November 13, 2024

CT Construction Digest Wednesday November 13, 2024

Lamont joins CT, city officials to celebrate reopening of Derby-Shelton Bridge

Brian Gioiele

SHELTON — Derby-Shelton Bridge rehabilitation is done, a sign of the continued investment in this Valley corridor which city and state officials said is a hub for economic development. 

Gov. Ned Lamont, state DOT Commissioner Garrett Eucalitto, Shelton Mayor Mark Lauretti, Derby Mayor Joseph L. DiMartino, former Valley United Way chair and Derby Historical Society head Jack Walsh and a host of state legislators braved a stiff wind Tuesday morning to celebrate the reopening of the bridge connecting downtown Derby and Shelton. Work on the project began three years ago. 

“I welcome this day to be able to stand on this bridge and understand the prospects created by this upgrade,” Lauretti said. 

Lauretti went on to thank the state DOT and Lamont for his administration’s ongoing financial support, which has helped further spur economic growth in the two Valley communities, he said. 

"With projects like this, the Valley will continue to be the economic engine for the state of Connecticut for years to come,” Lauretti said. 

The renovation work began in 2021. The final cost to rehabilitate the bridge stands at $12.4 million — 80 percent of which was funded by the federal government. State money covered the remaining 20 percent. The original estimated project cost was $10.3 million. 

“This is such a historic bridge,” said state Rep. Jason Perillo, who worked with fellow state Rep. Nicole Klarides-Ditria and former representatives Themis Klarides and Linda Gentile to obtain the initial funding for the work.  

"This is a wonderful job restoring a beautiful bridge,” Perillo said. “This matters, and it is a great example how communities can work together with the governor, cities and state agencies to make things happen.” 

The contract was awarded to Mohawk Northeast, Inc. Construction. The project design was performed by AECOM under contract with the Naugatuck Valley Council of Governments. 

The project was designed to create an aesthetically pleasing public space along the Derby-Shelton Bridge and provide a gateway that is pedestrian and bicycle friendly to the downtown areas, according to NVCOG Executive Director Rick Dunne. 

Details included the replacement of bridge parapet walls, the removal of existing lighting and replacement with period-style light, colored LED “up-lighting” that will accent the archways and parapets from below the bridge, a second travel lane for traffic heading to Derby, new pavement and curbing, shifting of the travel lanes to accommodate wider sidewalks on the south side of the bridge and a cycle track. 

“I love the care that went into this,” said Lamont, surveying the bridge. “People want to live in the Valley. They are coming back, and this is all coming to life. This bridge is symbolic of this growth.” 

The Derby-Shelton Bridge project also connects with the existing Housatonic Riverwalk trail network in Shelton and the Naugatuck River Greenway in Derby. 

“This is the connection between two towns, the connection of the two greenways,” said Dunne, “But it is also connecting the historic industrial waterfronts that populated this area in the 19th century and really made it strong.” 

Dunne praised the Lamont administration’s investments in projects such as the bridge, the Waterbury rail line and the Derby Shelton Train Station as key to spurring further economic expansion in the two Valley communities. 

"The Valley is the future for affordable housing in Connecticut,” said Dunne. “Look up and down the Valley. This is the anchor of thousands of units constructed, under development or approved on the drawing board for the future.” 

Lauretti, during his comments, recognized former Derby Mayor Anthony Staffieri, who was in the crowd of media and spectators at the bridge opening celebration. 

“We initiated this project years ago, because we saw a need for a change," Lauretti said. "We saw the changing face of our downtown areas and the economic opportunities that would be created by this work.” 

Walsh praised the renovation work before describing the bridge’s history, which began in 1831 when it was a simple wooden structure. 

That bridge washed away in 1857 and was then rebuilt by private developers who charged a toll to help pay for the construction, Walsh said. 

"This bridge has been and will continue to be critical to the financial success of whole Valley,” Walsh said. 

Through the years, Walsh said there have been several bridges that spanned the Housatonic River between Shelton and Derby — from covered bridges to iron bridges to the current concrete bridge, which dates to 1918. 

The Derby–Shelton Bridge used to carry two streetcar tracks until the 1930s. Part of that history was discovered in 2022 during the construction phase of the rehabilitation project. 

According to the Derby section of the old Electronic Valley website, the trolley line dates to 1887 and the creation of the Derby Street Railway Co., which focused on building an electric trolley line mainly to haul freight between the Derby docks and the industrial center of Ansonia on upper Main Street. 

The Shelton Economic Development Commission, aided by a grant from the Derby-Shelton Rotary Club, was able to secure $265,000 to conduct a study that ultimately resulted in the current state bridge reconstruction project, according to former Rotary President Kate Marks. 



DOT’s $106 million upgrades to stations along Waterbury line to begin in 2025

LIVI STANFORD 

WATERBURY – The state Department of Transportation is planning $106 million in infrastructure upgrades at the Waterbury, Beacon Falls, Seymour, Ansonia and Derby-Shelton train stations along Metro-North’s Waterbury line, with construction beginning in 2025.

The improvements will be funded with a combination of federal and state money, and about $3 million is expected to go toward renovation of the southern part of the Republican-American building at Waterbury station. That project will include an indoor waiting area with seating and restrooms for travelers. There also will be private offices for station employees.

Mayor Paul K. Pernerewski Jr. noted there have been improvements to train service out of Waterbury and ridership has gone up, but people still wait outside for the trains and are subject to the weather. The renovations will enable people to wait inside, providing an “improved experience,” the mayor said.

Construction is expected to occur between 2025 and 2027, DOT spokesman Josh Morgan said.

“Making upgrades to stations along the line will improve the rider experience,” he said. “It could also draw future investments into those communities through transit-oriented development.”

Morgan said the upgrades are focused on modernizing stations with longer platforms, canopies, parking lot improvements, and adding bathrooms and passenger seating to waiting areas on the main level and some staffing offices on the second level.

State Rep. Geraldo Reyes, D-75th District, said the improvements are a long time coming.

“For the ridership that had the No. 1 volume during COVID, it stands to reason why this infrastructure investment has been made,” he said. “It opens up the opportunity to get more commuters going back to New York and vice versa, whether for work or education. I am excited the day is here.”

State Rep. Ron Napoli, D-73rd District, said the infrastructure upgrades are a necessity.

“Any upgrades we can make will improve (people’s) quality of life,” he said.

DOT will hold two public information meetings to discuss the planned improvements. The first will take place Monday at 6 p.m. at Waterbury City Hall, 235 Grand St., in Veterans Memorial Hall on the second floor. The second is set for Tuesday at 6 p.m. at Ansonia Senior Center, 65 Main St.


How a Connecticut company is turning used bottles into schools and skyscrapers

John Moritz

BEACON FALLS — Inside of an old stone fabrication plant alongside the Naugatuck River, thousands of tons of glass from millions of discarded soda and beer bottles are being ground down until they reach a fine dust. Dust that can build skyscrapers. 

The dust — sold under the trademark brand Pozzotive — is a cement alternative developed by Urban Mining Industries and manufactured at the company’s first-of-its-kind facility in Connecticut, where recycled glass is cleaned, crushed and milled before being distributed to nearby plants to be mixed into concrete.

Concrete mixed with Pozzotive has been used in hundreds of building projects around the tri-state area and further afield since Urban Mining opened its Beacon Falls facility in 2021. Previously, the company operated a pilot plant in New York beginning in 2009.

Among those projects is the 60-story JP Morgan Chase Building under construction in Manhattan — and scheduled for completion in 2025 — which utilized the equivalent of roughly 20 million discarded glass bottles in the concrete for its massive floor slabs and building blocks. 

Gov. Ned Lamont toured the Beacon Falls plant on Tuesday, following the announcement of a $37 million matching grant from the U.S. Department of Energy for Urban Mining to build two new, larger facilities in Florida and Maryland, allowing the company to expand its reach down the East Coast.

Urban Mining leases its current plant from partner O&G Industries, a Torrington-based construction firm that also utilizes Pozzotive at all eight of its concrete plants in Connecticut. 

“The whole process, this whole manufacturing enterprise, is a Connecticut start-up,” said Bill Stanley, the vice president of the materials division at O&G Industries. 

Unlike traditional cement — which is made from limestone or clay that is melted down under extreme heat — Pozzotive can be made entirely from post-consumer glass that comes from nearby material recovery facilities in New York and Connecticut.

The resulting product uses 94 percent less carbon emissions than a comparable amount of cement, according to Urban Mining. (Pozzotive can replace up to half of the cement used in concrete, though the amount varies depending on the project, the company said). 

Patrick Grasso, the principal at Urban Mining, said the idea for Pozzotive came about from efforts to distinguish his family’s concrete block business in upstate New York by experimenting with new materials. The company’s website credits Grosso’s nephew, Louis Grasso, Jr., as the lead inventor of Pozzotive. 

”It was an invention of necessity,” Patrick Grasso said. “What was at time really a focus on recycled content evolved to low-concrete concrete solutions. This kind of does both.”

Asked whether he feared that a potential shift away from climate-conscious practices under another Donald Trump administration would hurt companies like Urban Mining, Lamont said he was optimistic about its prospects. 

“I think a President Trump would like this, don’t you?” Lamont said. “The guy builds a lot of buildings, he buys a lot of concrete, this is the type of thing he could identify with.” 

In Connecticut, Pozzotive has been used to construct schools, libraries, a new digital studio at the ESPN campus in Bristol as well as the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection’s new Western District Headquarters — the last of which required roughly 346,000 bottles, according to O&G Industries, project’s concrete supplier. 

During the tour on Tuesday, Grasso also spoke to Lamont about including guidance around the use of low carbon, locally-sourced materials into the state’s green building standards as a way of incentivizing the use of Pozzotive. 

Lamont offered to look into the matter — the regulations are set by DEEP — before sharing his own thoughts on the product. “I love what you guys are doing,” he said over the din of the mill. 

In addition to utilizing less carbon during the manufacturing process, high-performance concrete mixed with Pozzotive is also more resistant to salt corrosion, according to Stanley, resulting in a longer lifespan for road projects. 

“The plan is to try and take this on a more national scale,” Grasso said. “Certain regions are more focused on sustainability and low-carbon concrete, and they seem to tend a little bit more toward the East and West Coast, and so those will probably be some of the earlier markets we focus on.”


This 46-acre property in CT could become a solar farm

KURT MOFFETT 

WINSTED – A 46-acre property at 132 Spencer Hill Road could become home to a solar farm.

The undeveloped land was purchased by Vineyard Sky Farms Corp. in February for $860,000

In recent months, tree cutting has occurred and town officials said they were receiving inquiries about what was going on there.

Zoning enforcement officer Geoffrey M. Green said the project manager for the property, Rodney Galton, contacted him and told him the long-term plan is for a solar farm, but for now it is going to be a grazing area. Green said Vineyard Sky has not yet applied to the Connecticut Siting Council, which has jurisdiction over the location of power facilities, transmission lines, hazardous waste sites, and telecommunication towers and antennas.

Green noted there has been some “confusion” over the Vineyard Sky property and an adjacent site that already received approval from the Siting Council for a solar farm. The 16-acre parcel does not have an address but is in the area of 140-142 Spencer Hill Road.

The council in February approved a proposal for the development and construction of a 3.74-megawatt, ground-mounted solar array from Greenskies Energy. The project calls for the installation of about 8,200 individual panels, which should generate 5.9 million kilowatt hours per year, enough to power 350 to 450 typical homes.

No work, however, has begun on the Greenskies project, Green said. The plan is for Greenskies to lease 16 acres from the 190 acres owned by Frank Ahern and Karen Merete. The property consists of forest, wetlands and a pasture/hayfield.

Meanwhile, Vineyard Sky is allowed to cut the trees down because it owns the property and is only opening up more space for grazing, an agricultural use of the property, Green said. He took written guidance from the Hartford-based Halloran and Sage law firm in determining that the tree cutting did not violate state law or local regulations, he said.

“Clear cutting has generally been defined to mean the removal of substantially all of the trees, bushes and wooded vegetation within a particular area,” Halloran and Sage wrote. “Selective cutting, even a majority of the timber, is an exempt activity. … Agricultural crop land would include hay fields and land on which animals are to graze, in addition to land on which crops are cultivated for harvest.”

Green said the property has “historically been farmland, but Vineyard Sky does not have a zoning farm permit. So even though the use could be considered pre-existing, I have advised them to pull a farming permit, which should close any questions as to the allowable activity of harvesting timber to open up additional grazing fields.”


Two large apartment projects planned for Route 32 in Montville

Daniel Drainville

Montville ― The town has received applications for two projects that would construct a total of 257 apartments on Route 32.

When the Planning and Zoning Commission meets on Dec. 10, it is expected to set a public hearing date for the two projects.

The first project calls for a four-story mixed-income apartment building on Route 32 across from Fort Shantok Road. West Hartford-based developer Honeycomb Real Estate Partners, LLC, has submitted an application for the project, along with site plans a traffic study and drainage report.

According to the plans, Horizon View would contain 57 apartments, including 25 one-bedroom units and 32 two-bedroom units. Twenty percent would be rented at market rate, while the other 80 percent would be reserved for people making up to 80% of the area median income.

The apartment building would be constructed on 3.4 acres of vacant land.

According to a letter from project attorney William Sweeney to Planning and Zoning Chairperson Sara Lundy, Honeycomb has an agreement to buy the land.

An entrance would be built directly across from Fort Shantok Road, creating a four-way intersection. The traffic report states 259 vehicles would leave and enter the property each day.

The developer’s traffic engineer, Roy Smith, wrote in the report that the project would not have a significant impact on traffic. The project would have 132 parking spots.

A sidewalk would be built along the southbound side of Route 32, which would be connected by an existing crosswalk to a sidewalk on the northbound side.

The second project calls for five four-story apartment buildings on 12.9 acres of vacant land on Norwich-New London Turnpike across the street from the Tantaquidgeon Museum. It would contain 200 units.

East Hartford-based Four Seasons Construction has submitted plans for the project known as Shantok Village, along with reports on traffic impact and drainage and a letter from the state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection stating there are no endangered species on the site.

Plans also call for a 3,500-square-foot community center and 408 parking spots. A traffic report prepared for the developer states the impact of the project on Route 32 “will be limited.” Between 74 and 78 vehicles will leave or enter the project during peak hours, according to the report.


Construction starting on $27M affordable housing project in New Haven

Hanna Snyder Gambini

City officials on Tuesday marked the start of construction on The Monarch, an affordable multifamily development in New Haven’s West River neighborhood.

Being developed by Honeycomb Real Estate Partners, the 64-unit building will be located at the site of the former New England Linen company, at 149 and 169 Derby Ave.

The industrial laundry facility dates back to 1900 and was known as Monarch Cleaners. 

The $27 million project is being funded in part by a 4% federal low-income tax credit through the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority, a $500,000 brownfields grant from the Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development, and $500,000 from American Rescue Plan Act money.

The old building was razed, and the 1.77-acre site was remediated and will soon be home to a mix of one-, two- and three-bedroom apartments. Most units, 47, will rent at 60% of the area median income, with 13 units at 50% AMI and four units at 80%.
 
This project is one of the latest multifamily housing developments on vacant or abandoned sites throughout the city. Since 2020, more than 2,000 new housing units have been built in the Elm City and an additional 3,500 new units are currently in the pipeline, of which an estimated 40% are affordable.


How will a second Trump administration affect transportation policy?

Dan Zukowski

Former President Donald Trump will become the next president of the United States. Following the Biden administration, which put billions of dollars into Amtrak, high-speed rail, public transportation and the transition to electric vehicles and buses, what might change under the incoming administration?

On transportation policy that affects cities and states nationwide, Trump has a mixed record. In his first term, he proposed a trillion-dollar infrastructure plan that never came to fruition. He repeatedly tried and failed to cut funding for Amtrak’s long-distance trains and attempted to take back nearly $3.5 billion in already-awarded federal grants for the California high-speed rail project to connect Los Angeles and San Francisco. Instead, the first Trump administration largely favored highway expansion projects.

Smart Cities Dive asked experts Wednesday morning for their thoughts on how the second Trump administration could affect forthcoming transportation policy impacting U.S. cities.

“The Trump administration in the past and the Republican Party’s general approach has been to advocate for significant cuts in public transportation,” said Yonah Freemark, research director of the Land Use Lab at Urban Institute. He added that pursuing those policies next year “could be absolutely devastating for urban transit systems.”

Federal grant programs under the Trump administration will likely focus on roads and rural areas, marking a big shift from the Biden administration’s prioritization of transit, cyclists and pedestrians, Freemark said.

However, rural Americans want more trains, not less, some rail advocates say. Staff from the Rail Passengers Association have traveled across the country over the last two years in an effort to bring back discontinued train routes, and “we’ve heard from rural communities that they feel disconnected and left behind,” said Sean Jeans-Gail, RPA vice president of government affairs and policy.

The previous Trump administration blocked funding for the Gateway project in New York and New Jersey to build a new two-track tunnel and rehabilitate the existing tunnels under the Hudson River that carry Amtrak intercity trains and New Jersey Transit commuter trains. The project began construction this year under the Biden administration.

“Investing in infrastructure has always had bipartisan support, and President-elect Trump has promised to strengthen America’s economy,” the Regional Plan Association said in an email statement. “Delaying these capital investments only drives up their costs and weakens our economy. We will be looking to our delegation and leadership in the House and Senate to continue these investments.”

Trump opposes New York’s plan to toll drivers entering Manhattan at or below 60th street, which would generate needed funds for subways, buses and commuter trains. He vowed May 24 on social media to “TERMINATE Congestion Pricing in my FIRST WEEK back in Office!!!” The plan has been on hold since New York Gov. Kathy Hochul ordered an indefinite pause to implementing congestion pricing on June 5.

In an email statement on Wednesday, Riders Alliance Policy and Communications Director Danny Pearlstein urged the governor to reverse her stance before Trump is inaugurated. “Governor Hochul must race against time to secure the money New Yorkers need to fix our aging subway and protect riders from climate change,” he said.

The Biden administration put forth a major effort to support the transition to electric vehicles, including a $5 billion program to create a network of EV charging stations every 50 miles along the interstate highway system or within one mile of an interstate exit, and federal incentives for electric vehicle buyers.

But “all EV policies are on the table” with the incoming administration, said Genevieve Cullen, president of the Electric Drive Transportation Association. “What will hopefully emerge from the fog of campaign rhetoric is when folks take a closer look at these EV policies, they’ll understand more clearly what the impact on investment and jobs in the United States are, and how consumers are benefiting and communities are benefiting,” she said.

More clarity on the incoming president’s policies will emerge in the coming months.


November 11, 2024

CT Construction Digest Monday November 11, 2024

A $335M federal courthouse will be built in Hartford. Officials want the public's input on a location

Alex Wood

HARTFORD — Officials have narrowed the sites they are considering for a new federal courthouse in Hartford to two, a 2.2-acre Allyn Street parking lot and a 10.2-acre site at the corner of Asylum Avenue and Woodland Street now occupied by 74-year-old state government office building.

The U.S. General Services Administration has issued a 381-page draft Environmental Impact Statement on the courthouse project, for which Congress has appropriated $335 million. The GSA is seeking public input on the siting issue at a hearing Wednesday and in written comments that can be submitted until Dec. 16.

The U.S. District Court would move its Hartford operations to the new building from the Abraham A. Ribicoff federal building and courthouse at 450 Main St.

The court areas of the Ribicoff building, named for a former Connecticut U.S. senator, governor and U.S. representative, are spacious compared to many state courthouses, such as the criminal courthouse at 101 Lafayette St. in Hartford.

But the draft environmental statement says, “For the past several years, the Federal Judiciary Courthouse Project Priorities List included the identification of a new courthouse in Hartford as a top priority across the country.”

One of the Ribicoff building’s shortcomings is that it “does not have adequate blast protection setbacks from the adjoining streets,” the draft statement says.

Another is that it lacks separate corridors for movement of prisoners, meaning that U.S. Marshals have to escort them to and from court through public areas, the draft says.

Not enough space

And a third shortcoming, according to the draft, is that it just does not have enough space for the court’s anticipated needs. The Ribicoff building has eight courtrooms and 10 judges, the draft says, while a new courthouse would have 11 courtrooms and 18 judges’ chambers, expected to meet needs for 30 years.

The headquarters of Connecticut’s U.S. District Court would be moved to the new courthouse from the Richard C. Lee Courthouse across the street from the New Haven Green. In addition, some judges, staff and other personnel would be moved from the federal courthouses in New Haven and Bridgeport to the new Hartford courthouse, the draft says.

The Allyn Street site is a parking lot a block north of Bushnell Park, bounded by Allyn, High and Church streets, with mixed-use buildings and St. Patrick-St. Anthony Roman Catholic Church filling the rest of the block to Ann Uccello Street.

The site is between Union Station and the XL Center and is very near the William R. Cotter Federal Building. The building envisioned for the Allyn Street site would include two levels of secure underground parking, the draft says.

“There appears to be adequate public parking in proximity to the Allyn Site, however, GSA may pursue options to provide additional parking such as entering into a lease with a commercial parking operator,” it continues.

Too much parking in Hartford?

One advantage cited for the Allyn Street site is that it would eliminate some of Hartford’s excess parking space.

The draft says the city “has approximately twice as much downtown parking relative to the average U.S. city, and as a result, the city is encouraging different development patterns in the downtown area.”

The other site under consideration, on the southwest corner of Asylum Avenue and Woodland Street, is now occupied by a six-story structure built in 1950 for the Phoenix Insurance Co. and renovated by the state in 1974 for use as Greater Hartford Community College, the draft says. Its address is 61 Woodland St., and multiple state agencies now use it, the draft adds.

The draft says the existing buildings on the site may be demolished or re-used. The secure parking needed for a courthouse may be underground or surface-level, the draft says.

There are several parking lots on the site, and the draft says, “GSA would incorporate some of the existing surface parking into its landscape plan. GSA would pursue options to provide additional parking such as entering into a lease with a commercial parking operator.”

The site borders the North Branch of the Park River, and one of the lower parking lots has a sign warning of flooding.

“Construction would be limited to areas outside the floodplain,” the draft says.

Other options scrapped

Possibilities that were considered earlier but have been rejected include a site straddling Hudson Street between Capitol Avenue and Buckingham Street, and renovation of the Ribicoff building.

As to the renovation options, the draft says, Ribicoff building tenants not affiliated with the court would need to be removed temporarily to provide “swing space” for the court during the project, which would involve “major structural work.”

In addition, it says, the court would need to remain in operation during multiple phases of construction, hampering the ability of the U.S. Marshal Service “to keep all parties safe and secure throughout the extensive renovation project.”

Wednesday’s public hearing is to run from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. at The Lyceum Center, Conference Center 1, 227 Lawrence St., Hartford.

Written comments can be submitted at the hearing, emailed to HartfordCourthouse@GSA.gov, put in a drop box at the main entrance to the Ribicoff building, or mailed to General Services Administration, Attn.: Robert Herman, Project Manager, Abraham A. Ribicoff Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 450 Main St., Suite 435, Hartford, CT 06103.


Naugatuck moves forward with downtown revitalization

 ANDREAS YILMA 

NAUGATUCK – The borough is paving the way to finish remediation and develop Parcel B downtown.

The Board of Mayor and Burgesses last Wednesday approved a work order for Parcel B, Phase 1 construction services and Phase 2 design services in the amount of $42,920.

Pennrose, a real estate development company from Philadelphia, and Cloud Co. of Hartford are set to develop 7.75 acres at the corner of Maple Street and Old Firehouse Road, known as Parcel B. The development is broken into three phases that will include three four-story buildings with 60 units in each structure, consisting of 29 one-bedroom and 31 two-bedroom units.

Phase 1 would be closest to Maple Street, phase two closest to the Naugatuck Event Center, which is also being repurposed into another apartment complex, and phase three in the middle as Department of Transportation would need staging area for the new proposed train station that is expected to move from near The Station Restaurant to the middle of Parcel B.

“This is for the remediation soil stability work that’s being done on Parcel B, Phase 1 of the Pennrose (project),” public works Director Jim Stewart said.

The borough board also approved to enter into an agreement with Down-To-Earth Consulting for an amount not to exceed $155,200 for environmental services for remediation of Parcel B.

The town previously received a $1.3 million Department of Economic and Community Development grant for the downtown revitalization project which will cover the costs of remediation, Stewart said.

Part of this work will also help with the foundation of the property.

“This is essentially the digging of the foundation and the utility areas for Pennrose, Phase 1,” Mayor N. Warren “Pete” Hess said.

The work from Down-To-Earth Consulting will include supplying inspection services, testing and asbestos air monitoring during the period and remedial action plan for the DOT property, Stewart said.

“This is one of many moving parts in the project and we received a grant and our grant is covering all of our costs, Hess said.

Deputy Rocky Vitale inquired about any voids underneath the property that may have to be addressed.

“Right now we’re doing the extension of Rubber Avenue,” Stewart said. “We hit one of the tunnels which we knew were there and they excavated it out and they’re filling it back in with soil.”

Hess said the borough collapsed a tunnel and are filling it in which will be used partly form the Connecticut Communities Challenge grant and the town TIF money for the construction of Rubber Ave.

“They are excavating for the foundation for the Pennrose building and processing the material and putting it back in there compact so they can build a building on top of it and they’re also going through the utility corridors and doing the same thing so that when they dig, everything’s easier and they’re not going hit anything on the,” Stewart said.

The voids or tunnels mainly on Phase 2 of the Pennrose project haven’t been addressed yet, Hess said.

The Zoning Commission continued a hearing to Nov. 20 for the special permit application for phase two of the proposed residential and commercial development for the property at 90 Old Firehouse Road. It did approve the architectural renderings for phases one and two of the buildings and a revised landscaping plan for phase one.

The commission previously approved a special permit for Phase 1 of the transit-oriented project at the end of 2022. Construction for phase one is expected to begin next year.


Stamford's much-delayed Cedar Heights Road bridge built too low and now needs fixing, officials say

Tyler Fedor

STAMFORD — The completion date of a project to rebuild a bridge on Cedar Heights Road has been pushed back, again.More

The goal was to get the bridge, rated in “Serious” condition by the Connecticut Department of Transportation, rebuilt by the end of November after a string of delays. However, City Engineer Lou Casolo said the hope now is to open the bridge to traffic by April 2025 after it was discovered the new bridge was built too low.

Tony Vitti, president of A. Vitti Excavators, which is building the bridge, said his company will pay to fix the height discrepancy. 

Completing the project any later could delay replacement of a bridge on Wire Mill Road, which is completely supported by federal funds. Tthe Wire Mill Road project must be completed by the end of 2025 or those federal funds could be reduced or revoked, Casolo said.

“There can't be any hiccups,” Casolo said.

Cedar Heights Road, which is just south of the Merritt Parkway, has been closed to traffic during the project. A detour takes cars along High Ridge Road and Wire Mill Road. 

Bids were put out for contractors to take on the Wire Mill Road project with a commitment from the city to get work started on it April 1. 

Casolo said both bridges cannot be closed at the same time. 

“It would be a real impact to the city,” Casolo said. “That would be a problem.”

Casolo previously told The Stamford Advocate that about 3,800 vehicles passed over the Cedar Heights bridge on a daily basis before it closed.

Casolo said A. Vitti Excavators will work through the winter to make sure the replacement for the more-than-90-year-old bridge on Cedar Heights Road can be completed. 

He described the time the contractor for the Wire Mill Road project will have to complete the project, including filing paperwork, getting materials and building, as “razor thin,” even if the the bridge on Cedar Heights Road is completed by April. 

Board of Representatives member Don Mays, D-19, called the most recent delay “an embarrassment for the city” in an Operations Committee meeting. He also critiqued the contractor for having to go through multiple rounds of review for permits and approvals.  

“It tells me that the contractor may be unfamiliar with the requirements of the job or is perhaps a bit over his head,” Mays said. 

Vitti said the delays were the fault of third-party contractors that took too long to sign off on designs and permits.

“I'm getting punished and they're dragging their feet on submittals,” Vitti said.  

The original goal was to complete the project by Nov. 30, 2023. A. Vitti Excavators then committed to working during the 2023 winter to get the job done by May 31. That was also pushed back to June 30

The completion date was then pushed back to the end of November after A. Vitti Excavators submitted documents on how it would handle the flow of the Rippowam River, demolition of the bridge and supporting utility lines to an inspection firm before moving from one stage of construction to the next. 

The documents went through multiple rounds of reviews that resulted in more delays.


Southington Public Library readies for big move; opening of new building scheduled for early December

 Ciara Hooks

SOUTHINGTON— The Southington Public Library is almost ready for the community to enjoy an improved experience as it moves into a new state-of-the-art building in the next few weeks. 

The move from the current library location at 255 Main St. to the nearly 30,000-square-foot new building next door will begin on Nov. 18, with the reopening scheduled for Dec. 2.

“Just please plan accordingly,” said Town Manager Alex Ricciardone during the Oct. 17 Town Council meeting. “And we're waiving all fees. So, no need to worry.” 

The Library Building Committee had planned an original opening date of Nov. 28 or even a little sooner but decided to hold off until after the Thanksgiving holiday weekend, according to Town Council Vice Chair Jim Morelli. 

But except for minor delays involving fixtures, completion of the new construction is on schedule.

“I have been part of five library renovations, and I can say that this process has been transparent, collaborative, professional and efficient," said Southington Public Library and Barnes Museum Executive Director Thomas Piezzo. "I greatly appreciate the efforts, and this has truly been a team effort of which I am glad to have been a part. The whole team has been mutually supportive, and the results will speak for themselves.” 

As of early October, crews were finishing built-in bookcases and running wiring. Some of the glass doors were installed last week, and once the rest come in, they will also be installed.

“I think the architect (DRA) and the building manager (Whiting-Turner) did a phenomenal job," Morelli said. "They worked really well together for the town, and Turner managed the budget like it was their own money. They were able to really get a lot more things into the building than we thought we would originally, and it's still all on budget.” 

The new building will have two floors incorporating different color schemes, including pastel blue, navy blue, and off-white.  The first floor will include a program room, circulation workroom, lobby, friends' workroom, book sales, and more. The second floor will have an information office, teen room, study areas, books, and seating. 

“The place looks fantastic; it really does,” Morelli said. “The colors blend well, and there's a lot of natural light in the building, which was by design. It's a beautiful facility.” 

The current library location will be shut down for about two weeks to accommodate the move to the new building. The lower level and mezzanine will be closed beginning Tuesday to prepare for the start of the move on Nov. 18. Morelli said a professional mover was hired without going over the budget.

No books should be dropped in the book drop or donations left during this time, and items checked out after Nov. 15 through the temporary closing are due Dec. 5. 

The library’s address will remain 255 Main St. and reopen to the public on Dec. 2. All fees will be due starting on Dec. 5. 

“I think this is a pretty monumental project,” Morelli said. “I'm very proud of the building. I think the residents will be really proud of it, too. I think they'll use it a lot, which is great. It was designed to be flexible, modular, and really usable for the public for the long haul, and I think it's a great addition to our town."  

Construction began in July 2023 after Southington voters approved a $16.9 million referendum in 2021 to fund construction of the new library and demolition of the existing facility.

The library board organized a capital campaign to raise funds for furniture, fixtures, and equipment. The campaign's goal was $1 million. In August, the campaign entered its public phase giving community members the opportunity to be recognized for their support of the project with their name on a plaque to be displayed in the new building as well as on benches, study areas, and rooms. Customized bricks will be installed on the patio next spring.

“We were able to reach our goal, and all public spaces have the new furniture, fixtures, and equipment needed,” Piezzo said. “And staff furniture, which is in good condition, will be reused.”

An official ribbon cutting for the new library facility is tentatively scheduled for Dec. 7.


Garfield Mills owner expects to begin apartment construction in coming weeks

John Penney

New London ― The owner of a dilapidated, long-vacant former mill property said he expects to begin turning the sprawling structure into apartment units before Thanksgiving.

Ted Lazarus, a principal of the Litchfield-based Park Lane Group, said Friday remediation at 90 Garfield Ave., former home to the Edward Bloom Silk Co business, is about 90% complete and he expects construction of 87 apartments ― 20% of which will be set aside as affordable housing ― to be finished by the first quarter of 2026.

The Park Lane Group, operating as Garfield Mills LLC, bought the 97,000-square-foot mill building, which has sat unused for decades, for $239,000 in 2019.

The company, with the aid of a $1 million state brownfield remediation grant, began cleaning the property about eight months ago. Lazarus said the former factory was rife with contaminants, including lead-painted walls and chemical-laden caulk in window sealants.

“But we’re in good shape and are enormously excited for the next steps,” Lazarus said.

In addition to the state’s contribution, the city has also extended its support in the form of a $2.16 million tax break agreement approved by the City Council in October 2023.

Garfield Mills will pay an annual tax bill of $20,000 for the first four years of the 20-year agreement during the construction phase, with those amounts increasing by 2.5% annually in most subsequent years.

The city currently collects about $20,000 in annual taxes from the building and 3.5-acre site but officials anticipate that figure will jump significantly after its redevelopment.

If the mill site remained unused, the city could expect to take in $510,893 in taxes from the property over a two-decade period. But that figure leaps to $1.3 million when the project, with its anticipated $4.8 million assessment, is completed, Finance Director David McBride previously said.

The city, in exchange for signing the agreement, will get a new housing complex expected to spur economic improvements in the surrounding area.

The mill, also known locally as the Faria Mill, is located in the city’s Tax Increment Financing Garfield Mills District, an incentive zone created by the council in 2022 that allows a portion of any increase in tax revenues from rising property values to be set aside for infrastructure improvements in that area.

Under that plan, 50% of tax revenue realized by increases in assessed value in the district will be “recycled” back into the neighborhood for various improvement projects, including new sidewalks, parks and lighting, with the remainder funneled into the city’s general fund.

Felix Reyes, the city’s director of planning and economic development, described the former mill – and the surrounding block – as an almost textbook case of blight.

“It’s been a long, drawn-out process with the remediation at that brownfield site, which was a factory for a long time,” he said on Friday. “But it’s encouraging to hear they plan to start construction in the near future.”


November 7, 2024

CT Construction Digest Thursday November 7, 2024

Waterbury OKs developer's wetlands plan for Amazon warehouse on 'virgin land'

Alexander Soule

Officials with the Waterbury Inland Wetlands Commission approved developer Bluewater Property Group's plan to build an Amazon fulfillment center on the Naugatuck line, after hearing opposition from a handful of residents with environmental concerns.

More than 50 people turned out for the hearing at Waterbury City Hall on Wednesday night, with the Naugatuck Inland Wetlands Commission having scheduled a similar hearing for Thursday.

In Waterbury, a handful of area residents took the opportunity to criticize the plan for the impact the 650,000-square-foot warehouse would have on the environment and wildlife like box turtles, during both construction and regular operation.

Located on a wooded hilltop in the Waterbury-Naugatuck Industrial Park just off Route 8, the Amazon facility would support between 500 and 1,000 jobs depending on seasonal needs, along with construction jobs as the fulfillment center gets built. Several members of Connecticut State Building Trades unions attended in a show of support for the project.

"The people who will be employed obviously will be in this community," said Joshua Garofano, a Bluewater vice president who spoke at the hearing. "They'll go to all the supermarkets and the gas stations and ... the mom-and-pop businesses."

Naugatuck Mayor Pete Hess has projected that taxes from the Amazon fulfillment center would add about $2.5 million in revenue for each city. 

But area residents pressed Inland Wetlands Commission officials on Wednesday to consider the impact on nearby residential neighborhoods, and on some 15 acres of wetlands and water runoff from the 105-acre parcel.

"This is a major impact to the city of Waterbury," said Christopher Casey, a retired paramedic, funeral home director and commissioner of the Waterbury Fire Department who lives near the site. "It's virgin land. I played in there when I was a kid."

Inland wetlands commission hearings were tabled last month in both Waterbury and Naugatuck to allow city consultant Tighe & Bond to analyze a site plan filed by Bluewater Property Group, a 1,200-page document that had been prepared by Langan Engineering of New Haven. Waterbury city planner Bob Nerney said that Langan and Bluewater had incorporated several suggested changes by Tighe & Bond to meet city requirements for the project.

Samuel Leisring, chairman of the Waterbury Inland Wetlands Commission, told CT Insider that he was uncertain of any next steps for the city if his counterparts in Naugatuck turn down the application.

"I would assume it goes back to the drawing board," Leisring said.


Trumbull residents approve constructing a new Hillcrest Middle School with over 13,000 "yes" votes 

Shaniece Holmes-Brown

TRUMBULL — Residents can look forward to the construction of a new Hillcrest Middle School after a majority of residents voted to approve it Tuesday.

Unofficial results from the Registrar of Voters Office show the town's referendum ballot question get over 13,000 "yes" votes. The Hillcrest project costs approximately $142,375,000.

"I was very excited to learn that the Trumbull community showed overwhelming support for the new Hillcrest Middle School," said Superintendent Martin Semmel Wednesday afternoon. "This has been a collaborative effort with our elected officials, our staff, our parents and our students."

The town website announced the approval Wednesday afternoon.

"The Town Council has already created a building committee to plan and oversee the project. The building committee can now commence work on the project," the post said.

Democratic Registrar of Voters Jean Rabinow shared the unofficial totals of votes to-date — 13,268 residents voted yes and 6,628 residents voted no.

Rabinow said those numbers exclude absentee ballots and other ballots that were being hand counted at the time.

She said tabulators in District 2 hit a snag around 1:30 a.m. Wednesday, when a small number of ballots weren't processing. As a result, around 250 ballots needed to be hand counted.

"We’ve had problems with the sheet feed, when the ballots get stuck or you can’t push them in," she said. "But we’ve never had a problem when the ballot looks ordinary, it’s properly filled out by the voter and the machine just won’t accept it."

Rabinow said the number of hand-counted ballots doesn't affect the project's approval because of how high the margins were.

"The 250 ballots they’re counting right now is a very small percentage of the total ballots," she said. "When you consider we’ve already gotten close to 20,000 votes in on that question, it’s a very small percentage."

Rabinow said the registrar's office never had an issue with tabulators not accepting ballots that were properly filled out until the tabulators at District 2's polling location at Booth Hill Elementary School showed issues.

"There was something that prevented all those ballots from being read," Rabinow said. "We’ve got to get to the bottom of this because we can't let it happen again."

Democratic Town Committee Chair Ashley Gaudiano shared her excitement for the project to be underway.

"The Democratic Town Committee took a stance on this and urged voters to vote "yes," recognizing it's truly a not a partisan issue, but an issue that is so critical and central to the well being of our children in this town," she said. "... I’m really grateful that people again across party lines decided to prioritize this investment."

Semmel said he's ready for the project to start and appreciates the support of the residents.

"We know that the Trumbull community supports education and this vote is another indication of that strong support," he said. "We look forward to taking the next steps in this process and creating a wonderful new learning environment for our students." 

Jeff Wyszynski, principal at Hartford-based Tecton Architects. designed Trumbull's District Master Plan, which breaks down structural issues among all 13 schools and lists each one by order of greatest need. 

Hillcrest Middle School was selected as the first building that was in the worst physical state.

The question on the ballot said "Shall the $142,375,000 appropriation and bond authorization for the planning, design and  construction of a new Hillcrest Middle School be approved?"

Earlier this year, First Selectman Vicki Tesoro announced that Rep. Sarah Keitt helped secure a 44 percent reimbursement rate from the state, which drastically decreased the cost of the project to taxpayers. As a result, the town has to pay around $82.5 million. 

Madison Middle School was formerly Trumbull High School in 1960, according to records from the Trumbull Historical Society.

Semmel said, since Madison Middle School was originally designed as a high school, it has more suitable amenities than Hillcrest does, like more space for an auditorium and more classes.

Thus, affording Hillcrest the opportunity to see much needed building with necessary improvements the current building lacks, such as a fire protection system, more space for classrooms and an auditorium.

Principal Bryan Rickert said the 117,000-square-foot building has reached its end and said he's done all he can to make the building work for both his students and staff.

Rickert previously said, "Our students deserve it, our families deserve it and our teachers deserve it. I can't wait to see what our students can do once our teachers have all the resources they need to provide an even greater opportunity for this 21st century we’re in." 


Bristol issues RFP for ‘prime development property’ near ESPN

David Krechevsky

Bristol officials announced Wednesday that the city is accepting requests for proposals from developers and others for the sale and development of a remediated brownfield property located across the street from ESPN’s campus.

The property, at 894 Middle St., encompasses three contiguous parcels owned by the city. Combined, the parcels make up an approximately 15-acre site.

The city acquired the site several years ago and completed an environmental assessment and remediation activities with assistance from the state, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Naugatuck Valley Council of Governments. 

The property formerly was the site of a metal reclamation operation. It was recognized as a brownfield property in recent years, and remediation work on the PCB-contaminated property was completed with a $1.3 million grant from the state Department of Economic and Community Development (DECD) and matching funds from the city.

The undeveloped property is in a high-profile location with access to Interstate 84 and Route 72. In addition to ESPN, there are five hotels within 2.5 miles of the site, and the Lake Compounce amusement park is directly adjacent to the rear.

The city said it invites proposals that enhance economic development through the “best use” of this site. It is specifically interested in commercial/industrial prospects that will “enhance the local economic base through a redevelopment project that meets high standards of design, exhibits high market feasibility, offers employment opportunities, and that can offer other benefits to the community.”

It added that, due to the nature of environmental remediation, residential use for the property is “not appropriate.” The city instead encouraged proposals for commercial development, which can include logistics/warehouse, manufacturing, recreation/tourism, retail and more.   

Submissions will be accepted between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday.

A non-mandatory pre-submission meeting will be held on Tuesday, Dec. 3, at 11 a.m. at the intersection of Middle Street and Enterprise Drive (the northeast corner of the property) to allow for an opportunity to meet with city staff and discuss the property.

One or more qualified proposals will be selected, and representatives will be invited for an interview with city officials, they said. Should the first selection be unable to complete an agreement for any reason, the city said it reserves the right to pursue other developers.

Submissions will be accepted via email, shared file service, or USB drive by the purchasing department until Jan. 7, 2025 at 11 a.m. Any submissions received after that date and time will not be considered. 

Information about the property and the bid process is available here.


November 4, 2024

CT Construction Digest Monday November 4, 2024

Torrington voters face referendum question on spending $6M for school turf fields; most of the funds would be reimbursed by state

SLOAN BREWSTER

TORRINGTON – The city wants voter input on spending $6 million, 85% of which will be reimbursed by the state, for turf fields at the new high school and middle school complex.

A referendum question on the appropriation is included on the ballot for Tuesday’s election.

The expense would increase the cost of the school construction project from $179.575 million to $185.575 million.

State Rep. Michelle L. Cook, D-Torrington, said the state Department of Administrative Services approved the inclusion of the additional $6 million with the funds the state will reimburse by 85%.

Previously, items such as athletic fields were not eligible for reimbursement, she said.

Originally the high school construction project included the fields but when the COVID-19 pandemic hit and the cost of goods increased, the Building Committee decided to scale back on some things, including the fields.

It makes sense to cover that shortfall now, Cook said, noting that athletics can keep students on track, giving them a reason to keep up their grades.

“It teaches teamwork and camaraderie,” added Cook, who is running for re-election Tuesday. “If we’re building a brand new school, a state-of-the-art facility, which will be one of the best in the state if not the best in the state, so how fair is to complete everything and leave the outside fields undone?”

Mayor Elinor C. Carbone concurs. She said it wouldn’t make sense to build a beautiful building sure to position educators “to really present robust educational opportunities” and have “mediocre fields” requiring a lot of maintenance.

“The fact that the state is willing to reimburse up to 85% of the cost for expenses that otherwise would not qualify for reimbursement is an incredible opportunity,” she said.

Carbone said the impact to taxpayers will be minimal.

Building Committee Co-Chair Edward Arum said the athletic complex will consist of two baseball fields, two softball fields and a multipurpose field. If they are grass, which is the plan as of now, Arum said maintenance would be more expensive.

Lining, watering and mowing would run about $90 000 a year, he said. The quote the committee got to maintain the turf is $22,000.

Turf can be used immediately, while the grass will need time to grow. In addition, turf can be used daily while grass sometimes has to be closed between activities to prevent overuse.

Arum said grass fields will likely need to be replaced about every other year at an estimated $150,000 cost.

He noted that the 15% cost the city will cover will come out of the $1.2 million in the budget to construct the grass fields.

Arum also gave an update on the school construction. He said contractors are getting ready to install black top in parking areas between November 8 and 18.

“So everybody will be for January 22,” he said.

The high school is scheduled for a Jan. 22 opening; the middle school will open next fall.


XL Center construction bumps some seating at the Hartford arena as UConn games begin to ramp up

Liese Klein

Fans of UConn Huskies hockey and basketball might notice some changes at Hartford’s XL Center when the first games start playing there next week — construction activity that has displaced some seating.

“We’re rocking and rolling … from a construction standpoint,” said XL Center General Manager Ben Weiss. “The construction is everywhere, and we’re dealing with it.”

Weiss and construction manager Robert Houlihan updated the Capital Regional Development Authority on Friday with the latest in the $145 million revamp of the aging arena. 

With construction ongoing, some premium seating areas in the XL Center have been relocated to higher levels, with more changes expected as the bowl demolition ramps up, Weiss said of the arena area.

“We’ll get through this year and brighter days are ahead,” Weiss added. 

Between 30 and 40 construction workers are now on the job at the XL Center, getting ready to demolish the current bowl and make way for a revamped arena with upgraded seating, locker rooms, an elite club and a new commercial kitchen.

Work will continue through the peak sports season at the XL Center, with frequent Wolfpack minor league hockey, UConn hockey and men’s and women’s basketball games, Houlihan said. The arena is expected to host up to five events a week through the beginning of the year.

Construction hasn’t impacted attendance so far at the arena, which drew 12,300 people for pop singer Sabrina Carpenter’s sold-out concert on Oct. 2, according to CRDA Executive Director Michael Freimuth.

Work is also under way for a new commercial kitchen at the XL Center, with plans to upgrade the food offerings for premium areas as well as the arena as a whole, Freimuth said. Better food has the potential to boost the arena’s per-attendee spending and overall revenue.

“This somewhat innocuous little corner of the building, this could become critical going forward,” Freimuth said of the kitchen.

The start of roof improvements at East Hartford’s Pratt & Whitney Stadium at Rentschler Field are on tap for early 2025, Freimuth said. Once a construction manager is chosen, work on the stadium’s roof could start as soon as February. 

Future work is needed on Rentschler Field’s IT infrastructure, metal detectors and sound system, Freimuth said. The state’s bond commission is expected to consider more money for the project. A 2023 study found that the East Hartford stadium needed at least $63 million in renovations to upgrade its antiquated systems.


Sale of the last city-owned Fort Trumbull parcels to developer finalized

John Penney

New London― A New Haven development firm on Wednesday formally purchased the last parcels of city-owned land on the Fort Trumbull peninsula with plans to start constructing the first of two housing complexes on the property next year.

The Renaissance City Development Association (RCDA) the city’s development arm, brokered an agreement in 2023 that included selling 6.28 acres split among three parcels to RJ Development + Advisors, LLC for $500,000.

RJ Development, which built The Beam, a 203-unit apartment complex on Howard Street, pitched building two 250-unit apartment complexes on Nameaug and Walbach streets, and constructing a 1,200-space parking garage at 26 East St.

Both apartment projects call for a mix of market-rate studio and one- and two-bedroom units with on-site property parking. The proposed six-story East Street garage is expected to be heavily used by employees at the nearby Electric Boat engineering offices.

Wednesday’s deal was finalized less than two months after the City Council on Sept. 16 approved nearly $6.5 million in tax breaks over 20 years to RJ Development, which would cover about half the $13 million in estimated pre-construction costs. In exchange, the city will receive approximately $18 million in tax revenue over the life of the agreement.

“There is no inventory left on Fort Trumbull,” Mayor Michael Passero said.

Progress after a controversial land taking

The Fort Trumbull area in the late 1990s was cleared of homes and businesses as part of a plan developed by the city and the New London Development Corp., the predecessor of the RCDA, to help jump start economic development in association with the construction of Pfizer’s research headquarters.

A bitter fight ensued in which a handful of property owners refusing to sell their land led to the landmark 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case Kelo v. New London. The court ruled in favor of New London and its use of eminent domain to seize the properties for private development.

Except for construction of the Pfizer facility, now occupied by Electric Boat, and Fort Trumbull State Park, the rest of the peninsula remained undeveloped for decades, with the area becoming overgrown and devoid of activity.

Talks with developers interested in Fort Trumbull land moved sporadically in the years after the ruling but only gained real momentum in 2022 with the purchase of 4 acres by the Optimus Construction Management company for $750,000.

The Massachusetts company, which specializes in building and running senior living facilities, planned to build 104 apartments and a hotel with extended-stay suites on the site.

Though there’s been no movement by Optimus to begin building on the peninsula, RCDA Executive Director Peter Davis said there are some promising signs that something will eventually be constructed at the sites.

“The timing for (Optimus) was horrible coming right before the pandemic and the related supply chain issues,” Davis said. “But two weeks ago, I had conversations with Optimus about a hotel chain interested in the property, as well as a developer who worked on housing projects in Groton.”

Davis said Optimus recently hired an office employee to help conduct “due diligence” work regarding the two projects.

“We brought people down for a site walk and they’re aware of the community center construction,” he said, referring to the ongoing building of a new $40 million city recreation center at Fort Trumbull. “I think seeing that did a lot for them.”

A new RCDA mission

Felix Reyes, the city’s director of planning and economic development, said Friday large-scale development projects move in cycles tied to larger market and real estate forces.

“We’re seeing those plans from the 1990s and 2000s finally realized,” he said about the RJ Development projects.

Passero, Reyes and Davis said while the RCDA’s initial overarching mission – to successfully market city-owned Fort Trumbull properties – is complete, there’s still plenty of other work on tap for the nonprofit.

Reyes said he expects the RCDA to play a continuing role in redeveloping land once home to the Crystal Avenue high-rises, as well as the reconstruction of the Fort Trumbull “elbow” fishing pier.

“There’s a lot of historic buildings and neighborhoods that need to be redeveloped for use, including the Garfield Mills district,” Reyes said.

Davis said despite so many years of working almost exclusively on Fort Trumbull, the RCDA is prepared to adjust its focus.

“We’ve had a partnership with the city going back to 2016 and we’re ready to shift full-time to other city projects,” he said.


Connecticut Siting Council approves controversial Enfield solar facility plan after revisions

Joseph Villanova

ENFIELD — The Connecticut Siting Council has approved a contentious $3.75 million solar facility planned for Town Farm Road after months of resistance from both residents and local officials.

Avon-based Lodestar Energy filed a petition in February for a 4,702-panel, 1.93-megawatt solar photovoltaic electric-generating facility on 12.1 acres of unused farmland at 141 Town Farm Road in Enfield. The proposed facility lands exclusively in the Siting Council's jurisdiction per state statute, a sticking point among elected officials in Enfield and beyond.

The developer amended its petition in September in an attempt to address concerns from both neighbors and Siting Council members, primarily intended to reduce noise generation, glare problems, and visibility outside the parcel.

Members of the Siting Council voted 5-1 on Oct. 24 to accept a decision and order to issue a declaratory ruling on Lodestar Energy's petition, allowing the project to move forward. Bill Syme, the lone dissenter, said that he still took issue with the loss of "prime farmland" from the construction and how close the facility would sit to residential properties.

"It's literally in people's backyards, and I have a hard time with that," Syme said.

The Siting Council's decision states the governmental body found that the proposed facility would not have "a substantial adverse environmental effect" and adheres to applicable standards from state and federal agencies.

Conditions placed on the Siting Council's approval include site plan and landscaping adjustments, an annual maintenance plan to be adhered to for the 20-plus-year life of the facility, and a post-construction noise study to ensure compliance with state standards.

The Siting Council's opinion, accepted alongside the decision and order, expands on its decision to issue a declaratory ruling, stating that Lodestar Energy redesigned the site plan and revised the project's landscaping after more than two dozen people spoke in hearing or submitted statements about concerns including noise, health effects, and the facility's location.

The opinion states that the facility is not required to prevent any material effect to the status of the prime farmland on-site, as it falls below the 2-megawatt capacity minimum as written in state statute.

Lodestar Energy will lease the project site from the property owner and construction will occur over a six- to nine-month period with works hours from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Saturday.


Southington's safety and streetscape project expected to be completed by June 2025

Ciara Hooks

SOUTHINGTON — Once the Plantsville Safety & Streetscape Project is complete, Hop Haus patrons can expect a more attractive and safer experience at the century-old brick building on West Main Street, which vehicles have hit several times over the years.

The $5.4 million project intended to improve pedestrian and motorist safety in the area of Route 10 and West Main Street is expected to be completed in late spring after a couple of hurdles have caused a three-month timeline to become nearly a year. 

Funded through the Local Transportation Capital Improvement Program, the project includes roadway redesign at the intersection, new concrete pavement, drainage work, new sidewalks, decorative crosswalks, the installation of benches, and modified traffic lights. 

"The project itself, I think, is great. It's much needed and long overdue," said Mike Miller, owner of Hop Haus Restaurant Group. "Plantsville is an amazing part of Southington, and it's just going to bring a lot of life to downtown and make it a nice little destination."

A separate project in tandem with the safety and streetscape project built a wall and pocket park at the Hop Haus, which has been crashed into over five times in seven years. With the two projects, Hop Haus should be out of the line of fire.

"There should have been a wall put up six years ago to protect people," Miller said. "In my opinion, that should have been the first part of the project."

The Plantsville Safety & Streetscape Project also added rapid flashing beacons at the crossing at the Linear Trail.

"The actuated crossing forces folks to stop, especially those on bicycles, take a right, and then look before crossing," said Town Manager Alex J. Ricciardone. "They think it's crazy because it doesn't make sense. It's made to not make sense."

Paramount Construction began work in March on West Main Street westbound, from the firehouse to the Hyde Away Café, followed by work on South Main Street near the post office and Main Street from Grove Street to West Main Street.

Work is currently being done in the remaining areas of West Main Street, Main Street, and North Main Street.

"There are two separate villages here, and we wanted to create a catalyst for economic development," Town Engineer James A. Grappone said. "So, prior to us doing the project, you could see that the business owners were starting to make improvements to the façade of their buildings. So, we've been trying to work with the business owners to incorporate what they wanted in the project, even though it was designed 12 years ago." 

At the Town Council's Oct. 17 meeting, Councilor Michael DelSanto was optimistic about the project's progress.

"I'm delighted to say that things have kind of been somewhat buttoned up (in downtown Plantsville), even though there is a lot of construction, but the construction companies and the police are doing a great job ensuring that businesses are accessible, and traffic is directed correctly with the additional issues that have occurred down there." 

Lions Den Coffee Shop owner Vinny Infante said the project has affected his business the most. His shop opens before work crews start in the morning and closes well after they finish in the evening. But he has adapted, and so have the crews.

"This project has already had a positive economic impact on our business, as we see when there is no construction, we have lines out the door to check out our top-quality drinks, amazing food and pastries, and newly renovated patio," he said. "We have been growing at such a rate even with the downtown renovation; we are bringing on the most team members we have ever had to include a cook with a culinary degree who worked in the hospitality industry in Colombia and Argentine to really highlight our alcohol menu that is coming soon."

Council Chair Paul Chaplinsky Jr. said during the October Town Council meeting that the central part of the downtown should be substantially completed by the first week of November.

The entire project was expected to be completed by September but hit a few snags. The biggest was the discovery of trolley tracks under some roads.

"We weren't able to just pave," Ricciardone said. "We had to dig down about a foot or two to get the grade to all flow so we don't get flooding concerns. So that really added on time to the project."

The decorative poles throughout West Main Street, on which banners and flowers will be hung, almost added a year to the project's timeline and increased the budget as many needed to be replaced. Grappone said they managed to get the replacement poles down to nine from 21.

Officials anticipate the project will be completed around May or June. A mild winter could speed up the project.

"Paramount Construction will be returning in March/April to complete the state road section on South Main Street, from the Main Street intersection to the southerly terminus of the project," Grappone said.

While Miller expects the project to enliven downtown once it's complete, he isn't happy about the time it is taking.

"The fact that this was supposed to be a three-month project and of no fault of Southington due to the state of Connecticut, it's turning into a year project, I think, is a little bit ridiculous," Miller said. "It's done more than impede my business. My last four to six months are 30 percent below normal. It's really hurting business and driving people away from the center of Plantsville. If this was a three- or four-month project like it was supposed to be, I can see the reward outweighing the inconvenience, but there's been one problem after another."

Ricciardone said the town purchased signage to inform people that businesses were open, spent $5,000 on a social media campaign with food influencers to post about the restaurants, and visited the restaurants for lunch. Miller said the efforts have helped. 

"We appreciate the public's patience," Ricciardone said. "This has been an extremely difficult project for the business owners and the residents, but we hope all the hard work is going to pay off for an absolutely awesome product when it's done."


This new CT soccer team and stadium could transform the region, but questions remain

Alexander Soule

Organizers are confident a project that includes bringing an MLS Next Pro soccer team to Connecticut will have a transformative effect on the region. But a year after the pitch was made public, questions remain regarding just how much money the project could cost taxpayers, and whether a stadium will come to fruition in time for the team to play its first games in Bridgeport in 2026.

Club owner Andre Swanston expressed optimism that fans will turn out for MLS Next Pro soccer in a recent sit-down interview with CT Insider, reviewing plans for both the Connecticut United Football Club and stadium. Last week, the Bridgeport Planning & Zoning Commission tabled for the time being any consideration of the stadium and larger development while the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection assesses the project under a coastal review procedural process.

Swanston has invested more than $1 million himself in the project to date. But far more than that will be required to underwrite the cost of the stadium and additional development like apartments, a hotel and other recreational draws like restaurants to have the project pay off for investors. The stadium facility alone could cost $75 million according to a budget document from earlier this year reviewed by CT Insider, not including "soft" costs like design work or any cost overruns during construction.

With 16 months left before the start of the 2026 MLS Next Pro season, Swanston needs to get necessary municipal and state approvals in place to prepare the site for construction of a “modular” stadium, which he estimates could be completed in as little as 10 months but could take as long as 18 months.

Swanston did not rule out opening the season with a series of road games if construction spills over into CT United FC’s debut season, as the case with an MLS Next Pro team in North Carolina, or the Hartford Yard Goats in their inaugural 2016 season in Major League Baseball’s minor leagues. But that is not the goal, Swanston made clear, saying that the benefits for Bridgeport are obvious for a new stadium with capacity for 7,500 people and the possibility of one or more other pro sports teams sharing it.

"You have the most densely populated, the most affluent market without any of the top five men's sports leagues," Swanston said last week during an interview alongside an MLS Next Pro executive at the Norwalk office of Hearst Connecticut Media. "We've done the research. We've put our money where our mouth is, and we've started laying that foundation."

MLS Next Pro admission – at what price?

Sticker shock has already hit a similar project in Rhode Island, where the rival USL Championship soccer league hopes to have a new Pawtucket stadium for its Rhode Island Football Club affiliate. The Tidewater Landing stadium’s construction costs were tabbed at more than $27 million, according to WPRI, but taking on the cost of bonds to underwrite portions of the project, estimated costs have ballooned to $132 million, though officials expect the larger figure to drop in the coming years as debt is refinanced at a lower interest rates.

The Hartford Athletic also plays in the USL Championship league, at Trinity Health Stadium adjacent to Colt Park in Hartford. The leagues play on the same level of competition one step below Major League Soccer, but do not schedule inter-league matches. 

Swanston confirmed that to get the Bridgeport stadium off the ground, it will take significant investment and he has been in conversations with state officials about public funding. He deflected multiple questions on any range of costs for the Bridgeport stadium and wider development.

In a statement forwarded to CT Insider last week, the Connecticut Sports Group led by Swanston stated the group believes it has "strong support" in its words from the Bridgeport Planning & Zoning Commission on key elements of the plan, and pledged to continue working with city and state leaders "to address any remaining commission requirements so the project can advance and deliver meaningful benefits to the community," in its words.

The as-yet-unnamed Bridgeport stadium would be designed for 7,500 people, but with an expandable layout to get to a seating capacity of 10,000 if ticket demand proves strong for pro soccer in southern Connecticut. LaBella, the company leading the design and engineering of the stadium, is also working on the Rhode Island FC stadium.

Swanston said the National Women's Soccer League has expressed interest in the idea of an NWSL team in Bridgeport, but has yet to proceed toward any formal commitment. And Swanston continues to dangle the long-term possibility of an MLS franchise for Bridgeport, saying the Bridgeport site could be reimagined to accommodate a stadium for as many as 22,000 spectators, if MLS were to show interest. Under that scenario, the minor league club could share the stadium with any new MLS team, or possibly relocate to a smaller stadium in Connecticut.

"We've had a lot of inbound interest about other potential tenants as well," Swanston said. "The modular [architecture] allows some optionality going forward — you can build on top of it, or you can remove it if you want to do more drastic changes to the structure.”

Swanston is sticking to the revised timeline of a new Bridgeport stadium in place by March 2026 for the start of that year's season, while acknowledging the tightening window to finalize state and municipal approvals for construction, and related financing. Swanston did not say definitively whether he would launch the team at another temporary home in time for the 2026 season if no stadium was ready at that point.  

There is precedent for that scenario in MLS Next Pro, after the Carolina Core played the first part of its debut season in 2019 on the road while waiting on the completion of its $38 million stadium in High Point, North Carolina.

The Hartford Yard Goats also spent their first season on the road in 2016 after after delays completing Dunkin' Park in Hartford. The Yard Goats had the third best attendance in Major League Baseball's affiliated Double-A Eastern League in 2023 at more than 6,000 people a game, a gate that bested more than half the stadiums at the Triple-A level according to attendance data posted by The Baseball Cube.

Swanston thinks CT United FC has all the ingredients for similar success, and that he continues to work though challenges that come up that have delayed his original timeline for CT United FC to be ready for the 2025 season.

MLS Next Pro's senior executive drew a parallel between the Bridgeport development an MLS Next Pro team in Cincinnati, which considered a suburban setting for its team but opted instead for a costlier stadium within the city limits.

"What we have learned is typically the best locations, the best projects — the ones with the most impact — are the hardest, and this one is no different," said Charles Altchek, president of MLS Next Pro and executive vice president of Major League Soccer. "You don't have to be a real estate expert to understand this is an incredible location that if unlocked, in the right way with this type of project, is going to create a halo effect of investment and energy and people wanting to be there."

Growing into a fan base

MLS does not provide financial support for teams and stadium projects, according to Altchek, who lives in New Canaan.  That is the case despite more than 400 MLS Next Pro players having shuttled on to MLS rosters at points during the 2022 and 2023 seasons, with 90 getting MLS contracts, as Altchek disclosed in a post this year on the social media site X.

Altchek echoed Swanston in saying the league would rather see CT United FC open the 2026 season in a permanent home in Bridgeport.

"You only get to launch once, and we've seen all different versions of that," Altchek said. "What we have learned more than anything is that you really need to take advantage of that moment, and launching into your new stadium is a big part of that — that sets the tone for how your fan base is going to engage with the team."

MLS Next Pro has seen attendance run the gamut in its three years of league play. The St. Louis City2 MLS Next Pro club has drawn big crowds, including a match attended by more than 10,000 people this summer at the St. Louis stadium the team shares with its MLS affiliate St. Louis City.

But a Oct. 20 playoff game between host Inter Miami CF II and the Columbus Crew2 showed an expanse of empty seats in a large portion of Chase Stadium in Fort Lauderdale — despite the home team offering tickets for free to individuals or groups of up to six. And Philadelphia Union II’s playoff match against New York City Football Club II likewise showed large swaths of empty seats.

New England Revolution II matches drew small numbers of spectators in matches this summer as well, including at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Massachusetts. In Everett outside Boston,  New England Revolution owner Robert Kraft is pushing for a soccer stadium with seating for about 25,000 people for both the MLS club as well as its New England Revolution II affiliate in MLS Next Pro.

Altchek said more teams will be making the move into new stadiums in the coming years. And Swanston is not the only new club owner wanting to kick things off in a new venue, with an effort underway to build a stadium for an MLS Next Pro team for Albany, New York.

"We're close to celebrating our 30th year in MLS and we're in our third year of Next Pro, so we've learned a lot about what works and what doesn't work," Altchek said. "What we have learned more than anything at MLS is, for our teams to be successful they need to have a lot of different elements — fan engagement, community development, the right brand, a competitive team, all those kinds of things. But as important as all that is the right stadium in the right location, and the stadium in many respects is what unlocks the commercial opportunity."


Trumbull residents will vote whether to OK funds for a new Hillcrest Middle School

Shaniece Holmes-Brown

TRUMBULL — Hillcrest Middle School officials said teachers have to go to great lengths to meet their students' needs due to the building's lack of resources.

Principal Bryan Rickert said the 117,000-square-foot building is bursting at the seams and staff are forced to convert various spaces into other uses against their original design.

"We've used up every inch of space we have," he said.

There is referendum vote looming on Tuesday to decide if the town can build a new school. The question on the ballot says "Shall the $142,375,000 appropriation and bond authorization for the planning, design and  construction of a new Hillcrest Middle School be approved?"

If the majority of residents vote yes, the project can move forward and officially begin. And if not, construction can't happen and the process would have to start all over again.

Given the coming vote, Rickert expressed the dire state the current building is in.

"Our students deserve it, our families deserve it and our teachers deserve it," he said of a new school. "I can't wait to see what our students can do once our teachers have all the resources they need to provide an even greater opportunity for this 21st century we’re in."

Rickert said sometimes a classroom is converted for more storage space, and other times a tiny makeshift classroom is created in the hallway for students who need extra support.

"Every year it gets harder, and it will continue to get harder," Rickert said. "What we don’t ever want to have happen is our students at this school to be at a disadvantage because it can’t support what our teachers can do."

During a walkthrough of the building on Oct. 18, students' bags were lined up along the hallway of the music department because the classrooms were too cramped with seats and instruments.

The boys' locker room had an area sectioned off with gym equipment, including bicycles and golf clubs, while sections of its damaged floors were patched up with pieces wood and duct tape.

In the girls' locker room, desks and seats were stacked up in showers that haven't been used in decades. Rickert said the showers were there since the school's inception in 1967.

Michaela Durand, the school's technology innovation specialist, said her daughter, a seventh grader, attends Hillcrest. Durand said her 69-year-old father also attended the school back when it was a junior high.

Durand said despite the generations between the two, the school hasn't changed at all, besides a paint job or two.

"When you think about what a school building looked like in the 1960s, this is it," she said. "When Hillcrest opened, this was the new building. Now to think that after all this time, it hasn’t improved at all, but so much about teaching has changed."

Madison Middle School was formerly Trumbull High School in 1960, according to records from the Trumbull Historical Society. 

The records also showed Hillcrest and Middlebrook were the town's two junior high schools, until a new high school was built on Strobel Road in 1971, where it still stands.

Superintendent Martin Semmel said, since Madison Middle School was originally designed as a high school, it has more suitable amenities than Hillcrest does, like more space for an auditorium and more classes.

"It’s important to note that right now, Hillcrest, I would say, is at a slight disadvantage to Madison Middle School," Semmel said. "Madison Middle School is an old high school, and therefore, contains some things that Hillcrest Middle School doesn’t."

He said, although a new Hillcrest building would be ahead aesthetically, its programmatic needs would be catching up with what Madison already has.

Jeff Wyszynski, principal at Hartford-based Tecton Architects. designed Trumbull's District Master Plan, which breaks down structural issues among all 13 schools and lists each one by order of greatest need.

He said Booth Hill Elementary School and Madison Middle School are both being looked as next in line if the referendum is approved. But determining which one would come next is still up in the air.

"I think what’s most important about the master plan is it has that flexibility," he said. "A few years from now, some of the priorities might change a bit, depending on what that need is."

According to the town charter, a referendum vote is required for projects that exceed $15 million.

The Hillcrest project costs approximately $142,375,000 and the town would pay around $82.5 million. 

Earlier this year, First Selectman Vicki Tesoro announced that Rep. Sarah Keitt helped secure a 44 percent reimbursement rate from the state, which drastically decreased the cost of the project to taxpayers.

Semmel said if the referendum isn't approved, the cost to taxpayers will be much higher.

"If the referendum does not pass, there’s going to be a significant cost due to the updates that need to happen here," he said. "We are coming to a crossroads where the buildings need to be updated. And if we don’t start with one ... we're going to end up with more and more costs for all."