October 31, 2022

CT Construction Digest Monday October 31, 2022

Big mixed-use development proposed for former West Hartford UConn branch campus

Danbury’s west side school of the future requires a return to the zoning of 40 years ago

Rob Ryser

DANBURY — The latest stop on the city’s journey to build a $164 million upper school of the future on a hilltop overlooking Kenosia Avenue is to go back to the way zoning was 40 years ago when the biggest thing on the west side was the Danbury Fair.

Before the city can retrofit a 270,000-square-foot office complex on Apple Ridge Road into a middle school and high school academy for 1,400 students, the industrial-zoned property needs to revert to its 1979 status, when the 24 acres in question were residential, like the surrounding neighborhood.

“The purpose of the (residential) zone is to provide for low-density housing and in appropriate locations to permit limited public uses” such as schools, said Sharon Calitro, the city’s top planner, during a public hearing last month. “We have had multiple discussions in the city as a whole about the need to provide additional facilities for our increasing school population.”

Calitro is referring to an emergency effort by City Hall to catch up with runaway student enrollment in Danbury that has surpassed demographers’ projections and put the city on a tight timetable to open the new west side career academy by August 2024.

With the support of voters in June who approved $208 million in borrowing for the west side academy and other emergency classroom construction, the city has proposed what would be Connecticut’s first “wall-to-wall” academy to provide career and college training for every high school student.  

The next step is to get permission from the Zoning Commission to change the hilltop property’s use from light industrial to residential. A public hearing for all sides to be heard has been scheduled for 7:30 p.m. on Election Night, Nov. 8.

If the city’s request to change the zoning sounds straightforward, perhaps it is. The zone change is consistent with the principles of the city’s master plan, city officials said, and so far there has been nothing but support for the change. The city’s professional planning staff and Danbury’s appointed Planning Commission have already voiced their support.

Moreover, during a public hearing earlier this month about a Danbury company’s proposal to use a 1.5-acre property down the hill from the academy site to park and service concrete trucks in a 17,000-square-foot building, two city leaders and a neighborhood representative objected, in part because it would be incompatible with the new academy.

“I would ask that you deny this,” said Paul Rotello, the City Council’s Democratic majority leader, at a public hearing on Oct. 19. “Danbury is in the process of negotiating to acquire a parcel to build a high school and a middle school (nearby)… and at the end of the day (the concrete company storage site) is not particularly appropriate for that spot and for that road.”

The hilltop site for the academy overlooks a westside that has been transformed over the decades with the construction of the Danbury Fair mall and large-scale residential developments.

Today the westside continues to lead Danbury in economic development.

Because the academy site is already developed, it is an ideal location for the school district’s needs and a good fit to return to its residential roots, Calitro said.

“(The parking lot) in the back of this property used to be zoned (residential) and given the fact that the voters approved this, it could lead the Zoning Commission to conclude that this zoning change meets all of the (required) criteria,” Calitro told planners last month. “There is public water and sewer on the site, there’s not excessive slopes, and while there is some indications of wetlands, those have been avoided in the development of the parking facility.”


Former New Haven Coliseum site to begin new life as 'Square 10'

Mark Zaretsky

NEW HAVEN —  Fifteen years after the city imploded the New Haven Veterans Memorial Coliseum, construction of the first of three buildings in Phase 1 of the site's redevelopment — to be known as "Square 10" —  is about to begin, Mayor Justin Elicker and the developer announced Friday.

The five-acre site, which has been a parking lot since the Coliseum fell, is at the city's front door, where vehicles exiting Interstate 95 and Interstate 91 on Route 34 first enter downtown. It eventually will be home to 700 units, with ground-floor retail, a pool, a health club, a public plaza and other amenities.

The first building will consist of 200 apartments.

The Coliseum site, at 275 S. Orange St., "is one of the most important pieces of the Downtown Crossing redevelopment project," the city said in a release. 

"It'll be a game-changer," Elicker said Friday. "It's the welcome mat to the city for so many people that come to the train station, drive in through Route 34.

"What people have seen for years is an empty parking lot," Elicker said. "Now, they will see a dynamic, mixed use, residential-retail-office complex" that "will invite people in." 

In addition, "it will build on the already booming bioscience sector in the city and the residential (component) includes a good amount of affordable housing," he said.

“The transfer of the Coliseum site to LWLP New Haven LLC marks a major milestone in the Downtown Crossing infrastructure and development project that took patience, perseverance, and the right partner to reach,” Elicker said in the release. 

“With this closing, the City of New Haven can begin to fulfill an important piece of our Downtown Crossing initiative, a transformative project that is reconnecting neighborhoods long cut off by failed, so-called 'urban renewal' efforts of the past and creating a new neighborhood within walking distance of Union Station and the Medical District," Elicker said.

"The redevelopment of the Coliseum site will provide an assortment of new commercial, residential, office, and educational spaces that will enable new local economic growth, create new jobs, unlock new business opportunities, and provide new market and affordable housing options for New Haven residents,” he said.

“We are thrilled at last to be moving forward with construction on this site, and to be a partner in a project that is transforming New Haven,” said Clay Fowler, founding partner of Spinnaker Real Estate Partners, based in Norwalk, and a principal of LWLP New Haven LLC. 

“Spinnaker specializes in development opportunities that integrate the uniqueness and sense of place found in existing communities," Fowler said in the release. "We are constantly exploring neighborhoods that possess authenticity, connectedness, and the potential for livability.  

"We appreciate all of the hard work by the city and community stakeholders, and we’re very excited to be moving forward and getting shovels in the ground,” Fowler said.

Spinnaker took over the project in August 2019 after the original developer, Live Work Learn Play, a Montreal company that started the plan in 2013, withdrew after six years, faced with complications related to potentially moving utility lines and putting up a hotel that didn’t cost out.

"As you know, it's been a long road" with "a lot of challenges. But we've persevered and it's been a lot of hard work," said Frank Caico, vice president of development for Spinnaker and one of its partners. "But we've finally reached a point where we can put shovels in the ground. 

"I just feel very proud and we're really excited to bring this vision through to a reality," Caico said.

“The city will work with our partners to develop the Coliseum site through inclusive growth and exceptional design," said city Economic Development Administrator Michael Piscitelli. "The meaningful scientific research here in New Haven continues to drive our economy and we look forward to the next steps in the journey.”

Phase 1A of the project will include 200 apartments, about 16,000 square feet of retail space and more than 25,000 square feet of public open space, with a plaza along a “retail laneway,” officials said.

The developer will set aside 20 of those apartments as "affordable housing" for households at 50 percent to 60 percent of the area median income, and 20 units for households at 61 percent to 100 percent of the AMI.

Affordable housing was a major concern during negotiations and review of the plans, with Spinnaker at one point modifying the income range of tenants who would qualify for the affordable units  in the wake of public feedback during the review process.

The city has finalized its conveyance of Phase 1 of the site to LWLP New Haven LLC, a consortium of Spinnaker Real Estate Partners, the Fieber Group, and KDP, completing the closing Thursday, Elicker said.

Phase 1 is a 3.5-acre parcel that will be developed in three sub-phases, which will include housing, public amenities and a "life sciences" medical and lab office building, city officials said.

A groundbreaking event to kick off Phase 1A construction is scheduled for Nov. 10, officials said.  A community meeting on the project has been tentatively set for Nov. 17, 

The next two buildings, Phase 1B and Phase 1C , which still need zoning approval, will follow next year after plans are reviewed and approved by the City Plan Commission, city officials and an executive with the developer said.

Phase 1B currently calls for construction of a 650-space parking garage and an additional 75 to 100 apartments, 20 percent of which will be affordable units, officials said. The new housing will partially wrap around the garage structure.  

Phase 1C will involve the construction of a more than 200,000-square-foot medical and laboratory building with a ground-floor restaurant, officials said.

The total construction price for Phase 1A is expected to be $76 million, with the costs of the later phases still to be determined, said city spokesman Len Speiller. Estimated completion dates are 2025 for Phase 1A and 2027 for phases 1B and 1C, he said. 

Ancora L&G, based in Durham, N.C., will carry out the development of Phase 1C.  Ancora L&G specializes in building high-quality med/lab environments "in academic centers of distinction," the city said in the release.

In this case, Ancora L&G will build on research and innovation led by Yale University, as well as New Haven’s proximity to the New York and Boston metropolitan markets, the release said. Pelli Clarke & Partners, an architectural firm based in New Haven, will be the designer. 

“We at Ancora L&G are excited to be a part of the redevelopment of this important gateway corner of downtown New Haven into a vibrant, thriving, Square 10,” said Josh Parker, CEO of Ancora L&G.

“We look forward to delivering a landmark building that advances research, academic collaboration and continued growth for the region’s early stage and mature life sciences companies, while also joining with the community’s residential and retail activities to enhance the economic and social health of New Haven,” Parker said in the release.

“The building planned by Ancora L&G for Square 10 will further establish New Haven as a regional hub for bioscience and biotechnology research and innovation, improving economic outcomes for the city and residents with good-paying jobs,” said Ginny Kozlowski, CEO of the New Haven Economic Development Corporation.

Alder Carmen Rodriguez, D-6, said she appreciated the developers listening and responding to the public's input.

“It’s so gratifying to see the Downtown Crossing project taking shape and to know that the input and ideas of residents have been considered and incorporated into the plan,” Rodriguez said.

“The redevelopment of the Coliseum site is one of the last, and biggest, parts of this transformative plan and I look forward to residents once again providing input on this project to ensure that Square 10 promotes economic growth that is both inclusive and sustainable,” she said in the release. 

The city demolished the former New Haven Veterans Memorial Coliseum in 2007, and has since used the site for public parking.

Under the terms of the 2013 Development and Land Disposition Agreement, which LWLP New Haven LLC assumed in 2019, the company formally took possession of the 3.5-acre Phase 1 parcel and will serve as the developer for the overall project. Also under the terms of the agreement, the city sold the property to the developer for $1.

The company has secured $50 million in debt financing from Webster Bank, which, coupled with private equity from MSquared, enables construction of the $76 million Phase 1A investment to move forward.  

Two additional development sites, totaling about one acre, will remain along the State Street side of the Coliseum site after completion of Phase 1C.

The sites will be reserved for Phase 2 and leased to LWLP New Haven LLC for interim use until a development project is ready to move forward, according to the release.

The city is seeking additional funding for Downtown Crossing roadway infrastructure. The hope is to use it to develop the former North Frontage Road right-of-way into a bicycle and pedestrian greenway park, officials said.


Big mixed-use development proposed for former West Hartford UConn branch campus

By Michael Puffer

The buyers of the former University of Connecticut satellite campus in West Hartford have forwarded several possible design schemes for the 57-acre property, predominantly focusing on a mix of multifamily housing, retail, restaurants, medical office, research space and a neighborhood market.

Plans also call for walking trails and public park space. The development site is composed of two properties on opposite sides of the intersection of Trout Brook Drive and Asylum Avenue, 1700 and 1800 Asylum Ave. One already hosts several ball fields.

Five development options were shared with West Hartford’s Design Review Committee Thursday. Four mixed-use, with commercial development at 1800 Asylum Ave., the portion of the campus hosting academic buildings. Residential development would be clustered on the eastern side of Trout Brook Drive, 1700 Asylum Ave., a location currently occupied by parking lots and playing fields.

The “preferred” option shows seven large residential buildings ranging from three to five stories, along with a clubhouse, at 1700 Asylum Ave. This option also includes residential development on 1800 Asylum Ave., with some mixed retail and residential buildings, townhouses and multifamily buildings. This version includes a laboratory/research building, organic market, parking structure and retail building.

The proposal has been forwarded by West Hartford 1 LLC, which is listed as the principal of the limited liability companies that paid $2.75 million for the properties in December. West Hartford 1 has been quiet about its backers, but it shares a West Hartford office with Dominion Realty Group, whose principal, Domenic Carpionato, is a senior vice president with Rhode Island real estate development company Carpionato Group. A spokesperson for West Hartford 1 confirmed Carpionato Group is not involved in the West Hartford development.

Government relations firm Sullivan & LeShane released a statement Thursday on behalf of West Hartford 1 LLC. 

“The people who live and work in this area have waited a long time for the empty UConn campus to re-emerge in a way that befits the size, scale and natural features of this property," reads a portion of the statement. “As we begin discussions and idea-sharing with the Town of West Hartford, we will also begin engaging with neighbors, residents and community organizations so we can ultimately shape and bring to the community a plan that is worthy of this neighborhood and contributes to West Hartford’s vitality.” 

The plans presented Thursday will be further refined and would ultimately require a zone change from the Town Council, according to Town Planner Todd Dumais. It is likely the council would be asked to approve a special development design district, a sort of overlay zone, permitting the development, Dumais said. That process would include input from the Design Review Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission. The properties are currently zoned for single-family development, Dumais said.

The development would also require an approval from the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission, Dumais said. 
West Hartford 1’s submission identified itself, Newman Architects, BL Companies and Alter & Pearson LLC. as members of the development team. 


Seeking fresh start for a failing section of town, East Hartford on verge of seizing rundown Silver Lane Plaza

Don Stacom

Complaining of decades of decay at the Silver Lane Plaza, a series of East Hartford residents on Friday praised town government’s progress toward acquiring the property through eminent domain.

If the town council endorses the idea Tuesday night, East Hartford might have control of the 20-acre property before the year ends, Mayor Mike Walsh said Friday.

A town panel voted unanimously Thursday night to pursue seizing the half-empty shopping center, and the reaction on social media was overwhelmingly positive the next day.

The town posted the vote on its municipal Facebook page, and more than 65 people added comments — nearly all praising the decision. Comments like “Finally!” “great news” and “Thank God, what an eyesore” appeared in the first few hours.

“What was important was to see the community come together and in a strong, uniform voice say they support this,” Walsh said of Thursday night’s meeting of the redevelopment agency.

Eminent domain allows the state or individual communities to take private property when there is a strong public interest being served. The government must be able to demonstrate that interest, and has to pay the owner a reasonable price in compensation.

It is a power that towns and cities rarely invoke. When they do, they’re usually targeting land needed to complete a local school, a road, a police station, firehouse, library or other core municipal service.

But under narrow conditions, state law also allows eminent domain to take a property that is severely neglected or blighted.

East Hartford officials have warned that two massive development plans very close by — one for more than 470 apartments, the other for two mega-warehouses and a medical research complex — could be jeopardized if the plaza isn’t either upgraded or torn down.

East Hartford has two appraisals for the Silver Lane Plaza that average out to about $4.5 million. The town received federal aid that will cover that expense, but has made no progress in negotiations with owner East Hartford Venture LLC.

Walsh’s administration has said for the past year that the owner has shown no interest in good faith talks, even though the town has advised it that upgrading the property is crucial to a redevelopment plan for the whole Silver Lane corridor.

Calling the plaza “an eyesore,” lifelong resident David Case told the agency that he and his family support Walsh’s plan to buy and demolish it. The town would then seek developers for residential or mixed-used development of the land.

“We’re the crossroads of New England. We want people to come here, shop here, live here. I want to see us grow,” Case said. “This is not just a plan to knock things down, it’s a plan to revitalize this town.”

Resident Eileen Driscoll agreed.

“That thing is ugly. It’s like a bad apple,” Driscoll said. “I’m not a big fan of eminent domain, but when it’s got to be done, it’s got to be done.”

Don Poland, a senior planner with the Goman+York consulting firm, said Thursday night that the town’s redevelopment plan for the Silver Lane corridor includes less retail and more multi-family housing and mixed-use development. The plan clearly cites the plaza as one of the three key properties that need remediation, he said.

In the past, the property manager for the Silver Lane Plaza has said the town is overstating the state of disrepair there. The company did not issue a comment about Thursday night’s decision.

Walsh emphasized that the town is committed to helping the small number of shops and service businesses at the plaza to relocate before construction.

“At the end of the day, these are East Hartford businesses and we value them very much,” Walsh said.


Eversource C.E.O. "deeply concerned" about region's winter power capacity

Grace Finerman   

MANCHESTER, N.H. —

New England may not have enough power if a severe cold spell hits this winter, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Eversource Energy warned in a letter to President Joe Biden.

“I write to you today to ask for your Administration’s leadership again to swiftly address the growing concerns about winter electric reliability in New England,” wrote Joseph R. Nolan, Jr.

“As both an energy company CEO and a lifelong New Englander, I am deeply concerned about the potentially severe impact a winter energy shortfall would have on the people and businesses of this region.”

Nolan called this a serious public health and safety threat.

He wrote that Eversource has ramped up investments in clean energy resources, but many of these projects won’t be bringing power to the grid for several years.

He added that both the region’s electricity grid operator and the federal Energy Regulatory Commission worry New England won’t have enough natural gas to meet power needs during a stretch of bitter cold weather.

He also mentioned the war in Ukraine, saying it has led to high electricity and gas costs as well as global price pressures.

“I respectfully urge you, Mr. President, to employ the emergency powers of the federal government to take all steps to ensure that adequate fuel resources will be available in the event of severe weather conditions in New England this winter,” Nolan wrote.

Nolan mentioned several emergency authorities the federal government has at its disposal, including the Federal Power Act, the Jones Act, the Natural Gas Policy Act, and the Defense Production Act as potential tools to help.

Nolan closed the letter by saying, “I know that you share my concern for the people and businesses of this great region. I ask your Administration to take all necessary measures without delay.”

WMUR reached out to the White House for a response to the letter, but we did not hear back on Friday.


Agreement approval moves forward plan to revitalize Waterbury

ALEXANDER MACDOUGAL

WATERBURY — The Board of Aldermen has approved an agreement between the city, Waterbury Development Corp. and environmental engineering firm Tighe & Bond, kicking off the investigation process for the city-owned 170 Freight St. property, part of a broader plan by the city to revitalize the downtown area.

The property is one of three neighboring addresses that the city, under Mayor Neil M. O’Leary, acquired with the intention of clearing out existing, corroding structures and then finding interested property developers. The other two properties are 130 Freight St., home of the former Anaconda Brass factory, and 000 West Main St.

With the agreement, Tighe & Bond now have 180 days to complete their initial investigation of the 170 Freight St. property. This will be followed by preparation for the demolition, then the actual demolition itself, and the subsequent cleanup, said Thomas Hyde, interim director of Waterbury Development Corp.

“Once they go in and investigate, it is likely that the property is going to have to be abated,” he said. “If the building is not structurally sound, then we have the ability to tear the building down and remove everything as polluted. If the building is structurally sound, you have to go in and remove those contaminants before you tear the building down, and it’s likely we’re going to have to do that.”

For all three properties to become ready for development, the timeline may be extended significantly longer, due to the Environmental Protection Agency considering the some of area a hazardous site under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, requiring the city to apply for a stewardship permit, a process which can take up to a year, Hyde said.

Funding for the project comes from a $200,000 grant the city received from the Connecticut Department of Economic Community Development (DECD), as well as money from the $10 million the city received from the state’s Community Investment Fund, spreading across all three sites.

“When we had the two sites originally, we got some DECD money for $130,000. Once we realized we were going to purchase the [170 Freight Street] building, we went out for another grant from DECD for $200,000, and then, at the same time, we went out for another grant from the CFI for all three sites,” Hyde said. “So there’s a lot of different funding sources for this project.”

The plan is part of the city’s Freight Street Redevelopment Strategy, first announced by the city in 2018 to revive economic activity in downtown Waterbury. The total cost for redevelopment is $68 million, with roughly $10 million being provided by the city and the remainder coming from state and federal funds, along with the American Rescue Plan Act and other funding sources.



October 28, 2022

CT Construction Digest Friday October 28, 2022

Committee backs $5.65M change order for Meriden sewage project

Michael Gagne

MERIDEN — The City Council’s finance committee this week voted to forward a change order requested by Meriden officials to increase the total of bond funds issued for the ongoing high flow storage tank project at the city’s Water Pollution Control Facility by another $5.65 million. The project is designed to prevent the flow of untreated sewage into the Quinnipiac River during storms.

If approved by the full council, the total bond funds appropriated toward various city capital projects would increase from just over $77.39 million to $83.04 million. 

In 2018, an administrative order from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found the city failed to fully comply with its wastewater discharge permit. During a four-year period prior to that order, the EPA identified eight incidents in which untreated wastewater discharged from the Harbor Brook Pump Station exceeded both federal and state limits.

The city subsequently issued a $50 million bond for a project to divert wastewater into two concrete digester tanks at the Evansville Avenue facility. Utility officials could then store untreated wastewater in those tanks during high rain storm events, instead of allowing that wastewater to combine with rainwater and overflow into the Quinnipiac River.

The project included the further removal of phosphorus from treated wastewater before it is subsequently discharged into the river. 

Details sought

Questions raised by city councilors and Mayor Kevin Scarpati during a public hearing sought details about project costs, the impact of inflation on those costs, along with the project’s timeline and whether it could potentially be deferred until after the rate of economic inflation has decreased. 

Richard Meskill, the public utilities director, explained the project includes the installation of some 1,800 feet of 18-inch pipe to the onsite storage tanks. 

Council Minority Leader Dan Brunet asked Meskill how the project’s costs would impact city sewer rates for city residents. 

Meskill said he did not have an estimate at that time. 

Scarpati sought further information about the project’s history and the phosphorus related upgrades. 

“I would like to see a clear outline of what took place previously, how much we’ve allocated, what’s being funded now, and what’s left, if anything,” Scarpati said. 

Finance Director Kevin McNabola explained that the project was originally approved at $49.6 million, with a balance of $1.9 million remaining. That remaining balance actually reduces the cost of the requested change order, which would have been around $7.5 million. 

McNabola said stricter state and federal mandates are driving the costs of the projects. 

Meskill explained further that the tank storage project had been requested by federal and state authorities in 2020. 

“DEEP and EPA saw we had tanks not being used… They saw an opportunity to solve the overflow issue by diverting that overflow,” Meskill said, noting that the diversion component of the project actually has nothing to do with phosphorus reduction. The city of Hartford, Meskill noted, has been tasked with undertaking a similarly extensive wastewater diversion project.

Risk of fines

During discussions, officials explained the city may risk future fines from DEEP and EPA if it continues to allow unpermitted discharges into the river. The city has also received assurances that state reimbursement will be available to offset the cost of the change order. The reimbursement could potentially cover $3.5 million. 

“We’ve gotten pretty hard assurances we will get that,” said City Manager Timothy Coon, who described the reimbursement as “the carrot from the state for us to go forward and do this.” 

“We could ignore it and run the risk of doing fines… or we can do this now while going through the process of building and installing the new phosphorus treatment plant,” Coon said. 

Deputy Mayor Michael Cardona asked officials when the city would find out about the funding reimbursement officials anticipate receiving. 

Meskill responded he did not know. He said the project itself would take about a year-and-a-half to complete. 

Extension or increase?

During the exchange that followed, Scarpati asked Meskill and McNabola about the potential to request an extension for when the project needs to be completed. The mayor also asked whether officials can confer with the state about potentially increasing the city’s reimbursement to 75%, over the anticipated 50% reimbursement. 

In response to Scarpati’s question about seeking an extension, Meskill said the carrot for the project “has always been the grant — how much grant money they could give us to make this happen.”

McNabola followed, “They’re looking for this to happen now.” 

Scarpati pressed given the fact the cost of the project had increased, “what’s the harm in asking for either an extension or an increase on the grant?” They’re tied directly to costs that are beyond our control. Factors outside of our control are causing an increase. Would they consider an increase, up to 75?” Scarpati said. “I don’t see the harm in asking.” 

The mayor further suggested a discussion happen during the time between the finance committee meeting and the next council meeting to determine what type of funding could be available to offset any potential increase in expenses for local ratepayers.


Mark Zaretsky

NEW HAVEN — Tweed New Haven Regional Airport won unanimous approval for a 203-space parking expansion following a four-hour public hearing, convincing the City Plan Commission of the need for more on-site parking despite the testimony of 17 neighbors opposed to the plan.

Tweed currently has 927 spaces among its three on-site parking lots. With this week's approval, it will have 1,130 spaces. 

What originally was an application for 507 additional spaces was reduced first to 237 spaces because of wetlands issues. That proposed number was reduced further this week to 203 spaces.

Bulk of the new spaces, 178 of them, will be in an extended area with "permeable," or porous, pavement, adjacent to what is now the most remote and least expensive of Tweed's three parking lots, according to the latest plans. It's located behind the terminal and the tarmac where Avelo Airlines parks its airplanes.

Another 25 spaces will be in the closest and more expensive of Tweed's two front lots, directly outside the terminal's front door.

An additional 34 spaces in the farther of the two front lots were removed from the application for expediency, because of the need to move a security fence in order to add them to the existing lot, a member of Tweed's development team, Raymond Paier, vice president of engineering for Westcott & Mapes, told the commission.

The team still must apply to move the security fence, he said.

Eleven proposed new spaces that would have required paving what currently are grassy areas also were removed from the closer-in front lot.

Approval by City Plan Commission members Ernest Pagan, Joshua Van Hoesen, Alder Adam Marchand, D-25, and Chairwoman Leslie Radcliffe came after a presentation by Tweed's development team and more than three hours of testimony from neighbors, seven of whom were allowed to testify for a second time.

At Marchand's suggestion, the site plan approval included a condition that the applicant provide documentation on a quarterly basis of its adherence to a regular schedule of maintenance of the permeable asphalt material used to pave the lot, which allows water to drain through it. 

"I heard and I appreciate" the testimony, Radcliffe said before the vote. But much of the testimony was unrelated to the actual parking expansion and comments were more about the airport itself, and "they are not within our purview,"  Radcliffe said.

Several speakers asked the commission to table the application until after a currently underway environmental assessment is complete. The EA is for a broader airport expansion plan that includes lengthening the runway from 5,600 feet to 6,635 feet and building a new, 74,000-square-foot terminal with 4 to 6 gates on the East Haven side of the airport.

Van Hoesen said that part of his perspective was that if Tweed "didn't have this parking," people would park on the streets in adjacent neighbors, and neighbors would continue to be "annoyed."

Radcliffe said she found herself weighing the need for more parking "with the desire to find alternatives to parking and encourage use of public transportation elsewhere in the city."

She said she recalled other cases, and one in particular, in which restaurants in the city wanted to increase their parking in order to increase their business, but were denied.

Marchand said the airport is not like other residences or business in the city.

"It's a business that generates a lot of trips. It's a different entity ... even than a big residential tower," he said.

One thing the city can do, however, is "to keep the press on Avports," Tweed's contract operator, "and push them to deepen those partnerships" with other transportation companies that can bring people to the airport, including ridesharing service such as Uber and Lyft.

Currently, only Lyft, taxicab companies and CT Transit and an occasional shuttle that Tweed runs from the Union Station garage can serve Tweed. The airport has been unable to agree to a contract that would allow Uber to serve the airport and the leading rideshare service cannot bring people directly to the airport.

CT Transit has a bus that can drop off passengers at Tweed if they ask. But it doesn't pick up passengers there unless they call in advance, Avports spokesman Andrew King told the commission.

Other members of the development team included attorney Joseph Williams of Shipman & Goodwin and Donald Tone, a traffic and parking expert from Sam Schwartz, a New York engineering, planning and consulting firm.

Williams said the team has tried "to be sensitive to the fact that Avports is managing an existing airport that is abutting a residential neighborhood" and also has tried "to be sensitive to that neighborhood." While the existing parking is not always full, "we expect demand to increase during the holiday season" and "it's very important that we get this into place before the holiday season," he said.

Nevertheless, "We view this as a temporary solution ... while we get ready to move the terminal and the parking over to" the East Haven side of the airport, Williams said.

Tone said part of the parking problem is that leisure travelers are parking at the airport for longer than originally anticipated. 

King and Tone said that adding more onsite parking actually results in less traffic through adjacent neighborhoods compared to passengers being dropped off — two trips versus four for passengers being dropped off by friends, relatives or ride-share services, he said. 

"Even though there are some people in the community who will always want to shut down the airport ... we have to act as stewards," said King. "Part of our responsibility is to reduce neighborhood traffic if at all possible."

In addition, "As an airport, we're not allowed to prohibit an airline from expanding," King said. "Airport customers are showing up by the hundreds and thousands ... and regardless of how much parking we have, they're going to keep showing up."

Neighbors weren't buying it, however.

"I must strenuously object to the characterization put forward by the representatives of Avports that this process ... has in any way been sensitive to the needs ... of the people who live in the neighborhood," said Gretl Gallicchio of Hyde Street in New Haven.

"The needs of that commercial airline must be weighed against the needs of that neighborhood," she said, pointing out that East Haven, in which roughly half of the airport is located, is an Environmental Justice Community.

"I would suggest that they should start by actually talking to the residents of the neighborhood. ... Talk to us before you draw up a plan and submit it," Galliccio said.

Galliccio and Susan Bryson of Branford's Short Beach section were among several speakers who asked the commission to table the application until the environmental assessment for broader airport expansion is complete and more information is available.

Bryson pointed out that the airport is located within a FEMA-designated flood zone and "it's an extremely sensitive ecological area." She suggested "that we can drop this extremely bad idea and create trains to Bradley, the airport with which this is now competing, which is owned by the state and paid for by the taxpayers." 

Patrick Rowland of Minor Road in East Haven, about 3,800 feet south of the runway, agreed, as did Lorena Venegas of East Haven, co-founder of the anti-airport expansion environmental and community group 10,000 Hawks.

"I implore you to do nothing until you've asked for an environmental impact study," Rowland said.

"I believe that the premise of the airport expansion is wrong all the way around," Rowland said, suggesting that "a non-comforming use should never be expanded."

Lighthouse Road resident Gloria Bellacicco also asked the commission to table it, saying any parking expansion "affects the wetlands, adds to more traffic and noise ... Tweed needs to revisit their original plan, which was to provide a shuttle," she said.

Morris Cove resident Gabriela Campos said the airport's "lack of planning" shouldn't inconvenience the city. She also asked the commission to table the matter and "wait for the federal process."

Townsend Avenue resident Lynne Bonnett said that "in terms of reducing traffic, the best way is shuttle. That's more preferable to everybody driving their car to the airport," she said.

Nelson Street resident Lisa Bassani said, "this is a neighborhood hugely impacted by flooding. The whole area is just a bowl ... that collects water. ... You have huge flooding issues in this community that are not ... going to stand up to the changes that we know are coming up."

Townsend Avenue resident Margaret Wheeler said, "I really feel that this is an environmental issue, putting parking in next to a the tidal wetlands.

"How often is (the permeable pavement) going to be cleaned?" she asked. "It needs to be vacuumed and power washed on a regular basis." 


Newington officials hear from staff about infrastructure needs and improvements

Erica Drzewiecki

NEWINGTON – Elected officials heard from town staff this week about infrastructure needs and improvements made around town.

Assistant Town Manager Joe Salamone, Acting Director of Facilities Management John Kubachka, Town Engineer Gary Fuerstenberg and Highways Superintendent Rob Hillman addressed the Newington Town Council at its regular meeting Tuesday night.

Two separate presentations covered recent and soon-to-come projects at town-owned facilities, schools and roadways.

A facilities assessment conducted by Owens Realty Services, Friar Architecture and TLB Architecture back in 2021 indicated over $20 million in repairs and upgrades needed to be made to town properties over the next few years. The report included 16 buildings with high-priority needs.

Under the guidance of Town Manager Keith Chapman these Capital Improvements are being addressed in terms of need and funding availability.

“I think it’s refreshing we’re looking at our facilities as a whole rather than waiting until something breaks,” Majority Leader Tim Manke said.

Fuerstenberg reviewed road resurfacing projects that had recently been completed, covering 32 roads or 7.2 miles of corridor. Improvements included ADA compliance, traffic signals, curbs, milling and paving and more.

“I really try to protect our infrastructure around town,” he told councilors. “There was no ADA parking at the community center, now we have four spots. We removed 29 slip, trip and fall hazards throughout town.”

Construction projects currently going on or about to begin in the near future include the realignment and improvements to the Robbins and Maple Hill Avenues corridor, funded by a $3.3 million grant. Changes coming to the Alumni Road and Cedar Street intersection include removing the gate on Alumni and eliminating left turns onto the road from Rt. 175.

“We’re also looking to do a total reconstruction of the Garfield Street parking lot,” Fuerstenberg said.

Councilor Mike Camillo praised staff for being “proactive not reactive” and Jim Donahue called Newington’s leaf pickup and snow removal systems “extraordinary.”



October 27, 2022

CT Construction Digest Thursday October 27, 2022

Construction Firm Acquires 198 Acres in Killingly; Warehouse Development Eyed

By Andrew Larson

Douglas Construction has purchased 198 acres off Route 6 at 605 Providence Pike and 200 Hubbard Hill Road in Killingly, after acquiring another large parcel in the town earlier this year. 

The two properties in the recent sale sold for $1.6 million, according to Ron Lyman, CEO of Westbrook-based Lyman Real Estate Brokerage & Development.

Lyman broker Carolyn Trotta represented the buyer and seller.

Douglas Construction has obtained a zoning change from Rural Development to Planned Commercial for the 177-acre property.

The company plans to develop the property, situated along the Interstate 395 corridor, for warehousing and distribution. 

The parcel at 200 Hubbard Hill Road is zoned for rural development. 

Douglas Construction also bought roughly 58 acres on Hartford Pike in March.

Douglas Construction was founded in 1957 and is based in Smithfield, R.I. The company has built projects in Rhode Island, Connecticut and Massachusetts, and other parts of the Northeast.


Lyme and Old Lyme residents will vote on $57 million schools’ project on Election Day

Carrie Czerwinski

Old Lyme—On Election Day, residents in Lyme and Old Lyme will be voting on an almost $58 million dollar school bonding project.

The referendum will ask residents to approve or reject a request for $57,550,000 in bonds, with a state reimbursement of $9,775,000, to renovate and update four schools in the consolidated school district, for a net cost to taxpayers of $47,775,000.

According to the Region 18 website, current enrollment in the consolidated school district is 1,300 students, and projections show that by 2031, that number will increase almost 30% to 1,673, requiring more space to accommodate the growing population of students.

If the bonding is approved, Mile Creek School, Lyme School, Lyme-Old Lyme Middle School and Center School, all renovated between 18 and 20 years ago, will receive updated heating, air conditioning, and ventilation systems.

At Mile Creek School, which was last renovated in 2002, nine new classrooms would be added, and all four schools would be brought into compliance with current building codes.

All schools are compliant with building codes from when they were last renovated, but, as Superintendent Ian Neviaser explained on Monday, codes have changed since 2002 when Lyme School and Mile Creek School were renovated, and 2004, when Center School was renovated.

“When these schools were done 20 years ago, it was unheard of to even have the doors locked. Since then we’ve added a lot of safety protocols-- safety adjustments-- to our schools. We obviously now have locked doors,” he said, explaining that current best practices are to have a clear line of sight from the person remotely unlocking the door to the front door.

Center School is the only one of the four schools that has a direct line of sight.

Additionally, fire suppression at Lyme School and Mile Creek would be improved, including potentially adding a sprinkler system at Mile Creek.

Neviaser stressed that the $57.5 million figure was a “not to exceed,” figure, meaning that costs could be lower. He stated that if school enrollment projections decrease, for example, fewer classrooms would be added to Mile Creek.

Additionally, cost savings may be realized if materials and labor costs remain the same or decrease. Almost $2.5 million of the estimate is budgeted for cost escalation, and a contingency fund of approximately $8 million is also included in the package.

Estimates prepared by the Old Lyme Finance Department and the Lyme Board of Finance , show a potential tax increase for property owners.

If town budgets remain the same, residents could see an average increase on their taxes over the next 25 years due to the school bonding. Old Lyme residents could see a $112.43 per year increase on their property taxes for every $70,000 of assessed value. In Lyme, that increase could be $87.71 per year per $70,000 in assessed value.

The numbers are estimated yearly averages over the term of repayment, which is still to be determined, but is typically between 20-25 years.

A presentation by Neviaser shows those estimates may not come to fruition as they do not include a $618,850 reduction in debt payments for other district projects, including the 2010 renovation of the high school, beginning in 2023-24.

The tax impact may also be lower if the full $57.5 million is not used. Neviaser said the tax estimates are highly dependent on numerous factors including how the bond is structured, interest rates, and the term of the bond, as well as town spending, property values and grand list revenue, and the fact the Board of Education budget is only part of each town’s budget.

If approved, construction on the project would begin in the fall of 2023, with Center School and Lyme School completed in mid-2024, Lyme-Old Lyme Middle School completed in mid-2025, and Mile Creek School tentatively completed in August 2025.

On Election Day, registered voters in Old Lyme will vote on the referendum at the Lyme-Old Lyme Middle School gymnasium, and Lyme voters will vote at the Lyme Town Hall from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m.

Taxpayers with more than $1,000 of property on the town’s grand list, who are not registered voters, can also vote in the referendum. Old Lyme property owners can vote at the Lyme-Old Lyme Middle School cafeteria, and Lyme taxpayers can vote at the Lyme library, both from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m.


Developer proposes housing and restaurants for former UConn property in West Hartford

Michael Walsh

WEST HARTFORD — The owners of the former University of Connecticut property have submitted preliminary plans that envision a mixed-use development, including multi-family housing, retail, restaurants and more.

The plans, submitted to the town's Design Review Advisory Committee by property owners West Hartford 1 LLC along with their associates, show an intent to build on both the 1700 Asylum Ave. and 1800 Asylum Ave. properties that are separated by Trout Brook Drive. The submission indicates the development team also includes Newman Architects, BL Companies and Alter & Pearson LLC.

Representatives for West Hartford 1 LLC declined to comment on the project Wednesday.

The property has been vacant since 2017 after UConn moved its West Hartford campus to downtown Hartford. The China-based company Ideanomics bought the property and previously had plans to build a technology village at the site. After those plans fell through, the company sold the property to West Hartford 1 LLC last December.

The preliminary plans submitted to the town by West Hartford 1 LLC mention building a combination of various uses on the property, including multi-family residential housing, townhouses, boutique retail, restaurants, medical office building, a research laboratory, an organic neighborhood market and public use town park areas with walking trails.

“They’re in the very early stages," Town Manager Rick Ledwith said. "They’ve got a couple of different designs they are considering."

The presentation by the development group — which will have its initial study session with the Design Review Advisory Committee on Thursday — shows there's just under 58 acres of land between the two properties.

The side east of Trout Brook Drive, which now consists of a parking lot and baseball fields, contains about 24 acres of land and is designated as a multi-family housing site. The west side of Trout Brook Drive — where UConn's former buildings are located — contains 33 acres of land. Developers plan to focus mostly on retail and other use buildings on that side with some residential buildings possibly in the mix, according to their submission. Both properties contain acres of wetlands.

The developers presented several options in their submission, with one being marked as their preferred option. That option proposes four five-story housing units, three four-story housing units and a clubhouse on the east side of Trout Brook Drive.

On the west side of Trout Brook Drive, the developers are proposing a variety of buildings with different uses, including an organic market, multiple townhouses, multiple three-story buildings that combine retail, housing and restaurants, a parking structure, a three-story research laboratory building and a three-story medical office. There would also be areas designated for the public to use as a town park.

Other proposed versions of the two properties show no residential housing on the west side and smaller residential offerings on the east side of Trout Brook Drive.

Ledwith said Thusday's meeting with the design board will be the first of many that will help formulate a final proposal.

“Right now we are interested in working with them and exploring their options and finding the best fit for the town," Ledwith said. "It’s early and we’ll work closely with them and [the Design Review Advisory Committee], so this will change I’m sure."

Quinnipiac University neighbors don't want campus zone change to planned development district

Chatwan Mongkol

HAMDEN — Neighbors are fine with Quinnipiac University’s new construction projects, but not under a planned development district, calling such a move an “overreach.”

Town residents for the first time Tuesday night had a chance to comment on the university's proposal for a PDD, a zoning tool the Planning and Zoning Commission recently passed to assist Quinnipiac's expansion and other future developments.

Quinnipiac is looking to rezone the entirety of its Mt. Carmel campus and some of its nearby properties to a PDD while planning to build a new residence hall and two academic buildings to form a “South Quad.”

While university affiliates supported the application, highlighting past town partnerships, positive effects the projects would bring to local businesses and benefits to the students, some town residents said the problem is with the PDD.

Hamden-based attorney John Parese said the PDD is too “radical” because Quinnipiac’s proposal can be completed through a normal zoning process, especially when the university’s five-year plan doesn’t identify any other project.

“I hope you’ll agree that the ventures proposed by this applicant are unnecessary, excessive and a profound overreach of the university,” he said during his 19-minute remark.

Parese pointed out the technicality and objectivity of how the PDD was written, including a part that states the commission “may” hold a public hearing on the final site development plan, instead of requiring it. 

In a nutshell, Parese said the zoning commission is considering letting Quinnipiac write its own standards and regulations through allowing the zone change — as developers can design beyond bulk-written zoning rules with a PDD.

“PDDs are intended to encourage economic growth by bringing new businesses into town, new developments or support the expansion of the existing businesses and industries,” Parese said. “Not to provide a flourishing, not-for-profit entity a license to create its own rules.”

Other residents who spoke against the PDD echoed the lack of certainty in the process.

“This is taking a gamble on the new regulations, in which we don’t have any idea what the pitfalls are,” said town resident Elaine Dove.

Calvin DeMarsilis, another resident, said the scope of the PDD “is just too vague,” and that allowing this would destroy the neighborhood, citing the maximum building height of proposed bulk standards between 35-60 feet.

“You got a 60-foot building in your backyard, how does that feel for residents who walk in the residential area?” he said.

Quinnipiac's current proposed PDD has a maximum height of 56 feet, according to a staff report.

Meanwhile, zoners themselves also previously had questioned the PDD process and the authority they would have down the line, though they were the ones who approved the new regulations. 

Bernard Pellegrino, an attorney representing Quinnipiac, said there are “misconceptions” around what the PDD is and he’s prepared for a “rebuttal” to address all zoning concerns in the next meeting set for on Nov. 15.

PDD regulations were passed in July, aiming to be “an alternative zoning approach” for developers who look for flexibility for projects or sites that are difficult. 

It allows them to build beyond rules and standards written in bulk for locations in mixed-use, urban zones and properties that are owned or operated by colleges and universities.

To execute a project under the PDD rules, it’s a multistep process. The site must be at least 4 acres — Quinnipiac’s proposed PDD is 223.19 acres.

A developer first must go before the PZC for a zone change petition and an initial development plan, with a required public hearing; Quinnipiac is in this process. 

If approved, it then has to submit a final detailed development plan to the commission for a review. In this stage, the commission may hold a public hearing if there is a significant change to the initially approved plan.

The Tuesday zoning meeting was heated as nearly 30 speakers formed a line to speak, with half in favor and half speaking out against the application — to the point a Quinnipiac administrator shouted “it’s been 17 minutes” during Parese’s 19-minute opposing remark.

“I mean, I listen to six hours of myth commercials from Quinnipiac, ‘that’s just great, that’s fantastic,’” DeMarsilis said. “And then when one of our people goes a little long, somebody from Quinnipiac busts and yells how long he’s been talking. This is absurd.”

The “myth commercials” DeMarsilis referred to were hours of the meeting on Sept. 27 Quinnipiac spent on presenting its plans — both the proposed PDD and the initial development plan for three new buildings.

Other concerns mentioned during the hearing were the potential environmental impact to Sleeping Giant State Park, safety and traffic. Residents spoke of the problems anecdotally, highlighting alleged accidents they have witnessed and alleged traffic violations on New Road and Mt. Carmel intersections. 

They believed the new projects would bring more traffic and worsen the problems.

A lieutenant from the Hamden Police Department, Quinnipiac Public Safety Chief Tony Reyes and acting Fire Chief Jeffrey Naples, who all spoke in support of the university, said the projects would provide safety for the students, as well as keep them on well-maintained facilities on campus, thus, reducing off-campus issues.

The university also submitted a traffic analysis from Bubaris Traffic Associates saying the additions would have “a minimal, insignificant” impact on existing traffic.

“Partnership is not about perfection,” Reyes said. “And I know that you’ll hear from people that have had difficult experiences as a by-product of our presence in Hamden. … It’s about being present, it’s about being accountable.”

He vowed the university would continue to be reachable and accountable regarding safety and off-campus housing concerns.

Joining the public in voicing support for the PDD and the new buildings was Mayor Lauren Garrett, who highlighted Quinnipiac’s involvement in town with scholarships for local youth, community events and volunteer work by students.

She said she has called Quinnipiac with complaints about student housing and other issues, and the university has been “incredibly responsive.”

“QU is the largest employer in Hamden,” Garrett said. “When people have jobs, they give in taxes. That’s pretty important.”

Representatives from both Hamden and Greater New Haven chambers of commerce said the university has been “immensely” beneficial to Hamden and regional businesses in attracting foot traffic to the area.

Quinnipiac faculty members, deans and students echoed the need for new academic spaces on campus because of how the university has grown. The university hasn’t built a standalone building since the 1990s.

Following concerns from zoners last month about the size of the PDD, the university has removed 10 properties off the map, reducing the size by 36.51 acres. 

Town officials also were concerned about involvement of local businesses and underrepresented minorities in the capital projects. Quinnipiac officials said the university has been committed to diversity in the hiring process, and it also depends on the contractors to build on the challenge.


Stamford schools looking at $742M price tag to replace and renovate school buildings

Ignacio Laguarda

STAMFORD — The plan to fix Stamford's school buildings will take 20 years and cost the city roughly $742 million.

Those were the figures presented by architectural firm SLAM Collaborative during a meeting of the school department's Long Term Facilities  Committee last week.

The numbers represent an increase from the total price tag of $540 million presented in February for a plan that previously called for a 12-year timeline.

But since then, there have been plenty of developments.

One of the biggest changes came in May when the state General Assembly passed a budgetary bill that included provisions to increase the reimbursement share Stamford receives for school construction projects. 

One provision granted an 80 percent state refund rate for a new Westhill High School. Another increased the state's contribution for school contributions to 60 percent for the next 25 years, much higher than the 20 percent rate the city received previously.

In all, the state is expected to fund about $766 million of the school department's 20-year plan.

“When we first created the master facilities plan, I want to remind you that we really didn’t understand what the funding source was going to be," Superintendent Tamu Lucero said during the meeting. 

She later added, "A lot has changed. Things have gotten a lot better."

But those two major shifts didn't dramatically decrease all of the projected costs of the district-wide facilities plan from February since officials had set an expected reimbursement rate of 95 percent for Westhill and an 80 percent refund for a new south Stamford school.

Another major influence on the projected price tag was the rise in the inflation rate this year. Kemp Morhardt, principal at SLAM, said the company increased the dollar amount in the February report by 20 percent to account for the current increase in prices.

Kemp said the plan was expanded from 12 years to 20 years to level out the yearly spending the city would have to dedicate to the project.

"Given inflation, the numbers were getting unmanageably high year over year," he said during the meeting.

Yearly city spending on the plan would fall under $50 million for the duration of the timeline, only eclipsing that amount in fiscal year 2034-35. Most of the years, the yearly spending won't top $40 million, data show.

The full plan calls for closing four schools — Dolan and Cloonan middle schools, Toquam Magnet Elementary School and KT Murphy Elementary School — while expanding Roxbury and Westover Magnet elementary schools into K-8 facilities, and building a new K-8 Hart Magnet Elementary School at the current location of Cloonan.

Murphy would close in 2028, followed by Toquam in 2030, Cloonan in 2033 and Dolan in 2035.

An additional K-8 school would be created in south Stamford, using the campus of Murphy for students in grades five through eight, and a building on Lockwood Avenue to house kindergarten through fourth grade.

The plan calls for improvements to all other school buildings, with major renovations planned for Turn of River Middle School and Stamford High School.

Sandy Dennies, Stamford's director of administration, said the Stamford Board of Education would meet with the Board of Finance on Nov. 2 to go over the city bonding detailed in the master plan.

"There's a lot to consider, but I think that moving out the project to a 20-year project and looking at the bonding requirements that Kemp has put together, I think this is a very doable plan," she said.


Taco Bell, new hotel coming to Frontage Road in East Haven

Austin Mirmina

EAST HAVEN —  Folks looking for a bite or a room for the night will have some more options in town, after the Planning and Zoning Commission approved plans for two new businesses less than two miles apart on Frontage Road.

An application for a 2,100-square-foot Taco Bell restaurant was approved by the PZC in June. The Mexican-inspired fast food chain will occupy a vacant, one-story building at 95 Frontage Road, the site of a former car wash, property records show.

Taco Bell will join Wendy's and Dunkin' as the only fast-food eateries on Frontage Road.

The PZC also recently approved modified plans for a new, four-story, 17,713-square-foot hotel at 30 Frontage Road. 

The application, submitted by Berlin-based Darbar LLC, proposes to demolish the existing 70-room, two-story Quality Inn motel and replace it with a Home2 Suites by Hilton. The new hotel will have 33 additional guest rooms and a renovated swimming pool and parking lot, according to the plans.

Construction for the Taco Bell is expected to begin next month, Zoning Enforcement Officer Joseph Budrow said. Work on the hotel project will begin in 2023, with construction expected to take about one year, according to Gary Desai of Darbar LLC.

Economic Development Commission Chairwoman Lorrie Maiorano said the new hotel would be a "face lift" for the 50-year-old motel property.

Located a short distance from New Haven and Tweed New Haven Regional Airport, the proposed hotel also would be a valuable revenue source for the town, Maiorano added.

"It’s a hop, skip, and a jump away from New Haven, so it's going to be a great opportunity for folks who need a stay when potentially a lot of other places around are full," Maiorano said. 

The PZC originally approved plans for a 107-room hotel at the same location in January 2020, but the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic halted the project, according to the commission's meeting minutes. The PZC recently put the project back into motion when it approved a new prototype for the hotel building with four fewer guest rooms, among other changes.

Home2 Suites by Hilton is an all-suite, extended-stay hotel featuring stylish accommodations and flexible guest room designs, the company wrote in a news release. Launched in 2011, Home2 Suites is one of the fastest growing brands in Hilton’s history, achieving its 500th hotel opening last year, according to the release.

The addition of a more modern hotel in the heart of a busy commercial district on Frontage Road will be "great for that area," Mayor Joseph Carfora said.

"Anything for improvement on Frontage Road or anywhere in town, we’re in favor of it," he added.




October 25, 2022

CT Construction Digest Tuesday October 25, 2022

CRDA in serious talks with global sports, entertainment company on multimillion-dollar XL Center investment

Michael Puffer

The XL Center in downtown Hartford is nearing 50 years old, and is in need of significant upgrades, officials said, to compete for entertainment acts.

The Capital Region Development Authority is angling for a deal with a Los Angeles-based international sports and entertainment company that could invest tens of millions of dollars into the aging XL Center in downtown Hartford.

CRDA Executive Director Michael Freimuth recently told his board — which oversees the XL Center on behalf of the city of Hartford — that Oak View Group (OVG) is interested in a deal that could see the company putting much of its own funding into the XL Center.

That interest is predicated on a recent study that confirmed the ability to make desired upgrades to staging and loading facilities at the roughly 47-year-old arena, which is home to UConn men’s and women’s basketball and hockey — as well as other entertainment events — and is still seen by many as a key economic development tool for the city.

“We figured out how to resolve the physical issues that were critical to OVG’s business model,” Freimuth said in a recent interview. “We would like them to invest in the building. We’ll do the elevators and escalators and we will give them operational rights to run the building for a longer period of time — try to share with them the upside and minimize our downside.”

CRDA and OVG are exploring a potential agreement that could put the XL Center under OVG’s management for an extended period, and which would govern the split of revenues, expenses, liabilities and future costs.

OVG already manages the XL Center on behalf of the CRDA. OVG took over management following its November 2021 acquisition of Spectra, a venue management and hospitality company.

At the time of the deal, Spectra was nearing the end of a multiyear XL Center contract. That contract with OVG has been extended to 2025 due to the venue’s prolonged shutdown during the COVID-19 pandemic, Freimuth said.

Freimuth said he believes OVG might provide $20 million to $30 million for upgrades directly impacting customer experience. That would offset part of a $100 million program of repairs and upgrades currently envisioned for the roughly 15,500-seat venue.

A rendering showing a sports betting lounge now under construction.
Pared down rehab
State and local officials have sought a path forward for the deteriorating and outdated XL Center for the better part of a decade.

The CRDA board had, in 2018, signed onto a $250 million overhaul recommended by consultants. But state lawmakers balked at the price tag, sending the economic development agency and its consultant — SCI Architects — back to the drawing board.

That resulted in a pared back plan focused on upgrades to the “lower bowl” portion of the XL, improving staging, adding premium seating close to the stage, and other upgrades.

Planned improvements include a series of retractable walls that could close off some of XL’s seating, shrinking capacity to 11,500. That would allow the arena to meet modern standards for the ratio of bathrooms and concession stands to seats, improving XL Center’s odds of pulling in more acts, Freimuth said.

The walls could be pushed back for larger events requiring more seating.

Extensive improvements to IT infrastructure and the show-equipment loading area are also planned.

“We are leaving a lot of money on the table because we don’t have the right product,” Freimuth said.

“That’s where the $100 million project comes in.”

Those funds need confirmation from the state Bond Commission. Before that happens, CRDA and state officials hope to secure private money to close the gap between taxpayer funding and the $100 million renovation plan.

David Lehman, commissioner of the state Department of Economic and Community Development, said he is following the negotiations.

He acknowledged the partnership with OVG is not yet certain.

“We think if we can achieve this, this is the best outcome for the building,” Lehman said. “You are going to have an operator who is going to have more skin in the game and is going to be focused on more activity, more events in the XL. …

You are just going to have a lot more going on at the center if we have an operator that knows how to bring in concerts, that knows how to bring in shows.”

Revitalization efforts
The state is already spending significant funds on XL Center maintenance before it dives into the $100 million plan.

CRDA has tapped $40 million approved for the XL Center in 2017 to cover the costs of $15 million in ongoing repairs and upgrades —including construction of a highly-anticipated sports bar/sports betting lounge on the edge of the building overlooking Ann Uccello Street.

Providence-based Dimeo Construction is building the lounge under a contract that includes improvements to the building’s western concourse, construction of additional restrooms, commercial kitchen improvements and upgrades to other systems. The sports betting facility was originally targeted to open this fall, but its debut has been pushed back to the spring due to supply chain issues.

The XL Center currently runs at a roughly $2 million annual deficit, requiring a taxpayer subsidy for operations. Boosters say that cost is more than made up for by sales taxes paid by event attendees.

House Speaker Matt Ritter (D-Hartford) said the venue packs restaurants and hotels during sporting events and performances.

With 21% of the city’s labor force now working remotely, that’s a draw Hartford cannot afford to lose, he said.

Ritter said he agrees a public-private partnership is the best route to a grander renovation that will keep the arena operational and relevant for the long term. He sees it as a necessary element in the revitalization of Hartford, a broader effort that has, over the past decade, included the addition of thousands of market-rate apartments downtown.

“There are some people who say knock it down,” Ritter said of the XL Center. “That’s just the Connecticut mentality I think we have to get over: ‘Oh we are just Connecticut and who cares.’ If you had asked people 15 years ago if we could build over 2,000 units (of downtown housing) and they would be 85% to 90% occupied, the naysayers would have said that’s absurd.”


Once industrial wastelands, CT’s riverfronts increasingly seen as major economic development opportunities

Michael Puffer

As a child growing up in Torrington in the 1960s, Elinor Carbone’s mother would warn her not to play in the Naugatuck River because of the waste pumped into it by area factories.

“And she would know when we were in the river, because our white sneakers would come back orange or purple or whatever shade of contaminant was being dumped,” Carbone recalled.

Now Torrington’s mayor, Carbone is responsible for charting a new course for a city where large factories have long since shuttered, taking with them many jobs, and leaving behind enormous crumbling buildings and polluted soils requiring expensive cleanups.

Sign up for Enews

Carbone was back near the banks of the Naugatuck River on Oct. 6, this time in the company of Gov. Ned Lamont and other dignitaries, celebrating the opening of a 60-unit apartment building on a riverside site that hosted the Torrington Manufacturing Co. for more than a century.

“It certainly meant a lot for me to now have this (new apartment development), which is almost exactly in the footprint of a former industry that existed here, with this beautiful view of the river,” Carbone said. “There is a bald eagle now flying in this patch of the river. Heron and geese, … I see the restoration and reclamation coming to fruition.”

Once used as open sewers for manufacturing spoils and human waste, Connecticut’s long-abused rivers have recovered much of their past allure following stricter environmental laws passed in the 1960s and 1970s, accompanied by the retreat of large-scale manufacturing from riverbanks.

As rivers have recovered, efforts to capitalize on their natural draw have also picked up steam through new recreational parks, trails and commercial development.

Last year Riverfront Recapture announced plans to transform 60 acres along the Hartford-Windsor line into parkland, with docks and kayak launches, along with 10 acres for complimentary commercial development. Planning efforts are still underway, but the 40-year-old, Hartford-based nonprofit is eyeing multifamily housing and a restaurant, maybe a brew pub.

In April, Goodwin University was awarded a $2 million state grant to help pay for construction of a 32-slip marina on the Connecticut River, part of a broader plan to spark new housing and commercial development around the riverside campus in East Hartford. Goodwin officials hope to see an approximately 150-room hotel developed just above the marina, along with student housing.

The city of Middletown, in July, unveiled an ambitious plan to transform 220 acres of dormant industrial land along the Connecticut River into attractive and educational parks, community spaces, restaurants, retail and multifamily housing. In September, a newly-formed state board tentatively approved a $12 million grant to further that vision.

In early October, Middletown picked Spectra Construction & Development to redevelop three downtown parking lots. Spectra’s plans call for a manicured public plaza over a 584-space parking garage, flanked by 19 townhouses, buildings with 258 apartment units and 38,000 square feet of retail space.

Current plans call for the eventual construction of a pedestrian bridge from the plaza over Route 9, into nearby Harbor Park on the river’s edge.

Decades in the making

Connecticut cities and towns have advanced efforts to rebuild riverside properties for decades.

And during that time rivers have become increasingly more attractive as an amenity to leverage investment, said Donald Poland, managing director and senior vice president of urban planning at East Hartford real estate advisory firm Goman+York.

“Historically, prior to the rule changes in the 1970s, including the Clean Water Act, the asset of the river was a means of waste disposal,” Poland said. “Therefore, the river wasn’t attractive. It’s not a place you wanted to spend time. After the rule changes and the cleaning up of the rivers, they’ve changed as an asset. They are actually these beautiful, tranquil, picturesque environments that have an aesthetic and recreational value that attracts us to them.”

Many advocates of riverside development decry highways that run along riverbanks, cutting the resource off from residents. Route 91 in Hartford and Route 9 in Middletown are often cited as culprits. Poland notes that, at least in Hartford’s case, the city “turned its back” on the river a long time before the interstate was built in the late 1950s.

Hartford’s declining port trade “collapsed” in the 1840s with the arrival of trains, Poland said. The river was cut off from the city by a flood-control system of dikes in the 1940s.

Getting on the river

The nonprofit Riverfront Recapture Inc. launched in 1981 with backing from corporate Hartford and a mission to reunite the city with its river. The hope was to promote it as a resource for both the Capital city and neighboring East Hartford.

Today, the organization maintains three parks on the west bank of the river, one on the east, and 11.6 miles of riverside trail — with more under development.

The nonprofit organizes rowing competitions, walking tours, a music festival and other events to magnify the draw of its parks. Riverfront Recapture said its parks hosted 744,256 visitors in 2021.

Those visitors stop for gas, visit restaurants and other amenities, pumping $2 for every $1 spent on Riverfront Recapture’s activities, said Michael Zaleski, the nonprofit’s president and CEO, citing a 2015 study by the state Department of Economic and Community Development.

“We have this majestic river, this 410-mile river that starts in Canada and ends in Long Island Sound,” Zaleski said on Oct. 9, during a short break on the first night of a three-day music festival. “Here in Hartford, in the Greater Hartford region, we have this wonderful section we are trying to enhance. And, ultimately, we see Riverfront Recapture as an economic development organization.”

The Hartbeat Music Festival was staged at the Mortensen Riverfront Plaza, a signature park with landscaped decking over Interstate 91 and steep stairs leading to the river’s edge.

Zaleski said his organization, its parks and events are “an important piece of the pie” when it comes to the quality of life in the region.

“So, when a corporation is looking at recruiting people, there are people who are looking for riverwalk trails, there are people looking for rowing programs, there are people looking for opportunities to get onto the water,” Zaleski said.

Water attraction

Human attraction to rivers goes back a long way. The earliest civilizations sprang up alongside rivers, which provided water, transportation and seasonal floods that irrigated and fertilized agriculture.

There were also practical reasons Connecticut’s earliest communities have their roots near rivers. Hartford was a major shipping port for agricultural goods from the surrounding region before the advent of railroads.

Middletown also had its roots in shipping. The Naugatuck River and its tributaries provided mechanical power and water for a metal-working industry that would evolve and grow.

In many of Connecticut’s urban centers, past industrial use of riverside properties means that no matter how attractive the waterway has become, redevelopment won’t happen without help from the state and federal government.

The Torrington development celebrated by Mayor Carbone could only happen after a $2.7 million state- and federally-funded cleanup that drew out PCB-contaminated soil as deep as 17 feet.

In Middletown, the city has spent more than $75 million decommissioning its sewage treatment plant, buying properties and repairing a shuttered riverside restaurant building as part of its “Return to the Riverbend” plan.

The state’s new Community Investment Fund board has agreed to allocate $12 million to Middletown’s riverfront redevelopment efforts. It was the largest single grant among 26 recently approved by the lawmaker-led board.

But Middletown had asked for $24 million. Its grant application acknowledges the broader development plan “will take decades and hundreds of millions of dollars to complete.”

Still worth it

Despite the expense, there is no shortage of riverside redevelopment projects being pursued. Boosters often pitch these as a means to reinvigorate economies damaged by industrial decline while clearing away polluted eyesores.

In Middletown, the payoff is seen as an improved quality of life and a stronger attraction for both day-tripping tourists and potential new employers.

“Anytime we have something where people want to come and spend time, they are going to spend time in other places in our community,” said Bobbye Knoll Peterson, Middletown’s acting director of economic and community development. “If people are making use of the (riverfront parks) they are going to make use of other things in the community. They are going to go to our restaurants, they are going to grab that ice cream by the river, they are going to see an adorable shop like Amato’s (Toy and Hobby) and pop in.”

Middletown’s state grant application offered a “conservative” estimate of $300 million in private commercial and residential development accompanying its project.

Spectra, working as a general contractor, is already refinishing a building on Middletown’s Main Street into 16 apartments for another developer. Spectra President Daniel Klaynberg said that is how he learned of the city’s search for a development partner on three lots near Route 9 and Harbor Park.

Under a tentative agreement with the city, Middletown would share the estimated $35 million cost to build the new parking and plaza, Klaynberg said. Housing would be added in a second phase to follow in “a few years,” Klaynberg said, at an estimated $100 million to $120 million development cost.

Klaynberg said Spectra would have targeted Middletown for development with or without the ambitious riverfront plans. The city has a vibrant downtown and strong housing market. But the riverfront plan does add to the appeal, he said.

“I think this makes it a prime location for sure and it’s a super unique location,” Klaynberg said. “We are looking at housing. It seems like there is a market to serve.”


Zone changes limit scope of possible warehouse on Wallingford site

Kate Ramunni

WALLINGFORD — Recently approved modifications to the zoning regulations of the former Bristol-Myers Squibb property at 5 Research Parkway would likely preclude Amazon from moving to the site despite two previous tries.

"It's not an easy site because of how big the site is," Town Planner Kevin Pagini said. "We really wanted to reduce the traffic and the amount of parking-intensive uses. There is a pretty substantial buffer between the property and the nearest neighbors. But it may not be the perfect project that everyone is happy with."

The newest application for the property was on the Planning and Zoning Commission's October agenda, but an hour before the meeting was to start, three commission members notified town officials they would not be able to attend, Pagini said. The applicant, Calare Properties, opted to pull the application and instead present its plans at the November meeting, Pagini said, so they wouldn't have to do it twice.

The two prior applications prompted concerns from residents living in the area, but it may not be the same for this application, Pagini said, because of changes made to the zoning regulations since then.

"I understand their concerns with traffic and everything else," he said. "That's why we looked for uses that did not generate a lot of traffic. Some of their concerns are more the type of traffic rather than the total traffic. It's understandable, but just the size of anything that could go on that site I think would potentially be an issue. Some of the neighbors are understanding because they had the opportunity to speak on the regulation changes, but I think some of the commissioners felt like warehousing was something that would be OK in that zone as long as it was just warehousing and not anything else more intensive than that.

“They specifically prohibited Amazon-type uses and freight terminals and drop yards with trucks coming in and out transferring the goods constantly. They didn't want anything of that nature,” Pagini said.

Bristol-Myers Squibb left the site in 2018, and since then there have been two applications for the property for Amazon warehouse facilities. Both drew considerable opposition, and while the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission approved both applications, the Planning and Zoning Commission denied both. After denying the second application, the zoning commission approved a moratorium on warehouse applications for the site while it worked on revising its regulations, which was completed in April.

"We spoke with town engineers, the water and sewer division, and we consulted with every town department for months and months and months over these regulation changes," Pagini said.

Tenant not identified 

In May, Calare filed its third application with the Inland Wetlands Commission, which approved it earlier this month. Inland Wetlands has to approve the application before it can go before the Planning and Zoning Commission, so it wasn't submitted to zoning until this month.

The plans call for the construction of a 450,000 square foot warehouse building located in the same spot where the Bristol-Myers Squibb building was, with 10,000 square feet used as office space. The building would be on about 11 acres of the 180-acre site. The end user hasn't yet been identified, Pagini said.

"The size of the buildings and the parking lots are substantially smaller with this application," Pagini said. The prior application "spurred regulations changes that we currently have now, and the current regulations are what allowed this application to go forward," he said. "There are parking maximums now, and we reduced building coverage by a lot. We took out certain uses, specifically Amazon-type uses, parcel sorting and retail distribution facilities." 

While they haven't said who the tenant would be, "they just want to get approvals for a shovel-ready warehouse," Pagini said. The revised regulations do not allow freight terminals or drop yards in the new district, he said. "There are certain uses that were part of the previous application that we did not want to see moving forward,"

No public hearing

As a result of the revisions, the application is for a site plan, which does not require a public hearing, unlike the prior applications. But that doesn't mean residents won't be able to have their say on the plans. 

The commission “generally allows comments related to the application for a site plan, though it's not a requirement," Pagini said. "Site plans just have to meet the regulations." 

So far there hasn't been much of a response from the public, unlike with the two other applications, Pagini said. That could be because they spoke at length at the hearings on the zoning revisions, he said.

"We haven't really heard from residents. They had eight months to comment on the regulation changes so they voiced their opinion then," he said. I don't know if they knew it would still allow something of this size, but it's not being reviewed like it was just a normal project. We spent hours upon hours upon hours reviewing this. There are extra landscaping requirements, there are extra stormwater management practices. There's a parking maximum now. The last application had like 1,700 parking spaces proposed. This one allows a maximum of about 530, so it's about a third of what was being proposed before." 

The application applies only to the property to be used for the building and parking, he said. To do anything else on the property would require a new application.


Ridgefield earns $3M state grant to connect to Redding's portion of Norwalk River Valley Trail.

Sandra Diamond Fox

RIDGEFIELD —  The state has approved a $3.06 million grant to fund a portion of the Norwalk River Valley Trail through Ridgefield. 

The trail is meant to encourage outdoor activities and would eventually run through four neighboring towns. If approved by the town, construction is expected to begin on this Ridgefield portion in the summer or early fall of 2023.

The state Department of Transportation committed the funding last week for the Ridgefield Ramble, a 1.6-mile section of the 4.3 miles planned for Ridgefield. 

"That's one step in the process. This is agreeing this is a good project and we will go ahead and fund it with this grant money," Ridgefield First Selectman Rudy Marconi said. "Eventually, there will be a walking, biking trail. That is the master plan. Right now, we're doing bits and pieces of it."

When built, the 30-mile trail is expected to span from Calf Pasture Beach in Norwalk, north through Wilton, Ridgefield, Redding and end at Rogers Park in Danbury.


Proposed mixed use zone could lead to Trumbull Center apartments

Amanda Cuda

TRUMBULL — For years, Trumbull has debated the future of the Trumbull Center.

A plan to renovate the shopping plaza, which now has multiple vacant storefronts, including one previously occupied by Starbucks, and another that formerly housed Porricelli’s Food Mart, has received support from many of the businesses that currently occupy Trumbull Center. But a majority of residents at last week's Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing spoke out against a proposed zone change that would allow mixed use property, including about 50 apartments, at the site.

"More apartments are the last thing we need," said Cindy Penkoff, vice chairman of the Trumbull Republican Town Committee. "I am for this, but it needs be a plan that works for everyone."

The hearing, which lasted roughly two hours, was on an amendment to a zoning regulation that would permit mixed-use developments on properties greater than five acres with road frontage and direct traffic access to both White Plains Road and Daniels Farm Road. If approved, the change, which first came before the commission in August, could pave the way for a long-discussed project to mix retail and apartments at Trumbull Center.

Last year, Attorney Ray Rizio, representing Trumbull Center LLC, came before the commission with a pre-application for a plan to remove two buildings — an old professional building, and the building that used to house Starbucks and other businesses — at 900 White Plains Road, which is part of the Trumbull Center corridor. These buildings would be replaced with the mixed use property, that would include about 50 apartments.

Most residents who spoke at Wednesday's hearing echoed Penkoff's fears about adding more apartments to town. 

Joe Pifko, another RTC member, implored the commission not to pass the zoning change. He said he was particularly concerned with the size of the potential development, which he said would be inconsistent with the character of downtown.

"I have a a serious problem with a five-story building in downtown Trumbull, where nothing is like that," he said. "It’s going to stand out like a sore thumb."

Throughout the hearing, Rizio and Commission Chair Fred Garrity clarified that what they were discussing wasn't the development itself, but the zoning change that could allow it.

"What we are looking for is a text amendment that allows us to go forward with the conversations people are asking for," Rizio said.

Before the public spoke, commission members were allowed to ask questions about the application for the amendment. Commissioner Tony D’Aquila asked questions for roughly an hour.

One of his requests was for Rizio to show a site conceptual site plan for what the mixed use development might look like. Though Rizio complied, Garrity pointed out that the hearing was about the amendment, not any actual project.

"What we’re talking about here is language to allow a development," Garrity said. At this point, Garrity said, the development itself is "pretend. It's a possibility."

The commission did not vote on the amendment Wednesday, but Garrity said it would likely be on next month's meeting agenda.