February 12, 2026

CT Construction Digest Thursday February 12, 2026

Middletown begins environmental testing at Return to the Riverbend sites

Mary Ellen Godin

MIDDLETOWN — Environmental testing along the shoreline is expected to continue through the spring as part of Middletown's plan to clean and stabilize the riverfront, officials said.

The city is using part of a $12 million Community Investment Fund grant it received in 2022 to begin the geotechnical and design work needed to clean up a trio of River Road properties.

The funding covers site work and demolition of the area and kicks off the Return to the Riverbend project along the Connecticut River

This phase of the project “is in order to finalize a Remediation Act Plan and design two concepts for shore stabilization,” said Middletown Economic and Community Director Christine Marques. “These activities have commenced and will continue through the spring.”

The 10-year Return to the Riverbend vision includes the sweeping redevelopment of 220 acres of land in Downtown Middletown — from Harbor Park to where Silver Street meets River Road, along approximately two miles of waterfront.

Highlights include new parks and walking trails; a pedestrian bridge that crosses Route 9; multi-family housing, and events and commercial space. Multi-phase construction is expected to span 10 years and cost hundreds of millions of dollars. 

The goal is to reconnect the community to the river, convert underused and contaminated sites into vibrant public spaces, and advance Middletown’s Return to the Riverbend master plan, according to engineering consultant VHB of Rocky Hill. 

The company is supporting the city in all technical aspects of the project, including preparing specifications, cost estimates, and assisting with contractor bidding and permitting, according to a November 2025 announcement. 

“As a longtime resident of Middletown, seeing this project come to fruition has been so rewarding,” said VHB’s Director of Environmental Services Amy Vaillancourt when announcing the company’s involvement. “VHB has been involved in reviving Middletown’s riverfront for many years, from securing community investment grant funding to volunteering at the Connecticut River Conservancy’s annual Source to Sea Cleanup. We’re proud to play a role in this restoration effort, which will provide numerous community benefits for years to come.”

The state funding covers the cost of remediating a property outside of the floodplain for mixed use development; cleanup and demolition of the three properties; engineering and design of public spaces, including pedestrian and bike-friendly pathways; riverbank stabilization and resiliency of shoreline, and flood mitigation, officials said. 

 VHB is also evaluating the former Jackson Corrugated plant to prepare demolition plans and specifications. The demolition is expected to be publicly bid late spring or early summer, Marques said. The master plan calls for an outdoor concert venue near the old company.

Environmental testing is being done at the former Peterson Oil company and at a decommissioned wastewater treatment plant, also on River Road. Testing results will help finalize remediation efforts, officials aid. 

The initial public engagement phase for the master plan involved community forums and workshops in 2020 and 2021.

In 2024, the city paid $3 million to purchase the one-acre Attention to Detail auto shop to make way for the proposed, block-size Village at Riverside mixed use development bordered by Court and Main streets and deKoven and Dingwall drives.

About 600 parking spaces are expected to be created, along with housing including 19 townhomes and 258 studios, one- and two-bedroom units. There would also be a public square and various shops. The master plan also calls for an outdoor concert venue near the old Jackson Corrugated site.

Details of the Return to the Riverbend Master Plan can be found at middletownct.gov/1279/RETURN-TO-THE-RIVERBEND.


Plainfield commission postpones action on Costco zone change, again

Alison Cross

Plainfield — A decisive vote that could make or break Costco’s proposal for a massive, 1.1 million-square-foot distribution center on the Plainfield-Canterbury town line has been pushed back for at least another month.

In a split-decision vote on Tuesday, the Planning and Zoning Commission gave Costco a win by approving amendments to the town’s zoning regulations that provide commissioners discretion to accommodate certain lighting, setback and building-design needs of the project.

However, the commission stopped short of granting Costco’s request for a zone change that would transform more than 200 acres of land into an I-2 Industrial District that permits the construction of any warehousing and distribution facility that passes a site plan review.

Commissioners voted 4-1 to continue deliberations regarding the zone change to their next meeting on March 10. June Gagne, who cast the sole dissenting vote against Costco’s text amendment request, also voted no on the continuance.

Costco's applications have been on the commission's agenda since Jan. 13. Zone changes and text amendments for the Canterbury portion of the project were approved by the Canterbury Planning and Zoning Commission on Jan. 8.

Costco’s plan to use Route 12 as the distribution center’s sole access point for tractor-trailers hinges on the requested zone change, which would convert nearly 150 acres of residentially zoned RA-30 land and 60 acres of I-1 Industrial land into an I-2 Industrial classification.

Under the plan, Costco would construct a driveway at the site of the vacant Frank O’Connell Handcraft Museum Annex Building to connect the distribution center in Canterbury to Route 12. The operation is expected to add 1,287 new tractor-trailer trips to the road each weekday, according to Costco’s traffic study.

The zone change would also clear the way for Costco to one day add a second 1.1 million-square-foot distribution center on the Plainfield side of the property. Costco representatives said the addition of that facility depends on the company's growth. If it comes to fruition, the number of new tractor-trailer trips on town roads each day would total 2,844.

Continued pushback

Costco representatives and town leaders — including First Selectman Kevin Cunningham, former First Selectman Paul Sweet and Selectman Michael Surprenant — have touted the project’s potential to grow tax revenue and add 250 warehouse jobs and 129 temporary construction jobs to the local economy.

At Tuesday night’s public hearing on Costco’s proposal, residents continued to speak against the project and the new traffic, pollution, noise and light it would generate.

Most of the speakers live near the proposed construction site, which would abut the Tarbox Road, Margaret Lane, Louis Lane and Douglas Drive neighborhood to the north and the Toper Road, North Street and South Street neighborhood to the south.

“Costco has faced multiple lawsuits and quiet settlements in how they handle the disposal of hazardous waste," South Street resident Angela Fuller said, referencing information from a violation-tracking database run by the organization Good Jobs First. "They've been fined by the EPA for Clean Air Act violations (and) have several environmental review lawsuits. Public data shows over a hundred penalty records since 2000, exceeding $98 million in penalties and fines.”

“Our little neighbor has been here since the '60s. The people in our neighborhood chose to build here or move here based on the rural landscape, quiet atmosphere and great neighborhoods to raise our families, not to profit or disturb the environment,” Fuller added.

During deliberations after the public hearing closed, commission members appeared poised to reject Costco’s zone change, for all or some of the five parcels included in the request.

Chairwoman Karla Desjardins said she would not be opposed to rezoning parcels at 1197 Norwich Road and 407 Tarbox Road to I-2 Industrial, given that 1197 Norwich Road is currently classified as I-1 Industrial and 407 Tarbox Road directly abuts it.

However, Desjardins said she would not rezone the remaining three RA-30 residentially zoned parcels at 0 Howe Road, 0 Tarbox Road and 0 Pine Lane, which abut other residential zones.

“In everything we do, the goal is balance,” Desjardins said. “We do have flexibility, because we are in our planning legislative mode and we are looking to the Plan of Conservation and Development for guidance.”

Gagne reiterated that one of the goals of the town’s Plan of Conservation and Development is “to provide the opportunity for all households in Plainfield to live in a safe, sanitary, attractive home and neighborhood.”

“I don’t think any of this is going to help that goal,” Gagne said. 


CT secures about $190 million in earmarks from federal bills

Lisa Hagen

Connecticut will receive tens of millions of dollars in federal funding for local projects, marking the first time in a two years that states will benefit from earmarked funding for infrastructure initiatives, affordable housing development and education.

The state’s congressional delegation secured a combined total of more than $190 million to support over 175 projects in their districts and statewide. Dozens of towns and cities will see a windfall in federal funding whether for fire house renovations, police training, boosts for museums or transportation projects.

The funding — formerly known as earmarks — was tucked into spending packages that Congress passed in both November and February to fund most of the government through September. Several of Connecticut’s earmark requests, worth more than $10 million, however, are still tied up in the embattled bill to fund the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Those seem unlikely to materialize amid ongoing negotiations.

During each annual appropriations cycle, lawmakers can make requests to steer money to their states and districts. But those dollars don’t become a reality if Congress can’t pass full-year spending bills and instead rely on short-term continuing resolutions, which have become the norm in recent years.

Earmarks included in fiscal year 2026 bills were delayed as Congress worked through a tumultuous funding process in recent months that led to two government shutdowns — a record-long one in the fall and another that closed half a dozen agencies for a few days in January.

But congressional appropriators see it as a major feat that they were able to return to a more regular process to fund most agencies through the rest of the fiscal year. U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-3rd District, ranking member on the House Appropriations Committee, touted that bipartisan spending agreements rejected billions of dollars in proposed funding cuts by President Donald Trump, particularly for health and social services.

Instead, appropriators were able to increase funding by $415 million for the National Institutes of Health, $66 billion for rental assistance and $170 million for Head Start and child care.

“We put meaningful constraints on the Trump administration’s ability to abuse the budget process — reclaiming Congress’s power of the purse and reining in Project 2025 author Russ Vought,” DeLauro said in a statement last week as the partial government shutdown ended.

Across Connecticut’s five-member House delegation, lawmakers secured a total of $65 million for 64 projects, though many of those requests were made alongside their Senate colleagues. The state’s biggest cities historically benefit greatly, but the funding requests reach dozens of municipalities in all corners of the state.

In the House, some of the projects were requested solely by the member, while others can be a joint request with the senators from their state.

Senate earmarks, meanwhile, are requested jointly by Connecticut’s Democratic senators, Chris Murphy and Richard Blumenthal. They secured more than $126 million in Senate-only funding across the spending bills (not counting the ones made alongside a lawmaker in Connecticut’s House delegation).

About $21 million will go toward housing-related projects in Connecticut, with the vast majority for affordable housing development in places like Bridgeport, New Britain, New Haven, Norwalk, Goshen and New London.

Universities across the state will also get a sizable boost from the funding bills. The University of Connecticut’s small business development center will receive $885,000 to help with “digital transformation” of small businesses in the state. Southern Connecticut State University will get $2.2 million to help with a “high-tech community and workforce development hub.” And Central Connecticut State University will see $850,000 to similarly benefit its workforce and innovation hub.

Earmarks, now known as community project funding in the House and congressionally directed spending in the Senate, had faced a 10-year ban. DeLauro, who was then-chairwoman of the House Appropriations Committee, helped revive them in 2021 by introducing more limits and new rules aiming to help with transparency. Earmarks cannot exceed 1% of total discretionary spending.

Lawmakers and their immediate families must certify they have no financial ties to their requests. State, local and tribal governments as well as nonprofit entities can receive funding. But different rules apply for the House and Senate. House members can request up to 15 projects, but there is no cap on the number for senators.

Earmarks can be divisive. They can be mutually advantageous for members of Congress and the people they represent. Others see them as extraneous measures for pet projects that balloon congressional spending.

Politically, they are a way for members to tout the money they are bringing back home, especially in an election year, by bestowing recipients with oversized checks.

U.S. Rep. John Larson, who faces his first competitive primary since he was first elected to Connecticut’s 1st Congressional District, recently held a press conference with one of the recipients: Mothers United Against Violence’s Victim Impact Project. The group has received $1.8 million in federal funding over the past five years.

“The $500,000 in federal funding we announced today will support their work to prevent violence before it happens while providing families of victims and survivors with the support they need to heal,” Larson said late last month. “The entire Connecticut delegation, led by Rosa DeLauro on the House Appropriations Committee, will continue to deliver the critical funding groups like Mothers United needs to keep our children safe and end the horrific gun violence epidemic plaguing our nation.”

DeLauro highlighted her own earmark while talking about reforms that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, could benefit from, like de-escalation training.

“I did a community project in my district. The University of New Haven asked for $1.5 million for de-escalation training for municipal police departments. De-escalation training is critically important,” DeLauro told reporters last week from the U.S. Capitol. “We have four regional centers for de-escalation training in the United States.”

One earmark request was rescinded last year amid a federal investigation looking into state Sen. Douglas McCrory’s involvement with entities that receive state and federal funding and his relationship with Sonserae Cicero, who runs some of those groups.

SHEBA Resource Center, a nonprofit run by Cicero, sought federal funding through the earmarks process a couple of times. She asked Connecticut’s senators to make a request of $3.5 million for fiscal year 2026. That money would have been used to help SHEBA convert a Hartford church she bought for $10 into new offices.

After news broke last summer about the investigation, the senators asked the Senate Appropriations Committee to no longer consider the $3.5 million request. It was not included in the final spending bills, and SHEBA received no federal funding.

Other earmarks sought by Connecticut, however, will be on hold as Congress works through the final bill to provide full-year for the Department of Homeland Security.

Another $10 million could flow to Connecticut if a DHS bill is eventually approved. But that looks unlikely with talk of another short-term bill or a possible shutdown of the agency coming at the end of the week.

Here is a round-up of some of the approved earmarks by Connecticut’s delegation:

U.S. Sens. Chris Murphy and Richard Blumenthal

Connecticut will see its largest earmarked funding coming from a Senate request through the bill funding Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies.

The state will see $23 million for the submarine Pier 8 replacement at SUBASE New London in Groton. The bill also includes $7 million for a project to modernize an aviation support facility for the CT Army National Guard.

U.S. Rep. John Larson, D-1st District

In his Hartford-based district, Larson secured $3.1 million for Bristol’s Fire and Police Department’s CPAT and ASHER Training Facility as well as $2 million for trail improvements for Hockanum Linear Park and another $2 million for infrastructure improvements in East Hartford.

U.S. Rep. Joe Courtney, D-2nd District

In his eastern Connecticut district, Courtney landed $2 million for the Connecticut Department of Housing to help with the expansion of affordable housing at Country Place in Colchester to rehabilitate 194 units of family housing. He also secured nearly $2 million for Mansfield to go toward the second phase of a bike and pedestrian connection project.

U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-3rd District

In her New Haven-based district, DeLauro was able to get $2.5 million for Naugatuck to go toward a Connectivity & Transit Oriented Development Project. Another $2 million in approved funding will benefit New Haven with the redevelopment of Westville Manor.

U.S. Rep. Jim Himes, D-4th District

In the southwestern corner of the state, Himes secured $2 million for Stamford’s Housing Authority and Charter Oak Communities with its redevelopment and construction of new units. Stamford will also get nearly $1.1 million for improvements in its stormwater management.

U.S. Rep. Jahana Hayes, D-5th District

In the sprawling district anchored in Waterbury, Hayes got $1.5 million for Southbury Public Library and $1.7 million for Talcott Mountain Science Center for Student Involvement in Avon.


From monorails to mega-malls: 5 unfinished or abandoned projects in Connecticut's history

Austin Mirmina

Throughout Connecticut's history, ambitious plans have sometimes fallen short.

Some projects advanced far enough to be built, only to be abandoned before they ever served their intended purpose. Others unraveled amid economic downturns, political wrangling or public outcry. From highways and power plants to transit lines and shopping malls, these five projects reflect moments when confidence outpaced reality. 

Here's a look at the history behind those big ideas – and why they failed to deliver.

'Tommy's Trolley'

It was the early 1970s, and Bradley International Airport in Windsor Locks had a parking problem – one that state officials believed could be solved by building a Disney-style monorail of their own.

The "people mover," as it was called, didn't run on rails. Instead, it traveled along a 7-foot-wide concrete track, shuttling passengers about seven-tenths of a mile between a remote 1,500-space parking lot and Bradley's terminal. The project was proposed by then-Republican Gov. Thomas Meskill's administration as a way to put Connecticut at the cutting edge of mass transit.

Built by the Ford Motor Co. for $4.4 million, the system had two cars, each 30 feet long, that could carry more than two dozen passengers at speeds of 30 mph.

Controversy quickly followed. Opponents questioned its purpose, arguing it prioritized wealthy air travelers over the need to improve mass urban transit. About 20 protesters picketed at the airport on the day construction began, The New York Times reported.

By the time the system was finished, Meskill had left office. Democratic Gov. Ella T. Grasso, Meskill's successor and a vocal critic of the project, estimated it would cost $250,000 a year in state subsidies to operate.

The parking shortage it was designed to address also faded. Airport officials soon realized drivers weren't even filling the existing 1,700-space lot closest to the terminal because they were drawn instead to private valet parking. The concrete railway was mothballed and gradually overtaken by weeds. As it sat unused, according to the Times, someone posted a sign on the structure quoting Murphy's Law: "Nothing is ever as easy as it looks."

Grasso explored selling the system but found no buyers. Dubbed "Tommy's Trolley" – after the governor who championed it – the system was dismantled in 1984 without ever carrying a paying passenger. Two of the original white-and-blue shuttle cars were on display for years at the Connecticut Trolley Museum in East Hartford. The museum's president, Andrew Borst, said this week the vehicles have since been moved to the Shore Line Trolley Museum in East Haven.

'The Stack'

"Tommy's Trolley" wasn't the only completed, multi-million-dollar project built for a future that never arrived.

Soaring over Interstate-84 in Farmington is a three-level stack of highway ramps known as “The Stack." It was built in 1969 to connect I-84 with Interstate-291, originally planned as a beltway around Hartford. A second interchange in Rocky Hill was designed to link the beltway with Interstate-91. Environmental concerns and local opposition derailed the highway project, leaving both interchanges stranded before they ever carried traffic.

For more than two decades, the unused ramps loomed over the roadway, their sweeping spans leading nowhere. At some point, a trespasser mounted a homemade street sign on the Farmington structure bearing a snarky verdict: "Neverpass."

That changed in 1992, when the state opened part of the Farmington interchange to connect I-84 with the final section of Route 9. The Hartford Courant captured the occasion with an emphatic headline: "FINALLY, THE INFAMOUS STACK IS BEING USED."

Even today, "The Stack" is only partially in use. A spokesperson for the state Department of Transportation said unused portions of the structure now serve as a controlled setting for hands-on training and vendor demonstrations, allowing the agency to "safely evaluate new equipment and stay current with industry innovations that enhance safety and operational performance."

Former NRG power plant

In 2011, as questions swirled about the future of a power plant being built on Cathole Mountain in Meriden, an NRG executive insisted the project would move forward.

“People have been wondering whether the Meriden facility is going to happen or not," Lee Davis, then the company's Northeast regional president, said at the time. "I have to tell you, we’re extremely excited about the prospects of building this out.”

Despite that optimism, the 544-megawatt, natural gas-fired power plant never came to fruition, despite a road being built and equipment brought to the site. First proposed in the 1990s as a major new source of electricity for Connecticut's grid, the Meriden plant ultimately was abandoned due to shifting energy demands and financial challenges.

The unfinished structures languished on the mountainside for years – regarded by many locals as an eyesore – before being demolished in 2014.

After the project was scrapped, the city, which owns the roughly 300 acres surrounding the former plant, commissioned two studies in 2015 to evaluate options for redevelopment. The studies found that extending utilities and improving access roads up the mountain would cost $13 million, a hurdle that complicated future plans.

Officials also explored installing solar panels on a nearby parcel once used to store construction equipment, but that idea was dropped after the public expressed concerns about aesthetics and said the panels would limit future development.

The former power plant site remains privately owned and its long-term future is uncertain.

Danbury and Harlem Traction Co.

At the turn of the 20th century, Danbury was a rail town.

The city had three rail lines – each with its own station – connecting it to coastal Connecticut, New York and beyond, according to the Danbury Railway Museum. As a premier hub of the American hat industry, the city grew into a busy market center, drawing visitors from across the region for commerce and its popular annual fair, according to an article written by transportation historian and Columbia University employee Joseph Brennan.

During the nationwide boom in electric trolley or "traction" lines in the late 1800s and early 1900s, the Danbury and Harlem Traction Co. set out to build an interurban trolley from Danbury to Golden Gains, N.Y., where it would connect to the New York Central Railroad's Harlem Line. Supporters claimed the route could shave 15 minutes off the trip from Danbury to New York City by creating a more direct link to the rail network, according to the Ridgefield Historical Society.

Tracks were laid from the Danbury and Bethel Street Railway, which operated horsecars and electric trolleys, near the Danbury Fairgrounds west to Ridgebury Center. Beyond that point, the land was graded but rails were never installed, the Ridgefield Historical Society notes. Although trolley cars made test runs along the line in 1901, "no regular service was ever established," the society said.

The company eventually went bankrupt and was bought by the Westchester Traction Co., which announced plans to complete and extend the route, The New York Times reported in 1902. Those plans never materialized, foreshadowing the broader decline of trolley systems that would be replaced by buses and personal cars.

More than a century later, traces of the unfinished trolley line can still be found, including grading along what is now Old Trolley Road in Ridgefield.

New Haven Galleria

In the late 1990s, Long Wharf in New Haven was set to become a major retail destination.

Developers unveiled plans for a roughly $500 million waterfront shopping mall near the junction of Interstate-91 and I-95. The 1.35-million-square-foot New Haven Galleria at Long Wharf was envisioned as a glass-and-steel showcase, featuring nautical-theme "masts," an all-glass food court and outdoor dining.

Developers said they had commitments from four major department stores – Nordstrom, Macy's, Lord & Taylor and Filene's – along with 200 specialty shops. Construction was expected to begin within months of the 1996 announcement, with an opening targeted for 2001.

It never happened.

The project unraveled after a full-bore campaign by Westfield Properties, then the owner of the Connecticut Post Mall in Milford. Westfield filed more than a dozen lawsuits against the project and spent $1 million lobbying state lawmakers to stop it. The company also bought the 19.3-acre Sargent Drive property and the adjacent Pirelli Building for $20 million, effectively killing the planned mall.

"This was not going to be a Vietnam for New Haven," then-Mayor John DeStefano Jr. said in 2000 after the city pulled out of the deal. "It's not right for the city right now and it's time to take a different path."

An IKEA store eventually opened on the site, while the former Pirelli Building was converted into Hotel Marcel, billed as the nation's first net-zero hotel.

Now, Long Wharf is preparing for another overhaul, as the city moves ahead with plans to rebuild the park there and improve public access to the waterfront.