February 29, 2024

CT Construction Digest Thursday February 29, 2024

Middletown negotiating purchase of deKoven Drive parcel for housing, retail project

Cassandra Day

MIDDLETOWN —  Negotiations are moving ahead to purchase a property on deKoven Drive to make way for the proposed Village at Riverside downtown mixed-use development, which will include ample parking for residents and visitors.

Among the components are affordable luxury units, condos, and as retail and public spaces.

Parking will be a major component of the block-size development to be built between deKoven and Dingwall drives, Main and Court streets, behind police headquarters. Between 500 and 700 new spaces are intended to replace those lost when the municipal parking lot on Court Street was demolished in 2018.

The city is negotiating with the owners of the adjoining Attention To Detail automotive customization shop parcel to reach a purchase agreement, according to General Counsel Brig Smith.  “I am optimistic that we can reach a deal that meets their needs and ours,” he said. 

The area is considered prime real estate for its view of the Connecticut River and an essential component of the Return to the Riverbend master plan of redevelopment, which aims to reconnect Main Street to Harbor Park and the river. 

The master plan also includes a pedestrian bridge over Route 9.

Housing units will comprise some 19 town homes, 258 apartments consisting of studios and one- and two-bedroom units, and about 56 new on-street parking spaces, Daniel Klaynberg, CEO of Wonder Works Construction of New York, said in November.

Two levels of parking will be reserved for police department staff, who now park their cruisers and other vehicles behind 222 Main St. There will also be 38,000 square feet of retail space on the ground level.

Now that the initial project concept has been delivered to the public, city officials will soon be seeking community feedback, Smith said. “We continue to make progress on the technical elements of the development in the meantime.”

These premium properties are considered a crucial element of Return to the Riverbend, the city’s master plan for redevelopment that aims to reconnect Middletown to the Connecticut River at Harbor Park by means that include a walking bridge and plaza over Route 9. 

The project is a private-public partnership between the city, Spectra Construction & Development, lifelong resident and developer JR Carnegie-Hargreaves, and Klaynberg’s firm. 

More downtown developments

Durham developer Dominick DeMartino is working on several projects in historical buildings on Main Street. 

Tony Prifitera, the owner of Sicily Coal Fired Pizza at 412 Main St., will operate a wine bar at 420 Main St. that is expected to open by the end of March, DeMartino said Wednesday. 

The sign for Nitro Cream 'n Crumbz, a nitrogen-infused ice cream and cookies shop, was recently installed at 422 Main St. That project is expected to be complete by April 1, he added.

Ten apartments are being built above the store at 424 Main St. They will be available for rent beginning May 1.

At 428 Main St., restoration of the former Woolworth building is also underway. A restaurant will occupy the first floor, with an elevator leading to a rooftop bar and patio. DeMartino is reviewing potential restaurants for the site.

The Fresh Cutz barbershop located at the rear of the building will open at the end of March.   

Also, 584 Main St. will be developed into 12 studio apartments and space for a 34,000 square-foot restaurant and bar.

DeMartino is also involved in the Kaplan Drive apartments project. He will present a proposal to the Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency in early April to reduce the original 148 units to 102.

Springside on Newfield Street

The Springside Middletown apartments on Newfield Street, or Route 3, will include 486 apartments when both phases of construction are complete. Bob Dale is the developer.

Officials are actively looking to increase the number of living spaces in Middletown. 

“The city continuously is having early planning conversations with developers regarding other possible housing developments,” Middletown Economic and Community Development Director Christine Marques said Monday.


Proposed Trumbull veterans center gets traffic OK, bids should go out soon

Shaniece Holmes-Brown

TRUMBULL — Now that a traffic study has been approved by the town's police commission, plans for the long-awaited Veterans and First Responders Center will go out to bid — and construction could break ground by April, officials say.

“They are two separate bid packages but they’re going out at the same time,” said Ray Baldwin, chairman of the Veterans and First Responders Center Building Committee. “The reason that there’s going to be two packages is because contractors could bid on one based on their expertise, or there might be some that could do both.”

Members of the police commission unanimously approved the traffic study, completed Jan. 16, during a special meeting Feb. 20 at the police department.

"The roads in that area were designed to accommodate a little bit of additional traffic that would be there periodically," Police Chief Michael Lombardo said. "But it’s not going to be a day-in-and-day-out thing with 100 cars there or anything like that."

Plans call for a new 5,500-square-foot building at 1 Veterans Circle at Kaatz Pond, the site of the former, now condemned, veterans building.

It will hold a maximum of 175 people and serve more than 30,000 veterans regionally. Parking will include between 60 and 65 parking spaces, the traffic study stated.

"It’s the same location where the first one was for many years, but that building was no longer habitable," Lombardo said. "So, the town has embarked on trying to get a new one built."

The original building, used by members of both the Veterans of Foreign Wars and the American Legion, was condemned in 2017 due to a failed foundation.

Baldwin said the previous building was "less than half the size" of the new one, and that both the police and first responders will be able to use the new building for training. 

The new center was originally proposed in 2020 with an initial estimated cost of around $2.5 million, but now has an estimated cost of about $4 million, officials said.

According to Baldwin, the committee has received $2.7 million in funding so far including: $1.5 million in state bonding, $750,000 in federal grant funding, a $250,000 state grant secured by Democratic State Rep. Sarah Keitt and $200,000 from the town.

There is currently a $1.2 million state bond request that must be added to the bond agenda by Gov. Ned Lamont in order to be approved, and there is also a $1.2 million earmark by U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., that is waiting for Congress to approve a federal budget.

Lombardo said the building will not only be used for department training but will also be rented out for special events to the public.

The building's design includes a memorial vestibule, two seminar rooms, two flex classrooms, a gathering room with a grill area, a covered deck that overlooks the pond and an outdoor patio with a fire pit.

"The town and the building committee decided it would be a good location to combine resources with first responders," he said. "It would be a good center for training with both our department and other departments within Fairfield County and would be large enough to do events so we can get good groups of people in there and do that."


New Haven begins reconnecting Wooster Square, Downtown, the Hill with $6.7 million State Street redesign

Mark Zaretsky

NEW HAVEN — Work has begun on a $6.7 million State Street redesign project to transform a nine-block stretch of lower State Street and "knit back together" areas of the city that were chopped up by urban renewal, city and state officials said Tuesday.

 The project aims to unlock redevelopment potential of seven underused parking lots, with 650,000 square feet of mixed-use development, including 450 housing units. It will also create a dedicated corridor for walkers and bicyclists, among other features, officials said. 

"This has really been the culmination of a long process to reknit Wooster Square, the Downtown and the Hill," said Carlos Eyzaguirre, the city's deputy economic development administrator, speaking at a news conference to announce the start of construction, which began earlier this month.

In some regards, "it's putting it back the way it was" prior to the urban renewal era, Eyzaguirre said. 

Because of rain, he spoke beneath the overpass along State Street just south of Bradley Street, within site of traffic barriers recently installed in front of the Encore by Goodfellas restaurant at 702 State St.

Back then, it had "mixed-use (development) on both sides," Eyzaguirre said. 

Mayor Justin Elicker called it "a really exciting project that is inspiring in a lot of different ways." Among them is that it "came out of a project about how to re-energize the Wooster Square neighborhood," Elicker said at the news conference.

As part of the project, "this stretch will become much, much safer for bicyclists and pedestrians," Elicker said.

The project's first phase will include "bump-outs" to protect pedestrians along State Street, from Trumbull Street to Grove Street, with the second phase running from Grove Street to Water Street, Elicker said. Phase 1 is to take place now through the end of the summer. 

Phase 2 will include "activating" several underused parking lots for future development, said Elicker.

Of the project's $6.7 million cost, $5.35 million is being paid by a state grant, with the rest coming from the city, officials said.

"The eastern side of State Street ... is one of the major casualties of urban renewal," said state Senate President Pro Tempore Martin Looney, D-New Haven. He said he was glad to see it finally being improved.

Looney recalled how in the 1950s, that end of State Street was home to many businesses, including an A&P grocery story at Chapel and State streets and watering holes such as Cassidy's and McGuire's.

"I celebrate the fact that it's being renewed," Looney said.

"It's important that we have a new way of looking at transportation," said state Rep. Roland Lemar, D-New Haven, House chair of the General Assembly's Transportation Committee. "This isn't about moving cars. This is about making connections." 

State Street "is a road, but it's more than that. It's a building block of the community," Lemar said.

Matt Pugliese, deputy commissioner of the state Department of Economic and Community Development, said the Connecticut Communities Challenge Grant program, which is funding the state's share, "is all about transit-oriented development, housing, stitching communities back together."

Alders Eli Sabin, D-7, and Carmen Rodriquez, D-6, both talked about how important the project will be to the neighborhoods they represent.

"This project is about reflecting our values and our priorities as a community," said Sabin, whose ward includes much of the stretch of State Street being renewed.

Rodriguez, whose ward includes parts of the Hill, City Point and Downtown, said the project "is about connecting communities back ... and connecting the Hill to the rest of downtown is important," she said. 

State Street, one of New Haven’s major downtown corridors, connects the Downtown, East Rock, Hill and Wooster Square neighborhoods. The area includes the State Street train station, according to a press advisory.

The $6.7 million project will redesign the streetscape along the nine-block stretch between Trumbull and Water Streets. 


Old Lyme Quarry Owner Ordered to Cease Unpermitted Work Along Three Mile River

Cate Hewitt

OLD LYME — After a discussion of unpermitted work at a quarry that lacked proper erosion protection along Three Mile River, the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission ordered the property owner to cease all work and to appear at a show cause hearing on March 7.

Ron Swaney, who owns 308-1 Mile Creek Road, told the commission Tuesday night that he had been working to improve the the 43.5 acre property by building berms along the river, removing beavers that had built a dam in a culvert, adding boulders along the river’s edge, and rerouting the driveway – all without securing permits. 

“We had water issues – Three Mile River was coming across the road and going into the ponds. So I created a berm with a two to one slope,” he said. “We’re cleaning up the place, making it nice… Where I made a mistake is I didn’t come to you first, I apologize for that,” he told the commission.

Neighbors Peter and Millie Caron, who live across the river, presented pictures to the commission of activity at the quarry, comparing before and after pictures from a few years ago to the present. 

“There are no environmental protections,” said Peter Caron. “They rip out trees and then put down wood chips. This is not something new, it’s been before this commission many times since the 90s.” 

After neighbors sent Eric Knapp, the wetlands agent for the town, photos and videos showing earth-moving work within 100 feet of the river and wetlands, he issued a violation notice to Swaney on Jan. 29, directing him to attend Tuesday’s hearing. 

Knapp described the area in the map submitted by former property owner Peter Alter where it had been agreed activity could take place. But extensive earth-moving and clear-cutting had taken place outside of that designated area, especially filling in areas and creating an earthen berm along the river edge, Knapp said. 

Knapp said there were piles of fill on the property but he didn’t know how much had been excavated from the site and how much had been trucked in. On a site visit, Knapp said he observed a lack of erosion controls in and around the ponds on the property.

“In 2022 the ponds had turtles and other wildlife. Now they could not exist with the level of siltation there,” Knapp said.

Swaney also owns an adjacent 2.5-acre parcel abutting at 304 Mile Creek Road where Knapp said Swaney has been clear cutting within 100 feet of the river. 

Swaney said he wanted to move the driveway entrance onto the adjacent property, further away from Union Chapel on Shore Road.

“It was a good neighbor thing. I thought it would be a nice thing to do, out of respect for the church,” Swaney told the commission. 

But Rachael Gaudio, chair of the commission, told Swaney that they had made it clear to him in 2022 that he needed to apply for permits before proceeding with any work. 

“The issue I have is that we went through this whole song dance before and you said maybe your big mistake was not coming to us sooner. I think we made it very clear in 2022, that you needed to come to us and ask for permission not forgiveness, I’m really disappointed that this is where we are right now,” she said. 

Gaudio said that all of the work was within 100 feet of the wetlands, as well as outside of the area the commission had previously approved, and the level of work being done seemed to be increasing. She added that Swaney also did not secure the permit required to clear beaver dams. 

She said that in her tenure on the commission, starting in 2017 she’d never had to deal with another property owner who had to return to commission on multiple occasions.

“And now we’re looking at huge enforcement action and potential litigation. That’s where this road leads to,” she said. 

Swaney defended a number of his actions, and said that there had been no erosion on the property and that when he had been asked to put up silt fences, he had done so. 

Gaudio said there were a number of issues and that throughout Swaney failed to apply for necessary permits in the areas regulated by the commission. 

The commission moved unanimously to issue a cease and desist order. Before the March 7 hearing, Swaney will be required to retain a soil scientist to prepare a restoration plan to address the work done in the regulated area without permits, which will also identify the types and possible origins of the fill used on the site. 

Michael Aurelia, a new member of the commission, said he believed in working with individual owners before moving to cease and desist, and to give Swaney a month to submit an application for permits. 

But commission member Mike Miller said that Wetlands had tried to work with Swaney and “we are beyond the point of letting a new application come in as if this was a brand new discovery.” 

Knapp said that Swaney could submit an application but the next step was a “thorough evaluation of what has occurred to understand what work Swaney has done to the site, especially how much and what type of fill was added. 

“We need better information, and until we have better information, I think that the best answer is don’t allow further work because that’s what got us where we are today,” Knapp said. 

Gaudio warned that if the commission hears that work is being done on the site, they will start litigation.


February 28, 2024

CT Construction Digest Wednesday February 28, 2024

Torrington school project ahead of schedule

SLOAN BREWSTER

TORRINGTON – The city is planning to sell $14 million in bonds Thursday for the new high/middle school and various road improvement projects.

Mayor Elinor C. Carbone said Tuesday she had received a call from the city’s bonds adviser letting her know he had spoken with Standard & Poor’s – the city’s bond rating remains AA- with a stable outlook. The mayor said she planned to offer feedback on a draft report about the rating.

The phone call, report and daily calls from the adviser this month are all precursors to the bond sales, Carbone said.

“I get daily communications from the bond counsel and bond adviser, just sort of framing what the market is demanding, how saturated is the market and what are they seeing in terms of the bonds,” she said. “It all leads up to (the bond sale).”

A bond sale is a loan from an investor to a borrower, in this case the city government.

The $14 million in general obligation bonds includes $10 million for high school construction and $4 million for roadwork.

The city also is issuing $34 million in bond anticipation notes – short-term notes the city is borrowing against upcoming bonds- to provide cash flow to continue paying construction costs for the high school, Carbone said.

The anticipation notes will cover the cost of monthly labor on the construction site, which fluctuates depending on what’s being done on a given month, the mayor said. For example, elements such as steel require highly skilled labor while electrical work can be done with fewer people.

“So those monthly invoices reflect the skilled labor that’s on site at that time,” she said.

Invoices have been ranging between $8 million and $9 million per month, Carbone said. As the building moves closer to completion and larger construction work is done, those costs will start to drop, reflecting smaller items inside the building.

“They’re starting to close the building in and we’re going to, over the next nine months, see this drop from $8 million a month down to $6, $5, $4 (million),” she said.

Ground officially was broken on the $179.58 million project in October 2022. Building committee Co-Chairman Edward Arum said the state will reimburse 85% of the construction costs and the city is responsible for 15%.

Initial plans for the 310,000-square-foot school, which will house students in grades 7-12, were to complete the high school portion by December 2024 and bring students in by February 2025. Middle school students are expected to be let in by September 2025.

Construction, however, is ahead of schedule and plans are to open the school a month early in January 2025, Arum said.

Brick is up on the exterior, glass is being installed, and the cafeteria and middle school gym are being constructed.

The $4 million in roadwork will pay for projects this spring, summer and fall, Carbone said. The list includes reclaiming and redesigning Migeon Avenue, the Riverview parking lot beside the library, as well as various other roads, curbs and sidewalks.

“It’s here, there and everywhere,” she said.


Aquarion, Eversource to restart work in Wilton on water pipeline, gas main near New Canaan border

Karen Tensa

WILTON — Work is expected to restart March 1 as Aquarion Water Co. and Eversource Energy return to their pipe installation projects in Wilton along New Canaan Road/Route 106, according to a statement from the town.   

The start date may depend on weather conditions and any remaining requirements from the state Department of Transportation, according to the statement. 

The Aquarion work is part of the southwest regional pipeline transmission water main, and the Eversource project is part of a New Canaan to Wilton gas main. 

The DOT issued a permit for Aquarion and Eversource to continue installing pipes in 2024 as the utility companies said they strive "to improve vital water and natural gas infrastructure for the area." 

The town reviewed the permit and required Aquarion and Eversource "to adhere to additional conditions regarding traffic flow and works hours," the town statement said.  

The DOT will oversee day-to-day operations of the project because New Canaan Road is a state roadway. 

Construction will resume in March with work to extend the 36-inch water main and 16-inch gas main westward along New Canaan Road/Route 106 from Old Boston Road to the New Canaan town line, Aquarion and Eversource said in a joint statement. 

A detour will send traffic along Old Boston Road and Old Kings Highway during work hours, according to the utility companies. 

The road surface will be temporarily restored with asphalt daily. Aquarion will install a temporary 1-inch asphalt overlay at the end of the 2024 construction season. In 2025, that asphalt will be excavated to install a new permanent pavement.

After both pipes are extended to the New Canaan town line, water and gas pipelines will be installed on Silvermine Road/Route 106 between Carter Street and Valley Road in New Canaan this year.

Here is what residents and motorists can expect: 

• Construction for this phase of the project is scheduled to begin March 1 and end in November.
• The roadway will be closed to thru traffic during the construction hours of 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. weekdays. The hours may be extended in the summer, upon approval of the town of Wilton and DOT.
• Traffic control, including police officers, flaggers and signs, will maintain safe work zones and ensure unobstructed passage for emergency vehicles. 
• All school bus stops will remain at their current locations. The roadway will remain open for school buses and emergency vehicles. All other vehicular traffic will follow traffic control and posted detour routes.
• Residents living within the project area should coordinate with traffic control for access to their property.
• Incidental work may also occur on Route 106 between Belden Hill and Old Boston Road. 
• Electronic billboards will inform the public of work details and provide daily updates.
• Project updates will be posted at www.aquarionwater.com/infrastructure-projects.

Residents with questions about the project can contact Frank Smeriglio, director of public works and town engineer for Wilton at 203-563-0153; Hadley Boyd, coordinator of communication and community relations for the Office of the First Selectman, at 203-563-0129, ext. 1146; Dennis Fields, Aquarion Water project representative, at 203-258-6139; or Ken Zembrzuski, Eversource project representative, at 860-665-3452.


Reopening North Stamford's Cedar Heights Road bridge delayed again: 'An extremely complex process'

Brianna Gurciullo

STAMFORD — The completion date for a bridge replacement project on Cedar Heights Road has been pushed back another month.

The bridge project was initially expected to be completed November 2023. But City Engineer Lou Casolo said last year that plans for water handling, bridge demolition and supporting utilities went through “multiple rounds” of review, resulting in delays.

Then, the goal was to accomplish “substantial completion” by the end of May

Now, the date is June 31, according to a presentation Casolo gave to the Board of Representatives’ Operations Committee on Monday about bridge projects in the city.

Reps. Don Mays, D-19, and Carl Weinberg, D-20, specifically requested a discussion about projects in and around their districts, which cover parts of North Stamford. Weinberg said their constituents are “clamoring for accurate information” about each project’s status. 

The Cedar Heights Road bridge replacement “is an extremely complex project due to the utility relocations that are involved,” Casolo told city representatives. “But with all of that said, we continue to move the project along, although it’s moving slowly.”

A bridge on Wire Mill Road is also slated for construction work, Casolo said, but the detour route for the project depends on the Cedar Heights Road bridge being open.

“So the contractor who’s working on Cedar Heights is impacting our ability to move (the Wire Mill Road) project forward,” Casolo said. “I’m currently working with the administration to resolve this issue.”

Casolo has previously said that the contractor is A. Vitti Excavators, which has continued work during the winter months. A request for comment from the company wasn’t immediately answered.

On Monday, Mays asked Casolo if contractors face penalties when they miss project deadlines.

“There is a provision in the contract for liquidated damages, and it’s a daily penalty if they don't deliver the project on time,” Casolo said.

He said city and state officials are looking at a contract extension for the Cedar Heights Road project.

If an extension “can be justified ... the liquidated damages don’t apply to those days that are given to the contractor,” Casolo said. “But if it can’t be substantiated, then the liquidated damages are basically taken out of the invoices from the contractor.”

Casolo has said that the Federal Local Bridge Program, which the state Department of Transportation administers, is funding the project. It involves a split of 80 percent federal funding and 20 percent city funding.

The bid cost of the project was about $2.8 million, Casolo has said.


Potential Manchester warehouse is likely to face 'very big' public hearing

Joseph Villanova

MANCHESTER — A potential warehouse project on the East Hartford and South Windsor borders could face pushback from residents if the developer moves forward with an application.

New Fairfield-based TRAC Consulting submitted a "pre-application review" for a 150,800-square-foot distribution warehouse with 30 loading bays at 71 and 81 Commerce Road, located within an existing industrial park. The site is currently vacant but lies next to a residential subdivision in East Hartford.

The developer has not yet filed an application for the project and sought feedback from town staff and Planning and Zoning Commission members at a meeting last week.

Tom Riley, architect with TRAC Consulting, said last week that the warehouse would be a speculative construction with no occupants planned ahead of time, but could host up to three tenants.

Riley said the developer does not own the property yet, but is in a pre-purchase agreement for both parcels.

PZC Chairman Eric Prause said last week that although the property lies within an industrial park, the proximity to a residential zone could lead to a "very big" public hearing if TRAC Consulting moves forward with an application.

"It's probably an inevitability that it's going to turn into a very tough hearing," Prause said.

Prause said the application would have to be approved by special exception, meaning that members of the public would likely testify about concerns like noise pollution.

The application could run the risk of rejection "if the commission feels swayed by the testimony," Prause said.

Riley said the developer understands and does not discount the residential area in its plan.

"We have to consider that in our design, and we believe we have," Riley said.

Riley said any potential disturbances to nearby homes should be mitigated from the proposed lighting plan, the height difference, and vegetation that would help screen the building off, and the placing of loading docks away from the residential border.

Riley said TRAC Consulting had concerns about wetlands that had formed on the site.

"Unfortunately, we started this project in October," Riley said. "Between rain and snow, it's been difficult to go through everything."

Environmental Planner David Laiuppa said last week that he recently walked the site a few times and found wetlands that were "tricky" to properly determine.

"There's a lot of small questionable areas," Laiuppa said. "It's something that should be reviewed again in the spring."

Laiuppa said there will also be a study conducted to see if there is a vernal pool on site.

The PZC's feedback on the project is non-binding, as no application has been filed yet.

PZC Secretary Michael Stebe said last week that the site feels appropriate for the potential development, as it's down the road from the Winstanley Logistics Property and has easy access to Interstate 291.

"This makes logical sense that it'd be where it is," Stebe said.

PZC Vice Chairman Patrick Kennedy said last week that the proposal seems like a "relatively conventional" warehouse development, other than the wetlands concerns.


February 27, 2024

CT Construction Digest Tuesday February 28, 2024

Stamford train station's new parking garage finally opens: 'A long time coming'

Brianna Gurciullo

STAMFORD — As federal, state and local officials celebrated the opening of the new parking garage for the Stamford train station Monday, at least three used essentially the same phrase to describe the occasion: “a long time coming.”

Those officials included Connecticut Department of Transportation Commissioner Garrett Eucalitto.

“I went back and looked at some of the history of this project,” Eucalitto said during a news conference at the new garage Monday morning. “I think the first big news stories about it were back in 2007 ... And it took a long time, a lot of cooperation between the DOT and the city of Stamford, to get us to this point.”

At one point, the garage was supposed to open by the end of summer 2023. But months later, pieces for elevator shafts and elevator and stairwell enclosures still hadn’t arrived.

On Monday, Mayor Caroline Simmons laid out the features of the new facility: 914 parking spots, 92 charging stations for electric vehicles and 120 bike spaces. 

More than 28,000 commuters use the Stamford Transportation Center every day, Simmons said, referring to pre-pandemic data. From the parking garage, travelers will have access to the Track 5 platform as well as a pedestrian bridge to the station.

State bonding funded the $100 million project, according to a release from Gov. Ned Lamont’s office. Coinciding with the garage’s opening, state officials released a master plan for an overhaul of the train station

At Monday’s press conference, Lamont described the station as “the gateway to New England.”

“This is people’s first impressions of our amazing state,” Lamont said. “And the train station’s OK. I think it was designed by a Soviet architect who forgot his glasses myself, but it’s time for a redo, it’s time for an upgrade.”

Eucalitto said the garage is the first state DOT facility to have electric bike lockers and charging stations. He also highlighted the more than 200,000 LED lights that wrap around the building, saying they would project the colors of the state flag Monday.

The station’s old parking garage, which was built in the 1980s, will start undergoing demolition next month, Eucalitto said. The process is estimated to take six months.

“That will allow us, in partnership with the city, to go out and do real transit-oriented development on that parcel, one of the most important parcels in the state of Connecticut,” he said.

U.S. Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., said it’s “an opportunity for retail, for commercial space, maybe even for housing, that will really create a hub around here.”

State Sen. Ceci Maher, D-Wilton, said the new garage “makes life easier” for commuters and others traveling to New York City. 

“If any of you have tried to park in the other garage in order to go get a train, you know that you’re going around and around and you’re looking for a place to park and getting panicked that you’re going to miss your train,” she said.

Simmons said the city has more plans for the area around the train station, including “investing in hundreds of units of workforce housing” and making changes to Washington Boulevard in an effort to improve safety.


Stamford group wants city to close piece of Garden Street to make it more attractive to developer

Brianna Gurciullo

STAMFORD — The owners of a set of properties in Stamford’s South End want the city to permanently close the street that divides the small blocks their properties sit on in the hopes, they said, that it will make their land more attractive to a developer.

The Board of Representatives could pass a resolution as soon as next week that says it is considering the idea of discontinuing a section of Garden Street, which splits the properties that are surrounded by Manhattan Street, Pacific Street, Dock Street and Atlantic Street.

At a meeting of the board’s Land Use-Urban Redevelopment Committee, South End Rep. Terry Adams, D-3, said the two blocks near Stamford’s train station have “been an eyesore for quite a while now.” There have been two fires in the area in recent years as well as a “tremendous amount” of illegal dumping, he said.

Blighted properties on the site were recently demolished, and a temporary fence was set up to try to prevent dumping, said city Director of Administration Ben Barnes.

Barnes said that combining the two blocks would “increase the development potential” of the spot. The properties are located within the city’s Transportation Center Design District, where high-density mixed-use development is encouraged. 

But Shippan Rep. Thomas Kuczynski, R-1, said that without more information about what the property owners planned to do with the land, it seemed “premature” to permanently shut down the street segment. 

Barnes, in response, said their plans depend on whether the city is willing to discontinue the street. But Kuczynski pushed back.

“The intended use — which at this point is speculative — has a direct bearing on the value of this piece of property here,” Kuczynski said. “There’s no rush for us to move forward until we have the context of how that property is proposed to be redeveloped, and it’s only in that context that a fair valuation for our citizens can be delivered.”

Barnes said that if the full board passes the resolution, it would mark just the first step toward discontinuing the street segment.

The next step in the process would involve an engineering study and property appraisal, both of which would become part of a public report that weighs the costs and benefits of closing the street, he said. After a public hearing, the report would go before the Planning Board, Board of Finance and Board of Representatives.

Barnes said it could take three to five months for the report to reach the boards. 

Land use consultant Rick Redniss said the property owners don’t intend to develop the site themselves. If the street is discontinued, Redniss said that either some or all of the owners would look to buy the land. Then they would try to sell the entire site to either a for-profit or nonprofit developer.

“Unknowns, in real estate, devalue property,” Redniss told the committee. If it is clear that the street will close, “then a developer knows, ‘OK, that’s ready. Now I can start the zoning process,’” he said.

Rep. Carmine Tomas, D-15, floated an idea: What if the city maintained ownership of the street and joined the other property owners in selling to a developer?

“Then once the parcel sells ... that revenue goes into the city of Stamford’s pocketbook,” Tomas said.

Barnes said the idea made him feel “uneasy.”

“I’ve only seen such (city) involvement in real estate transactions where there was some other public purpose involved other than making money, although I suppose that’s a possibility,” he said. “I’ll give that some additional thought.”

Kuczynski voiced support for Tomas’ suggestion, saying the city could “receive a disproportionately high portion of the total sell, reflecting the unique value of Garden Street enabling for one contiguous assemblage, which increases the total value.”

The committee amended the resolution to say that the potential street closure “presents opportunities for the city to realize significant financial and other benefits” and that the Board of Representatives is “interested in exploring the possibility of retaining the Garden Street land and potentially selling it in coordination with (the other property owners) to another entity for future use to maximize the benefit to city residents.”

The amendment initially referred to “taxpayers,” but Rep. James Grunberger, D-18, suggested that the committee change the language to “residents” to reflect the board’s intent “not just to get the last dollar out of (the land) but to also enhance the quality of life in the neighborhood.”

Redniss said the property owners came together as the “Stamford Manhattan Transit Group” more than a decade ago “as part of protecting themselves from what was happening around them.”

Barnes explained that the area went through significant changes during the building of the Stamford Urban Transitway. As part of the project, the city acquired parts of properties using eminent domain, making way for construction work on Atlantic Street and Dock Street.

“A number of the property owners had their property carved up,” Barnes said. “Their whole street was — and all the uses there were — heavily disrupted by that action.”

The properties became part of a plan to build a mix of office, retail, hotel, residential and parking space by the train station. But the proposal, led by John McClutchy of the JHM Group of Companies, eventually died

“For quite a number of years, the property was not under the control of the owners but was under the control of a development entity that was seeking to redevelop the property,” Barnes said. “During that time, obviously, it would have been impossible for them to have invested in their properties.”

Redniss said that after the owners regained control of the properties, they spent more than $500,000 to clean up the site.

Last year, the city sold two small parcels it still owned at 560 Atlantic St. and 13 Manhattan St. to SMTG LLC.


Enfield opposes proposed solar facility, will look into hiring an expert to intervene

Susan Danseyar

ENFIELD — Town officials are vehemently opposed to a proposed solar facility at 141 Town Farm Road and will be looking into hiring an expert to intervene on the town's behalf.

Lonestar Energy of Avon has petitioned the Connecticut Siting Council for a ruling on constructing and operating a solar electric-generating facility on a 12.1-acre property that would include putting up a total of 4,702 panels off Town Farm and Abbe roads. The surrounding area includes a mix of farming and residential development.

Enfield must contact the Siting Council by March 9 to apply for intervenor status which, if approved, would allow a representative of the town to speak during a scheduled hearing against the proposed facility.

At their Feb. 20 meeting, Enfield Town Council members debated the cost to hire an expert to be the town's intervenor. Mayor Ken Nelson said surrounding towns can also have intervenor status on this particular petition and suggested Enfield could consider working with area communities on going in together to hire an expert, saying that might have more leverage against the Siting Council.

The Siting Council has jurisdiction above towns and cities on certain infrastructure projects, including solar energy facilities and telecommunications projects. Although Enfield can provide comment and testimony on Lonestar's proposal, the Siting Council has the ultimate authority on whether it will be approved.

Officials and residents have been frustrated for a while with the lack of local control over which — or if — solar facilities come into the town. They join a number of towns across the state that say the facilities take up farmland and detract from the rural character of communities. They also say the proximity of sites to residential neighborhoods amplifies the impact of any issues the project could cause, such as noise pollution.

Enfield currently has several other solar facilities, including one at 110 North St. at a former golf driving range, at 291 Shaker Road near the Robinson Correctional Institution, and another off Broad Brook Road.

Town Council member Michael Ludwick has advised that Enfield fight back against the Siting Council's authority over local zoning.

"We've done our part to support solar fields and I don't want to see government overreach with the council destroying our beautiful farmland," he said at the Feb. 20 meeting.

Residents began coming to Town Council meetings in the fall to report their concerns about the proposed facility. Barbara Audet on Nov. 20 said she has lived on Abbe Road for 28 years and moved there because of its farmland. She said the solar facility would be quite close to her backyard and is concerned about how it might affect her property's value.

Jennifer Krasinkiewicz, who also lives on Abbe Road and spoke at the Nov. 20 meeting, said surveyors had been working on the farmland behind her house and she was trying to get information on what she heard would be a solar farm less than 30 feet from her backyard. 

The women returned to speak at the Dec. 4 Town Council meeting, asking for direction on what they could do and where they should go to fight the project.

If the project is approved by the Siting Council, Lodestar said construction would require 0.19 acres of tree clearing. Once complete, the application states, the facility will occupy approximately 10.15 acres inside a fence, with an additional 1.95 acres of improvements beyond the fenced limits, for a total area of about 12.1 acres. 

The construction period would take approximately six to nine months should it be approved, the application states, and construction would begin in early 2025. Lonestar anticipates the operational life of the facility would be over 20 years. 


Whole Foods, T.J. Maxx to anchor new retail center in Cheshire

Luther Turmelle

The retail component of Stone Bridge Crossing, the sprawling mixed use complex off of Interstate 691 in Cheshire will be anchored by a Whole Foods Market and a T.J. Maxx, the owner of the property on which the stores will be developed has announced.

Officials with Florida-based Regency Centers announced the first two tenants of the complex's retail portion, ending months of speculation. The retail portion of the complex, which will be a 152,000 square foot shopping center located near the intersection of Route 10 and I-691, will be know as Cheshire Crossing.

In addition to the supermarket and the 23,000 square-foot T.J. Maxx, there will be an additional 18,000-square feet of smaller anchors, said Rebecca Wing, vice president of investments for Regency Centers.

"Cheshire Crossing is a great example of how Regency is remaining active in the region," Wing said.  “We have a long history and working relationship with Whole Foods Market, and we look forward to demonstrating continued success as long-term stewards of this shopping center.”

Whole Foods currently has 11 stores in Connecticut and is nearing completion of another supermarket in Stamford. The Cheshire Whole Foods store is one of two in the development pipeline, with the other being proposed in Old Saybrook.

T.J. Maxx has two dozen Connecticut stores.

Andrew Martelli, Cheshire's director of economic development and grants, said Regency Centers officials have told the town they hope to have the new stores open by late 2025, in advance of the holiday season. Eric Davidson, a Regency Centers spokesman, said he expects both Whole Foods and T.J. Maxx to be open by the spring of 2026, with the remainder of retailers opening during a 12-month period after that.

"We're looking at tenants in the food and beverage, health and fitness, as well as general retail sectors, Davidson said of prospective tenants.

Whole Foods and T.J. Maxx are taking two of the largest spaces in Cheshire Crossing, according to Martelli.

"There's still an 18,000 square foot space and a 10,000 square foot space where tenants haven't been announced," he said. "We've been told the plan is to announce the tenants in small groups as they sign leases."

In addition to the Cheshire Crossing stores, Stone Bridge Crossing will have a gas station and convenience store, as well as 140 townhomes and carriage house living units, 300 apartments, and a 125-room Homewood Suites hotel.

Construction of the townhomes started well over a year ago, and construction of the apartment complex began in the second half of 2023.


Manchester mixed-use apartment project wins town approvals

Skyler Frazer

A33-unit mixed-use apartment development in Manchester has won initial approvals from the town.

The project proposed by 3 Squared LLC includes knocking down an existing former bank branch on-site, at 14 North Main St., and building a new 11,600-square-foot three-story apartment building. The development was granted a special exception approval by the Manchester Planning and Zoning Commission last week, and also had its erosion and sedimentation control plans approved, according to town documents, so developers can move forward with the project.

The developer lists Nicholas Martino, Louis Roy Evjen and Isaac Shweky as principals, state records show.

Plans for the new L-shaped building include 33 residential units: 10 studios; 18 one-bedroom units; and five two-bedroom apartments. Five retail spaces will be available on the first floor, totalling 4,250 square feet, and a rooftop patio and garden is also planned.

The plans also include 9,400 square feet of open recreational space, according to documents from the town.


Bradley Airport gets federal funding for new 80,000-sq.-ft. baggage inspection facility

Andrew Larson

Bradley International Airport has received $5.4 million in federal funding for the ongoing construction of an 80,000-square-foot checked baggage inspection system behind the Sheraton Hotel.

The project will enable baggage to be sent from airline ticket counters on a mile-long conveyor belt to the new facility for screening. 

Once the new system is in operation, current explosive-detection machines located in the terminal lobby will be removed. 

The project will free up space for current and future airlines and create additional gate space for aircraft, according to an announcement from the Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA).

“The CAA is extremely appreciative of the funding we’ve received from the federal government as we continue to develop and enhance Bradley International Airport,” said Kevin A. Dillon, executive director of the CAA. 

The funding comes from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which has set aside $970 million in grants for its Airport Terminal Program, which is part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. 

The FAA is providing funding to 104 airports across the country, focusing on terminal reconstruction, development, accessibility and energy efficiency.

In addition to the $5.4 million, Bradley received $76 million from the FAA in 2023 for the new checked baggage inspection facility.

The total cost of the project is estimated at $151 million. The balance will be paid for by passenger facility charges and airport revenue.

“This significant investment in Connecticut’s transportation infrastructure will be a gamechanger for passengers at Bradley International Airport – streamlining the check-in process and allowing for more gates, which increases the number of flight options,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn).

Bradley is New England’s second-largest airport and has a nearly $3.6 billion economic impact on the regional economy, according to the CAA.