull back or seek out work in other states, he said.

“This is a huge opportunity,” Shubert said “Are we ready to maximize that opportunity, or will we let it languish?”

In an email, DOT spokesman Kevin Nursick said, “Since increased federal dollars will require an increased state match, we are actively looking at what areas we’ll need to work with our agency partners and the Legislature [on] to ensure Connecticut will deliver on the increased federal program.”

Staffing challenges

If DOT overcomes those funding roadblocks, the department could face staffing challenges as it plans and designs the next slate of major infrastructure projects.

Within the next year, thousands of state government employees are expected to retire — a result of new rules that capped benefits for those who leave government service after June 30, 2022. Dubbed the “silver tsunami,” the exodus could leave DOT without key engineers and the institutional knowledge base needed to expeditiously produce project designs and get them out for bidding.

And replacing those workers won’t be easy. Commissioner Joseph Giulietti has expressed frustration at Connecticut’s drawn-out hiring process and the Office of Policy and Management’s proclivity to keeping jobs open to save money.

“We are currently looking closely at our capacity, retirements and the influx of new federal funding,” Nursick said. “We will continue to work closely with our [Office of Policy and Management] and [Department of Administrative Services] partners on staffing needs and our ability to bring new, diverse talent into the DOT, along with any consulting and contractor needs associated with new federal funding.”

Even if staffing problems persist, the federal money is spurring a range of actions — within and outside of the transportation department — to help the construction industry ramp up over the next several years.

Last week, Kelli-Marie Vallieres, executive director of Connecticut’s Office of Workforce Strategy, met with union labor leader Keith Brothers to begin laying out a strategy to recruit and train construction laborers for the extensive work ahead. Vallieres said she’s tapping funding in the American Rescue Plan Act targeted for specific workforce development initiatives, as well as $40 million from recent state legislation to fill in the gaps. She described it as “an unprecedented amount of funding.”

The challenge will be timing those efforts so there’s a “pipeline of people” recruited and trained to fill jobs as they become available — not too soon, and not too late. “It’s almost like a just-in-time process,” Vallieres said.

To be successful will require a systematic approach, she said. “It’s really important to start to collaborate and coordinate with the building trade unions, the Department of Transportation and other agencies to ensure we have a forward-thinking plan, knowing that demand is on the horizon,” she said.

In remarks outside the Construction and General Laborers Local Union hall in Hartford last week, Brothers said the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act would create an estimated 1 million jobs in the building trades and help to develop the next generation of construction workers through union apprenticeship and training programs.

Lawmakers have also referred to the legislation as a “generational” investment. U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said the bill encompasses the nation’s biggest investment in physical assets since the New Deal.

“It’s not just ‘Infrastructure Week,’” Blumenthal said. “It’s going to be an ‘Infrastructure Decade.’”


House Passes $3.5 Trillion Budget Plan for Vast Expansion of Safety Net

Democratic leaders had to haggle their way to passage, committing to moderates that there would be a vote on the $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure plan by Sept. 27.

By Emily Cochrane

WASHINGTON — A divided House on Tuesday approved a $3.5 trillion budget blueprint that would pave the way for a vast expansion of social safety net and climate programs, as Democrats overcame sharp internal rifts to advance a critical piece of President Biden’s ambitious domestic agenda.

Approving the budget was a major step in Democrats’ drive to enact their top priorities — including huge investments in education, child care, health care, paid leave, and tax increases on wealthy people and corporations — over united Republican opposition. With a single vote on Tuesday, they laid the groundwork to move quickly on legislation that would accomplish those goals, setting a late September deadline for action on a $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure package.

But it came only after leaders stamped out a revolt among conservative-leaning Democrats, who withheld their votes until they extracted a promise to vote on the infrastructure bill by Sept. 27. The breakthrough came after a pressure campaign by the White House, outside progressive groups and Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California, who haggled and cajoled her way to unanimous Democratic support for a measure that had been stalled mere hours before.

The vote was 220 to 212 on party lines to approve the budget plan and allow future votes on both the infrastructure bill and a voting rights measure that the House passed soon after.

While the budget plan, which passed the Senate this month, does not have the force of law, it allows Democrats to move forward with a fast-track process known as reconciliation. That would enshrine the details of the blueprint in legislation that is shielded from a filibuster, allowing it to pass over the objections of Republicans.

It is expected to include universal preschool, paid family leave, federal support for child care and elder care, an expansion of Medicare and a broad effort to tackle climate change — all paid for through tax increases on high earners and companies.

“Today is a great day of pride for our country and for Democrats,” Ms. Pelosi declared on the House floor, after days of intensive talks with rank-and-file lawmakers. “Not only are we building the physical infrastructure of America, we are building the human infrastructure of America to enable many more people to participate in the success of our economy and the growth of our society.”

Speaking at the White House shortly after, Mr. Biden called Ms. Pelosi “masterful,” and lavished praise on the party’s leadership team and every congressional Democrat who ultimately supported the legislation.

“There were differences, strong points of view — they’re always welcome,” the president said. “What is important is that we came together to advance our agenda.”

But the herculean effort it took to do so only served to illustrate the difficult road ahead for Mr. Biden’s agenda on Capitol Hill, where Democrats’ small majorities and ideological divisions — as well as Republican opposition — have left the party with little room to maneuver.

The same differences between moderates and progressives that nearly derailed the plan this week promise to resurface in the weeks to come, as progressives push to make the reconciliation bill as far-reaching as possible and conservative-leaning Democrats work to limit its scope.

In a joint statement, Representative Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey and eight other moderates who had conditioned their votes for the budget on a deadline for action on infrastructure boasted that their group had succeeded in making sure that the bipartisan bill would “receive stand-alone consideration, fully de-linked, and on its own merits.”

But moments after the budget plan passed, a large group of liberal Democrats signaled that they still regarded the two measures as linked, raising the prospect of another standoff next month.

“As our members have made clear for three months, the two are integrally tied together, and we will only vote for the infrastructure bill after passing the reconciliation bill,” Representative Pramila Jayapal of Washington, the leader of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said in a statement.

In the evenly divided Senate, leaders need the votes of every Democrat and independent — plus Vice President Kamala Harris, who can break ties — to win passage of the reconciliation bill. In the House, the margin is only slightly more forgiving, allowing as few as three Democrats to defect if all Republicans are opposed, as expected.

The commitment to a Sept. 27 vote on the bipartisan infrastructure package added to a chaotic series of deadlines next month, when lawmakers will have only a few days in Washington to consider the infrastructure bill, prevent a lapse in government funding on Oct. 1, and steer the government away from the brink of a catastrophic debt default by raising the statutory limit on the nation’s borrowing. Party leaders have instructed committees to finish writing pieces of the reconciliation package by Sept. 15, though it is unclear whether they will be able to do so.

For now, the deal that Ms. Pelosi struck amounted to a precarious détente for Democrats that did nothing to resolve tensions between the moderate and liberal flanks or end the jockeying for political leverage.

The divisions began to flare this month, when nine centrist Democrats publicly announced that they would not advance the budget blueprint until the House passed the Senate-passed bipartisan infrastructure agreement, which omits many of the party’s highest priorities. Liberals called the compromise insufficient.

Ms. Pelosi had already said she would not move the infrastructure bill, which includes $550 billion in new funding for roads, bridges, water and climate resiliency projects, until the reconciliation bill passed.

That led to a stalemate this week, as Ms. Pelosi called the House back for a rare summer session.

In a series of phone calls and private meetings that stretched past midnight on Monday, Democratic leaders sought to persuade their colleagues to drop their insistence on passing the infrastructure bill first. They did so after securing a hard commitment, enshrined in legislation, that a vote would come on or before Sept. 27.

Ultimately, Ms. Pelosi also pledged that the House would vote only on a reconciliation package that could clear the Senate, sparing moderate lawmakers tough votes on provisions that could never become law.

Representative Stephanie Murphy of Florida, who joined the Democratic holdouts on Monday, said the negotiation showed that centrists were willing to use their sway in the House.

“I think what it is a sign of is that moderates are serious about legislating in a responsible, transparent, inclusive way,” Ms. Murphy said before the vote, adding that she had personally sent a list of proposed changes to Democratic leaders to ensure moderate support.

But the episode was grueling for all involved. Asked early Tuesday whether the agreement was a win for Mr. Gottheimer, Ms. Pelosi responded with an incredulous “a win?”

A weary Representative Jim McGovern of Massachusetts, the chairman of the Rules Committee who convened his panel three times in two days as the talks dragged on, said he had had enough.

“I love you all, but I’m done, and we should move forward and not meet again for a while,” Mr. McGovern told lawmakers on the committee.

Yet despite the potentially messy path ahead, leading Democrats said they were confident that Mr. Biden’s agenda would emerge from Congress intact, even as moderate senators push to rein in the overall price tag.

“Both are going to pass, whatever the sequence,” said Representative Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland, the No. 2 Democrat.

But progressive lawmakers remain concerned that if the reconciliation bill did not go first, provisions addressing climate change, paid family leave, health care and educational opportunity could fall by the wayside, lacking enough support to be enacted into law.


As pressure grows to close Hartford-Brainard Airport, sides in debate see different path to economic development for the century-old airfield.

KENNETH R. GOSSELIN

HARTFORD — As political pressure to close Hartford-Brainard Airport mounts, those who want the century-old airfield to stay open say it could become a strong economic driver all its own, attracting new businesses that help revitalize the city.

All the talk of potential closure, however — the latest this month as the Hartford City Council passed a resolution urging the airport’s closure in favor of redevelopment — is hurting efforts to attract more companies tied to the aviation industry, said Lindsey Rutka, who operates the Hartford Jet Center at Brainard.

Rutka, who has a long-term lease to develop land around the runway, said he’s had multiple conversations with potential companies in recent years that could propel economic development sought by the city, just in a different way.

"This is where I started my dream as a kid to fly," says Air Force veteran Jesse Branche while working on an airplane at V.I.P. Avionics. Branche has been working at the airport for "over 30 years." (Mark Mirko/The Hartford Courant)

“It is very difficult with the city and everyone else, with the lack of support and pressuring to close the airport to have these multiple and thriving businesses willing to come,” Rutka said.

He declined to name the companies he’s been in discussion with, but options range from building on electrical system repair already at Brainard to upholstery and life-preserver manufacturing and even aviation insurance, Rutka said.

But those who are pushing to close the airport see a bigger, regional economic prize: 200 acres prime for redevelopment into housing, entertainment, retail and commercial space and a marina.

The Hartford City Council’s resolution urging a shutdown of Brainard is non-binding, but its members unanimously joined Hartford Mayor Luke Bronin, who first campaigned in 2015 on closing the airport, and state Sen. John W. Fonfara, D-Hartford, an outspoken advocate of closure.

Lindsey Rutka of Hartford Jet Center exits an aircraft hangar at Brainard Airport. The Hartford City Council has passed a non-binding resolution to decommission Brainard. Rutka argues that the airport is in the "heart" of Hartford and vital for the city. He says the uncertainty discourages investment of potential businesses. (Mark Mirko/The Hartford Courant)

Hartford City Councilman James Sanchez said it’s past time for a change in the use of the airfield.

“It is in the best interest of the city of Hartford and the Greater Hartford community, for environmentally-friendly, economic opportunities that will create hundreds, if not thousands of jobs, and we can enjoy our natural resource, which is the Connecticut River,” James Sanchez, the Hartford city councilman who sponsored the closure resolution, said.

Statistics from the Connecticut Airport Authority, which oversees operations at Brainard, paint a sobering picture of the decline in activity at the same airport where Charles Lindbergh launched his 1927 heroes tour after making his transatlantic flight.

Between 2010 and 2020, the annual number of take-off and landings declined by 30%, falling from 71,009 to 49,549, according to the CAA.

Sanchez said there also is now a move to build grassroots support for a closure, as a petition circulates in Hartford among neighborhood revitalization zone organizations, town committees and other community groups.

At the heart of the issue is that Brainard, operated by the quasi-public Connecticut Airport Authority, is largely exempt from local property taxes, barely bringing in $400,000 a year to city coffers. With redevelopment, property taxes could rise to $1.6 million annually, by some estimates, if the airport were in private hands.

Fonfara says the issue is bigger because redevelopment could attract more people — especially young people sought out by employers — to move to not only Hartford but surrounding towns.

Gov. Ned Lamont’s administration said it has a goal of doubling the population of Hartford and other cities in the state, and this would be a step in the right direction, Fonfara said. But it also would benefit the suburbs, he said.

People “will want to live in the region because people can point to this that this is something that you can do here, besides working 9-to-5, whether you are working at home or working at the office,” Fonfara said.

The air traffic control tower at Brainard Airport. (Cloe Poisson, Hartford Courant)

An even larger economic development opportunity for the area may rest in combining the airport property with the neighboring trash burning plant, which is being shut down in 2022, Fonfara said. The cost of environmental cleanup, however, could present a high hurdle in moving forward.

There are no formal plans, but some have been drawn up in the past two decades. Redevelopment would likely take years.

The future of this latest push to close Brainard — an issue debated ever since the 1950s, when a large runway at the airport was taken for redevelopment into what is now Brainard Road — is uncertain.

The CAA, which also oversees four other general aviation airports in the state and the much larger Bradley International Airport, said it does not intend to petition the Federal Aviation Administration to close the airport.

The CAA’s top executive said the CAA does not have millions of dollars it would likely cost, including repaying federal grants, conducting a study to determine if Brainard has outlived its usefulness and the likelihood of claims that would result from tenants who have leases at the airport.

“I certainly recognize the city’s concern here,” Dillon said. “It’s a large piece of property in the city of Hartford, and they are not deriving the tax revenue or the return that they think they should. So, I’m not going to dispute that feeling on their part.”

But Dillon said the CAA has studies that show Brainard does contribute economically to the region. One legislative study in 2016, pegged $43 million in statewide economic activity annually and more than 100 private sector jobs at the airport itself, and recommended future investment.

Critics point to Brainard’s annual operating losses of up to about $500,000, not counting capital contributions from the state that can vary widely year-to-year. But proponents of the airport say operating losses at small airports are not uncommon and are covered by revenue from the federal jet fuel tax.

To make the airport a stronger economic catalyst, the city would have to work with the CAA on reaching a resolution on tree removal and trimming to meet FAA requirements for taking off and landing as well as an extension of the runway.

“It’s got to be one or the other, right?” Dillon said. “Either you have to work with us to try to use this as an economic asset for company relocation and company retention, or, OK, let’s sit down and talk about what is going to be the future of Brainard Airport with the full understanding that the CAA is not in a position to close it.”

Dillon said one alternative could be the state condemning the property, but that, too, would be a costly undertaking.

Those who oppose Brainard say it is mostly the domain of recreational users. And while that is partly true — there are three flight schools based at the airport — Rutka said the generalization ignores other functions of the airport.

Brainard is a hub for public safety aircraft, including homeland security; it is integral to the transport of organ donations; and it is often a stop for performers at such venues as the Xfinity Theater, Rutka said.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Marc Diwinsky, president of the 36-member Connecticut Flight Club, based at Brainard, said it isn’t practical to simply relocate the smaller single- and twin-engine airplanes to Bradley, just 15 miles away in Windsor Locks. For one, it is much more expensive.

“Bradley is too busy,” Diwinsky said. “There is just too much going on there.”

Diwinsky said Brainard also is just the right size for air transportation that may seem fanciful right now — air taxis, electric-powered airplanes, even flying cars. (A flying car is being developed and tested in Europe.)

Alternatives to more traditional modes of transportation may make it easier to commute longer distances by air in the future but still live in the Hartford area, Diwinsky said.

“Eventually, we are going to have flying cars, other ways of getting around, and airports are going to be a vital asset, Diwinsky said. “You’re not just going to take off in your yard.”