January 31, 2023

CT Construction Digest Tuesday January 31, 2023

Stamford's last vacant downtown lot could become a 2-building, seven-story 471-unit apartment complex

Jared Weber

STAMFORD — One of the city’s last vacant lots downtown could be on the verge of a major redevelopment creating hundreds of new apartments.

Last week, the Planning Board voted unanimously to recommend plans for two seven-story residential buildings, totaling 471 apartments, in the 70-100 blocks of Clinton Avenue.

The 4.3-acre site is located along the Rippowam River. Officials have been working for decades to piece together a riverside walking path connecting Scalzi Park to Kosciuszko Park — a central facet of long-term plans to expand Mill River Park.

Zoning Board members will hold a public hearing discussing the plans at their online meeting Feb. 6.

The new plans, submitted by New York developer Carmel Partners, have been in the works for at least eight years.

Royal Bank of Scotland previously owned the parcel of land. But after the 2008 financial crisis, the corporation was looking to lay off workers and shed properties in Stamford. Part of the cutbacks included plans to consolidate property to create a large site that attracted residential developers, according to a November 2015 Stamford Advocate article.

The city owned nearby parcels inland, but not abutting the river — where it hoped to expand the Mill River Greenway. Seeing a mutually beneficial opportunity, city officials and RBS agreed to a land swap in August 2016. Officials also approved a general plan for the development that year, according to the Advocate.

After years of delays, New York developer Carmel Partners purchased the site from RBS last year.

"This may be the sixth and, hopefully, final time that we are appearing before you to discuss some aspect of this proposal," Lisa Feinberg, the applicant's attorney, said to the Planning Board.

The developer also agreed to build out the new stretch of walking path during apartment construction, she said. It would require an additional zoning application with the city listed as a co-applicant.

"The idea is that they'll already be mobilized, so they'll be able to do it faster than the city could do it," Feinberg said.

The buildings would face each other across Clinton Avenue: 176 apartments on the eastern side and 295 residences on the western block. In accordance with the Stamford Zoning Board's policy, 49 below-market-rate apartments would be included, distributed throughout both buildings.

Both sides will feature large courtyard spaces. The developers' plan lends itself toward walking and biking, with close access to downtown, the Stamford Transportation Center and, eventually, the Mill River Park walkway.

About 453 parking spots would be available, but they would be unbundled from monthly rent.

Feinberg, of law firm Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey, told The Advocate that the project has been a long time coming.

"My firm has been working on this site since 2007," Feinberg said. "It's a great example of a public-private partnership. There really was a collaboration between us, the city, an important business in town and the Mill River Collaborative."


From Norwalk High School to the SONO school, here's what to know about school construction projects

Faith Marnecheck

NORWALK — The city plans to build three new schools — one high school and two elementary schools — over the next few years. 

Work has already begun on the new $45 million Cranbury Elementary School, while officials are designing South Norwalk's first elementary school in decades and coordinating the logistics for the construction of the new Norwalk High School.

Project managers for the three schools shared important updates on the progress to the Board of Education Facilities Committee at its Jan. 25 meeting. 

"Cranbury School, Norwalk High School and South Norwalk School are all proceeding concurrently but each school is at its own phase," Alan Lo, the city building and facilities manager, said in a statement on Monday.  

SONO school

For the new South Norwalk school, Lo said that the city funded $76 million — $14 million of which was spent “on acquisition of the property” that was owned by The Hatch & Bailey Co. This school will have a large capacity, at nearly twice the size of a typical elementary school. The school is proposed to open fall 2025. 

Edward J. Widofsky, from Tecton Architects, said that the topography of the site has affected the design.“There’s a change of nearly about 70 feet from south to north, so that’s really driving a lot of how we’re trying to lay the site out,” Widofsky said. 

“The lowest section of the site is too far down. This is a floodplain that extends into the southeastern portion of the site. Fortunately, it doesn’t come all the way to the southwestern corner, so there’s still the opportunity to have a vehicular drive here,” he continued. 

The plan is to treat the property as three zones with the school built in the central area. It will have three floors, an outdoor learning area on the roof, and a versatile space called a multi-use learning stair within the media center where students could work and collaborate. Behind the school on the highest part of the property, the upper area will be used for fields, after cutting back the hill. 

"South Norwalk School is completing schematic design phase and we are about to proceed with design development phase," Lo wrote. "Assuming we are able to maintain schedule, we will go out for bids this winter and start construction in the spring of 2024.  Construction would take about 14 to 16 months with potential school opening fall of 2025."  

Polluted materials do exist on the property, which was confirmed by two tests, but the property is not contaminated, according to officials. “We are not considered a hazardous site at all, but we are considered, generally speaking, polluted,” Lo said. 

“So we will have to develop a site soil management plan. The material can’t be left on site unless we cover it, and then, it’s not an issue,” he continued.  

The area around the property has also been changed to be zoned as residential. According to the presentation, over 50 percent of the students who will attend this school would walk to it, which is why $1.5 million in sidewalk improvements are underway by the Transportation, Mobility, and Traffic Department, radiating outward from the school. The main driveway will be for cars to drop off and pick up because the school is not expected to have bus traffic. 

Norwalk High 

To locate the new Norwalk High School, one need not go far from the current one. Dan Phillips, the project manager for Construction Solutions Group, presented the updates to this project. The goal is to start construction at the end of the football season because the new school is being built on the existing football field. Construction will take three years, and then, the students will be relocated. The proposal is for the new school to be ready at the end of 2026 so that the switch can happen between the semesters of the 2026-2027 school year. Lo said other communities have followed a similar plan. 

“I think I would like us to look at what other people have done during this time for us to be able to just have some best practices for us to pull from and replicate,” said Sandra Faioes, assistant superintendent of business and operations. “But, that’s the goal… It’s an ambitious goal, but it would be to actually move everybody over, over winter break.” 

The original school will take about two years to demolish. Diana Carpio, the chair of the Norwalk Board of Education, asked questions regarding parking locations and how this will conflict with the band practice location, which the presenters did not have answers for at this time. 

The project is scheduled to go to bid in the fall, with construction beginning in December. While building the school would take three years, replacing the athletic facilities should take about two, Lo said. 

Norwalk High and P-Tech, a STEM program for high school students, will have separate wings in the new building, which will be three floors and four floors, respectively. A pool and a media center for the Digital Media Communication Academy pathway is also featured in the plans. While the sports teams practice and play offsite, Lo said the construction budget “is committed to provide buses. Not the regular buses, but specially scheduled buses dedicated for the sports program." By fall of 2028, the team plans that students will be on the new football field. 

The effort is reportedly still on budget, and the project manager and team met with the state the same day as the presentation. Faioes said the team  has also conducted frequent meetings with Norwalk High staff, whose feedback they believe to be reflected. The plans also incorporate the comments of King Street residents and of nearby Naramake school.

Phillips said that the team met with Planning and Zoning for a public hearing

“Overall, the planning commission is satisfied with all the questions, all the concerns that were raised by the neighbors and the public,” Lo said. “They closed the public session, but they got into this discussion about energy and solar.”

 A meeting for Wednesday with the Planning and Zoning Commission will focus on the school’s renewable energy efforts, “The public is welcome to attend that meeting, but it’s only focused on the energy piece, not about the general project anymore because they closed that portion of discussion,” Lo said. 

During the presentation, Phillips said the renewable options could include solar panels on the roof and parking lot carports. 

"There are many factors that impact on how large of a system we would install," Lo wrote.

A rooftop solar system would provide about 30 percent of the total electricity consumption of the building. A carport solar system is being considered in addition, although that system would cost more to construct, he said.  

Cranbury Elementary School

Most of the 33 acres on the property for the new Cranbury Elementary School are a wetland, so the construction could only be next to the existing school, Project Manager Michael Faenz said. The sports fields will eventually be built where the existing school sits, but that building will not be demolished until the new school is operational. In the outside learning area, the team has decided to use turf instead of grass because of the high-traffic nature. 

"New Cranbury School is under construction and scheduled to be completed this summer," Lo wrote. "Students would move in for the fall semester. Thereafter, we will begin the demolition of the existing building."

"The Construction Manager will confirm completion date by end of April in case there is supply chain and/or trade contractor issue that we are not aware of at this time," he continued.    

During the presentation, Lo said that if the completion date is maintained, then work on the existing building would begin when school ends. However, if the new school will not be ready for the next semester, the existing building will not be touched so that students can return to it for classes.


Proposed New Britain cannabis warehouse is like a liquor store, officials tell opponents of plan

Emily DiSalvo

NEW BRITAIN — The city's Zoning Board of Appeals will consider the controversial approval of a 133,000-square-foot cannabis cultivation and distribution site on Slater Road on Tuesday.

Rocky Hill-based developer CCC Construction wants to convert the old Webster Bank training facility into a cannabis warehouse, a move that some residents have condemned due to risk of smell and proximity to schools.

"I understand their concerns and want to hear the company address them,” New Britain Mayor Erin Stewart said.

The ZBA's public hearing will consider the warehouse for special exception and variance approval. The timeline of construction depends on the approval, according to a spokesperson for Stewart. 

"While I recognize that some residents in the area have expressed opposition to the proposal, I don't believe that their concerns cannot be adequately addressed by the city and the developer," New Britain resident Daniel Courtney said.

Courtney said he believes the facility would be a good use of the Webster Bank facility, which has been vacant for years. The bank is on the site of the Stanley softball diamond.

"Considering the security measures already in place there, it's ideally suited to be converted into a production and distribution center for Connecticut's budding recreational cannabis industry," Courtney said. "This project promises to bring much-needed tax revenue and jobs to the city."

Other residents agreed with the financial benefits of the industry on the city, saying the facility is no more of a risk than liquor stores.

If approved, the facility will be 0.7 miles from the CREC Academy of Science and Innovation and 0.6 miles from Gaffney Elementary School. It would also be 0.8 miles from E.C. Goodwin Technical Magnet School. 

City Treasurer Danny Salerno believes concerns about proximity to schools should also be extended to liquor stores. There is more than one liquor store within 2 miles of the facility.

"If you want to make comparisons, alcohol is more accessible," Salerno said. "It's available to people — it is everywhere. It's part of our culture, and it isn't necessarily better for us and it doesn't mean everybody who drinks is an alcoholic. That's not at all what I'm saying. The stigma of marijuana that's been placed on it for 50, 60, 70 years is hard to remove for some people."

Salerno served on city council from 2013 to 2021 when members created zoning regulations in anticipation of cannabis legalization and businesses like the proposed warehouse. 

"My position is that people need to kind of get over the issue of the fact that legalization has taken place and now we need to be able to regulate it as we regulate most anything," Salerno said. 


Southington leaders hopeful about Cheshire development

Jesse Buchanan

SOUTHINGTON — A major residential and commercial development underway in Cheshire has Southington business and town leaders hopeful about economic growth for the entire area.

In November, Cheshire planners approved special permits for Stone Bridge Crossing, a 107-acre development bounded by Dickerman Road to the west, Highland Avenue to the east, Interstate 691 to the south and the town line to the north.

Plans for the project from Charter Realty, the leasing agency, show more than 600 housing units in various developments, a hotel and commercial space. During the November hearing, representatives of one of the companies involved, Eastpointe LLC, told Cheshire planners that apartments rents will run from $1,700 for a studio to $3,000 for a three bedroom.

Charter Realty showed on its plans that the hotel is under contract along with a 300-unit multifamily development near the highway.

Spillover demand?

Diana McDougall, a Southington real estate agent, said houses in Southington don’t usually sit on the market for long.

“Southington is still in a strong market situation because the access to highways here for commuters is just awesome,” McDougall said. That’s a big draw for businesses as well, but both commercial and residential development can be tough in Southington at this point.

“We’re running out of space in Southington,” McDougall said.

She believes “without a doubt” that demand for highway access and Southington’s amenities helped prompt the Stone Bridge Crossing development.

“I think it’s going to bring more people into the Southington area” as residents of that development visit Southington commercial areas on Meriden-Waterbury Turnpike and elsewhere.

Business benefit

Barbara Coleman-Hekeler, Southington Chamber of Commerce CEO, said the addition of hundreds of residents just south of the town line will be a boost for local businesses. There’s a lot of entertainment and other attractions to draw people to town, she said, and the Farmington Canal Linear Trail links towns in a big way.

“I always see something like that close to where we are as a plus,” Coleman-Hekeler said.

She lives in Cheshire and said there have been many plans over the years for those properties.

“We’ve even had over the years outlet shopping developers contact us to see if it’s viable for them there,” Coleman-Hekeler said.

Cheshire has commercial development in the central part of town but it lacks easy highway access.

“When a community has basically a single artery of traffic access, it limits some of the development the community can choose,” she said referring to Route 10. 

“Southington as a whole, demographically, has always had an advantage,” Coleman-Hekeler said. “You can come in off the highway across any of the adjacent towns.”

Residents’ concerns

Some Cheshire residents attended November’s planning hearing to voice concerns about the loss of open land in the town’s north end.

"(There were) apple orchards and wide-open spaces and stuff. Now you're changing the north end into a replica of the south end,” said Jane Presnick-Lyon.

Cheshire planning officials said they take land conservation seriously and that a perfect place for development is near the highway.

Earl Kurtz III, Cheshire’s planning board chairman, supported the project.

"We asked for this and we've been looking for this property to get developed and we're looking forward to what might come next with the commercial and the rest of the development,” he said during November’s meeting.

Bob Hammersley, Southington Planning and Zoning Commission chairman, said there’s no mechanism for a town to weigh in on another town’s development.

“They have the authority and the ability to do what’s in their best interest, as do we,” he said.

While he was unsure what the traffic impact of Stone Bridge Crossing might be on Southington, he said it “could have some positive effects on that part of town.”

“I think naturally that those people would frequent businesses in Southington. It’s closer to Southington than to downtown Cheshire.”


New Connecticut economic development chief faces headwinds

Erica E. Phillips

Alexandra Daum, Gov. Ned Lamont’s nominee to lead the Department of Economic and Community Development, told lawmakers at her confirmation hearing last Thursday that growth will be her top priority — a now-familiar refrain from the governor’s office.

But there are strong headwinds facing Daum as she takes over the state’s top economic post. The threat of a recession looms this year, as the Federal Reserve continues to raise interest rates in an effort to tamp down on inflation, and companies have begun downsizing.

In Connecticut, several of the state’s prominent corporate employers have announced layoffs, relocations and restructuring.

Campbell’s Soup Co. said it’s closing its Pepperidge Farm headquarters in Norwalk and consolidating operations in New Jersey. Sikorsky Aircraft parent company Lockheed-Martin announced 800 layoffs in divisions that could include the Stratford plant. Cryptocurrency conglomerate Digital Currency Group, whose move to Connecticut in late 2021 was hailed by the Lamont administration, has closed down one of its subsidiaries while another of its companies filed for bankruptcy. And Denmark-based Lego Group said it’s relocating its North America headquarters from Enfield to Boston in 2025. 

The flurry of unsettling announcements followed news late last year that biotechnology company Sema4 (now known as GeneDx), which received millions of dollars in state loans to build labs in Stamford and Branford, would be shuttering those operations.

Lawmakers asked the incoming economic development commissioner how she plans to respond to the trend in corporate retrenchment.

Want more in-depth Connecticut reporting?

Bottom of Form

“It’s all very disappointing news across the board,” Daum said, but the “silver lining” is the number of open jobs Connecticut employers are currently trying to fill: roughly 100,000. Daum said DECD and the Department of Labor will work with employers to match people who have been laid off with job openings around the state. 

The state government has thousands of open jobs to fill, and Connecticut’s school districts and health care providers are facing staff shortages. New federally funded infrastructure and broadband projects will have thousands of openings in the coming years. And new investment in the semiconductor industry is driving demand for specialized technology workers. 

But it was Lego’s relocation to Boston — driven in part, the company said, by a desire for a more lively urban location with a highly skilled talent pool — that appeared to have the freshest sting. 

“That decision wasn’t made to save money,” said Rep. Julio Concepcion, a democrat from Hartford who co-chairs the Executive and Legislative Nominations Committee. “It’s more about the quality of place that Boston provides,” he said. 

Daum agreed. “The impression that people have is that they can’t get that experience in Connecticut.” But she said wants to change that.

“I’m a big believer in Connecticut cities, in our downtowns, and in the fact that they’ve been underappreciated for a long time,” Daum said. “We need to get the word out about our vibrant downtowns, where you do have young talent, where you do have walkability and transit-oriented environments — and at a lower cost of living than in these major metropolises. So we’ve got a good story to tell.”

Daum hopes telling that story will attract more people to the state and drive economic growth. 

Marketing the state’s culture and tourism assets was one of four focus areas Daum laid out for the committee, and she highlighted the department’s recent hiring of Noelle Stevenson — who previously led visitors bureaus in Florida’s Broward and Miami-Dade Counties — as Connecticut’s tourism office director

The other three areas Daum plans to focus on are providing technical and financial support for small businesses, administering community development grants and offering tax incentives for companies tied to how many jobs they create.

More workers means more housing

Several legislators said economic growth and population growth in the coming years would depend on the availability of housing. 

“We’re tens of thousands of units of housing behind where we need to be, and employers will not come into the state if there are not the employees,” said Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff, D-Norwalk, co-chair of the committee. “We’ve got to make a commitment in this state to build housing — workforce housing.”

Daum said housing and employment are intertwined. She called attention to the department’s Communities Challenge Grant, which has so far awarded over $80 million to 20 projects around the state — 80% of which incorporated housing developments, Daum said. The grant program just completed its second round, and there are seven more to go.

“That’s the way we’re moving the needle on this issue,” Daum said. 

She added that DECD has encouraged some employers to consider building their own housing for workers, and she said those companies could apply for state-funded community development grants to help cover the cost of construction.

“That application would likely score off the charts,” she said.

Public-private partnerships, where the state, communities, employers and other private funders all have “skin in the game,” are the kind of projects DECD likes to do, Daum said. She added that she expects to be collaborating across executive branch departments on many of her initiatives.

Sen. Joan Hartley, D-Waterbury, said she’s concerned that the advantages Connecticut afforded to people who moved here during the pandemic — more space, for one — won’t be enough to keep them around in the coming years. 

“I think it would be a mistake for us to have our future economic development strategy be based on the advantages that were specific to a pandemic,” Daum responded. “Our strategy going forward, I think, should be based on fundamentals that we know to be true about Connecticut: our workforce and our quality of life and our relative cost of living,” she said.

The committee unanimously approved Daum’s nomination, which now heads to the state Senate for final consideration.


2 virtual meetings will discuss Mixmaster’s future

LIVI STANFORD

WATERBURY – The state Department of Transportation is once again seeking the public’s input on The New Mix Program, which will address the long-term needs of Waterbury’s Interstate 84/Route 8 interchange.

There will be two virtual meetings today: one at noon and the other at 6 p.m. Those interested in participating and listening to the meetings can go to newmixwaterbury.com.

Josh Morgan, spokesman for the Connecticut Department of Transportation, said the public’s input is vital as the agency develops a plan including numerous rehabilitation and replacement options to improve the safety of the interchange.

“We are really forward thinking looking at the environmental, traffic, and business impacts as we look at what the long-term solutions of the interchange will be,” he said.

Waterbury’s I-84/Route 8 interchange, which is commonly known as the Mixmaster, will approach the end of its serviceable life in 25 years, according to the DOT.

Morgan said one of the long-term goals of the project is to reduce the number of crashes in the area and alleviate some of the traffic congestion that builds up during rush hour.

There were 1,365 crashes reported on the I-84/Route 8 interchange from January 2015 through December 2017, according to the latest DOT report on the interchange in 2020.

According to the DOT, in 2017 traffic volumes on the interchanges stood at “approximately 190,000 trips per day, almost double the intended capacity of the system.” By 2045 the DOT estimates that number is expected to reach close to 225,000 vehicle trips per day.

Morgan said the DOT is also examining how the interchange is built out to accommodate pedestrian and bicycle traffic.

Mayor Neil O’Leary said the project is in its infancy stage of design and engineering.

He added that the DOT has already proposed changes to make the interchange safer by the closure of the I-84 eastbound Exit 21 off-ramp in Waterbury.

O’Leary said he is hopeful the project will bring growth to the grand list and new employment opportunities.

Morgan said some options the DOT could pursue for the interchange include reconstruction and rehabilitation which would involve no major changes; looking at ways to shift the interchange and align it with I-84 and Route 8; relocating on-ramps and off-ramps; and looking at alternate travel options.

Morgan said after Tuesday’s meetings, the DOT will hold more over the summer.

“We will continue to take feedback and conduct public outreach between meetings as we screen alternatives with the Project Advisory Committee and stakeholders,” he said.




January 30, 2023

CT Construction Digest Monday January 30, 2023

Developer wants to transform former Stamford Savings Bank into 11-story, 4-star boutique hotel

Jared Weber

STAMFORD — About four years after receiving its proposal, the Stamford Zoning Board could be only a month away from greenlighting a downtown hotel project.

The Old Towne Hotel project would convert the Stamford Savings Bank building at 160 Atlantic St. beside Veterans Memorial Park into an 82-room boutique hotel with a ground-floor restaurant and rooftop patio. The project was initially referred to the Zoning Board by the Planning Board in early 2019.

The building, formerly the headquarters of now-First County Bank, was built in 1940 for about $238,000, according to a May 1951 article in The Advocate. A 2022 valuation appraised the building at about $3.27 million, city building records show.

Architects designed the two-story building with a “conservative New England” style in mind, according to a February 1939 article announcing its proposal. The red-brick building is built on a base of solid granite, with 27-feet-high limestone columns lining its facade.

The renovation would add nine additional stories atop the existing structure. Previous plans had the high-rise tucked behind the bank building.

According to city building records, the bank was acquired in June 2019 by Old Town Square LLC, a company run by business partners Nagi Osta and Shalinder Nichani. Osta is the owner and founder of Nagi Jewelers, a High Ridge Road family jewelry business that’s been open since 1980.

Osta said Nichani, who owns eight hotels, approached him with the idea. He said it would provide needed activity for a corner that is “a bit neglected,” and provide a high-end hotel option for downtown.

“We want to make it high end — hopefully four or five stars,” Osta said. “People like that. It’s going to be … something different for downtown, especially for those luxury apartments (nearby).”

The hotel's theme will also honor veterans, in keeping with the city park outside its facade, he said.

"We've gotten a letter of support from the Stamford Veterans Park Partnership," attorney John Leydon, representing Old Town Square, said at a Zoning Board public hearing Dec. 5. "We're going as far as naming rooms, if that will be allowed ... they have programs at the park where they're going to use our hotel, we assume, for guests coming into speak at events."

At the public hearing, the Board requested several changes to the project, including a complete redesign of the building's rear, which previously would have included a loading dock, dumpsters, electrical transformers and a guest entrance. On Monday night, Leydon requested four more weeks to present the revisions.

The group has not decided on what restaurant would go downstairs, but Osta said it would be a fine dining experience.

The city announced last month that downtown business leaders, through the Stamford Downtown Special Services District, had received a $5.6 million state bond to remake the nearby Atlantic Street ramp to make the area more walkable and friendlier for non-motorists.

Osta said the hotel project and re-imagined street would help to remake the area.

“It’s going to be much more pedestrians (and) safer. Much more urban living. This is going to be good for Downtown Stamford and this is going to be the finishing touch,” Osta said.


Should federal grants favor highway repair over expansion?

JEFF McMURRAY

Arizona officials refer to a notoriously congested stretch of desert highway through tribal land as the Wild Horse Pass Corridor, a label that's less about horses than the bustling casino by the same name located just north of where the interstate constricts to four lanes.

With the Gila River Indian Community's backing, the state allocated or raised about $600 million of a nearly $1 billion plan that would widen the most bottleneck-inducing, 26-mile section of I-10 on the route between Phoenix and Tucson.

But its bid for federal grant money under the new infrastructure law to finish the job fell short, leaving some advocates for road construction accusing the Biden administration of devaluing those projects to focus on repairs and mass transit.

“Upset would be the right terminology,” Casa Grande Mayor Craig McFarland said of his reaction when he learned the project won't receive one of the law's first Mega Grants the U.S. Department of Transportation will announce this week. “We thought we had done a good job putting the proposal together. We thought we had checked all the boxes.”

The historic federal investment in infrastructure has reenergized dormant transportation projects, but the debate over how to prioritize them has only intensified in the 14 months since President Joe Biden signed the measure.

The law follows decades of neglect in maintaining the nation’s roads, bridges, water systems and airports. Research by Yale University economist Ray Fair estimates a sharp decline in U.S. infrastructure investment has caused a $5.2 trillion shortfall. The entire law totals $1 trillion, and it seeks to not only remedy that dangerous backlog of projects but also build out broadband internet nationwide and protect against damage caused by climate change.

Some of the money, however, has gone to new highway construction — much of it from the nearly 30% increases Arizona and most other states are receiving over the next five years in the formula funding they can use to prioritize their own transportation needs.

For specific projects, many of the biggest awards available under the law are through various highly competitive grants. The Department of Transportation received around $30 billion worth of applications for just the first $1 billion in Mega Grants being awarded, spokesperson Dani Simons said.

Another $1 billion will be available each of the next four years before the funding runs out. Still, the first batch has been closely watched for signals about the administration's preferences.

Jeff Davis, senior fellow at the Eno Center for Transportation, said it’s already clear that the Biden administration plans to direct a greater share of its discretionary transportation funding to “non-highway projects” than the Trump administration did. However, with so much more total infrastructure money to work with, Davis said, “a rising tide lifts all boats.”

For example, one of the projects that the administration told Congress it had chosen for a Mega Grant will widen Interstate 10 — but in Mississippi, not Arizona. Davis said the department likely preferred the Mississippi project due to its significantly lower price tag. This year’s Mega Grants combine three different award types into a single application, one of which caters specifically to rural and impoverished communities.

Some of the winning grants are for bridges, while others are for mass transit — including improvements to Chicago’s commuter train system and concrete casing for a rail tunnel in Midtown Manhattan.

Along with the nine projects selected, transportation department staff listed seven others as “highly recommended” — a distinction Davis said makes them clear front-runners to secure money next year. Arizona’s I-10 widening effort was part of a third group of 13 projects labeled as “recommended,” which Davis said could put them in contention for future funding unless they’re surpassed by even stronger applicants.

But such decisions remain largely subjective.

Advocates for regions such as the Southwest, where the population is growing but more spread out, argue that their need for new or wider highways is just as big of a national priority as a major city’s need for more subway stations or bicycle lanes.

Arizona state Rep. Teresa Martinez, a Republican who represents Casa Grande at the southern end of the corridor, said she was livid when she heard from a congressional office that the administration might have turned down the I-10 project because it didn't have enough “multimodal” components.

“What does that even mean?” she said. “.... They were looking to fund projects that have bike paths and trailways instead of a major interstate?"

Testifying in March before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg assured Arizona Democratic U.S. Sen. Mark Kelly that he understood the state's unique highway needs and that his department wouldn't “stand in the way of a capacity expansion where it's appropriate.”

Some Republicans, however, remain skeptical, in part due to a memo the Federal Highway Administration distributed in December 2021, a month after Biden signed the bill. The document suggested states should usually “prioritize the repair, rehabilitation, reconstruction, replacement, and maintenance of existing transportation infrastructure” over new road construction.

Although administration officials dismissed the memo as an internal communication, not a policy decision, critics alleged they were trying to circumvent Congress and influence highway construction decisions traditionally left to states under their formula funding.

Last month the Government Accountability Office concluded the memo carried the same weight as a formal rule, which Congress could challenge by passing a resolution of disapproval. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, the ranking Republican on the Environment and Public Works Committee, pledged to write one.

According to figures the Federal Highway Administration provided to The Associated Press, 12 capacity-expansion projects have received funding through previous competitive grants since the memo was issued. States also have used their formula funding toward 763 such projects totaling $7.1 billion.

As for the Arizona project, some state officials have expressed plans to move ahead on their own if they can't secure federal money — although they're not giving up on that, either. Considering that one crash can back up traffic for miles between the state's two largest cities, they say it remains a top priority.

McFarland, the Casa Grande mayor, said perhaps the next application will stress some of the other components of the $360 million request besides the highway widening — including bike lanes that tribal leaders have long sought for some of the overpasses.

“If you read the tea leaves, you can see where they're at,” McFarland said. “... It's a competitive process. You don't always get it the first time you ask for it. So, ask again.”

McMurray reported from Chicago. Associated Press writer Josh Boak in Washington contributed to this story.


Quinnipiac University's new $45 million recreation center part of plan to 'nurture the community'

Chatwan Mongkol

HAMDEN — From a fitness center and dance studio to a smoothie station, rock garden and rock climbing wall, a new $45 million building at Quinnipiac University has it all.

“If I look familiar, I was the guy on the treadmill grasping for oxygen while all of you young people are exercising with your headphones on having a great time,” said Robert Potter, a trustees and a university alumnus.

Potter said when he first went to the gym, he immediately texted university President Judy Olian and Chief Experience Officer Tom Ellett that “I’m re-enrolling.”

University officials, along with students, faculty and local community members, officially opened the new Recreation and Wellness Center in a ribbon-cutting ceremony Friday, with the goal of providing students with “social, emotional and physical well-being support.”

“You’ve got to take yoga or spin classes or mindfulness or aerobics or zumba while looking at the Sleeping Giant,” Olian said. “If that doesn’t make you happier and healthier, I don’t know what will.”

Olian said the new building is an embodiment of a pillar in the university's strategic plan to nurture the community while reinforcing the vision of Quinnipiac being “the university of the future.” The building also was designed for LEED gold certification from the U.S. Green Building Council, according to the university.

Ellett said the building is “run by students for students,” with a goal of hosting weekly programs for three to four nights a week on top of other activities that will take place daily

“I’m excited that students will gain confidence in themselves, their purpose for being at QU and abilities to go out into the world as active contributors and Bobcat alum,” Ellett said

Student Government Association President Owenea Roberts said she hoped her peers will take advantage of the new facilities — “myself included, because I currently do not exercise,” she said.

The rock-climbing wall inside the Recreation and Wellness Center at Quinnipiac University.

Chatwan Mongkol/Hearst Connecticut Media

The $45-million building also is home to the university’s partnership with Hartford HealthCare. The university’s student health services merged with the health system last year in a $5 million deal. The agreement was to grow the Connecticut health care workforce by creating a career pipeline for students and expanding nursing and medical programs at Quinnipiac.

“Fantastic, fabulous, strategic and collaborative” were some adjectives the university president used to describe the partnership Friday. Jeff Flaks, president of Hartford HealthCare, said his team was “enriched by the culture” at Quinnipiac since the project started.

“What I really want to bring attention to today is the leadership of this university from the board to the president and to the entire team,” Flaks said. “It wasn’t just the innovation, the big thinking, but it was the personal advocacy of the health and well-being of the entire community.”

Through the partnership, the university already increased the size of nursing placement by 22 percent, according to Flaks, and is increasing placement for the medical school over time, too.

Leaders of the two institutions both said the partnership is “great for Connecticut” for “building the workforce of the future.”

Quinnipiac began construction of the Recreation and Wellness Center in 2021, and partially opened the building to students last fall. 

The construction prompted Quinnipiac to try to move its tennis courts to a new location with both Hamden and North Haven campuses under its consideration. The relocation hasn’t been accomplished after two years, and the zoning applications were withdrawn after facing challenges with Hamden zoning ordinances and opposition from neighbors

Associate Vice President for Public Relations John Morgan said, “we’re continuing to explore the best location for our tennis courts and plan to proceed with an application for them once that analysis has been completed.”

In 2022, Quinnipiac received zoning approval to begin another construction for its $293 million South Quad project for three new buildings under a planned development district, something that wasn’t well received by neighbors.

The ongoing project is expected to be complete in the 2024-25 academic year, according to the university.


CT developer continues $15M construction to transform historic Middletown buildings into housing, dining, more

Cassandra Day

MIDDLETOWN — The city's central business corridor is undergoing extensive rehabilitation work to revitalize four historic buildings downtown into a development featuring restaurant spaces, some two-dozen housing units, an extensive wine bar, a rooftop patio with river views and much more.

In all, Durham developer Dominick DeMartino, who owns properties around the state, will be investing $15 million in these ambitious projects. He chose Middletown because he’s “very connected” to the city and active in numerous area organizations.

“This is not a developer coming in and trying to make it quick, and run,” he said.

Construction is underway for 10 housing units in the top two stories of 418-22 Main St., where, on the ground floor, the original Amato’s Toy & Hobby was located in the 1970s, as well as Vinnie’s Jump & Jive dance hall, which closed in late July. 

Signage has been removed from both storefronts, which are now covered in wood. These spaces haven't been fully used for decades, DeMartino explained.

At the rear, near the Melilli Plaza parking lot entrance to Sicily Coal Fired Pizza at 412 Main St., Fresh Cutz, a barbershop specializing in urban hairstyles with other locations in Hamden and Wallingford, will be moving in. Owner Javier Colon will have 15 chairs for stylists to rent, said DeMartino, who owns the Sicily building.

Colon also will offer barber license training for young men and women who want to get into the trade, he noted.

There will also be three retail spaces, including one selling gourmet cookies and ice cream, as well as the wine bar in association with Sicily restaurant in the building DeMartino also owns.

The wine bar will offer all of the Italian eatery’s menu items, as well as a selection of 72 different wines by the glass. There will also be 3,000 bottles on display. “It will be extremely unique,” the developer said.

The raw bar will include clams, oysters, shrimp, as well as cheese, vegetable and dried meat charcuterie boards.

At the former Schlein’s Furniture building at 584 Main St., between 5,500 and 6,000 square feet of retail space will be constructed, with a tapas / Latin eatery on the ground floor, although DeMartino hasn’t yet identified tenants.

He has an application in to the city to build 12 market-rate apartments — six on each floor — geared toward young professionals, college students, medical workers and those “who live and play on Main Street,” the developer said.

In the old Woolworth’s building at 428 Main St., most recently occupied by Irreplaceable Artifacts, there will be a restaurant located below a rooftop patio bar overlooking the Connecticut River.

DeMartino said several restaurateurs have contacted him about possibly securing a space in the buildings. “They’re very interested in downtown Middletown as they’ve seen the success Sicily is having,” he said.

The roof area will be ADA-compliant with the addition of an elevator, so everyone has access to the upstairs, and can dine in full view of the water on summer days, DeMartino added.

The Woolworth’s building is being used temporarily for a series of storefront displays as part of the Downtown Business District’s plan to liven up the streetscape and fill vacant spaces. 

Dominick, who doesn’t charge for use of the ground floor by the organization, has been working with coordinator Sandra Russo-Driska on the project, he said.

As part of the initiative, in November 2021, Haiti native and local artist Pierre Sylvain created three vibrant paintings of Caribbean musicians and diners, which cover the bottom facade of the building.

Prior to that, Middletown resident and Hartford research scientist Kat Owens incorporated a full-size fabric replica of a sperm whale using plastic making its way into oceans and endangering marine animals.

Through next month, Haddam artist Ted Esselstyn, who runs City Bench, upended the furniture he has crafted from reclaimed city trees across the state. They stand among upright slabs of wood to create the effect of a “forest” of trees in the storefront.

“Dominick DeMartino’s investments in downtown Middletown are really invigorating — not only the level of businesses he plans to bring here, but the [care] he takes in renovating the buildings,” said Russo-Driska, who called him a “phenomenal partner” with the DBD.

“We’re truly excited to have him here, and we hope other investors do more in our downtown,” the coordinator added.

DeMartino said he’s received much support from area business owners as well as city officials. “Middletown is moving forward,” he said.


No town funds needed for Groton Long Point Road Bridge replacement

Kimberly Drelich

Groton ― The Town of Groton won’t have to pay for the planned replacement of the Groton Long Point Road Bridge over Palmer’s Cove, saving about $1.7 million in town funds, according to town and state officials.

The town originally had anticipated it would participate in a program in which it would have to pay 20% of the estimated $8.4 million cost to replace the bridge. But the town recently was accepted into a newer program in which the town would not have to pay anything toward the project cost, according to town officials.

The program places the state in charge of the bridge replacement process. The project will be paid for through at least 80% federal funds, with the state providing up to a 20% match, according to a letter from the state Department of Transportation to the town.

“Being part of the 100% program will save the town from spending approximately $1.7 million of their own funds on the project,” said Town Manager John Burt. “The state is also well suited to do this work, and it frees up our public works staff time.”

Burt said design and permitting is scheduled for 2023-2024, while construction is slated for 2025-2026.

The town wants to replace the 1935 bridge, which connects Groton Long Point and Mumford Cove to the rest of Groton, and improve its condition, make it safer for pedestrians, cyclists and drivers, and make it more resilient to storm surge, according to a presentation over the summer.

The Town Council Committee of the Whole on Tuesday recommended moving forward with the funding program, with the full council slated to take a final vote to approve it at its Feb. 7 regular council meeting.

Public Works Director Greg Hanover told councilors that under this new federal local bridge program, called the Design Managed by State Program, the state would take the project through design, permitting and rights of way acquisitions, and manage the contractor during construction. He said the town will still be involved in providing input throughout the design and construction phases and there will still be a public input component to the project.

Last summer, town councilors looked at a preliminary design from engineering firm AECOM for an elevated bridge that included two bike lanes and a sidewalk. The Groton Long Point Association Board of Directors asked the town to remove from the project a sidewalk from the bridge to East Shore Avenue.

Burt said the Town Council did not endorse a design. The town will send to the DOT all the materials related to the bridge, including the preliminary design, and the state will be gathering more public input.

At Tuesday’s Committee of the Whole meeting, Town Councilor David McBride asked about the association’s involvement. He said the association had information it was prepared to discuss in July, but his understanding is that the association has not been able to do that. He said the Groton Long Point Association firmly believes it owns the road. He said he is fully in favor of the project, but thinks it is going to be delayed if Groton Long Point isn’t involved.

“I’d like to see if we can bring them to the table and see if we can move this long,” McBride said.

Burt responded that the state will make its own decisions on the project, and the town will see what the state believes as far as ownership and if sidewalks make it into the design.

Josh Morgan, spokesperson for the state Department of Transportation, told The Day that the Groton Long Point Road Bridge project is in the early stages of development and will be designed to meet state and federal standards.

The bridge is owned and maintained by the municipality, but since it is more than 20 feet long, the state DOT inspects it, Morgan said.

As part of the DOT’s Local Bridge Program, a pilot program was started in 2016 for municipally owned, state inspected bridges, in which the state DOT would partner on the design for future improvements. This speeds up the design process for projects and unlocks additional federal funding opportunities, Morgan explained. “Due to the 2021 federal infrastructure law, these projects in the Local Bridge Program no longer include municipal tax dollars and are entirely funded with state and/or federal dollars,” he said.


State says it won’t pay New London for school demolition work

Andrew Brown

New London may be forced to pay several million dollars in demolition and remediation work for a new high school project because local officials allegedly heeded the directions of Konstantinos Diamantis, the former leader of Connecticut’s school construction program.

Officials with the Department of Administrative Services, which houses the state’s school construction office, recently informed the city that it will not pay for any of the roughly $4 million in demolition or abatement work at the New London High School because that contract was never put out to bid, as state law requires.

“Work that was not competitively bid or work that was done using a state contract without obtaining multiple quotes is not eligible for reimbursement at any rate,” said John McKay, a spokesman for DAS.

Elected leaders and school construction supervisors in New London said that news came as a surprise to them, considering Diamantis allegedly instructed the city to hire a demolition contractor from a short list of state-approved vendors.

It’s unclear if any other school districts in the state could face similar problems obtaining state reimbursement for work that was performed on local school projects in recent years.

McKay said the state would need to do more research to determine if other municipalities neglected to open bids for some of the contracts for local school projects in the past.

But the allegations that Diamantis pushed municipalities to hire certain contractors are not new, and they are not unique to New London.

The Kosta Diamantis timeline

After a federal investigation into the school construction program burst into public view last year, local leaders in several towns and cities came forward to accuse Diamantis of pressuring them to hire specific contractors for local school projects, including demolition and abatement companies.

Diamantis, who resigned from his post in late 2021, a few weeks after the state was subpoenaed by a federal grand jury, denies ever instructing New London, or any other school district, to choose a specific contractor for demolition and abatement work.

“I want to be clear. I never directed anyone to hire a particular vendor, and I did not instruct members of my team to advocate for any,” Diamantis told the CT Mirror this week. He laid the responsibility for any errors on a former subordinate who died in December 2021.

But officials in New London argue that the city is being unfairly punished for following the past directives of Diamantis and his team.

Dianna McNeill, who has served as a senior manager for the New London High School project, said the city hired AAIS, a company based in West Haven, without a formal bidding process due to directions they received from Diamantis and his staff at the Office of School Construction Grants and Review.

McNeill told the Mirror that she considered those directions, at the time, as a “bit of a head-scratcher” because she had never seen a demolition or hazardous waste remediation contract awarded in that fashion for a school before.

But, she said, New London officials complied with the order because it came from Diamantis, who had significant authority over school construction and the state grants for those projects.

“Again, it came from the guy at the top,” McNeill said. “New London was following his direction.”

After the contract was approved, McNeill said, Mike Sanders — another former staffer in the state’s school construction office — stepped in to personally direct AAIS at the high school project. And she said Sanders pre-approved the more than $4 million in work that the company performed at the site.

Based on those circumstances, McNeill and local elected leaders in New London do not believe the municipality should be on the hook for those construction costs.

Three state Democratic lawmakers representing New London — Rep. Christine Conley, Rep. Anthony Nolan, and Sen. Martha Marx — sponsored legislation this session that would require the state to reimburse the city for the work performed by AAIS.

Conley argued this week that New London should not be punished for following the advice of Diamantis, who served as the director of the school construction program for roughly six years.

“The schools were told to use a certain company, and that they did not need to bid it out,” Conley said. “And the schools followed what they were told by the person who had the job.”

Diamantis said anyone claiming he instructed New London to hire AAIS for the high school project was seeking to make him a scapegoat.

Local school officials were allowed to use the list of state-approved contractors for work on school projects as long as they obtained quotes from multiple companies on that list, Diamantis said. But he never suggested or ordered local officials to use the state-approved list of vendors in order to simply pick one from the list or otherwise circumvent the normal bidding process, he said.

Other districts have made similar claims

Officials in New London, however, aren’t the first to allege that Diamantis personally ordered them to ignore the state’s bidding requirements and to hand a contract to a demolition and abatement company that was pre-selected by the state.

An executive and an attorney with Stamford Wrecking, another demolition company, sent numerous letters to Attorney General William Tong and other state officials in 2020 and 2021 alleging Diamantis was encouraging municipalities to side-step state law.

One of those letters, sent to Josh Geballe and Melissa McCaw, the former leaders of DAS and the state Office of Policy and Management, mentioned the New London High School project. And it alleged that the contract AAIS received for the project was arranged because of “overtures” by state officials.

Diamantis responded to those letters at the time by dismissing many of the concerns from Stamford Wrecking. In internal emails, he referred to the company’s attorney as a “well known shabby complainer.”

Local leaders in Groton and Bristol echoed many of the allegations that were presented in those letters last year. In the case of Bristol, local officials provided documents to the CT Mirror that detailed what was communicated by Diamantis and his team at the time.

One of those documents described how Sanders issued a “directive” to Bristol officials — reportedly on behalf of Diamantis — instructing the city to throw out the bids they received for a school demolition project and to hire Bestech, a company selected by the state.

Both Bristol and Groton eventually chose to ignore those directions, and unlike New London, the two municipalities hired their own contractors for the demolition and abatement work using a local bidding process.

Diamantis: ‘Issues were corrected’

Diamantis told the CT Mirror he had nothing to do with those contract disputes in Bristol or Groton. And he said that if anything like that transpired in New London, it would have been the fault of Sanders, who died in December 2021 from a suspected drug overdose.

“If that happened early on, it was Mike’s error. He was new to the program. It was certainly not intentional,” Diamantis said. “And I am speaking for Mike, God rest his soul.”

The disputes that arose in Bristol and Groton, Diamantis said, were isolated to a few schools, and he said he quickly moved to fix those mistakes.

“Those issues were corrected,” Diamantis said, “and Mike Sanders was made clear that he was not to go to school districts and tell them to do anything with respect to how they run their project.”

According to Diamantis, the only reason New London officials are pointing the finger at him now is because they don’t want to get stuck covering the cost of the demolition and abatement contract for their new high school.

“Continuing to slander me with inaccurate statements or false statements for the failures of professionals hired to know the process and to follow a simple process will no longer be tolerated,” Diamantis said in a follow-up email. “I do not know what happened in New London.”

“Hopefully we are clear on the facts,” he added. “I ran a solid program with a great team. We took pride in our work and our program in the best interest of the kids, and no community was forced to hire anyone.”

Conley said she and her colleagues in the legislature are simply trying to correct an issue that was created by the state.

Officials at DAS said they are required to follow state law when it comes to reimbursements for school construction projects.

That means the agency’s can’t reimburse New London for those costs unless the legislature approves special exemption for the New London project.

Conley said she expects the General Assembly to pass that legislation this year.


January 27, 2023

CT Construction Digest Friday January 27, 2023

Port Authority to Ask for Added State Pier Dollars, Lawmakers Seek to Rein in Contracting

Brendan Crowley

HARTFORD – As the Connecticut Port Authority prepares to ask the state for additional money to finish its $255.5 million (and counting) New London State Pier redevelopment, lawmakers are once again trying to rein in the quasi-public agency’s controversial methods for contracting work.

Despite public denials by authority officials, it’s been clear since at least October that construction setbacks in transforming the pier into a heavy-lift platform capable of handling offshore wind turbines would raise the cost of the project beyond the funding that was budgeted.

Connecticut Port Authority Chair David Kooris also admitted to Hearst Connecticut this month that the authority would likely ask the state for additional money, after promising lawmakers last May when they approved another $20 million in bond funds for the project that it would be the “final tranche” of funding they would ask for. 

About $353,000 of the $255.5 million of funding for the project remained in October, a number that the authority says remains the most current figure for the project.

Eversource and Ørsted have deflected in the past questions regarding their willingness to offset the rising costs beyond their initial $75 million investment in State Pier. When completed, the pier is expected to be a hub for their offshore wind partnership to ship out wind turbines for projects off the coasts of Rhode Island and Long Island starting this summer.

As the cost of the State Pier project – initially pegged at $93 million – continues to escalate, some state lawmakers are looking at the authority’s contracting processes that have drawn criticism since the project began. 

State Sen. Cathy Osten, D-Sprague, and State Rep. Christine Conley, D-Groton, have filed bills that would prohibit quasi-publics like the Port Authority from charging “success fees” to contractors, and bar construction managers on quasi-public projects from bidding for work on the project’s they’re overseeing.

According to a report from CT Mirror, Omaha-based Kiewit – one of the largest construction firms in the U.S. and the project manager for the State Pier redevelopment – used its position to push the authority to select it as the subcontractor for at least $87 million in work on the project. In some cases, according to the report, Kiewit convinced the authority to select its bids even when they were higher than competing offers. 

The final cost of the project is still unclear, and the Port Authority says the “final path forward” to complete the project will depend on ongoing negotiations between the Port Authority and the offshore wind partnership of Eversource and Ørsted, which the Port Authority board will discuss at a Feb. 21 meeting. 

But Osten said her main concern is the conflict of interest in having one company as the construction administrator oversee itself as a contractor. 

The proposed legislation would bring rules for quasi-public agencies in line with rules for state agencies, whose project managers cannot bid to perform work on the projects they’re overseeing.

“I’ve been told that they do this all the time in the private sector, but this is public sector dollars,” Osten said. “So, if this bill should get a public hearing, it would be to debate whether or not a contract administrator or manager should have the ability to bid on sub-components of a project of which they would be overseeing themselves.”

The proposed ban on “success fees” takes aim at a $523,000 payment the Port Authority paid Seabury Capital in 2018 as part of its contract to find a port operator for the State Pier.

The watchdog State Contracting Standards Board released a report last year questioning the legality of that fee – and also questioning whether the authority had the power to partner with private companies to redevelop the pier.

State law doesn’t allow agencies to pay “finders fees” to contractors, and the board said the fee paid to Seabury amounted to the same thing. The Port Authority argued that it was not subject to the state rules, and that it was common practice in the industry.

But Attorney General William Tong released a written opinion this week concluding that the authority did have the power to sign public-private partnerships when it made an agreement with port operator Gateway, Eversource and Ørsted to outfit the pier for wind turbines. Tong’s opinion said he was not taking a stance on whether any particular agreement was legal. His office has not yet said whether the success fee was allowed under state law.

“My understanding is the Attorney General is going to give a ruling, but as of this moment that hasn’t happened,” Osten said.


Gateway salt complaints discussed at Montville meeting

Kevin Arnold

Montville ― The Gateway salt saga continues.

At Tuesday night’s Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, residents addressed the commission about the disruption they say the facility is causing.

Crystal Daigle of Gair Court addressed the commission on behalf of her husband, Richard, who was at work, but had addressed the Town Council on Jan. 9.

Daigle reiterated their concerns about noise levels and trucks lining up on Depot Road. Because the trucks can block both exits to Gair Court, she said she is concerned about residents, as well as funeral processions, getting blocked by the trucks. Comstock Cemetery is next to Gair Court on Peter Avenue

She said her and other neighbors don’t feel safe walking around the neighborhood with dump trucks and tanker truckers parked on the sides of the road. She wondered why tanker trucks were necessary.

“He just wanted me to keep telling you guys about this until something is done because we had no vote on this or anything,” Daigle told commission members. “It just happened without anyone in the neighborhood knowing.”

Richard Daigle told Land Use and Planning Director Liz Burdick via email Tuesday that “I definitely want to be on record that I object to anything that is going on down there at the Thames River old Mill property because I believe the traffic studies are wrong.”

The Gateway facility is located at the former home of the AES Thames Cogeneration Facility, which shut down in 2011, and WestRock Papermill and Packaging plant, which closed in 2020.

F.A. Hesketh & Associates Inc. of East Granby conducted a traffic impact analysis prior to Gateway’s approval by the commission last July, and projected a typical increase of 10 trips per hour to and from the site during the summer and 25 per hour in the winter, with occasional pre-storm spikes of up to 65 trips per hour.

The report also said the facility would operate 14 hours a day, from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m and concluded that the roads in the area have the capacity to handle the increase in traffic.

Gateway attorney Harry Heller explained to the commission that not only was the site plan approved by the commission, but that it complies with all regulations and is in a industrial zone. He said it has been an industrial zone since the town adopted zoning in 1970.

Heller said that with 65% of the town’s industrial-zoned land has been eliminated and re-zoned since 1970, the Gateway land is a “critical component of economic development.”

He directly addressed the concerns raised by the Daigles, who Burdick said are the only ones to submit complaints to her department, though they say others in the neighborhood have complained. Crystal Daigle told the commission that other residents’ schedules don’t allow them to attend meetings.

Heller said that to reduce noise Gateway will install bumpers on the tailgates of its dump trucks and replace the backup alarms with OSHA approved ones that don’t make the typical beeping sound.

Heller added that the site can accommodate 30 trucks on the property and that trucks will not line up on Depot Road. As seen in the site plans, the facility has a one-way driveway to stage the trucks which are then loaded with salt and weighed before exiting the loop.

Though he could not say that the site will never do so, Heller said the facility is not designed to operate continuously at night.

“Obviously we want to welcome new businesses into our town, but it’s greatly affecting our neighbors,” Town Councilor Colleen Rix told the commission.

Rix, the council’s liaison with the commission, added, “We are all residents and we want our residents to feel comfortable.”

Burdick addressed the commission Tuesday and further explained in an email Wednesday that she and Mayor Ron McDaniel met with Gateway officials last Friday. She said they confirmed what Heller had said, and added that the salt pile would be covered this week, an issue raised by critic Kevin Blacker.

Gateway also said that the conveyor will eventually extend all the way to the salt pile, thus eliminating the need to transport salt by truck from the pier to the pile. The company added that equipment operators had been directed not to drop their buckets after loading the salt to the trucks as a way to reduce noise.

“Our department is taking this seriously,” Burdick said Tuesday. “The mayor is taking it seriously.”

She told the commission that going forward, the company told her that there will be no overnight operations, even in the event of a snow storm.

Burdick said in the email that she has been in constant communication with Gateway representative, James Dillman. She said Dillman told her on Wednesday that the terminal opened for business last week and had one truck per day until Tuesday, when nine trucks visited the facility.

Dillman also said that the salt pile was covered, a state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) requirement. Zoning Officer Meredith Badalucca conducts regular inspections of the site and, on Wednesday, reported that the pile was in the process of being covered.

Dillman explained that the tanker trucks Mrs. Daigle referenced were actually part of the construction process by Coit Excavation to remove storm water from the Gateway site and catch basins during the work.

Burdick also noted that there is an ongoing dam repair in the vicinity of the neighborhood at Gay Cemetery pond. The repairs are overseen by DEEP and not the town.

Blacker, who told the Town Council that these issues are a direct result of displacement of conventional cargo from State Pier in New London, shared similar sentiments with the commission on Tuesday.

“The noise is going to be a serious problem,” he told the commission.


Next phase of Meriden flood control includes demolition of vacant buildings

Michael Gagne

MERIDEN — The city’s ongoing effort to reduce flooding along Harbor Brook continues with the demolition of vacant structures on city-owned lands along Hanover and Butler streets. 

Late last spring, the city advertised a bid request for contractors to demolish the former Castle Bank at 100 Hanover St. and to demolish a former power house located on the city-owned property at 104 Butler St.

The Norwich-based firm Wiese Construction was awarded the contract to demolish both buildings. The total cost of the entire project is $699,900, said City Engineer Brian Ennis. 

Demolition of the former power house at 104 Butler St. began this week. 

Ennis said the building previously underwent remediation of hazardous materials and was partially demolished. The facility used to generate power for International Silver Company’s former Factory H plant.

“There was an old boiler, with asbestos insulation in the boiler, and two underground fuel storage tanks that needed to be pumped out and removed. All that work has been done,” Ennis said. 

Similar remediation of the former Castle Bank building also has been completed. Ennis explained the hazardous materials that were removed from that site included PCBs, or polychlorinated biphenyls, caulk, and materials, which included flooring, that contained asbestos. 

After the demolition of both buildings is complete, both properties will become open space, Ennis explained. 

“There’s never going to be any development on there,” Ennis said. 

The city engineer explained that the next phase of the Harbor Brook flood control project will include extending the Linear Trail along Harbor Brook and the old Factory H site itself, at 116 Cook Ave.

“And that’s going to come through at the 100 Hanover parcel. So there’s going to be some landscaping… We’re going to pretty it up a little bit. It’s going to be like a small pocket park,” Ennis said. 

The grading of that side will be cut down to provide both storage and landscaping, Ennis said. 

Officials are not planning to build trails or to make other improvements at the 104 Butler St. site, other than feeding it with what Ennis called a “wildlife mix.” The property will be maintained by city crews annually. 

Ennis said the purpose of the demolitions is to remove the buildings. 

“We’re going to drastically alter the floodplain when we get into the next phase of the project,” he said. 

The city awaits additional funding — $15 million — to complete an extensive flood control project that runs from Cooper Street to South Colony Street. That project, Ennis said, is in “semi-final design.”

Officials plan to send that project out to bid next winter. Ennis said it would be completed over the course of two separate construction seasons. It will consist of two bridge replacements, along with widening of the Harbor Brook channel in that area. 

“If we get all of our funding in place, we will be replacing the bridges during the construction season of 2024, and then doing the channel improvements in the next construction season in 2025,” Ennis said. 


Contamination complicates Bridgeport's sale of Sikorsky Airport

Brian Lockhart

BRIDGEPORT — It could cost millions of dollars to clean up tainted dirt at Sikorsky Memorial Airport, and responsibility for that hefty bill has to be determined before the city can move ahead with the pending sale of the facility.

"There's no doubt we continue to have an interest in seeing that airport developed, but this is a formidable issue that we have to get behind us," Kevin Dillon, director of the Connecticut Airport Authority, said Thursday. “It comes down to there’s a big number that needs to be dealt with and we're looking at different paths to deal with it.”

The CAA for at least a year has been negotiating with Mayor Joe Ganim's administration to purchase the Bridgeport-owned, Stratford-based aviation facility for $10 million. According to Dillon, the environmental assessment his organization commissioned as part of those talks was recently completed and estimated the potential ground remediation to be in the $4 million to $16 million range.

The state property transfer law which would apply to Sikorsky's sale to the CAA requires "the disclosure of environmental conditions when certain properties and/or businesses are transferred (and) that a party signing the property transfer form certification agrees to investigate the parcel and remediate pollution caused by any release of a hazardous waste or hazardous substance from the establishment."

Dillon noted there would have to be further phases of study to determine a more specific price tag, which would cost a few hundred thousand additional dollars, shifting the total price tag range further upward to the $6 million to $19 million range.

"We knew we were going to have to deal with this environmental piece at some point," Dillon said, noting that was one of the requirements stated in a "term sheet" the authority's board approved last February outlining the requirements of a purchase.

That document specified, “The existence of contamination and required remediation may affect the date of sale and, possibly, the city’s ability to sell the airport.” 

"The thing that's probably new ... is the size of the potential liability," Dillon said. "When you start talking about a $10 million acquisition price and a cleanup of $4 million to $16 million, you have to really take a step back and say, 'Where are we going with this from a financial standpoint?'"

But Dillon and Daniel Roach, a Ganim aide, said the analysis' results are not a deal breaker and there are ways to move forward.

"It has not been determined if there’s other responsible parties (for the tainted dirt), so those numbers could be mitigated by others having to contribute to the cleanup costs," Dillon said. 

He also noted that when state lawmakers created the CAA over a decade ago to take over operating Connecticut-owned airports from the state Department of Transportation, the terms specified that should any future development at those sites require environmental remediation, the state would be on the hook to pay for it.

That could at least delay a pricey cleanup at Sikorsky, but not put it off indefinitely given the Ganim administration's and the CAA's desire to expand services there to make the site more economically viable.

"As you develop that property and start to disturb soils ... you're going to have to deal with whatever contamination would be on those sites potentially before you could move forward with the construction," Dillon said. 

Roach said the sections of the land most likely to be developed in the future are areas believed to have "the least amount of problems."

And, he added, the cleanup criteria could differ depending on usage.

"It's been functioning like every other airport with environmental issues," Roach said. "It's not like we're looking to put a day care center there."

Asked how the environmental contamination at Sikorsky compares to that at Bradley International in Windsor Locks and the five other Connecticut airports in the CAA's portfolio, Dillon said, “On an individual basis, I think the issue at Sikorsky is certainly more significant.”

Dillon also acknowledged that negotiations could shift from the CAA acquiring Sikorsky to instead leasing and managing it. That landlord/tenant relationship had also been floated when the CAA and Gov. Ned Lamont in November 2021 first announced efforts to have the authority assume management of Sikorsky from Bridgeport.

“That’s a potential," Dillon said. "A lease document becomes far more complex than a sale document, and that was one of the reasons why we started to go down the road of actually purchasing the airport. ... But that’s always a possibility.” 

Proponents of the sale of the airport to the CAA have argued it is the best way to upgrade the facility, revive the long-dormant commercial passenger operation there —  the complex currently caters to business, charter and private flights — and pursue other changes to make Sikorsky a more successful operation.

The $10 million asking price is based on the estimated funds Bridgeport has sunk into the airport over the last several years. Because so much federal money has been invested there, it is not treated as a typical real estate deal and the city cannot sell it at a profit. 

But the Ganim administration had counted on the purchase being finalized by the end of 2022 when last spring the mayor and City Council approved the current 2022-23 municipal budget, balanced with $4 million of that $10 million.

Bridgeport City Council President Aidee Nieves said Thursday she has been worried about what the results of the CAA's environmental review might be.

Nieves is also a member of the city's airport commission, which last May voted to move forward with a deal with the CAA and reject an offer from Stratford Mayor Laura Hoydick for her town to buy Sikorsky instead.

Hoydick represents Stratford on the commission and was the only member to vote "no." A final deal would still need to come to Bridgeport's City Council.

In the near term, Nieves said, the Ganim administration will need to figure out how to plug the $4 million budget hole before the current fiscal year ends June 30.

"I never really felt we'd get the deal done in less than two years," Nieves said.

As for what to do about the tainted ground at the airport, Nieves, who initially had opposed a sale, said, "I don't want to be responsible for a $16 million cleanup" but also recognizes the city cannot simply unload that problem onto another entity.

"I don't want to be stuck with the bill, nor do I want to be a 'junk car' salesman," Nieves said about whether to sell or lease Sikorsky. "What is the lesser of two evils? ... What is the least financial impact on our taxpayers?"

Hoydick on Thursday said given the tens of millions it is taking to remediate the Raymark site in town and the age of the airport, which Bridgeport purchased in 1937, the potential cost of cleaning up Sikorsky is not surprising. Raymark is a former auto parts manufacturing plant listed as a federal superfund site.

"It's old infrastructure and things need to be improved," Hoydick said of the airport. "'But I think the reward is great. Obviously the CAA thinks so, too. So we'll see what happens."


New Haven planners delay Tweed New Haven airport parking vote amid storm runoff concern

Mark Zaretsky

NEW HAVEN — Nearly five hours of public testimony on Tweed New Haven Regional Airport's application to add 34 parking spaces in the more distant of its two front parking lots yielded no immediate decision, but City Plan Commission members were moved enough by neighbors' concerns about runoff to want to study it further.

The commission opted late Wednesday to leave the public hearing open and resume at a special meeting Feb. 25. 

The proposed additional spaces were removed from a previous application for 203 spaces approved in October because the 34 spaces involved moving a fence within a regulated inland wetlands and coastal management area. Parking has been an issue at Tweed as Avelo Airlines continues to grow. During holiday peak periods, between Thanksgiving and Christmas, existing parking came close to filling up some days.

A petition to add Tweed neighbor and expansion opponent Gabriela Campos Matteson, who wanted to bring in her own environmental scientist, as an intervenor in the application failed by a 2-2 vote. Chairwoman Leslie Radcliffe and member Joy Gary voted in favor. Joshua Van Hoesen and alternate Carl Goldfield voted against it.

Three votes were needed for it to pass.

But after hearing several of the more than 15 members of the public who addressed the commission express concerns about potential runoff — from a project that a lawyer for airport operator Avports said amounted to "moving a fence" within an already-paved area  — Radcliffe wanted to know more.

She initially raised the possibility of the commission hiring its own environmental consultant. Van Hoesen suggested asking the city's Environmental Advisory Council to do research and weigh in.

But after Avports representative Andrew King asked whether installing a runoff treatment system might "be an appropriate measure" and City Plan Department Executive Director Laura Brown offered to act as a liaison, members agreed to let them discuss ways to address concerns between now and the next meeting.

"I'm not comfortable with closing the public hearing at this point. There's just a lot out there that I want to know," said Radcliffe.

Radcliffe pointed out that if contaminants "are going back into the waterways," as some suggested, "I don't think a fence is going to stop that."

Joe Williams, attorney for Avports, said "the only regulated activity that we've applied for is moving the fence within the paved area," and a sedimentation and erosion control plan is part of the application.

The application was complicated by two cease-and-desist orders city Building Official Jim Turcio issued in November and December after a contractor installed a fence that had not yet been approved.

"We were in the middle of a transition between adding new management personnel" and a contract "started the work and it was noticed," King said. "... They notified the city and the work stopped."

Williams said the parking is intended to be temporary and would be in use until a proposed new terminal and new parking lots can be built on the East Haven side of the airport.

King said that even if the current application isn't approved, the area covered by the current application "will be used for 'airport ops' ... Whatever the airport needs at the time, whether it's parking or staging or overnight parking for planes."

Goldfield told his colleagues, "If we don't approve this, they're going to use that for materials storage. ... They're going to continue to use it the way that they're using it, because they have every right to."

Ray Paier, an environmental engineer with Westcott & Mapes, said an existing fence that was installed without approval "is going to be removed. That's part of this application." The proposed new fence would be driven into the pavement about 50 yards west of the current fence, he said.

During public testimony, resident Margaret Wheeler said, "We're not here just to complain. We're here to bring facts," and "the main idea here is to protect the wetlands." She said Tweed's parking lots "are within 50 feet of the wetlands area."

East Haven shorefront resident Lianne Audette said that when there's runoff from the parking lot, "all sorts of things will be in that water, and water will move. This bothers me a lot, because there's a lot of crap in that water and it will move into the wetlands."

Laura Cahn of Cleveland Road, who chairs the Environmental Advisory Council , said that "even an inch of soil moved disrupts the wetlands" and this application would move considerably more than that. "I would like to hear a soil scientist" discuss the effects, she said.


After Danbury’s career academy encounters new complications, city zoners bend the dimension rules

Rob Ryser

DANBURY — The city’s plans to retrofit a corporate campus into a career academy for 1,400 upper grade students ran into new complications as soon as the city received permission to rezone the 24-acre site from industrial to residential, and thereby permit the school.

“We did just go in and revise the zone to a residential zone which unfortunately drove us to have to get (a) variance (for) the building height from 52 feet to 55 feet,” said Antonio Iadarola, the city engineer, during a public hearing earlier this month. “The other thing is in the (residential) zone we are really only allowed to have a three-story, but the existing building is a four-story, so unfortunately due to the change in the zoning, it does require us to have you endorse the existing condition of the four-story building that is currently out there right now.”

And that wasn’t all.

“The (side yard) setback for a (residential) zone is 50 feet but unfortunately we only have 38 feet,” Iadarola said. “This is an existing condition.”

Iadarola further had to dispel concern that the city was adding two stories atop the existing building in a residential zone.

“I had several calls where people thought we were raising the height of the building 20 feet,” Iadarola said. “That is not the case at all.”

People may have gotten that idea because the city’s variance application said it proposed to increase the height of the building from 35 feet to 55 feet.

The good news is the Zoning Board of Appeals was more than willing to bend the rules to accommodate the city’s most important infrastructure project. The bad news is the Zoning Board of Appeals didn’t follow its own rules when it approved the variances on Jan. 12.

As a result, zoners had to call a special meeting a week later to revote and correct the technical error.

ZBA Vice Chairman Juan Rivas called it “a technical error that transpired at the meeting of Jan. 12 where two alternates who voted favorably on the variance request were not seated by the chair to vote as regular members.”

If it sounds like the city is pressed for time, it is.

Leaders acknowledged earlier this week that the city will miss the career academy’s target opening date of August 2024, and the $164 million project will not be ready until the start of the next school year in August 2025.

That means city schools will have to suffer another year of overcrowding in a district that was counting on a new high school and a new middle school to start the 2024-2025 academic year.

The reason: failed negotiations with The Summit in February 2022 to locate the career academy at the 1.2-million-square-foot complex sent the city scrambling for an alternative with no room for error. Although the city promptly found a “better fit” at the former Cartus Corp. site on Apple Ridge Road, it took four months for the seller to remove a non-development deed restriction on 12 acres of the property, which the city insisted on before buying it.

That was four months the city didn’t have.

“Although we anticipate being able to finish the project well before August of 2025, you can’t open up a school of this size in mid-year,” Iadarola told The News-Times this week.

Schools Superintendent Kevin Walston said the district planned to implement the career academy model in 2024-25, but without the new west side facility.

Meanwhile the city continues its plans to retrofit the 260,000-square-foot office building overlooking Danbury Fair mall into a high school and middle school.

On Wednesday, Danbury’s Environmental Impact Commission gave the city the green light to build near environmentally sensitive land.

In addition to the two schools, blueprints call for new district offices and the add-on construction of a gymnasium.

“This project will not have any immediate or direct impact on the wetlands,” Iadarola told the environmental commission. “All the work on this project is in the 100 foot (buffer) and consists of removing pavement and putting down new pavement, converting existing pavement into grass area and restoring the storm water basins to their original configuration.”


CT Port Authority rightfully formed partnership for State Pier, Tong says

 Brian Scott-Smith

State Attorney General William Tong said the Connecticut Port Authority was within its rights when it hired a harbor management company to operate the State Pier in New London as a hub for the offshore wind industry.

The legal opinion came Tuesday at the request of the State Contracting Standards Board to look into whether the port authority was allowed to enter into a public-private partnership.

Tong said the port authority was allowed to make these agreements with Gateway, Eversource and Ørsted in 2020.

The law changed the following year when a legislative amendment curbed any quasi-public agency from establishing any new public-private partnerships. That power is now limited to the state Department of Transportation.

Andrew Lavigne, the manager of business development and special projects, said, “The attorney general’s opinion is welcomed confirmation” of the port authority’s statutory authority.

Acting State Standards Board Chair Robert Rinker said they are reviewing the legal opinion, but he raised concerns about how the state should interpret public-private partnerships where quasi-publics are involved.

“The Connecticut General Assembly may wish to address this during their current legislative session,” he said.

The state attorney general’s office is still investigating the $500,000 success fee the port authority paid to its consultant Seabury Capital for finding the State Pier project a contractor.

This story was first published Jan. 25, 2023 by WSHU.


Wallingford approves $34M for police station

Kate Ramunni

WALLINGFORD — The Town Council this week approved bonding more than $34 million to turn the former 3M office building into the town’s new police station, though several council members again expressed concerns about the issue of meeting minutes indicating the recommendation to make an environmental report “disappear.”

The council voted 8-1 to approve amending the ordinance previously approved that bonded $3.3 million for the purchase of 100 Barnes Road to add $31,548,000 for the renovations to building, bringing the total to $34,848,000.

But hanging over the vote was the issue of the Police Station Steering Committee minutes of its Oct. 13, 2022 meeting, where architect Brian Humes made a comment that he would recommend a report that mentioned the issue of PCBs “disappear.” Republican Councilor Craig Fishbein brought up the minutes of that meeting at the council’s Jan 10 meeting.

Fishbein said that night that he found the comment troubling, and on Tuesday said one reason he did was because of the situation in Fairfield where four town officials are facing charges regarding the illegal disposal of PCBs. When he read the steering committee meeting minutes, that raised a red flag for him, he said.

“If the report wasn’t that bad, why make it disappear? Why did no one at meeting question that statement? Is that statement of practice so common that OK, it’s just another one we’re going to make disappear?” he asked. “That’s the takeaway from the recording, and because there was no rebuke one could assume that that overture was acceptable and that the action was undertaken, and that’s troubling. I totally agree we need a new police station, but I’m just really concerned about whether I can vote on this with the veil of what is going on.”

“I would assume Mr. Humes would agree that he expressed his opinion, on the matter of testing for PCBs, in an unsuitable way and that he unintentionally misspoke,” Democratic Councilor Sam Carmody said. “What I have an issue with is that Mayor Dickinson intentionally held a press conference to deny that such statements, referenced in the meeting minutes were ever said, and a draft report mentioning PCBs ever even existed. The mayor’s press conference not only emphasized wrong information, but it also left a bad taste in the mouths of many because of its inaccuracy and because of its poor tone. I think this whole debacle has been stirred up mainly because of the erroneous information that was shared by our mayor at his press conference last week.”

Carmody said that while he often disagrees with the mayor’s policy positions, he feels he “can always be trusted, that your words are always truthful and that your intentions and devotion to our town are noble.

“While I think your intentions and devotion to our town remains unchanged, I am disappointed, and I have to question the trustworthiness of this administration after witnessing last week’s press conference. You got it all wrong,” Carmody said.

Councilior Joseph Marrone also said the press conference was a misstep on the mayor’s part.

“At the press conference the comment was made that someone was trying to impugn the integrity of the committee. The act of impugning the integrity of the committee was reading the committee’s minutes, and that was the item that was so offensive it required a press conference,” he said. “I am rather embarrassed that we had to have a press conference and the facts were misstated. I don’t understand how at this level of government these kinds of things happen. I think the reason these things are happening is because we are in a crisis. We have kicked the can so many times down the road that now we need a police station or bust. The building is on fire and we’re in an emergency now.”

Councilor Christina Tatta, who was the only member to vote against the bonding, said she too was disturbed by the press conference, especially the light it cast on the steering committee’s recording secretary, Cheryl-Ann Tubby.

“Several times in the meeting it was said that the integrity of the steering committee was impugned because of the questioning of the minutes. It was also said the minutes were inaccurate. However, after comparing the audio and the minutes, the minutes were a direct quote, and I feel Ms. Cheryl Ann Tubby, the recording secretary, deserves an apology for her competency being impugned by those statements,” Tatta said. “I’ve known Ms. Tubby to be outstanding at her job, and seeing her name on the minutes, I was sure that they were accurate because she always does a very good job. So to see her job be publicly brought into question, and wrongfully so as it turns out, that affects her career.”

Tatta asked that a public apology be made to Tubby and be included in her personnel file so it is not an issue for her going forward. But Dickinson said he has not read the minutes and did not say they were wrong.

“I indicated that the minutes are a summary — they always have been. I don’t believe I ever said they were incorrect,” he said. But to rely solely on the minutes as proof of guilt over the suggestion of making a report disappear is wrong, he said.

“To take minutes and from that deduce that people are intentionally committing an unlawful act I find highly irresponsible,” he said. “If you’re going to accuse people of a very serious act of hiding or destroying public records, then you need to look at more than minutes in your collection of evidence. That, to me, is impugning the character and intentions of people who are serving the community.

“I haven’t read the minutes. I didn’t characterize the minutes as incorrect or correct,” he said. “My concern is that if there is a belief or deduction of that kind, more evidence has to be collected than to read minutes of a meeting.”

New building needed

Ultimately everyone on the council agreed the town needs a new police station. Plans for one have been in the works for years, with acknowledgments that the department has outgrown its current home at 135 North Main St., which got serious in 2021 when the town bought the Barnes Road property.

In 2007, former police chief Douglas Dortenzio submitted a report to the council on why the town needed a new police station, current Chief John Ventura told the council. Those plans were then estimated to cost $22 million, “but because of the economic downturn that happened, that was a nonstarter,” Ventura said, referring to the recession of 2008-09.

In the intervening years, “the problems at 135 North Main St. did not stop,” Ventura said. The town bought that building, the former Armory, in 1983 and renovated it into a new police department that officers moved into three years later.

But by 1992, only six years later, it was clear that the department had already outgrown that building, Ventura said. The design of that building is poor, he said, with “cavernous” hallways leading to small cramped offices.

Multiple chiefs, same plea

Dortenzio came to the council in 2009 to plead for its support for a new station, and in 2020 former chief William Wright did the same.

“There is no thermostats in the building — it’s either hot/very hot or cold/very cold. You can’t set the temperature in the building,” Ventura said. Last August, when they tried to fire up the boilers, they wouldn’t turn on so they had to have a company come in, he said. “They did get them started, but it’s a constant struggle to keep them running.”

The air conditioning system, too, is very old and when in use the department must have the company come in at least once a month to keep it running, Ventura said. “It’s not an easy system and my training officer has been converted to almost building maintenance unfortunately because he’s on top of all the contractors that need to come in,” he said.

Other features in the old building are downright dangerous, Ventura said, calling the cell block system “archaic.” The security system monitoring the cells is located outside of the cells, rather than in them as is the case with modern stations, so being able to see what is going on in the cells is difficult, he said.

“That cell block is a lawsuit waiting to happen,” Ventura said. “I personally had to run down there and cut someone down from the bars who was trying to injure themselves. It’s a huge liability.”

It also can turn into a crisis when a prisoner decides to flood a cell block, Ventura said. “What we need to do — and I’m not exaggerating when I say this — is we need to find the smallest officer that’s working and put them through a door to manually crawl into the space behind the cell blocks to turn the water off.”

Modern systems have controls in the cell or outside of it so it is much easier to contain such a situation, he said.

There’s no temporary holding area to isolate a prisoner being booked so have to have another officer there for safety when booking someone, Ventura said. And space for officers is also limited, especially in the locker area.

“We have locker space for one female officer,” Ventura said. “I have six female officers and if we fill vacancies with female officers, I don’t have room for them.”

Such is also the case in the men’s locker room, he said. The male locker rooms are at capacity and are not large enough to accommodate equipment such as bullet proof vests and helmets, so those are often stored outside the lockers. There are no electrical outlets in the locker room so officers have to charge equipment at home or find a place in the building, he said. There are two showers that offer no privacy whatsoever, he said, and when a prospective employee sees these conditions, they are often turned off.

“For a female officer to walk in and see that, it’s not appealing,” he said, “and there’s a lot of other departments that they can go to with newer buildings and equipment.”