November 21, 2025

CT Construction Digest Friday November 21, 2025

No construction on major CT highways during Thanksgiving weekend except for emergencies, DOT says

Liz Hardaway

There is no planned construction on major highways in Connecticut during the Thanksgiving weekend, according to the state Department of Transportation. 

The state agency said there would be no inspection, maintenance or construction activities on major highways from 6 a.m. Wednesday, Nov. 26, to 6 a.m. Monday, Dec. 1. 

“Only work of an emergency nature will be considered,” according to the agency. 

Work on the Interstate 91, Interstate 691 and Route 15 interchange project in Meriden also will be halted during the holiday schedule, but will resume the morning of Dec. 1. Work will take place during weekdays from 6 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., and some closures are possible throughout the week, including weekends, at nighttime, according to the DOT. 

Other projects will begin on that day, including bridge repairs on Christian Lane over Route 9 north and south in Berlin. Repairs on bridge joints will also begin on Interstate 95 north and south, between exits 89 and 90 in the Groton and Mystic area, on Dec. 1, according to the DOT. 


CT DOT says I-84 ‘Flex Lane’ could ease Danbury traffic — here’s what worked in other states

Brianna Gurciullo

While rolling out plans to bring a “Flex Lane” to a 4-mile stretch of Interstate 84 in Danbury,  the Connecticut Department of Transportation has highlighted similar projects in three other states.

“Flex Lanes have already shown their success in states like Michigan, Wisconsin and Ohio, improving traffic flow, commute times and safety,” says a voiceover in a video released by the Connecticut DOT last month.

The video and a DOT website explain how such a lane between Exits 3 and 7 on I-84 would work: When traffic is heavy, cars — but no trucks — would be able to use the left-side shoulder as a travel lane. When traffic dies down, the lane would return to being a shoulder. Signs above the highway would tell drivers when the lane is open, closed or closing soon. 

The left-side shoulders in the eastbound and westbound directions would remain separated by a median. The shoulders probably would not be open as travel lanes at the same time. Instead, the eastbound lane would be open during evening rush hour, and the westbound lane would be open during morning rush hour. 

It would be the first system of its kind in the state. Construction is expected to begin in 2028 and wrap up in two to three years. 

DOT has said the Flex Lane and other roadway upgrades on I-84 will cost about $250 million, according to preliminary estimates, but the project is still under design.

We asked the DOTs in Michigan, Wisconsin and Ohio to tell us about their Flex Lanes — also known as dynamic part-time shoulders — and provide data about congestion and crashes. Here’s what they said.

Beltline in Wisconsin

Wisconsin’s first Flex Lane opened in 2022 on a section of U.S. 12/18, also known as the Madison Beltline. 

It’s “one of the most heavily used routes in (South Central) Wisconsin, with more than 120,000 vehicles per day along a 10-mile segment,” the Wisconsin DOT said. “While a comprehensive, long-term Beltline study is ongoing, it was imperative to develop an interim solution to address existing traffic issues.”

Similarly, the I-84 Flex Lane is a “breakout project” intended to ease congestion while planning continues for a series of future changes to the Connecticut highway

On the Madison Beltline, drivers are able to use the Flex Lane during rush hour, on holiday weekends, when large events take place or when maintenance work or an incident occurs that affects traffic. WisDOT’s Traffic Management Center uses cameras and sensors to monitor conditions on the highway and change electronic signage.

Data for the full year of 2024 shows that daily traffic volumes were up on the corridor compared with pre-COVID-19 pandemic numbers, but average travel times during peak hours were down by up to 40% and crashes were down by about 30%, WisDOT said.

Did Wisconsin run into any issues when implementing its Flex Lane? 

During the design phase, concerns emerged from first responders “about the ability to effectively and safely manage traffic and incidents using the Flex Lane,” WisDOT said, but workshops and tabletop exercises were held to address them. 

Sourcing materials amid supplier shortages and finishing testing for software and equipment before the lane opened were also challenges, the agency said. 

Flex Routes in Michigan

The Great Lakes State has two Flex Routes. The first, which extends 8.5 miles on U.S. 23, opened in 2017.

Michigan State University study, which was sponsored by Michigan’s DOT and published in 2021, found that maximum throughput increased, average peak travel times decreased and crashes decreased overall after the Flex Route began operating.

But the northbound and southbound lanes had different results.

In the southbound direction, crashes went down 34% overall and more than 50% during peak travel periods. 

“In contrast, total crashes were comparable in the northbound direction and actually increased by approximately 24% during the peak traffic periods,” according to the study.

The study attributed much of the increase to a spot where the northbound Flex lane ends and the number of lanes drops from three to two, creating a bottleneck. The state plans to extend the Flex Route to an interchange with another highway, which is expected to resolve the problem. 

A separate Flex Route on Interstate 96 opened earlier this year.

brochure for Michigan’s Flex Route system includes an answer to a question some Connecticut drivers may have: “Why not just add another lane?”

The brochure says a temporary extra lane is more cost effective.

“Employing flex route technology increases capacity within the existing infrastructure for less money,” it says.

Plus, experts say highway expansions may relieve congestion in the short term but eventually attract more traffic that clogs up the roadway once again. 

SmartLanes in Ohio

Ohio has two SmartLanes that work similarly to the Flex Lane that the Connecticut DOT has proposed for I-84.

The first SmartLane in the state — on an approximately 5-mile stretch of Interstate 670 eastbound from downtown Columbus to the John Glenn Columbus International Airport and Interstate 270 — opened in 2019, Ohio DOT press secretary Matt Bruning said.

“Before it opened, the trip from downtown Columbus to the I-270 outerbelt would range from 10 to 20 minutes on average,” Bruning said. “After it opened, it has been a consistent five- to six-minute trip.”

Crashes were also down, Bruning said. From 2015 through 2017, there were a total of 311 crashes in the corridor. From 2021 through 2023 —  a time period that excludes construction years — there were 114 crashes

Data for the state’s other SmartLane — on Interstate 275 westbound on Cincinnati’s north side — “is not nearly as robust” because it opened only a year-and-a-half ago, Bruning said. 

But the amount of time drivers spend delayed in traffic on the about 6-mile corridor has decreased, he said.

“We were averaging about 15,000 hours of delay (on a yearly basis) before COVID and had rebounded to about (10,000 to) 13,000 post-COVID,” Bruning said. “This year, we’re averaging about 4,600 delay hours, so it has really made a difference.”


Why was the UI power line upgrade in Bridgeport and Fairfield rejected? Regulators to explain

Brian Lockhart

The Connecticut Siting Council on Thursday voted to revisit United Illuminating's denied application for a transmission line upgrade through Fairfield and Bridgeport.

However, it appears a majority of the regulatory body is not intent on reconsidering that Oct. 16 decision, as the company has requested, but instead plans to address UI's repeated concerns that those who voted "no" failed to explain why. The group now has 90 days to act and make such additions.

“I am supporting to reopen it for the purpose of clearing up the record, but my vote has not changed," Siting Council member Quat Nguyen told his colleagues during the special meeting.

Lee Hoffman, the private attorney representing Bridgeport against UI's plan, had that same interpretation of Thursday's teleconference, as did another opponent, the neighboring town of Fairfield. 

"I believe, based on today's meeting, they're (Siting Council members) not changing the findings of fact, the conclusions of law or the decision document itself," Hoffman said in an interview. "The council is going to edit the opinion."

And Lisa Clair, Fairfield's communications director, in a statement wrote, "The Connecticut Siting Council voted to approve UI’s petition for reconsideration...for the limited purpose of adopting a new written opinion that conforms to their October decision denying the...project."

UI submitted its request for reconsideration Nov. 3. The Council then had 25 days to act. Its last regular gathering within that window occurred last Thursday, during which there was a discussion about whether to add UI's appeal to the agenda. The group utimately adjourned without taking up the company's request.

Then on Tuesday, the utility wrote the regulatory body urging it to convene a special meeting and reiterating that the Siting Council's failure to outline why the plan was rejected violates Connecticut law.

At times members' discussion Thursday got a bit muddled to the point some involved appeared unclear what they were voting on. An initial motion was made to deny UI's reconsideration request. That failed in a 4-to-3 vote.

“Therefore, the motion to deny is denied and the motion for reconsideration…is approved," announced Vice Chair John Morisette, who ran the teleconference.

Before the group adjourned, Morisette concluded, "At a future date, we will have an opportunity to review the documents…that will reflect a (project) denial vote and will have an opportunity to vote on those documents.”

Sarah Wall Fliotsos, UI's spokesperson, said afterward that the utility is eager to complete its transmission line project. The Bridgeport/Fairfield section is the last 8 miles of a 25-mile route, the rest of which has been finished or is under construction.

“The Siting Council’s failure to offer any explanation for their denial...on Oct. 16 is not aligned with Connecticut law. But worse, it left us with no path forward for rebuilding our 60-year-old transmission infrastructure," she said. "The stakes are high: to continue with delay after delay, as some state politicians have recklessly called for, risks a catastrophic transmission line failure that could result in a prolonged electric outage across the state and region, as well as tumultuous rail disruption."

If that October rejection stands, UI can either take the matter to court or submit a revised proposal that seeks to address council members' issues.

UI first submitted its monopole plan to the Siting Council in 2023. The company has maintained that installing the wires on tall poles routed along the southern side of the Metro-North Railroad train tracks is the best and least costly to ratepayers option for upgrading the aged equipment. 

But critics, including several elected leaders of those two municipalities, have opposed the plans, arguing the lines should instead be buried to avoid what they claim will be adverse impacts on economic development, the environment, and historic and religious properties.

In June, the council signaled it would turn down UI's transmission wire upgrade during an informal vote, but then in September reversed course in a second unofficial vote and backed the proposed overhaul, infuriating opponents. 

But then the group, after outcry from officials in Fairfield and Bridgeport who want the transmission wires buried, and at the urging of Gov. Ned Lamont, postponed a final September vote to Oct. 16 for the sides to try to seek a compromise that never materialized.

Then, during that October meeting, the regulatory body changed its opinion again and rejected UI's project in a final vote.


Connecticut officials announce up to $121 million in quantum-technology investments

Paul Schott

NEW HAVEN — Connecticut is committing up to $121 million to develop quantum technology, state officials and leaders of the University of Connecticut and Yale University announced Thursday — investments that they said could transform the state’s economy.

The new initiatives to bolster quantum technology, which is based on the principles of quantum mechanics, will be overseen by the nonprofit QuantumCT. The funds include $50 million to expand the state’s quantum infrastructure, which will complement a recently announced $10 million allocation for QuantumCT that is part of the state’s Innovation Clusters initiative. In addition, the state could provide an additional allotment of up to $60 million to support potential federal funding. 

“The time to prepare our state, to lay the groundwork for our future and to prepare our workforce is now,” Daniel O’Keefe, commissioner of the state Department of Economic and Community Development, said in a news conference at Kline Tower, part of the Science Hill section of Yale’s campus in New Haven. “And I believe Connecticut is uniquely positioned to lead. For over a century, Connecticut has led in advanced manufacturing and the application of advanced technologies.” 

QuantumCT is the result of a UConn-Yale partnership that was launched in response to the National Science Foundation’s Regional Innovation Engines program. A QuantumCT proposal is a finalist for grant funding through the RIE program, with winning proposals expected to be announced in the first quarter of next year. 

If the NSF selects QuantumCT’s plan, the endorsement would unlock up to $60 million in additional state funding. 

The centerpiece of QuantumCT's work is a planned incubator that would be located in a to-be-determined, off-campus location in New Haven. A news release about the new quantum funding describes it as a “first-of-its-kind facility” that will “combine co-working and lab space with engineering and materials characterization capabilities, quantum testbeds and onsite technical expertise.” 

“We have thought leadership, we have a really high density of early adopters, we have a right to win,” said QuantumCT CEO and President Albert M. Green. “So we’re about to get after it now.” 

In addition to the previously announced $10 million allocation for QuantumCT, New Haven has qualified for about $40 million in other Innovation Clusters funds to support life sciences and quantum projects. 

“If you look at what has happened with life sciences and biosciences, we're the second-largest hub in New England, we're ranked in the top 20 cities nationwide for NIH grants, and so New Haven is clearly, clearly on the map,” said New Haven Mayor Justin Elicker. “By putting in this investment, you're making it more likely that we are going to have a significant federal investment that is going to drive this trajectory.” 

UConn and Yale officials said that their universities are longtime quantum supporters, citing a number of large infrastructure investments that are separate from the new funding. They include the Science 1 building, which opened in 2023 on UConn’s main campus in Storrs, and Yale’s underway construction of several buildings, totaling more than 600,000 gross square feet, in its Upper Hill Science Development, that will support quantum-science engineering and materials. 

“We are so excited to be in partnership with UConn and other schools through the state, the private sector, local leaders, community partners and the state of Connecticut — all brought together in QuantumCT, a really historic partnership,” said Yale President Maurie McInnis. 

UConn President Radenka Maric said that, “Today, we celebrate the partnership between our state, our educational institutions and our companies that will advance supportive technologies to benefit our state.” 

O’Keefe said that he believed that quantum technology would have a massive impact on Connecticut’s economy. 

“If you look at our core industries, things like advanced manufacturing in support our national defense, things like cryptography, if you look at things like financial technology, if you look at insurance technologies, if you look at health care, biotech, the emergence of quantum will accelerate innovation in every single one of those industries,” O’Keefe said.  

Gov. Ned Lamont offered a similarly bullish outlook. 

“This is what we do in Connecticut,” said Lamont, whose Yale roots go back to the master of business administration that he earned in 1980 from the university's School of Management. “We’re not the cheapest, but we’re the best. A lot of that has to do with the incredible universities we have here, the amazing research and development. And you see that is what is evidenced today. And that’s why this is so important to your future and our future, and the future, I think, of this country.”  


CT rebuild of an I-95 bridge in Norwalk after fiery crash wins national award

Brianna Gurciullo

Connecticut officials have been able to boast that the state Department of Transportation and its contractor rebuilt a fire-damaged bridge over Interstate 95 five months earlier than expected and about $3 million under budget. 

And now, they can say the project is a national award winner.

A panel of industry experts picked the project — which involved tearing down and reconstructing the Fairfield Avenue overpass in Norwalk after a flatbed tractor-trailer, fuel truck and passenger car crashed in May 2024, resulting in a massive fire but no deaths — to receive the Grand Prize in an annual contest founded by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 

Norwalk's I-95 bridge fire

“The 2025 America’s Transportation Awards competition received the most state DOT nominations to date — highlighting this year’s most innovative transportation projects that bolster safety, boost the economy and improve the quality of life for everyone,” AASHTO Executive Director Jim Tymon said in a statement. 

The contest drew 113 nominations from 35 states this year, according to a news release from the group that represents transportation departments across the country. Connecticut’s DOT first won a regional award, then was up against 11 other projects for the Grand Prize, which comes with a $10,000 check.

The Connecticut DOT will donate the money to Connecticut Foodshare and a foundation created by the family of Andrew DiDomenico, a DOT employee who was killed by a drunk driver.

The compromised Fairfield Avenue bridge was demolished, and one of the busiest highways in the nation was fully reopened to traffic within days of the fiery 2024 collision.

It took seven months to build and open the new bridge at a cost of about $17 million. The project was funded by state bonding, with the expectation that the federal government would reimburse the state for about 90% of the expenses. 

Impact on Norwalk

Officials have attributed the speedy construction to good weather, dedication and an accelerated regulatory approval process. Yonkers Contracting Co. and nine subcontractors worked on the project. 

“This was an extraordinary effort under immense pressure and everyone delivered,” Gov. Ned Lamont said earlier this year, around the anniversary of the crash.

In a release this week, Connecticut DOT Commissioner Garrett Eucalitto said the project “from unexpected start to celebratory finish showed what can be accomplished when local, state and federal governments work together.”

Connecticut’s DOT also won AASHTO President’s Transportation Awards for its work with Massachusetts’ DOT on a program called Empathy at the Intersection, which “puts transportation professionals into customers’ shoes to experience and see the street through the eyes of vulnerable users and operators,” and for an agreement with the federal DOT to speed up reviews of transportation projects that could affect historic properties.


A $24M expansion of a major CT arts center is to start soon. A place “great ideas’ will come from.

Kenneth R. Gosselin

Think movie theaters, a cafe, performing arts, more space for educational programs and more.

After years of planning and fundraising, Real Art Ways — the contemporary arts center that has been a fixture in Hartford’s Parkville neighborhood for three decades — will begin construction in February on the largest expansion in its history, after raising nearly $7 million in individual and corporate donations.

Construction is expected to take about a year, with the expansion calling for a major addition that will increase the size of the arts venue by 50%. The project also includes the addition of three movie screens, bringing the organization’s total to four. The project also calls for a dedicated area for the performing arts, a new café and more space for educational programs.

RAW held an indoor ceremonial groundbreaking at its Arbor Street building. But when it came time for the actual groundbreaking, it was non-traditional as the arts organization itself.

“Your typical groundbreaking involves dirt,” Will K. Wilkins, RAW’s executive director, said. “We’re shoveling popcorn!”

Participants — including Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz, Speaker of the House Matt Ritter and Capital Region Development Authority executive director David S. Steuber — tossed the popped kernels into a wheelbarrow. They were cheered on by dozens of well-wishers, many of them donors to the project.

The expansion will crown a $24 million plan that also includes the $4.25 million purchase of 56 Arbor St in 2021. The nonprofit arts organization had leased space in the building — a former typewriter factory built in 1917 — for more than 30 years.

“When Will talked about this place, he didn’t talk about the gallery, he didn’t talk about an arts center, he talked about community,” Hartford Mayor Arunan Arulampalam said, during speeches prior to the popcorn shoveling. “That’s what Real Art Ways has built right here at 56 Arbor. Here in this space that’s going to be a café. Can you imagine the amount of incredible, great ideas that are going to come out of this café right here in Parkville?”

Arulampalam said it was certainly an unusual move to add movie screens in times when some movie theaters were closing. But RAW’s plan demonstrated its commitment to bringing independent films to the city and the surrounding area.

“It’s focused on the art and not the dollars,” Arulampalam said.

Eric Ort, RAW’s capital campaign director, said the arts organization still aims to raise another $1.7 million in donations for the project.

The state’s investment in the project also has been significant: $1 million for the purchase, another $3 million in 2022 for the expansion and $9.1 million from the state’s Community Investment Fund in 2023 for a total of $13.1 million.

Bysiewicz said it is critical to make investments in arts and cultural organizations.

“Art has the power to bring people together, especially at a moment in our state and our country when so many people are lonely,” Bysiewicz said. “Places like Real Art Ways bring people together and have the power to promote social connection and so much more.”

Ritter, a Hartford Democrat and co-chair of the CIF board, said organizations such as RAW are crucial to a combination of arts, culture, athletics and museums that will boost vibrancy in urban centers such as Hartford. And, Ritter said, an organization such as RAW can’t be recreated elsewhere.

CRDA is lending $4.5 million to the project is what is known as a “bridge loan” that will allow the project to move ahead and lock in costs. The bridge loan avoids waiting to assemble all the funding sources and risk construction cost inflation and loss of previously-approved grants that could expire.  The loan would bridge financing such as historic credits, federal funds and capital pledges that will come in within the next few years, according to CRDA.

The idea behind buying the 4-story, brick building was grounded in diversifying the sources of the nonprofit organization’s revenue to include rental income from tenants, many of whom have a focus of arts and creativity that dovetail with RAW. The overall budget also includes a new roof and elevator for the former factory.


DOTs hit pause on DBE goals to recertify firms

Joe Bousquin

The Department of Transportation’s new interim final rule for its Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program has spurred state DOTs to pause workforce contracting goals as they review certification status of approximately 41,000 firms nationally, lawyers say. 

While all participating firms must be recertified under the new rule, the process impacts women- and minority-owned businesses the most, according to attorneys, since they previously qualified automatically on the basis of sex or race, but no longer do.

DBE goals in existing contracts executed prior to Oct. 3 still apply and DBE firms who won work under prior rules can’t be removed from a contract just because the recertification process is taking place. Firms may also appeal a decision of decertification.  

Dive Insight:

On Oct. 3, DOT’s new interim final rule, which barred the use of sex or race as a basis for certification, became effective immediately and caused confusion for existing DBE firms that questioned whether they would suddenly be terminated from the program. Follow up guidance from DOT issued Oct. 24 made clear that wasn’t the case. 

However, it also emphasized that all participating firms, including those owned by women and minorities, would need to seek recertification and provide a personal narrative explaining what disadvantage owners had experienced in their businesses. That narrative cannot cite sex or race as a qualifying reason. Along with the personal narrative, owners must also submit a personal net worth statement, which was previously capped at $2.047 million.

In blog posts and interviews, attorneys spelled out how those changes are taking shape approximately six weeks into the process. The heaviest burden during recertification will fall on women- and minority-owned firms, according to attorneys Robyn St. Hilaire and Natalie Nicole Mark of law firm Offit Kurman. 

Female- and minority-owned businesses will feel the most immediate impact,” St. Hilaire and Mark wrote in a recent blog post. “Owners must now prepare a detailed personal narrative and financial disclosure demonstrating disadvantages based on lived experience not related to race or gender.”

While the DBE program runs nationally, state-level DOTs handle certification via unified certification programs for agencies across their jurisdiction. DOT’s interim final rule directed all UCPs to reevaluate the eligibility of all existing DBEs. As that process takes place, which DOT didn’t put a deadline on but directed to happen “as quickly as practicable,” DBE goals going forward are effectively negated, at least temporarily. 

“The DBE goals are being removed only until all existing DBEs are recertified without using the rebuttable presumption of social disadvantage,” Chris Slottee, an attorney at Schwabe in Anchorage, Alaska, told Construction Dive. 

Although that’s the case currently, firms should still seek recertification, since participation goals for disadvantaged businesses in federal contracts should eventually go back into effect. 

“The goals will come back into play on future contracts once this reevaluation process is complete,” attorney Jacqueline Unger, a partner at PilieroMazza in Washington, D.C., told Construction Dive. “Firms should get recertified so that they’ll be eligible to bid on that DBE work down the line.”

Several states have already taken steps to roll out the recertification process for their UCPs, according to St. Hilaire’s and Mark’s blog post. Attorneys recommended DBE reach out to their state’s UCP as soon as possible for guidance and to start the process. 

For many current DBE firms, the program represents the lifeblood of their business, and recertification could become an existential must, Danielle Dietrich, a partner at Potomac Law Group in D.C., told Construction Dive. 

“The DBE certification is the only way for many of them to compete against the larger, private-equity backed firms,” Dietrich said. “It’s absolutely worth the time and effort for them to put together the personal narrative and new personal net worth statement if it means more of a chance of keeping their business alive.”


November 19, 2025

CT Construction Digest Wednesday November 19, 2025

Climate activists protest gas expansion projects in Lamont’s office

Josie Reich and John Moritz

Around 30 activists in neon pink T-shirts gathered around Gov. Ned Lamont’s office on Monday afternoon, singing “This Little Light of Mine,” to protest his support for new methane gas construction in Connecticut.

The protest was organized by a new coalition calling themselves Don’t Destroy Our Future, a group organized for the sake of this protest by members of climate justice groups including Sunrise Movement Connecticut, Third Act and Interreligious Eco-Justice Network. 

Activists called for Lamont to deny permits for new projects expanding natural gas usage in Connecticut. They argued that these buildouts contradict the state’s goal of achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, a target Lamont signed into law earlier this year.

“Gov. Lamont has been clear that he wants to bring new energy resources into New England to increase our energy supply and lower costs for ratepayers,” said Rob Blanchard, a spokesperson for Lamont’s office. “We look forward to continuing the conversation with regional partners on how we can best achieve this goal, while protecting the state’s investment in renewable energy.”

Nine of the activists entered Lamont’s office and explained their demands to a Lamont staffer, who nodded and said he would pass their concerns along. In a planned political arrest, those nine activists then refused to leave the office and were peacefully escorted out by Capitol Police.

They were charged with obstruction of free passage, a misdemeanor, and released, according to Lt. Greg Wimble of the Capitol Police.

Claudia Allen, a 79 year-old Thompson resident, said she felt a generational responsibility to be arrested for the first time in her life, because she doesn’t have the same career considerations as young people.

“I really feel that my generation has to make the right decisions in order for [the younger] generation to have a livable future,” she said. “It’s really all about the young people for me.”

Most of the protesters were around her age. Two of the arrested protesters walked with canes, and one had been arrested protesting the Vietnam War.

Kate Donnelly, a former first selectman of Hampton, said she saw Lamont’s approval of natural gas projects as incompatible with his support for climate goals.

“When Gov. Lamont ran for office, he made a lot of promises about addressing climate, and he hasn’t kept them,” she said. “We’re here to say, Gov. Lamont, we need to secure our future for the planet and our children and future generations, and we want him to address these issues.”

Lamont, a Democrat, has long expressed an openness to natural gas as a means of keeping energy prices in check while reducing emissions from older, dirtier forms of power such as oil and coal.

In July, his administration gave tentative approval to a plan to expand the capacity of the existing Iroquois Pipeline by building a series of compressors capable of pumping an additional 125 million cubic feet of gas each day through the pipeline. The decision angered both environmental activists as well as local residents in Brookfield — the town where the compressors will be built — who have raised concerns about the pipeline’s proximity to a nearby middle school.

The Department of Energy and Environmental Protection has yet to issue a final permit for the Iroquois project, which is scheduled for an informational public hearing in January.

A spokesperson for the Iroquois Pipeline did not respond to a request for comment Monday.

During his state of the state address in January, Lamont urged lawmakers not to “rule out natural gas” as a way of addressing the state’s spiking energy costs, despite concerns about methane and other greenhouse gas emissions.

Connecticut, like most of its New England counterparts, relies on natural gas to produce the majority of its electricity. In addition, more than a third of the state’s homes are heated with natural gas during the winter.

“We bring in very inexpensive natural gas from Pennsylvania, but that pipeline is at capacity,” he said. “And we bring in [liquid natural gas] by foreign ships, which is more polluting and more expensive.”

Critics of natural gas, however, argue that the commodity is subject to volatile price swings that could undermine promises of long-term savings.

“His embrace of more gas is really unfortunate,” said Peter Millman, the director of People’s Action for Clean Energy, an environmental group. “I think that he and his advisors are underestimating what the future cost of gas prices will be.”

Millman was not in attendance at Monday’s protest.

The Lamont administration has also drawn criticism over a plan to invest $42 million in a new gas heating system to power a network of pipes that deliver heating and cooling to more than a dozen buildings in downtown Hartford, known as the Capitol Area System.

Advocates had pushed for lower-emission — and costlier — alternatives that would replace the aging gas-powered system with either all-electric boilers or an underground geothermal system.


Electric Boat buys old Sears store, final piece of Crystal Mall site

Luther Turmelle

General Dynamics Electric Boat has acquired the former Sears store at Waterford's Crystal Mall, the final portion of the mall that it did not already own.

The purchase price for the property was not immediately available, either from Electric Boat officials or municipal real estate records. Over a period from June to the end of October, the submarine maker spent $31.42 million dollars to by two other parts of the mall from it's owner, Great Neck N.Y.-based Namdar Realty Group.

But the former Sears store was owned by a limited liability company, 350 Hartford Turnpike LLC. that is affiliated New York City-based ACHS Management Corp. The limited company paid $2.78 million at an auction in the fall of 2023 for the10.62 acre property and 150,632 building that made up the former Sears property.

Mark Rayha, Electric Boat's president said owning the entire mall property "will facilitate Electric Boat’s ability to accelerate submarine production." The mall is located on Hartford Turnpike and is adjacent to Interstate 95.

“This is our third and final acquisition of property at this location, which will address the increasing demand signal for submarines by our nation," Rayha said.

Construction of the new corporate campus is expected to start sometime time next summer, allowing Electric Boat  maximize manufacturing space at the company's shipyard, located near the mouth of the Thames River in nearby Groton. Employees will start working at the site sometime in mid-2027.

The mall site is located about five miles  \from the manufacturing facility.

The acquisition of the Sears space comes a little more than three weeks after the defense contractor acquired virtually all of the mall it didn't own already. And that $25 million purchase was preceded by Electric Boat's acquisition of another vacant retail space, the former Macy's store at the mall in late June.

Electric Boat employs more than 24,000 people. Company officials said last month that between 4,000 and 5,000 people will work at the Waterford facility when process of converting the mall to officer space is complete.


Construction to begin on 57-unit apartment complex in Montville.

Sofia Acosta Silva

Montville — Construction is set to begin this week on Horizon View, a 57-unit, mixed-income apartment development on Route 32, after developers closed on financing and received their permits.

The developers of the $24 million project, Honeycomb Real Estate Partners, said work will begin immediately following Tuesday's closing. The building is expected to be finished in February 2027, with leasing beginning about three months prior.

"We've given our contractor the notice to proceed," said Lewis Brown, managing principal of Honeycomb. "We have our building permit in hand, and after tomorrow, you'll start seeing construction."

The four-story building will include 25 one-bedroom units and 32 two-bedroom apartments ranging in size from 690 to 960 square feet.

Developers said 80% of the units will be affordable to households earning 60% of the area median income or below. The remaining 20% will rent at market rate.

Brown said the apartments will remain affordable for 50 years, and utilities will be included in the rent.

The project is financed with a total of $10.1 million in loans through the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority and the state Department of Housing and a $11.6 million tax credit equity from the National Equity Fund, a nonprofit syndicator. Liberty Bank will serve as the construction lender. A nonprofit organization, New Neighborhoods Inc. of Stamford, will also be a partner in the project. Brown said the developer's contribution is $900,000.

Amenities include a community center with computers available for residents at no cost, a fitness room, conference room, mail and package area, a bike room, and free parking. The building will be fully electric and equipped with Energy Star appliances.

Units will feature granite countertops and other modern designs mirroring Honeycomb's recent developments in West Hartford and New Haven.

Brown said the company chose Montville because of strong support from local and state officials and the clear need for more housing near major job centers, including the nearby casinos.

"Montville has been underdeveloped with housing for so long," he said. "So I think this will benefit a lot of people, folks who work in town, but also at the casino."

He added that based on recent projects, he expects Horizon View to fill quickly, noting that their West Hartford and New Haven developments rented all units in 30 days and both now have waiting lists.

During Planning and Zoning Commission meetings, Brown said the project drew no opposition.

The 3.4-acre property at 2268-2284 Route 32 was previously occupied by older residential buildings that have since been demolished. Previous plans for commercial projects on the site including fast food restaurants never occurred.


If It Ain't Broke, Don't Fix It

Lucy Perry

This summer, OSHA proposed revising or removing existing safety standards that have a direct impact on transportation construction contractors.

Three such rules affecting road and bridge construction are among several the agency is presenting in efforts to either revise obsolete measures or scale back or withdraw certain long-standing obligations for businesses.

Offered the opportunity the construction industry responded with a resounding "don't fix it."

In fact, on July 1, OSHA published 25 proposed rules in the Federal Register, reported the Institute of WorkComp Professionals (IWCP).

A general duty clause, construction illumination standard and rules dictating medical evaluations for certain respirators would affect the construction industry.

Industry stakeholders, associations and employers had until Sept. 2, 2025, to submit feedback to OSHA. ARTBA believes that while safety is a top priority, "clear and practical rules are essential for effective compliance and consistent enforcement."

"ARTBA and the AGC [on] Oct. 31 expressed overall support while recommending refinement to ensure clarity," said the road builders association.

Citations at Heart of General Duties Clause

The General Duties clause cites employers where no current standard exists, said Kevin Ring, IWCP lead workers' compensation analyst.

The clause is "often used for heat-related, ergonomic and workplace violence citations," said Ring, who termed it one of the most notable proposals.

"This change would limit OSHA's ability to cite employers … for known hazards ‘inherent and inseparable from the core nature of a profession activity or performance.'"

ARTBA maintains this policy allows OSHA to cite employers for unsafe conditions even when no specific safety standard applies.

"The industry urges OSHA to extend proposed limits on this clause to roadway construction sites where workers can be exposed to hazards," said ARTBA.

The association gave as an example situations where reckless drivers are outside an employer's control. AGC's stand echoed ARTBA's.

"When there are no specific requirements at play, OSHA regulates clear and obvious hazards under the general duty clause," said AGC.

The association said the proposal seeks "to exclude known hazards that are inherent to the core nature of a profession under the general duty clause."

The proposal came out of a 2014 D.C. Circuit Court decision where OSHA relied on the clause to regulate SeaWorld practices. SeaWorld was exposing its trainers to the recognized hazard of close contact with orca whales.

It was argued that the clause does not authorize OSHA to regulate hazards from normal activities intrinsic to professional, athletic or entertainment occupations.

"There are many situations, highway work chief among them, in which construction employers are unable to eliminate all known hazards," said the AGC. "Our comment asked OSHA to include highway, bridge and street construction as an industry that would be impacted by the proposed rule."

Keep Job Sites Bright All Night

OSHA proposes rescinding the Construction Illumination Standards that require minimum lighting levels in construction areas. Those areas include corridors, ramps, shops and tunnels. AGC and the industry recommends keeping the standard as is.

Maintaining the rule's wording would ensure adequate visibility and safety during nighttime operations, said the association.

These requirements set the base level of light required for different areas around job sites, said AGC.

"OSHA reasoned that because citations for improper illumination were rare, they should be able to rescind this regulation without any impact to the industry."

In response, AGC partnered with ARTBA, asphalt paving and roofing associations to submit a comment in opposition to the proposed rescission.

"The key argument made on behalf of the industry is that proper lighting is foundational to safety and the prevention of slips, trips and falls, among other hazards," said AGC. "A rescission would create uncertainty that could make job sites less safe, an unacceptable result."

Easing Employers' Obligations On Respirators

The third proposal that would hit the transportation construction industry directly concerns medical evaluations for certain respirators.

To industry's concern, OSHA proposes eliminating medical evaluation requirements for workers using filtering facepieces or loose-fitting respirators.

"The industry supports greater flexibility but urges OSHA to retain the guidance as a non-mandatory best practice," said ARTBA.

AGC said currently respirator-wearing employees would need to complete a follow-up evaluation to determine whether the respirator could be worn safely.

"The proposed rule identifies two specific kinds of respirators for which such precautions may not be necessary," said the association.

Going further for the cause, AGC said it assembled a small coalition of trade associations to comment. While the groups agree with the removal of medical evaluations in certain circumstances, they also believe that such an evaluation remains a best practice.

"We ultimately recommend that such practices be noted deliberately in both the preamble of the final rule and in a new non-mandatory appendix."

Addressing David Keeling, OSHA assistant secretary of labor, the coalition wrote a letter asking that the respirator requirements be amended.

"The AGC, ARTBA, MCAA, NAPA and NRCA welcome the opportunity to submit comments in response to the OSHA notice of proposed rulemaking."

The coalition wrote "in measured support" of the proposal, saying while safety is a top priority, not every best practice needs to be required by regulation. While they do consider questionnaires and evaluations a best practice, based on member feedback, they maintain the best practice can be included in the appendix.

"This strategy would provide our members with guidance on whether a medical evaluation might be beneficial," said the groups.

At the same time, they added, it would provide flexibility in situations where the process may be unnecessary.

"In some instances, the use of respiratory protection may cause a physiological burden on the employee," they said.

The questionnaire and evaluation are best practices to identify underlying medical conditions that could result in adverse effects while wearing certain types of respiratory protection. They said this may include filtering facepiece respirators (FFR) and loose-fitting powered air-purifying respirators (PAPR).

The coalition suggested OSHA create and adopt a nonmandatory appendix, a guidance on OSHA medical evaluation for FF and PAP respirators.

In their response to OSHA, they also offered their suggested wording for the appendix.

"Respirator medical evaluations are designed to ensure employees required to wear respirators to protect against airborne contaminants are able to do so safely. The results of the respirator medical evaluation also help employers make informed decisions about which employees can use respirators under specific environmental conditions and physical demands.

"Some medical conditions may make it difficult for an employee to wear a

respirator at work. A respirator medical evaluation can help detect if wearing a respirator will aggravate or exacerbate any of these conditions. Employers who choose to administer respirator medical evaluations and facilitate consultation with a healthcare professional, may continue to follow the Appendix C to § 1910.134: OSHA Respirator Medical Evaluation Questionnaire (Mandatory)."

In closing its letter, the coalition said each association takes the safety of its members very seriously.

"As such, we evaluate any deregulatory proposal from OSHA with caution," it said. "In this instance, we support the proposed rule as it gives employers flexibility in cases where a medical evaluation is clearly not necessary."

However, the coalition said, it asks that OSHA designate evaluations as a best practice both in the preamble of the Final Rule, and in the appendix.

King of IWCP said that the rule exempts employers who are required to have workers use either FFRs or PAPRs from medical evaluation requirements. These proposals, King said, address duplicative regulations or aim to better align with the general respiratory protection standard.

"Generally, they remove prescriptive requirements, offer employers more flexibility, [and] permit the use of different respirator types," he said.

These proposals "remove or limit specific training obligations but increase the responsibility to ensure that appropriate respiratory protection is utilized."

The specific hazards addressed include 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane, 1,3-butadiene, carcinogens (4-nitrobiphenyl, etc.), acrylonitrile, asbestos and benzene.

Cadmium, coke oven emissions, cotton dust, ethylene oxide, formaldehyde, inorganic arsenic, lead, methylene chloride, methylenedianiline and vinyl chloride also are included.

OSHA Eyes Other Deregulatory Initiatives

OSHA is proposing other initiatives that address recording musculoskeletal disorders and occupational exposure to COVID in healthcare settings.

King said the musculoskeletal disorder recording proposal withdrew a previous proposal to add a column to the OSHA 300 log for recording disorders.

"However, withdrawal does not change any aspect of an employer's reporting obligations," he said. "The obligations to complete, retain or use the same criteria and definitions for occupational injury and illness records remains."

The COVID exposure proposal would remove the COVID emergency temporary standard and its associated recordkeeping and reporting provisions.

OSHA proposed a rule to remove its Safety Color Code for Marking Physical Hazards standards.

"These codes have historically helped ensure consistent visual warnings across industrial settings," said King. "But OSHA notes the hazards are addressed in the Specifications for Accident Prevention Signs and Tags standard."

OSHA published a final rule removing the requirement for its administrator to consult with the Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and Health. This rule no longer requires the consultation before OSHA issues or modifies construction standards.

"If finalized, the rules could alter the compliance landscape and trigger more regulations in states with robust occupational safety enforcement," said King. CEG


November 17, 2025

CT Construction Digest Monday November 17, 2025

Enfield Square Mall redevelopment plan could begin site work in the spring after major win

Joseph Villanova

ENFIELD — Site work on the planned $250 million overhaul of Enfield Square Mall could begin in the spring, after the developer secured a major town approval Thursday.

Nebraska-based Woodsonia Acquisitions hopes to bring "Enfield Marketplace" to the struggling mall property, proposing a combination of commercial space and 465 residential units with the potential to accommodate a hotel as well. 

Under current plans, the company would serve as a master developer of the project, seeking other developers for the various lots that will make up the project site but expecting to build and own the residential component itself.

The town's Planning and Zoning Commission approved unanimously Thursday night a zone change to help the project move forward, though Woodsonia and its eventual partners will need additional approvals to get a shovel in the ground.

Enfield Director of Planning Laurie Whitten said at a meeting Thursday night that Woodsonia has "a lot of steps to go," but the zone change is the first. Once the developer completes its planned subdivision of the property, site plans for individual users will come in "piecemeal," she said.

Mitch Hohlen, partner and Director of Development at Woodsonia, said Thursday night that the developer's infrastructure site work could being in March, and negotiations with existing mall tenants and new businesses are currently underway.

"A lot of these smaller users especially, they kind of need to see it before they're going to commit, but I would anticipate we have 12 to 18 months of site work where we have to demolish it, get utilities in, get access drives in," Hohlen said. "As soon as we're able to pull a new building permit with water going in, you'll see new users going vertical."

Plans to redevelop the Enfield Square Mall back to at least 2023, when the town was in contact with two prospective buyers for the property. Namdar Realty Group purchased the mall for $11.4 million in 2019, at a time where the departure of anchor stores caused foot traffic to decline.

Issues persisted at the mall, including one incident where Enfield threatened to close the mall over a faulty fire alarm and sprinkler system. Woodsonia was identified as the prospective buyer of the property in 2024, after which the company began to seek financing and regulatory approvals for its redevelopment plan.

Members of the PZC were previously displeased with Woodsonia's plans for the site during the zone change application process in part due to a mention of a maximum of 703 housing units, though the developer later clarified it had "no intention" of building that many.

The commission debated some points of the plan Thursday night but largely spoke in favor of the revisions, including clarifying which uses could go where and leaving the project open to potential hotels, offices, and mixed-use buildings.

PZC chairwoman Linda DeGray said Thursday that she found it valuable to see Woodsonia's previous developments at similar properties across the country.

"I think that will be helpful to the residents of Enfield, give them some assurance that this isn't going to be a big blank space," DeGray said.

The company gave a presentation Thursday night on some of its 20-plus "community-oriented" developments, including redevelopment of other malls formerly owned by Namdar. Those include Mall of the Bluffs in Council Bluffs, Indiana, which Hohlen described as Woodsonia's "first introduction to Namdar."

Hohlen said the $150 million project took a mall that was around 50% occupancy and "past its useful life" and turned it into a shopping center with major anchors that he felt was "a really successful development for the community."

Hohlen said Conestoga Marketplace, another Woodsonia redevelopment of a former Namdar mall in Grand Island, Nebraska, was "virtually identical to Enfield" in terms of vacancy, overall site layout, and community importance. The $250 million project includes a new-to-market Target, a major entertainment destination, a 150-room hotel, and 275 housing units that will begin construction in the spring.

"If I were trying to build the most credibility for Enfield, this is the project I'd point to," Hohlen said.

The PZC also debated whether to remove gas stations as a potential use but chose to leave it in after discussing how they fit into the business models for some grocery stores and clubs, like the Costco located just across the street from the project site.


Connecticut regulators pass on revisiting UI power line upgrades in Fairfield and Bridgeport

Brian Lockhart

The Connecticut Siting Council Thursday briefly weighed tackling United Illuminating's request to reconsider the regulatory body's October denial of the company's overhead power line upgrade through Fairfield and Bridgeport.

But after some confusing back and forth and consultation with their executive director and attorney, Melanie Bachman, members instead adjourned the teleconference, leaving action on UI's Nov. 3 appeal in doubt. It was the group's last regular meeting within the 25 day window it has to act. The deadline is Nov. 28.

In a statement Friday, UI spokesperson Sarah Wall Fliotsos called on the regulatory agency to now convene a special meeting before the deadline. She also pounced on what she saw as a general lack of organization on the council's part.

"Yesterday's botched discussion ... was symptomatic of the same dysfunction in this process since September," Fliotsos said.

September was the month the council, having in June signaled it would turn UI's transmission wire upgrade down during an informal vote, reversed course in a second unofficial vote and backed the proposed overhaul.

But then the group, in response to outcry from officials in Fairfield and Bridgeport who want the transmission wires buried, and at the urging of Gov. Ned Lamont, postponed a final September vote to Oct. 16 for the sides to try to seek a compromise.

Then, during that October meeting, the regulatory body changed its opinion again and rejected UI's project in a final vote.

The utility can try to challenge that decision in state superior court, but first filed the Nov. 3 request with the Siting Council for reconsideration. One of UI's main arguments is council members erred in not outlining their rationale for rejecting the line upgrade. Fliotsos reiterated that stance Friday.

"Because of the Siting Council's failure to explain their decision, UI has no clear path forward for rebuilding aged transmission infrastructure in Fairfield and Bridgeport, which the Siting Council itself acknowledges creates a clear reliability and safety threat to the state and region," she said. "This benefits no one. Not UI’s customers in Fairfield and Bridgeport, not the state or New England as a whole, and certainly not Connecticut policymakers."

On Thursday, one council member, Brian Golembiewski, appeared to try to address that criticism. At the very end of the meeting he made a motion to add the UI transmission line project to the day's agenda to allow "the council to look and correct its decision documents."

"I want to make it clear," Golembiewski continued, "that this is not, I guess, not a motion to add the UI reconsideration. This is to just bring ... the (UI transmission project) docket back on the agenda for our own council, I guess, discussions (for) whatever the council itself can get to as a vehicle for us to align our opinion with our vote."

"And not for the UI's motion for reconsideration," emphasized Vice Chair John Morisette, who ran Thursday's teleconference.

Golembiewski's request was seconded by Hall.

Bachman advised that the group cannot simply "resurrect" the UI transmission upgrade. If that docket were to be added to the agenda, then it is "incumbent" upon the Siting Council at that time to take up UI's request for reconsideration, she said.

"I guess, Attorney Bachman, you're saying the council can't at this point add our own council reconsideration of our decision?" Golembiewski responded.

"What I'm saying is we have a pending petition for reconsideration with a 25 day deadline for the council to take it up," Bachman explained. So, she continued, to reopen UI's Fairfield/Bridgeport power line upgrade request "necessarily includes taking up a petition for reconsideration that is pending under that docket."

"If we don't act within 25 days it's ... deemed denied," she specified. "It's on the table for disposition if this motion passes."

Golembiewski reiterated he did not want to bring forth the UI reconsideration appeal.

Hall asked if UI's request would be before she and her colleagues "in the near future."

"As Attorney Bachman stated, if it is not acted upon for 25 days it is deemed denied. Besides today, we do not have another scheduled meeting within the 25 days," said Morissette.

"Got it," said Hall, who then withdrew her second to the motion. Golembiewski withdrew his motion, and the meeting adjourned.

UI first submitted its plan to the Siting Council in 2023. The company has maintained that installing the wires on tall poles routed along the southern side of the Metro-North Railroad train tracks is the best and least-costly-to-ratepayers option for upgrading the aged equipment. The Bridgeport/Fairfield section is the last eight miles of a 25-mile-long project, the rest of which has been completed or is under construction.

But critics, including several elected leaders of those two municipalities, have opposed the plans, arguing that the lines should instead be buried to avoid what they claim will be adverse impacts on economic development, the environment, and historic and religious properties.


Seymour to move sewer pipes, helping Kinneytown Dam be removed

Christian Metzger

SEYMOUR — Two sewer siphons are likely to move so that the Kinneytown Dam can be removed.

It's the next step in a multi-decades long effort to remove the Kinneytown Dam, which has blocked 30 miles of critical fish habitat for 181 years. The dam was built in 1844 to power Anson Phelps' mills and Ansonia Copper & Brass, but has been unused since it was shut down in 2013.

The $11 million project will relocate two sewer siphons that cross under the Naugatuck River in the sediment layer. 

The siphons run along the west side of the river along Route 8 to connect with the Seymour Wastewater Treatment Facility, which is located next to the Kinneytown Dam. The siphons will be re-routed under South Main Street before connecting with the facility further up the river past the dam.

Three options to rolocate the siphons will be presented at 6 p.m. on Nov. 17 at Seymour town hall so the public can give feedback before the option is selected in early December.

The current plan put forward by Naugatuck Valley Council of Governments would create 18 new bore holes that would stretch from the Southwood Apartments up along South Main Street before moving up along the length of the train track. It's expected to affect traffic, but the preliminary plans don't say for how long.

The project is entirely funded by the NVCOG with grant funding from state and federal sources, coming at no cost to the town. 

Hartford-based engineering consultants CDM Smith will design and install the new siphons. The removal of the existing siphons, which carry wastewater through the reservoir behind the dam, is considered a critical step before the dam itself can be removed. 

The dam is more than 400 feet long and 30 feet tall, serving as a consistent reminder of the region’s industrial past as one of nine dams that once blocked the river. The Naugatuck River Revival Group has advocated for years to remove the dam, which is seen as barring habitats for shad, eels and salmon in the region.

Current plans have the dam's removal process beginning in 2027, according to NVCOG. This will open the Naugatuck River back up and nearly become free-flowing back to the ocean. 

NVCOG anticipates this will have a positive impact on the fish coming upstream, but also will improve the environment around the river and reduce flood risk by allowing the river to return to its natural course. 


18-hole Bristol golf course hits market for $5M, pitched as housing development site

Michael Puffer

The Chippanee Country Club in Bristol is being offered for sale as a potential housing development site.

The 18-hole club property is owned by a limited liability company headed by prominent businessman Frederick W. “Fritz” Blasius Jr., owner of Waterbury-headquartered car dealership Loehmann-Balsius Chevrolet.

City records show the Blasius-affiliated LLC bought the three abutting properties — totaling roughly 140 acres between Marsh Road and Hill Street — for $1.27 million in 2015.

A 133-acre portion of the properties went on the market this week with a $5 million asking price. The seller is represented by Middlebury-based Drubner Commercial Real Estate Services.

David Theroux, principal of Drubner Commercial, said his firm hired engineering consultant SLR to conduct studies and “initial groundwork” indicating the entire site could support up to 140 housing units in various configurations. The zoning allows one unit per acre, but those units can be clustered and may include multifamily options, he said.

“It’s a relatively easy site to develop for residential housing,” Theroux said.

For now, 133 acres, including the golf course and service buildings, are for sale.

A 14,021-square-foot dining and function hall and seven acres are to be sold separately, Theroux said. The 1923-vintage building is sided with clapboard and features a gabled roof.

Although this portion of the property is not currently being marketed, a buyer of the larger parcel could acquire it as well for an additional $1.5 million, Theroux said.


Residents question plan to reconfigure lanes of busy Route 32 intersection

Sofia Acosta Silva

Waterford — State transportation officials presented plans last week to reconfigure lanes at the busy intersection of Route 32, Old Norwich Road and Route 693, and residents are expressing mixed feelings about it.

The state Department of Transportation hosted the public informational meeting Nov. 6 at Town Hall, outlining plans to add a dedicated right-turn lane from Route 32 northbound to Route 693 to help reduce congestion and crashes. The project is projected to cost $11 million, and 80% will be funded by the federal government and 20% by the state.

The project is tentatively set to begin construction in fall 2027, pending permits and funding.

The presentation, according to residents who attended, did not include a question-and-answer period. On social media, Waterford resident Tina DuBosque criticized the format and urged officials to consider a roundabout rather than adding lanes.

“Consider instead a large traffic circle, accommodating and slowing down traffic coming from everywhere, rather than spending $11 million on sort-of solving only one Route 32 problem,” DuBosque wrote.

DuBosque also pointed out potential access challenges for residents along the east side of Route 32 and Hempstead Drive, who may need to take alternate routes once construction begins.

“Folks ... will need to get more creative about accessing Route 32 north- or southbound,” she wrote.

The Department of Transportation says the right-of-way impacts are limited to reconstructing and grading residential driveways within the project area. Project plans and visuals are available on the state’s website at portal.ct.gov/DOTWATERFORD0152-0163.

Residents can submit feedback until Nov. 20 by referencing State Project No. 0152-0163 and emailing dotproject152-163@ct.gov.

Questions may also be directed to project manager Nicholas Ivanoff at nicholas.ivanoff@ct.gov or 860-594-2597.