March 30, 2023

CT Construction Digest Thursday March 30, 2023

CT to experiment with speed cameras. Here’s what that means for drivers.

Mark Pazniokas

The unblinking eye of cameras will begin enforcing the speed limits at highway work zones in Connecticut in a tightly constrained pilot program that begins on April 10, the day after Easter.

To Carl Chisem, the experiment is long overdue. As the president of Connecticut Employees Union Independent, Chisem represents 3,600 state employees, including 1,500 at the Department of Transportation.

“The data does not lie,” Chisem said Wednesday. “In the last four years, there have been 3,674 crashes, resulting in 13 fatalities and 32 serious injuries in work zones alone.”

A simple memorial in the DOT lobby lists names of the 13 and 24 other workers killed in work zones. Where someone might ordinarily leave flowers, there are orange traffic cones marked CT DOT and wrapped in black ribbon.

Gov. Ned Lamont joined Chisem, DOT workers and others in a parking lot near the DOT headquarters in Newington to publicize the start of a pilot program that transportation officials hope will become a permanent check on reckless drivers.

“It’s gotten pretty dodgy since COVID,” Lamont said. “A lot of people driving like a bat out of hell. It’s these folks who are at risk.”

They stood by a white SUV equipped with cameras linked to automated systems that will issue tickets. Cars sped by on the Berlin Turnpike, occasionally drowning out the speakers.

“What if this press conference was scheduled for behind a set of cones on I-95 at midnight — or even better, after the bars get out?” asked Donald J. Shubert, the president of the Connecticut Construction Industries Association. 

The highway construction season is a three-season affair, with overnight shifts common.

“Construction workers are going to be out there eight to 10 hours a night, spring, summer and fall, focusing on their fellow employees, the trucks, the heavy equipment and the quality of their work with their backs towards the traffic,” Shubert said. “Think about that. How would you feel?”

On the night of Nov. 16, 1995, David Ferraro was a construction inspector in a closed southbound lane on I-95 in Greenwich, about 1,000 feet from the New York border, when a motorist sent safety cones flying, struck a truck and sped away.

“It was at the beginning of the night at the point where all workers were preparing to start paving,” Ferraro said. 

He felt the impact of the cones, not realizing he had been hit by the car until a trooper pointed to his torn and bloodied jeans. Troopers caught the driver in New York. He was drunk.

Ferraro said things only have gotten worse.

“Over my years on the job, I’ve seen it all,” he said. “People not just going five or 10 miles an hour over the speed limit, they’re going 30, 40 or plus miles an hour over the speed. So what can we do to slow people down? We do this by joining other states around the country and adding automated speed control devices and cameras to active construction projects.”

The General Assembly has placed tight limits on the DOT: Only three camera-enforcement vehicles can be used at one time, each limited to a work site posted with signage warning motorists of automated speed enforcement.

The cameras are unblinking, but they are programmed for leniency: They cannot issue a ticket unless someone is 15 miles per hour over the limit.“This is not that complicated. Don’t drink and drive. Don’t tweet and drive. Stop speeding,” Lamont said. “Look at the wrong-way deaths. We see what’s happening to pedestrians getting hit. And look at the folks behind me.”

Behind him were DOT employees and private-sector construction workers.

“These guys are going to be really busy for the next 10 years. We’re upgrading our roads and bridges in a way that the state hasn’t seen since Dwight Eisenhower,” Lamont said.

Eisenhower was the president who pushed for passage of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 and the creation of an interstate highway system not deemed to be finished until 1992.

Garrett Eucalitto, the DOT commissioner, said the agency will compare speeds at work sites before and after the cameras are deployed to measure their effectiveness. He must report results to the legislature at year’s end.

The DOT currently is seeking authorization to use the cameras on local roads.

“We’ve seen it in New York City. We’ve seen it in Philadelphia,” Eucalitto said. “We don’t want to put them everywhere. But it’s a good tool to have to help save lives and reduce crashes.”

Speed traps seemed to have disappeared during COVID. 

Col. Stavros Mellekas said staffing has limited their deployment, but they are out there. And in state police parlance, speed traps do not exist.

“We don’t call them speed traps,” he said. “We do motor vehicle enforcement.”


Construction employment increases in 45 states

Zachary Phillips

Construction employment increased in 45 states in February compared with a year ago, according to analysis of federal employment data by the Associated General Contractors of America. 

Texas saw the largest number of jobs added, increasing by 37,900, or 5%, from February 2022 to February 2023. West Virginia saw the largest drop, losing 2,200 jobs, or 6.5%, over that time period.

From January to February, construction employment increased in 24 states, held steady in six and declined in 20 and Washington, D.C. “Unfavorable weather may have held back construction in many states last month compared to January,” said Ken Simonson, the AGC chief economist. “But construction employment continued to expand almost everywhere in February compared to a year ago, despite a slump in homebuilding.”  

Most construction firms report trouble finding enough workers to keep pace with demand. Many contractors are opting not to bid on projects as a result, because they simply do not have the staffing to complete and deliver the work, according to AGC.

AGC officials have urged Congress and the Biden administration to increase funding for career and technical education and to open doors to permit foreign workers with construction experience to more easily enter the country legally.

The Department of Labor has recently announced initiatives to train and employ women and minorities — underrepresented groups in construction — so that they can find a strong career path and fill the gap in demand. The agency hopes the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act will create an opportunity for workers seeking good-paying jobs, who then realize their future in construction.

Nevertheless, the gap is wide. The IIJA will likely continue to push demand higher. Even as large infrastructure projects come to town, builders are competing over a small pool of staff for their work.


Developer proposes larger Fairfield Metro multi-use project

Josh LaBella

FAIRFIELD — The developers of a massive mixed-use development in town are proposing changes to their project.

Accurate, the development company which bought the Ash Creek Boulevard property last year, presented its plans to the Town Plan and Zoning Commission in a meeting Tuesday night. The project has been stymied for nearly two decades, and Accurate has stated it will finally build the mixed-use residential and commercial development.

According to town documents, the concourse building, which was originally going to be a 30,000-square-foot commercial space, will now be expanded with plans to include a hotel. The proposal also calls for building 674 apartments, up from the original 357.

Accurate aims to create the "vibrant, transit-oriented community first envisioned several years ago a reality," according to the plan. In order to do that, plans say, it will submit several land-use applications and zoning amendments to the town, and is seeking a pre-review from the TPZ. 

Commissioners asked about parking, stormwater drainage as well as what type of commercial businesses would fill the space.

The developers said there would be retail and restaurants, noting there would be a business center, stores and other types of companies.

Commissioner Lenny Braman said the new designs are an improvement on what was previously approved in many ways. Commissioner Daniel Ford shared similar sentiments, but said there might be objections from neighbors about the scale of the concourse building. 

Commissioner Meg Francis also said she liked the plan. 

"It's more attractive than it was and I really commend you for it," she said, adding it would not bother if they decreased the amount of the project dedicated to housing.

The proposal notes Accurate is seeking to reconfigure what was originally approved so that the apartments will be spread out across seven buildings ranging from three to five stories in height. As part of that, the plans call for a pedestrian plaza in front of buildings 6 and 7, which will be surrounded by 10,000 square feet of commercial or residential amenity space. 

Accurate said it wants to make the concourse building a landmark building in the community, later adding it will be eight stories with a train depot for commuters, office space, a hotel and restaurant uses. 

"The Concourse will contain approximately 41,400 square feet of office space, and 118 hotel rooms," it said. "Two below-grade parking levels are also contemplated."

In order to facilitate this, Accurate is proposing changing zoning regulations to allow for building heights of up to 125 feet on the property. For the apartments, it is requesting increasing the amount of bedrooms allowed per acre to 39 from 20. 

To allow the increased number of apartments, Accurate is looking for the town to approve an increase in bedrooms per acre from 20 to 39. The proposal notes there will be 874 bedrooms in the development's 674 apartments. It also proposes that 80 of the units be restricted as affordable. 

In the plan, Accurate notes that the town can use the affordable units to earn points under the 8-30g system. A state statute, 8-30g allows developers to bypass local zoning laws if building affordable housing in a town where less than 10 percent of housing stock qualifies as affordable. 

The proposal said that 79 percent of the development will be residential while the remaining balance will be for non-residential use. 

"The contemplated modifications to the approval and zoning regulations will help achieve the highest and best use of the property, provide much needed housing and support economic growth within the town," it said. 

Shovels hit the dirt on the project last fall, after years of delays, with town officials and the developers expressing excitement at the time that work was underway. First Selectwoman Brenda Kupchick said she was on the Representative Town Meeting when the town entered into an agreement with the state and a developer for the property.

Accurate is the third developer working on the project since Blackrock Realty proposed a massive development around Fairfield’s third train station with the goal of making it a hub of commuter and shopping activity. Blackrock Realty contributed $5.4 million to the construction of the station in exchange for the rights to build its initial commercial and residential project connected to the station.

Initially proposed in 2005, the development was to have roughly 1 million square feet of mostly office space with a mix of retail and a hotel elements.

Those developers had wanted to pre-lease a lot of that office space before beginning construction, but found the demand for it had dried up after the 2008 economic crash. Blackrock's project went through a number of revisions after that, including proposals for a five-story, 197-unit apartment building.

The site is the former location of a foundry, and development of the site had long been a topic of debate, with officials saying the property has been vacant for too long. Construction on Building 4, which will host apartments, started last year. 


Connecticut commercial energy storage demand spurs government action

JOHN FITZGERALD WEAVER

Connecticut has initiated the second tranche of its statewide commercial energy storage program, aimed at incentivizing 100 MW of battery deployments while continuing to support its residential program.

In the first round, 46.4 MW of commercial and industrial energy storage was approved, with a total energy capacity of 139.4 MWh. The projects average 3 hours of capacity per hour of peak power output.

The residential program recently surpassed the 1 MW sign-up milestone and has ample space in its first round, which targets 10 MW of deployed capacity.

The program is managed by Energy Storage Solutions and administered by the Connecticut Green Bank. The state aims to deploy 1 GW of energy storage by 2030, with interim targets of 300 MW awarded by 2024 and 650 MW by 2027.

Residential customers can receive an upfront incentive of approximately $200 per kWh of battery capacity, with the maximum incentive capped at $7,500. Multiple batteries can be combined to achieve up to 37.5 kWh. Several other factors affect the final value, which can be found here.

To qualify, batteries must be accessible by local power companies for use during peak demand periods. Residential battery owners will be compensated based on when and if their systems are used during high-demand periods. The summer season runs from June to September, and the winter season from December to March. The batteries are expected to be used between noon and 9:00 PM.

Batteries from Enphase, Generac, and SunPower have been approved for the residential market. These units can be managed by inverters from Enphase, Sol-Ark, GoodWe and Shenzhen Lux Power.

The legislation also stipulates that low-income, underserved, and “grid edge” located customers qualify for additional incentives. The state has released a detailed map that shows where the edges of the grid are located.

Research by Dr. Christopher T. M. Clack of Vibrant Energy suggests that putting additional solar and storage at the edges of the grid would generate $473 billion in benefits nationally, with $109 billion in California alone.

The first tranche includes 27 projects submitted by six developers, with projects located in 20 towns across the Constitution State.

Of the 1 GW of capacity to be deployed, the law states that at least 580 MW must be located at the point of demand.

The energy storage program is part of Connecticut’s broader goal of achieving 100% clean energy production by 2040. As of 2030, 48% of the electricity sold within the state must come from renewable energy resources.

The commercial portion of the program aims to deploy 100 MW of capacity. Hardware from six manufacturers are approved: Cadenza Innovation, Caterpillar,  Tesla, ELM Fieldsight, Milton CAT and Socomec.

For more on solar policy in Connecticut, read 50 states of solar incentives: Connecticut.


CT Water plans to build solar array in Clinton

Andrew Larson

The Connecticut Water Co. said it will begin construction on a solar array installation at its corporate office and southern region work center in Clinton next month.

The solar array, a combination of roof and ground-mounted units, will completely offset electrical consumption at both facilities, the company said. It will also provide energy for two high-capacity electric vehicle charging stations, as the company electrifies part of its utility fleet.

Connecticut Water president Craig J. Patla said this is the company’s latest step toward its goal of reducing emissions by 50% from 2019 levels by 2030.

In addition to environmental benefits, the solar installation should help stabilize Connecticut Water’s energy costs and keep water costs stable for consumers, the company said. 

The array is expected to be completed in June 2023 and will generate 275 kilowatts of power.

Connecticut Water has installed two other solar arrays, one at the Stewart Water Treatment Plant in Naugatuck, generating 25% of the power needed for that facility, and another in Colchester at the Westchester Village system, which nearly offsets power use for that system. 


US energy officials release strategy to boost offshore wind

JENNIFER McDERMOTT

The U.S. Energy Department said Wednesday it has a new strategy to meet the goal of vastly expanding offshore wind energy to address climate change.

The Biden administration wants to build 30 gigawatts of offshore wind energy by 2030 — enough to power more than 10 million homes. The turbines would be anchored to the seafloor. It wants to deploy another 15 gigawatts of floating wind turbines by 2035, enough to power 5 million homes. The first commercial scale offshore wind project in the United States is currently under construction off the coast of Massachusetts.

Capturing the power of strong wind does not contribute to climate change and can enable the shutdown of power plants that operate on combustion and do pollute, reducing the emissions that are causing the climate to change.

With its Offshore Wind Energy Strategy, DOE lays out a plan for supporting offshore wind development to meet the 2030 targets. It was released during an offshore wind energy conference in Baltimore held by the Business Network for Offshore Wind.

Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm promised in a statement that offshore wind "will create tens of thousands of good-paying, union jobs and revitalize coastal communities.”

The administration is attempting to lower the cost of fixed offshore wind by 30%, down to $51 per megawatt hour by 2030 and support a domestic supply chain for the industry. It also wants to establish the United States as a leader in floating offshore wind and lower its cost by nearly 70% to $45 per megawatt hour by 2035. Another goal is to figure out how to bring large amounts of wind energy onto the U.S. power grid, and advance technologies that use offshore wind to produce hydrogen and clean fuels. Among other uses those can be used to make power even when the wind is not blowing, making an intermittent clean source into one that is closer to 24/7.

To achieve all this, Jocelyn Brown-Saracino, the department's offshore wind energy lead, said DOE is bringing people together to solve offshore wind issues, working with the industry on technology demonstrations and offshore wind research, and financing clean energy projects.

“Our hope is that this outlines a really powerful contribution to advancing offshore wind in the United States,” she said. _______

Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receives support from several private foundations. See more about AP’s climate initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.


In Stamford, 8-month project to replace Cedar Heights Road bridge means detours for drivers

Brianna Gurciullo

STAMFORD — Work to replace a bridge on Cedar Heights Road in the Turn of River neighborhood is scheduled to start next month and wrap up in November.

The bridge, which is south of the Merritt Parkway, near the intersection of Cedar Heights Road and Wire Mill Road, “is being completely removed,” according to a post on the city’s website that includes a link to a detour map

Construction will begin April 3, unless the weather causes a delay. 

Stamford officials have eyed the bridge over the Rippowam River for replacement since at least 2013.

The span was built in 1933 and is considered structurally deficient, said city engineer Lou Casolo. About 3,800 vehicles cross the bridge every day, Casolo said.

“The new structure will be capable of withstanding pressures, velocities, impact and uplift forces from a 100-year flood,” according to a project page on the city’s website.

The project is estimated to cost $2 million, with 80 percent to be covered by the federal government, according to the web page.


West Haven approves Washington School demolition, new design

Brian Zahn

WEST HAVEN — The Planning & Zoning Commission approved the demolition and new construction of Washington School, the next step forward in bringing the 114-year-old school into the future.

In a presentation by representatives from architectural firm Antinozzi Associates and engineering firm Stentec, commissioners reviewed plans for the two-story, 49,000-square-foot building that will accommodate roughly 438 students between pre-K and fourth grade and more than 70 staff members.

Architect Lisa Yates said the current structure, built in 1909, is out of compliance with accessibility requirements and many features of the current building — including narrow stairwells, wide hallways and masonry — make it so renovation is not a feasible option. The new site design notably includes updates expected to address traffic concerns in the area, which are exacerbated during drop-off and pick-up times as passenger vehicles compete with school buses and line Washington Avenue and Brown Street as children walk across oncoming traffic and doors open into the street. 00:00 / 00:32

Engineer Antonio DiCamillo said the new site plan implements a left-turn lane from Washington Avenue into a parking lot that can support about 30 cars queuing at a time; Principal Alicia Limosani said about 70 cars queue daily, but the entire operation moves quickly, taking place in the span of 15 minutes.

“We think you're still going to have traffic in this neighborhood,” said Yates, adding that there was no need to sugarcoat the issue. “We’re just doing everything we can within the context of this new project to do everything this project can do.”

Beyond the queue through the parking lot, the site design adds a separate bus loop on Brown Street and increases the total parking on-site from 52 spots to 74. Officials with the site design said it was the most they could manage on the four-acre parcel without causing other issues, such as reducing the size of a playground or encroaching farther into a floodplain. 

Neighbor Henry Manoni said he has ongoing concerns about traffic, and the plan as presented likely still would lead to cars stopping on the road. He also asked whether any consideration had been taken to preserve a memorial bench on the streetcorner. DiCamillo said the bench would get "special treatment" and would be removed and placed upon a newly-paved area.

The design plans show the exterior of the building will include terra cotta brick and gray stone, materials that officials said were intended to match over civic buildings, such as City Hall and the First Congregational Church.

At Tuesday's meeting, a day after six were killed in a Nashville school shooting — including three children — some commissioners raised concerns about the security of the entrances. Limosani said school staff are "actually pretty neurotic" about ensuring that the doors are secured; the approved new design would create vestibules at entrances with reinforced glass that is expected to protect against break-in attempts for an estimated six minutes.

Neighbor Thomas Sciarappa said the addition of a gymnasium to the building years ago created loud noises that disrupted the neighborhood most mornings around 7 a.m.

"We're people who live there," he said. "I know projects in West Haven do take longer than normal, but God built the world in six days and rested on the seventh. When I get up in the morning this is what I'm going to hear for two years."

Officials said that, although construction can be noisy, construction officials can reserve some of the noisiest functions for later than 7 a.m.

Commissioners said they were pleased with the presentation; the use of materials intended to match the facades of other civic buildings was applauded by several.

Vice Commissioner John Biancur said the application is "certainly not perfect" because of constraints related to the size and location of the parcel, but "it looks as if the applicant is doing as much is possible with everything possible for them.”

"It meets everything as much as is humanly possible to do,” he said.

Commissioners Greg Milano and Gene Sullivan said the building is likely to be in the spirit of the city's Plan of Conservation and Development by attracting new residents.

Yates said the estimated $44.5 million construction project may begin once bids go out in the late summer and may be completed by March 2025. During construction, Washington students will attend school at the presently-vacant Molloy School.


Details on The Riverbank and other projects shared at New London Landmarks meeting

Johana Vazquez

New London ― At an eventful New London Landmarks annual meeting Tuesday, it was announced that Tox Brewing Co. is moving to Bank Street and the Garfield Mills project has begun remediation of its building.

The meeting was held at one of the three adjacent historic buildings owned by developers High Tide Capital at 137, 133 and 123 Bank St. The buildings are being restored and turned into luxury apartments and space for businesses to create a collective development called The Riverbank.

High Tide Capital was this year’s recipient of Landmarks’ Restoration Award for its work on Bank Street and its most recently completed work at the Manwaring Building at 225 State St. where Connecticut College students are being housed.

Landmarks Executive Director Laura Natusch said for many years developers have not taken part in the costly effort to restore historic buildings. She said she hopes High Tide Capital’s work inspires others to do the same.

“These buildings have been vacant for so long,” she said. “It feels like we are finally turning the corner.”

Historian Tom Schuch received the Cliff Stone award for his years of research and work on the Black Heritage Trail. Constance Kristofik received the Volunteer of the Year Award for her documentary about the history of New London’s LGBTQ+ community called “Holding Space for Each Other.”

Landmarks Intern Leslie Ann Melendez presented a video montage as a preview to a project called “Bridging the gap with stories” that will feature the oral histories of two dozen people who grew up in the city’s income-restricted housing projects.

Natusch said she and Melendez would also be working on a documentary in the summer about Puerto Rican migration into the city.

The meeting’s featured speaker was Brian Lyman, the managing broker for Parker Benjamin, a real estate advising and development firm. The firm has renovated 38 Green St. into small studio apartments and is working for High Tide Capital on the Riverbank development and construction. Lyman accepted the restoration award on behalf of High Tide.

Lyman said his firm only works on buildings that have existed pre-1936 and are typically blighted in order to receive certain tax credits to help fund the renovation. He said a lot of infrastructure work goes into the projects with new electric, gas service and sewer systems.

In a presentation, Lyman showed slides of what people can expect from Riverbank. He said the small building at 137 Bank St. would be home to the record store The Telegraph.

At 123 Bank St., the site of the former New London Antiques Center, Lyman said Tox Brewing Co., currently situated at 635 Broad St., would move into the first floor and apartments would be on the top two floors. He said there will be a roof deck on top where residents will have “spectacular views of the harbor.”

At the former site of Jason’s furniture, or 133 Bank St., commercial space for a restaurant is still available on the ground floor and the top three floors will have apartments. Between both buildings there will be 32 one- and two-bedroom luxury apartments.

The apartments are expected to open its doors to its first residents this summer. More information on the development can be found at its website.

Lyman said his firm is also working with Litchfield-based Park Lane Group on the renovation of the Garfield Mill complex at 90 Garfield Avenue into workforce and affordable housing. He said building material at the site will be undergoing abatement for a few months before construction can start.

After the meeting, a group of attendees participated in a tour led by Lyman of the construction underway at 123 Bank St. and stood among exposed steel framing of what will be future apartments.

The attendees talked about how the building once served as the location of Olympic Sporting Goods where they would try on new shoes. Felix Reyes, the city’s director of Planning and Development, reminded everyone that 133 Bank St., the building with the “gorilla” mural in the back, was the subject of a fire last year.

He said the developers called the next day after the fire to re-instate their commitment to the development.


East Lyme sewer commission makes room for senior development

Elizabeth Regan

East Lyme ― The Water and Sewer Commission this week helped a 454-unit proposed senior housing development clear its first major hurdle.

Members on Tuesday voted 6-1 to allocate a majority of the sewer capacity Pelletier-Niantic LLC estimates it needs for 160 condominiums, 144 apartments, and a 150-bed assisted living section, as well as urgent care and radiology facilities that would be open to the public.

The company’s principal is listed as New York-based architect Eric J. Pelletier.

Pelletier’s application asked for 110,000 gallons per day of sewage flow. The request came as officials warned the town is close to capacity in the system designed to send 1.5 million gallons of sewage per day from East Lyme to New London’s Piacenti Water Treatment Facility.

The commission granted a reduced 75,000 gallons per day, which was a more generous number than the 55,000 gallons per day recommended by utilities engineer Ben North.

Civil engineer J. Robert Pfanner, representing the project, described the amount approved by the commission as “fine.”

“We'll never go over that allocation,” he said in a phone interview Wednesday.

The developer could begin filing permit applications with the land use department “maybe in a couple months,” according to Pfanner. Multiple public hearings will be required as the project moves through the regulatory process.

North at a public hearing earlier this month said the project would likely be “one of the last major developments” in town until officials figure out where to find additional capacity for its sewer system.

The commission on Tuesday considered either approving the reduced amount or denying the request. The decision hinged on different interpretations about how much capacity would be available going forward.

Officials said it’s a difficult number to predict because there are potential customers along the town’s sewer lines who are entitled to connect if they choose. That means there’s a pool of customers on septic systems currently who may decide to tie into the sewer system in the future, as well as vacant lots that may eventually contain buildings.

But it’s unknown how many of those possible ratepayers will actually connect.

North estimated there would be approximately 882 gallons per day of capacity left if he factored in all the properties that may or may not connect to the system. If he only looks at existing sewer customers and projects under construction, there would be 137,000 gallons remaining.

Commission member David Zoller said the focus needs to be on the amount of capacity actually being used instead of unreliable projections.

“We can’t stop the growth of this town because of some phantom number,” he said.

But he said the commission has to get serious about looking at ways to find more capacity before it runs out.

Of the 1.5 million gallons per day allotted for sewer lines in East Lyme, 1.02 million gallons are for municipal use while the rest are reserved for the state at sites including York Correctional Institution and Camp Nett.

The town averaged about 708,000 gallons per day in each of the past five years, according to North.

The state used only about 200,000 gallons per day of its 478,000-gallon-per-day allocation, which it currently shares with the private beach communities of Pine Grove in East Lyme and Point o’ Woods in Old Lyme.

Member Carol F. Russell, the lone opposition vote, said she didn’t believe the commission should immediately approve an allocation without having more solid information about where additional capacity might come from and how much it will cost.

Officials at the public hearing said options for increasing capacity could include renegotiating agreements with New London and Waterford or working with the state to access some of its unused allotment.

“We need a new policy in terms of other revenue to help pay for that,” she said, adding one option could be for developers to pick up some of the cost. Another would be for taxpayers to chip in if expanding capacity is going to foster economic development.

Commission Chairman and First Selectman Kevin Seery said the need for additional capacity is clear, but said he didn’t believe it was an emergency situation.

He said the eligible households along the town’s sewer lines would have to connect “abundantly” and in consistent numbers to max out the system over the next few years, which he didn’t foresee happening.

“So I don’t think we’re putting ourselves in a position where, within the next six months or couple of years, we’re going to have a problem with capacity,” he said.

For member David Bond, reserving capacity for customers that may or may not end up connecting is a waste of space.

“As a commission, we’re a business. We’re paying for capacity, we’ve paid for the sewage treatment plant, and now we have all this capacity that we can’t get paid for because people aren’t tied in,” he said.

He said maxing out capacity makes financial sense.

“We need customers,” he said. “All we’re doing every year is going up on our rates.”


225 Middlebury residents show up to stop distribution center

STEVE BIGHAM

MIDDLEBURY – An estimated 225 residents, most of them clad in red, packed the Pomperaug High School auditorium Tuesday night to express their opposition to a proposed distribution center.

The developer, Drubner Equities of Waterbury, is looking to build a 750,000-square-foot “Amazon-like” distribution facility on the 112-acre Timex Corp. campus off Christian and Southford roads, which is for sale, town officials say.

Resident Stacey Brooks said the “monstrosity” being proposed would destroy the town.

The plan is before the Middlebury Conservation Commission, which held its third hearing Tuesday. Another is scheduled for April 4.

If approved, the facility would have 66 loading bays to accommodate as many as 106 tractor-trailers at a time.

Drubner’s attorney, Edward G. Fitzpatrick, told the commission the plan would have little impact on wetlands, just one half of 1%.

“That’s like having 3,000 school buses and only one of them being impacted,” he said.

The applicant brought in several environmental experts who expressed their support for the plan, including herpetologist Dennis Quinn, who said the wetlands on the site have little value, with nearby Interstate 84 and Route 188 having all but eliminated the salamanders, tree frogs and snakes. Most wetlands there are infested by non-native earthworms that do more harm than good, he said.

But residents fear the massive distribution center, with trucks rolling in 24-7, would destroy their community’s small-town feel.

“You are here to protect us. We’re scared and angry. You have the legal authority to stop this,” said resident Sam Dexter, who appealed to the commission’s “conversation consciousness” and to reject the application.

Fitzpatrick pointed out, however, the commission cannot deny the application simply based on a wetlands impact.

“There needs to be a balance between wetlands and economic growth,” he said.

Resident Jennifer Mahr said air, light and noise pollution from the trucks would have an adverse impact on the natural habitat.

“Diesel exhaust creates a cocktail of air pollutants,” she said.

But Commission Vice Chairwoman Mary Barton said those concerns would need to be addressed by the Zoning Commission.

Barton said the issue at hand is to determine if the plan has a net-zero impact on the wetlands and, if so, regulations state the application must be approved.

Environmental experts for the applicant went into detail about the plan to mediate any wetlands impact or water runoff through the use of sophisticated storm water drainage, bio-retention basins and systems.

But resident Bill Pizzuto said no amount of wetlands remediation is as effective as Mother Nature.

“We can’t let enticement of profit supersede our quality of life,” he said.

Resident Terry Jack agreed, noting “man-made wetlands are no substitute.”

Keith Ainsworth, an attorney representing Middlebury Small Town Alliance, which has intervener status, reminded the commission the applicant’s plan constitutes 58 acres of total disturbance.

The 100-acre Timex property is zoned “light industrial,” which does not specifically identify a “distribution center” as a permitted use, though “warehouses” are an allowable use.

Drubner had sought to have Middlebury’s zoning regulations amended to allow for “a specialized warehouse that serves as a hub to store finished goods, facilitate the picking, packing and sorting process, and ship goods out to another location or final destination.”

It also wanted to raise the cap on the permitted height of buildings from 35 to 55 feet.

However, it has since withdrawn those requests, opting to eventually seek zoning approval, even without the text amendments.

Zoning enforcement officer Curt Bosco said the applicant could seek almost the exact same size distribution center, “with almost the same intensity,” under the current zoning regulations, even without any text amendments.

“They allow warehousing in the current regulations in Middlebury. Warehousing is almost the exact definition of a distribution center. Stuff goes in, they store it and stuff goes out. That’s what warehousing is,” Bosco said.

Mahr disagreed, saying Middlebury’s “light industrial” zone prohibits trucking terminals, except for the transportation of goods manufactured on the premises.

“The LI-200 zone is all about the creation of new goods and is not a transportation zone,” she said. “E-commerce is light years ahead of zoning regulations and developers are taking advantage of regulatory gaps to build whatever they want, wherever they want.”




March 29, 2023

CT Construction Digest Wednesday March 29, 2023

DOT Budget Hearing Shows Bipartisan Infrastructure Support

Tom Ichniowski

The initial congressional hearing on President Joe Biden’s 2024 budget proposal for the US Dept. of Transportation showed evidence of continued strong bipartisan support for infrastructure, though the parties differed on the specifics. [View a video of hearing here.]

Also at the March 23 Senate transportation appropriations subcommittee hearing, panel chair Brian Schatz (D- Hawaii), warned about the severe harm that could hit transportation if House Republicans’ reported interest in rolling back domestic discretionary spending to 2022 levels become a reality. 

“Now is not the time to slash critical investments if we want to sustain the progress we’ve made in investing in our infrastructure.” Schatz said, praising Biden’s proposal. “Instead we need to build on that success.”

Committee members quizzed DOT Secretary Pete Buttigieg, the sole witness at the hearing, about recent front-page transportation issues, including the East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment and other rail accidents, as well as airline runway incursions and the March 22 construction work zone accident on the Baltimore Beltway that killed six construction workers.

But infrastructure was a prominent recurring theme during the hearing.

Two key committee Republicans criticized what they termed the administration's proposal to "zero out" in 2024 two prominent DOT infrastructure accounts, the Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity, or RAISE, discretionary grants and Federal Highway Administration bridge funding distributed among the states by formula.

Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (Miss.), the ranking GOP member of the subcommittee, said, "Each of these programs have been very crucial for rural communities, especially in states like Mississippi.”

Sen. Susan Collins (Maine), the top Republican on the full Appropriations Committee, agreed. She said that the funding from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) “was intended to be supplemental, It was not intended to supplant the regular appropriations.”

Jeff Davis, senior fellow at the ENO Center for Transportation, provided more details on Twitter, saying that the budget request would call for eliminating "extra" bridge formula funding that draws in the General Fund. adding that the proposal would eliminate non-IIJA appropriations for RAISE. 

Collins also said the Biden administration “has been very quick to laud the bipartisan infrastructure program, to take credit for its role in shaping it, but now it’s submitted a budget that dilutes its impact.”

Buttigieg acknowledged the popularity and effectiveness of the RAISE program.  

“It’s of course challenging in any budget to make sure that the 'top line' conforms with the President's and the public's and the Congress's expectations about fiscal responsibility," he said. "We sought to strike that balance in the right way, ensuring that there are additional funds for projects, including discretionary programs that we know are very sought-after across the country."


Stamford will get a 471 apartment development along the Rippowam River, a project 8 years in the making

Jared Weber

STAMFORD — After more than eight years of groundwork, plans for a major residential development along the Rippowam River in downtown Stamford received approval Monday night from the city's Zoning Board.

Board members voted 4-0 to approve the development with one member absent. The development will create 471 new apartments in two seven-story residential buildings — one on each side of Clinton Avenue, between Division Street and Richmond Hill Avenue. The building on the road's east side will have 176 homes, while the larger, riverside structure will feature 295 dwellings.

The Zoning Board's decision culminated a process that began almost a decade ago, when the Royal Bank of Scotland consolidated properties in hopes of creating a large site to attract residential developers.

In 2016, city officials approved a general plan for the development. They also agreed to a land swap with RBS to acquire parcels abutting the river, where they hope to build a riverside walking path connecting Scalzi Park to Kosciuszko Park — a central facet of long-term plans to expand Mill River Park.

That portion of riverwalk has yet to be constructed, though. The applicant, New York developer Carmel Partners, said they would build it out in a letter of intent sent to city officials Jan. 24.

The developer requested $1.6 million from Stamford for "designing, permitting and/or constructing" the riverwalk, according to the letter.

"It's an enhancement for the project, too. It's a beautiful amenity for their tenants. So, that's why it is that they want to take it on. They want to achieve this for the city because the fear is that if they don't take it on, we don't know when it'll happen," said the developer's attorney Lisa Feinberg. "It was supposed to already be completed. The city is in default today."

Board members sought further assurance from Feinberg that Carmel Partners would follow through with the improvements but eventually decided to take them at their word.

"The best we can do is hope that the applicant and the city get it together," Zoning Board Chair David Stein said. "I guess they've got to work out an agreement that implements the letter of intent."

About 10 percent of the apartments will be permanently deed-restricted at below-market-rate rents. Officials deliberated increasing the percentage, but Feinberg noted that the general development plan, approved in 2016, specified the figure. Of the 49 on-site affordable apartments, five will be studios, 23 will have one bedroom and 21 will include two bedrooms. Forty-seven apartments will be rented out at 50 percent of the area's median income, while one will be leased at 65 percent and the other at 25 percent.

Both buildings will have parking garages within them. In total, there will be 453 parking spots — 13 of them will be for shared vehicles and at least 37 will be electric vehicle charging spots. An additional 37 spots will be reserved for electric vehicles not being charged.

A total of 108 bicycle parking spots will also be built.

The project was approved with a number of site-specific conditions, which are subject to approval either by the Zoning Board or by the city's Land Use Bureau staff. Among those are an affordability plan for maintaining the below-market-rate apartments, a parking management plan and a fee-in-lieu payment of $41,750 to the city for street trees that the developer will not be able to plant because of utility placement, among other specifications.

Additionally, if fewer than 20 percent of the building's tenants regularly use transportation that's not a single-occupied vehicle in a year, the property owner must submit a plan to the city's Land Use Bureau and Transportation, Traffic & Parking Bureau demonstrating how they will increase that share.

Four people spoke during a public hearing portion earlier in the meeting. Two speakers, Susan Pace and Susan Bell, expressed concerns about the development's impact on traffic on Interstate 95 and the safety of bikers from the apartments crossing nearby North State Street while riding south.

Feinberg said proximity to the train station is important in order to "fight traffic."

"Our transportation department is working really hard to create this multi-mode transportation system so that not everyone is in a car. We want people on bikes, we want people walking and we want them to be safe, so I know that the administration is incredibly focused on that at this time and investing a lot of money in ensuring that's safe. But just because things aren't perfect right now doesn't mean that we want to tell people 'Stay in your cars and clog up the roads.'"


Judge refuses to reconsider probation for Fairfield dumping defendants

Daniel Tepfer

During a hearing Tuesday afternoon, the lawyer for Brian Carey, former Fairfield interim public works director and conservation director, argued that a newly obtained report disputes the dangers of the contaminants used to build a berm around the town’s public works property.

“I believe the court may have been under some misconceptions when you denied accelerated rehabilitation for my client,” Carey’s lawyer, John R. Gulash, argued.

Carey and Scott Bartlett, former public works superintendent, are awaiting trial next month accused of allowing contaminated soil dredged from Owen Fish Pond to be used to build the berm and then trying to cover up that fact.

More than 40 truckloads of debris and dirt were removed from the Stratfield Road pond during a three-week period in 2018.

The newly obtained report, done by the Yale School of Medicine in July 2020, refutes findings in later arrest warrant affidavits that Fairfield town employees were put at risk, handling contaminated material they were assured was safe.

Superior Court Judge Kevin Russo acknowledged he previously made his decision to deny accelerated rehabilitation, a pretrial diversionary program, to the defendants based on the claims in the warrant affidavits that town workers were put at risk. He said the Yale report does not change his decision though.

Holding up a copy of the report, the judge agreed with prosecutors Tamberlyn Chapman and C. Robert Satti Jr. that it would take a trial to determine the accuracy of the Yale report with witnesses and experts testifying on both sides. Something the judge said he is not prepared to do.

In denying the motion, the judge warned lawyers for other defendants in the case not to seek a similar reconsideration based on the Yale report.

Bartlett’s lawyer, Frederick Paoletti Jr., subsequently withdrew his motion for reconsideration without comment.

For the second trial, Carey, Bartlett, Emmet Hibson, the town’s former human resources director and Robert Mayer, Fairfield’s former chief fiscal officer, and developer Jason Julian are charged with multiple counts of illegally disposing of hazardous waste and conspiring to cover up their actions.

In addition, Bartlett is accused of accepting bribes from Julian to allow him to dump contaminated soil on town property. Bartlett is charged in a separate case with larceny for allegedly stealing more than $30,000 from a disabled woman.

Mayer, is also charged with burglary, larceny and forgery charges in connection with the alleged dumping conspiracy.

Robert Grabarek, owner of Osprey Environmental Engineering in Clinton is also awaiting trial in the case as part of the alleged coverup.

Joseph Michelangelo, Fairfield’s former public works director, previously pleaded guilty to the illegal disposal of PCPs, multiple counts of receiving solid waste at an unpermitted facility, disposal of asbestos without a permit, making false representations and conspiracy. He is expected to be a key witness for the prosecution.


Town Council hears pitch for one Wallingford high school, parents object

Kate Ramunni

WALLINGFORD — The Board of Education made its pitch for closing both Mark T. Sheehan and Lyman Hall high schools in favor of a new, state-of-the-art high school on the Lyman Hall campus during a marathon Town Council meeting that lasted more than five hours

The board cited declining enrollment at both schools in choosing to consolidate the high schools. 

But many parents and students don’t agree that decision. Several dozen gathered in front of Town Hall shortly before the 6:30 p.m. meeting began, bearing signs and stories in many cases about how attending a smaller high school benefited them, and how they want that same experience for their children.

“This would have broad permanent negative effects,” said Melanie Rossacci, an administrator of the Facebook group Wallingford Residents Opposed to One High School.

Students do better in smaller classes at the two high schools than they would in one larger high school, she said. Current classes number 17-21 students, while she said they are estimated to rise to 24 students per class at a consolidated school.

“Please carefully consider why school size matters, especially post-pandemic,” she said. Students are less likely to drop out and more likely to continue their education at a smaller high school, she said.

There had been talk of housing a preschool at Sheehan, she said, but that proposal quickly disappeared. That would use room at that school, she said.

"Having two smaller high schools in town is a gift," she said. "Please let us keep that gift."

Edgewood Drive resident Marsha Birkin said she bought her house in 2010, just before the Board of Education reconfigured the elementary schools. Had she known that was going to happen, she might not have bought the house, she said, and now she's against this proposal. 

"There are definitely things you can do other than consolidate," she said. 

Allison Weisburger said her Pond Hill Road home abuts the Lyman Hall campus. "We love having Lyman Hall in our backyard," she said, and being able to hear the activities going on there. But if a new school is built there, the blueprints show that the auditorium would be six feet from their property line. "It would look right into our bathroom," she said.

As a nurse working a late shift at Gaylord Hospital, she would definitely have trouble sleeping during the day with the building that close, she said.

"I don't want the school on top of my property," she said.

Tim Brzezinski is a teacher at Engineering and Science University Magnet School in New Haven. He's taught in small schools and schools with as many as 5,000 students, he said, and he thinks the smaller schools are better.

"We already have what is best," he said.

Council uncertainty

After about an hour and a half of public comment, council members had their turn questioning school officials. It became clear that councilors weren’t sure what was being asked of them — whether the board wanted the council to vote on consolidating the schools.

Several council members said they weren't ready to do that. Councilor Christina Tatta made a motion to instruct the board not to pursue the consolidation, saying it was clear what residents want, but other council members weren't willing to do that either. 

Board of Education Chair Tammy Raccio said what they wanted was the funding to take the next step in determining if building a new, larger school on the Lyman Hall campus was even feasible, but the council also declined to do that.

Several on the council said they have a problem with the location and think if they were to consolidate, a more central location is needed.

While the school officials said they could find no suitable alternative location, Councilor Vincent Testa said he had an idea where the school could go, though he said he did not want to reveal that location until he can get more information. He asked for an item to be added to a future agenda for a discussion on alternative locations.

The school board has been working on finding solutions to facility issues for years. While the middle school buildings are in worse shape than the high school buildings, the board decided to take on the high schools first, Raccio said.

In 2018 the board commissioned a study that projected that over the next 10 years, Lyman Hall enrollment would drop 19% and Sheehan decline by 23%. Both buildings had space limitations that would limit program expansion, the study found, and maintenance at both would need more investment over that time frame.

A survey done at the time, to which 2,294 responded, found that 44% of residents preferred to renovate the town’s two middle schools and two high schools at a cost of $78 million. Thirty-five percent of respondents favored renovating the middle schools and consolidating the high schools, at a cost of $120 million, and 21% preferred a three-year maintenance plan at a cost of $19 million. Because that survey was conducted five years ago, those estimates in today’s dollars would be higher.

Last year, the board undertook a facilities master planning study that reported a 1.64% decline in the town’s population between 2010 and 2020, while the state population grew by 0.27%.

Between 2012 and 2022, enrollment declined by 964 students, of which 350 were high school students, and is projected to go down another 93 students between October 2022 and October 2023, according to the study. 

Lyman Hall was built in 1957. The 199,002 square foot building houses 936 students. At 217,035 square feet, Sheehan is slightly larger and it’s also newer, having been built in 1971. Its enrollment is 734 students.

The study estimates it would cost $104,474,612 to renovate Lyman Hall as new, and $113,944,813 to renovate Sheehan as new. With state reimbursement, the projects would cost Wallingford taxpayers $48,873,223 and $74,867,476 respectively.

The study could not identify an appropriately sized (defined as 20 acres plus one acre per 100 students) central site for a new high school. 

If a new school were to be built on the Lyman Hall campus, the current building could continue to be used during construction, as could the site’s regional Agricultural Science and Technology Education Center, one of 19 in the state.

Eight other area districts send students to the center, at a cost of $6,823 per student. The town also receives a yearly $1,463,752 state grant. Should the center be closed, it would void an agreement with the state to operate at least through 2030 and would result in the town having to reimburse the state for its partial costs.

The Lyman Hall site would have space for athletics, parking and parent and bus drop-off areas, the study found. The site also allows for building outside of wetlands and the ability to adhere to setbacks.

Ten-year enrollment projections for high school students range from between 1,315 students to 1,562 students between the 2022-23 and 2031-32 school years, with the higher enrollments occurring earlier in the decade and declining.

A consolidated high school would be 298,000 square feet. The board cites expanding career pathways open to all high school students, increased course offerings, including electives and expanded extra-curricular activities, as advantages to a consolidated school.

“We would be able to expand our freshman (sports) teams,” Superintendent Danielle Bellizzi said. They also would be able to add clubs, service programs, and expand theater programs and jazz band, she said.

Academic offerings also could expand, she said.

“With both high schools, there isn’t as much opportunity to offer all courses,” Bellizzi said. “In one high school, we would be able to offer additional courses.”

An additional three school buses would be needed, according to the study.

The study also included estimates to renovate the current police station to be used for central offices, adult education and its Transition Academy, which would cost about $6.3 million.

The study also looked at the possibility of moving those uses to Sheehan if that school were to close.

Should the consolidation proposal be approved, the new school would open in the fall of 2028.


Norwich Public Utilities proposes $107.8 million budget

Claire Bessette

Norwich ― Norwich Public Utilities presented a $107.8 million proposed 2023-24 budget Tuesday that is being impacted by the cost of energy and major capital projects, and supply chain problems.

NPU administrators presented the budget to the Board of Public Utilities Commissioners. The board will vote on the budget in April or May. The $107.8 million budget, with a $6.6 million, 6.5% increase over this year’s budget, covers all four of NPU’s services _ electric, natural gas, water and sewer.

Rate changes are not in the budget. NPU General Manager Chris LaRose said proposed rates for the next three years will be presented in July, with public hearings in the fall with new rates to take effect in November.

The proposed budget includes a sharp increase in electric division expenses, by far the largest division, small increases in water and sewer budgets and an anticipated decrease in the natural gas budget.

The $66.5 million electric budget includes an $8.5 million increase in the cost of purchased wholesale power, but LaRose said electricity costs are starting to come down from recent spikes.

NPU purchases wholesale electricity through the Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative. NPU receives a share of CMEEC revenues to use for rate stabilization. NPU will use $977,000 in rate stabilization money to cut purchased power costs, $832,000 less than it used last year from the fund.

Wholesale natural gas prices are budgeted to drop by $1.8 million. The total gas budget of $20.7 million is down by $2.5 million from this year. The water division budget of $11.2 million has a $180,546 increase over this year, and the sewer budget is up by $189,131 over this year to a total of $9.28 million.

In a sign that the utility has recovered from the COVID-19 pandemic, NPU will turn over $9.1 million in revenue sharing to the city, an increase of $536,105 from this year. By charter, NPU must return at least 10% of gross revenue from electric, water and natural gas divisions to the city. For the past two years, the contribution had dropped to about $8.5 million from the $9 million in 2019-20.

NPU also helps fund city economic development efforts with an annual allocation to the Norwich Community Development Corp. and funding to specific projects. For years, NPU provided $150,000 per year to NCDC, but raised it to $225,000 this year.

NPU created a new formula to calculate a portion of revenues to economic development. NCDC will receive $246,067 next year, representing 37.5% of the total $656,179 economic development budget.

NCDC President Kevin Brown welcomed the increased funding. Brown said NCDC requested additional city and NPU funding to write grant applications and to market the city.

In her budget presentation, Laura Huren, NPU financial planning manager, highlighted significant capital projects, topped by $31 million to start construction on the $160 million overhaul of the sewage treatment plant. Construction bids are due in April. NPU continues to pursue state and federal grants to reduce costs to local ratepayers.

NPU officials provided several examples of how inflation and supply chain issues continue to plague daily operations and major projects. A single transformer that cost about $2,500 a few years ago and arrived within 10 to 12 weeks now costs $10,000 and takes 72 weeks to be delivered.

Equipment mounts for utility poles now take a year to receive and have risen in price by 200% to 300%. Chemicals for treating drinking water and sewage have skyrocketed, including a 125% jump in chlorine prices, officials said.




March 28, 2023

CT Construction Digest Tuesday March 28, 2023

A Passion for Building Drives O&G’s Third Generation Chief

Scott Van Voorhis

The idea of working for a single company for an entire career may seem like a relic from a distant age, but it has worked well for Raymond R. Oneglia in helping guide his family-owned contracting business into the 21st century—and into its own next 100 years—while preserving bedrock values of dedication, loyalty, respect and consensus-building.

Under Oneglia as vice chairman, Torrington, Conn.-based O&G Industries Inc. has thrived and expanded beyond its home state to take part in major projects around the country. But the company has not lost focus on its core New England market, with Oneglia striking a balance between growth and keeping the company, one of the largest privately owned contractors in the Northeast, at a manageable size.

The firm ranks at No. 287 on ENR’s current list of Top 400 contractors, reporting $332.6 million in 2021 revenue. The executive also has been prominent in sharing his decades of expertise with peers and with the next generation of industry professionals.

The successes have made Ray Oneglia this year’s selected recipient of ENR New England’s 2023 Legacy Award. It is given annually to an individual in the region, which includes Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont, who has established a solid record of lifetime industry achievement and service to colleagues and community.

“Ray is a very focused, dedicated person,” says Kenneth Merz, O&G corporate secretary, who has worked alongside Oneglia since 1970. “He is always thinking about what to do next or what we should get involved with.”

Family Affair

To say O&G is a family business doesn’t do full justice to Oneglia’s corporate commitment to the firm—and that of his brother David and several cousins.

The company was founded in 1923 by Oneglia’s grandfather, Andrew, and business partner Flaviano Gervasini. Oneglia’s father, Raymond, quit high school as a sophomore to help run the company, and he and brothers Francis and George were devoted to O&G before passing leadership to the third generation, Oneglia notes.

Driving with his father as a boy to construction sites, Oneglia got an early sense of industry life. He worked for the firm as a teen during summers, and by 16 was capable enough to be a foreman and scraper operator on the Colebrook Dam project in Connecticut. He also admits to a short-lived adventure with the dynamite crew on one project that ended when a state inspector sent him home for being under age.

Oneglia graduated in 1970 from Union College in Schenectady, N.Y., but there was little question of what career he planned. Soon he was overseeing a 16-mile sewer and roadway job, managing the reconstruction of Connecticut Route 7 from Danbury to Brookfield and running the repaving of I-84 from Danbury to Newton.

“It was just a passion—it was a total passion, and it is to this day,” Oneglia says. “I still get up at 5 and I’m in the office at 7.”

As he rose through the ranks, Oneglia began to push the company into new market niches, expanding a small rock quarry his grandfather had bought and acquiring other quarries and construction material yards.

Diversification has been good for the company’s bottom line, making O&G one of Connecticut’s top construction materials suppliers, with a recent investment in a factory to produce components for low-embodied carbon concrete.

The efforts also have harnessed the skills and drive of other family members to manage new units “so everyone has the kind of place where they could follow in a line of work behind their fathers,” Oneglia says. “I have a cousin whose father ran the building division and now he has run it for many years.” He notes another cousin who followed in his father’s footsteps into the firm’s asphalt operation.

The family approach, however, extends well beyond biological ties between various members of the Oneglia family. Across the firm at all levels, there are longtime employees who may be the second or even third generation of a family to work at O&G.

“We have had an incredible workforce —all union—and they have made the company what it is,” Oneglia says. “Everybody who has been with us for a long time, when they leave, it’s because of age or illness. We don’t lose [employees] very often. We have a company of very loyal people who have contributed immensely over the years to the success of the company.”

Safety Lesson

The strength of that bond was tested more than a decade ago after a Connecticut power plant site explosion in 2010 that killed six employees of O&G subcontractors as workers were clearing debris from plant pipes with hundreds of thousands of gallons of natural gas.

Oneglia declines to comment on the 2010 Kleen Energy plant accident, citing still active litigation with victims and families, but he acknowledges that the company learned hard lessons about safety over the years.

The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration levied $16.6 million in fines against the plant operator, subcontractors and O&G, which had the largest single penalty, $10.6 million. “We had a couple things happen over the years that were tragic,” Oneglia says, speaking in general of safety and efforts to reduce onsite accidents. “Could they have been prevented? You never know—you try and analyze” what happened, he adds. “We are very, very safety conscious.”

The lessons learned are key as O&G has pushed into new geographies and more complex project work. Oneglia led development of successful partnerships with contractors Perini Corp. and Tutor-Saliba, now Tutor-Perini Corp., forging a relationship with CEO Ron Tutor.

That paved the way for O&G to participate in complex projects such as a lock and dam in Louisiana, a nine-mile Chicago tunnel, a rail line through the Alameda Corridor in California and runway construction at Los Angeles International Airport. Oneglia is a board director of publicly traded Tutor-Perini.

“He definitely grew and developed over the years,” Merz recalls. “He was very good at meeting people and getting to know them and figuring things out about them as well.”

Oneglia says O&G has helped Tutor-Perini sharpen its pencils when drafting bids and provides a key financial backstop, which ensures that the California firm does not have to use all of its bonding capacity on a few projects. “None of the projects we have ever done with Tutor were finished late or had claims,” Oneglia says.

Community Impact

Oneglia has also assumed industry leadership roles over the years. His contributions include many years of service to the Connecticut Construction Industry Association—for which he headed several labor negotiation committees and its legislative committee and served as overall group chair. He also is past president of the Connecticut Road Builders Association.

A longtime member of The Moles, the national heavy construction professionals group, he was president in 1999 and received its member award in 2015. Former group executive director Tom Groark recalls Oneglia as a meticulous planner, “one of those contractors who thinks before he does anything and makes sure he has it all figured out before he starts anything.”

Oneglia, who says his father was also very active in the industry, takes pride in labor contracts he and other construction executives helped negotiate with trades on behalf of the Connecticut Construction Industry Association. “It was sometimes very time-consuming,” he says. “You could be there until 11 o’clock the night before.”

The executive has also been active in industry and union efforts to train young workers for construction careers, focusing on ways to remove potential job barriers for students in local high schools who are learning English. Oneglia has volunteered his time and money to support programs in local technical high schools. He also is dedicated to supporting veterans, having served in the Army National Guard and now serving as a board director of the U.S. Coast Guard Foundation. “It has been a very positive thing in my life to see what people do in the military, ” he says.

Looking ahead, Oneglia is planning the transition of O&G leadership, with seven fourth-generation family members involved in the company, including son R. Bradford “Brad” Oneglia, vice president in charge of asphalt, and nephew Ryan Oneglia, a heavy civil division vice president. Other extended family members hold vice president titles in the firm’s building, masonry and construction materials units.

“I think the most important thing is the full turnover of the organization to the next generation,” he said. “We are midway through that, if not a little further.”


Director of CT's controversial school construction grant program resigns

Dave Altimari

The person hired to replace Konstantinos Diamantis to steer the state’s school construction grant program has resigned after barely four months on the job.

Douglas Rogers resigned from his job as director of the Office of School Construction Grants & Review on March 13 in an email to the state Department of Administrative Services human resources department. The email didn’t give a reason for his sudden departure.

“As of March 13, 2023, I resign my position as Director, School Construction Grants and Plan Review, DAS,” Rogers wrote.In an interview this week, Rogers said he couldn’t adjust to the slow pace of state government work.

“I’ve been doing school construction for years, and I felt I was the right person for the job, but I just couldn’t get used to the state’s pace,” Rogers said. “I’m conditioned to move quickly, because time is money in construction, and I just couldn’t execute things in a timely manner.”

Rogers cited the example of trying to fill at least two vacancies on the OSCGR team. Rogers said he conducted several interviews and selected possible candidates but they found other jobs before the state’s hiring process was finished.

“If I had spent 10 years (in state employment) before taking this position, I would have been prepared for how slow things move,” Rogers said. “‘I just didn’t feel the work was being supported, so we mutually agreed I’d leave.”

Rogers began his job at OSCGR on Oct. 31 and was earning about $150,000 a year, according to state records.

He was hired after an extensive search to replace Diamantis, who was removed as the director in October 2021 after state officials were informed that a federal grand jury was investigating several school constructions projects.

DAS spokesman John McKay said the agency “is currently evaluating the next steps to fill this role.”

“The Office of School Construction Grants and Review continues to function as intended, and the office is being overseen by DAS Deputy Commissioner Darren Hobbs,” McKay said.

While state officials had little to say about Rogers’ resignation, DAS Commissioner Michelle Gilman told legislators during her confirmation hearing in January that she was “really proud” to be working with him.

She told lawmakers Rogers’ background made him a perfect person to lead the unit in the aftermath of Diamantis’ departure.

“He has a background of working at CREC [Capitol Region Education Council] and also with other school districts on school construction facilities management as well as a military background, which we have enjoyed because there is not a lot of diversion from procedures and process in the military,” Gilman said.

“He has been able to not only bring that vision to the school construction team but also a great deal of knowledge overseeing the OSCGR team in particular,” she added.

Diamantis, once the state’s second-highest budget official and a former state representative, was hired in 2015 to lead the school construction grants office. He took the grants oversight responsibility with him when he was appointed deputy secretary of the Office of Policy and Management in 2019.

OSCGR, which controls millions of dollars in state funding, has been in a state of flux since Oct. 28, 2021, the day Gov. Ned Lamont removed Diamantis from his appointed position as undersecretary of OPM and suspended him with pay from his position as the director of OSCGR. Diamantis resigned hours later that same day.

The move to oust Diamantis came shortly after reports surfaced that his daughter had been hired by then-Chief State’s Attorney Richard Colangelo’s office at the same time Colangelo was seeking Diamantis’ help in getting raises for state’s attorneys.

State officials also at that time released grand jury subpoenas revealing the federal investigation into the school grant program that included construction projects in Enfield, Manchester and Tolland.

After Diamantis was removed from OSCGR, Deputy DAS Commissioner Noel Petra was put in charge of the unit and tasked with helping to review previous school projects as well as approving grants for new ones.

DAS hired an outside auditor to review all of the grants OSCGR had issued since 2018, which is the same time frame federal authorities began investigating the program and for which issued the grand jury subpoena.

The 23-page report that was produced by Marcum LLP, an independent auditing firm, included an analysis of more than 111 school construction projects undertaken in Connecticut between 2018 and 2021.

The state paid Marcum $240,000 for the audit, which was immediately criticized by some legislators because no local officials were interviewed, and it only conducted a review of internal files and did not interview anyone outside of DAS.

Local officials from several towns alleged in the wake of the federal investigation that Diamantis pressured them to hire specific contractors for their school projects.

Those allegations included contracts for construction administrators, general contractors and demolition and remediation companies. 


Owner of former Bridgeport Stop & Shop making 'some changes' to self storage plan

Brian Lockhart

BRIDGEPORT — The developer who wants to build a self-storage facility at the site of a long-shuttered Stop & Shop on Madison Ave. said he requested this week's zoning hearing be delayed another month to incorporate "some changes" into his plan.

But those who have been urging Hugh Scott to completely scrap his proposal and replace it with affordable/senior housing may not want to get their hopes up just yet. He clarified Monday that the intent is for self-storage to remain in any revised design.

Scott said "we continue to evaluate" some sort of housing concept, but "we believe that self-storage is an important component of the development of the property."

"We're in the process of making some changes ... that we hope everyone will find more acceptable," Scott said when asked why his scheduled presentation to the zoning commission Monday night was put off until late April. He declined to elaborate further.

This is the second delay. His proposal was originally supposed to be brought to the zoning board in February.

Scott is just the latest property-owner to face a backlash in the North End, where some residents, elected officials and activists have in the recent past rallied to successfully oppose large-scale developments, from privately-run dormitories aimed at college students attending nearby Sacred Heart University, to a new two-year campus run by Fairfield University and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Bridgeport.

At least some of that resistance to big changes can be traced back a couple decades to the neighborhood's initial experience with the old Stop & Shop. An odd fit, the large supermarket, despite intense opposition, was built in the late 1990s at 2600 Madison Ave. on the former Dewhirst Dairy site in a mostly-residential neighborhood. It closed in 2012 and the building has since sat empty.

Scott bought the property a year-and-a-half ago for $4 million. At a public meeting last month at the North End Library organized by council members Michelle Lyons and AmyMarie Vizzo-Paniccia, he sought to convince the audience of around 50 people that he had studied various possibilities and a self-storage facility was the most realistic, and least intrusive and disruptive, use of the old store.

But an alternative plan urged by Lyons, former state Rep. Christopher Caruso, state Sen. Marilyn Moore and others to instead build some sort of affordably-priced and/or senior housing there appeared more popular with the crowd. The next week Mayor Joe Ganim announced that he too embraced that concept. 

Scott has countered housing would require "massive" public subsidies to be feasible. 

Told Monday of Scott's desire to still pursue some-sort of self-storage but with a possible residential piece, neither Lyons nor Caruso expressed enthusiasm for any such a mix.

"I just feel they're adding the housing to try to get the self-storage as well there," Lyons said. "How could you put storage and housing together?"

Caruso agreed, stating he did not think there was enough land for both. He also questioned whether anyone would want to live right next to a self-storage structure.

"The people, what I'm hearing, they want senior housing and a senior center," Lyons said. 

Ganim meanwhile on Monday said he would hope Scott would address the North End's issues with his original plan.

"If he doesn't, he's going to continue to get vocal opposition from the neighborhood and that has an impact. I think they raised legitimate, valid concerns," Ganim said.

This can also be a political issue for the mayor and his administration. North End voters will potentially play an important role in this year's upcoming elections, and he is running for another four-year-term.

The mayor and council appoint members of the zoning commission. That body, however, cannot simply turn down an application without providing legally defensible reasons should a developer appeal in court. 

Last April, following weeks of public back-and-forth between Fairfield University, the Bridgeport Diocese and their critics on the two-year college plan for diocese property elsewhere in the North End, the mayor's office issued an opinion from the law department that reversed a municipal lawyer's earlier conclusion that such a use of the land was allowed under zoning.

No one has so far questioned the actual legality of a self-storage facility where Scott wants to locate it.


Short by One Vote, Halls Road Overlay District Defeated in Old Lyme

Cate Hewitt

OLD LYME — After many months of presentations, public hearings and deliberations, the Zoning Commission narrowly denied the Halls Road Overlay District application that would have allowed the construction of mixed use buildings in the town’s main commercial district.  

At Monday’s special meeting, the application received three votes of approval and two against, which normally would have counted as an approval. But due to a negative referral from the Planning Commission in January, the application required a supermajority vote, or four out of the commission’s five votes. 

The overlay district would have allowed property owners and developers to build new mixed use buildings – with commercial space below and residential units above –  provided that the buildings fronted Halls Road according to certain rules. The biggest limiting factor to building high density residential units was the sewer or septic capacity, according to the attorney for the Halls Road Improvements Committee. The issue dates back to 2015, when the committee first convened. 

During Monday’s nearly two-hour discussion preceding the vote, commission secretary Jane Marsh – who voted to approve – requested a number of language changes to the December 16, 2022 draft, including changes recommended by town attorney Matt Willis. 

Among Marsh’s requests were that the commission specify a maximum length for buildings fronting Halls Road to avoid the possibility of long, continuous structures that lacked gaps where pedestrians could walk through to the parking lots located behind the buildings.  

The idea, Marsh said, was to approximate Lyme Street, “so we’re looking for that same feeling, just having some small break up in the buildings.” 

The commission approved a maximum length of 125 feet per building, as well as a building maximum of 10,000 square feet. 

The maximum building height was lowered from 40 feet to 35 feet, and the maximum lot coverage was lowered from 50 percent to 40 percent because the area is in the town’s conservation zone – and its regulations would supersede the overlay district’s, said Marsh. 

Commission chair Paul Orzel urged the commission to present the best legal document possible to allow a developer to present a proposal to the commission.

“What are the legal guardrails that this overlay should have?” he asked. 

Orzel, who voted to approve the application, said that infrastructure constraints would drive the amount of development on Halls Road. 

The overlay presented opportunities for developers, said commission member Mary Jo Nosal, who voted to approve the proposal.

“I think we’re trying to redevelop what we’ve had since 1950s and 1960s. We’re trying to do what towns are doing throughout the state in developing usable, livable streetscapes so that people can age in place,” she said. “It’s a mindset that’s different from what we had before to what we’d like our vision to be in the town of Old Lyme.” 

Nosal said the town had held meetings over the past three years to ask people what they wanted to see in their shopping district. 

She also noted that the Halls Road Improvements Committee had not been represented at the Planning Commission meeting when the negative referral vote took place. 

Alternate Michael Barnes, who replaced commission member Mike Miller at the meeting, said he was concerned about potential bulk frontage on Halls Road and as well as lot coverage and density, which he said would increase. 

Barnes, who voted against the application, also said the potential housing on Halls Road would be rented at market rate and would not accomplish the goal of creating affordable housing in the community. 

Sloan Danenhower, who replaced commission member Tammy Tinnerello because she had not attended the previous meetings concerning Halls Road, said the “elephant in the room” was the lack of infrastructure for sewer and water.

“The town pays for it down the road,” he said. 


Proposed warehouse in Ashford has many in the ‘Quiet Corner’ up in arms

Eric Bedner

Residents of Ashford are in an uproar at a proposal — similar to one that was shot down in Willington — that could place an enormous warehouse in their rural town, raising concerns that it would destroy the character of the “Quiet Corner.”

Massachusetts-based Campanelli Construction is proposing a 1.1 million-square-foot, 55-foot-tall warehouse on the site at the intersection of Interstate 84 and Route 89 in the northern section of town, a parcel that includes the Ashford Motel.

The structure would be about the same size as the Buckland Hills Mall in Manchester.

Any construction is a long way off, as the Planning and Zoning Commission is considering amending its regulations to allow for a building on the site to be as tall as 55 feet.

The current regulation on the Interstate Interchange Development zone, or IID, the only one in town, limits the height of buildings to 35 feet.

The developers initially wanted to extend the height limit to 75 feet, but scaled it back to 55 feet after hearing from the public.

If the rule change were to be approved, the regulations would apply to any future structures on the parcel.

Developers of the proposed warehouse would have to return to get the commission’s approval for a special permit to begin construction, a lengthy process that would also include more public hearings.

An ‘outrageous’ proposal

Hundreds of residents already have attended two public hearings in February and March, with a large majority of speakers opposing the project. A third public hearing is scheduled for April.

“The majority of those who have spoken seem to be negative toward it, but there are also a number of people who are in favor of it,” First Selectman Bill Falletti said.

Speaking as a resident and taxpayer, not as first selectman, Falletti said that he supports the rule change to allow the process to go on to the next step.

He notes that if the proposal were to move forward to the special permit process, it would face more scrutiny, such as environmental and traffic studies, both of which are sticking points for many residents.

Despite the polarizing issue leading to residents calling for a townwide vote, the Planning and Zoning Commission has the final say under state law, Zoning Enforcement Officer Michael D’Amato said.

While Campanelli Construction is seeking a similar warehouse that was proposed in Willington, it is not the same developer and the projects are not connected.

D’Amato, who also serves as a zoning agent in Willington, said the project was scrapped in that town because the developers were seeking to change the proposed area from residential zoning to allow for what would have been a 1.5 million-square-foot warehouse.

No tenant has been lined up for the Ashford proposal, leaving residents to further speculate about the impact to their rural community.

Ashford resident Michael Maglaras, who also serves as the superintendent of the captive insurance company fixing crumbling foundations, said his main concern is that the site off Exit 72 of I-84 is the last undeveloped exit off the highway in the area.

He opines that millions of cubic yards of land would have to be moved from a “pristine” site next to a state wildlife sanctuary.

“This is a massive, massive construction project” with no planned public water or sewer, Maglaras said. “Simply put, it’s the wrong project for a rural environment.”

He said he and his wife moved to Ashford from Greenwich after 30 years specifically because it is rural and quiet.

“We’re going to fight like hell to keep it that way,” Maglaras said, adding that he’s hopeful the proposal doesn’t get past the initial rule change, saying that if the amended language were passed, it would be “opening Pandora’s box.”

Charles Vidich, an Ashford resident with four decades of experience in land-use planning on the local, state, and federal level, also opposes the project.

Specifically, he is concerned that whatever tenant to occupy the building would have to “self-police” their water and septic systems.

“It is a public water supply issue,” Vidich said. “It’s not a question of if a disaster will happen, it’s a question of when.”

He also doubts assertions that trucks going in and out of the warehouse property would only use I-84, saying that many are more likely to take the local Route 89 when traveling south.

“This is really an outrageous urban proposal for a rural area,” Vidich said.

Town impact

John Knuff, an attorney representing Campanelli Construction, said that no public water would be affected as all wastewater would be collected and treated on site, and that 30% of the land would remain open space, according to Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes.

Maglaras said he understands some residents support the idea because of the tax revenue.

Knuff said that the expected impact on the town’s tax rate would result in an average savings of about $850 per year on property taxes, depending on the assessed value of a resident’s home.

He said that the location represents only about 0.5% of the town’s land, but could possibly support up to 10% of Ashford’s budget, according to meeting minutes.

Residents of Willington and Stafford shot down a similar proposal last year, as a warehouse was proposed off Exit 70 of I-84.

At that time, developers said they expected at least 900 tractor-trailers a day coming on and off the interstate using local roads.

They also estimated that at least 1,500 cars would be commuting daily to the building as well.


Developer to tweak affordable housing plans after Rocky Hill, Glastonbury projects rejected

Hanna Snyder Gambini

ANew York-based developer of several proposed “attainable” apartment buildings around Connecticut said he will resubmit new plans for projects in Rocky Hill and Glastonbury after both applications were denied by those towns’ Planning and Zoning boards.

Vessel RE Holdings LLC is looking to build a five-story apartment complex on vacant property at 2369 Main St. in Rocky Hill, with 30 one-bedroom units, nine of which would be rent-restricted for low- and moderate-income households.

The Rocky Hill Planning and Zoning Commission last month denied Vessel’s application, citing concerns with traffic flow, lack of amenities like sidewalks or greenspace, inadequate parking and electrical grid capabilities.

Glastonbury Plan and Zoning officials last week rejected a plan by Vessel RE Holdings LLC to build 48 apartments on a vacant lot at 51 Kreiger Lane.

That plan called for 30% of units to be affordable for 40 years, which was a condition for receiving certain zoning exemptions through the state’s affordable housing law. 

Glastonbury’s town attorney told land use officials that the parcel is in a “Planned Commerce” zone, and therefore wouldn’t qualify for those exemptions because it’s an industrial area.

Neil Rubler, founder and CEO of Vessel, said his firm plans to submit new applications for  both projects, but has not yet determined a timeline or which changes they will make to each set of plans.

Vessel RE Holdings LLC is an affiliate of New York City-based Vessel Technologies, which also has an apartment project underway in New London and is planning a similar development in  Simsbury.

Vessel’s approach is to build small, energy-efficient apartments that are accessible to middle-income professionals like first responders, teachers and other residents who don’t qualify for subsidized housing but for whom luxury or even market-rate rents are out of reach.


$327M Connecticut Children’s Hartford expansion stirs debate with included $47M parking garage

KENNETH R. GOSSELIN

HARTFORD — An expansion of Connecticut Children’s in Hartford that would roughly double the size of the hospital could come with an equally imposing $47 million parking garage on the opposite side of Washington Street, rising as high as 8 stories with 900 parking spaces.

The proposed parking garage, at the southwest corner of Washington and Lincoln streets, would accompany a new, $280 million tower now under construction across the street on Connecticut Children’s campus.

The garage, which would be connected to the hospital via a pedestrian skywalk, is critical to the expansion, the hospital says, and will provide parking for hundreds of new employees Connecticut Children’s expects to hire and convenient access for an increased number of patients.

Currently, the hospital leases parking in multiple places. The new garage would give patients, visitors and employees a dedicated parking option, Connecticut Children’s said.

But the garage also is stirring debate in the city’s surrounding Frog Hollow neighborhood, not only for its size but for a design that doesn’t do enough to add life to the streetscape and better blend into the neighborhood.

The project illustrates the tension that exists between hospitals in urban areas that want to expand and innovate, and the older, sometimes historic communities that surround them. In Hartford, the proposal also comes as parking throughout Hartford — particularly downtown — is increasingly being debated and whether its existence is holding back more mass transit alternatives.

Neighborhood leaders in Frog Hollow are quick to acknowledge the contributions to medicine made by Connecticut Children’s. They strongly supported the 195,000-square foot tower, which will get a ceremonial groundbreaking April 28.

But some of those leaders are equally fast to point out that existing parking garages in the hospital district along Washington Street that encompasses Connecticut Children’s and Hartford Hospital already present a physical barrier of sorts to the surrounding neighborhood.

“To further that, i.e. just build a pure parking garage that will further wall off their community from ours does nothing, in my mind, to benefit the neighborhood nor does it help them become a more integral part of our neighborhood and community,”  Aaron Gill, a longtime Frog Hollow resident and activist, said.

Connecticut Children’s said it has worked with the Frog Hollow Neighborhood Revitalization Zone since last fall to improve its design, adding more storefront space and cloaking the garage with a mesh that would mask the parking decks that could be covered with murals designed by local artists.

The hospital said it also has made concessions on reducing the height of the structure on Lincoln Street to better blend with its residential nature. Residents of that street also would be able to park for free during snowplowing and trash collection.

“The reality is: we, one, can only afford so much,” Bob Duncan, Connecticut Children’s chief operating officer, said, noting that the most recent designs have evolved from discussions with the NRZ. “We’re in the hospital business. We take care of kids. That’s what we do.”

The cost of the parking garage already has grown from an initial $28 million, pushed higher not only by design changes but also the higher cost of materials and persistent supply-chain troubles, Duncan said.

More can be done

Frog Hollow’s Gill and others in the neighborhood argue more can be done with the facade of the structure, perhaps adding office space on a third upper floor that could also be used by the hospital.

In addition, measures could be taken to reduce overall parking, such as eliminating free parking for employees to encourage other transportation alternatives. An overall reduction in parking demand could help chip away at poor air quality and higher childhood asthma rates, they say.

Duncan said imposing parking fees on employees would put Connecticut Children’s at a recruitment disadvantage. The hospital’s two main competitors in Hartford — Hartford Hospital and St. Francis Hospital — don’t charge employees, Duncan said.

“I’m sure you’re well aware of the recruitment wars and the shortage of staffing that we have in health care at this given time,” Duncan said.

Duncan said air pollution is just one part of a complex mix affecting asthma rates that also includes cigarette smoking, animal dander, dust, mites and indoor pollution.

“The idea of a car driving, pulling in and parking versus driving around the neighborhood, looking for parking at street level,” Duncan said. “You’re using more energy and creating more pollution.”

The garage proposal is still in the early stages and would require approvals from the city’s historic preservation commission and its planning and zoning commission. If approved, construction of the garage would not begin until early next year, to be timed with the completion of the new tower, expected in late 2025.

In an unusual move, the NRZ recently voted neither to offer a letter of support nor to oppose the garage. Instead, the NRZ decided to draft a letter with the pluses and the minuses of the garage project, clearly signaling it wants more discussion with the hospital.

“There is opportunity for discussion, and maybe if we can move the needle a little further, we can actually get to where the NRZ may support the project,” Carey Shea, co-chair of the NRZ in Frog Hollow, said. “But I don’t think we’re there right yet. But I also don’t think we’re ready to cease discussions. We’re still open to bringing good ideas forward.”

‘Not just put up, but kept up’

The parking garage proposal — and Connecticut Children’s new tower — also are part of a larger plan by the city that envisions the Washington Street corridor as a health and innovation corridor, anchored by Connecticut Children’s and Hartford Hospital. The corridor was listed in the plan as one of the 10 projects that could transform the city by 2035, Hartford’s 400th anniversary.

At the center of Connecticut Children’s expansion is a move into fetal care from its traditional pediatric care roots. Fetal care often includes surgery inside the womb to improve chances of survival. The hospital also seeks to build on specialized treatments for rare bone diseases. Both aim at raising the hospital’s profile nationally.

For Frog Hollow, the expansion and parking garage project also has a third component: a mixed-use development on the site of a former car wash on the northeast corner of Washington and Lincoln. The hospital purchased the property last year and is now using it as a staging area for construction. Connecticut Children’s has committed to securing a developer for the property, after the new tower and garage are completed.

But to build the parking garage, there is a cost to neighborhood.

The structure would encroach on a historic district, requiring the acquisition and demolition of four houses on Lincoln Street. Lincoln Street is part of a historic district created in 2003 of mostly two, two-family structures built between 1890 and 1915.

The project also would include buying and razing the J Restaurant and Bar building at 297 Washington St., a fixture for more than 50 years. J Restaurant and its predecessor, Pizza Plus, have been operated by two generations of the Dikegoros family.

Jordan Dikegoros, the restaurant’s owner, declined to comment on the project. But hospital officials told a recent meeting of the Frog Hollow NRZ that Dikegoros is considering moving into some of the storefront space in the proposed garage.

The garage would be built, owned and operated by LAZ Parking Realty Investors, an arm of the Hartford-based parking giant. The hospital will lease it and through those payments will eventually pay for the construction, Duncan said.

At a recent NRZ meeting, even those who support the parking garage still have concerns.

Andrea Richardson, a property owner on nearby Madison Street and an employee at Connecticut Children’s, observed that the existing garages aren’t that attractive, and she wondered, as time passes, what would happen to the proposed garage.

“We’re talking about this happening now,” Richardson said. “But then, 5, 10 years from now, what is that structure going to look like? It just needs to be, not just put up, but kept up.”


Pool, bathhouse to go as Hamilton Park project begins

LIVI STANFORD

WATERBURY – Hamilton Park’s pool, bathhouse, “Bubble” building, and athletic center are scheduled to be demolished next month, signifying the beginning of phase 1 of a massive renovation project at the 92-acre park that has been three years in the making.

“It is an exciting first step as this has been a priority of the mayor’s administration to look at our parks and enhance them where we can,” said Thomas Hyde, interim director of the Waterbury Development Corporation.

At the Board of Aldermen meeting on April 10, the board is scheduled to decide whether to approve a multimillion-dollar contract to construct a new pool, a 3,200-square feet pool house, and a promenade adjacent to Seven Angels Theatre.

These projects are all part of Phase 1, which Mayor Neil O’Leary said is expected to cost $8 million, which will be funded with American Rescue Plan Act funds.

He described the project as a “quality of life issue” that is long overdue.

O’Leary said the swimming pool would be “state of the art” and the pool house would have amenities and be compiant with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

On March 20, the Board of Aldermen unanimously approved allocating $700,000 from American Rescue Plan funds toward phase 1 improvements.

In that same meeting, the board also approved two contracts for tree removal on the site and the construction and demolition of the buildings.

“We are looking to do a lot of work in Hamilton Park and this is the start of it,” said Board of Aldermen President Paul Pernerewski. “It is a good project and people have been waiting awhile to get the work done in Hamilton. This is the first step to clear the way to get into this project.”

O’Leary said work on the master plan for Hamilton Park began three years ago, with neighborhood community meetings and the hiring of the Chesire-based design firm SLR Consulting, which helped with the design of the park.

The firm included 25 recommendations, of which SLR landscape architect Suzanne Schore has cited the conversion of Hamilton Park Road into a pedestrian walkway and multiuse trail with amenity space and lighting as one of the most significant. All 25 recommendations are part of the master plan.

The 12-foot walkway would close traffic between a new parking lot where the tennis courts are and Seven Angels Theatre. According to the park’s master plan, vehicle access to the road would be restricted to emergency vehicles.

Officials are recommending the road closure because Hamilton Park Road over the years has been used as a shortcut from East Main Street to Plank Road, where there have been car accidents involving pedestrians.

The pedestrian and safety improvements are not part of Phase 1 but city officials say the goal is to do every single item on the master plan contingent on funding and grants.

Michael LeBlanc, the city’s director of finance, said the city was pursuing several funding opportunities.

Bilal Tajildeen, president of the Bouley Manor Neighborhood Association, said he was excited to hear about a potential new pool. He said his biggest concern is the lack of sidewalks and bike paths on Meriden Road and East Main Street leading to the park.

“If you wanted to ride your bike to the park, you couldn’t ride your bike,” he said. “That creates a lopsided park system.”

Hyde said certainly officials would look into this issue to potentially address in future phases.


Developer pursues tax break to build new hotel in Southington

Jesse Buchanan

SOUTHINGTON – Hotel owners are eyeing a property off Queen Street near Interstate 84 and are looking for a tax abatement to open in Southington.

KARM Properties is interested in a tax abatement for development at 95 John Weichsel Crossing, a small road off Queen Street near the Hartford HealthCare HealthCenter and just south of the I-84 ramps.

The property is in an enterprise zone, which allows the possibility of a tax abatement that’s partially funded by the state.

Mark Sciota, Southington’s town manager, said the council could vote to send the tax abatement question to the Southington Enterprise Zone and Economic Development Committee (SEED).

Even if the council and SEED were in favor of the idea, building a hotel would require Planning and Zoning Approval. Sciota said hotel owners want to know if they’ll get the tax abatement before taking on the expense of drawing up plans and filing town applications. He said it’s early in the process.

“There’s an applicant investigating putting in a hotel there,” Sciota said.

The seven-year tax abatement reduces the property tax burden by 100 percent the first year, declining gradually to zero by the end of the program.

Such tax abatements help encourage development, according to town officials. Earlier this month, a similar tax break was given to Anthony Properties, a Texas-based developer building a $100 million residential and retail project on West Street.

Boost to other businesses

Barbara Coleman-Hekeler, Southington Chamber of Commerce president, is also on the SEED committee. While she didn’t want to comment as a committee member without seeing the tax abatement request, she said as a chamber director the addition of a hotel is usually welcome by area businesses including other hotels.

Southington’s location and attractions draw people from the state and region, she said, so it’s not surprising that a hotel was looking to start up. That might even be welcome to other hotels that at times struggle to keep enough rooms available.

“I know that all of our hotels on West Street are super busy in Southington,” Coleman-Hekeler said. “They work very closely together so that if there’s an overflow for a specific time period, they feed into each other’s hotels.”

“As a chamber, if it’s a business that’s coming to town to not just conduct business here but to be supportive of everything that’s here as well, that’s the main focus of everything that we are as a chamber,” she said.

KARM Properties could not be reached for comment Monday.


Stores to open at Newington development by year's end; supermarket remains a mystery

Luther Turmelle

NEWINGTON — The retail component of a mixed-use complex under construction on a nearly 25-acre site formerly owned by Eversource Energy on the Berlin Turnpike is expected to open by the end of the year, according to a principal for one of the project's developers.

Meadow Commons will offer 99,500 square feet of retail space, with 45,000 square feet of that space carved out for a yet-unannounced grocery store anchoring the development, said Jeremy Grossman, a senior vice president with the Massachusetts-based Grossman Development Group. The retail portion will also include restaurants, with Sally's Apizza and Shake Shack taking some of the space, Grossman said.

The residential component will include 269 apartment units, with residents expected to begin moving in some time during the spring of 2024, he said.

"We have spent a couple of years getting to know this community," Grossman said of Newington. "We think we have a pretty good idea what people in this market are looking for in terms of shops and services."

Mixed-use development projects have become increasingly popular because of the symbiotic relationship between the residential and retail elements, said David Cadden, a professor emeritus at Quinnipiac University's School of Business. 

"For the retailers in these developments, you get a captive audience, a captive customer base with the people who live there," Cadden said. "And for the developer of the homes, one-stop shopping is a selling point for potential buyers."

The Meadow Commons site was formerly the home of a training facility for Eversource, according to Mitch Gross, a company spokesman. The property was sold for nearly $3 million in July 2022, and construction on the mixed-use complex started in November.

The name of the grocery store anchor has not been released at the request of that company, Grossman said. Several of Grossman Development's retail centers elsewhere are anchored by supermarkets.

The company acquired a retail center last year in Waterville, Maine, that has a Hannaford Supermarket as its anchor. Lakeway Commons, which the company developed in Shrewsbury, Mass., has a 50,000-square-foot Whole Foods Market as its anchor.

Grossman described Lakeway Commons as "a very similar site and a very similar plan," to Meadow Commons. Both developments have about the same amount of retail space and nearly the same number of housing units.

The supermarket that goes into Meadow Commons will have the difficult task of competing against Stew Leonard's, which is located less than a mile south of the new development on the Berlin Turnpike.

Based on the size of the largest retail space in Meadow Commons, retail consultant Burt Flickinger said the likely tenant for the new development is either a Whole Foods or a Lidl, a German discount grocery chain that does not currently have a location in New England.

Whole Foods officials "like to work with developers that they already have existing relationships with" when opening new stores., said Flickinger, managing director of the New York City-based Strategic Resource Group.

Whole Foods has 10 stores in Connecticut with an 11th store under construction at Evergreen Walk in South Windsor. The closest Whole Foods to Newington is 10 miles away in Glastonbury.

Lidl stores are typically 30,000 square feet to 35,000 square feet in size, he said. The grocery chain has about 170 stores in nine U.S. states along the East Coast from Georgia to New York.

Whole Foods and Trader Joe's are two grocery chains that are "trying to fill in the holes of where they don't have stores in the state," said Wayne Pesce, president of the Connecticut Food Association. 

With the exception of a Whole Foods store in Milford, all of the chain's other locations are clustered in either Fairfield County or Hartford's suburbs. Trader Joe's has nine stores in Connecticut that follow a similar pattern: Five are in Fairfield County and four are in Hartford's suburbs.