September 14, 2023

CT Construction Digest Thursday September 14, 2023

Infrastructure backlog jumps 24%, pushing demand to ‘upper end of historic levels’

Sebastian Obando

Construction’s biggest companies are booking more jobs as federal money accelerates infrastructure work, while firms under $100 million in annual revenues are having a harder time extending their backlog winning streak, according to Associated Builders and Contractors analysis.

A 24.4% upswing in infrastructure backlog in August kept the overall backlog level 5.7% higher than in August 2022, according to ABC. That elevated level persists despite tightening credit, high financing costs and lingering recession fears, said Anirban Basu, ABC chief economist.

“Backlog continues to be at the upper end of historic levels, with the infrastructure category registering substantial gains in backlog in August,” said Basu. “That suggests that a growing number of public works projects is poised to break ground.”

Backlog fell on a monthly basis for companies with revenues of less than $100 million a year. That mirrors the slight downturn in monthly numbers from July to August as overall industry backlog, including private development, dipped 1.1% lower.

But it surged more than 30% for the biggest contractors — those with sales of $100 million or more — that are most likely to bid on billion-dollar, large-scale infrastructure projects. That swing has contractors more upbeat about the construction outlook, despite the fact that demand for their services already hovers around historic highs.

Given that environment, even the slightest upward movement in backlog in the short-term “is remarkable” given the issues facing the wider economy, such as tight credit, financing costs and recession fears, said Basu. 

“There’s no sign of a construction recession in the near term,” he said. “If anything, contractors are more upbeat, as policy and technology shifts, along with economic transformation, are creating substantial demand for improvements and growth in America’s built environment.”


ABC’s Construction Confidence Index reading for sales, profit margins and staffing levels all moved higher in August, the first time all three categories improved over the month since February. The three readings all sit above the threshold of 50, indicating expectations of more growth over the next six months.

Only the West region posted a lower backlog from a year ago, while the South remains the region with the highest level of backlog, according to the analysis.

ABC’s backlog reading measures the work contractors have booked, but have not yet begun. The association releases the benchmark each month along with the Construction Confidence Index, which polls construction executives about their outlook on sales, profit margins and staffing over the next six months.


New London approves Fort Trumbull apartment, garage projects

John Penney

New London ― The Planning & Zoning Commission gave a New Haven development company the go-ahead on Wednesday to transform three parcels of Fort Trumbull land into two apartment complexes with a total of 500 units and a six-story parking garage.

The commission granted special permit and site plan approvals to RJ Development + Advisors, LLC, doing business as RJDA Fort Trumbull AA, LCC, to build two five-story apartment complexes — one on Nameaug Street and another at 28 Walbach St. — along with a 1,200-space parking garage at 26 East St.

Ahead of the vote, Attorney Bill Sweeney, representing RJDA, reminded committee members of the decades of inaction at the Fort Trumbull site.

“This is a day a lot of us have been waiting for,” he said, calling the proposed construction a way to transform the peninsula into a “place of new vibrancy”and “complete the redevelopment of the Fort Trumbull area.”

Several parcels on the peninsula have been vacant for almost 20 years, the result of a controversial demolition and development push by the New London Development Corp. that led to the landmark 2005 U.S. Supreme Court eminent domain decision, Kelo v. New London.

In January, the three city-owned properties totaling 6.28 acres now poised for development were sold to RJ Development for $500,001 through an agreement with the Renaissance City Development Association, or RCDA, the city’s development arm.

Both the Nameaug and Walbach street apartment projects call for a mix of studio and one- and two-bedroom units with on-site property parking. The proposed East Street garage will house up to 1,200 vehicles and is expected to be heavily used by employees at the nearby Electric Boat engineering offices.

The apartments will be market-rate units, Sweeney said, and will be promoted to a specific demographic of renter. The project does not include any affordable housing.

“There’s a sizable deficit of housing for people with disposable income,” Sweeney said.

Tentative plans calls for construction of the Nameaug Street building to begin in 2024 and last for two years. The Walbach portion of the work will not start until 2026 while the garage construction could start next year.

Jason Rudnick, RJDA principal, said he was “thrilled” by the commission’s votes.

“I look forward to continuing our work with the city of New London,” he said.

Commission member Ronna Stuller cast the sole “no” votes of the night, declining to support the Nameaug Street and garage projects.

Other Fort Trumbull project stalled

Wednesday’s votes came almost exactly 21 months after commission members approved plans for a 104-unit apartment complex and an extended-stay hotel on the northeast end of the peninsula near the Fort Trumbull Riverwalk.

The Massachusetts-based Optimus Construction Management, which specializes in senior living facilities, bought 4 acres of city-owned land in February 2022 for $750,000 for the hotel and apartment building projects, though no work has yet started at the site.

RCDA Executive Director Peter Davis said he met with Optimus principals on Tuesday for a project update. He said the supply-chain issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic have plagued the project much like others across the country.

“It all kind of fell apart on them, but they have not abandoned the project,” Davis said on Wednesday. “They were working on finishing up projects in Maine and Massachusetts and their intention is to move forward with (the Fort Trumbull) work.”

The Optimus deal represented the first time in two decades that a private firm became a Fort Trumbull district landowner. Other parcels in the neighborhood are home to the New London water treatment plant, Fort Trumbull State Park and an under-construction $40 million city community center.

Development on the peninsula had been hindered by restrictions the state’s Department of Energy and Environmental Protection placed on the number of residential units.

In 2000, the state and city established a municipal development plan with a flood management certificate approved by DEEP that limited the number of residential units to 84. The certificate was first modified in 2011 to allow 104 units and then again this year to allow a total of 604 housing units on the peninsula.


Hartford’s latest effort to dismiss fired ballpark developer’s lawsuit fails

Michael Puffer

Superior Court Judge Cesar Noble has shot down Hartford’s latest attempt to end Middletown developer Centerplan Co.’s long-running legal challenge to its 2016 firing from the development of Dunkin’ Park.

Noble, on Monday, ruled against a city argument that Centerplan had previously signed away its standing to bring a legal challenge to its bonding company on the ballpark project, Arch Insurance Co.

“Centerplan will now be allowed to prove the mayor’s termination of the stadium construction contract in June 2016, which precipitated this seven-year nightmare for the principals of Centerplan and DoNo, was wrongful,” said Attorney Louis Pepe, who is representing the affiliated companies. “The city’s day of reckoning is coming.”

A city motion to dismiss a portion of the legal challenge holding up blocks of apartment development around the ballfield is still up for a hearing in October.

After dropping DoNo Hartford LLC as the developer of the ballpark and surrounding development, the city moved forward with Stamford-based RMS Cos., which opened its first 270-unit apartment building last year. RMS’ plan to roll right into a second phase of construction on nearby properties was stymied after the Connecticut Supreme Court in May 2022 ordered a new trial on prior challenges brought by DoNo and Centerplan.

The city is advancing several arguments, including that a judge could not reasonably agree with DoNo’s request that it be granted the right to build on the properties around the ballpark, including the one already developed. The city is also arguing that a court should not be in the position of rewriting development agreements and that the city’s relationship with DoNo is too broken to reasonably pursue a development together.  

Pepe, on Tuesday, said he and his clients are “very pleased” about the court’s decision on the motion against Centerplan, but disappointed in the city’s lack of interest in negotiating a settlement.

Hartford Corporation Counsel Howard Rifkin said the city has been, and remains, open to settlement talks.

“With all due respect to Attorney Pepe, the city has never said it is disinterested or will not engage in settlement negotiations,” Rifkin said. “Were we to do that, we would clearly not do that in public settings.”