June 24, 2019

CT Construction Digest Monday June 24, 2019

Dan Haar: Coaxing a Senate leader on tolls
 A play in one scene:
A dark night inside the domed Capitol building of a struggling state on the first weekend of summer. Most legislators are long gone with the spring session over. Two men cross paths in the shadows.
NED: Senator? Is that you? Shouldn’t you be home plotting the next Medicaid expansion?
MARTY: Hello, Governor. I was just polishing up my comments for next week’s ceremony.
NED: Ceremony?
MARTY: You know, when you sign paid family and medical leave into law. Took us three years to get it through, a triumph for working people. It’s a great social insurance program that brings us in line with other forward-looking states. What keeps you here so late?
NED: Tolls, Senator Looney, tolls. We have no other way to fix our roads and bridges to get this state moving again. I just spent the week laying out all the facts — how the numbers can’t add up to the $1.2 billion a year we need, even with the car sales tax and more borrowing. Bridge tolls don’t add up either.
MARTY: So what do you want from me?
NED: I want a vote on tolls in the Senate, Marty. Joe A-to-Z has the support lined up in the House. We need you to take action. People are wondering why we haven’t called a special session. They’re starting to believe Fasano that we can’t pass it.
MARTY: I don’t know, Gov. I’m just not sure we have the numbers.
NED: Let’s go through this one more time. Hartley is a no for sure, Kushner campaigned against it. Mae Flexer is a no but maybe the unions can bring her around. Maroney is in a tough spot and so is Needleman. But we have the lieutenant governor for a tie-break so we need just one of those five. Come on, Marty. You know you have this.
MARTY: Yeah, okay, but I’m worried, Ned. We’re getting so much done. A $15 minimum wage. Fully funded agencies. Protection for immigrants. Ethan’s law. Time’s Up on sexual assault. Police accountability. Health care for 4,000 more poor parents. Now, paid leave. Why risk all this progress by making senators take an unpopular vote? Some who will vote for it don’t even like tolls. Now they’ll take a fall in 2020.
NED: Been meaning to talk with you about paid leave, Marty. It sure is a pretty bill.
MARTY: Senate Bill Number 1. Our highest priority.
NED: It would be a shame if something happened to it. You know, like, if a legal glitch fell on it and I couldn’t sign the bill. I’d hate to see that.
MARTY: Governor Lamont! You wouldn’t.
NED: Hey, don’t get me wrong, I like paid leave. Even campaigned on it. Everyone pays one-half of 1 percent of their income up to the Social Security threshold - what is that, about $140,000? How can people live on that? Anyway, it should help attract young people to the state.
MARTY: That’s $132,900, governor. Yeah, I can’t believe the Republicans think it’s just another tax on hard-working families. And Haar, usually on our side, said in a column we should delay it until the state is back on solid ground. Doesn’t he see all the good it would do?
NED: I know you have your heart set on it. And speaking of tolls, did you see I sweetened the deal with a $100 million income tax cut for the working class? If I were smart, I’d up that to at least $250 million by throwing in some property tax credits for homeowners. Could even target the credits at poor cities, Senator. Like, I don’t know, New Haven?
MARTY: Oh Governor, I never knew you cared.
NED: I care, Marty, I care a lot. You really delivered for me in November and I want to sign that paid family leave bill - maybe right there in your district. That would show up Brennan at CBIA for coming down against tolls, defying half his members. But I need that vote, Senator. Let’s get it done in the summer. No one will even notice - just like the primaries last year.
MARTY: Listen, Ned. You know I’m with you, but a lot of taxpayers say they can’t trust state government. We passed that lock-box referendum in November and seven months later, we yank $58 million of the car sales tax from the transportation fund. Now we’re seeing reports our DOT spends way more per mile on road reconstruction than just about any other state. Seven billion dollars for the Waterbury Mixmaster, really?
NED: That’s just not true. Just Thursday, Joey G. at the DOT told editorial writers that report in Reason about wild spending was ‘inherently flawed.’ He said, ‘When we actually do an orange-to-orange comparison, there is no difference.’ Then Giulietti said the author of the report is about to come out with a revision.
MARTY: We certainly need to straighten that out with the public.
NED: What we certainly need is that tolls vote. Stop worrying. Trump on the ballot in ‘20 means your Senate Dems could run naked along I-95 carrying Nader signs and still win re-election. That leaves you in charge until you’re what, almost 75 in ’23? I could be a one-termer like Weicker but that’s okay.
MARTY: It’s a $500 million tax hike, Ned.
NED: With $300 million from out-of-state drivers and interstate trucks. Don’t make me keep talking about interstate trucks. Way, way cheaper than borrowing.
MARTY: Hard to refute when you put it that way. Can we keep all the gantries out of cities? I don’t want to see any clogged local roads. And tell Lehman at DECD to knock it off with expanding Tweed, okay? That’s the only thing Fasano and I agree on.
NED: We’ll see. Just get it done - for SB 1.
MARTY: Thanks for not mentioning it to Pelosi at the dinner. You know she loves tolls as much as legalized pot.
NED: Speaking of that, how about you and I head up to Northamption? Elliott tells me the Ghost Train Haze is kickass. Too bad you couldn’t get that bill through.
MARTY: That was the House, governor, not us. Talk to Joe.

Construction Work on I-91 in Rocky Hill Expected to Start Monday VIDEO
The state Department of Transportation is expected to begin construction work on Elm Street in Rocky Hill Monday.
Crews were supposed to start replacing two bridges on the street that runs over Interstate 91 last week but postponed it until after the Travelers Championship.
The work is expected to last through late August.

BRIDGE BUILDERS: Men who constructed Pell Bridge tell their stories
Derek Gomes   
Dangerous conditions and good pay were just part of the thrill. As the 50th anniversary of the bridge’s opening approaches on June 28, eight men talk about their role in building one of the state’s iconic structures.
“This is the one business you start at the top and work your way down,” Conrad Johnson said about constructing the Pell Bridge. “You’re required to get up in the air. ... There was an adrenaline to it. It’s self-satisfying.”
Fifty years since motorists first crossed under its twin high-arching towers, the Pell Bridge remains an architectural marvel. The longest suspension bridge in New England forever changed the City-by-the-Sea, making it easier for islanders to get to the rest of the state and visitors, for better or worse, to get here.
Depictions of the bridge seem to be everywhere — from the back of the state quarter, to the background of driver’s licenses. It has captured the imaginations of Rhode Islanders — Newporters in particular — like few other structures.
For the countless people who helped build the bridge, the structure is more than an object of fascination; it is a marker in their lives. Workers from across Rhode Island and beyond converged on Newport day after day to raise the structure from the depths of Narragansett Bay’s East Passage.   
Assigned to the project were professional construction workers and summer-job seekers alike. The promise of long work weeks and lucrative overtime was incentive enough for many.
From the beginning of 1966 through the spring of 1969, different contractors completed the bridge — from driving the piles that formed its foundation, to assembling the pieces of the superstructure and putting them in place high above the water. Workers like Newport resident Patrick Hayes gathered near Long Wharf to connect pieces of steel and transport them on barges to the construction site.
Asked if the scene there resembled that of a factory assembly line, he said it was more chaotic. Workers had to have their heads on a swivel. They were stationed a few dozen feet atop pieces of steel, while cranes were swinging materials to and fro nearby.  
The Newport Daily News spoke with eight men, who ranged in age from recent high-school graduates to their early 30s when they worked on the bridge, about what stood out to them from that experience on the eve of the 50th anniversary of the bridge’s opening, on June 28. For some, it was a career milestone; for others it was an aberration, a detour before they found their true calling. For all of them, the experience gave them a sense of ownership or pride that they played a role, however small, in building that iconic structure.
Like son, like father
Jerry Candelmo downplayed his contributions to building the bridge. He was only on site for a month or two, after all, before he was deployed to Vietnam with his National Guard unit, the 103rd Field Artillery Regiment.        
If it weren’t for his father’s role, Candelmo likely would not have agreed to sit down with a reporter in the first place. After owning a tiling business, Anthony Candelmo took a job on one of the tugboats that ferried workers to and from the bridge site. His inexperience did not deter the powers that be from hiring him as a deckhand responsible for cooking meals.
“They were looking for men — they were looking for bodies, let’s put it that way,” Jerry Candelmo said. ”‘Do you think your dad would be interested in doing it?’” he remembered being asked. “So I asked him, ‘Dad, would you like to go down there? It’s a good-paying job.’ He always loved the water. So he went and he stayed there until they took that tug out of there — and the tug stayed until almost the end.”  When his father died many years ago, Jerry Candelmo’s brother gave him a token of their father’s work on the bridge: a photo of Anthony Candelmo on the tugboat, with the hulking superstructure of the bridge looming above. The bridge project marked the beginning and end of Anthony Candelmo’s construction career. He went on to manage a parking lot on Empire Street in Providence. For his son, his service during the Vietnam War disrupted what would ultimately be a 45-year construction career.
“When I first started working, I used to ride with this man, an operator, and we were working in Fall River just as you go over the Braga Bridge,” he said. “And we’d be going along and I’d be in his pickup truck and he’d say to me, ‘Jerry, you see that building right there? I put that one up. See that one? I put that one up.’ And I thought, ‘Oh my God, this man has worked on so many projects.’”
Thirty-five years later, the roles were reversed, with Candelmo pointing out to a younger co-worker all the buildings marked with his fingerprints.
“All the men who have worked on these projects,” he said, “they have done it with great pride.”
A new paint job for Dad’s ride
It was the summer of ’69. Officials soon would be commemorating the completion of the Newport Bridge with a dedication ceremony.
 “The fact of the matter is the people of Connecticut – by a wide margin – oppose tolls, and the lawmakers who vote for them will have to answer to their constituents. Every time they drive under a gantry and have to pay another tax, they will remember who supported this legislation,” Sasser said.
NEARLY 60% OF CONNECTICUT residents opposed tolls in a poll that the Hartford Courant and Sacred Heart University released on May 30. The level of opposition was virtually unchanged from a March poll.
The last version of the tolling plan targeted Interstate 84, Interstate 91, Interstate 95, and the portions of Route 15 that comprise the Merritt and Wilbur Cross parkways. There would be 50 tolling locations between the four highways.
The plan proposed maximum toll rates of 4.4 cents per mile after discounts during peak times and 3.5 cents per mile during off peak times. It provided rates could go up or down 30% to satisfy federal requirements. Also, there were to be discounts for purchasers of a state-issued electronic pass, frequent commuters, and motorists whose household income is within 125% of the federal poverty level.

CT Schaghticoke Indian group wants recognition, land, casino
Emilie Munson
KENT — From the quiet woods cradling the Housatonic River, Chief Alan Russell is launching a monumental, long-shot effort to bring land, community, prosperity and possibly a casino to the Schaghticoke Indians, now scattered around Connecticut and the country.
Russell and 50 other members of the Schaghticoke Indian Tribe will refile its petition for federal recognition in July. That petition may kick off a years-long review process — one that is likely to lock the tribe, the state, the town of Kent and others in a high-stakes administrative and legal battle.
To succeed, the little tribe would need to overcome the certain fierce opposition of Connecticut’s political establishment that has quashed efforts like this before. If the tribe fails, it cannot try again.
“I’m just hoping I’m alive to see something,” said Russell, “Grey Fox,” chief since 1983.
If federally acknowledged, the Schaghticoke Indian Tribe would be able to create its own laws as a sovereign nation, receive funding and services from the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs and operate a casino. Russell and his lawyers profess to have land claims to more than 2,000 acres in Kent, including property occupied by the private Kent School and Bulls Bridge Hydroelectric Plant.
If recognized, the Schaghticokes could fundamentally redefine a bucolic town, acrimonious state/tribe and intratribal relations, the New England gambling market and the troubled history of an indigenous people.
“The people of Northwestern Connecticut should avoid any undue fear about these claims, which have been so frivolous in the past and that have been rejected consistently by the courts,” said U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, who as attorney general from 1991 to 2001 opposed tribal petition efforts on behalf of the state.
“We have prevailed in the past,” he added. “I’m pretty confident the state will prevail again.”
Lamont and Attorney General William Tong said they will review the Schaghticoke petition when they see it.
Blumenthal, state officials and the town of Kent have experience fighting a tribal recognition effort. They opposed the petition of the Schaghticoke Tribal Nation, who split from Russell’s faction and briefly won federal recognition but had it revoked in 2005.
The Eastern Pequot Tribe, based in North Stonington, won and lost federal recognition in the early 2000s. The Golden Hill Paugussetts, a small tribe in Trumbull and Colchester, also were denied.
Decades of fighting
The bitter split between Russell’s Schaghticokes and those following Richard Velky, chief of the Schaghticoke Tribal Nation, prompted decades of feuding and violence between the sects.
The two groups do not agree when the split happened or who is the rightful Schaghticoke leader. They each accuse the other of having members who are not Schaghticoke. Police were called on numerous occasions to deal with conflicts between the groups.
Velky pursued recognition for his part of the tribe with the backing of casino backers who included Subway restaurants founder Fred DeLuca.
“I believe there is only one tribe. It is the Schaghticoke Tribal Nation,” Velky said Friday. “… All they did was copy (our petition).”
Russell’s group, the Schaghticoke Indian Tribe, had its own letter of intent to petition filed with the U.S. Department of Interior dating back to the 1980s. Russell said the Schaghticoke Indian Tribe withheld its boxes and boxes of historical and genealogical documents from the Velky clan.
Now that Velky’s petition effort has died, the Schaghticoke Indian Tribe has crafted a petition document 7,000 pages long tracing their history back to the 1700s using contemporaneous sources, said the tribe’s senior adviser, William Buchanan. The document outlines the genealogy of their members and their claims to land.
This petition was submitted to the Interior Department in 2016. The Department responded recommending technical revisions.
“The last petition filed by this group fell well short of the standards and criteria under federal law to meet the requirements for recognition,” Blumenthal said. He said the Schaghticoke Indian Tribe is a faction of Velky’s group.
The Schaghticokes re-sent the petition on March 13. On April 10, the Interior Department sent recommended changes again.
Russell, Buchanan and their lawyer, Toney Pignatiello, said this week they are cleaning up citations and references and plan to resubmit again in July. They are unsure if that one will be the final version.
“I have yet to see this petition but it would have to be radically different and offer significantly new information for federal recognition to be plausibly considered,” said Blumenthal. “I would be surprised if there was anything new in it.”
The U.S. Department of Interior will review the petition and decided whether to acknowledge the tribe. There are now 573 federally recognized American Indian and Alaska Native tribes and villages. Only two, the Mohegans and Mashantucket Pequots, are in Connecticut.
Fast money
To get their petition over the finish line, Buchanan said the tribe will accept investor funding to pay for legal work. He claimed he has had meetings with every major casino operator in the world.
“They’re all watching this very closely,” said Buchanan.
Russell, 73, is not interested in opening a casino on the wild 400-acres the Schaghticoke’s now have as a reservation. Born in New Haven in 1946, he’s lived on this land since he was four and half, scampering the woods, bluffs and riverbanks to hunt, fish and pick berries.
He’d prefer to use the tribe’s land claims and right to run a casino on the reservation to negotiate a deal with the state to open a gambling facility, financed by a private investor, elsewhere - perhaps Fairfield County.
But the Schaghticokes are poor, Russell said. They see casinos as fast money. Buchanan made a thinly veiled threat to the state: if Russell dies or another chief is elected after the petition is granted, a new leader might not hold the same preservationist attitude as Russell.
Bridgeport Mayor Joe Ganim said Thursday he’s had no recent conversations with the Schaghticokes. The governor and attorney general said the same.
Primarily, Russell hopes federal recognition can revive a scattered indigenous community. When he was a boy, the Kilsons, the Cogswells and other families lived on the reservation. But as heads of households died, the state burned and bulldozed their houses in the 1960s, preventing families from staying on the reservation, Russell and Velky agree. Russell’s own home once burned in a suspected arson, he said.
Down a long dirt road, only two small houses now sit on the reservation: Russell’s and his sister Gail’s. With the funding and lawmaking capability federal recognition would bring, Russell said he believes more Schaghticoke families would move back from places like Stratford, New Haven, Vermont and Tennessee.
“A lot of the Schaghticokes - some are well-to-do - but most of them are poor. If I can help them in any way, this is the way to do it,” Russell said.